- published: 30 Apr 2014
- views: 28432
Create your page here
-
remove the playlistRoe V. Wade
-
remove the playlistLongest Videos
- remove the playlistRoe V. Wade
- remove the playlistLongest Videos
back to playlist
A direct explanation of the 1973 Supreme Court Decision which legalized abortion across the country without any of the politics, bias or controversy. www.youtube.com/hiphughes
In 1973, the Supreme Court delivers its opinion on abortion. With Roe v. Wade, states can no longer intervene in the abortion question decided between the patient and her doctor exclusively.
- published: 01 Dec 2008
- views: 86466
Abortion's been legal in America for more than 40 years but the debate ain't over yet. We explain the case that started it all and tell you who the hell was Roe and why did he -or she!- sued Wade.
More on Roe v Wade:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade
Abortion in America:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_the_United_States
Abortion State-by-State, a Map:
http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/maps-of-access-to-abortion-by-state/
Abortion Facts:
http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/18/health/abortion-fast-facts/
Pro-Choice Info:
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/
Pro-Life Info:
http://www.operationrescue.org/about-abortion/abortions-in-america/
Abortion-related Health and Medical info:
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002912.htm
Visit us at:
www.maspolitica.com
Write to Paola:
paola@maspolitica.com
Write to Rolo:
rolo@maspolitica.com
THANKS FOR WATCHING
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE AND LEAVE US A COMMENT
SHARE WITH FRIENDS AND LOVERS
KEEP WATCHING!
- published: 12 Sep 2014
- views: 1656
Justice Antonin Scalia talks to CNN's Piers Morgan about Roe v. Wade and abortion rights.
For more CNN videos, check out our YouTube channel at http://www.youtube.com/cnn
Or visit our site at http://www.cnn.com/video/
- published: 19 Jul 2012
- views: 27846
SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) Justices discuss abortion, judicial philosophy and when a prior case should be overturned in interviews, discussions and lectures. Their insights are surprising and enlightening from a variety of perspectives. Their comments bring up pressing questions for us today:
1.) Should the Supreme Court 'create' law in the way they interpret and apply the constitution?
2.) Was Roe correctly decided in the first place, or was there a better way to decide that case?
3.) Should Roe be overturned?
Roe v Wade was the SCOTUS decision in January of 1973 that along with Doe v Bolton overturned the laws in every state that were protecting the human in the womb by prohibiting/restricting abortion. The Roe decision created a trimester framework that prevented the peoples representatives at the state and federal level from passing laws prohibiting abortion and thereby protecting the human in the womb prior to the 3rd trimester. Planned Parenthood v Casey was decided in 1992 and changed the standard from a trimester framework to a viability standard, allowing states to prohibit abortion only after the human in the womb was deemed viable, based on the technology at the time. Viability is generally agreed to be somewhere between 22-24 weeks, near the end of the second trimester. The question today is, should the people through their representatives be determining the law on abortion (in which case Roe would need to be overturned) or should SCOTUS prevent the people from deciding these laws (in which case Roe should stand)? Currently, there are over 1 million abortions each year. If abortion were added to the CDC leading cause of death list, it would be the leading cause of death. This statistic suggests the question for us today: Is there a better way than Roe?
The Supreme Court is today the last branch of gov't where even though differences clearly exist, the Justices are cordial and even encouraging to one another. I have a great deal of respect for their civility, mutual respect and deep legal insight, even when I don't agree with their decisions. I am grateful for their willingness to share their insights with all of us and I hope their comments will help all of us gain a better appreciation and understanding of the pivotal and powerful role of the Supreme Court.
Please note: This video is for nonprofit educational purposes and contains a variety of small portions of factual works (direct quotes from SCOTUS Justices).
- published: 16 Nov 2014
- views: 18821
This is a documentary that we made for a history project in school. It's about the Court case Roe v. Wade, which deals with the legalization of abortion.
- published: 02 Mar 2011
- views: 20241
Subscribe to our channel http://bit.ly/AJSubscribe
We examine why some states are passing anti-abortion legislation and whether Americans are as divided on this issue as their politicians.
At Al Jazeera English, we focus on people and events that affect people's lives. We bring topics to light that often go under-reported, listening to all sides of the story and giving a 'voice to the voiceless.'
Reaching more than 270 million households in over 140 countries across the globe, our viewers trust Al Jazeera English to keep them informed, inspired, and entertained.
Our impartial, fact-based reporting wins worldwide praise and respect. It is our unique brand of journalism that the world has come to rely on.
We are reshaping global media and constantly working to strengthen our reputation as one of the world's most respected news and current affairs channels.
Social Media links:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/aljazeera
Instagram: https://instagram.com/aljazeera/?ref=...
Twitter: https://twitter.com/ajenglish
Website: http://www.aljazeera.com/
google+: https://plus.google.com/+aljazeera/posts
- published: 29 Jan 2013
- views: 5387
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of abortion. Decided simultaneously with a companion case, Doe v. Bolton, the Court ruled 7--2 that a right to privacy under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman's decision to have an abortion, but that right must be balanced against the state's two legitimate interests in regulating abortions: protecting prenatal life and protecting women's health. Arguing that these state interests became stronger over the course of a pregnancy, the Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of abortion to the trimester of pregnancy.
The Court later rejected Roe's trimester framework, while affirming Roe's central holding that a person has a right to abortion until viability. The Roe decision defined "viable" as being "potentially able to live outside the mother's womb, albeit with artificial aid", adding that viability "is usually placed at about seven months (28 weeks) but may occur earlier, even at 24 weeks."
In disallowing many state and federal restrictions on abortion in the United States, Roe v. Wade prompted a national debate that continues today, about issues including whether and to what extent abortion should be legal, who should decide the legality of abortion, what methods the Supreme Court should use in constitutional adjudication, and what the role should be of religious and moral views in the political sphere. Roe v. Wade reshaped national politics, dividing much of the United States into pro-choice and pro-life camps, while activating grassroots movements on both sides.
According to the Court, "the restrictive criminal abortion laws in effect in a majority of States today are of relatively recent vintage." In 1821, Connecticut passed the first state statute criminalizing abortion. Every state had abortion legislation by 1900.[5] In the United States, abortion was sometimes considered a common law crime,[6] though Justice Blackmun would conclude that the criminalization of abortion did not have "roots in the English common-law tradition."[7]
Prior history of the case
In June 1969, Norma L. McCorvey discovered she was pregnant with her third child. She returned to Dallas, Texas, where friends advised her to assert falsely that she had been raped in order to obtain a legal abortion (with the understanding that Texas law allowed abortion in cases of rape and incest). However, this scheme failed because there was no police report documenting the alleged rape. She attempted to obtain an illegal abortion, but found the unauthorized site had been closed down by the police. Eventually, she was referred to attorneys Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington.[8] (McCorvey would give birth before the case was decided.)
In 1970, Coffee and Weddington filed suit in a U.S. District Court in Texas on behalf of McCorvey (under the alias Jane Roe). The defendant in the case was Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade, representing the State of Texas. McCorvey was no longer claiming her pregnancy was the result of rape, and later acknowledged that she had lied about having been raped.[9][10] "Rape" is not mentioned in the judicial opinions in this case.[11]
The district court ruled in McCorvey's favor on the legal merits of her case, and declined to grant an injunction against the enforcement of the laws barring abortion.[11] The district court's decision was based upon the 9th Amendment, and the court relied upon a concurring opinion by Justice Arthur Goldberg in the 1965 Supreme Court case of Griswold v. Connecticut,[12] finding in the decision for a right to privacy.[13]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v_wade
- published: 06 Aug 2013
- views: 5498
"Jane Roe" of Roe v. Wade is now a pro-life activist. Watch her commercial about it, which aired in January 2013 in the Diocese of Lexington, KY.
- published: 09 Jan 2013
- views: 11248
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of abortion. Decided simultaneously with a companion case, Doe v. Bolton, the Court ruled that a right to privacy under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman's decision to have an abortion, but that right must be balanced against the state's two legitimate interests in regulating abortions: protecting prenatal life and protecting women's health. Arguing that these state interests became stronger over the course of a pregnancy, the Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of abortion to the trimester of pregnancy.
The Court later rejected Roe's trimester framework, while affirming Roe's central holding that a person has a right to abortion until viability. The Roe decision defined "viable" as being "potentially able to live outside the mother's womb, albeit with artificial aid", adding that viability "is usually placed at about seven months (28 weeks) but may occur earlier, even at 24 weeks."
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which means that you can copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license.
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which means that you can copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license.
- Loading...
-
10:52Roe vs Wade Explained: US History Review
Roe vs Wade Explained: US History ReviewRoe vs Wade Explained: US History Review
A direct explanation of the 1973 Supreme Court Decision which legalized abortion across the country without any of the politics, bias or controversy. www.youtube.com/hiphughes -
3:39Roe v. Wade in PBS' The Supreme Court
Roe v. Wade in PBS' The Supreme CourtRoe v. Wade in PBS' The Supreme Court
In 1973, the Supreme Court delivers its opinion on abortion. With Roe v. Wade, states can no longer intervene in the abortion question decided between the patient and her doctor exclusively. -
29:57Roe v Wade: 40 Years On... The Legal History & Future of Reproductive Rights
Roe v Wade: 40 Years On... The Legal History & Future of Reproductive RightsRoe v Wade: 40 Years On... The Legal History & Future of Reproductive Rights
For more information, visit LawJournalTV.com. -
7:40Roe v Wade - Episode 6
Roe v Wade - Episode 6Roe v Wade - Episode 6
Abortion's been legal in America for more than 40 years but the debate ain't over yet. We explain the case that started it all and tell you who the hell was Roe and why did he -or she!- sued Wade. More on Roe v Wade: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade Abortion in America: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_the_United_States Abortion State-by-State, a Map: http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/maps-of-access-to-abortion-by-state/ Abortion Facts: http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/18/health/abortion-fast-facts/ Pro-Choice Info: http://www.plannedparenthood.org/ Pro-Life Info: http://www.operationrescue.org/about-abortion/abortions-in-america/ Abortion-related Health and Medical info: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002912.htm Visit us at: www.maspolitica.com Write to Paola: paola@maspolitica.com Write to Rolo: rolo@maspolitica.com THANKS FOR WATCHING PLEASE SUBSCRIBE AND LEAVE US A COMMENT SHARE WITH FRIENDS AND LOVERS KEEP WATCHING! -
3:09Justice Antonin Scalia talks about Roe v. Wade.
Justice Antonin Scalia talks about Roe v. Wade.Justice Antonin Scalia talks about Roe v. Wade.
Justice Antonin Scalia talks to CNN's Piers Morgan about Roe v. Wade and abortion rights. For more CNN videos, check out our YouTube channel at http://www.youtube.com/cnn Or visit our site at http://www.cnn.com/video/ -
1:20Roe v. Wade
Roe v. WadeRoe v. Wade
The key to defeating Roe v. Wade is Personhood. -
60:21Supreme Court Justices on Roe v. Wade
Supreme Court Justices on Roe v. WadeSupreme Court Justices on Roe v. Wade
SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) Justices discuss abortion, judicial philosophy and when a prior case should be overturned in interviews, discussions and lectures. Their insights are surprising and enlightening from a variety of perspectives. Their comments bring up pressing questions for us today: 1.) Should the Supreme Court 'create' law in the way they interpret and apply the constitution? 2.) Was Roe correctly decided in the first place, or was there a better way to decide that case? 3.) Should Roe be overturned? Roe v Wade was the SCOTUS decision in January of 1973 that along with Doe v Bolton overturned the laws in every state that were protecting the human in the womb by prohibiting/restricting abortion. The Roe decision created a trimester framework that prevented the peoples representatives at the state and federal level from passing laws prohibiting abortion and thereby protecting the human in the womb prior to the 3rd trimester. Planned Parenthood v Casey was decided in 1992 and changed the standard from a trimester framework to a viability standard, allowing states to prohibit abortion only after the human in the womb was deemed viable, based on the technology at the time. Viability is generally agreed to be somewhere between 22-24 weeks, near the end of the second trimester. The question today is, should the people through their representatives be determining the law on abortion (in which case Roe would need to be overturned) or should SCOTUS prevent the people from deciding these laws (in which case Roe should stand)? Currently, there are over 1 million abortions each year. If abortion were added to the CDC leading cause of death list, it would be the leading cause of death. This statistic suggests the question for us today: Is there a better way than Roe? The Supreme Court is today the last branch of gov't where even though differences clearly exist, the Justices are cordial and even encouraging to one another. I have a great deal of respect for their civility, mutual respect and deep legal insight, even when I don't agree with their decisions. I am grateful for their willingness to share their insights with all of us and I hope their comments will help all of us gain a better appreciation and understanding of the pivotal and powerful role of the Supreme Court. Please note: This video is for nonprofit educational purposes and contains a variety of small portions of factual works (direct quotes from SCOTUS Justices). -
8:03Roe v. Wade Documentary
Roe v. Wade DocumentaryRoe v. Wade Documentary
This is a documentary that we made for a history project in school. It's about the Court case Roe v. Wade, which deals with the legalization of abortion. -
35:46Roe v. Wade, 40 years later
Roe v. Wade, 40 years laterRoe v. Wade, 40 years later
Subscribe to our channel http://bit.ly/AJSubscribe We examine why some states are passing anti-abortion legislation and whether Americans are as divided on this issue as their politicians. At Al Jazeera English, we focus on people and events that affect people's lives. We bring topics to light that often go under-reported, listening to all sides of the story and giving a 'voice to the voiceless.' Reaching more than 270 million households in over 140 countries across the globe, our viewers trust Al Jazeera English to keep them informed, inspired, and entertained. Our impartial, fact-based reporting wins worldwide praise and respect. It is our unique brand of journalism that the world has come to rely on. We are reshaping global media and constantly working to strengthen our reputation as one of the world's most respected news and current affairs channels. Social Media links: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/aljazeera Instagram: https://instagram.com/aljazeera/?ref=... Twitter: https://twitter.com/ajenglish Website: http://www.aljazeera.com/ google+: https://plus.google.com/+aljazeera/posts -
8:30Before Roe v. Wade: Personal Stories
Before Roe v. Wade: Personal Stories -
64:43Roe v. Wade: U.S. Supreme Court - Lawyers Present Oral Arguments (1971)
Roe v. Wade: U.S. Supreme Court - Lawyers Present Oral Arguments (1971)Roe v. Wade: U.S. Supreme Court - Lawyers Present Oral Arguments (1971)
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of abortion. Decided simultaneously with a companion case, Doe v. Bolton, the Court ruled 7--2 that a right to privacy under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman's decision to have an abortion, but that right must be balanced against the state's two legitimate interests in regulating abortions: protecting prenatal life and protecting women's health. Arguing that these state interests became stronger over the course of a pregnancy, the Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of abortion to the trimester of pregnancy. The Court later rejected Roe's trimester framework, while affirming Roe's central holding that a person has a right to abortion until viability. The Roe decision defined "viable" as being "potentially able to live outside the mother's womb, albeit with artificial aid", adding that viability "is usually placed at about seven months (28 weeks) but may occur earlier, even at 24 weeks." In disallowing many state and federal restrictions on abortion in the United States, Roe v. Wade prompted a national debate that continues today, about issues including whether and to what extent abortion should be legal, who should decide the legality of abortion, what methods the Supreme Court should use in constitutional adjudication, and what the role should be of religious and moral views in the political sphere. Roe v. Wade reshaped national politics, dividing much of the United States into pro-choice and pro-life camps, while activating grassroots movements on both sides. According to the Court, "the restrictive criminal abortion laws in effect in a majority of States today are of relatively recent vintage." In 1821, Connecticut passed the first state statute criminalizing abortion. Every state had abortion legislation by 1900.[5] In the United States, abortion was sometimes considered a common law crime,[6] though Justice Blackmun would conclude that the criminalization of abortion did not have "roots in the English common-law tradition."[7] Prior history of the case In June 1969, Norma L. McCorvey discovered she was pregnant with her third child. She returned to Dallas, Texas, where friends advised her to assert falsely that she had been raped in order to obtain a legal abortion (with the understanding that Texas law allowed abortion in cases of rape and incest). However, this scheme failed because there was no police report documenting the alleged rape. She attempted to obtain an illegal abortion, but found the unauthorized site had been closed down by the police. Eventually, she was referred to attorneys Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington.[8] (McCorvey would give birth before the case was decided.) In 1970, Coffee and Weddington filed suit in a U.S. District Court in Texas on behalf of McCorvey (under the alias Jane Roe). The defendant in the case was Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade, representing the State of Texas. McCorvey was no longer claiming her pregnancy was the result of rape, and later acknowledged that she had lied about having been raped.[9][10] "Rape" is not mentioned in the judicial opinions in this case.[11] The district court ruled in McCorvey's favor on the legal merits of her case, and declined to grant an injunction against the enforcement of the laws barring abortion.[11] The district court's decision was based upon the 9th Amendment, and the court relied upon a concurring opinion by Justice Arthur Goldberg in the 1965 Supreme Court case of Griswold v. Connecticut,[12] finding in the decision for a right to privacy.[13] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v_wade -
1:03Norma ("Jane Roe" of Roe v. Wade) Speaks About Being Pro-Life
Norma ("Jane Roe" of Roe v. Wade) Speaks About Being Pro-LifeNorma ("Jane Roe" of Roe v. Wade) Speaks About Being Pro-Life
"Jane Roe" of Roe v. Wade is now a pro-life activist. Watch her commercial about it, which aired in January 2013 in the Diocese of Lexington, KY. -
10:25Roe v. Wade: The Debate over Abortion
Roe v. Wade: The Debate over AbortionRoe v. Wade: The Debate over Abortion
I created this documentary for the 2014 National History Day NJ State Competition. The film focuses on the impact of social movements on the abortion debate. The theme of the competition was Rights and Responsibilities. Special thanks to Susan Frietsche, Senior Staff Attorney at the Women's Law Project, for her expertise and insight on this topic. The film won the Senior Individual Documentary Category at the NJ Northern regional competition. -
10:01Roe v. Wade and The United States Abortion Debate
Roe v. Wade and The United States Abortion DebateRoe v. Wade and The United States Abortion Debate
Ten minute documentary for National History Day on the abortion debate in the Untied States. Takes a look at cases such as Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton, as well as Supreme Court decisions on contraceptives and abortion leading up to the Roe and Doe cases.
