Grizzly bear
Scientific classification
Kingdom:	Animalia
Phylum:	Chordata
Class:	Mammalia
Order:	Carnivora
Family:	Ursidae
Genus:	Ursus
Species:	U. arctos
Subspecies:	U. a. horribilis
Trinomial name
Ursus arctos horribilis (Ord, 1815)
Shrinking distribution during postglacial, historic and present time

The grizzly bear (Ursus arctos horribilis), also known as the silvertip bear, the grizzly, or the North American brown bear, is a subspecies of brown bear (Ursus arctos) that generally lives in the uplands of western North America. This subspecies is thought to descend from Ussuri brown bears which crossed to Alaska from eastern Russia 100,000 years ago, though they did not move south until 13,000 years ago.^[1]

Except for cubs and females,^[2] grizzlies are normally solitary, active animals, but in coastal areas, the grizzly congregates alongside streams, lakes, rivers, and ponds during the salmon spawn. Every other year, females (sows) produce one to four young (commonly two) which are small and weigh only about 500 grams (1 lb). A sow is protective of her offspring and will attack if she thinks she or her cubs are threatened.

Name[link]

The word "grizzly" in its name refers to "grizzled" or grey hairs in its fur, but when naturalist George Ord formally named the bear in 1815, he misunderstood the word as "grisly", to produce its biological Latin specific or subspecific name "horribilis".^[3]

Description[link]

Most adult female grizzlies weigh 130–200 kilograms (290–440 lb), while adult males weigh on average 180–360 kilograms (400–790 lb). The average total length in this subspecies is 198 centimetres (6.50 ft), with an average shoulder height of 102 centimetres (3.35 ft) and hindfoot length of 28 centimetres (11 in).^[4] Newborn bears may weigh less than 500 grams (1 lb). In the Yukon River area, mature female grizzlies can weigh as little as 100 kilograms (220 lb). On the other hand, an occasional huge male grizzly has been recorded which greatly exceeds ordinary size, with weights reported up to 680 kilograms (1,500 lb).^[5] Although variable from blond to nearly black, grizzly bear fur is typically brown in color with white tips.^[6] A pronounced hump appears on their shoulders; the hump is a good way to distinguish a black bear from a grizzly bear, as black bears do not have this hump.

Range[link]

Brown bears are found in Asia, Europe and North America giving them one of the widest ranges of bear species. The ancestors of the grizzly bear originated in Eurasia and travelled to North America approximately 50,000 years ago.^[7] This is a very recent event in evolutionary time, causing the North American grizzly bear to be very similar to the brown bears inhabiting Europe and Asia.

In North America, grizzly bears previously ranged from Alaska to Mexico and as far east as the Hudson Bay area.^[7] In North America, the species is now found only in Alaska, south through much of western Canada, and into portions of the northwestern United States including Idaho, Montana, Washington and Wyoming, extending as far south as Yellowstone and Grand Teton National Parks, but is most commonly found in Canada.

In September 2007, a hunter produced evidence of grizzly bears returning to the Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness ecosystem, in Idaho and western Montana, by killing a male grizzly bear.^[8]

Its original range also included much of the Great Plains and the southwestern states, but it has been extirpated in most of those areas.

The grizzly bear appears on the flag of California, though they are extinct in the state, the last one having been shot in 1922.^[9]

In Canada, there are approximately 25,000 grizzly bears occupying British Columbia, Alberta, the Yukon, the Northwest Territories, Nunavut and the northern part of Manitoba.^[7] Combining Canada and the United States, grizzly bears inhabit approximately half the area of their historical range.^[7] In British Columbia, grizzly bears inhabit approximately 90% of their original territory. There were approximately 25,000 grizzly bears in British Columbia when the European settlers arrived.^[7] However, population size significantly decreased due to hunting and habitat loss. In 2008, it was estimated there were 16,014 grizzly bears. Population estimates for British Columbia are based on hair-snagging, DNA-based inventories, mark-recapture and a refined multiple regression model.^[10]

Other provinces and the United States may use a combination of methods for population estimates. Therefore, it is difficult to say precisely what methods were used to produce total population estimates for Canada and North America, as they were likely developed from a variety of studies. The grizzly bear currently has legal protection in Mexico, European countries, some areas of Canada and in the United States. However, it is expected that repopulating its former range will be a slow process, due to a variety of reasons including the reintroduction of competing predators to these areas, the effects of reintroducing such a large animal to areas prized for agriculture and livestock, and due to the bear's slow reproductive habits. There are currently about 55,000 wild grizzly bears located throughout North America.^[7]

