×
top 200 commentsshow 500

[–]Kenku_Ranger 240 points241 points  (95 children)

Other Earth religions are also mentioned.

Here is an article which contains the human religions which have been referenced in Star Trek. You can then click on those links for more information.

But a few quick examples. Greek Mythology is real in Star Trek, with Kirk meeting Apollo. Ardra also falsely claims to be the devil. Kirk met someone who might be Lucifer.

Then there is the time they found out that the planet of the Romans also had a Jesus figure. The son, not the sun.

[–]jdl_uk 84 points85 points  (65 children)

Not to mention the 5th movie

[–]Grogosh 114 points115 points  (16 children)

Why does god need a starship?

[–]Kenku_Ranger 33 points34 points  (12 children)

To add to his collection.

[–][deleted] 46 points47 points  (10 children)

Did no one build ships in bottles when they were a boy?

[–]Erika_Bloodaxe 30 points31 points  (3 children)

I did, Sir.

[–]21lives 27 points28 points  (2 children)

Thank you, Mr O’Brien

[–]soniclore 9 points10 points  (1 child)

I did! Lots of fun!

[–]Realistic-Safety-565 27 points28 points  (2 children)

I did not play with boys

[–]bwwatr 10 points11 points  (1 child)

Flawless reference 😂 edited back in outtake

[–]w1987g 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I absolutely love that channel. Half his edits you can't even tell where the blooper is

[–]Shufflepants 13 points14 points  (2 children)

What's truly ridiculous about that scene is that Worf responds to Picard's query with "I do not play with toys". But in an episode in a previous season, we specifically see Worf building a model ship in his quarters!

[–]TheAndyMac83 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Hey, Worf was specifically responding to a question about his hobbies when he was a boy, of course his current hobbies don't apply! :p

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

He's very sensitive abpit his perceived masculinity

[–]haresnaped 16 points17 points  (0 children)

He broke His little ships.

[–]SYLOH 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You know the way there's countably infinite and uncountably infinite?
Same deal with omnipotence.
God's omnipotence would be analogous to countable infinite.
A Starfleet Star Ship's deflector would be analogous to uncountably infinite.

[–]Anarcho-Appalachia 44 points45 points  (42 children)

Ontop of that chakotays "religion" was basically completely made up. Indigenous cultures across America write hate mail to him for how wildly inaccurate and racist his character was.

[–]kgabny 35 points36 points  (11 children)

That really wasn't Beltran's fault though, was it? It wasn't his fault they hired the biggest fraud in Native-American relations...

[–]AnalBlaster42069 27 points28 points  (1 child)

To be fair, Voyager tried to have native traditions included, but they hired a fraud: Jamake Highwater AKA Jack Marks.

He was already known as a fraud by the time he was hired though, so it's on them

[–]Pristine-Ad-4306 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agreed. IDK how willful it was or wasn't but they either didn't look past the credentials he handed them or they chose to ignore it at the time. I hate it especially now that I know and can only imagine what its like for Native American trekkies. Who knows what we could have gotten if they'd hired someone legit and listened to them.

[–]pgm123 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This. The show doesn't show any Native religion. It's completely made up.

[–]ifeelallthefeels 7 points8 points  (26 children)

You think that still happens?

A letter from… the national Sioux foundation… alright… sigh

[–]Anarcho-Appalachia 22 points23 points  (25 children)

Lol probably not but that is a funny image of Robert beltrane getting all that hate on Twitter for being transphobic and then still getting physical hate mail from the indigenous too lol.

[–]ifeelallthefeels 13 points14 points  (24 children)

Couldn’t find any transphobic stuff, but I saw:

“Robert Beltran thinks the prime directive is ‘fascist crap’”

PITCHFORK. I NEED A PITCHFORK

[–]DavidBarrett82 18 points19 points  (4 children)

In fairness, the prime directive is good as a guideline but TERRIBLE as an absolute. I prefer the model that the Culture uses: incredibly well-thought-out philanthropic measures used to guide or uplift other civilizations.

Also, don’t fuck with the Culture.

[–]ifeelallthefeels 11 points12 points  (2 children)

TIL. “The Culture” sounds like some kind of red pill thing lol

[–]DavidBarrett82 9 points10 points  (1 child)

At least it’s not “the Base”. 😬

[–]Vulcorian 8 points9 points  (6 children)

He caught some flak on Twitter for breaking strike rules. A fan responded to him asking if he was ok, and that anyone who wasn't supportive of him weren't Trek fans, just weirdos with pride flags and pronouns in their bios.

Beltran responded to that tweet Real Star Trek fans are fantastic, very true, kind of implying he doesn't think LGBTQ+ Trek fans are real fans.

[–]ifeelallthefeels 4 points5 points  (5 children)

Damn haha.

Sounds like some online boomer stuff though. I could be wrong, but I would guess he didn't read or understand what he was replying to.

[–]radiogramm 4 points5 points  (1 child)

The Prime Directive is more or less the polar opposite to “fascist crap.” It quite literally is a philosophy of non-interference.

We seem to live in an era where words don’t mean anything and people are too ignorant to pick up a dictionary.

[–]Pristine-Ad-4306 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yea, its been happening for a while but people have morphed "Nazi" and "Fascist" to simply mean a strict adherence to rules. Like the "Soup Nazi". It just washes away the fact that the Nazis broke all norms and rules surrounding human decency and liberty in the pursuit of untethered power. Thats the opposite of "following rules".

[–]ambientsubversion 6 points7 points  (2 children)

Or the 5th movie’s predecessor, and successor to TOS: Plato’s Stepchildren, the TAS: The Magicks of Megas-Tu. They were literally supposed to find God while exploring the center of the galaxy. NBC wouldn’t let them use God so they used Lucien (aka Lucifer). Roddenberry had pitched the idea of meeting God before also. In the end NBC made them change everything to being about magic rather than religion or spirituality, which really makes it all completely batshit.

[–]Nexus_Knight_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Life's simpler not mentioning the 5th movie.

[–]pauloh1998 20 points21 points  (24 children)

Greek Mythology is real in Star Trek, with Kirk meeting Apollo.

Whaaat 💀💀

[–]Agent_Galahad 65 points66 points  (10 children)

I haven't watched TOS but it's probably a 'gods were actually just aliens' thing like in Stargate

[–]thanbini 60 points61 points  (2 children)

That's exactly what it was.