- Abortifacient
- Abortion
- Abortion debate
- Abortion in Albania
- Abortion in Andorra
- Abortion in Bolivia
- Abortion in Brazil
- Abortion in Canada
- Abortion in Chile
- Abortion in China
- Abortion in Colombia
- Abortion in Ecuador
- Abortion in Estonia
- Abortion in Finland
- Abortion in France
- Abortion in Germany
- Abortion in Guyana
- Abortion in Iceland
- Abortion in India
- Abortion in Iran
- Abortion in Israel
- Abortion in Italy
- Abortion in Japan
- Abortion in Malta
- Abortion in Mexico
- Abortion in Namibia
- Abortion in Norway
- Abortion in Panama
- Abortion in Paraguay
- Abortion in Peru
- Abortion in Poland
- Abortion in Romania
- Abortion in Russia
- Abortion in Suriname
- Abortion in Sweden
- Abortion law
- Adjudication
- Advisory opinion
- Alan Dershowitz
- Anthony Kennedy
- Anthony M. Kennedy
- Antonin Scalia
- Archibald Cox
- Arthur Goldberg
- Balancing test
- Barack Obama
- Benjamin Wittes
- Bill Clinton
- Birth control
- Byron R. White
- Byron White
- Case or controversy
- Cass Sunstein
- Certiorari
- Charlie Savage
- Clarence Thomas
- Commerce Clause
- Common law
- Conception (biology)
- Constitution Avenue
- Cubism
- Dallas, Texas
- David Garrow
- Doe v. Bolton
- Donald T. Critchlow
- Due process
- Edith Jones
- Edward Lazarus
- Erwin Chemerinsky
- Eugenics
- Federal law
- Feminist
- Fertilization
- Fetal rights
- Fetal viability
- Fifth Circuit
- Forced abortion
- Fundamental right
- Gallup poll
- George H.W. Bush
- George W. Bush
- Gerald Ford
- Gonzales v. Carhart
- Google Books
- Grassroots
- Harris Interactive
- Harris v. McRae
- Harry Blackmun
- Harvard Law Review
- Henry Wade
- History of abortion
- Hugo Black
- Hyde Amendment
- Hysterotomy abortion
- Informed consent
- Injunction
- Islam and abortion
- Jack Balkin
- James Wilson
- Jeffrey Rosen
- Jimmy Carter
- John Doe
- John G. Roberts
- John Hart Ely
- John Paul Stevens
- Joseph McKenna
- JSTOR
- Judaism and abortion
- Kermit Roosevelt III
- Late-term abortion
- Laurence Tribe
- Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
- Limit of viability
- Linda Coffee
- Linda Greenhouse
- Los Angeles Times
- Lyndon B. Johnson
- Mayo Clinic
- McCorvey v. Hill
- Medicaid
- Men's rights
- Menstrual extraction
- Merit (legal)
- Michael Kinsley
- Michigan Law Review
- Mifepristone
- Minors and abortion
- Miranda v. Arizona
- Miscegenation
- Misoprostol
- Mootness
- Morality
- Nebraska
- New York Times
- Nina Totenberg
- Nixon tapes
- Norma McCorvey
- One-child policy
- Parental consent
- Person
- Peter Bourne
- Pew Research Center
- Plurality (voting)
- Portal Medicine
- Potter Stewart
- Prenatal development
- Privacy
- Pro-choice
- Pro-life
- Protest
- Quickening
- R. v. Morgentaler
- Religion
- Reproductive rights
- Richard Nixon
- Richard Ostling
- Robert Bork
- Robert C. Flowers
- Roe v. Wade
- Ronald Reagan
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg
- Samuel Alito
- Sandra Day O'Connor
- Sarah Weddington
- Sidewalk counseling
- Simon & Schuster
- Standing (law)
- State law
- Stenberg v. Carhart
- Strict scrutiny
- Stuart Taylor Jr.
- Talk Roe v. Wade
- Template Abortion
- The Daily Telegraph
- The Economist
- The New York Times
- The News & Observer
- The Plain Dealer
- Thurgood Marshall
- Times Books
- Trigger law
- Unsafe abortion
- Vacuum aspiration
- Viability (fetal)
- Warren Burger
- Warren E. Burger
- Washington D.C.
- Washington Times
- Washington, D.C.
- Watergate scandal
- Wayback Machine
- Wikipedia Media help
- Wikiquote Abortion
- Wikisource
- Wikiversity Abortion
- Wiktionary Abortion
- William Blackstone
- William H. Rehnquist
- William O. Douglas
- William Rehnquist
- William Saletan
- Women's rights
- WP NPOVD
- Yale Law Journal
- Younger v. Harris
- Alan Dershowitz
- Anthony Kennedy
- Antonin Scalia
- Archibald Cox
- Arthur Goldberg
- Barack Obama
- Benjamin Wittes
- Bill Clinton
- Byron White
- Cass Sunstein
- Charlie Savage
- Clarence Thomas
- David Garrow
- Edith Jones
- Edward Lazarus
- Erwin Chemerinsky
- Gerald Ford
- Harry Blackmun
- Henry Wade
- Hugo Black
- Jack Balkin
- James Wilson
- Jeffrey Rosen
- Jimmy Carter
- John Hart Ely
- John Paul Stevens
- Joseph McKenna
- Kermit Roosevelt III
- Laurence Tribe
- Linda Coffee
- Linda Greenhouse
- Michael Kinsley
- Nina Totenberg
- Norma McCorvey
- Person
- Peter Bourne
- Potter Stewart
- Richard Nixon
- Robert Bork
- Ronald Reagan
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg
- Samuel Alito
- Sarah Weddington
- Thurgood Marshall
- William Blackstone
- William Rehnquist
- William Saletan
-
Roe vs Wade Explained: US History Review
A direct explanation of the 1973 Supreme Court Decision which legalized abortion across the country without any of the politics, bias or controversy. www.youtube.com/hiphughes -
Roe v. Wade in PBS' The Supreme Court
In 1973, the Supreme Court delivers its opinion on abortion. With Roe v. Wade, states can no longer intervene in the abortion question decided between the patient and her doctor exclusively. -
Roe v Wade: 40 Years On... The Legal History & Future of Reproductive Rights
For more information, visit LawJournalTV.com. -
Roe v Wade - Episode 6
Abortion's been legal in America for more than 40 years but the debate ain't over yet. We explain the case that started it all and tell you who the hell was Roe and why did he -or she!- sued Wade. More on Roe v Wade: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade Abortion in America: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_the_United_States Abortion State-by-State, a Map: http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/maps-of-access-to-abortion-by-state/ Abortion Facts: http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/18/health/abortion-fast-facts/ Pro-Choice Info: http://www.plannedparenthood.org/ Pro-Life Info: http://www.operationrescue.org/about-abortion/abortions-in-america/ Abortion-related Health and Medical info: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002912.htm Visit us at: www.maspolitica.com Write t... -
Justice Antonin Scalia talks about Roe v. Wade.
Justice Antonin Scalia talks to CNN's Piers Morgan about Roe v. Wade and abortion rights. For more CNN videos, check out our YouTube channel at http://www.youtube.com/cnn Or visit our site at http://www.cnn.com/video/ -
Roe v. Wade
The key to defeating Roe v. Wade is Personhood. -
Supreme Court Justices on Roe v. Wade
SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) Justices discuss abortion, judicial philosophy and when a prior case should be overturned in interviews, discussions and lectures. Their insights are surprising and enlightening from a variety of perspectives. Their comments bring up pressing questions for us today: 1.) Should the Supreme Court 'create' law in the way they interpret and apply the constitution? 2.) Was Roe correctly decided in the first place, or was there a better way to decide that case? 3.) Should Roe be overturned? Roe v Wade was the SCOTUS decision in January of 1973 that along with Doe v Bolton overturned the laws in every state that were protecting the human in the womb by prohibiting/restricting abortion. The Roe decision created a trimester framework that prevented th... -
Roe v. Wade Documentary
This is a documentary that we made for a history project in school. It's about the Court case Roe v. Wade, which deals with the legalization of abortion. -
Roe v. Wade, 40 years later
Subscribe to our channel http://bit.ly/AJSubscribe We examine why some states are passing anti-abortion legislation and whether Americans are as divided on this issue as their politicians. At Al Jazeera English, we focus on people and events that affect people's lives. We bring topics to light that often go under-reported, listening to all sides of the story and giving a 'voice to the voiceless.' Reaching more than 270 million households in over 140 countries across the globe, our viewers trust Al Jazeera English to keep them informed, inspired, and entertained. Our impartial, fact-based reporting wins worldwide praise and respect. It is our unique brand of journalism that the world has come to rely on. We are reshaping global media and constantly working to strengthen our reputation as ... -
-
Roe v. Wade: U.S. Supreme Court - Lawyers Present Oral Arguments (1971)
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of abortion. Decided simultaneously with a companion case, Doe v. Bolton, the Court ruled 7--2 that a right to privacy under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman's decision to have an abortion, but that right must be balanced against the state's two legitimate interests in regulating abortions: protecting prenatal life and protecting women's health. Arguing that these state interests became stronger over the course of a pregnancy, the Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of abortion to the trimester of pregnancy. The Court later rejected Roe's trimester framework, while affirming Roe's central holding that a person has a right to abor... -
Norma ("Jane Roe" of Roe v. Wade) Speaks About Being Pro-Life
"Jane Roe" of Roe v. Wade is now a pro-life activist. Watch her commercial about it, which aired in January 2013 in the Diocese of Lexington, KY. -
Roe v. Wade: The Debate over Abortion
I created this documentary for the 2014 National History Day NJ State Competition. The film focuses on the impact of social movements on the abortion debate. The theme of the competition was Rights and Responsibilities. Special thanks to Susan Frietsche, Senior Staff Attorney at the Women's Law Project, for her expertise and insight on this topic. The film won the Senior Individual Documentary Category at the NJ Northern regional competition. -
Roe v. Wade and The United States Abortion Debate
Ten minute documentary for National History Day on the abortion debate in the Untied States. Takes a look at cases such as Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton, as well as Supreme Court decisions on contraceptives and abortion leading up to the Roe and Doe cases. -
Roe v. Wade 40th Anniversary: Reproductive Justice for Women's Health-- Planned Parenthood
This year marks the 40-year anniversary of Roe v. Wade. That's 40 years of protecting every woman's fundamental right to make her own personal medical decisions. Forty years of ensuring that abortion remains a safe and legal procedure for a woman to consider, if she needs it. But plenty of politicians are still fighting to take that right away. Abortion and politics shouldn't still be an issue. We won't let them get away with it. On this 40th anniversary, those of us who trust women, who value women's health and rights, have something to tell them: Roe is here for good. Learn more: http://bit.ly/U6fArY Transcript: ©2013 Planned Parenthood® Federation of America "ROE V. WADE 40TH ANNIVERSARY: REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE FOR WOMEN'S HEALTH-- PLANNED PARENTHOOD" - VIDEO TRANSCRIPT: TEXT: 40 Ye... -
Obama / McCain 3rd Debate, Part 6 - Roe v. Wade
Barack Obama and John McCain third debate highlights -
Roe v. Wade Clip from the series "A History of the U.S. Constitution"
Explains the Supreme Court's controversial decision legalizing abortion. From the series "A History of the U.S. Constitution." Buy it now: DVD http://www.ambrosevideo.com/displayitem.cfm?vid=1172 Video Stream http://www.ambrosedigital.com/index.php?page=shop.product_details&flypage;=shop.flypage_ambrose&option;=com_virtuemart&Itemid;=59&product;_id=2782 -
-
Constitutional Attorney Destroys Roe v. Wade!
This interview is a pre-recorded segment with Dr. Herb Titus that was aired at the #endabortionnow event in Phoenix, AZ. In this interview Dr. Titus explains how Roe v Wade can and should be overturned at a state level without the need to wait for new supreme court justices This is a very important conversation that people need to hear. Especially those who are actively involved in the work of pro-life legislation. Please share this with your friends, state legislators, and others who are involved in the pro-life fight. -
Palin, Biden On Roe V. Wade
Katie Couric sat down with Sarah Palin and Joe Biden and asked them their thoughts on Roe v. Wade. -
The Abortion Case That Could Overturn Roe v. Wade
In this excerpt (watch the full interview here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FndPWY_5A3A ) Sunsara Taylor and Dennis Trainor, Jr discuss the challenge to Roe v Wade that the Supreme Court will consider in 2016. From Think Progress: The Abortion Case That Could Overturn Roe v. Wade Has A Lot Of Opponents by by Alex Zielinski A looming Supreme Court case that could severely undermine the right to an abortion has attracted an unprecedented amount of opposition from across the country. A slew of organizations and individuals filed 45 legal briefs in the Supreme Court on Tuesday, each brief examining the case through a unique lens and each coming to the same conclusion: State laws that restrict abortion access are unconstitutional. The case will examine the validity of a Texas law, known... -
Ginsburg: Roe V. Wade Went Too Far
Thom Hartmann talks about U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg saying she feels The U.S. Supreme Court's decision on abortion was too sweeping and gave opponents a symbol to target. If you liked this clip of The Thom Hartmann Program, please do us a big favor and share it with your friends... and hit that "like" button! http://www.thomhartmann.com Follow Us on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/thom_hartmann Subscribe to The Thom Hartmann Program for more: http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=thomhartmann -
Roe v. Wade | quimbee.com
An animated case brief of Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973). Read the text case brief at https://www.quimbee.com/cases/roe-v-wade
Roe vs Wade Explained: US History Review
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 10:52
- Updated: 30 Apr 2014
- views: 28432
A direct explanation of the 1973 Supreme Court Decision which legalized abortion across the country without any of the politics, bias or controversy. www.youtub...
A direct explanation of the 1973 Supreme Court Decision which legalized abortion across the country without any of the politics, bias or controversy. www.youtube.com/hiphughes
wn.com/Roe Vs Wade Explained US History Review
A direct explanation of the 1973 Supreme Court Decision which legalized abortion across the country without any of the politics, bias or controversy. www.youtube.com/hiphughes
- published: 30 Apr 2014
- views: 28432
Roe v. Wade in PBS' The Supreme Court
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 3:39
- Updated: 01 Dec 2008
- views: 86466
In 1973, the Supreme Court delivers its opinion on abortion. With Roe v. Wade, states can no longer intervene in the abortion question decided between the patie...
In 1973, the Supreme Court delivers its opinion on abortion. With Roe v. Wade, states can no longer intervene in the abortion question decided between the patient and her doctor exclusively.
wn.com/Roe V. Wade In Pbs' The Supreme Court
In 1973, the Supreme Court delivers its opinion on abortion. With Roe v. Wade, states can no longer intervene in the abortion question decided between the patient and her doctor exclusively.
- published: 01 Dec 2008
- views: 86466
Roe v Wade: 40 Years On... The Legal History & Future of Reproductive Rights
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 29:57
- Updated: 25 Feb 2013
- views: 8443
For more information, visit LawJournalTV.com.
For more information, visit LawJournalTV.com.
wn.com/Roe V Wade 40 Years On... The Legal History Future Of Reproductive Rights
For more information, visit LawJournalTV.com.
- published: 25 Feb 2013
- views: 8443
Roe v Wade - Episode 6
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 7:40
- Updated: 12 Sep 2014
- views: 1656
Abortion's been legal in America for more than 40 years but the debate ain't over yet. We explain the case that started it all and tell you who the hell was Roe...
Abortion's been legal in America for more than 40 years but the debate ain't over yet. We explain the case that started it all and tell you who the hell was Roe and why did he -or she!- sued Wade.
More on Roe v Wade:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade
Abortion in America:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_the_United_States
Abortion State-by-State, a Map:
http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/maps-of-access-to-abortion-by-state/
Abortion Facts:
http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/18/health/abortion-fast-facts/
Pro-Choice Info:
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/
Pro-Life Info:
http://www.operationrescue.org/about-abortion/abortions-in-america/
Abortion-related Health and Medical info:
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002912.htm
Visit us at:
www.maspolitica.com
Write to Paola:
paola@maspolitica.com
Write to Rolo:
rolo@maspolitica.com
THANKS FOR WATCHING
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE AND LEAVE US A COMMENT
SHARE WITH FRIENDS AND LOVERS
KEEP WATCHING!
wn.com/Roe V Wade Episode 6
Abortion's been legal in America for more than 40 years but the debate ain't over yet. We explain the case that started it all and tell you who the hell was Roe and why did he -or she!- sued Wade.
More on Roe v Wade:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade
Abortion in America:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_the_United_States
Abortion State-by-State, a Map:
http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/maps-of-access-to-abortion-by-state/
Abortion Facts:
http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/18/health/abortion-fast-facts/
Pro-Choice Info:
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/
Pro-Life Info:
http://www.operationrescue.org/about-abortion/abortions-in-america/
Abortion-related Health and Medical info:
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002912.htm
Visit us at:
www.maspolitica.com
Write to Paola:
paola@maspolitica.com
Write to Rolo:
rolo@maspolitica.com
THANKS FOR WATCHING
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE AND LEAVE US A COMMENT
SHARE WITH FRIENDS AND LOVERS
KEEP WATCHING!
- published: 12 Sep 2014
- views: 1656
Justice Antonin Scalia talks about Roe v. Wade.