Brown bears (of which the grizzly bear is a subspecies) can live up to 30 years in the wild, though 20 to 25 is normal.^[11]

Reproduction[link]

Sow with two cubs

Grizzly bears have one of the lowest reproductive rates of all terrestrial mammals in North America.^[12] This is due to numerous ecological factors. Grizzly bears do not reach sexual maturity until they are at least five years old.^[7][13] Once mated with a male in the summer, the female delays embryo implantation until hibernation, during which miscarriage can occur if the female does not receive the proper nutrients and caloric intake.^[14] On average, females produce two cubs in a litter^[13] and the mother cares for the cubs for up to two years, during which the mother will not mate.^[7] Once the young leave or are killed, females may not produce another litter for three or more years, depending on environmental conditions.^[15] Male grizzly bears have large territories, up to 4,000 square kilometres (1,500 sq mi),^[12] making finding a female scent difficult in such low population densities.

Grizzlies are subject to population fragmentation, which tends to reduce the population by causing inbreeding depression.

Diet[link]

Grizzly Bear fishing for salmon at Brooks Falls, Alaska

A mother grizzly with a cub

Although grizzlies are of the order Carnivora and have the digestive system of carnivores, they are normally omnivores, since their diet consists of both plants and animals. They have been known to prey on large mammals, when available, such as moose, deer, sheep, elk, bison, caribou, and even black bears. Grizzly bears feed on fish such as salmon, trout, and bass, and those with access to a more protein-enriched diet in coastal areas potentially grow larger than interior individuals. Grizzly bears also readily scavenge food on carrion left behind by other animals.^[16]

Canadian or Alaskan grizzlies are larger than those that reside in the American Rocky Mountains. This is due, in part, to the richness of their diet. In Yellowstone National Park in the United States, the grizzly bear's diet consists mostly of whitebark pine nuts, tubers, grasses, various rodents, army cutworm moths and scavenged carcasses. None of these, however, match the fat content of the salmon available in Alaska and British Columbia.

Although the diet of grizzly bears varies extensively based on seasonal and regional changes, plants make up a large portion of their diet, with some estimates as high as 80–90%.^[17] Various berries constitute an important food source when they are available. These can include blueberries, blackberries (Rubus fruticosus), salmon berries (Rubus spectabilis), cranberries (Vaccinium oxycoccus), buffalo berries (Shepherdia argentea), and huckleberries (Vaccinium parvifolium), depending on the environment. Insects such as ladybugs, ants and bees are eaten if they are available in large quantities. In Yellowstone National Park, it has been observed that grizzly bears may obtain half of their yearly caloric needs by feeding on Miller moths that congregate on mountain slopes.^[18] When food is abundant, grizzly bears will feed in groups. For example, many grizzly bears will visit meadows right after there has been an avalanche or glacier slide. This is due to an influx of legumes, such as Hedysarum, which the grizzlies consume in massive amounts.^[19] When food sources become scarcer, however, they separate once again.

In preparation for winter, bears can gain approximately 400 lb (180 kg), during a period of hyperphagia, before going into false hibernation. The bear often waits for a substantial snowstorm before it enters its den: such behaviour lessens the chances that predators will find the den. The dens are typically at elevations above 1,800 metres (5,900 ft) on north-facing slopes. There is some debate amongst professionals as to whether grizzly bears technically hibernate: much of this debate revolves around body temperature and the ability of the bears to move around during hibernation on occasion. Grizzly bears can "partially" recycle their body wastes during this period. In some areas where food is plentiful year round, grizzly bears skip hibernation altogether.^{[citation needed]}

Interspecific competition[link]

grizzly bear cub in Western Canada

Most notable in Yellowstone have been the interactions between gray wolves and grizzly bears. With the reintroduction of gray wolves to Yellowstone, many visitors have witnessed a once common struggle between a keystone species, the grizzly bear, and its historic rival, the gray wolf. The interactions of U. arctos horribilis with the wolves of Yellowstone have been under considerable study. Typically, the conflict will be in the defense of young or over a carcass, which is commonly an elk killed by wolves.^[20] The grizzly bear uses its keen sense of smell to locate the kill. Then, the wolves and grizzly will play a game of cat and mouse. One wolf may try to distract the bear while the others feed. The bear then may retaliate by chasing the wolves. If the wolves become aggressive with the bear, it is normally in the form of quick nips at its hind legs. Thus, the bear will sit down and use its ability to protect itself in a full circle. Rarely do interactions such as these end in death or serious injury to either animal. One carcass simply is not usually worth the risk to the wolves (if the bear has the upper hand due to strength and size) or to the bear (if the wolves are too numerous or persistent).