[–]Anarcho-Appalachia 19 points20 points  (1 child)

But also these aliens were A LOT Like Q lol.

[–]StoneGoldX 13 points14 points  (0 children)

They all are.

[–]Erika_Bloodaxe 15 points16 points  (5 children)

They weren’t gods in the same way Q isn’t. You essentially have to reject the premise of gods which aren’t all powerful and all knowing or they kinda qualify as gods. And considering we (some humans) didn’t expect gods to be completely omnipotent until rather recently (and many still don’t), The Profits “aren’t” gods but only under a very strict yet arbitrary definition.

[–]CloysterBrains 25 points26 points  (1 child)

I think you switched your Bajor and Ferenginar there lol

[–]HapticRecce 13 points14 points  (1 child)

Clarke 101: any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic...

And Ray, if someone asks if you're a god, you answer yes...

[–]-reggie- 39 points40 points  (12 children)

”mankind has no need for gods”

go, Kirk!

”we find the one quite adequate”

dammit, so close!

[–]pgm123 14 points15 points  (3 children)

Script writers were trying to avoid censorship or boycotts on that one.

[–]getoffoficloud 3 points4 points  (1 child)

It's worth noting that a lot of what we associate with Roddenberry's views came in the 1970s, well past when the original series was produced.

[–]-reggie- 5 points6 points  (0 children)

yeaaaa…it WAS the 60s 😅

[–]Raxtenko 3 points4 points  (2 children)

There was a Chapel, implying the presence of priest/minister onboard, in TOS. We weren't close lol.

[–]Adamsoski 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Not necessarily, some airports have non-denominatal chapels for general use of anyone who needs a space for religious purposes, it could be the same in the Enterprise.

[–]Raxtenko 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thinking on it Kirk was the one officiating the wedding at the Chapel so you're likely correct here.

[–]Lotronex 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Kirk was talking about Himself.

[–]-reggie- 2 points3 points  (0 children)

hahah this is the correct answer

[–]Reduak 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In Enterprise, Phlox referenced Catholicism and Buddhism. He said he attended mass at St. Peter's in Rome and visited a Budhist monastery in Tibet. But, that would have been a couple hundred years before the TNG/DS9/Voyager/Lower Decks era.

[–]whelmr 364 points365 points  (36 children)

While the Prophets aren't a real religion, I think DS9 did an excellent job of tackling religion and religious characters of all kinds. Honestly it's probably for the best to use a made up religion both in terms of sensitivity and having a religion that has all the elements you'll need for specific plot points or issues you want to tackle.

[–]Hopeful_Hamster21 70 points71 points  (16 children)

Agreed. And regarding Chakotey, I think they could more or less make his up as well. He was some sort of first peoples, but I don't think they ever specified of what tribe, nation, or even where he was from. Never minding the fact that it was later revealed that his people and religion had been deposited on earth by aliens. So it's not like they were working with a specific tribe and religion that could be known to us and then scrutinized.

[–]Telefundo 127 points128 points  (7 children)

I think they could more or less make his up as well

What's ironic about this is that's actually what happened. They hired a "consultant" who was supposedly an expert on first nations culture and was actually a fraud who literally made it all up.

[–]Abe_Bettik 68 points69 points  (1 child)

To be fair to Star Trek, the fraud in question was a prominent American "authority figure" who authored 30+ books and wrote PBS documentaries.

While there were allegations against him in the 1980s, none of it stuck until after his death in 2001 when all of the paperwork was revealed.

[–]Telefundo 33 points34 points  (0 children)

To be fair to Star Trek

Oh yeah for sure. It wasn't my intention to hold Trek or its producers etc.. responsible for it. The man was clearly an accomplished fraud. Sure they got duped, but clearly so did a LOT of other people. I just thought that OPs comment was pretty funny given that it's exactly how it happened lol.

[–]Hopeful_Hamster21 12 points13 points  (2 children)

Well... Ugh... 🤦 The fraud bit is upsetting. But.... For the sake of being distant from actually touching on real first nations, maybe that was for the better? I dunno... Maybe it did more harm than good by perpetuating stereotypes.

[–]Telefundo 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Maybe it did more harm than good by perpetuating stereotypes.

I don't think there's any "maybe" about it. Stereotypes like this only serve to further leave people uneducated about issues like these. Star Trek has always been a champion of social commentary that actually applies to real world facts. In the case of addressing first nations cultures, Voyager, though unintentionally, failed terribly.

And they've previously done much better. TNG's "Journeys End" was damn near perfect in how they handled the issue of First Nations peoples forced relocations. And that wasn't even allegory. It was as on the nose as it could get lol.

[–]petebrand9 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Yeah you got it with your last sentence. There's a bit of a difference between using a fake religion to make sociological critiques of how authoritarianism and dogma are abused in religions in general, and the cultural appropriation of using generic, inaccurate stereotypes about indigenous populations since the latter (Chakotay) wasn't done to make a point but was instead a (misguided but not really due to the fault of the writers themselves to be fair) attempt at representation

[–]Historyguy1[🍰] 45 points46 points  (2 children)

Chakotay is probably the worst representation of a native character I've seen. Because the "consultant" was literally a fraud, he wound up as the stereotyped "Magical Indian."

[–]Southern_Agent6096 25 points26 points  (1 child)

We are far from the bones of our consultant

[–]HoboVonRobotron 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I am watching this episode for the first time in 20 years, the moment I see this post. Something something mystic connections.

[–]Shufflepants 14 points15 points  (4 children)

Hackcoochiemoiya. We are far from an accurate depiction of our ancestors.

[–]qmechan 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Luckily it paid off by making sure Chakotay was the ninth most interesting character.

[–]SqueekyCheekz 13 points14 points  (7 children)

I think they went this route on purpose cuz some of the attitudes they showed in earlier stuff weren't far from your typical edge lord atheist. They wanted to have a more nuanced discussion. Not every religion is as inherently oppressive as some of the more visible, fundamentalist abramahic traditions, but they do a good job of showing some of the mechanics around how that can happen.

Side note, "raised in a church" to "edge lord atheist" is only half the journey. I've found it far more useful to understand the history of religions and how they shaped society rather than Richard dawkins science points that won't convince a true believer of anything.

[–]RigasTelRuun 135 points136 points  (30 children)

Phlox talks about going to Christian Mass when he was on Earth

[–]kb_klash 35 points36 points  (5 children)

Man, Phlox is such a great character. I've been doing a rewatch of Enterprise and he's becoming one of my favorites.

