[ONLINE ONLY] Shawn Hattingh and Lucien van der Walt, 2013, “Mandela, the ANC and the 1994 Breakthrough: Anarchist / syndicalist reflections on national liberation and South Africa’s transition”

[ONLINE ONLY] Shawn Hattingh and Lucien van der Walt, 2013, “Mandela, the ANC and the 1994 Breakthrough: Anarchist / syndicalist reflections on national liberation and South Africa’s transition,” for anarkismo.net here.

featured image

SUMMARY

The destruction of the apartheid state form, with its odious policies of coercion and racism, was a major triumph for the working class in South Africa and elsewhere, showing that ordinary people can challenge and defeat systems that seem quite unbreakable. Mandela did play a heroic role, but was also the first to admit that “It is not the kings and generals that make history but the masses of the people, the workers, the peasants, the doctors, the clergy.” And indeed, it was the black working class, above all, that through struggle tore down many features of apartheid by the late 1980s, such as the pass law system, the Group Areas Act and numerous other odious laws and policies.

The 1994 transition in South Africa was a political revolution, a break with the apartheid and colonial periods of state-sanctioned white supremacy, a “massive advance” in the conditions of the majority. It introduced a new state, based on non-racialism, in which South Africa was to be a multi-racial, multi-cultural but unified country, founded on human rights; welfare and social policy and legislation was transformed; capitalism was kept in place, but despite this, there were very massive and very real changes, political and material, that made qualitative differences in the daily lives of millions of black and working class people. And for millions, it is precisely the association of Mandela with that victory and with those changes that makes him so emotionally powerful.

Yet at the same time, Mandela’s policies and politics had important limitations that must be faced if the current quandary of South Africa, nearly 20 years later, is to be understood. Mandela never sold out: he was committed to a reformed capitalism, and a parliamentary democracy, and unified South Africa based on equal civil and political rights, a project in which black capitalists and black state elites would loom large. These goals have been achieved, but bring with them numerous problems that must be faced up if the final liberation – including national liberation – of South Africa’s working class is to be achieved.

The 1994 breakthrough was a major victory, but it was not the final one, for a final one requires a radical change in society, towards a libertarian and socialist order based on participatory democracy, human needs rather than profit and power, and social and economic justice, and attention to issues of culture and the psychological impact of apartheid.

As long as the basic legacy of apartheid remains, in education, incomes, housing and other spheres, and as long as the working class of all races is excluded from basic power and wealth by a black and white ruling class, so long will the national question – the deep racial / national divisions in South Africa, and the reality of ongoing racial/ national oppression for the black, Coloured and Indian working class – remain unresolved. And so long will it continue to generate antagonisms and conflicts, the breeding ground for rightwing populist demagogy, xenophobia and crime. By contrast, a powerful black elite, centred on the state and with a growing corporate presence, has achieved its national liberation.


Mandela, the ANC and the 1994 Breakthrough:
Anarchist / syndicalist reflections on national liberation and South Africa’s transition

Shawn Hattingh and Lucien van der Walt
Since Nelson Mandela’s death, thousands of articles and millions of people have paid tribute to him. They have rightly praised him for his stance against the apartheid state, which saw him spend 27 years in prison, his non-racialism, and his contribution to the struggle in South Africa. For much of his life Nelson Mandela was indeed the most prominent figure in the liberation struggles in Africa that were waged in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s. Read more of this post

[Analysis in TRANSLATION] Lucien van der Walt and Michael Schmidt, 2013, “Apresentando Chama Negra”

Portuguese translation of chapter one of Lucien van der Walt and Michael Schmidt, 2009, Black Flame: the revolutionary class politics of anarchism and syndicalism (AK Press, San Francisco, Edinburgh).  More information etc. about Black Flame here.

Source:  Instituto de Teoria e História Anarquista (ITHA) here.

pdflogosmallPDF is here and here

Michael Schmidt e Lucien van der Walt.

