Jamal Greene

@jamalgreene

Dwight Professor of Law . Co-Chair . How Rights Went Wrong (), PROSE finalist. My views.

New York, NY
law.columbia.edu/faculty/jamal-…
Registrerte seg mai 2009
24 bilder og videoer Bilder og videoer

Tweets

Du har blokkert @jamalgreene

Er du sikker på at du vil vise disse tweetene? Dette vil ikke oppheve blokkeringen av @@jamalgreene.

  1. 8. apr.

    Wallace’s position here is wild.

    This apparently is a hard truth that so many whites struggle to accept. But I I was driven to write abt lynching to address precisely this truth: that this racial terrorism was so often perpetrated,cheered & watched by ordinary white men & women of all ages in both north & south.
    Vis denne tråden
    7 svar 2 retweets 25 liker
    Angre
  2. 7. apr.

    Congratulations to Ketanji Brown Jackson, her family, and the nation.

    16 retweets 217 liker
    Angre
  3. 7. apr.

    My favorite of many good lines in this very good essay: "But however my mix of class norms and guidelines evolve, they’ll grow up from experience, not simply downward from the abstract principles of academic freedom found in statements like Chicago’s."

    1 svar 3 retweets 20 liker
    Angre
  4. Retweetet
    6. apr.

    This amazing symposium is taking place in two days. RSVP now to hear , , , , and others discuss the thorny question of how we should or should not regulate lies. I'm not lying! It's going to be great.

    APRIL 8: Lies and in public discourse raise many questions about the health of our democracy & the role of the First Amendment. RSVP to hear leading scholars spanning tech, law, social science & history address these complex issues.
    20 retweets 29 liker
    Angre
  5. 2. apr.

    Your occasional reminder that a failed effort to replace a swing justice (Powell) w/ an extreme candidate (Bork) while not holding the Senate (!), followed by unanimous confirmation of a less extreme conservative candidate (Kennedy) is normal, healthy politics under divided govt.

    8 svar 44 retweets 389 liker
    Angre
  6. 2. apr.

    The approach I urge certainly doesn't evade discretion, which is impossible, but it has well-developed analogues in well-functioning judicial systems around the world. The US is the outlier. I encourage all to read both the book & the review and reach their own conclusions. (2/2)

    15 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  7. 2. apr.

    I very much appreciate 's review, though naturally I disagree in a number of respects. Hard to summarize in this medium, but it boils down to my view that prevailing US practices are considerably more chaotic, unjust, & arbitrary than I think is implied here. (1/2)

    What would constitutional law look like if SCOTUS applied a "proportionality" approach to constitutional adjudication. I don't think it would be pretty. Or very protective. My review of 's excellent book, When Rights Went Wrong via
    1 svar 2 retweets 15 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  8. Retweetet
    29. mar.

    On Resentment. 's second Ambedkar lecture at on Thursday 31st. Registration here:

    2 svar 12 retweets 39 liker
    Angre
  9. Retweetet
    26. mar.

    My annual letter of recommendation tweet: Do not feel bad asking professors for letters. 1) It's our job. We are not doing you a favor. 2) How do you think we got our jobs? We've asked for many letters. It's the Circle of Life. Don't sweat it, just give your writers enough time.

    52 svar 940 retweets 7 459 liker
    Angre
  10. Retweetet
    25. mar.

    Not enough people know: NYC is now offering *free, same-day home delivery* of paxlovid (new, effective anti-viral pill). If you test pos, especially if you're hi-risk, ask your doc about this treatment. If you don't have a doc call 212-COVID19. And for now we have good supply.

    214 svar 4 108 retweets 9 492 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  11. Retweetet
    26. mar.

    “Time,” writes, “is the tribute a court pays to diversity. It’s an acknowledgement that five elite lawyers can never — and should never — be too sure that their vision of the law is right, and others wrong.”

    6 retweets 18 liker
    Angre
  12. Retweetet
    25. mar.

    When the Supreme Court “fires shots across the bow instead of straight at the hull, it gives ‘We the People’ a chance to respond through politics, the ultimate recourse of a self-governing people,” writes.

    1 svar 6 retweets 13 liker
    Angre
  13. 25. mar.

    From me.

    10 svar 27 retweets 128 liker
    Angre
  14. Retweetet
    24. mar.

    Register here for 's April 8 symposium--featuring & many others. It will be really good!

    11 retweets 21 liker
    Angre
  15. 23. mar.

    Corey Booker is making me tear up, and I'm super cynical.

    8 svar 17 retweets 395 liker
    Angre
  16. 23. mar.

    The Article III question is whether the person was subject to a sex classification. This does not depend on how they define their gender.

    2:56
    "If I decide right now that I'm a woman, then apparently, I'm a woman. Does that mean that I would have Article III standing to challenge a gender-based restriction?" . repeatedly pressed Judge Jackson on the court's standards for race and gender discrimination.
    1 svar 2 retweets 37 liker
    Angre
  17. 21. mar.

    v v v v

    The thing that I can never get over about modern-day confirmation hearings is that we have an ENTIRE DAY of members giving speeches followed by a brief statement by the nominee, and then the day ends, all before anyone has asked a question of anyone.
    1 svar 9 liker
    Angre
  18. Retweetet
    19. mar.

    America’s free speech problem.

    0:55
    Ever see a one-minute committee meeting? Alabama House State Gov’t Committee passes anti-CRT bill without allowing Black lawmakers to speak.
    Vis denne tråden
    153 svar 2 143 retweets 5 629 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  19. 16. mar.

    This is madness.

    Late to an important doctor’s appointment because of a trucker convoy protest in NE DC. Driver said he would only let me by if I swore to him that my appointment wasn’t for an abortion.
    Vis denne tråden
    1 svar 2 retweets 14 liker
    Angre
  20. 14. mar.

    Still got it!

    I distinctly remember the weird feeling of being older than a pro athlete when Kobe Bryant entered the league. With Tom Brady's retirement, I cross the other threshold. Kind of poignant as I think back on how young I felt in locker rooms as a very junior reporter. Time flies.
    2 svar 26 liker
    Angre

@jamalgreene har ikke Tweetet enda.

Lastingen ser ut til å ta sin tid.

Twitter kan være overbelastet, eller det kan ha oppstått et midlertidig problem. Prøv igjen, eller se Twitters status for mer informasjon.

    Du vil kanskje også like

    ·