×
top 200 commentsshow all 404

[–][deleted] 487 points488 points  (117 children)

4chan is simultaneously the best and worst thing about the internet. I can't help but think in 1000 years it will become the Void from warhammer 40k.

[–]xander787 625 points626 points  (45 children)

4chan reminds me of a mental patient that on rare occasions spouts works of genius and humor before immediately returning to licking its own ass.

[–]DigitalHubris 234 points235 points  (24 children)

4chan is the King Lear of the internet

[–]Som12H8 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Come not between the dragon and his pr0n!"

[–]hudsonshell 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I bet if you explain you can get that back.

edit:

Sorry to doubt, actually it was quite an astute observation.

A thoooosand pardons for my faggotry.

[–]DigitalHubris 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Faggotry forgiven.

Lets not let it happen again.

[–]Fragsworth 55 points56 points  (1 child)

4chan is the embodiment of the infinite monkey theorem.

[–]withnailandI 13 points14 points  (3 children)

4chan is the Henry Darger of the Internet. A basement-dwelling janitor with Asperger's who died poor and unknown but left behind the most famous work of outsider art in history. Featuring lolis.

[–]Som12H8 14 points15 points  (0 children)

"...he wrote The History of My Life, a book that spends 206 pages detailing his early life before veering off into 4,672 pages of fiction about a huge twister called "Sweetie Pie..."

Must read.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Some of those lolis are also traps.

[–]withnailandI 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oh yeah. Forgot about that. Somebody suggested he might have been so sexually naive he didn't know girls hadn't different parts than boys.

[–]ezekielziggy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah...that about sums it up...

[–]kompulsive 1 point2 points  (0 children)

hey, we're not all mental patients.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The more you learn, the more you learn that nothing matters. At all.

[–][deleted] 50 points51 points  (2 children)

In many ways 4chan has taken the place of the Usenet:alt.*

Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea -- massive, difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind-boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it. - Gene Spafford

[–]jamangold 6 points7 points  (1 child)

I always imagined 4chan was the beach where refugees from alt.slack and alt.sex.hello.kitty washed up on.

[–]knobbysideup 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And also those from alt.sex.aluminum.baseball.bat

[–]jayd16 115 points116 points  (24 children)

To hate 4chan is to hate humanity itself. I submit that 4chan is society in its purest form.

[–]thethirdpoliceman 47 points48 points  (7 children)

If so, we're all fucked.

[–]howitzer86 27 points28 points  (4 children)

literally

[–]apparatchik 14 points15 points  (2 children)

With a giant latex dildo in an orfice you didnt know could be used for such purpose.

[–]fable2life 8 points9 points  (1 child)

Nostril ?

[–]apparatchik 14 points15 points  (0 children)

See what I mean?

You sick fuck.

[–]TheJeffAnema 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think most of us are too old for their taste.

[–]strangeelement 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You didn't know?

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (3 children)

4chan is humanity unfiltered. This is why I loved it so much before it went to shit. Criticize it all you want, but 4chan was exactly what people are like deep down inside. I suspect that's why so many hated it so much.

[–]Shaper_pmp[🍰] 26 points27 points  (9 children)

4chan is not humanity in its purest form - it's humanity at its most base and irresponsible.

That's not to insult it - I mean in the literal sense, of "acting anonymously, without acknowledgement of others as human beings, and without possibility of consequence" - it's the absolute antithesis of society. It can be insightful, thought-provoking and fucking hilarious, but the one thing it's not is responsible, or based around the idea of treating other human beings as human beings.

It's Gabriel's G.I.F Theory in its purest form, not "humanity". It's humanity in its most thoughtless, id-driven form, where the nearest real-world equivalent would be a toddler or mentally ill person.

Empathy, consideration and though for the consequences of our actions are an important part of humanity. Calling 4chan "pure" because it lacks these qualities is like calling a paraplegic "physically pure" because he lacks legs.

[–]Discchord 7 points8 points  (1 child)

4chan is more than just the self-fellation of the Id, but also an absence of the Ego. Anonymous and yet still meaningful conversations occur within the embodiment of the zeitgeist. What reveals itself is not the "purest form of man", but it is definitely the "purest form of mankind". I sincerely believe there is no place better to observe mankind in his true form, where he can be free of his socially contracted facade.