[–]seattleque 14 points15 points  (3 children)

I think the dude loves Earth cultures more than humans.

[–]JaggedGorgeousWinter 9 points10 points  (2 children)

An Earthaboo, if you will

[–]DeyUrban 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Phlox is my favorite kind of character. He doesn't have emotional baggage or anything he needs to work through like so many other characters especially today, the guy is just open-minded and happy to be there.

[–]randyboozer 4 points5 points  (1 child)

I think because Enterprise was close enough to "our time" then the original concept of humanity having sort of moved past religion

[–]somecasper 7 points8 points  (20 children)

I would assume the existence of alien species older than the Earth threw a significant amount of water on pretty much any religion with a creation story. Any of our religions still being practiced would probably be mostly for custom, or radically adapted.

[–]Raxtenko 50 points51 points  (8 children)

The vatican has been of the opinion for years that the existence of alien species does not conflict with any of their beliefs. So they're ready for the possibility.

[–]marmosetohmarmoset 41 points42 points  (6 children)

The Vatican also acknowledges the Big Bang and evolution and says they don’t conflict with their beliefs. Not every religion takes everything so literally.

[–]haysoos2 23 points24 points  (0 children)

The nickname "Big Bang" was originally used as mocking description of the the expanding model of the universe proposed by Belgian physicist Georges Lemaitre to explain the varying redshifts observed in spiral nebulae. The model was largely rejected by physicists at the time as winding back the expansion led to the implication that there was a singular point that the universe expanded from.

This starting point of the universe was perceived as being a way to justify Creation. Much of this came from the fact that Georges Lemaitre was not just a theoretical physicist, astronomer and mathematician, he was also a Catholic priest.

[–]getoffoficloud 11 points12 points  (2 children)

Yep. The ancient myths were never intended to be taken literally. Catholics say that if you're searching a mountain for ancient boat wreckage to prove something, you're missing the point of the story.

[–]ky_eeeee 5 points6 points  (0 children)

People misunderstand this all of the time, mythological stories have largely been a form of entertainment for most of history, people didn't think that they actually happened in real life. Obviously there are going to be exceptions over the entirety of Human history, but for the most part expecting ancient stories to be literal truth is like expecting Iron Man to be a real person.

Many aspects of even modern religions started out as metaphors and were not meant to be taken literally, but people have largely forgotten this and are obsessed with proving that their stories literally happened and their god literally exists and will solve all of their problems.

[–]Astrokiwi 16 points17 points  (3 children)

Nah it really only contradicts certain traditions within certain religions. Religions are big amalgams of different ideas that ebb and flow over time, and even the traditions that claim to follow the literal beliefs of its founders are just another layer of modern tradition and interpretation on top. The is, for instance, a huge diversity in how the various Christian denominations have viewed the Biblical Creation story - and even the role and importance of the Bible in general - and this has continually changed throughout time, and differs between churches and countries. New information is just another factor that affects these shifts - churches may or may not change, people may leave, others may join, people may move to more radical or more mainstream churches, as they always have.

[–]HomsarWasRight 10 points11 points  (2 children)

This is a good point. I’m Christian and I never really once considered a literal reading of the Genesis creation narrative to be essential. It wasn’t really on my radar until I got older and found out it was apparently a point of contention.

I would bet every penny I’ll make in my lifetime that extraterrestrial life exists. Whether there is any other intelligent life in our galaxy, or whether we’ve already passed through some sort of great filter, I’m split on.

Either way, it won’t affect my faith much.

[–]Hero4adyingworld 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Most mainline Protestant clergy in America (like me) would tell you that a literal reading of Genesis isn't even something that we usually do, and is definitely not essential. Especially since there are two separate creation accounts there, with a third one in Isaiah.

Fundamentalists and their Evangelical allies pushed more people into unbelief by forcing their bullshit interpretations as the only valid ones.

[–]HomsarWasRight 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What’s funny is that I grew up in American evangelicalism. But I did it from overseas (I think you can put together why). So I was (am) both of it and not of it.

Though my parents are quite evangelical and conservative (more so on the latter as they’ve aged), my dad always encouraged my love of science as a kid. And never really told me there was much to conflict with the faith there. So I never thought there should be.

[–]StarksFTW 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Most Christians arnt the far right American mega church type, those sorts of beliefs are relatively new. Most acknowledge the possibility of aliens and don’t deny the Big Bang, or evolution, for centuries science has been used to further understand Gods creation. But even by the crazed zealot standard with how many aliens look, talk, and act like humans that would probably only serve as proof of their faith give the whole “man is made in God’s image” deal. Hell the franchise could explore that maybe go a little further than the Terra Nova group from enterprise.

[–]Brunette3030 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There’s nothing in the Bible that disallows aliens.

[–]Crassweller 8 points9 points  (2 children)

There are literal trees older than some religious creation stories. That hasn't stopped people believing them.

[–]DontBanMeBro988 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Very few religions other than American evangelicals take their religious teachings that literally.

[–]NotACyclopsHonest 118 points119 points  (10 children)

Kassidy Yates mentions how disappointed her mother will be that her and Sisko’s wedding ceremony was going to be officiated by a Bajoran vedek rather than a human minister, so obviously some kind of spirituality still exists (no matter what TNG said about it).

[–]uberguby 75 points76 points  (9 children)

likewise joseph sisko quotes the bible, which doesn't necessarily mean faith, but at least means familiarity with it.

[–]gmlogmd80 61 points62 points  (4 children)

Considering you've got Jacob, Joseph, and Benjamin in the one family that makes sense.

[–]Yosho2k 11 points12 points  (1 child)

The father, the son, and the Holy Creole Restaurant.

[–]ClintBarton616 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Today I finally noticed ...

[–]MikeTheBard 112 points113 points  (24 children)

My headcannon is that Chakotay has zero experience with real Native American beliefs.

The society he was raised in was one that was deliberately reconstructed from an extinct culture- They had a legitimate spiritual connection to the land, they did extensive research, but they're still basing everything on a best guess as to how their ancestors might have done things.

THEN, he canonically ignores most of it growing up, and by the time he really starts going to look for his roots, he has to research everything on his own.... With mixed results.