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 3:09
- Updated: 19 Jul 2012
- views: 27846
Justice Antonin Scalia talks to CNN's Piers Morgan about Roe v. Wade and abortion rights.
For more CNN videos, check out our YouTube channel at http://www.yout...
Justice Antonin Scalia talks to CNN's Piers Morgan about Roe v. Wade and abortion rights.
For more CNN videos, check out our YouTube channel at http://www.youtube.com/cnn
Or visit our site at http://www.cnn.com/video/
wn.com/Justice Antonin Scalia Talks About Roe V. Wade.
Justice Antonin Scalia talks to CNN's Piers Morgan about Roe v. Wade and abortion rights.
For more CNN videos, check out our YouTube channel at http://www.youtube.com/cnn
Or visit our site at http://www.cnn.com/video/
- published: 19 Jul 2012
- views: 27846
Roe v. Wade
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:20
- Updated: 13 Sep 2011
- views: 24427
The key to defeating Roe v. Wade is Personhood.
The key to defeating Roe v. Wade is Personhood.
wn.com/Roe V. Wade
Supreme Court Justices on Roe v. Wade
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 60:21
- Updated: 16 Nov 2014
- views: 18821
SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) Justices discuss abortion, judicial philosophy and when a prior case should be overturned in interviews, discussions...
SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) Justices discuss abortion, judicial philosophy and when a prior case should be overturned in interviews, discussions and lectures. Their insights are surprising and enlightening from a variety of perspectives. Their comments bring up pressing questions for us today:
1.) Should the Supreme Court 'create' law in the way they interpret and apply the constitution?
2.) Was Roe correctly decided in the first place, or was there a better way to decide that case?
3.) Should Roe be overturned?
Roe v Wade was the SCOTUS decision in January of 1973 that along with Doe v Bolton overturned the laws in every state that were protecting the human in the womb by prohibiting/restricting abortion. The Roe decision created a trimester framework that prevented the peoples representatives at the state and federal level from passing laws prohibiting abortion and thereby protecting the human in the womb prior to the 3rd trimester. Planned Parenthood v Casey was decided in 1992 and changed the standard from a trimester framework to a viability standard, allowing states to prohibit abortion only after the human in the womb was deemed viable, based on the technology at the time. Viability is generally agreed to be somewhere between 22-24 weeks, near the end of the second trimester. The question today is, should the people through their representatives be determining the law on abortion (in which case Roe would need to be overturned) or should SCOTUS prevent the people from deciding these laws (in which case Roe should stand)? Currently, there are over 1 million abortions each year. If abortion were added to the CDC leading cause of death list, it would be the leading cause of death. This statistic suggests the question for us today: Is there a better way than Roe?
The Supreme Court is today the last branch of gov't where even though differences clearly exist, the Justices are cordial and even encouraging to one another. I have a great deal of respect for their civility, mutual respect and deep legal insight, even when I don't agree with their decisions. I am grateful for their willingness to share their insights with all of us and I hope their comments will help all of us gain a better appreciation and understanding of the pivotal and powerful role of the Supreme Court.
Please note: This video is for nonprofit educational purposes and contains a variety of small portions of factual works (direct quotes from SCOTUS Justices).
wn.com/Supreme Court Justices On Roe V. Wade
SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) Justices discuss abortion, judicial philosophy and when a prior case should be overturned in interviews, discussions and lectures. Their insights are surprising and enlightening from a variety of perspectives. Their comments bring up pressing questions for us today:
1.) Should the Supreme Court 'create' law in the way they interpret and apply the constitution?
2.) Was Roe correctly decided in the first place, or was there a better way to decide that case?
3.) Should Roe be overturned?
Roe v Wade was the SCOTUS decision in January of 1973 that along with Doe v Bolton overturned the laws in every state that were protecting the human in the womb by prohibiting/restricting abortion. The Roe decision created a trimester framework that prevented the peoples representatives at the state and federal level from passing laws prohibiting abortion and thereby protecting the human in the womb prior to the 3rd trimester. Planned Parenthood v Casey was decided in 1992 and changed the standard from a trimester framework to a viability standard, allowing states to prohibit abortion only after the human in the womb was deemed viable, based on the technology at the time. Viability is generally agreed to be somewhere between 22-24 weeks, near the end of the second trimester. The question today is, should the people through their representatives be determining the law on abortion (in which case Roe would need to be overturned) or should SCOTUS prevent the people from deciding these laws (in which case Roe should stand)? Currently, there are over 1 million abortions each year. If abortion were added to the CDC leading cause of death list, it would be the leading cause of death. This statistic suggests the question for us today: Is there a better way than Roe?
The Supreme Court is today the last branch of gov't where even though differences clearly exist, the Justices are cordial and even encouraging to one another. I have a great deal of respect for their civility, mutual respect and deep legal insight, even when I don't agree with their decisions. I am grateful for their willingness to share their insights with all of us and I hope their comments will help all of us gain a better appreciation and understanding of the pivotal and powerful role of the Supreme Court.
Please note: This video is for nonprofit educational purposes and contains a variety of small portions of factual works (direct quotes from SCOTUS Justices).
- published: 16 Nov 2014
- views: 18821
Roe v. Wade Documentary
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 8:03
- Updated: 02 Mar 2011
- views: 20241
This is a documentary that we made for a history project in school. It's about the Court case Roe v. Wade, which deals with the legalization of abortion.
This is a documentary that we made for a history project in school. It's about the Court case Roe v. Wade, which deals with the legalization of abortion.
wn.com/Roe V. Wade Documentary
This is a documentary that we made for a history project in school. It's about the Court case Roe v. Wade, which deals with the legalization of abortion.
- published: 02 Mar 2011
- views: 20241
Roe v. Wade, 40 years later
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 35:46
- Updated: 29 Jan 2013
- views: 5387
Subscribe to our channel http://bit.ly/AJSubscribe
We examine why some states are passing anti-abortion legislation and whether Americans are as divided on thi...
Subscribe to our channel http://bit.ly/AJSubscribe
We examine why some states are passing anti-abortion legislation and whether Americans are as divided on this issue as their politicians.
At Al Jazeera English, we focus on people and events that affect people's lives. We bring topics to light that often go under-reported, listening to all sides of the story and giving a 'voice to the voiceless.'
Reaching more than 270 million households in over 140 countries across the globe, our viewers trust Al Jazeera English to keep them informed, inspired, and entertained.
Our impartial, fact-based reporting wins worldwide praise and respect. It is our unique brand of journalism that the world has come to rely on.
We are reshaping global media and constantly working to strengthen our reputation as one of the world's most respected news and current affairs channels.
Social Media links:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/aljazeera
Instagram: https://instagram.com/aljazeera/?ref=...
Twitter: https://twitter.com/ajenglish
Website: http://www.aljazeera.com/
google+: https://plus.google.com/+aljazeera/posts
wn.com/Roe V. Wade, 40 Years Later
Subscribe to our channel http://bit.ly/AJSubscribe
We examine why some states are passing anti-abortion legislation and whether Americans are as divided on this issue as their politicians.
At Al Jazeera English, we focus on people and events that affect people's lives. We bring topics to light that often go under-reported, listening to all sides of the story and giving a 'voice to the voiceless.'
Reaching more than 270 million households in over 140 countries across the globe, our viewers trust Al Jazeera English to keep them informed, inspired, and entertained.
Our impartial, fact-based reporting wins worldwide praise and respect. It is our unique brand of journalism that the world has come to rely on.
We are reshaping global media and constantly working to strengthen our reputation as one of the world's most respected news and current affairs channels.
Social Media links:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/aljazeera
Instagram: https://instagram.com/aljazeera/?ref=...
Twitter: https://twitter.com/ajenglish
Website: http://www.aljazeera.com/
google+: https://plus.google.com/+aljazeera/posts
- published: 29 Jan 2013
- views: 5387
Before Roe v. Wade: Personal Stories
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 8:30
- Updated: 07 Sep 2012
- views: 11620
Roe v. Wade: U.S. Supreme Court - Lawyers Present Oral Arguments (1971)
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 64:43
- Updated: 06 Aug 2013
- views: 5498
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of abortion. Decided simultaneously with a companion ca...
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of abortion. Decided simultaneously with a companion case, Doe v. Bolton, the Court ruled 7--2 that a right to privacy under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman's decision to have an abortion, but that right must be balanced against the state's two legitimate interests in regulating abortions: protecting prenatal life and protecting women's health. Arguing that these state interests became stronger over the course of a pregnancy, the Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of abortion to the trimester of pregnancy.
The Court later rejected Roe's trimester framework, while affirming Roe's central holding that a person has a right to abortion until viability. The Roe decision defined "viable" as being "potentially able to live outside the mother's womb, albeit with artificial aid", adding that viability "is usually placed at about seven months (28 weeks) but may occur earlier, even at 24 weeks."
In disallowing many state and federal restrictions on abortion in the United States, Roe v. Wade prompted a national debate that continues today, about issues including whether and to what extent abortion should be legal, who should decide the legality of abortion, what methods the Supreme Court should use in constitutional adjudication, and what the role should be of religious and moral views in the political sphere. Roe v. Wade reshaped national politics, dividing much of the United States into pro-choice and pro-life camps, while activating grassroots movements on both sides.
According to the Court, "the restrictive criminal abortion laws in effect in a majority of States today are of relatively recent vintage." In 1821, Connecticut passed the first state statute criminalizing abortion. Every state had abortion legislation by 1900.[5] In the United States, abortion was sometimes considered a common law crime,[6] though Justice Blackmun would conclude that the criminalization of abortion did not have "roots in the English common-law tradition."[7]
Prior history of the case
In June 1969, Norma L. McCorvey discovered she was pregnant with her third child. She returned to Dallas, Texas, where friends advised her to assert falsely that she had been raped in order to obtain a legal abortion (with the understanding that Texas law allowed abortion in cases of rape and incest). However, this scheme failed because there was no police report documenting the alleged rape. She attempted to obtain an illegal abortion, but found the unauthorized site had been closed down by the police. Eventually, she was referred to attorneys Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington.[8] (McCorvey would give birth before the case was decided.)
In 1970, Coffee and Weddington filed suit in a U.S. District Court in Texas on behalf of McCorvey (under the alias Jane Roe). The defendant in the case was Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade, representing the State of Texas. McCorvey was no longer claiming her pregnancy was the result of rape, and later acknowledged that she had lied about having been raped.[9][10] "Rape" is not mentioned in the judicial opinions in this case.[11]
The district court ruled in McCorvey's favor on the legal merits of her case, and declined to grant an injunction against the enforcement of the laws barring abortion.[11] The district court's decision was based upon the 9th Amendment, and the court relied upon a concurring opinion by Justice Arthur Goldberg in the 1965 Supreme Court case of Griswold v. Connecticut,[12] finding in the decision for a right to privacy.[13]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v_wade
wn.com/Roe V. Wade U.S. Supreme Court Lawyers Present Oral Arguments (1971)
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of abortion. Decided simultaneously with a companion case, Doe v. Bolton, the Court ruled 7--2 that a right to privacy under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman's decision to have an abortion, but that right must be balanced against the state's two legitimate interests in regulating abortions: protecting prenatal life and protecting women's health. Arguing that these state interests became stronger over the course of a pregnancy, the Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of abortion to the trimester of pregnancy.
The Court later rejected Roe's trimester framework, while affirming Roe's central holding that a person has a right to abortion until viability. The Roe decision defined "viable" as being "potentially able to live outside the mother's womb, albeit with artificial aid", adding that viability "is usually placed at about seven months (28 weeks) but may occur earlier, even at 24 weeks."
In disallowing many state and federal restrictions on abortion in the United States, Roe v. Wade prompted a national debate that continues today, about issues including whether and to what extent abortion should be legal, who should decide the legality of abortion, what methods the Supreme Court should use in constitutional adjudication, and what the role should be of religious and moral views in the political sphere. Roe v. Wade reshaped national politics, dividing much of the United States into pro-choice and pro-life camps, while activating grassroots movements on both sides.
According to the Court, "the restrictive criminal abortion laws in effect in a majority of States today are of relatively recent vintage." In 1821, Connecticut passed the first state statute criminalizing abortion. Every state had abortion legislation by 1900.[5] In the United States, abortion was sometimes considered a common law crime,[6] though Justice Blackmun would conclude that the criminalization of abortion did not have "roots in the English common-law tradition."[7]
Prior history of the case
In June 1969, Norma L. McCorvey discovered she was pregnant with her third child. She returned to Dallas, Texas, where friends advised her to assert falsely that she had been raped in order to obtain a legal abortion (with the understanding that Texas law allowed abortion in cases of rape and incest). However, this scheme failed because there was no police report documenting the alleged rape. She attempted to obtain an illegal abortion, but found the unauthorized site had been closed down by the police. Eventually, she was referred to attorneys Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington.[8] (McCorvey would give birth before the case was decided.)
In 1970, Coffee and Weddington filed suit in a U.S. District Court in Texas on behalf of McCorvey (under the alias Jane Roe). The defendant in the case was Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade, representing the State of Texas. McCorvey was no longer claiming her pregnancy was the result of rape, and later acknowledged that she had lied about having been raped.[9][10] "Rape" is not mentioned in the judicial opinions in this case.[11]
The district court ruled in McCorvey's favor on the legal merits of her case, and declined to grant an injunction against the enforcement of the laws barring abortion.[11] The district court's decision was based upon the 9th Amendment, and the court relied upon a concurring opinion by Justice Arthur Goldberg in the 1965 Supreme Court case of Griswold v. Connecticut,[12] finding in the decision for a right to privacy.[13]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v_wade
- published: 06 Aug 2013
- views: 5498
Norma ("Jane Roe" of Roe v. Wade) Speaks About Being Pro-Life
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:03
- Updated: 09 Jan 2013
- views: 11248
"Jane Roe" of Roe v. Wade is now a pro-life activist. Watch her commercial about it, which aired in January 2013 in the Diocese of Lexington, KY.
"Jane Roe" of Roe v. Wade is now a pro-life activist. Watch her commercial about it, which aired in January 2013 in the Diocese of Lexington, KY.
wn.com/Norma ( Jane Roe Of Roe V. Wade) Speaks About Being Pro Life
"Jane Roe" of Roe v. Wade is now a pro-life activist. Watch her commercial about it, which aired in January 2013 in the Diocese of Lexington, KY.
- published: 09 Jan 2013
- views: 11248
Roe v. Wade: The Debate over Abortion
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 10:25
- Updated: 13 Dec 2014
- views: 455
I created this documentary for the 2014 National History Day NJ State Competition. The film focuses on the impact of social movements on the abortion debate. Th...
I created this documentary for the 2014 National History Day NJ State Competition. The film focuses on the impact of social movements on the abortion debate. The theme of the competition was Rights and Responsibilities. Special thanks to Susan Frietsche, Senior Staff Attorney at the Women's Law Project, for her expertise and insight on this topic. The film won the Senior Individual Documentary Category at the NJ Northern regional competition.
wn.com/Roe V. Wade The Debate Over Abortion
I created this documentary for the 2014 National History Day NJ State Competition. The film focuses on the impact of social movements on the abortion debate. The theme of the competition was Rights and Responsibilities. Special thanks to Susan Frietsche, Senior Staff Attorney at the Women's Law Project, for her expertise and insight on this topic. The film won the Senior Individual Documentary Category at the NJ Northern regional competition.
- published: 13 Dec 2014
- views: 455
Roe v. Wade and The United States Abortion Debate
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 10:01
- Updated: 16 Jan 2011
- views: 12686
Ten minute documentary for National History Day on the abortion debate in the Untied States. Takes a look at cases such as Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton, as wel...
Ten minute documentary for National History Day on the abortion debate in the Untied States. Takes a look at cases such as Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton, as well as Supreme Court decisions on contraceptives and abortion leading up to the Roe and Doe cases.
wn.com/Roe V. Wade And The United States Abortion Debate
Ten minute documentary for National History Day on the abortion debate in the Untied States. Takes a look at cases such as Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton, as well as Supreme Court decisions on contraceptives and abortion leading up to the Roe and Doe cases.
- published: 16 Jan 2011
- views: 12686
Roe v. Wade 40th Anniversary: Reproductive Justice for Women's Health-- Planned Parenthood
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 4:16
- Updated: 18 Jan 2013
- views: 13747
This year marks the 40-year anniversary of Roe v. Wade. That's 40 years of protecting every woman's fundamental right to make her own personal medical decisions...
This year marks the 40-year anniversary of Roe v. Wade. That's 40 years of protecting every woman's fundamental right to make her own personal medical decisions. Forty years of ensuring that abortion remains a safe and legal procedure for a woman to consider, if she needs it. But plenty of politicians are still fighting to take that right away. Abortion and politics shouldn't still be an issue.
We won't let them get away with it. On this 40th anniversary, those of us who trust women, who value women's health and rights, have something to tell them: Roe is here for good.
Learn more: http://bit.ly/U6fArY
Transcript:
©2013 Planned Parenthood® Federation of America
"ROE V. WADE 40TH ANNIVERSARY: REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE FOR WOMEN'S HEALTH-- PLANNED PARENTHOOD" - VIDEO TRANSCRIPT:
TEXT: 40 Years, safe and legal
TEXT: In 1965, illegal abortions made up nearly one-fifth of all pregnancy -- and childbirth- related deaths
CECILE RICHARDS: I see doctors across the country all the time who unfortunately remember the days before Roe. They remember women dying in emergency rooms, women who didn't have access to legal abortion. And they are a great important reminder that this is a right that cannot take for granted.
DR. MILDRED HANSON: - To be a patient of an abortionist was a crime in itself. It just didn't make sense, that we would be withholding a safe, legal procedure that would have eliminated all of this heartache and prominent threat to their lives.
DR. EUGENE GLICK: We saw women coming in with incomplete abortions that had been obviously induced.