For students of Carl Jung, 4chan is the evidence for just about everything.

[–]jayd16 1 point2 points  (2 children)

I completely disagree with the idea 4chan is not a community. Clearly, 4channers treat each others as human beings. Being a message board, what else is there to do but converse with other humans?

I'm not going to disagree that 4chan is full of people doing their own thing for their own enjoyment but another thing to realize is that "Anonymous delivers." 4chan is constantly producing sauce and trusting that tits will be provided in return. 4chan works on the honor system.

The fact that this kind of kind of discourse can take place even under the conditions of full anonymity and without consequences is was makes 4chan a pure society. Morals for the sake of morals, not for fear of punishment.

[–]krunchbite 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would like to submit that 4chan is the exemplification of Hakim Bey's Temporary Autonomous Zone.

[–]agnt007 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good point.

[–]bitter_cynical_angry 34 points35 points  (2 children)

4chan is the Id of the internet.

[–]uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhok 9 points10 points  (0 children)

When there are no boundaries, you will inevitably get both extremes.

[–]regressionx 72 points73 points  (3 children)

4chan explains The Bible

[–][deleted] 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Is that captain planet on the cross? I feel like that means something important.

[–]rlayman 12 points13 points  (1 child)

Yeah, I still don't get why everybody listens to Paul, either.

[–]volch 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Because his songs were better than John's, and anyway everyone hated Yoko.

[–]onedonederp 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Should lead to some future anthropologist head scratching

[–]FedaykinII 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The distribution of 4chan has no finite variance

[–]Tzeentch 6 points7 points  (1 child)

The void? I think you mean the warp.

[–]Mikey_B 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This comment page, particularly the thread starting with this comment, inspired me to take my first trip into the jungle of /b/ (well, except the time about five years ago I headed there and immediately turned back after being greeted by a goatse-like image). It's a genuinely fascinating place.

[–]LololNostalgia 2 points3 points  (0 children)

4chan is Eddy from Ed, Edd, and Eddy.

[–]UniversalVariable 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Anonymous will lead the Horus Heresy.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I feel like this makes Reddit the Astronomican, allowing us to harness the good things from the Warp while shielding us from the worst of the bad.

Not sure what is the Webway, the separate network that is equal parts hedonism and values-based soul searching. Deviantart? Facebook?

[–]facetiously 774 points775 points  (64 children)

Quite so. I would also speculate that SQUIRREL!!!

[–]MisterSquirrel 681 points682 points  (55 children)

Somebody looking for me?

[–]A_Golden_Retriever 804 points805 points  (52 children)

You motherfucker.

[–]lcdrambrose 267 points268 points  (1 child)

You're my favorite novelty account, by far.

Yes you are! Yes you are!

[–][deleted] 38 points39 points  (0 children)

it's a great day when the reddit comments devolve quicker than the 4chan comments.

[–]OMGASQUIRREL 36 points37 points  (1 child)

THAT'S MY FUCKING LINE!

[–]SquirrelBoy 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Run Away!

[–]toocuilforschool 169 points170 points  (16 children)

I think the dog in the top hat makes a good point.

It's fun to say that.

[–]Anthropoid1 6 points7 points  (2 children)

I would say to the dog in the top hat, the more fundamental problem seems to be quite the opposite. It's major corporations, or "competent people exploiting those resources," who have wedged their way into the government by way of lobbying and corruption. Granted, this then results in unfair and unproductive government regulation, as suggested by Sir Pug.

[–]DJGibbon 7 points8 points  (0 children)

HIS NAME IS LORD PUGGINGTON AND YOU WILL NOT FORGET THAT

[–]a_shark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So this corporation thing seems to happen in quite a lot of states.

If there was a OS where every computer running on it would get a virus after a short time, would you say that the viruses are the problem? I think a reasonable person would say that the OS sucks because it invites viruses.

In the same way i believe that not the corporations are a problem but that our system of government sucks if it invites corruption like that.

And please don't forget that corporations only exist because our system of government created this type of business. It made up the name and gave special rights to it without accountability.