Black bears generally stay out of grizzly territory, but grizzlies may occasionally enter black bear terrain to obtain food sources both bears enjoy, such as pine nuts, acorns, mushrooms, and berries. When a black bear sees a grizzly coming, it either turns tail and runs or climbs a tree. Black bears are not strong competition for prey because they have a more herbivorous diet. Confrontations are rare because of the difference in size, habitat, and diet of the bear species. When this happens, it is usually with the grizzly being the aggressor. The black bear will only fight when it is a smaller grizzly such as a yearling or when the black bear has no other choice but to defend itself.

The segregation of black bear and grizzly bear populations is possibly due to competitive exclusion. In certain areas, grizzly bears outcompete black bears for the same resources.^[21] For example, many Pacific coastal islands off British Columbia and Alaska support either the black bear or the grizzly, but rarely both.^[22] In regions where both species coexist, they are divided by landscape gradients such as age of forest, elevation and openness of land. Grizzly bears tend to favor old forests with high productivity, higher elevations and more open habitats compared with black bears.^[21]

The relationship between grizzly bears and other predators is mostly one-sided; grizzly bears will approach feeding predators to steal their kill. In general, the other species will leave the carcasses for the bear to avoid competition or predation. Any parts of the carcass left uneaten are scavenged by smaller animals.^[15] Cougars, however, generally give the bears a wide berth. Grizzlies have less competition with cougars than with other predators, such as coyotes, wolves, and other bears. When a grizzly descends on a cougar feeding on its kill, the cougar usually gives way to the bear. When a cougar does stand its ground, the cougar will use its superior agility and its claws to harass the bear, yet stay out of its reach until one of them gives up.

Coyotes, foxes, and wolverines are generally regarded as pests to the grizzlies rather than competition, though they may compete for smaller prey, such as ground squirrels and rabbits. All three will try to scavenge whatever they can from the bears. Wolverines are aggressive enough to occasionally persist until the bear finishes eating, leaving more than normal scraps for the smaller animal.^{[citation needed]}

Ecological role[link]

The grizzly bear has several relationships with its ecosystem. One such relationship is a mutualistic relationship with fleshy-fruit bearing plants. After the grizzly consumes the fruit, the seeds are dispersed and excreted in a germinable condition. Some studies have shown germination success is indeed increased as a result of seeds being deposited along with nutrients in feces.^[23] This makes grizzly bears important seed distributors in their habitats.^[24]

While foraging for tree roots, plant bulbs, or ground squirrels, bears stir up the soil. This process not only helps grizzlies access their food, but also increases species richness in alpine ecosystems.^[25] An area that contains both bear digs and undisturbed land has greater plant diversity than an area that contains just undisturbed land.^[25] Along with increasing species richness, soil disturbance causes nitrogen to be dug up from lower soil layers, and makes nitrogen more readily available in the environment.^[26] An area that has been dug by the grizzly bear has significantly more nitrogen than an undisturbed area.

Nitrogen cycling is not only facilitated by grizzlies digging for food, it is also accomplished via their habit of carrying salmon carcasses into surrounding forests.^[27] It has been found that spruce tree (Picea glauca) foliage within 500 m (1,600 ft) of the stream where the salmon have been obtained contains nitrogen originating from salmon on which the bears preyed.^[28] These nitrogen influxes to the forest are directly related to the presence of grizzly bears and salmon.^[29]

Grizzlies directly regulate prey populations and also help prevent overgrazing in forests by controlling the populations of other species in the food chain.^[30] An experiment in Grand Teton National Park in Wyoming in the United States showed removal of wolves and grizzly bears caused populations of their herbivorous prey to increase.^[31] This, in turn, changed the structure and density of plants in the area, which decreased the population sizes of migratory birds.^[31] This provides evidence grizzly bears represent a keystone predator, having a major influence on the entire ecosystem they inhabit.^[30]

Conflicts with humans[link]

Grizzlies are considered by some experts to be more aggressive than black bears when defending themselves and their offspring.^[32] Aggressive behavior in grizzly bears is favored by numerous selection variables. Unlike the smaller black bears, adult grizzlies are too large to escape danger by climbing trees, so they respond to danger by standing their ground and warding off their attackers. Increased aggressiveness also assists female grizzlies in better ensuring the survival of their young to reproductive age.^[33] Mothers defending their cubs are the most prone to attacking, being responsible for 70% of fatal injuries to humans.^[34] Historically, bears have competed with other large predators for food, which also favors increased aggression.