[–]No_Refrigerator4584 33 points34 points  (10 children)

Sort of like how Wicca is an attempt to reconstruct the ancient Celtic faiths from the little information that we have of those faiths, since there were few written records and a lot of the knowledge was lost.

[–]MikeTheBard 40 points41 points  (7 children)

Forgive me for correcting you, but speaking as a Pagan for 35+ years, this actually *is* an area of expertise for me. I ALMOST touched on this in my above post, but thought it would be too tangential.

What you're describing more closely resembles the efforts of modern reconstructionist religions like Druidry and Norse Heathenry. In both cases, there are organizations like OBOD and The Troth who are making a serious effort to do real scholarly and archeological research to recreate these lost cultural beliefs. There is an implicit understanding that the original ways were indeed lost, and that what we have is a "best guess" based on the most accurate information we can find- And those practices are updated as we learn more.

Wicca, and I say this with the utmost respect, was created in the 1950s as a new thing and wasn't trying to reproduce an older belief system. Gerald Gardner assembled it from little bits of historical fact, mythology, Hermeticism, mystery lodges like the Masons and Golden Dawn, and just plain made up the rest- Along with a completely fabricated mythological backstory. For clarification, as someone who does practice that faith, I personally believe there was some divine inspiration involved in that process of turning those varied influence into a cohesive whole, but again that's a matter of faith, not history.

AND NOW that both of these approaches have been around for almost a century, we have tons of people combining them into a whole slew of different traditions and approaches that are each some varying mix of personal gnosis, historical research, misunderstanding, and general bullshit.

And that is pretty much where I picture Chakotay. He remembers a little bit of a bona-fide tradition, but I'd wager that a huge portion of it has been reconstructed from cultures long lost on Earth. AND THEN he's mixed it up with a bunch more quasi-historical practices that are a mix of cherry-picking and fantasy roleplay. Which again, I am not saying is automatically invalid, but I think it's important to have an objective understanding of "this is a personal belief that works for me" versus "this is a tradition which has been passed down as part of my culture".

[–]getoffoficloud 10 points11 points  (3 children)

Not to mention that what we think of as Wicca, today, is pretty far from the original version of the 1950s and 60s, due to writers like Starhawk in the 70s getting it away from the nudity and light bondage stuff and making it more spiritual.

[–]MikeTheBard 5 points6 points  (2 children)

Come now, who doesn't love a little nudity and light bondage now and then?

Seriously, though- NGL, I kind of love tracing the family tree of Western magick and seeing how it influences and is influenced by other traditions as it evolves. It really is kind of fascinating to be able to see that happen almost in real time, knowing how many of the great religions of history probably went through almost the same process.

[–]getoffoficloud 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Ironically, so much of modern paganism is rooted in old esoteric Jewish and Christian traditions. Catholics are like "Divine Mother? We already have that." :)

[–]MikeTheBard 3 points4 points  (0 children)

And then the Pagans are like YEAH WE KNOW- YOU STOLE HER FROM US and then a bunch of old Jews are like WE DON'T KNOW WHAT CROWLEY TOLD YOU ABOUT THE KABBALLAH, BUT... and then everyone gets REALLY uncomfortable.

[–]Captain_Dillan 13 points14 points  (1 child)

It always amuses me to see men like Gerald Gardner regarded as anything other than another fraud. No education, bigoted, a cheater and sexual deviant, lied about his organization's foundings, stole every single facet of said organization from the Rosicrucians, and would keep a strangle hold over his cult of "High Priestesses" (see Sex Toys). I get Paganism is subjective but c'mon, he's no different from hacks the likes of L Ron Hubbard and Joseph Smith. Or Jackie Marks for that matter. My head canon is that a fraud in the 20th century made up a Native religion based on historical beliefs and so many people bought into it the whole organization took on a life of it's own. This led to the 24th century where certain groups of people still practice to this day, including Chakotay's gullible tribe.

[–]actuallychrisgillen 3 points4 points  (0 children)

At least when he passed he left a religion that basically says 'don't be a dick' instead of 'send me money'.

IMO you can't put Wicca and Scientology in the same category, in spite of their common origins.

[–]DerelictBombersnatch 12 points13 points  (0 children)

This... weirdly works.

[–]Erika_Bloodaxe 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I doubt Native American/First Nations culture went extinct but I could also see a hybrid religion forming which from the increased solidarity and interaction and intermarriage but I would expect individual tribes practicing their traditional beliefs as well.

[–]TargetApprehensive38 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This does make sense. He came from a colony world that was settled by people from a bunch of different indigenous groups that were trying to reconstitute some version of their ancestors' culture.

[–]nojellybeans 41 points42 points  (11 children)

I feel like the Christmas scene in Generations counts as at least a mention of Christianity.

[–]Plodderic 30 points31 points  (6 children)

Also in the running for “Picard as world’s most English Frenchman”.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points  (5 children)

Well, his family was English, they just returned to France before he was born. So hevs French, but he was raised in France around English culture and accents.

[–]Erika_Bloodaxe 9 points10 points  (3 children)

They were French but lived in England for a time. They only left because of the Nazis (Earth variety, presumably no aliens were involved in that timeline)

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (2 children)

I know, I meant his immediate family. He never specifies when they returned to france though, but given that Jean Luc is French but bith he and his father have English accents, I can only presume that the family resided in England for quite a few generations.

[–]Anarcho-Appalachia 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Generations before he was born though. In Picard he mentions his family returns in the 2070s.

[–]icecreamkoan 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Even in the early 21st century, Christmas is becoming an increasingly secular holiday. Plenty of non-Christians celebrate a secular Christmas.

By the 24th century Christmas might be fully secular - much as you would be hard-pressed to call Halloween a religious holiday today, despite its origins in All Hallows' (a.k.a. All Saints' Day) Eve and Samhain.

[–]datafromstartrek2 79 points80 points  (29 children)

there's the whole irish catholic church in fair haven, sha ka ree guy poses as the christian god

https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Christianity

[–]angry_cucumber 82 points83 points  (28 children)

There's also no way that planet of racist Irish stereotypes from TNG wasn't catholic.

[–]CommunicationTiny132 24 points25 points  (8 children)

I dunno, I would have expected Catholics to raise a religious objection to the whole "every woman has to have at least three children from three different men" plan.

[–]angry_cucumber 12 points13 points  (0 children)

easier to have the stereotypical 30 kids that way?

[–]Cloberella 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Plus the Scottish planet Beverly’s ghost candle boyfriend was from.