[–]Scaryclouds 13 points14 points  (2 children)

Don't know if I agree with what he says. It comes down to what he means by "competent." In many respects one could say the oil companies have been competently exploiting the resources of the planet, however that exploitation has come at a very high human and environmental cost. So if the top hat dog is using that definition of competence then I totally disagree.

[–]recreational 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Also, there's an inherent selection bias in the OP dog's complaint; of course the public only notices when direct public services are cut, so it looks like that's the first thing to ever be cut. That's because when Frank the social worker is fired and his coworkers have to take over the extra burden, you're not losing anything immediately appreciable, even though it might negatively affect their performance. More likely, if a department is understaffed, rather than thinking, "Wow, they're really overworked down at department Q, I wish they'd hire another worker", you think, "Those fucking lazy sponges haven't gotten back to me and I called three days ago!"

Not to say that government workers aren't generally overpaid, of course, but that's a unions issue.

[–]stronimo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think recent events support the idea that oil companies are especially competent.

[–]Tallergeese 163 points164 points  (5 children)

I like that the servant, Nigel, is black.

[–][deleted] 95 points96 points  (0 children)

Yeah I noticed that as well, then I went back and checked the colors of the other dogs.

Nigel, please.

[–]giants3b 21 points22 points  (0 children)

I was thinking this too, subtle and genius.

[–]chernickov 40 points41 points  (0 children)

Do you really like that?

[–]wushu18t 7 points8 points  (0 children)

wow, i didn't notice that. subtle. i like it.

[–]Uberhipster 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Butler.

[–]rivermandan 19 points20 points  (3 children)

for those redditors that don't understand 4chan: those posts were all made by the same person, not a string of verbose pedants. it was inevitably a repost from within its ranks, or more likely lifted from a friend of a friend.

[–]JudgeMarilynMilian 53 points54 points  (1 child)

Those weren't actually written by genius dogs?

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

They were all by the OP.

So just one genius dog.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I want to believe that there are numerous genius dogs.

[–]Oxperiment 135 points136 points  (11 children)

I normally downvote the 4chan reposts, BUT THIS SHIT HAD ME BELLY LAUGHING. Goddamn, Frank is an asshole.

[–]pokersjokers 51 points52 points  (10 children)

Oh man, I can usually suppress my laughs when browsing reddit but this shit just gave me a P90X ab exercise.

[–]Denny_Craine 243 points244 points  (31 children)

I prefer this thread

http://i.imgur.com/n6Ijq.jpg

[–]ajooha 134 points135 points  (7 children)

I'd like to imagine that is how philosophy is really discussed in private.

[–]reuf 35 points36 points  (6 children)

If not, that's how it should be discussed.

[–]Denny_Craine 9 points10 points  (5 children)

we discussed it like that in my philosophy class once, the professor was doubled over in laughter, yet also slightly confused.

[–]LesterDukeEsq 37 points38 points  (4 children)

Sure you did, internet guy.

[–]AIDS_Pizza 5 points6 points  (2 children)

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (1 child)

It's ironic because the file itself is .jpg.

[–]DaimonicPossession 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hegel would have loved this thread, as well.

[–]thedailyflash 1 point2 points  (0 children)

David Hume was Scottish so there's no way he'd be fucking Madame Descartes with his huge uncircumcised English cock. Cogito ergo mom.

[–]redditor3000 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Is this some subcategory of 4chan I don't know about?

...Because I'd like to go there.

[–]ricehq 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Thank you so much for that...I forgot how much I miss 4chan.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure. On the one hand, the philosopher's beliefs were well presented, often quite engaging really. And while some may have come off as perhaps a tad aggressive in their personal attacks, it was the fire they brought to their convictions that made the whole thread so entertaining. In the end I laughed a lot, and you know what? I learned a lot too.

On the other hand, a feisty political discussion ensuing between several dogs dressed up like liberal economists? I have not laughed that hard in long time.

[–]StManTiS 80 points81 points  (3 children)

Frank...I am disappoint.

[–]DonTago 12 points13 points  (1 child)

Frank accidentally the entire fleshlight...

[–][deleted] 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Frank ate all the mints in the medicine cabinet and now he don't feel so right.

[–]slyguy183 1 point2 points  (0 children)

DAMMIT FRANK! I was saving that.