DR. CURTIS BOYD: Women took chances with their life everyday.
CBS BROADCASTER: In a landmark ruling the supreme court today legalized abortions. The majority in cases from Texas and Georgia said that the decision to end a pregnancy during the first three months belongs to the woman and her doctor- not the government.
TEXT: On January 22, 1973 the U.S. Supreme Court legalized abortion in its decision Roe v. Wade
SARAH WEDDINGTON: There were lots of people all over the country who were having their own celebrations and getting together and talking about how much it would change life// because for women it meant they were the ones to make that decision, not the government.
TEXT: Once made legal--deaths from abortion declined dramatically during the past three decades.
TEXT: Today, less than 0.3 percent of women who end a pregnancy sustain a serious complication.
CECILE RICHARDS: It's also so important on this 40th anniversary of Roe to recognize and appreciate the doctors and clinicians all across the country who take care of women everyday.
TEXT: 40 YEARS SAFE AND LEGAL, BUT THE FIGHT FOR WOMEN'S HEALTH AND RIGHTS CONTINUES.....
CECILE RICHARDS: Even as we celebrate the 40th anniversary and the importance that it's made in the lives of women in America, politicians are still trying to take women's access to healthcare.
SARAH WEDDINGTON: As we move forward, who our elected officials our in terms of the president, the governors, the members of the house and senate at the congressional level, the state level- that becomes, I think, the most important thing because they are the ones who pass the laws who decides what's going to happen.
CECILE RICHARDS: For a long time the pro-life, pro-choice labels have masked the complexity of this topic and how people authentically feel.
DESTINY ROBINSON: Abortion is not a boxed in issue, it's a very complex issues it has a lot of different parts to it, a lot of decision making goes behind a woman deciding to have an abortion so putting a label on it is not fair.
TEXT: 64 percent of voters younger than 30 said that abortion should be legal in all or most cases.
CECILE RICHARDS: A woman needs to be able to make her own decisions in consultations with her doctor, with her family about her pregnancy and we need to keep politicians out of making the most personal and private decisions that a family can make.
TEXT: ON THE 40TH ANNIVERSARY OF ROE V. WADE WOMEN ACROSS GENERATIONS COMMIT...
DESTINY ROBINSON: to make sure I am a young woman who knows the power of making her own decision.
SARAH WEDDINGTON: to continued vigilance, continued protection, continued investment in those principles that we believe in.
CECILE RICHARDS: to make sure that women of my daughter's generation have the same right that I've had in my life.
TEXT: 40 YEARS SAFE AND LEGAL---LET'S KEEP IT THAT WAY.
END
wn.com/Roe V. Wade 40Th Anniversary Reproductive Justice For Women's Health Planned Parenthood
This year marks the 40-year anniversary of Roe v. Wade. That's 40 years of protecting every woman's fundamental right to make her own personal medical decisions. Forty years of ensuring that abortion remains a safe and legal procedure for a woman to consider, if she needs it. But plenty of politicians are still fighting to take that right away. Abortion and politics shouldn't still be an issue.
We won't let them get away with it. On this 40th anniversary, those of us who trust women, who value women's health and rights, have something to tell them: Roe is here for good.
Learn more: http://bit.ly/U6fArY
Transcript:
©2013 Planned Parenthood® Federation of America
"ROE V. WADE 40TH ANNIVERSARY: REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE FOR WOMEN'S HEALTH-- PLANNED PARENTHOOD" - VIDEO TRANSCRIPT:
TEXT: 40 Years, safe and legal
TEXT: In 1965, illegal abortions made up nearly one-fifth of all pregnancy -- and childbirth- related deaths
CECILE RICHARDS: I see doctors across the country all the time who unfortunately remember the days before Roe. They remember women dying in emergency rooms, women who didn't have access to legal abortion. And they are a great important reminder that this is a right that cannot take for granted.
DR. MILDRED HANSON: - To be a patient of an abortionist was a crime in itself. It just didn't make sense, that we would be withholding a safe, legal procedure that would have eliminated all of this heartache and prominent threat to their lives.
DR. EUGENE GLICK: We saw women coming in with incomplete abortions that had been obviously induced.
DR. CURTIS BOYD: Women took chances with their life everyday.
CBS BROADCASTER: In a landmark ruling the supreme court today legalized abortions. The majority in cases from Texas and Georgia said that the decision to end a pregnancy during the first three months belongs to the woman and her doctor- not the government.
TEXT: On January 22, 1973 the U.S. Supreme Court legalized abortion in its decision Roe v. Wade
SARAH WEDDINGTON: There were lots of people all over the country who were having their own celebrations and getting together and talking about how much it would change life// because for women it meant they were the ones to make that decision, not the government.
TEXT: Once made legal--deaths from abortion declined dramatically during the past three decades.
TEXT: Today, less than 0.3 percent of women who end a pregnancy sustain a serious complication.
CECILE RICHARDS: It's also so important on this 40th anniversary of Roe to recognize and appreciate the doctors and clinicians all across the country who take care of women everyday.
TEXT: 40 YEARS SAFE AND LEGAL, BUT THE FIGHT FOR WOMEN'S HEALTH AND RIGHTS CONTINUES.....
CECILE RICHARDS: Even as we celebrate the 40th anniversary and the importance that it's made in the lives of women in America, politicians are still trying to take women's access to healthcare.
SARAH WEDDINGTON: As we move forward, who our elected officials our in terms of the president, the governors, the members of the house and senate at the congressional level, the state level- that becomes, I think, the most important thing because they are the ones who pass the laws who decides what's going to happen.
CECILE RICHARDS: For a long time the pro-life, pro-choice labels have masked the complexity of this topic and how people authentically feel.
DESTINY ROBINSON: Abortion is not a boxed in issue, it's a very complex issues it has a lot of different parts to it, a lot of decision making goes behind a woman deciding to have an abortion so putting a label on it is not fair.
TEXT: 64 percent of voters younger than 30 said that abortion should be legal in all or most cases.
CECILE RICHARDS: A woman needs to be able to make her own decisions in consultations with her doctor, with her family about her pregnancy and we need to keep politicians out of making the most personal and private decisions that a family can make.
TEXT: ON THE 40TH ANNIVERSARY OF ROE V. WADE WOMEN ACROSS GENERATIONS COMMIT...
DESTINY ROBINSON: to make sure I am a young woman who knows the power of making her own decision.
SARAH WEDDINGTON: to continued vigilance, continued protection, continued investment in those principles that we believe in.
CECILE RICHARDS: to make sure that women of my daughter's generation have the same right that I've had in my life.
TEXT: 40 YEARS SAFE AND LEGAL---LET'S KEEP IT THAT WAY.
END
- published: 18 Jan 2013
- views: 13747
Obama / McCain 3rd Debate, Part 6 - Roe v. Wade
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 5:10
- Updated: 16 Oct 2008
- views: 7271
Barack Obama and John McCain third debate highlights
Barack Obama and John McCain third debate highlights
wn.com/Obama Mccain 3Rd Debate, Part 6 Roe V. Wade
Roe v. Wade Clip from the series "A History of the U.S. Constitution"
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 2:46
- Updated: 21 Apr 2014
- views: 220
Explains the Supreme Court's controversial decision legalizing abortion.
From the series "A History of the U.S. Constitution."
Buy it now:
DVD http://www.ambros...
Explains the Supreme Court's controversial decision legalizing abortion.
From the series "A History of the U.S. Constitution."
Buy it now:
DVD http://www.ambrosevideo.com/displayitem.cfm?vid=1172
Video Stream http://www.ambrosedigital.com/index.php?page=shop.product_details&flypage;=shop.flypage_ambrose&option;=com_virtuemart&Itemid;=59&product;_id=2782
wn.com/Roe V. Wade Clip From The Series A History Of The U.S. Constitution
Explains the Supreme Court's controversial decision legalizing abortion.
From the series "A History of the U.S. Constitution."
Buy it now:
DVD http://www.ambrosevideo.com/displayitem.cfm?vid=1172
Video Stream http://www.ambrosedigital.com/index.php?page=shop.product_details&flypage;=shop.flypage_ambrose&option;=com_virtuemart&Itemid;=59&product;_id=2782
- published: 21 Apr 2014
- views: 220
1973 CBS Evening News with Walter Cronkite (1/22/73)
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 4:09
- Updated: 19 Sep 2012
- views: 21792
Featuring the landmark Roe v. Wade decision
Featuring the landmark Roe v. Wade decision
wn.com/1973 Cbs Evening News With Walter Cronkite (1 22 73)
Constitutional Attorney Destroys Roe v. Wade!
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 15:22
- Updated: 11 Apr 2016
- views: 376
This interview is a pre-recorded segment with Dr. Herb Titus that was aired at the #endabortionnow event in Phoenix, AZ.
In this interview Dr. Titus explains ...
This interview is a pre-recorded segment with Dr. Herb Titus that was aired at the #endabortionnow event in Phoenix, AZ.
In this interview Dr. Titus explains how Roe v Wade can and should be overturned at a state level without the need to wait for new supreme court justices This is a very important conversation that people need to hear. Especially those who are actively involved in the work of pro-life legislation. Please share this with your friends, state legislators, and others who are involved in the pro-life fight.
wn.com/Constitutional Attorney Destroys Roe V. Wade
This interview is a pre-recorded segment with Dr. Herb Titus that was aired at the #endabortionnow event in Phoenix, AZ.
In this interview Dr. Titus explains how Roe v Wade can and should be overturned at a state level without the need to wait for new supreme court justices This is a very important conversation that people need to hear. Especially those who are actively involved in the work of pro-life legislation. Please share this with your friends, state legislators, and others who are involved in the pro-life fight.
- published: 11 Apr 2016
- views: 376
Palin, Biden On Roe V. Wade
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 4:02
- Updated: 01 Oct 2008
- views: 74679
Katie Couric sat down with Sarah Palin and Joe Biden and asked them their thoughts on Roe v. Wade.
- published: 01 Oct 2008
- views: 74679
The Abortion Case That Could Overturn Roe v. Wade
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 7:21
- Updated: 22 Jan 2016
- views: 598
In this excerpt (watch the full interview here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FndPWY_5A3A ) Sunsara Taylor and Dennis Trainor, Jr discuss the challenge to Roe...
In this excerpt (watch the full interview here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FndPWY_5A3A ) Sunsara Taylor and Dennis Trainor, Jr discuss the challenge to Roe v Wade that the Supreme Court will consider in 2016.
From Think Progress:
The Abortion Case That Could Overturn Roe v. Wade Has A Lot Of Opponents by by Alex Zielinski
A looming Supreme Court case that could severely undermine the right to an abortion has attracted an unprecedented amount of opposition from across the country.
A slew of organizations and individuals filed 45 legal briefs in the Supreme Court on Tuesday, each brief examining the case through a unique lens and each coming to the same conclusion: State laws that restrict abortion access are unconstitutional.
The case will examine the validity of a Texas law, known as HB2, that places burdensome, unnecessary guidelines on the state’s dwindling abortion clinics. These regulations, while framed as improvements to safeguard “women’s health,” ultimately have nothing to do with patient safety — and were instead created by anti-abortion legislators to impose additional, costly red tape on clinic staff. So far, it’s been successful. HB2 has already forced half of the state’s clinics to close, thus cutting Texas’ abortion providers in half.
The Supreme Court case, Whole Women’s Health v. Cole, won’t only decide if Texas’ law is constitutional. Depending how the court rules, the decision could also give legal cover to all states seeking to enact laws that appear to function as health regulations, but that actually exist to restrict access to abortion. The oral arguments for the case begin in March. (read more http://thinkprogress.org/health/2016/01/05/3736151/scotus-hb2-briefs/)
STAY CONNECTED:
Subscribe to Acronym TV on YouTube - http://bit.ly/VUl21B
Get on the mailing list http://www.acronymtv.com/join
Facebook http://on.fb.me/1STOwbn
Twitter https://twitter.com/dennistrainorjr
Support Acronym TV with a monthly donation https://www.patreon.com/DennisTrainorJr
Support Acronym TV with a one time donation http://bit.ly/1WBDhqs
website http://www.acronymtv.com/
wn.com/The Abortion Case That Could Overturn Roe V. Wade
In this excerpt (watch the full interview here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FndPWY_5A3A ) Sunsara Taylor and Dennis Trainor, Jr discuss the challenge to Roe v Wade that the Supreme Court will consider in 2016.
From Think Progress:
The Abortion Case That Could Overturn Roe v. Wade Has A Lot Of Opponents by by Alex Zielinski
A looming Supreme Court case that could severely undermine the right to an abortion has attracted an unprecedented amount of opposition from across the country.
A slew of organizations and individuals filed 45 legal briefs in the Supreme Court on Tuesday, each brief examining the case through a unique lens and each coming to the same conclusion: State laws that restrict abortion access are unconstitutional.
The case will examine the validity of a Texas law, known as HB2, that places burdensome, unnecessary guidelines on the state’s dwindling abortion clinics. These regulations, while framed as improvements to safeguard “women’s health,” ultimately have nothing to do with patient safety — and were instead created by anti-abortion legislators to impose additional, costly red tape on clinic staff. So far, it’s been successful. HB2 has already forced half of the state’s clinics to close, thus cutting Texas’ abortion providers in half.
The Supreme Court case, Whole Women’s Health v. Cole, won’t only decide if Texas’ law is constitutional. Depending how the court rules, the decision could also give legal cover to all states seeking to enact laws that appear to function as health regulations, but that actually exist to restrict access to abortion. The oral arguments for the case begin in March. (read more http://thinkprogress.org/health/2016/01/05/3736151/scotus-hb2-briefs/)
STAY CONNECTED:
Subscribe to Acronym TV on YouTube - http://bit.ly/VUl21B
Get on the mailing list http://www.acronymtv.com/join
Facebook http://on.fb.me/1STOwbn
Twitter https://twitter.com/dennistrainorjr
Support Acronym TV with a monthly donation https://www.patreon.com/DennisTrainorJr
Support Acronym TV with a one time donation http://bit.ly/1WBDhqs
website http://www.acronymtv.com/
- published: 22 Jan 2016
- views: 598
Ginsburg: Roe V. Wade Went Too Far
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 8:33
- Updated: 15 May 2013
- views: 986
Thom Hartmann talks about U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg saying she feels The U.S. Supreme Court's decision on abortion was too sweeping and gav...
Thom Hartmann talks about U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg saying she feels The U.S. Supreme Court's decision on abortion was too sweeping and gave opponents a symbol to target.
If you liked this clip of The Thom Hartmann Program, please do us a big favor and share it with your friends... and hit that "like" button!
http://www.thomhartmann.com
Follow Us on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/thom_hartmann
Subscribe to The Thom Hartmann Program for more: http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=thomhartmann
wn.com/Ginsburg Roe V. Wade Went Too Far
Thom Hartmann talks about U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg saying she feels The U.S. Supreme Court's decision on abortion was too sweeping and gave opponents a symbol to target.
If you liked this clip of The Thom Hartmann Program, please do us a big favor and share it with your friends... and hit that "like" button!
http://www.thomhartmann.com
Follow Us on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/thom_hartmann
Subscribe to The Thom Hartmann Program for more: http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=thomhartmann
- published: 15 May 2013
- views: 986
Roe v. Wade | quimbee.com
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 5:46
- Updated: 19 Aug 2015
- views: 268
An animated case brief of Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973). Read the text case brief at https://www.quimbee.com/cases/roe-v-wade
An animated case brief of Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973). Read the text case brief at https://www.quimbee.com/cases/roe-v-wade
wn.com/Roe V. Wade | Quimbee.Com
An animated case brief of Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973). Read the text case brief at https://www.quimbee.com/cases/roe-v-wade
- published: 19 Aug 2015
- views: 268
-
Voices of Choice: Physicians Who Provided Abortions Before Roe v. Wade
Voices of Choice: Physicians Who Provided Abortions Before Roe v. Wade, a 25-minute film created by Physicians for Reproductive Health, documents the experiences of physicians involved in abortion care and reform prior to the landmark Supreme Court Roe v. Wade decision in 1973. Voices of Choice preserves the legacy of older physicians and figures in the reproductive rights movement who witnessed the effects of illegal abortion. Their testimony is essential to document the horror of illegal abortion and the social and historical ramifications of a time when health care providers worked to save the lives of women who suffered needlessly. For more information about this film, including transcripts, visit http://prh.org/provider-voices/voices-of-choice/ For more information about Physicians... -
Roe v Wade Abortion Rights Battle, 2016 | Acronym TV [54]
Episode guide: 00:01 Intro 2:00 "March for Life" or "March for Forced Motherhood and Female Enslavement?" 06:53 Pro-Choice v Pro-Abortion 09:45 Coat Hanger Abortion Attempt Leads to Murder Charge in Tennessee 12:55 Supreme Court Could End Roe v Wade this Year 16:00 Revolutionary Struggle and the Women’s Liberation Movement 20:15 Why The Democratic Party is the Worst Thing To Happen To Women’s Movement 22:14 Abortion Fight is Not About Babies, it is About Controlling Women 25:13 What Does Victory Look Like ***************** Support Acronym TV with a monthly donation https://www.patreon.com/DennisTrainorJr Support Acronym TV with a one time donation http://bit.ly/1WBDhqs website http://www.acronymtv.com/ STAY CONNECTED: Subscribe to Acronym TV on YouTube - http://bit.ly/VUl21B Get on... -
Roe v. Wade Re-Argued: U.S. Supreme Court - Lawyers Present Oral Arguments (1972)
Roe v. Wade reached the Supreme Court on appeal in 1970. The Justices delayed taking action on Roe and a closely related case, Doe v. Bolton, until they decided Younger v. Harris, as they felt that the appeals raised difficult questions on judicial jurisdiction, and United States v. Vuitch, where they considered the constitutionality of a District of Columbia statute that criminalized abortion except where the mother's life or health was endangered. In Vuitch, the Court narrowly upheld the statute, though in doing so, it treated abortion as a medical procedure and stated that the physician must be given room to determine what suffices as a danger to (physical or mental) health. The day after they announced their decision in Vuitch, they voted to hear both Roe and Doe. Arguments were sched... -
Abortion Debate Attorneys Present Roe v Wade Supreme Court Pro Life Pro Choice Arguments 1971
Full Documentary, Documentary,documentary films,documentary history channel,documentary 2014,documentary history,documentary on serial killers, documentary movies,documentary music,documentary bbc,documentary long,documentary america documentary films documentary history channel documentary 2014 documentary bbc documentary national geographic documentary history bbc documentary, bbc documentary history, bbc documentary science, bbc documentary nature, bbc documentary animal,free online,movies free,documentary,streaming movies,channel,hob,bbd,babies,bps,war,new documentary films,film festival, finance,Money,samsung,iphone,robots,forex,stocks,cars,auto,health,insurance,youtube,documentary films,watch documentaries,youtube documentaries, top documentary,buy documentaries,documentary ea... -
Abortion Debate: Attorneys Present Roe v. Wade Supreme Court Pro-Life / Pro-Choice Arguments (1971)
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of abortion. Decided simultaneously with a companion case, Doe v. Bolton, the Court ruled 7--2 that a right to privacy under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman's decision to have an abortion, but that right must be balanced against the state's two legitimate interests in regulating abortions: protecting prenatal life and protecting women's health. Arguing that these state interests became stronger over the course of a pregnancy, the Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of abortion to the trimester of pregnancy. The Court later rejected Roe's trimester framework, while affirming Roe's central holding that a person has a right to abor... -
What Happened to Justices of Roe v Wade When they Met their Maker?