[–]democritusparadise 2 points3 points  (2 children)

The other colony were protestants, of course.

[–]CX316 34 points35 points  (2 children)

I did a quick search and couldn't see anyone else mention it but there's clearly a practicing muslim (or at least culturally muslim?) character in Lower Decks pictured in the background of shots wearing a hijab

[–]WhiteKnightAlpha 19 points20 points  (1 child)

As well as a Sikh officer, only known as Arjun so far, seen in the background since the pilot episode.

[–]803_days 18 points19 points  (0 children)

It's encouraging how the longer Roddenberry has been dead, the more willing writers are to abandon his worst ideas.

[–]angry_cucumber 29 points30 points  (15 children)

Native American culture has always kind of been singled out by Trek. TOS had encounters with Kukulkan, which was a Mayan/Aztec diety but existed in multiple native american cultures. Crew in Native American dress was shown in the motion picture.

Then there's the planet that featured when Wesley met the Traveller.

Chokotays fucking mess of culture was just buying bullshit from a con man.

[–]Ok_Cardiologist8232 7 points8 points  (13 children)

Native American culture has always kind of been singled out by Trek

Probably the writers trying to write the wrong of Native American cullture being basically completely ignored compared to Christianity

[–]angry_cucumber 8 points9 points  (7 children)

they picked the worst advisor if they wanted to

[–]Ok_Cardiologist8232 6 points7 points  (6 children)

Easier to make mistakes like that without the internet.

[–]Erika_Bloodaxe 6 points7 points  (5 children)

They didn’t fire him after the internet found out either as far as I am aware. Voyager ended in 2001.

[–]Anarcho-Appalachia 8 points9 points  (4 children)

That con man was outed in the 1980s before they started voyager.

[–]fearitha 9 points10 points  (4 children)

The "spiritual wise Native Americans" is a trope so old that Twain was laughing at it, pointing that most often it's just a tourist attraction.

So, if they were trying to fix the wrong, they took the worst way of doing it.

[–]ancientestKnollys 24 points25 points  (7 children)

TOS Enterprise had a Church on board.

[–]Commandoclone87 50 points51 points  (5 children)

At the very least a Chapel.

[–]SolidGoldUnderwear 28 points29 points  (4 children)

I prefer the Strange New Worlds Chapel myself.

[–]RealNiceKnife 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Helllllllloooooo Nurse!

[–]Cadoan 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Something something...on my knees more... something

[–]Sagelegend 17 points18 points  (0 children)

In Data’s Day, he mentions that there’d be the “Hindu festival of Lights.”

[–]moral_mercenary 58 points59 points  (34 children)

TOS referenced Christianity and Judaism, not sure if Greek mythology counts as religion, but it was present, sort of. But yeah, humans seem to have more or less given up on practicing religion.

You are for sure right about Chakotay being the spiritual native trope. The "cultural advisor" they hired for the show was a complete charlatan.

I think they could include more star fleet officers practicing irl religions, it could be cool to see the interplay between faith and science.

[–]angry_cucumber 35 points36 points  (5 children)

The "cultural advisor" they hired for the show was a complete charlatan.

Dude was outed in the 80s

[–]theCroc 25 points26 points  (4 children)

Yes but it was in the 80's. Getting outed wasn't as serious. Most people forgot about it pretty quickly and there was no internet to keep this stuff alive. If they didn't talk about it on TV people forgot pretty quickly. By the 90's many in hollywood probably didn't remember and just looked up "native american advisor" in someones old rolodex and went with whatever business card popped up first.

[–]angry_cucumber 15 points16 points  (3 children)

yeah but he was actually outed by journalists in LA IIRC, its not like it was the other coast. You'd think it would at least hang around town, it's not a huge community really

[–]theCroc 9 points10 points  (1 child)

Only if he was reasonably famous before it happened. If he was just an advisor that hung around tv-studios they might not have connected him to the guy that was outed more than a decade earlier.

[–]MillennialsAre40 7 points8 points  (0 children)

He was outed in small journals, it wasn't variety or anything

[–]RangerMatt76 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Kirk and a psychologist mention a Christmas party where they met in Dagger of the Mind. There is a Christmas scene in Generations. The opening scene of Balance of Terror takes place in the ship’s chapel. These examples would suggest some aspects of Christianity are still around.

[–]Eagle_Kebab 14 points15 points  (0 children)

There's been mention of the bible at leat twice.

[–]BlackHawkeDown 9 points10 points  (1 child)

Lots of people have mentioned the big ones: the chapel on the TOS Enterprise, the crew's encounters with Apollo and the Sha Ka Ree guy, Joseph Sisko quoting scripture, Yates talking about being married by a vedek instead of a human minister, etc.

I'll add that both Phlox and Archer visited Tibetan monasteries, Pike's father taught comparative religion (and Pike himself mentions attending church), the New Eden people melded a bunch of Earth religious ideas together, the TOS episode Bread and Circuses hinges on the people of the Roman planet developing Christianity on their own, and TAS featured at one point a polytheistic Enterprise crewmember. Christmas is, of course, still a holiday, as well (It's always Christmas in the Nexus).

Earth still has plenty of religious beliefs, but they don't often play into the day-to-day adventures of Starfleet crews.

[–]notmenotyoutoo 6 points7 points  (1 child)

I don’t know how far along you are but they do manage to sci fi his spiritual thing bit into a “real” thing at times. Which is more than Christianity gets when Kirk meets God and he turns out to be fake.

[–]Erika_Bloodaxe 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Satan however is very real. Heavy Metal is the true religion in Star Trek!

[–]UncleIrohsPimpHand 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No. Kirk and Pike talk about Christianity relatively often.

[–]CadianGuardsman 15 points16 points  (0 children)

You kinda hit the nail on the head. Equal parts 90s racism and equal parts 90s progressivism. The idea that their culture could not grow past religion while other cultures could is just plain hilarious if it wasn't so silly.

[–]Kelpie-Cat 26 points27 points  (33 children)

While Chakotay's religion is pretty farcical, the idea of Native Americans still having their religions in 24th century is a good one. Elimination of Native religions has always been a key tenet of settler colonialism and forced assimilation in North America. Rebranding that as triumphant secularism doesn't make it any better. The underlying assumption is still the same: Native religion is a primitive stage that Natives must be forced to move beyond if they have any hope of existing in society.

The science/faith dichotomy is one that was pretty much invented by the Enlightenment and which doesn't map well onto Indigenous science and worldview. It's deeply embedded into Western ideas of science and, by extension, science fiction. It can sometimes be very difficult for atheists from Christian cultural backgrounds to appreciate that religion is not an evolutionary stage that all enlightened people must eventually move past. Ideas of cultural evolution are so deeply ingrained in Western philosophical thought, even though anthropology abandoned them as racist decades ago.

Indigenous futurism (speculative fiction written by Indigenous authors) does a great job of incorporating Native religions into sci-fi futures. Envisioning a future where Indigenous people have "moved beyond" religion means a victory for the colonizing forces that have sought to erase Native religions since 1492. I'd love for Trek to revisit Native Americans but hire actual Indigenous futurist authors to write it.

[–]NewEnigma77 6 points7 points  (2 children)

Indigineous futurism? I want to read that. Any authors/books to suggest, please?

[–]Erika_Bloodaxe 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I’m glad that we seem to have a Trek which no longer subscribes to those ideals. In the 60’s just getting Americans to respect something other than mainstream Protestantism was a fight. JFK being Catholic was seen as “dangerous” to American independence from direct foreign control.

[–]theCroc 8 points9 points  (1 child)

It's like in Stargate where the show is extremely religion heavy but somehow keeps skirting around the abrahamic religions. Too much potential for trouble there. The closest they got was that one episode where a goa'uld poses as the devil (Because the goa'uld are incapable of the benevolence needed to pose as the abrahamic God) and the Ori being designed with a heavily catholic and lutheran aestetic.

Basically they were well aware that large parts of their audience were christian so they stayed away from directly referencing Jesus and God in the show.

[–]THENHAUS 9 points10 points  (0 children)

TNG 3.04: “Who Watches the Watchers”

Picard: “Millennia ago, they abandoned their belief in the supernatural. Now you are asking me to sabotage that achievement, to send them back into the dark ages of superstition and ignorance and fear? No!”

[–]LlamaWreckingKrew 3 points4 points  (8 children)

Part of Star Trek as a series is to push peripheral concepts to the center and in the 90s and early 2000s Native American and Native lore was relatively safe at the time. There was under representation in most television and it was something that Voyager could do to set it apart from TNG and TOS. Right there is your answer.

In the series Chakotay is a major character who could constantly reinforce the Native aspect of the show that picks up here and there. It's also a way to show how even in a more egalitarian society, Native Religions and practices struggle to find the right footing in that world. In the series Chakotay's religion is a bit of a grab bag of different Native beliefs because it has to be understood by non Native viewers and come off somewhat authentic at the time. Again it was over 24 years ago. Different times.

[–]Bastet999 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Dr. Plox mentioned his visit yo the Vatican City and other religions on earth.

[–]WhiteKnightAlpha 6 points7 points  (2 children)

My guess is that Gene Roddenberry was influenced by the New Age movement sometime between TOS and TNG. That movement tended to be against most western organised religions but fetishized some eastern and Native American religions. (Also, whales are a big deal!)

When Roddenberry lost influence over Trek, that aspect gradually faded away again.

[–]americanspiritfingrs 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I had to scroll too far to read the actual answer to OP's question!

OP, u/steampunkLover20 the reason is because Gene Roddenberry's vision of Star Trek, of the future, was that humanity had moved beyond all its petty squabbles regarding race, gender, sexuality, and religion. He is quoted as saying just that (in his own words) on numerous occasions.

In the '60s, of course, it was difficult to address the idea of no religion whatsoever and even as time progressed, it was always a touchy subject. So like most Trek, it was a concept that had to be carefully and artfully swathed in metaphor.

In one of the many Trek documentaries (the one specifically about DS9), they even say outright that they wanted to address the modern problems with religion, and in order to do that they felt the perfect way was through an alien religion, so as not to offend anyone and so that they could put it on the air.

It isn't really about one religion over the other. It's about the core concept that Roddenberry had about there being no more religion on Earth in the future; that humanity had become a spiritually enlightened race, but had moved beyond the need to cling literally to its mythology.

[–]Erika_Bloodaxe 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Gene very much tried to become who the fans thought he was.

[–]theyux 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think it was harder to do even in the 90's anything that could be interpreted as anti christian could get your show canceled. Magic the gathering was constantly under threat of cancellation over angels and demons depicted on magic cards.

I remember god the devil and bob was a sitcom show that had god always be right, the devil always be wrong and christians killed the show. I think married with children and south park are the to big first outliers that survived. And married with children avoided poking the bear.

That said even though Picard is apparently aesthetic he has shown deference to religion and was careful not to dismiss it out of hand.

[–]Erika_Bloodaxe 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Lower decks has human Muslims on the ship.

[–]ScheduleSame258 3 points4 points  (0 children)

How else would you get to hear Chakotay say "A cuchi moya" repeatedly as if his life depended on it?

[–]mando44646 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Roddenberry was a Humanist and built Trek around his ideal future where religion doesn't dictate human policies or ideologies

[–]PixTwinklestar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Casual references exist in trek though. Joseph Sisko has read and quoted the Bible to Ben, who recognized it and was surprised. I also remember in TOS’s “Bread and Circuses” when the away team was lost on the 1960s Roman Earth planet, the ran with an underground of Sun Worshippers, which confused everyone bc Romans were never that into Sun gods. Later they realized it was “Son Worshippers” and Kirk mused how fascinating it would be to see it all happen again (referencing Christianity’s rise).

Also “The Apple”’s title and obvious themes of people in paradise losing their innocence are a nod to the garden of Eden.

Source: agnostic, prolly don’t know what I’m talking about.

[–]jackity_splat 3 points4 points  (1 child)

As an Anishinaabe person, I feel like I should comment on this.

I was very young when Voyager came out and to be completely honest this was one of the first positive portrayals of a modern person from my culture. (First People’s, not Ojibwe) As a child growing up on a reserve this was very important to me, whenever we left the reserve I was subjected to horrible racism, so to see Chakotay being given respect and a position of authority was really really important even if they got A LOT wrong. It gave me hope that maybe one day the world wouldn’t spit on us and wish nothing but death upon us.

There was a lot wrong with Chakotay in terms of his nativeness being broad stroked to try and include a lot of different aspects of various cultures instead of saying he is _______ and going with that groups particular beliefs.