[–]Jrix 52 points53 points  (1 child)

When I saw the Glenn Beck dog I laughed so fucking hard.. it hurts, it fucking hurts.

[–]CatsAreAssholes 9 points10 points  (4 children)

I'd like to see a bunch of asshole cats explain it that well!

[–]JuniperJupiter 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Well they did a great rendition of Enter Sandman once a la 4chan. :D

[–]Randomphyre 35 points36 points  (7 children)

The price of gold will never ever fall just like home prices

[–]martinw89 24 points25 points  (0 children)

In a worldwide mega-catastrophe that wipes out most perishable supplies and reduces society to an agriculture based shit hole, you'll be able to find me because I will constantly be yelling

WHERE'S MY GOLD‽ I NEED MY GOLD!! SOMEBODY SELL ME MORE FUCKING GOLD GODDAMNIT!!!!

[–]crusoe 8 points9 points  (4 children)

Until we start mining asteroids, then gold will plummet.

[–]memefilter 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Unlikely, as I understand it. Gold, being heavy/dense, is probably not found in the ejecta of a large collision. One assumption is that the asteroid belt is largely lighter elements. Another idea is that it's the heavy stuff that's left over, spread out over the trojans. Guess we should go check.

[–]iscyborg 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I learned a new word "bubble" which is used to describe things that go up in price. I'm an economist now. Hurr.

[–]FormerSlacker 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Frank has a good point.

[–]JimmyJamesincorp 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Funny how the help is black. 4chan works in many layers.

[–][deleted] 18 points19 points  (6 children)

The first post is actually pretty interesting. The rest are funny, but they are less astute mimics of the OP.

[–]R-Guile 41 points42 points  (4 children)

The others are the OP.

[–]qbxk 5 points6 points  (1 child)

seems like everybody has a picture of a dog in a suit they can use for an avatar these days

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

That crossed my mind initially. Is it true?

[–]xxon 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Look at the time stamps. Too close to be anything else.

[–]zotquix 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Honestly, IMHO the cynicism and inaccuracy of what the other dogs were saying makes them seem nearly as ignorant as Frank.

Then again, it may be a mistake to expect discernment from those who drink out of the toilet.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Then again, it may be a mistake to expect discernment from those who drink out of the toilet.

Oh, here we go with the ad-homs again! Just because a speaker has a particular choice in drinking water doesn't make his point any less correct! Good day sir!

[–][deleted] 18 points19 points  (8 children)

I've seen this before and I have to say, if it wasn't for the butler dog saying "gentleman" instead of "gentlemen", this thread would be perfect.

[–][deleted] 40 points41 points  (0 children)

Fuck, you ruined it for me

[–]angryvigilante 9 points10 points  (5 children)

Well, shit, someone can just edit that "a" into an "e" and we'd have perfection!

[–]spies 22 points23 points  (4 children)

[–]freshmas 7 points8 points  (2 children)

Has nobody heard of .png?

[–]syzygic 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It lost a touch with the 'uneeded' from the first dog as well...

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not really, there's nothing genius about that dog. Sad, so sad.

[–]AskYourMother 2 points3 points  (0 children)

4chan is so unexpected some times. You never know what is waiting you there. The only way you can surf those pages is an axe on one hand and 911 pre dialed on the phone.

[–]mrpickles 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's some funny shit

[–][deleted] 23 points24 points  (49 children)

AKA, a libertarian uses pictures of dogs to espouse their views.

[–][deleted] 30 points31 points  (1 child)

AKA a redditor uses labels to justify a quick dismissal of a viewpoint.

[–]NotMarkus 26 points27 points  (39 children)

What about that was libertarian?

[–][deleted] 23 points24 points  (36 children)

Everything...

Specifically, the idea that the vaunted founding fathers deliberately crippled government from the outset, the idea that America became great because of rampant capitalism unfettered by the intervention of an incompetent government, and that only by government stepping aside and letting the market take over will America become great again.

It's all patently false, and reads as a pretty obvious libertarian manifesto.

[–][deleted] 26 points27 points  (14 children)

That's pretty much just one post though. Everything else is more or less correct.