“Apresentando Chama Negra”

9 de agosto de 2013 ·

Michael Schmidt e Lucien van der Walt. “Apresentando Chama Negra

Esse texto é a introdução do livro Black Flame: the revolutionary class politics of anarchism and syndicalism [Chama Negra: a política classista e revolucionária do anarquismo e do sindicalismo de intenção revolucionária], de Michael Schmidt e Lucien van der Walt. Nele, os autores sulafricanos introduzem os argumentos que são abordados com mais detalhes no próprio livro, o qual constitui, sem dúvidas, um marco nas novas investigações do anarquismo, colocando as pesquisas em outro patamar. Enquanto o livro completo não é publicado no Brasil, o ITHA disponibiliza essa introdução no intuito de difundir, ao menos em parte, resultados das recentes pesquisas desses pesquisadores que, já sendo utilizados por alguns autores brasileiros, prometem contribuir determinantemente com o rumo das discussões sobre o anarquismo.

* Baixe o artigo completo aqui: Michael Schmidt e Lucien van der Walt – Apresentando Chama Negra

[Analysis in TRANSLATION] Lucien van der Walt, 2013, “(Re)Construindo um Cânone Anarquista e Sindicalista Global: resposta a Robert Graham e Nathan Jun sobre Chama Negra“

Portuguese translation of Lucien van der Walt, 2013, “(Re)Constructing a Global Anarchist and Syndicalist Canon – a response to Robert Graham and Nathan Jun on ‘Black Flame‘,”  ‘Anarchist Developments in Cultural Studies,’ special issue on ‘Blasting the Canon,’ No 1  (2013), pp. 193-203, which you can read here.

Source:  Instituto de Teoria e História Anarquista (ITHA) here.

pdflogosmallPDF is here and here

Lucien van der Walt

“(Re)Construindo um Cânone Anarquista e Sindicalista Global”

3 de outubro de 2013 ·

Lucien van der Walt. “(Re)Construindo um Cânone Anarquista e Sindicalista Global: resposta a Robert Graham e Nathan Jun sobre Chama Negra“.

Nesse breve texto, Lucien van der Walt, um dos autores de Black Flame [Chama Negra], debate com dois outros autores sobre a questão do cânone anarquista. Van der Walt apresenta reflexões teórico-metodológicas relevantes para os estudos do anarquismo; propondo uma metodologia histórica e sociológica, ele defende-se das acusações dos outros autores, de que sua abordagem seria restrita e dogmática, e demonstra que, distintamente, ela busca ser global e enfatiza o anarquismo como algo importante para os dias de hoje. Nega o argumento sustentado pelos autores, de que existem vários “anarquismos”, colocando que há, em termos históricos, uma ampla tradição anarquista, que compartilha princípios comuns e que possui em M. Bakunin e P. Kropotkin seus maiores representantes.

Esse texto, junto com outros que o ITHA está traduzindo, assim como a própria tradução do livro Chama Negra, visa proporcionar aos leitores de fala portuguesa o acesso a esse grande debate contemporâneo, central a nosso ver, sobre a teoria e a história do anarquismo.

* Baixe o artigo completo aqui: Lucien van der Walt – Reconstruindo um Cânone Anarquista e Sindicalista Global

[Analysis in TRANSLATION] Lucien van der Walt, 2013, “O Papel Histórico do Anarquismo: uma visão global“

Portuguese translation of Lucien van der Walt, February 2012, “Anarchism’s historical role: a global view,” Freedom, pp.  12-14, which you can read here

Source:  Instituto de Teoria e História Anarquista (ITHA) here.

pdflogosmallPDF is here and here 

Lucien van der Walt.

“O Papel Histórico do Anarquismo”

30 de outubro de 2013 ·

Lucien van der Walt. “O Papel Histórico do Anarquismo: uma visão global“.

Esse texto foi elaborado a partir de trechos de uma palestra proferida por Lucien van der Walt na livraria Freedom, de Londres, posteriormente publicada no periódico Freedom, em fevereiro de 2012. Nele, o autor discute brevemente algumas questões que motivaram a produção de Black Flame [Chama Negra], contestando o caso de que a Revolução Espanhola (1936-1939) foi uma exceção no anarquismo. Ele compara anarquismo e marxismo, discute o papel do anarquismo na criação dos primeiros sindicatos revolucionários na América Latina, retoma personagens e episódios importantes do anarquismo e do sindicalismo de intenção revolucionária relevantes na China, África do Sul,  Coréia e Ucrânia e discute a luta anticolonial anarquista. O texto foi complementado com material iconográfico disponibilizado pelo próprio autor.