Campers are warned to hang food, garbage, and toiletries out of reach of bears, or to use a secure bear cache.

Grizzly bears normally avoid contact with people. In spite of their obvious physical advantages and many opportunities, they almost never view humans as prey; bears rarely actively hunt humans.^[35] Most grizzly bear attacks result from a bear that has been surprised at very close range, especially if it has a supply of food to protect, or female grizzlies protecting their offspring. In such situations, property may be damaged and the bear may physically harm the person.^[36]

Exacerbating this is the fact that intensive human use of grizzly habitat coincides with the seasonal movement of grizzly bears.^[36] An example of this spatiotemporal intersection occurs during the fall season: grizzly bears congregate near streams to feed on salmon when anglers are also intensively using the river. Some grizzly bears appear to have learned to hone in on the sound of hunters' gunshots in late fall as a source of potential food, and inattentive hunters have been attacked by bears trying to appropriate their kills.^{[citation needed]}

Increased human–bear interaction has created "problem bears", which are bears that have become adapted to human activities or habitat.^[37] Aversive conditioning, a method involving using deterrents such as rubber bullets, foul-tasting chemicals or acoustic devices to teach bears to associate humans with negative experiences, is ineffectual when bears have already learned to positively associate humans with food.^[38] Such bears are translocated or killed because they pose a threat to humans. The B.C. government kills approximately 50 problem bears each year^[38] and overall spends more than one million dollars annually to address bear complaints, relocate bears and kill them.^[38]

For back-country campers, hanging food between trees at a height unreachable to bears is a common procedure, although some grizzlies can climb and reach hanging food in other ways. An alternative to hanging food is to use a bear canister.^[39]

Traveling in groups of six or more can significantly reduce the chance of bear-related injuries while hiking in bear country.^[40]

Protection[link]

A grizzly in Denali National Park

A grizzly bear in Bear Country USA, Rapid City, South Dakota.

The grizzly bear is listed as threatened in the contiguous United States and endangered in parts of Canada. In May 2002, the Canadian Species at Risk Act listed the Prairie population (Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba range) of grizzly bears as being wiped out in Canada.^[41] As of 2002, grizzly bears were listed as Special Concern under the COSEWIC registry^[42] and considered threatened under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.^[43]

Within the United States, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service concentrates its effort to restore grizzly bears in six recovery areas. These are Northern Continental Divide (Montana), Yellowstone (Montana, Wyoming, and Idaho), Cabinet-Yaak (Montana and Idaho), Selway-Bitterroot (Montana and Idaho), Selkirk (Idaho and Washington), and North Cascades (Washington). The grizzly population in these areas is estimated at 750 in the Northern Continental Divide, 550 in Yellowstone, 40 in the Yaak portion of the Cabinet-Yaak, and 15 in the Cabinet portion (in northwestern Montana), 105 in Selkirk region of Idaho, 10–20 in the North Cascades, and none currently in Selway-Bitterroots, although there have been sightings.^[44] These are estimates because bears move in and out of these areas, and it is therefore impossible to conduct a precise count. In the recovery areas that adjoin Canada, bears also move back and forth across the international boundary.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service claims the Cabinet-Yaak and Selkirk areas are linked through British Columbia, a claim that is disputed.^[45]

All national parks, such as Banff National Park, Yellowstone and Grand Teton, and Theodore Roosevelt National Park have laws and regulations in place to protect the bears. Even so, grizzlies are not always safe in parks. In Glacier National Park in Montana and Banff National Park in Alberta, grizzlies are regularly killed by trains as the bears scavenge for grain that has leaked from poorly maintained grain cars. Road kills on park roads are another problem. The primary limiting factors for grizzly bears in Alberta and elsewhere are human-caused mortality, unmitigated road access, and habitat loss, alienation, and fragmentation. In the Central Rocky Mountains Ecosystem, most bears have died within a few hundred meters of roads and trails.^[46]