And even then, I feel like the author wasn't promoting the bulldog's point of view. He's obviously a wealthy tycoon of some sort, what with his adorable capitalist oppressor's suit & tie, so naturally he'd be in favor of small government. Perhaps the entire thing was lampooning uptight republicans, comparing their intelligence to that of a common canine. It's also a possibility, considering that 4chan is an extremely large imageboard, that the thread was hijacked by an anarcho-libertarian douchebag. It doesn't quite make sense that the OP would bash government budget slashes on parks and recreation centers, then go ahead and promote an anti-government agenda. I think the OP just likes parks. After all, he is a dog.

[–]omnilynx 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It doesn't quite make sense that the OP would bash government budget slashes on parks and recreation centers

He was bashing government's actions in response to budget slashes, not the cuts themselves. The post was all about government corruption.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (12 children)

I disagree. The entire thread had a libertarian undercurrent. Distrust of government, they only want to raise your taxes and grab more power, etc.

[–][deleted] 20 points21 points  (8 children)

Distrust of government isn't inherently libertarian. I, a staunch liberal, think politicians are Machiavellian motherfuckers that should be treated with the utmost skepticism. The dogs (in the beginning) weren't expressing distaste at taxes, rather, misuse of funds acquired by taxes. The OP criticized politicians for not cutting out actual waste, such as payments made by corrupt politicians to "do nothing lawyers" and "crooked asphalt contracts" which I think we can all agree should be trimmed out of our budget. In fact, I think he was in support of socialist policies. Take how he condemned the practice of libraries and museums. Most libertarians are against such institutions (herp derp let the free market decide which books are right. Malthus will decide whether evolution or creationism should be regarded as factual!) so why would he imply that cutting funding to such organizations would be bad?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

No, it was just pointing out one tactic used by the government and explaining it to an audience. The ultimate goal of course would be to remove this tactic from the governments arsenal by informing the people, but its more likely that he just wanted to bitch about something that he figured out/learned and is now bothering him.

For example: saying my mother often guilts me into doing things she wants doesn't mean I hate my mother.

Saying that schools indoctrinates children into loving America through song (god bless America, yankee doodle), pledges, dance, and plays (school performances) doesn't mean I hate America (or schools for that matter).

Saying women sometimes cry because they know it will get them their way doesn't mean I hate women.

Saying sports players often fake injuries in order to get penaltys called doesn't mean I hate sports.

Basically, just because someone calls out a particular tactic used that they don't agree with doesn't mean they hate everything about the tactician, just that they hate the tactic. Honestly, I thought voicing your opinion about a particular piece of a system without fear of being accused of hating the whole system was one of the great things about America. Your statements strikes like those who claimed that questioning Bush meant you were a traitor.

[–][deleted] 48 points49 points  (16 children)

the idea that the vaunted founding fathers deliberately crippled government from the outset

How can you even argue this? It's pretty much fact that the founding fathers disliked strong government and structured the country in such a way that government power would be restricted. What bizarro world do you live in where the founding fathers were authoritarians?

It's all patently false

Good thing you know everything so you could inform us of that. Thanks Omnipito the Magnificent.

[–]JuicedCardinal 31 points32 points  (3 children)

I believe the strongest argument in support of redthrowaway's view is that the U.S. government under the Constitution is much more powerful than the U.S. government under the Articles of Confederation. I think it's overly simplistic to say that "the Founding Fathers disliked strong government" when some, such as Hamilton, pushed for rather extensive government powers. The Constitution seems to be less about having a weak government (which didn't work under the Articles of Confederation), and more about having a strong government that still allows that power to be checked, and doesn't have power so concentrated in one person/group that it can not be divested of that.

Of course, that isn't really the case now. But I believe that's more a result of incredible wealth held by a few.

[–]zmjjmz 12 points13 points  (2 children)

Adams and Hamilton (among others) were Federalists, that is well known. The reason the Articles of Confederacy were scrapped was because they were basically worthless, and without the ability to regulate interstate commerce, the government was completely powerless to do anything about the lack of a common currency.

[–]u_suck_paterson 17 points18 points  (1 child)

Gentlemen, dinner is served.