Esse texto, junto com outros que o ITHA está traduzindo, assim como a própria tradução do livro Chama Negra, visa proporcionar aos leitores de fala portuguesa o acesso a esse grande debate contemporâneo, central a nosso ver, sobre a teoria e a história do anarquismo.

* Baixe o artigo completo aqui: Lucien van der Walt – O Papel Histórico do Anarquismo

[Analysis in TRANSLATION] Lucien van der Walt, 2012, “Kontra-moć, participativna demokracija, obrana revolucije: debata o Black Flame-u , revolucionarnom anarhizmu i historijskom marksizmu”

Croat translation of Lucien van der Walt, 2011, “Counterpower, Participatory Democracy, Revolutionary Defence: debating Black Flame, revolutionary anarchism and historical Marxism,” International Socialism: a quarterly journal of socialist theory, no. 130 , pp. 193-207, which you can read here.

Source: found here

pdflogosmallPDF is online here

Lucien van der Walt

Kontra-moć

Kontra-moć, participativna demokracija, obrana revolucije: debata o Black Flame-u , revolucionarnom anarhizmu i historijskom marksizmuIzdavački komitet Lokalne grupe Rijeka, 2012. Read more of this post

Article [+PDF] Lucien van der Walt, 2001, “Radical South African magazine relaunched”

Lucien van der Walt, 9 May 2001,  “Radical South African magazine relaunched,” Green Left Weekly, number 447.

pdflogosmallPDF is online here

Radical South African magazine relaunched

 Lucien van der Walt,Green Left Weekly 447.

JOHANNESBURG — The radical magazine, Debate: voices from the South African left, was recently relaunched at the Workers’ Library and Museum in Newtown, Johannesburg. The excellent turnout on March 23 demonstrated the potential for the revived journal to build links between community and worker activists and radical intellectuals. Read more of this post

[Analysis in TRANSLATION] Sian Byrne, Warren McGregor &Lucien van der Walt, 2011, “Γιατί η Πρωτομαγιά είναι σημαντική: Ιστορία με αναρχικές ρίζες”

Greek translation of Sian Byrne, Warren McGregor &Lucien van der Walt, 2011, “Why May Day Matters: History with anarchist roots,” South African Labour Bulletin,  Volume 35, Number 1, pp. 51-53 which you can read here.

Sian Byrne, Warren McGregor &Lucien van der Walt

“Γιατί η Πρωτομαγιά είναι σημαντική: Ιστορία με αναρχικές ρίζες”

Όταν γιορτάζουμε την Πρωτομαγιά σπάνιες φορές γνωρίζουμε ή καταλαβαίνουμε γιατί η μέρα αυτή είναι αργία στη Νότια Αφρική και σε πολλά μέρη του κόσμου. Οι Sian Byrne, Warren McGregor και Lucien van der Walt διηγούνται την ιστορία των δυναμικών αγώνων που βρίσκονται πίσω από την Πρωτομαγιά και των οργανώσεων που δημιούργησαν αλλά διατήρησαν τη σημασία της ζωντανή.

Αντιμέτωπο με τη νεοφιλελεύθερη παγκοσμιοποίηση, το πλατύ κίνημα της εργατικής τάξης αναγκάζεται να παγκοσμιοποιηθεί από τα κάτω. Ο διεθνισμός της εργατικής τάξης δεν είναι κάτι νέο. Πρέπει να διδαχθούμε από το παρελθόν. Read more of this post

Article [+ PDF] Sian Byrne, Warren McGregor &Lucien van der Walt, 2011, “Why May Day Matters: History with anarchist roots”

Sian Byrne, Warren McGregor &Lucien van der Walt, 2011, “Why May Day Matters: History with anarchist roots,” South African Labour Bulletin,  Volume 35, Number 1, pp. 51-53

pdflogosmallPDF is online here

Why May Day matters

History with anarchist roots

When we celebrate May Day we seldom know or reflect on why it is a holiday in South Africa and in many parts of the world. Sian Byrne, Warren McGregor and Lucien van der Walt tell the story of powerful struggles that lie behind its existence and of the organisations that both created it and kept its meaning alive.Faced with neo-liberal globalisation, the broad working class movement is being forced to globalise-from-below. Working class internationalism is nothing new; we need to learn from the past.