The 15th sermon in the Sermon Series called "True Law Is God's Law" with Pastor David Whitney of Cornerstone Evangelical Free Church. -
Andrew Wommack - Special Roe V. Wade Programs (Ep.1) - Gospel Truth (18.01.2016)
Andrew Wommack - Special Roe V. Wade Programs (Ep.1) - Gospel Truth (18.01.2016) For over four decades, Andrew has traveled America and the world teaching the truth of the Gospel.His profound revelation of the Word of God is taught with clarity and simplicity, emphasizing God's unconditional love and the balance between grace and faith. He reaches millions of people through the daily Gospel Truth radio and television programs, broadcast both domestically and internationally. He founded Charis Bible College Colorado in 1994 to fulfill II Timothy 2:2. Since, he has established CBC extension schools in Atlanta (GA), Chicago (IL), Dallas (TX), Jacksonville (FL), Kansas City (KS), Dyer (IN), Plymouth (MA), and Gardner (MA). Internationally, there are schools in Belize City, Belize; Western Cape... -
Andrew Wommack - Special Roe V. Wade Programs (Ep.2) - Gospel Truth (19.01.2016)
Andrew Wommack - Special Roe V. Wade Programs (Ep.2) - Gospel Truth (19.01.2016) For over four decades, Andrew has traveled America and the world teaching the truth of the Gospel.His profound revelation of the Word of God is taught with clarity and simplicity, emphasizing God's unconditional love and the balance between grace and faith. He reaches millions of people through the daily Gospel Truth radio and television programs, broadcast both domestically and internationally. He founded Charis Bible College Colorado in 1994 to fulfill II Timothy 2:2. Since, he has established CBC extension schools in Atlanta (GA), Chicago (IL), Dallas (TX), Jacksonville (FL), Kansas City (KS), Dyer (IN), Plymouth (MA), and Gardner (MA). Internationally, there are schools in Belize City, Belize; Western Cape... -
Abuse of Discretion: The Inside Story of Roe v. Wade
Based on 20 years of research, including an examination of the papers of eight of the nine Justices who voted in Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton, Abuse of Discretion is a critical review of the behind-the-scenes deliberations that went into the Supreme Court's abortion decisions and how the mistakes made by the Justices in 1971-1973 have led to the turmoil we see today in legislation, politics, and public health. Why do the abortion decisions remain so controversial after almost 40 years, despite more than 50,000,000 abortions, numerous presidential elections, and a complete turnover in the Justices? Why did such a sweeping decision -- with such important consequences for public health, producing such prolonged political turmoil -- come from the Supreme Court in 1973? -
40 Years Later: Roe v. Wade, Natural Law, and the Jurisprudence of Abortion
Join the Federalist Society and renowned Natural Law Theorist Professor Hadley Arkes on the 40th Anniversary of Roe v. Wade. What is the current state of abortion jurisprudence? Where is it headed? Are we on the right path? Obviously opinions will differ, so join us for a great discussion! -
Donald Trump Says He May Not Overturn Roe vs. Wade
1. Donald Trump Says He May Not Overturn Roe vs. Wade 2. Ben Carson Believes Pro-lifers May Be Responsible For a Recent Shooting 3. Ted Cruz Is Being Misquoted About Whether The Shooter Was Transgendered (c) 2015, Chaplain Gordon James Klingenschmitt, PhD. Airs 12/15 on NRB Network, TheWalkTV, Roku, GoogleTV, ITunes, IPointTV, Glorystar Satellite -
Peter Charles Hoffer: Roe v. Wade - September 19, 2013
University of Georgia professor Peter Charles Hoffer examines the repercussions of the controversial 1973 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision that upheld a woman's right to have an abortion and became a flashpoint in the contemporary "culture" war, as part of the Library's Legal Landmarks series on Supreme Court decisions. http://kclibrary.org -
GPS SSUSH 25b Roe v Wade, Bakke Case [Video 126]
Tutorial on Unit 9 Standard 25 Substandard b Roe v. Wade and Regents of the University of California in preparation for the Georgia End of Course Test (EOCT) in U.S. History. -
[467] Fearbola, Reigniting Roe v. Wade, #Newsfail & Torturing Folks Again?
Abby Martin Breaks the Set on Fearbola, Torture Redux?, Texas’ War on Women & #NewsFail. LIKE Breaking the Set @ http://fb.me/JournalistAbbyMartin FOLLOW Abby Martin @ http://twitter.com/AbbyMartin EPISODE BREAKDOWN: On this episode of Breaking the Set, Abby Martin discusses the worst cases of ebola hysteria, citing schools in New Jersey and Maine that have kept teachers and students from attending class for merely travelling to places like Rwanda and Dallas. Abby then discusses the effort by the Obama Administration to suppress the release of never-before-seen photos from the Abu Ghraib prison scandal of 2004 as well as the fact that top National Security Council lawyers are considering whether to regress back to the Bush Administration’s view on torture at overseas sites. Abby then... -
Face of Pro-Life #182: Roe v. Wade and Wall St.
Ave Maria! Friar Roderic and Corinn Dahm discuss a rather strange article found on Bloomberg's website titled How Roe v. Wade Empowered U.S. Investors. So if a financial news site can focus on the landmark pro-abortion decision then we at the Face of Prolife can discuss finance, and so we did. Find out how the most radical liberal pro-abortion ruling has resulted in fiscal conservative presidents and congresses which have Wall Street cheering and Pro-lifers booing and how liberals democrats may actually have more incentive to fight Roe v. Wade than conservative, pro-life republicans. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-14/how-roe-v-wade-empowered-u-s-investors.html Ave Maria! To Download Audio go to http://airmaria.com?p=28418 -
Roe at 40: What We Have Learned | Roe v. Wade in History
On March 7, 2013, the Stanford Constitutional Law Center hosted the 2-day conference "Roe at 40: What We Have Learned." The academic conference reflected on Roe's legacy in jurisprudence and politics, the ethical and legal status of the unborn, and future reproductive rights issues. The panel "Roe v. Wade in History" was moderated by Stanford Law School Professor Amalia Kessler and featured University of Pittsburgh School of Law's David Garrow, Americans United for Life's Clarke Forsythe and Judge A. Raymond Randolph, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. -
2016 S Roe v Wade Panel Discussion Jan 23
Description -
The Tragic History of Roe v. Wade
Defending life in 2013. The Tragic History of Roe v. Wade. Tuesday, January 15th at the University of St. Thomas. Featuring Clarke Forsyth, Americans United for Life, Senior Counsel. Sponsored by, The Prolife Center at UST. -
Roe v. Wade - 40 Years #510
"On the Box with Ray Comfort" is a daily (Monday through Friday) live, 27-minute, web-based talk show hosted by Ray Comfort and the Living Waters team. http://www.ustream.tv/channel/on-the-box Episode #510
Voices of Choice: Physicians Who Provided Abortions Before Roe v. Wade
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 25:21
- Updated: 22 Jan 2013
- views: 4345
Voices of Choice: Physicians Who Provided Abortions Before Roe v. Wade, a 25-minute film created by Physicians for Reproductive Health, documents the experience...
Voices of Choice: Physicians Who Provided Abortions Before Roe v. Wade, a 25-minute film created by Physicians for Reproductive Health, documents the experiences of physicians involved in abortion care and reform prior to the landmark Supreme Court Roe v. Wade decision in 1973.
Voices of Choice preserves the legacy of older physicians and figures in the reproductive rights movement who witnessed the effects of illegal abortion. Their testimony is essential to document the horror of illegal abortion and the social and historical ramifications of a time when health care providers worked to save the lives of women who suffered needlessly.
For more information about this film, including transcripts, visit http://prh.org/provider-voices/voices-of-choice/
For more information about Physicians for Reproductive Health, visit http://www.prh.org/
wn.com/Voices Of Choice Physicians Who Provided Abortions Before Roe V. Wade
Voices of Choice: Physicians Who Provided Abortions Before Roe v. Wade, a 25-minute film created by Physicians for Reproductive Health, documents the experiences of physicians involved in abortion care and reform prior to the landmark Supreme Court Roe v. Wade decision in 1973.
Voices of Choice preserves the legacy of older physicians and figures in the reproductive rights movement who witnessed the effects of illegal abortion. Their testimony is essential to document the horror of illegal abortion and the social and historical ramifications of a time when health care providers worked to save the lives of women who suffered needlessly.
For more information about this film, including transcripts, visit http://prh.org/provider-voices/voices-of-choice/
For more information about Physicians for Reproductive Health, visit http://www.prh.org/
- published: 22 Jan 2013
- views: 4345
Roe v Wade Abortion Rights Battle, 2016 | Acronym TV [54]
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 28:00
- Updated: 20 Jan 2016
- views: 416
Episode guide: 00:01 Intro
2:00 "March for Life" or "March for Forced Motherhood and Female Enslavement?"
06:53 Pro-Choice v Pro-Abortion
09:45 Coat Hanger Ab...
Episode guide: 00:01 Intro
2:00 "March for Life" or "March for Forced Motherhood and Female Enslavement?"
06:53 Pro-Choice v Pro-Abortion
09:45 Coat Hanger Abortion Attempt Leads to Murder Charge in Tennessee
12:55 Supreme Court Could End Roe v Wade this Year
16:00 Revolutionary Struggle and the Women’s Liberation Movement
20:15 Why The Democratic Party is the Worst Thing To Happen To Women’s Movement
22:14 Abortion Fight is Not About Babies, it is About Controlling Women
25:13 What Does Victory Look Like
*****************
Support Acronym TV with a monthly donation https://www.patreon.com/DennisTrainorJr
Support Acronym TV with a one time donation http://bit.ly/1WBDhqs
website http://www.acronymtv.com/
STAY CONNECTED:
Subscribe to Acronym TV on YouTube - http://bit.ly/VUl21B
Get on the mailing list http://www.acronymtv.com/join
Facebook http://on.fb.me/1STOwbn
Twitter https://twitter.com/dennistrainorjr
***********
An interview with Sunsara Taylor
As we near the 43rd anniversary of Roe v Wade, the Supreme Court is getting ready to hear a case that could radically restrict the number of women’s health care facilities in the United States and may make abortion services inaccessible in many parts of the country.
Before the Supreme Court will hear that case, radical religious extremists from all over the country will come to Washington, D.C. for the annual ‘March for Life’.
Sunsara Taylor, the initiator behind the group Stop Patriarchy calls the march a “march for forced motherhood.” Taylor is leading the counter protests in Washington DC, and sat down with Dennis Trainor, Jr or this extended conversation just before the “March for Life.”
For more information on the counter protests being organized by Stop Patriarchy, visit: http://www.stoppatriarchy.org/roe-v-wade-2016.html
TAGS
Roe v wade, Supreme Court, March for life, HB2, Supreme Court Abortion, Pro-life generation, Abortion on demand, Operation Rescue, Sunsara Taylor, Stop Patriarchy, Pro Choice, Abortion, Pro Abortion, Pro life, right to life, Women’s liberation, Acronym TV, Dennis Trainor Jr.
wn.com/Roe V Wade Abortion Rights Battle, 2016 | Acronym Tv 54
Episode guide: 00:01 Intro
2:00 "March for Life" or "March for Forced Motherhood and Female Enslavement?"
06:53 Pro-Choice v Pro-Abortion
09:45 Coat Hanger Abortion Attempt Leads to Murder Charge in Tennessee
12:55 Supreme Court Could End Roe v Wade this Year
16:00 Revolutionary Struggle and the Women’s Liberation Movement
20:15 Why The Democratic Party is the Worst Thing To Happen To Women’s Movement
22:14 Abortion Fight is Not About Babies, it is About Controlling Women
25:13 What Does Victory Look Like
*****************
Support Acronym TV with a monthly donation https://www.patreon.com/DennisTrainorJr
Support Acronym TV with a one time donation http://bit.ly/1WBDhqs
website http://www.acronymtv.com/
STAY CONNECTED:
Subscribe to Acronym TV on YouTube - http://bit.ly/VUl21B
Get on the mailing list http://www.acronymtv.com/join
Facebook http://on.fb.me/1STOwbn
Twitter https://twitter.com/dennistrainorjr
***********
An interview with Sunsara Taylor
As we near the 43rd anniversary of Roe v Wade, the Supreme Court is getting ready to hear a case that could radically restrict the number of women’s health care facilities in the United States and may make abortion services inaccessible in many parts of the country.
Before the Supreme Court will hear that case, radical religious extremists from all over the country will come to Washington, D.C. for the annual ‘March for Life’.
Sunsara Taylor, the initiator behind the group Stop Patriarchy calls the march a “march for forced motherhood.” Taylor is leading the counter protests in Washington DC, and sat down with Dennis Trainor, Jr or this extended conversation just before the “March for Life.”
For more information on the counter protests being organized by Stop Patriarchy, visit: http://www.stoppatriarchy.org/roe-v-wade-2016.html
TAGS
Roe v wade, Supreme Court, March for life, HB2, Supreme Court Abortion, Pro-life generation, Abortion on demand, Operation Rescue, Sunsara Taylor, Stop Patriarchy, Pro Choice, Abortion, Pro Abortion, Pro life, right to life, Women’s liberation, Acronym TV, Dennis Trainor Jr.
- published: 20 Jan 2016
- views: 416
Roe v. Wade Re-Argued: U.S. Supreme Court - Lawyers Present Oral Arguments (1972)
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 63:41
- Updated: 07 Aug 2013
- views: 2334
Roe v. Wade reached the Supreme Court on appeal in 1970. The Justices delayed taking action on Roe and a closely related case, Doe v. Bolton, until they decided...
Roe v. Wade reached the Supreme Court on appeal in 1970. The Justices delayed taking action on Roe and a closely related case, Doe v. Bolton, until they decided Younger v. Harris, as they felt that the appeals raised difficult questions on judicial jurisdiction, and United States v. Vuitch, where they considered the constitutionality of a District of Columbia statute that criminalized abortion except where the mother's life or health was endangered. In Vuitch, the Court narrowly upheld the statute, though in doing so, it treated abortion as a medical procedure and stated that the physician must be given room to determine what suffices as a danger to (physical or mental) health. The day after they announced their decision in Vuitch, they voted to hear both Roe and Doe.
Arguments were scheduled by the full Court for December 13, 1971. Before the Court could hear the oral arguments, Justices Black and Harlan retired. Chief Justice Burger asked Justices Stewart and Blackmun to determine whether Roe and Doe, among others, should be heard as scheduled. According to Blackmun, Stewart felt that the cases were a straightforward application of Younger v. Harris and recommended that the Court move forward as scheduled.[15]
Following a first round of arguments, all seven Justices tentatively agreed that the law should be struck down, but for varying reasons.[16] Burger assigned the role of writing the Court's opinion in Roe (as well as Doe) to Blackmun, who began drafting a preliminary opinion that emphasized what he saw as the Texas law's vagueness.[17] Justices Rehnquist and Powell joined the Supreme Court too late to hear the first round of arguments. Additionally, Blackmun felt that his opinion was an inadequate reflection of his liberal colleagues' opinions.[18] In May 1972, Blackmun proposed that the case be reargued. Justice Douglas threatened to write a dissent from the reargument order (he and the other liberal Justices were suspicious that Rehnquist and Powell would vote to uphold the statute), but was coaxed out of the action by his colleagues, and his dissent was merely mentioned in the reargument order without further statement or opinion.[19][20] The case was reargued on October 11, 1972. Weddington continued to represent Roe, and Texas Assistant Attorney General Robert C. Flowers stepped in to replace Jay Floyd for Texas.
Blackmun continued work on his opinions in both cases over the summer recess, despite the fact that there was no guarantee that he would be assigned to write the opinions again. Over the recess, Blackmun spent a week researching the history of abortion at the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, where he had worked in the 1950s. After the Court heard the second round of arguments, Powell stated that he would agree with Blackmun's conclusion but pushed for Roe to be the lead of the two abortion cases being considered. Powell also suggested that the Court strike down the Texas law on privacy grounds. White was unwilling to sign on to Blackmun's opinion, and Rehnquist had already decided to dissent.[21]
The Court issued its decision on January 22, 1973, with a 7-to-2 majority vote in favor of Roe. Burger and Douglas' concurring opinions and White's dissenting opinion were issued along with the Court's opinion in Doe v. Bolton (announced on the same day as Roe v. Wade). The Court deemed abortion a fundamental right under the United States Constitution, thereby subjecting all laws attempting to restrict it to the standard of strict scrutiny.