BUT

It also makes sense that Chakotay as a First Nations person is not exactly what we see today.

First, my people were not considered human until 1952 in Canada. So my father born in 1958 was a human but his parents weren’t born human. (According to Canadian Law) As non-humans our culture, language and very existence was illegal. We were not allowed to practice it and it was quite literally beat out of my grandparents at residential school.

So because of that long period where we were not considered human and our culture was illegal we LOST SO MUCH KNOWLEDGE. So imagine how it feels as a native to finally have your language and culture be legal to practice but… there’s been hundreds of years of abject subjugation separating you from your culture.

You talk to the elders and hope they remember and can pass on the teachings of your people.

But the elders spent the majority of their lives in residential school and if they remember the culture it is the memory of children and perhaps not accurate. Please remember that most of our cultures did not have written languages or if we did it was strictly for medicine people. There was no books to tell us what we were just the memories of elders.

Elders who had to try and hang onto that little bit of knowledge through pain and suffering every day of their lives.

And even after our language and culture was legal again that didn’t mean the colonial people wanted us to practice it.

To this day that attitude still exists and still damages our culture.

If I say to a Christian I believe in the creator, they laugh and tell me that it is nonsense.

When I was forced to be baptized Catholic, I was told by the priest that I was a soulless heathen and would burn for all eternity in hell if I wasn’t baptized and given a soul.

Voyager came out the BEFORE the last residential school in Canada closed. Think about that.

To this day we are still suffering a silent genocide. The government decides who is one of us, we are still sterilized against our will if a doctor feels it’s best for us, we are considered nothing but drunks and drug addicts.

I don’t see this changing in the future.

So even now our culture is like a bowl that has been broken and o put back together. It is not the same as it was and it cannot be. The future I see the bowl only gets broken again and again while we try to hold onto the pieces and put it back together.

So because of that Chakotay doesn’t offend me. He seems an accurate portrayal of a culture that has been broken and put back together more times than can be counted.

Do I wish Chakotay had had a defined tribe and stuck with it? Yes.

But unfortunately I know history and I don’t see the future being different.

[–]steampunkLover20[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks a lot for your message, I appreciate you sharing your feelings and thoughts about the portrayal of Chakotay. Words can't describe how sorry I am to hear about the horrible things your people went through. As an orthodox person who tries to stay connected to my tradition and religion, reading how you consider your culture with the metaphor of the broken bowl really brings tears to my eyes. I truly hope that things will be better for your people in the future and you will get the respect and the equality you deserve.

[–]Mental-Street6665 2 points3 points  (2 children)

It dates back to Gene Roddenberry’s prejudice against religion which was particularly evident in the first few seasons of TNG but was also subtly present throughout all of TOS. All of the organized establishment religions we know today are gone by the time the Federation was founded. Whether you want to believe they all died out in the aftermath of World War III or they were forcibly suppressed by the one-world government that emerged around Archer’s time probably depends on what side of the political spectrum you’re on. It’s conceivable that native religions like Chakotay’s would have survived to some small extent in isolated corners, but remember, even Chakotay himself was dismissive of his father’s religious beliefs as a youth. The general attitude promulgated by Federation society is that religion is something that only backwards and primitive people practice, and that it has no place among the “evolved sensibilities” that define their current civilization.

I highly suspect that cracks in that veneer of superiority emerged in Federation society after the Dominion War, but unfortunately modern Trek has chosen to almost entirely ignore that era, so we are left to speculate.

[–]Piano_mike_2063 2 points3 points  (4 children)

No. Season 2 Star Trek Discovery

[–]Isteppedinpoopy 2 points3 points  (3 children)

Isn’t Harry Kim Catholic and has a crucifix in his quarters? I may have imagined all of that. I haven’t watched voyager in a while. Maybe it was in a book?

[–]Aezetyr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Discovery's New Eden dealt with this topic as well. There was an entire soliloquy about how members of various Earth religions took to understand what happened to them. Religion does exist in various forms in the Trek universe, even though the franchise has been largely presented as secular. In other times Pike has shown that he has a belief in fate (at least). I wonder if that is a mark of the character or simply added because the audience knows he has a bad fate coming?

Characters like Chakotay are an exception; one reason because his beliefs were related to real Native American religion (however strongly trope-ified and were stories told by a con-artist), and that he is a main character. The fact that the episode Tattoo indicates that their "powers" were given to them by white guys from outer space shows us that Trek should never have tread those grounds in the first place; or at least not tread by writers unfamiliar or uncomfortable with the topic.

As with many things, DS9 handled religion differently and in many ways better for Trek fans. For all intents and purposes, the Bajoran religion was "explained" in a Starfleet way (though not completely). It was also a primary driving force in Kira's life; she would say that her faith saved her life because that is what a person of faith would say. Though it did rarely go beyond that (The Reckoning and other events); each character interpreted the events in their own ways without preaching that one is better than the other. DS9 also left things open for the audience to interpret (most of the time).

[–]Stardustchaser 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Diwali is mentioned in “Data’s Day,” and Uhura definitely alludes to Jesus/Christianity at the end of “Bread and Circuses.”

[–]Dash_Harber 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So two things worth pointing out here.

Firstly, indigenous faith is not monolithic. There are hundreds of different groups with hundreds of different, often conflicting beliefs. The way it is portrayed would be like creating a Christian character who speaks in tongues, reads from the book of mormon, doesn't believe in the trinity, prays to Catholic saints, and practices adult baptism. What is represented is a theme park hodgepodge of various beliefs as well as hollywood ideas made up about indigenous folks.

Second, the reason for that is they hired known grifter "Jamake Highwater" as a consultant, who has no ties to any indigenous culture, but pretended to be an expert to sell his writings and consulting services.

Not directly related, but worth pointing out for the sake of the discussion.

[–]pgm123 2 points3 points  (4 children)

So, my question is - why showing native-americans religion but not Christianity/Judaism/Islam?

To be clear, the show does not show Native American religion.

[–]hayesarchae 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If Chakotay's rambling counts as Native American spirituality, I suppose you'd have to include the Planet of Black People on TNG as representing African spirituality. The duel at the end is, supposedly, an ancient ritual. Star Trek ought never be allowed near indigenous spiritualities though, given the track record. Vulcan and Klingon religion pull from a lot of Victorian religious stereotypes about real faiths also.