May Day or international workers day started as a global general strike to commemorate five anarchist labour organisers executed in the United States in 1887. Mounting the scaffold, August Spies declared: ‘if you think that by hanging us, you can stamp out the labor movement – the movement from which the downtrodden millions, the millions who toil and live in want and misery –the wage slaves – expect salvation – if this is your opinion, then hang us! Here you will tread upon a spark, but there, and there, and behind you and in front of you, and everywhere, flames will blaze up. It is a subterranean fire. You cannot put it out.’

Anarchists stressed the self-emancipation of the masses by building revolutionary counterpower. This meant mass organisations against the state as the basis for a new participatory democratic society. Syndicalism was one approach which entailed building revolutionary trade unions. Read more of this post

[Analysis in TRANSLATION] Lucien van der Walt, 2010, “Botta e risposta tra Spencer Sunshine e gli autori del libro “Black Flame” sulla rivista “Anarchist Studies””

This is an Italian translation of an exchange on “Black Flame” between Spencer Sunshine and Lucien van der Walt, in “Anarchist Studies” journal which you can read here.

Botta e risposta tra Spencer Sunshine e gli autori del libro “Black Flame” sulla rivista “Anarchist Studies”

Nel 2009 è uscito il primo dei due volumi del lavoro monumentale “Black Flame: the revolutionary class politics of anarchism and syndicalism” di Lucien van der Walt e Michael Schmidt (militanti comunisti anarchici sudafricani). Qui sotto una pedagogica polemica tra Lucien van del Walt e Spencer Sunshine, recensore del loro libro sulla rivista americana “Anarchist Studies”.

“Anarchist Studies”, che si definisce come “rivista interdisciplinare di ricerca sulla storia, cultura e teoria dell’anarchismo”, ha di recente pubblicato una recensione critica a cura di Spencer Sunshine avente come oggetto il libro di Lucien van der Walt e Michael Schmidt, intitolato Black Flame: the revolutionary class politics of anarchism and syndicalism. Ai 2 autori è stato concesso il diritto di replica.

In breve, la recensione di Sunshine loda Black Flame quale “miglior assemblaggio di ricerche sulle complesse relazioni tra anarchismo classico e questioni come il nazionalismo, l’imperialismo e la razza”, “mette in luce le ricche tradizioni sindacaliste dell’anarchismo in Asia, Africa, Europa orientale, America Latina e Caraibica” e “corregge quindi in modo cruciale l’eredità eurocentrica”. Tuttavia, egli sostiene pure che il libro fa “infuriare”, dal momento che esso è costruito su una definizione “del tutto inusuale” dell’anarchismo (cioè, l’anarchismo quale forma del socialismo libertario), cosa che porta all’esclusione di quelle (cosiddette) tradizioni “filosofica, individualista, spirituale e di ‘stile-di-vita’” (supposte quali “maggioritarie” nell’anarchismo contemporaneo).

Nella sua replica, lucien van der Walt fa notare che Sunshine non porta alcun argomento serio sufficiente a respingere le tesi centrali del libro: come quella con cui si sostiene che il movimento anarchico nella sua globalità emerge dalla Prima Internazionale, che il sindacalismo ne è parte integrante… che questa tradizione si incardina sul razionalismo, sul socialismo e sull’antiautoritarismo… come sugli scritti di Mikhail Bakunin e Pyotr Kropotkin… e che questa “angusta” definizione risulti tanto difendibile sul piano empirico quanto analiticamente utile. Nel presentare la visione dell’anarchismo contenuta nel libro quale “del tutto inusuale”, Sunshine finisce con l’etichettare allo stesso modo la visione che hanno dell’anarchismo una buona maggioranza di anarchici, di attivisti sindacali e di movimenti ritenuti così da Sunshine forme di anarchismo “del tutto inusuali” facendo ricorso ad una buona dose di retorica.

Qui sotto la recensione e la replica:

Read more of this post

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 45 other followers

%d bloggers like this: