I should say that my views have changed and that the prior posts of this blog are no longer accurate of how I feel now. I should say how that is, a little, apropos the ism in general, anarchism, primitivism, nihilism, and radical ecology.
Firstly I’ve changed my attitude toward the act of identifying with or believing in something. Beliefs change and restructure with each other all the time. The mind or soul is something of an open space for these, something I like to garden or tend to like a garden, but I am not trying to keep any of the crops in it eternally alive or perfectly protected, and this includes any principle which an attitude of an ism can seize and protect and attempt to keep alive. Maybe some are like trees that will outlast me so to speak, but everything dies if it’s a thing. Another metaphor is that beliefs are like a set of sandcastles, which disappear in the waves, and the mind is where they are spontaneously being built anew, despite their inevitable disappearance. The point is the gardening or the sandcastle making activities themselves, the background conditions that allow them and must be worked with, more so than the crops or sandcastles themselves. Now, I realize this point can itself be suffixed with an ism, and in that case, I am an ist of whatever it is. But still I distance myself from the ism’d phenomenon. So what is it to ism?