[–]wtfftw 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Excellent. Thank you, u_suck_paterson.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

How can you even argue this? It's pretty much fact that the founding fathers disliked strong government and structured the country in such a way that government power would be restricted.

But it's far less clear that they deliberately wanted it to be inefficient and incompetent.

[–]gtkarber 7 points8 points  (5 children)

Wow, talk about false dilemma. Either the founding fathers were authoritarian or they hated government like the libertarians?

I think the founding fathers felt that government had its place, not that it was a menace to be hobbled.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (4 children)

See, and this is what I just don't get about Americans. You hold the "Founding Fathers" in such reverence that they become a political Rorschach test. Everybody believes that the founding fathers would support their point of view, that they had their particular policies of choice in mind when drafting the constitution, etc.

FFS, people. Some of those guys were really admirable, even great men. That's awesome. You should be proud. But don't try and structure your society around what you think they would have wanted you to do. Their America was an agrarian, slave-owning, pre-industrial, took-three-months-to-cross frontier. Their policies and politics have very little to do with modern society. That goes for both the right and the left. Stop claiming that "the founding fathers wanted us to be a christian nation" or "the founding fathers wanted us to be secular". What the fuck do YOU want? What is best for your nation, and that of your children?

The founding fathers are yet another religion in a hyper-religious America, and it's time you people grew out of it. Stop arguing over what people who've been dead for 200 years would have wanted, and figure out what you need to do now to make your country the best that it can be.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I agree. The minute "The Founders" (Dominion?) are mentioned in a political debate my brain immediately shuts off or I move on to a different thread.

[–]gtkarber 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't really think it's much to say that the Founding Fathers "felt that government had its place." I mean, I think anyone who drafted a Constitution would have to say that they felt "government had its place."

You're totally right, of course, about the ridiculousness of the reverence of the Founding Fathers. But you have to remember, they hung out with Jesus and invented democracy.

[–]gtkarber 1 point2 points  (1 child)

You disagree with the statement "I think the founding fathers felt that government had its place"? That is the most generic attribution of views you could possibly ascribe to the architects of a government.

I agree with what you said and find it odd that my comment is the one that finally pushed you to say it.

[–]Megatron_McLargeHuge 4 points5 points  (1 child)

That was the dog in the tuxedo and top hat espousing capitalism. The others had different perspectives.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I noticed that too. Their views aren't genius at all.

[–]jascination 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Serious question - I've always had a genuine interest in this kind of political thinking, and it's something that I wanted to study when I was considering doing postgrad studies. What field would this kind of "political psychology" come under? I have an undergraduate degree in social psychology so would like to put it to better use than, um, a retail job <sigh>

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's just commercials as anything else. Study PR if that is want you want a degree, shampoo commercials if you want to learn. The difference might be that in politics you are more keen on using public media instead of commercials.

[–]tnkie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's fantastic :P I wanted to ask though (and I'm not criticising you) this is pretty old right? The reason I ask is because you still have post numbers :)

[–]Gfaqshoohaman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This...I... Wow. Saved.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

4chan is rather win.

[–]cofzpi 1 point2 points  (2 children)

I'm still grappling with the tobacco leaf. As a singular pursuit of wealth, there is no need to look any further. It's a renewable resource that offers no personal end to gain. I never need to look beyond the money gained. The resource that may or may not be harmed by consumption of this leaf also shows no end of growth.

Oil and coal and everything else are finite, but why does that matter? Money is the constant, everything else is a variable. There is no need to look beyond the money, and if I'm forced to make a statement of justification, what does it matter to me? My life, and the lives of those close to me, will not change the constant in any discernible way.

[–]mickeythesquid 1 point2 points  (0 children)

why do they use so much of their power for evil and not entertaining and enlightening me?

[–]Liar_tuck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I usually disdain 4chan, and then those /b/tards come along with something like this and I want to buy them a beer.

[–]poiro 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sometimes I miss 4chan, then I remember most of the good stuff ends out on reddit anyway

[–]Charlie24601 1 point2 points  (0 children)

MUST BUY GOLDS!!!!