On 9 January 2006, the US Fish and Wildlife Service proposed to remove Yellowstone grizzlies from the list of threatened and protected species.^[47] In March 2007, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service "de-listed" the population,^[48] effectively removing Endangered Species Act protections for grizzlies in the Yellowstone National Park area. Several environmental organizations, including the NRDC, brought a lawsuit against the federal government to relist the grizzly bear. On September 22, 2009, U.S. District Judge Donald W. Molloy reinstated protection due to the decline of whitebark pine tree, whose nuts are a main source of food for the bears.^[49] In 1996 the International Union for Conservation of Nature moved the grizzly bear to "Lower Risk Least Concern" status on the IUCN Red List.^[50][51]

Farther north, in Alberta, Canada, intense DNA hair-snagging studies on 2000 showed the grizzly population to be increasing faster than what it was formerly believed to be, and Alberta Sustainable Resource Development calculated a population of 841 bears.^[46] In 2002, the Endangered Species Conservation Committee recommended that the Alberta grizzly bear population be designated as threatened due to recent estimates of grizzly bear mortality rates that indicated the population was in decline. A recovery plan released by the Provincial government in March 2008 indicated the grizzly population is lower than previously believed.^[52] The Provincial government has so far resisted efforts to designate its declining population of about 700 grizzlies (previously estimated at as high as 842) as endangered.^{[citation needed]}

Environment Canada consider the grizzly bear to a "special concern" species, as it is particularly sensitive to human activities and natural threats. In Alberta and British Columbia, the species is considered to be at risk.^[53] In 2008, it was estimated there were 16,014 grizzly bears in the British Columbia population, which was lower than previously estimated due to refinements in the population model.^[54]

The Mexican grizzly bear (Ursus arctos nelsoni) is extinct.^[55]

Conservation efforts[link]

A drum or barrel trap used to safely relocate bears adjacent to a building in Grand Teton National Park in Wyoming, United States

Conservation efforts have become an increasingly vital investment over recent decades, as population numbers have dramatically declined. Establishment of parks and protected areas are one of the main focuses currently being tackled to help reestablish the low grizzly bear population in British Columbia. One example of these efforts is the Khutzeymateen Grizzly Bear Sanctuary located along the north coast of British Columbia; at 44,300 hectares (109,000 acres) in size, it is composed of key habitat for this threatened species. Regulations such as limited public access, as well as a strict no hunting policy, have enabled this location to be a safe haven for local grizzlies in the area.^[56] When choosing the location of a park focused on grizzly bear conservation, factors such as habitat quality and connectivity to other habitat patches are considered.

The Refuge for Endangered Wildlife located on Grouse Mountain in Vancouver is an example of a different type of conservation effort for the diminishing grizzly bear population. The refuge is a five-acre terrain which has functioned as a home for two orphaned grizzly bears since 2001.^[57] The purpose of this refuge is to provide awareness and education to the public about grizzly bears, as well as providing an area for research and observation of this secluded species.

Another factor currently being taken into consideration when designing conservation plans for future generations are anthropogenic barriers in the form of urban development and roads. These elements are acting as obstacles, causing fragmentation of the remaining grizzly bear population habitat and prevention of gene flow between subpopulations (for example, Banff National Park). This, in turn, is creating a decline in genetic diversity, and therefore the overall fitness of the general population is lowered.^[58] In light of these issues, conservation plans often include migration corridors by way of long strips of "park forest" to connect less developed areas, or by way of tunnels and overpasses over busy roads.^[59] Using GPS collar tracking, scientists can study whether or not these efforts are actually making a positive contribution towards resolving the problem.^[60] To date, most corridors are found to be infrequently used, and thus genetic isolation is currently occurring, which can result in inbreeding and therefore an increased frequency of deleterious genes through genetic drift.^[61] Current data suggest female grizzly bears are disproportionately less likely than males to use these corridors, which can prevent mate access and decrease the number of offspring.

