Jamal Greene

@jamalgreene

Dwight Professor of Law . Co-Chair . How Rights Went Wrong (), PROSE finalist. My views.

New York, NY
law.columbia.edu/faculty/jamal-…
Inscrit en mai 2009
24 Photos et vidéos Photos et vidéos

Tweets

Vous avez bloqué @jamalgreene

Êtes-vous sûr de vouloir voir ces Tweets ? Les voir ne débloquera pas @jamalgreene

  1. 8 avr.

    Wallace’s position here is wild.

    This apparently is a hard truth that so many whites struggle to accept. But I I was driven to write abt lynching to address precisely this truth: that this racial terrorism was so often perpetrated,cheered & watched by ordinary white men & women of all ages in both north & south.
    Afficher cette discussion
    7 réponses 2 Retweets 24 j'aime
    Supprimer
  2. 7 avr.

    Congratulations to Ketanji Brown Jackson, her family, and the nation.

    16 Retweets 217 j'aime
    Supprimer
  3. 7 avr.

    My favorite of many good lines in this very good essay: "But however my mix of class norms and guidelines evolve, they’ll grow up from experience, not simply downward from the abstract principles of academic freedom found in statements like Chicago’s."

    1 réponse 3 Retweets 20 j'aime
    Supprimer
  4. a retweeté
    6 avr.

    This amazing symposium is taking place in two days. RSVP now to hear , , , , and others discuss the thorny question of how we should or should not regulate lies. I'm not lying! It's going to be great.

    APRIL 8: Lies and in public discourse raise many questions about the health of our democracy & the role of the First Amendment. RSVP to hear leading scholars spanning tech, law, social science & history address these complex issues.
    20 Retweets 29 j'aime
    Supprimer
  5. 2 avr.

    Your occasional reminder that a failed effort to replace a swing justice (Powell) w/ an extreme candidate (Bork) while not holding the Senate (!), followed by unanimous confirmation of a less extreme conservative candidate (Kennedy) is normal, healthy politics under divided govt.

    8 réponses 44 Retweets 389 j'aime
    Supprimer
  6. 2 avr.

    The approach I urge certainly doesn't evade discretion, which is impossible, but it has well-developed analogues in well-functioning judicial systems around the world. The US is the outlier. I encourage all to read both the book & the review and reach their own conclusions. (2/2)

    15 j'aime
    Afficher cette discussion
    Afficher cette discussion
    Supprimer
  7. 2 avr.

    I very much appreciate 's review, though naturally I disagree in a number of respects. Hard to summarize in this medium, but it boils down to my view that prevailing US practices are considerably more chaotic, unjust, & arbitrary than I think is implied here. (1/2)

    What would constitutional law look like if SCOTUS applied a "proportionality" approach to constitutional adjudication. I don't think it would be pretty. Or very protective. My review of 's excellent book, When Rights Went Wrong via
    1 réponse 2 Retweets 15 j'aime
    Afficher cette discussion
    Afficher cette discussion
    Supprimer
  8. a retweeté
    29 mars

    On Resentment. 's second Ambedkar lecture at on Thursday 31st. Registration here:

    2 réponses 12 Retweets 39 j'aime
    Supprimer
  9. a retweeté
    26 mars

    My annual letter of recommendation tweet: Do not feel bad asking professors for letters. 1) It's our job. We are not doing you a favor. 2) How do you think we got our jobs? We've asked for many letters. It's the Circle of Life. Don't sweat it, just give your writers enough time.

    52 réponses 940 Retweets 7 459 j'aime
    Supprimer
  10. a retweeté
    25 mars

    Not enough people know: NYC is now offering *free, same-day home delivery* of paxlovid (new, effective anti-viral pill). If you test pos, especially if you're hi-risk, ask your doc about this treatment. If you don't have a doc call 212-COVID19. And for now we have good supply.

    214 réponses 4 108 Retweets 9 492 j'aime
    Afficher cette discussion
    Afficher cette discussion
    Supprimer
  11. a retweeté
    26 mars

    “Time,” writes, “is the tribute a court pays to diversity. It’s an acknowledgement that five elite lawyers can never — and should never — be too sure that their vision of the law is right, and others wrong.”

    6 Retweets 18 j'aime
    Supprimer
  12. a retweeté
    25 mars

    When the Supreme Court “fires shots across the bow instead of straight at the hull, it gives ‘We the People’ a chance to respond through politics, the ultimate recourse of a self-governing people,” writes.

    1 réponse 6 Retweets 13 j'aime
    Supprimer
  13. 25 mars

    From me.

    10 réponses 27 Retweets 128 j'aime
    Supprimer
  14. a retweeté
    24 mars

    Register here for 's April 8 symposium--featuring & many others. It will be really good!

    11 Retweets 21 j'aime
    Supprimer
  15. 23 mars

    Corey Booker is making me tear up, and I'm super cynical.

    8 réponses 17 Retweets 395 j'aime
    Supprimer
  16. 23 mars

    The Article III question is whether the person was subject to a sex classification. This does not depend on how they define their gender.

    2:56
    "If I decide right now that I'm a woman, then apparently, I'm a woman. Does that mean that I would have Article III standing to challenge a gender-based restriction?" . repeatedly pressed Judge Jackson on the court's standards for race and gender discrimination.
    1 réponse 2 Retweets 37 j'aime
    Supprimer
  17. 21 mars

    v v v v

    The thing that I can never get over about modern-day confirmation hearings is that we have an ENTIRE DAY of members giving speeches followed by a brief statement by the nominee, and then the day ends, all before anyone has asked a question of anyone.
    1 réponse 9 j'aime
    Supprimer
  18. a retweeté
    19 mars

    America’s free speech problem.

    0:55
    Ever see a one-minute committee meeting? Alabama House State Gov’t Committee passes anti-CRT bill without allowing Black lawmakers to speak.
    Afficher cette discussion
    153 réponses 2 143 Retweets 5 629 j'aime
    Afficher cette discussion
    Afficher cette discussion
    Supprimer
  19. 16 mars

    This is madness.

    Late to an important doctor’s appointment because of a trucker convoy protest in NE DC. Driver said he would only let me by if I swore to him that my appointment wasn’t for an abortion.
    Afficher cette discussion
    1 réponse 2 Retweets 14 j'aime
    Supprimer
  20. 14 mars

    Still got it!

    I distinctly remember the weird feeling of being older than a pro athlete when Kobe Bryant entered the league. With Tom Brady's retirement, I cross the other threshold. Kind of poignant as I think back on how young I felt in locker rooms as a very junior reporter. Time flies.
    2 réponses 26 j'aime
    Supprimer

@jamalgreene n'a pas encore tweeté.

Le chargement semble prendre du temps.

Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.

    Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

    ·