The Court declined to adopt the district court's Ninth Amendment rationale, and instead asserted that the "right of privacy, whether it be founded in the Fourteenth Amendment's concept of personal liberty and restrictions upon state action, as we feel it is, or, as the district court determined, in the Ninth Amendment's reservation of rights to the people, is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy."[23] Douglas, in his concurring opinion in the companion case Doe v. Bolton, stated more emphatically that, "The Ninth Amendment obviously does not create federally enforceable rights."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v_wade
wn.com/Roe V. Wade Re Argued U.S. Supreme Court Lawyers Present Oral Arguments (1972)
Roe v. Wade reached the Supreme Court on appeal in 1970. The Justices delayed taking action on Roe and a closely related case, Doe v. Bolton, until they decided Younger v. Harris, as they felt that the appeals raised difficult questions on judicial jurisdiction, and United States v. Vuitch, where they considered the constitutionality of a District of Columbia statute that criminalized abortion except where the mother's life or health was endangered. In Vuitch, the Court narrowly upheld the statute, though in doing so, it treated abortion as a medical procedure and stated that the physician must be given room to determine what suffices as a danger to (physical or mental) health. The day after they announced their decision in Vuitch, they voted to hear both Roe and Doe.
Arguments were scheduled by the full Court for December 13, 1971. Before the Court could hear the oral arguments, Justices Black and Harlan retired. Chief Justice Burger asked Justices Stewart and Blackmun to determine whether Roe and Doe, among others, should be heard as scheduled. According to Blackmun, Stewart felt that the cases were a straightforward application of Younger v. Harris and recommended that the Court move forward as scheduled.[15]
Following a first round of arguments, all seven Justices tentatively agreed that the law should be struck down, but for varying reasons.[16] Burger assigned the role of writing the Court's opinion in Roe (as well as Doe) to Blackmun, who began drafting a preliminary opinion that emphasized what he saw as the Texas law's vagueness.[17] Justices Rehnquist and Powell joined the Supreme Court too late to hear the first round of arguments. Additionally, Blackmun felt that his opinion was an inadequate reflection of his liberal colleagues' opinions.[18] In May 1972, Blackmun proposed that the case be reargued. Justice Douglas threatened to write a dissent from the reargument order (he and the other liberal Justices were suspicious that Rehnquist and Powell would vote to uphold the statute), but was coaxed out of the action by his colleagues, and his dissent was merely mentioned in the reargument order without further statement or opinion.[19][20] The case was reargued on October 11, 1972. Weddington continued to represent Roe, and Texas Assistant Attorney General Robert C. Flowers stepped in to replace Jay Floyd for Texas.
Blackmun continued work on his opinions in both cases over the summer recess, despite the fact that there was no guarantee that he would be assigned to write the opinions again. Over the recess, Blackmun spent a week researching the history of abortion at the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, where he had worked in the 1950s. After the Court heard the second round of arguments, Powell stated that he would agree with Blackmun's conclusion but pushed for Roe to be the lead of the two abortion cases being considered. Powell also suggested that the Court strike down the Texas law on privacy grounds. White was unwilling to sign on to Blackmun's opinion, and Rehnquist had already decided to dissent.[21]
The Court issued its decision on January 22, 1973, with a 7-to-2 majority vote in favor of Roe. Burger and Douglas' concurring opinions and White's dissenting opinion were issued along with the Court's opinion in Doe v. Bolton (announced on the same day as Roe v. Wade). The Court deemed abortion a fundamental right under the United States Constitution, thereby subjecting all laws attempting to restrict it to the standard of strict scrutiny.
The Court declined to adopt the district court's Ninth Amendment rationale, and instead asserted that the "right of privacy, whether it be founded in the Fourteenth Amendment's concept of personal liberty and restrictions upon state action, as we feel it is, or, as the district court determined, in the Ninth Amendment's reservation of rights to the people, is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy."[23] Douglas, in his concurring opinion in the companion case Doe v. Bolton, stated more emphatically that, "The Ninth Amendment obviously does not create federally enforceable rights."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v_wade
- published: 07 Aug 2013
- views: 2334
Abortion Debate Attorneys Present Roe v Wade Supreme Court Pro Life Pro Choice Arguments 1971
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 63:26
- Updated: 07 Jul 2015
- views: 111
Full Documentary,
Documentary,documentary films,documentary history channel,documentary 2014,documentary history,documentary on serial killers,
documentary m...
Full Documentary,
Documentary,documentary films,documentary history channel,documentary 2014,documentary history,documentary on serial killers,
documentary movies,documentary music,documentary bbc,documentary long,documentary america
documentary films
documentary history channel
documentary 2014
documentary bbc
documentary national geographic
documentary history
bbc documentary,
bbc documentary history,
bbc documentary science,
bbc documentary nature,
bbc documentary animal,free online,movies free,documentary,streaming movies,channel,hob,bbd,babies,bps,war,new documentary films,film festival,
finance,Money,samsung,iphone,robots,forex,stocks,cars,auto,health,insurance,youtube,documentary films,watch documentaries,youtube documentaries,
top documentary,buy documentaries,documentary eating,education documentary,dvd documentaries,documentary life,documentaries for free
Top Documentary Films
wn.com/Abortion Debate Attorneys Present Roe V Wade Supreme Court Pro Life Pro Choice Arguments 1971
Full Documentary,
Documentary,documentary films,documentary history channel,documentary 2014,documentary history,documentary on serial killers,
documentary movies,documentary music,documentary bbc,documentary long,documentary america
documentary films
documentary history channel
documentary 2014
documentary bbc
documentary national geographic
documentary history
bbc documentary,
bbc documentary history,
bbc documentary science,
bbc documentary nature,
bbc documentary animal,free online,movies free,documentary,streaming movies,channel,hob,bbd,babies,bps,war,new documentary films,film festival,
finance,Money,samsung,iphone,robots,forex,stocks,cars,auto,health,insurance,youtube,documentary films,watch documentaries,youtube documentaries,
top documentary,buy documentaries,documentary eating,education documentary,dvd documentaries,documentary life,documentaries for free
Top Documentary Films
- published: 07 Jul 2015
- views: 111
Abortion Debate: Attorneys Present Roe v. Wade Supreme Court Pro-Life / Pro-Choice Arguments (1971)
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 64:43
- Updated: 01 Jan 2013
- views: 18001
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of abortion. Decided simultaneously with a companion ca...
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of abortion. Decided simultaneously with a companion case, Doe v. Bolton, the Court ruled 7--2 that a right to privacy under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman's decision to have an abortion, but that right must be balanced against the state's two legitimate interests in regulating abortions: protecting prenatal life and protecting women's health. Arguing that these state interests became stronger over the course of a pregnancy, the Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of abortion to the trimester of pregnancy.
The Court later rejected Roe's trimester framework, while affirming Roe's central holding that a person has a right to abortion until viability. The Roe decision defined "viable" as being "potentially able to live outside the mother's womb, albeit with artificial aid", adding that viability "is usually placed at about seven months (28 weeks) but may occur earlier, even at 24 weeks."
In disallowing many state and federal restrictions on abortion in the United States, Roe v. Wade prompted a national debate that continues today, about issues including whether and to what extent abortion should be legal, who should decide the legality of abortion, what methods the Supreme Court should use in constitutional adjudication, and what the role should be of religious and moral views in the political sphere. Roe v. Wade reshaped national politics, dividing much of the United States into pro-choice and pro-life camps, while activating grassroots movements on both sides.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade
Sarah Ragle Weddington (born February 5, 1945, in Abilene, Texas) is an American attorney, law professor, and former Texas state legislator best known for representing "Jane Roe" (real name Norma McCorvey) in the landmark Roe v. Wade case before the United States Supreme Court.
After graduating, Weddington found it difficult to find a job with a law firm. She instead joined a group of graduate students at University of Texas-Austin that was researching ways to challenge various anti-abortion statutes. After deciding that a woman should helm a lawsuit to challenge Texas' statute, Weddington volunteered.
Soon after, a pregnant woman named Norma McCorvey visited a local attorney seeking an abortion. The attorney instead assisted McCorvey with handing over her child for adoption, and after doing so, referred McCorvey to Weddington and Linda Coffee. In March 1970, Weddington and her co-counsel filed suit against Wade, the Dallas district attorney and the person responsible for enforcing the anti-abortion statute. McCorvey became the landmark plaintiff, and was referred in the legal documents as "Jane Roe" to protect her identity.
Weddington first stated her case in front of a three-judge district court on May 1970 in Dallas. The district court agreed that the Texas abortion laws were unlawful, but the state appealed the decision, landing it before the United States Supreme Court.
Weddington appeared before the Supreme Court in 1971 and again in the fall of 1972. Her argument was based on the 1st, 4th, 5th, 8th, 9th and 14th amendments, as well as the Court's previous decision in Griswold v. Connecticut, which legalized the sale of contraceptives based on the right of privacy. Of the experience, Weddington later stated, "There was a sense of majesty, walking up those stairs, my steps echoing on the marble. I went to the lawyers' lounge — to go over my argument. I wanted to make a last stop before I went in — but there was no ladies' room in the lawyer's lounge."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Weddington
wn.com/Abortion Debate Attorneys Present Roe V. Wade Supreme Court Pro Life Pro Choice Arguments (1971)
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of abortion. Decided simultaneously with a companion case, Doe v. Bolton, the Court ruled 7--2 that a right to privacy under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman's decision to have an abortion, but that right must be balanced against the state's two legitimate interests in regulating abortions: protecting prenatal life and protecting women's health. Arguing that these state interests became stronger over the course of a pregnancy, the Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of abortion to the trimester of pregnancy.
The Court later rejected Roe's trimester framework, while affirming Roe's central holding that a person has a right to abortion until viability. The Roe decision defined "viable" as being "potentially able to live outside the mother's womb, albeit with artificial aid", adding that viability "is usually placed at about seven months (28 weeks) but may occur earlier, even at 24 weeks."
In disallowing many state and federal restrictions on abortion in the United States, Roe v. Wade prompted a national debate that continues today, about issues including whether and to what extent abortion should be legal, who should decide the legality of abortion, what methods the Supreme Court should use in constitutional adjudication, and what the role should be of religious and moral views in the political sphere. Roe v. Wade reshaped national politics, dividing much of the United States into pro-choice and pro-life camps, while activating grassroots movements on both sides.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade
Sarah Ragle Weddington (born February 5, 1945, in Abilene, Texas) is an American attorney, law professor, and former Texas state legislator best known for representing "Jane Roe" (real name Norma McCorvey) in the landmark Roe v. Wade case before the United States Supreme Court.
After graduating, Weddington found it difficult to find a job with a law firm. She instead joined a group of graduate students at University of Texas-Austin that was researching ways to challenge various anti-abortion statutes. After deciding that a woman should helm a lawsuit to challenge Texas' statute, Weddington volunteered.
Soon after, a pregnant woman named Norma McCorvey visited a local attorney seeking an abortion. The attorney instead assisted McCorvey with handing over her child for adoption, and after doing so, referred McCorvey to Weddington and Linda Coffee. In March 1970, Weddington and her co-counsel filed suit against Wade, the Dallas district attorney and the person responsible for enforcing the anti-abortion statute. McCorvey became the landmark plaintiff, and was referred in the legal documents as "Jane Roe" to protect her identity.
Weddington first stated her case in front of a three-judge district court on May 1970 in Dallas. The district court agreed that the Texas abortion laws were unlawful, but the state appealed the decision, landing it before the United States Supreme Court.
Weddington appeared before the Supreme Court in 1971 and again in the fall of 1972. Her argument was based on the 1st, 4th, 5th, 8th, 9th and 14th amendments, as well as the Court's previous decision in Griswold v. Connecticut, which legalized the sale of contraceptives based on the right of privacy. Of the experience, Weddington later stated, "There was a sense of majesty, walking up those stairs, my steps echoing on the marble. I went to the lawyers' lounge — to go over my argument. I wanted to make a last stop before I went in — but there was no ladies' room in the lawyer's lounge."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Weddington
- published: 01 Jan 2013
- views: 18001
What Happened to Justices of Roe v Wade When they Met their Maker?
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 43:33
- Updated: 18 Jan 2016
- views: 601
The 15th sermon in the Sermon Series called "True Law Is God's Law" with Pastor David Whitney of Cornerstone Evangelical Free Church.
The 15th sermon in the Sermon Series called "True Law Is God's Law" with Pastor David Whitney of Cornerstone Evangelical Free Church.
wn.com/What Happened To Justices Of Roe V Wade When They Met Their Maker
The 15th sermon in the Sermon Series called "True Law Is God's Law" with Pastor David Whitney of Cornerstone Evangelical Free Church.
- published: 18 Jan 2016
- views: 601
Andrew Wommack - Special Roe V. Wade Programs (Ep.1) - Gospel Truth (18.01.2016)
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 28:31
- Updated: 18 Jan 2016
- views: 202
Andrew Wommack - Special Roe V. Wade Programs (Ep.1) - Gospel Truth (18.01.2016)
For over four decades, Andrew has traveled America and the world teaching the t...
Andrew Wommack - Special Roe V. Wade Programs (Ep.1) - Gospel Truth (18.01.2016)
For over four decades, Andrew has traveled America and the world teaching the truth of the Gospel.His profound revelation of the Word of God is taught with clarity and simplicity, emphasizing God's unconditional love and the balance between grace and faith. He reaches millions of people through the daily Gospel Truth radio and television programs, broadcast both domestically and internationally. He founded Charis Bible College Colorado in 1994 to fulfill II Timothy 2:2. Since, he has established CBC extension schools in Atlanta (GA), Chicago (IL), Dallas (TX), Jacksonville (FL), Kansas City (KS), Dyer (IN), Plymouth (MA), and Gardner (MA). Internationally, there are schools in Belize City, Belize; Western Cape, South Africa; Walsall, England; Belfast, Ireland; St. Petersburg, Russia; Chennai, India; the Netherlands, and Kampala, Uganda with others soon to open. Andrew has produced a library of teaching materials, available in print, audio, and visual formats. Most of his teaching can be downloaded free from his website: www.awmi.net. And, as it has been from the beginning, his ministry continues to distribute free CDs of his teaching to those who cannot afford them.
Source: Andrew Wommack Ministries - http://www.awmi.net
wn.com/Andrew Wommack Special Roe V. Wade Programs (Ep.1) Gospel Truth (18.01.2016)
Andrew Wommack - Special Roe V. Wade Programs (Ep.1) - Gospel Truth (18.01.2016)
For over four decades, Andrew has traveled America and the world teaching the truth of the Gospel.His profound revelation of the Word of God is taught with clarity and simplicity, emphasizing God's unconditional love and the balance between grace and faith. He reaches millions of people through the daily Gospel Truth radio and television programs, broadcast both domestically and internationally. He founded Charis Bible College Colorado in 1994 to fulfill II Timothy 2:2. Since, he has established CBC extension schools in Atlanta (GA), Chicago (IL), Dallas (TX), Jacksonville (FL), Kansas City (KS), Dyer (IN), Plymouth (MA), and Gardner (MA). Internationally, there are schools in Belize City, Belize; Western Cape, South Africa; Walsall, England; Belfast, Ireland; St. Petersburg, Russia; Chennai, India; the Netherlands, and Kampala, Uganda with others soon to open. Andrew has produced a library of teaching materials, available in print, audio, and visual formats. Most of his teaching can be downloaded free from his website: www.awmi.net. And, as it has been from the beginning, his ministry continues to distribute free CDs of his teaching to those who cannot afford them.
Source: Andrew Wommack Ministries - http://www.awmi.net
- published: 18 Jan 2016
- views: 202
Andrew Wommack - Special Roe V. Wade Programs (Ep.2) - Gospel Truth (19.01.2016)
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 28:31
- Updated: 19 Jan 2016
- views: 129
Andrew Wommack - Special Roe V. Wade Programs (Ep.2) - Gospel Truth (19.01.2016)
For over four decades, Andrew has traveled America and the world teaching the t...
Andrew Wommack - Special Roe V. Wade Programs (Ep.2) - Gospel Truth (19.01.2016)
For over four decades, Andrew has traveled America and the world teaching the truth of the Gospel.His profound revelation of the Word of God is taught with clarity and simplicity, emphasizing God's unconditional love and the balance between grace and faith. He reaches millions of people through the daily Gospel Truth radio and television programs, broadcast both domestically and internationally. He founded Charis Bible College Colorado in 1994 to fulfill II Timothy 2:2. Since, he has established CBC extension schools in Atlanta (GA), Chicago (IL), Dallas (TX), Jacksonville (FL), Kansas City (KS), Dyer (IN), Plymouth (MA), and Gardner (MA). Internationally, there are schools in Belize City, Belize; Western Cape, South Africa; Walsall, England; Belfast, Ireland; St. Petersburg, Russia; Chennai, India; the Netherlands, and Kampala, Uganda with others soon to open. Andrew has produced a library of teaching materials, available in print, audio, and visual formats. Most of his teaching can be downloaded free from his website: www.awmi.net. And, as it has been from the beginning, his ministry continues to distribute free CDs of his teaching to those who cannot afford them.