Hunting[link]

Trophy hunting causes an imbalance between the male and female sexes, since older males are primarily sought to be hunted for their size.^[30] The hunting of older males creates a gender imbalance within an area specific population.^[62] The killing of older male bears in their own territory allows other males to migrate in and claim the late bear's territory. Older male bears will have had cubs with existing female bears in the region. This may cause the newly migrated male bear to become potentially infanticidal towards cubs of the resident females and the late male bear.^[58]

See also[link]

• Brown bear
• Grizzly–polar bear hybrid
• Grizzly Peak (Berkeley Hills)
• List of fatal bear attacks in North America
• Hunting status on grizzly bears in British Columbia, Canada

Notes[link]

References[link]

• "Ursus arctos horribilis". Integrated Taxonomic Information System. http://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=202385. Retrieved 18 March 2006. 
• Banfield, A. W. F. (1987), The Mammals of Canada, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, ISBN [[Special:BookSources/0-8020-9229-8|0-8020-9229-8]] 
• CBC News article on possible "grolar bear" (Polar Bear/Grizzly Bear hybrid)
• Committee On The Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) Assessment and Update Status Report on the Grizzly Bear (Ursus arctos) in Canada, 2002 2.1 MB PDF file.
• Cronin, M. A.; et al. (1991), "Interspecific and specific mitochondrial DNA variation in North American bears (Ursus)", Canadian Journal of Zoology 69: 2985–2992, DOI:10.1139/z91-421 
• Herrero, Stephen (1985), Bear Attacks, Piscataway, NJ: New Centuries Publishers, ISBN 0-8329-0377-9 
• Waits, L. P.; et al. (1998), "Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of the North American brown bear and implications for conservation", Conservation Biology 12: 408–417, DOI:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96351.x 
• Snyder, Susan (2003), The California Grizzly Bear in Mind, Berkeley: University of California Press 
• Berger, J.; Stacey, Peter B; Bellis, Lori; Johnson, Matthew P (2001), "A Mammalian Predator-Prey Imbalance: Grizzly Bear and Wolf Extinction Affect Avian Neotropical Migrants", Ecological Applications 11 (4): 947–960, DOI:10.2307/3061004, JSTOR 3061004 
• Mattson, J.; Merrill, Troy (2001), "Extirpations of Grizzly Bears in the Contiguous United States, 1850–2000", Conservation Biology 16 (4): 1123–1136, DOI:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00414.x 
• Wielgus, R. B. (2002), "Minimum viable population and reserve sizes for naturally regulated grizzly bears in British Columbia", Biological Conservation 106: 381–388, DOI:10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00265-8 
• Tardiff, S. E.; Stanford, J. (1998), "Grizzly Bear Digging: Effects on Subalpine Meadow Plants in Relation to Mineral Nitrogen Availability", Ecology 79 (7): 2219–2228, DOI:10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2219:GBDEOS]2.0.CO;2 
• Groom, M. J.; Meffe, G. K.; Carroll, C. R. (2006), Principles of Conservation Biology (3rd ed.), Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates 
• Murie, Adolph (1985), The grizzlies of Mount McKinley, Seattle: University of Washington Press, ISBN 0-295-96204-6 
• Knibb, David (2008), Grizzly Wars: The Public Fight Over the Great Bear, Eastern Washington University Press, ISBN 978-1-59766-037-2 
• Peek, J., Beecham, J., Garshelis, D., Messier, F., Miller, S., & Dale, S. 2003. Management of Grizzly Bears in British Columbia: A Review by and Independent Scientific Panel. Retrieved on October 28, 2009 from http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/wld/documents/gbear_finalspr.pdf.
• Michael, F.P., Bruce, N.M., & Curtis S. 2002. Population Fragmentation of Grizzly Bears in Southeastern British Columbia, Canada. Ursus, 8: 153–160. Retrieved on October 26, 2009 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3873196.
• McCory, W.P., Herrero, S.M., Jones, G.W., & Mallam, E.D. 1990. A Selection of Papers from the Eighth International Conference on Bear Research and Management, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. Bears: Their Biology and Management, 8: 11–16.
• Krebs, C.J. 2009. Ecology: The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance. Benjamin Cummings, San Francisco.
• Miller, S.D. 1990. Impact of increased bear hunting on survivorship of young bears. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 18: 462–467. Retrieved on October 27, 2009 from http://www.jstor.org/pss/3782749.
• Proctor, M.F., McLellan, B.N., Strobeck, C., & Barclay, R.M.R. 2005. Genetic analysis reveals demographic fragmentation of grizzly bears yielding vulnerably small populations. Proc Biol Sci., 272: 2409–2416. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3246.

External links[link]

Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Ursus arctos horribilis

Wikispecies has information related to: Ursus arctos horribilis

• Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History species account-Grizzly Bear
• Are Grizzly Bears Dangerous?, grizzlybay.org
• Bear-ly with us: Is the fight to save Alberta's great Bear is a test case for protecting other endangered species in the province?
• Grizzly Bears in the Canadian Rockies
• The Yellowstone Grizzly