[–]Overall-Habit5284 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I think Pike mentions in an episode of Discovery that he believes in God, or something along those lines?

[–]sicarius254 2 points3 points  (3 children)

I’m pretty sure TOS mentions God a few times, we also meet Apollo

[–]Menzicosce 2 points3 points  (2 children)

In who mourns for adonais Kirk says "Mankind has no need for gods. We find the one quite adequate." And in Bread & Circuses Uhura remarks they are not worshiping the sun but the "Son of God." The planet 892-IV had both Caesar and Christ. To my knowledge this is the only mention of the the big 3 religions from TOS to DS9. In Data’s Day, Data mentions Diwali but not by name he just says the Hindu Festival of Lights.

[–]MagosBattlebear 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Coming from an actual Indigenous American tribe in the United States, I wouldn't say I liked every minute of what they did with Chakotay. He was an embarrassment with the usual "white people trying to write a minority" problems and, FFS, ancient aliens (an idea that has a fundamental racist basis to it). Of course, they hired a consultant about Indigenous Americans who was claimed he was one of us but was 100% bullshit.

[–]duxpdx 11 points12 points  (1 child)

The shows would be an utter shit show if human religion is incorporated, and is antithetical to the ideals of Star Trek and its core structure. It is made clear as of TNG, era that humanity moved past religion. The issue comes up in DS9 constantly with Bajoran religion and the Federation, prophets vs wormhole aliens. The current main earth religious beliefs have been relegated to mythological status in the movies, referring to core tenets at myths.

[–]UnableLocal2918 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No. In tos when they found a modern 20th century rome they discussed worshipping the son. Which spock thought of as sun and commited that those cultures were usually violent. When uhura said no the son of god.

[–]peterfonda3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Christianity was mentioned in TOS “Bread and Circuses”. God was referred to in “Who Mourns for Adonais?” God also figured prominently in ST:V.

[–]AtrumAequitas 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Roddenberry wasn’t a fan. He liked the idea of a post religious society. It got snuck in here and there, but it’s a theme that for the most part stuck. One of the ops crew in DISCO comes from a Mennonite like background, mentioned briefly, with any actual religious part kind of washed out.

[–]SpaceDantar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it's reasonable to extrapolate that in the distant future people will be less adherent to any specific religion, and may just have spiritual feelings instead - that trend is already happening now over the last 100 years.

Star Trek was created by someone who was a humanist more than being religious. Star Trek has been VERY secular and clear over the many years that religion is mostly a superstition. That's just how it is.

That core belief has been backed off from for fear of bad publicity recently (among many changes recently to Star Trek) backing away from its core identity to appeal to a larger market.

[–]haresnaped 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No one has mentioned my favourite, where Kathryn Janeway quotes 'the Good Shepherd' (plot twist, it's her). I think it fits the Trek ideal where Earth religions have the role of cultural background, providing metaphors and concepts but not as active political forces.

I think that Babylon 5 did a better job of realistically depicting religion, both human and alien, but everywhere it crops up in Trek it's relevant to the human condition - infinite diversity in infinite combinations.

[–]NoRepresentative3533 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Joseph Sisko quotes the Bible in one episode, and Ben recognizes the passage, indicating that the Sisko family has some knowledge of christianity even though Ben at least indicates in other dialogue that he isn't personally religious.

In "Valiant", the acting Chief Engineer says something about "seeing the face of god", which could just be a turn of phrase but also would indicate that humans haven't completely forgotten about religious ideas.

[–]Piper6728 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its called not poking the bear

Religion can be a powder keg of issues, anyone can easily get offended and sides can be taken on anything

Why make problems when they can easily be avoided

Star Trek dealt with religion in an approachable way in DS9 with the bajorans

Now if you are wanting an in universe reason: theres more to starfleet and the Star Trek universe than planet Earth and one of its religions

[–]CannedDuck1906 1 point2 points  (0 children)

While not explicitly mentioned on the show, Leonard Nemoy drew on his Jewish Heritage for many aspects of Spock's character.

Leonard Nemoy on Mr. Spock's Jewish Heritage

[–]zulukilocharlie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The animated series also had Mayan mythology with Kulkulkan (which Kirk hilariously kept pronouncing incorrectly) and Greek and Roman gods made appearances, Apollo for example.

[–]EverybodyStayCool 1 point2 points  (0 children)

TNG.

"The Watchers." (I think?)

Covers monotheistic ideology. Love that episode.

"The Picard speaks!"

[–]36840327 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In the DIS episode “New Eden” the humans of Terralysium follow a religion that is “a mix of Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, and many other earth religions”

[–]JL98008 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is a female crew member, presumably Muslim, wearing a gold hijab to match her gold Operations uniform on ST:Lower Decks. She's appeared as a background character (i.e. an extra) in a few episodes.

[–]StarHunter_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, they don’t use money anymore. So all the for profit churches would go away and there would be no homeless or hungry on Earth to “save.” And I would hope that the religious wars stopped after getting nuked. So just the ones that do ceremonies for their believers would be left.

[–]sonofShisui 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Christmas gets mentioned

[–]crikett23 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In TOS Bread And Circuses, Christianity is at least implicit (haven't bothered to look up the exact dialog, so it may be explicitly stated, but as I said, at the very least it was at least implicit). In the epilogue, Urhura comments something about how they had misunderstood, and that the people on the planet of that episode were not primitive "sun worshipers," but rather, it was the Son Of God. Kirk follows with some comment about how how the religion will again win out.

[–]okebel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In Enterprise, Dr Phlox mention attending mass in Rome and going to Mecca. I don't recall the exact quote.

[–]The_Doolinator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sisko’s dad quoted the Bible to Sisko. This surprised Sisko, so it’s safe to say that neither are Christian, but the fact he would comment his surprise of his dad quoting the Bible indicates the possibility there are still enclaves of Abrahamic religions of some sort on Earth, rather than it just being someone quoting some old text.

[–]Jump_Like_A_Willys 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In TOS Bread and Circuses they visited a planet that was like Ancient Rome. There was a group of people who were heavily persecuted by the Roman-like people because they were said to be worshippers.

At the end, Spock said he was surprised that a sun-worshiping cult preached live and brotherhood. Lt. Uhura, having monitored the planet's communications corrected Spock that they didn’t worship the sun up in the sky, but rather the Son of God.. Kirk replied, “Caesar and Christ. They had them both. And the Word is spreading only now."