Source: Andrew Wommack Ministries - http://www.awmi.net
wn.com/Andrew Wommack Special Roe V. Wade Programs (Ep.2) Gospel Truth (19.01.2016)
Andrew Wommack - Special Roe V. Wade Programs (Ep.2) - Gospel Truth (19.01.2016)
For over four decades, Andrew has traveled America and the world teaching the truth of the Gospel.His profound revelation of the Word of God is taught with clarity and simplicity, emphasizing God's unconditional love and the balance between grace and faith. He reaches millions of people through the daily Gospel Truth radio and television programs, broadcast both domestically and internationally. He founded Charis Bible College Colorado in 1994 to fulfill II Timothy 2:2. Since, he has established CBC extension schools in Atlanta (GA), Chicago (IL), Dallas (TX), Jacksonville (FL), Kansas City (KS), Dyer (IN), Plymouth (MA), and Gardner (MA). Internationally, there are schools in Belize City, Belize; Western Cape, South Africa; Walsall, England; Belfast, Ireland; St. Petersburg, Russia; Chennai, India; the Netherlands, and Kampala, Uganda with others soon to open. Andrew has produced a library of teaching materials, available in print, audio, and visual formats. Most of his teaching can be downloaded free from his website: www.awmi.net. And, as it has been from the beginning, his ministry continues to distribute free CDs of his teaching to those who cannot afford them.
Source: Andrew Wommack Ministries - http://www.awmi.net
- published: 19 Jan 2016
- views: 129
Abuse of Discretion: The Inside Story of Roe v. Wade
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 57:55
- Updated: 23 Jan 2014
- views: 1769
Based on 20 years of research, including an examination of the papers of eight of the nine Justices who voted in Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton, Abuse of Discret...
Based on 20 years of research, including an examination of the papers of eight of the nine Justices who voted in Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton, Abuse of Discretion is a critical review of the behind-the-scenes deliberations that went into the Supreme Court's abortion decisions and how the mistakes made by the Justices in 1971-1973 have led to the turmoil we see today in legislation, politics, and public health.
Why do the abortion decisions remain so controversial after almost 40 years, despite more than 50,000,000 abortions, numerous presidential elections, and a complete turnover in the Justices? Why did such a sweeping decision -- with such important consequences for public health, producing such prolonged political turmoil -- come from the Supreme Court in 1973?
wn.com/Abuse Of Discretion The Inside Story Of Roe V. Wade
Based on 20 years of research, including an examination of the papers of eight of the nine Justices who voted in Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton, Abuse of Discretion is a critical review of the behind-the-scenes deliberations that went into the Supreme Court's abortion decisions and how the mistakes made by the Justices in 1971-1973 have led to the turmoil we see today in legislation, politics, and public health.
Why do the abortion decisions remain so controversial after almost 40 years, despite more than 50,000,000 abortions, numerous presidential elections, and a complete turnover in the Justices? Why did such a sweeping decision -- with such important consequences for public health, producing such prolonged political turmoil -- come from the Supreme Court in 1973?
- published: 23 Jan 2014
- views: 1769
40 Years Later: Roe v. Wade, Natural Law, and the Jurisprudence of Abortion
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 61:06
- Updated: 23 Jan 2013
- views: 1663
Join the Federalist Society and renowned Natural Law Theorist Professor Hadley Arkes on the 40th Anniversary of Roe v. Wade. What is the current state of aborti...
Join the Federalist Society and renowned Natural Law Theorist Professor Hadley Arkes on the 40th Anniversary of Roe v. Wade. What is the current state of abortion jurisprudence? Where is it headed? Are we on the right path? Obviously opinions will differ, so join us for a great discussion!
wn.com/40 Years Later Roe V. Wade, Natural Law, And The Jurisprudence Of Abortion
Join the Federalist Society and renowned Natural Law Theorist Professor Hadley Arkes on the 40th Anniversary of Roe v. Wade. What is the current state of abortion jurisprudence? Where is it headed? Are we on the right path? Obviously opinions will differ, so join us for a great discussion!
- published: 23 Jan 2013
- views: 1663
Donald Trump Says He May Not Overturn Roe vs. Wade
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 28:32
- Updated: 09 Dec 2015
- views: 222
1. Donald Trump Says He May Not Overturn Roe vs. Wade
2. Ben Carson Believes Pro-lifers May Be Responsible For a Recent Shooting
3. Ted Cruz Is Being Misquot...
1. Donald Trump Says He May Not Overturn Roe vs. Wade
2. Ben Carson Believes Pro-lifers May Be Responsible For a Recent Shooting
3. Ted Cruz Is Being Misquoted About Whether The Shooter Was Transgendered
(c) 2015, Chaplain Gordon James Klingenschmitt, PhD. Airs 12/15 on NRB Network, TheWalkTV, Roku, GoogleTV, ITunes, IPointTV, Glorystar Satellite
wn.com/Donald Trump Says He May Not Overturn Roe Vs. Wade
1. Donald Trump Says He May Not Overturn Roe vs. Wade
2. Ben Carson Believes Pro-lifers May Be Responsible For a Recent Shooting
3. Ted Cruz Is Being Misquoted About Whether The Shooter Was Transgendered
(c) 2015, Chaplain Gordon James Klingenschmitt, PhD. Airs 12/15 on NRB Network, TheWalkTV, Roku, GoogleTV, ITunes, IPointTV, Glorystar Satellite
- published: 09 Dec 2015
- views: 222
Peter Charles Hoffer: Roe v. Wade - September 19, 2013
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 42:41
- Updated: 03 Oct 2013
- views: 163
University of Georgia professor Peter Charles Hoffer examines the repercussions of the controversial 1973 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision that upheld a woman...
University of Georgia professor Peter Charles Hoffer examines the repercussions of the controversial 1973 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision that upheld a woman's right to have an abortion and became a flashpoint in the contemporary "culture" war, as part of the Library's Legal Landmarks series on Supreme Court decisions.
http://kclibrary.org
wn.com/Peter Charles Hoffer Roe V. Wade September 19, 2013
University of Georgia professor Peter Charles Hoffer examines the repercussions of the controversial 1973 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision that upheld a woman's right to have an abortion and became a flashpoint in the contemporary "culture" war, as part of the Library's Legal Landmarks series on Supreme Court decisions.
http://kclibrary.org
- published: 03 Oct 2013
- views: 163
GPS SSUSH 25b Roe v Wade, Bakke Case [Video 126]
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 30:03
- Updated: 22 Jul 2013
- views: 110
Tutorial on Unit 9 Standard 25 Substandard b Roe v. Wade and Regents of the University of California in preparation for the Georgia End of Course Test (EOCT) in...
Tutorial on Unit 9 Standard 25 Substandard b Roe v. Wade and Regents of the University of California in preparation for the Georgia End of Course Test (EOCT) in U.S. History.
wn.com/Gps Ssush 25B Roe V Wade, Bakke Case Video 126
Tutorial on Unit 9 Standard 25 Substandard b Roe v. Wade and Regents of the University of California in preparation for the Georgia End of Course Test (EOCT) in U.S. History.
- published: 22 Jul 2013
- views: 110
[467] Fearbola, Reigniting Roe v. Wade, #Newsfail & Torturing Folks Again?
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 28:00
- Updated: 22 Oct 2014
- views: 8242
Abby Martin Breaks the Set on Fearbola, Torture Redux?, Texas’ War on Women & #NewsFail.
LIKE Breaking the Set @ http://fb.me/JournalistAbbyMartin
FOLLOW Ab...
Abby Martin Breaks the Set on Fearbola, Torture Redux?, Texas’ War on Women & #NewsFail.
LIKE Breaking the Set @ http://fb.me/JournalistAbbyMartin
FOLLOW Abby Martin @ http://twitter.com/AbbyMartin
EPISODE BREAKDOWN: On this episode of Breaking the Set, Abby Martin discusses the worst cases of ebola hysteria, citing schools in New Jersey and Maine that have kept teachers and students from attending class for merely travelling to places like Rwanda and Dallas. Abby then discusses the effort by the Obama Administration to suppress the release of never-before-seen photos from the Abu Ghraib prison scandal of 2004 as well as the fact that top National Security Council lawyers are considering whether to regress back to the Bush Administration’s view on torture at overseas sites. Abby then speaks with Terry O’Neill, President of the National Organization for Women, about the battle in Texas over keeping abortion clinics open across the state. BTS wraps up the show with an exclusive interview with co-founders of Citizen Radio and authors of the new book, #NEWSFAIL, Allison Kilkenny and Jamie Kilstein, about the biggest flaws in corporate comedy news and why topics like feminism and climate change are covered so poorly by cable news.
wn.com/467 Fearbola, Reigniting Roe V. Wade, Newsfail Torturing Folks Again
Abby Martin Breaks the Set on Fearbola, Torture Redux?, Texas’ War on Women & #NewsFail.
LIKE Breaking the Set @ http://fb.me/JournalistAbbyMartin
FOLLOW Abby Martin @ http://twitter.com/AbbyMartin
EPISODE BREAKDOWN: On this episode of Breaking the Set, Abby Martin discusses the worst cases of ebola hysteria, citing schools in New Jersey and Maine that have kept teachers and students from attending class for merely travelling to places like Rwanda and Dallas. Abby then discusses the effort by the Obama Administration to suppress the release of never-before-seen photos from the Abu Ghraib prison scandal of 2004 as well as the fact that top National Security Council lawyers are considering whether to regress back to the Bush Administration’s view on torture at overseas sites. Abby then speaks with Terry O’Neill, President of the National Organization for Women, about the battle in Texas over keeping abortion clinics open across the state. BTS wraps up the show with an exclusive interview with co-founders of Citizen Radio and authors of the new book, #NEWSFAIL, Allison Kilkenny and Jamie Kilstein, about the biggest flaws in corporate comedy news and why topics like feminism and climate change are covered so poorly by cable news.
- published: 22 Oct 2014
- views: 8242
Face of Pro-Life #182: Roe v. Wade and Wall St.
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 29:06
- Updated: 02 Jul 2012
- views: 146
Ave Maria!
Friar Roderic and Corinn Dahm discuss a rather strange article found on Bloomberg's website titled How Roe v. Wade Empowered U.S. Investors. So if a...
Ave Maria!
Friar Roderic and Corinn Dahm discuss a rather strange article found on Bloomberg's website titled How Roe v. Wade Empowered U.S. Investors. So if a financial news site can focus on the landmark pro-abortion decision then we at the Face of Prolife can discuss finance, and so we did. Find out how the most radical liberal pro-abortion ruling has resulted in fiscal conservative presidents and congresses which have Wall Street cheering and Pro-lifers booing and how liberals democrats may actually have more incentive to fight Roe v. Wade than conservative, pro-life republicans.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-14/how-roe-v-wade-empowered-u-s-investors.html
Ave Maria!
To Download Audio go to http://airmaria.com?p=28418
wn.com/Face Of Pro Life 182 Roe V. Wade And Wall St.
Ave Maria!
Friar Roderic and Corinn Dahm discuss a rather strange article found on Bloomberg's website titled How Roe v. Wade Empowered U.S. Investors. So if a financial news site can focus on the landmark pro-abortion decision then we at the Face of Prolife can discuss finance, and so we did. Find out how the most radical liberal pro-abortion ruling has resulted in fiscal conservative presidents and congresses which have Wall Street cheering and Pro-lifers booing and how liberals democrats may actually have more incentive to fight Roe v. Wade than conservative, pro-life republicans.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-14/how-roe-v-wade-empowered-u-s-investors.html
Ave Maria!
To Download Audio go to http://airmaria.com?p=28418
- published: 02 Jul 2012
- views: 146
Roe at 40: What We Have Learned | Roe v. Wade in History
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 97:33
- Updated: 20 Jun 2013
- views: 674
On March 7, 2013, the Stanford Constitutional Law Center hosted the 2-day conference "Roe at 40: What We Have Learned."
The academic conference reflected on R...
On March 7, 2013, the Stanford Constitutional Law Center hosted the 2-day conference "Roe at 40: What We Have Learned."
The academic conference reflected on Roe's legacy in jurisprudence and politics, the ethical and legal status of the unborn, and future reproductive rights issues.
The panel "Roe v. Wade in History" was moderated by Stanford Law School Professor Amalia Kessler and featured
University of Pittsburgh School of Law's David Garrow, Americans United for Life's Clarke Forsythe and Judge A. Raymond Randolph, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
wn.com/Roe At 40 What We Have Learned | Roe V. Wade In History
On March 7, 2013, the Stanford Constitutional Law Center hosted the 2-day conference "Roe at 40: What We Have Learned."
The academic conference reflected on Roe's legacy in jurisprudence and politics, the ethical and legal status of the unborn, and future reproductive rights issues.
The panel "Roe v. Wade in History" was moderated by Stanford Law School Professor Amalia Kessler and featured
University of Pittsburgh School of Law's David Garrow, Americans United for Life's Clarke Forsythe and Judge A. Raymond Randolph, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
- published: 20 Jun 2013
- views: 674
2016 S Roe v Wade Panel Discussion Jan 23
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 106:04
- Updated: 01 Feb 2016
- views: 36
The Tragic History of Roe v. Wade
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 86:53
- Updated: 01 Mar 2013
- views: 131
Defending life in 2013. The Tragic History of Roe v. Wade. Tuesday, January 15th at the University of St. Thomas. Featuring Clarke Forsyth, Americans United f...
Defending life in 2013. The Tragic History of Roe v. Wade. Tuesday, January 15th at the University of St. Thomas. Featuring Clarke Forsyth, Americans United for Life, Senior Counsel.
Sponsored by, The Prolife Center at UST.
wn.com/The Tragic History Of Roe V. Wade
Defending life in 2013. The Tragic History of Roe v. Wade. Tuesday, January 15th at the University of St. Thomas. Featuring Clarke Forsyth, Americans United for Life, Senior Counsel.
Sponsored by, The Prolife Center at UST.
- published: 01 Mar 2013
- views: 131
Roe v. Wade - 40 Years #510
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 28:38
- Updated: 24 Jan 2013
- views: 3099
"On the Box with Ray Comfort" is a daily (Monday through Friday) live, 27-minute, web-based talk show hosted by Ray Comfort and the Living Waters team. http://w...
"On the Box with Ray Comfort" is a daily (Monday through Friday) live, 27-minute, web-based talk show hosted by Ray Comfort and the Living Waters team. http://www.ustream.tv/channel/on-the-box
Episode #510
wn.com/Roe V. Wade 40 Years 510
"On the Box with Ray Comfort" is a daily (Monday through Friday) live, 27-minute, web-based talk show hosted by Ray Comfort and the Living Waters team. http://www.ustream.tv/channel/on-the-box
Episode #510
- published: 24 Jan 2013
- views: 3099
close fullscreen
- Playlist
- Chat
close fullscreen
- Playlist
- Chat
10:52
Roe vs Wade Explained: US History Review
A direct explanation of the 1973 Supreme Court Decision which legalized abortion across th...
published: 30 Apr 2014
Roe vs Wade Explained: US History Review
Roe vs Wade Explained: US History Review
- Report rights infringement
- published: 30 Apr 2014
- views: 28432
3:39
Roe v. Wade in PBS' The Supreme Court
In 1973, the Supreme Court delivers its opinion on abortion. With Roe v. Wade, states can ...
published: 01 Dec 2008
Roe v. Wade in PBS' The Supreme Court
Roe v. Wade in PBS' The Supreme Court
- Report rights infringement
- published: 01 Dec 2008
- views: 86466
29:57
Roe v Wade: 40 Years On... The Legal History & Future of Reproductive Rights
For more information, visit LawJournalTV.com.
published: 25 Feb 2013
Roe v Wade: 40 Years On... The Legal History & Future of Reproductive Rights
Roe v Wade: 40 Years On... The Legal History & Future of Reproductive Rights
- Report rights infringement
- published: 25 Feb 2013
- views: 8443
7:40
Roe v Wade - Episode 6
Abortion's been legal in America for more than 40 years but the debate ain't over yet. We ...
published: 12 Sep 2014
Roe v Wade - Episode 6
Roe v Wade - Episode 6
- Report rights infringement
- published: 12 Sep 2014
- views: 1656
3:09
Justice Antonin Scalia talks about Roe v. Wade.
Justice Antonin Scalia talks to CNN's Piers Morgan about Roe v. Wade and abortion rights.
...
published: 19 Jul 2012
Justice Antonin Scalia talks about Roe v. Wade.
Justice Antonin Scalia talks about Roe v. Wade.