[–]zackks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

brothers-in-law

FTFT

[–]superbad 1 point2 points  (0 children)

-- Anonymous 01/10/10 (Sun) 00:54:10 No. 187581614
Funding cuts to parks and trails has nothing to do with the cost of maintaining the trails.
It is simply government extortion to avoid having to actually cut real uneeded expenses.
Anytime there is any budget shortfall the first thing a sitting group of elected officials
does is cut those services that the public directly uses.  Libraries, Parks and Recreation,
Museums, etc.  In most cases these are the least expensive part of government
operations.  heck a hiking trails maintenance costs are so minimal as to be absolutely
negligable.  But by closing them it extorts people into making the choice "Well I really
want my parks so I will pay more in taxes and fees" rather than the government actually
cutting the wasteful spending such as crooked asphault contracts to politicians brother
in laws or high paid do nothing commissions lawyers and administrators.  This is the
same reason that whenever voters vote down a school budget the first thing the school
district does is cancel the school bus service.  It maximizes the inconvenience and pain
to the voters in the most direct way possible in order to get their desired result.  It's a
crooked scam that we have let go on for most of the 20th century.

-- Anonymous 01/10/10 (Sun) 00:55:11 No. 187581890
Indeed.  Another facet of political psychology is to distract from these crooked tactics and engage
the public in dirty battles of rhetoric.  It is but a game, with pretend "sides", and the only rule is never
speak of this game so the public is never any wiser.

-- Anonymous 01/10/10 (Sun) 00:55:49 No. 187582050
You might surmise that manipulation negates the freedom of the public's vote, allowing those 
with the capability of insidious corruption to maintain power while hamstringing the public's
curiosity for truth.

-- Anonymous 01/10/10 (Sun) 00:57:18 No. 187582380
I propose that what made America great was an abundance of natural resources and an 
incompetent government (by design) that took a few hundred years before it could manage to
wedge itself in between competent people exploiting those resources.  Now that government is
firmly wedged in, the run is over.

-- Anonymous 01/10/10 (Sun) 00:58:57 No. 187582782
Speaking of which, what is environmental reform in the political arena?  Is the goal really to help the
environment, or just an attempt by these same elected officials to utilize the cry for a cleaner earth
to gain more power and money.

-- Anonymous 01/10/10 (Sun) 01:00:17 No. 187583135
I WAS WATCHING GLENN BECK AND HE TOLD ME TO BUY GOLDS SO NOW IM
PROTECTED AGAINST 2012

-- Anonymous 01/10/10 (Sun) 01:02:14 No. 187583592
>>187583135
*** dogfceplm.jpg ***

-- Anonymous 01/10/10 (Sun) 01:02:36 No. 187583729
>>187583135
Frank... shut up.

-- Anonymous 01/10/10 (Sun) 01:03:31 No. 187583956
Sorry to intrude, gentleman, but
dinner is served.

-- Anonymous 01/10/10 (Sun) 01:05:25 No. 187584415
>>187583956
Excellent.  Thank you, Nigel.

-- Anonymous 01/10/10 (Sun) 01:05:39 No. 187584476
Good, I could use some dinner after Frank's momentous
display of stupidity.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (2 children)

Sometimes, 4chan is the most magical place on earth... sometimes...

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Mostly it's just racism and kiddie porn though, peppered with awful grammar and horrible spelling... mostly...

[–]surfnaked 4 points5 points  (5 children)

That's more intelligent discourse then I knew existed at 4chan. Ever.

[–][deleted] 49 points50 points  (4 children)

Heavily edited. It's almost certain that this is just one guy (AKA 'samefag') making these comments. And you can see in the pic he has a 4chan extension that lets you hide comments, which were probably a dozen pictures of cocks in between the dog dialogs.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I KNOW for a fact there were countless cock pics in that thread. I Tyler Durdened them.

[–]surfnaked 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Ah such cynics we are. Sounded good though.

[–]fuzzybunn 1 point2 points  (1 child)

When it comes to 4chan, I think "realistic" is a better description of our expectations than "cynical".

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

what board is this? i see screenshots of awesome threads like these but hardly ever stumble upon them while browsing 4chan

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I propose that what made America great was an abundance of natural resources and an incompetent government (by design) that took a few hundred years before it could manage to wedge itself in between competent people exploiting those resources. Now that government is firmly wedged in, the run is over.

That anonymous pug couldn't be any truer.