- Report rights infringement
- published: 19 Jul 2012
- views: 27846
1:20
Roe v. Wade
The key to defeating Roe v. Wade is Personhood.
published: 13 Sep 2011
Roe v. Wade
Roe v. Wade
- Report rights infringement
- published: 13 Sep 2011
- views: 24427
60:21
Supreme Court Justices on Roe v. Wade
SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) Justices discuss abortion, judicial philosophy...
published: 16 Nov 2014
Supreme Court Justices on Roe v. Wade
Supreme Court Justices on Roe v. Wade
- Report rights infringement
- published: 16 Nov 2014
- views: 18821
8:03
Roe v. Wade Documentary
This is a documentary that we made for a history project in school. It's about the Court c...
published: 02 Mar 2011
Roe v. Wade Documentary
Roe v. Wade Documentary
- Report rights infringement
- published: 02 Mar 2011
- views: 20241
35:46
Roe v. Wade, 40 years later
Subscribe to our channel http://bit.ly/AJSubscribe
We examine why some states are passing...
published: 29 Jan 2013
Roe v. Wade, 40 years later
Roe v. Wade, 40 years later
- Report rights infringement
- published: 29 Jan 2013
- views: 5387
8:30
Before Roe v. Wade: Personal Stories
Back Alley Abortion stories described in the first person. http://www.choiceatrisk.org
published: 07 Sep 2012
Before Roe v. Wade: Personal Stories
Before Roe v. Wade: Personal Stories
- Report rights infringement
- published: 07 Sep 2012
- views: 11620
64:43
Roe v. Wade: U.S. Supreme Court - Lawyers Present Oral Arguments (1971)
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Cour...
published: 06 Aug 2013
Roe v. Wade: U.S. Supreme Court - Lawyers Present Oral Arguments (1971)
Roe v. Wade: U.S. Supreme Court - Lawyers Present Oral Arguments (1971)
- Report rights infringement
- published: 06 Aug 2013
- views: 5498
1:03
Norma ("Jane Roe" of Roe v. Wade) Speaks About Being Pro-Life
"Jane Roe" of Roe v. Wade is now a pro-life activist. Watch her commercial about it, which...
published: 09 Jan 2013
Norma ("Jane Roe" of Roe v. Wade) Speaks About Being Pro-Life
Norma ("Jane Roe" of Roe v. Wade) Speaks About Being Pro-Life
- Report rights infringement
- published: 09 Jan 2013
- views: 11248
10:25
Roe v. Wade: The Debate over Abortion
I created this documentary for the 2014 National History Day NJ State Competition. The fil...
published: 13 Dec 2014
Roe v. Wade: The Debate over Abortion
Roe v. Wade: The Debate over Abortion
- Report rights infringement
- published: 13 Dec 2014
- views: 455
10:01
Roe v. Wade and The United States Abortion Debate
Ten minute documentary for National History Day on the abortion debate in the Untied State...
published: 16 Jan 2011
Roe v. Wade and The United States Abortion Debate
Roe v. Wade and The United States Abortion Debate
- Report rights infringement
- published: 16 Jan 2011
- views: 12686
close fullscreen
- Playlist
- Chat
25:21
Voices of Choice: Physicians Who Provided Abortions Before Roe v. Wade
Voices of Choice: Physicians Who Provided Abortions Before Roe v. Wade, a 25-minute film c...
published: 22 Jan 2013
Voices of Choice: Physicians Who Provided Abortions Before Roe v. Wade
Voices of Choice: Physicians Who Provided Abortions Before Roe v. Wade
- Report rights infringement
- published: 22 Jan 2013
- views: 4345
28:00
Roe v Wade Abortion Rights Battle, 2016 | Acronym TV [54]
Episode guide: 00:01 Intro
2:00 "March for Life" or "March for Forced Motherhood and Fem...
published: 20 Jan 2016
Roe v Wade Abortion Rights Battle, 2016 | Acronym TV [54]
Roe v Wade Abortion Rights Battle, 2016 | Acronym TV [54]
- Report rights infringement
- published: 20 Jan 2016
- views: 416
63:41
Roe v. Wade Re-Argued: U.S. Supreme Court - Lawyers Present Oral Arguments (1972)
Roe v. Wade reached the Supreme Court on appeal in 1970. The Justices delayed taking actio...
published: 07 Aug 2013
Roe v. Wade Re-Argued: U.S. Supreme Court - Lawyers Present Oral Arguments (1972)
Roe v. Wade Re-Argued: U.S. Supreme Court - Lawyers Present Oral Arguments (1972)
- Report rights infringement
- published: 07 Aug 2013
- views: 2334
63:26
Abortion Debate Attorneys Present Roe v Wade Supreme Court Pro Life Pro Choice Arguments 1971
Full Documentary,
Documentary,documentary films,documentary history channel,documentary...
published: 07 Jul 2015
Abortion Debate Attorneys Present Roe v Wade Supreme Court Pro Life Pro Choice Arguments 1971
Abortion Debate Attorneys Present Roe v Wade Supreme Court Pro Life Pro Choice Arguments 1971
- Report rights infringement
- published: 07 Jul 2015
- views: 111
64:43
Abortion Debate: Attorneys Present Roe v. Wade Supreme Court Pro-Life / Pro-Choice Arguments (1971)
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Cour...
published: 01 Jan 2013
Abortion Debate: Attorneys Present Roe v. Wade Supreme Court Pro-Life / Pro-Choice Arguments (1971)
Abortion Debate: Attorneys Present Roe v. Wade Supreme Court Pro-Life / Pro-Choice Arguments (1971)
- Report rights infringement
- published: 01 Jan 2013
- views: 18001
43:33
What Happened to Justices of Roe v Wade When they Met their Maker?
The 15th sermon in the Sermon Series called "True Law Is God's Law" with Pastor David Whit...
published: 18 Jan 2016
What Happened to Justices of Roe v Wade When they Met their Maker?
What Happened to Justices of Roe v Wade When they Met their Maker?
- Report rights infringement
- published: 18 Jan 2016
- views: 601
28:31
Andrew Wommack - Special Roe V. Wade Programs (Ep.1) - Gospel Truth (18.01.2016)
Andrew Wommack - Special Roe V. Wade Programs (Ep.1) - Gospel Truth (18.01.2016)
For over ...
published: 18 Jan 2016
Andrew Wommack - Special Roe V. Wade Programs (Ep.1) - Gospel Truth (18.01.2016)
Andrew Wommack - Special Roe V. Wade Programs (Ep.1) - Gospel Truth (18.01.2016)
- Report rights infringement
- published: 18 Jan 2016
- views: 202
28:31
Andrew Wommack - Special Roe V. Wade Programs (Ep.2) - Gospel Truth (19.01.2016)
Andrew Wommack - Special Roe V. Wade Programs (Ep.2) - Gospel Truth (19.01.2016)
For over ...
published: 19 Jan 2016
Andrew Wommack - Special Roe V. Wade Programs (Ep.2) - Gospel Truth (19.01.2016)
Andrew Wommack - Special Roe V. Wade Programs (Ep.2) - Gospel Truth (19.01.2016)
- Report rights infringement
- published: 19 Jan 2016
- views: 129
57:55
Abuse of Discretion: The Inside Story of Roe v. Wade
Based on 20 years of research, including an examination of the papers of eight of the nine...
published: 23 Jan 2014
Abuse of Discretion: The Inside Story of Roe v. Wade
Abuse of Discretion: The Inside Story of Roe v. Wade
- Report rights infringement
- published: 23 Jan 2014
- views: 1769
61:06
40 Years Later: Roe v. Wade, Natural Law, and the Jurisprudence of Abortion
Join the Federalist Society and renowned Natural Law Theorist Professor Hadley Arkes on th...
published: 23 Jan 2013
40 Years Later: Roe v. Wade, Natural Law, and the Jurisprudence of Abortion
40 Years Later: Roe v. Wade, Natural Law, and the Jurisprudence of Abortion
- Report rights infringement
- published: 23 Jan 2013
- views: 1663
28:32
Donald Trump Says He May Not Overturn Roe vs. Wade
1. Donald Trump Says He May Not Overturn Roe vs. Wade
2. Ben Carson Believes Pro-lifers ...
published: 09 Dec 2015
Donald Trump Says He May Not Overturn Roe vs. Wade
Donald Trump Says He May Not Overturn Roe vs. Wade
- Report rights infringement
- published: 09 Dec 2015
- views: 222
42:41
Peter Charles Hoffer: Roe v. Wade - September 19, 2013
University of Georgia professor Peter Charles Hoffer examines the repercussions of the con...
published: 03 Oct 2013
Peter Charles Hoffer: Roe v. Wade - September 19, 2013
Peter Charles Hoffer: Roe v. Wade - September 19, 2013
- Report rights infringement
- published: 03 Oct 2013
- views: 163
30:03
GPS SSUSH 25b Roe v Wade, Bakke Case [Video 126]
Tutorial on Unit 9 Standard 25 Substandard b Roe v. Wade and Regents of the University of ...
published: 22 Jul 2013
GPS SSUSH 25b Roe v Wade, Bakke Case [Video 126]
GPS SSUSH 25b Roe v Wade, Bakke Case [Video 126]
- Report rights infringement
- published: 22 Jul 2013
- views: 110
28:00
[467] Fearbola, Reigniting Roe v. Wade, #Newsfail & Torturing Folks Again?
Abby Martin Breaks the Set on Fearbola, Torture Redux?, Texas’ War on Women & #NewsFail. ...
published: 22 Oct 2014
[467] Fearbola, Reigniting Roe v. Wade, #Newsfail & Torturing Folks Again?
[467] Fearbola, Reigniting Roe v. Wade, #Newsfail & Torturing Folks Again?
- Report rights infringement
- published: 22 Oct 2014
- views: 8242
Voices of Choice: Physicians Who Provided Abortion...
![Roe v Wade Abortion Rights Battle, 2016 | Acronym TV [54]](http://web.archive.org./web/20160425020916/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FndPWY_5A3A/0.jpg)
Roe v Wade Abortion Rights Battle, 2016 | Acronym ...
Roe v. Wade Re-Argued: U.S. Supreme Court - Lawyer...
Abortion Debate Attorneys Present Roe v Wade Sup...
Abortion Debate: Attorneys Present Roe v. Wade Sup...
What Happened to Justices of Roe v Wade When they ...
Andrew Wommack - Special Roe V. Wade Programs (Ep....
Andrew Wommack - Special Roe V. Wade Programs (Ep....
Abuse of Discretion: The Inside Story of Roe v. Wa...
40 Years Later: Roe v. Wade, Natural Law, and the ...
Donald Trump Says He May Not Overturn Roe vs. Wade...
Peter Charles Hoffer: Roe v. Wade - September 19, ...
![GPS SSUSH 25b Roe v Wade, Bakke Case [Video 126]](http://web.archive.org./web/20160425020916/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/hrm8XBppYhA/0.jpg)
GPS SSUSH 25b Roe v Wade, Bakke Case [Video 126]...
![[467] Fearbola, Reigniting Roe v. Wade, #Newsfail & Torturin](http://web.archive.org./web/20160425020916/http://i.ytimg.com/vi/H-lzQY7QkcU/0.jpg)
[467] Fearbola, Reigniting Roe v. Wade, #Newsfail ...
Face of Pro-Life #182: Roe v. Wade and Wall St....
Roe at 40: What We Have Learned | Roe v. Wade in H...
2016 S Roe v Wade Panel Discussion Jan 23...
The Tragic History of Roe v. Wade...
Roe v. Wade - 40 Years #510...
-
Lyrics list:text lyricsplay full screenplay karaoke
photo: WN / Imran Nissar
World heading for catastrophe over natural disasters, risk expert warns
Edit The Guardian 24 Apr 2016
With cascading crises – where one event triggers another – set to rise, international disaster risk reduction efforts are woefully underfunded. Global development is supported by. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. @swajones ... Last year, earthquakes, floods, heatwaves and landslides left (pdf). Yet the international community spends less than half of one per cent of the global aid budget on mitigating the risks posed by such hazards ... ....
photo: Creative Commons / Radio Okapi
World music star Papa Wemba dies after collapsing on stage
Edit The Hindu 24 Apr 2016
Papa Wemba, a musician known around the world as the king of Congolese rumba, has died following a collapse on stage during a concert, officials said. He was 66. Culture Minister Baudouin Banza Mukalay confirmed the musician’s death on Sunday, calling it a “great loss for the country and all of Africa.” ... He was taken to a nearby clinic, but couldn’t be resuscitated ... Keywords....
photo: AP
'Adorable' Prince George wows Obama in pyjamas
Edit Deccan Herald 23 Apr 2016
Barack Obama has described Prince George as "adorable" after the 2-year-old son of Prince William and Kate Middleton was allowed to stay up past his bed-time to meet the US President. The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge hosted Obama and wife Michelle for an informal dinner at Kensington Palace in London last night, after which photographs were released of the guests kneeling down to shake hands with the young prince in his pyjamas ... ....
photo: AP / Sunday Alamba
Africa's longest serving leader seeks new 7-year term
Edit Graphic 24 Apr 2016
The country's opposition leaders and international civil society groups have already dismissed Sunday's vote as "not credible". President Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo faces six mostly unknown opponents, with most of the opposition boycotting the poll ... Critics accuse the 73-year-old of failing to distribute the country's oil wealth to the population of about 700,000 ... In the last election in 2009, Obiang won 97 percent of the vote....
photo: AP / Evan Agostini
Kim Kardashian posts steamy NSFW photos from friend’s wedding
Edit Celebrity Café 24 Apr 2016« back to news headlines
Why Republicans love comparing abortion to slavery
Edit Vox 24 Apr 2016
Dred Scott is a popular comparison among anti-abortion advocates; they say that it's just as unjust a ruling as Roe v. Wade, and they hope that someday Roe will also be overturned ... Bush once confused pundits by mentioning Dred Scott during a presidential debate, but abortion opponents understood the Roe v. Wade reference loud and clear....
photo: AP / Gerald Herbert
Hadley Freeman: I like Bernie as much as the next idealist, but Hillary gets my vote
Edit The Guardian 23 Apr 2016
Young Americans don’t like Hillary Clinton – she’s the broccoli candidate – but would Sanders get anything done as president?. @HadleyFreeman. Donald Trump talking about the size of his genitals during a presidential debate. I should have predicted that ... Bad) ... The best spin the Democratic National Committee could put on this was claiming that young women today are complacent, having lived their entire lives after Roe v Wade ... Related ... ....
Oklahoma GOPer Suggests God Will Pay For Costly Legal Battle Over Abortion Ban
Edit TPM 22 Apr 2016
An Oklahoma lawmaker pushing a bill that would more-or-less ban abortion in the state dismissed concerns that the legislation would drag the cash-strapped state into a costly legal battle by suggesting God would take care of the state's financial issues ... "Don't let people tell you, 'Unconstitutional arguments, Roe v. Wade,' all this," Brumbaugh said, referencing the Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion nationwide. ....
Oklahoma House Passes Measure Banning Abortion > (Center for Reproductive Rights)
Edit Public Technologies 22 Apr 2016
(Source. Center for Reproductive Rights). 04.22.16 - The Oklahoma House of Representatives passed a measure (SB 1552) yesterday which bans abortion by making it a felony for any person to perform or induce an abortion ... Said Amanda Allen, Senior State Legislative Counsel at the Center for Reproductive Rights. ... The U.S. Supreme Court has consistently -first in Roe v. Wade and again most recently in Planned Parenthood v ... Original Document....
Abortion: A Quick History Lesson (Harvard College Democrats)
Edit Public Technologies 22 Apr 2016
(Source. Harvard College Democrats). Written By Elise Laird '19. A Quick History Lesson on One of Our Country's Most Important Issues. Our Founding Fathers did not address the issue of abortion when writing the Constitution, nor when outlining the Bill of Rights ... This led up to the landmark decision made in 1973, Roe v. Wade, which struck down all existing criminal abortion laws ... Then in 2007, Gonzales v ... Original Document ... (noodl. 33211452) ....
What Donald Trump, and most Republicans, don't understand about abortion "exceptions"
Edit Vox 22 Apr 2016
Donald Trump said during a town hall on NBC's Today show Thursday that he would "absolutely" change the Republican platform to allow exceptions to abortion bans in cases of rape, incest, or saving the pregnant woman's life ... "And it makes no exceptions for rape, for incest, for the life of the mother ... Under the Supreme Court's 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade, any abortion restriction is supposed to include an exception for a woman's health....
Planned Parenthood IDs Sen. Kelly Ayotte as First 2016 Target
Edit Breitbart 21 Apr 2016
The $400,000 ad buy slams Ayotte for adhering to the GOP’s promise to its constituents to not hold hearings on President Barack Obama’s liberal nominee to the Supreme Court, and for Ayotte’s support of overturning the controversial 1973 Roe v....
Maybe we really do have to blow up the system to save it: Bob Quarteroni
Edit Penn Live 21 Apr 2016
By Bob Quarteroni ... Bob Quarteroni (PennLive file) ... We've tried incremental changes and tweaks and passed reform legislation and on and on, and we still have a political dung heap, and it's collecting more flies every day ... If a Republican actually won, we'd see the repeal – or attempts to repeal – Roe v. Wade, Obamacare, election rights, equal pay and anything else their evil little minds can think of ... And Trump? ... ....
‘No Trump’ Bid, Democrat Grand Slam
Edit The American Spectator 21 Apr 2016
It included these paragraphs. ... For such folks the old adage applies ... Do not expect Hillary to emulate JFK and pick the likes of Byron White, a centrist judge who wrote the dissent calling Roe v. Wade an “exercise of raw judicial power.… an improvident and extravagant exercise of the power of judicial review.” A Hillary presidency for even one term, let alone, two, will tilt the Supreme Court leftward for at least a generation ... ....
Planned Parenthood targets Ayotte in first 2016 Senate ad
Edit The Oklahoman 19 Apr 2016
It uses a clip of Ayotte saying she wants to see Roe v. Wade overturned and says she is abdicating her duties by blocking the president's court nominee ... ....
Planned Parenthood targets Ayotte in first 2016 Senate TV ad
Edit The Oklahoman 19 Apr 2016
CONCORD, N.H. (AP) — Republican Sen ... The group's decision to kick off the cycle by spending against Ayotte underscores the high-stakes nature of the race between Ayotte and Democratic Gov. Maggie Hassan ... The ad says Ayotte is abdicating her duties by opposing hearings on the court nominee; it uses a clip of Ayotte saying she would like to see the nation's landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, overturned ... ....
Clinton emphasizes gender in lead-up to New York primary
Edit WPTV 19 Apr 2016
When Hillary Clinton ran for president in 2008, she rarely mentioned her gender as a distinguishing feature, but she has repeatedly done so in 2016 ... There was no mistaking the topic of the afternoon ... Kirsten Gillibrand, former Arizona Rep ... Speaking on the issue of Roe v. Wade and women’s access to abortions, Clinton compared Republicans’ prolife stance to communist governments in China and once Russia-governed Romania ... ....
When Doctors Refuse to Treat LGBT Patients
Edit The Atlantic 19 Apr 2016
Andrey Popov / Shutterstock / Paul Spella / The Atlantic. Being lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender is not a disease ... * * * ... Almost immediately after the Supreme Court ruled in Roe v. Wade in 1973, Congress passed an amendment to an existing health-care law clarifying that even hospitals and facilities that receive federal funding don’t have to provide abortions or sterilizations if they have religious or moral objections to doing so....
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next page »
