politics.co.uk

Sketch: Ed Miliband's dazed triumph

Sat Sep 25 07:48PM

The Labour party dragged out its leadership election result far longer than necessary, but it didn't matter. Ed Miliband's numbed gaping was worth the wait.

By Alex Stevenson

This was the culmination of one man's career, and the end of another's. The drama was scintillatingly intense as the results were slowly revealed. At the end of each round - which finished with Ed Miliband's results, critically - the tension increased another notch. Far from being decisive, each new round of preferential voting seemed to cut the margin again and again. The exhalations became shorter and shorter as the climax approached. "Ahhs" were joined by "jeez!" and high-pitched "ooohs!" from excitable females. The deeply unglamorous chair of Labour's national executive committee ploughed on through the numbers, which only became decisive with David Miliband's fourth-round total of 49.35%. At first only sections of the hall rose to cheer the result. Eventually, coming to their senses after their shock had worn off, so did the entire party.

The victor, the new leader of the opposition, the man repeatedly hailed as the "next prime minister", did not collapse into a fit of hysterics, as reality TV stars tend to. He is a well-trained politician so he opted for the alternative X Factor response. He was shocked and stunned. He was terribly emotional. It was what the TV audience wanted, but not the hall.

If the Ed Miliband biopic is ever made (and after today, who knows what's possible?) they must film this scene in the first person, the applause and cheering muffled, like they do in war movies after big explosions. Bombshells are frequently used by politicians when referring to policies of the other parties. Ed Miliband looked as if one of them had finally blown up next to him.

And so, in Ed: The Movie, Ed Miliband will be unhearing as his brother David (who, it turns out, really was sitting next to him), hugs him and ruffles his hair. This must have seemed all too real to David, whose dreams of leadership have come unstuck in the most overwhelmingly personal fashion. Perhaps it is the sudden devaluation in his political importance which made me notice for the first time, but as I stared at the back of his head I couldn't help thinking: you've got rather big ears, haven't you?

Meanwhile, back in the triumph scene which draws act one to a close, Ed Miliband was advancing past his vanquished foes to the stage. Assuming he becomes a national war hero the editors may wish to adjust the look on his face to something more bold, more convincing, than the unfortunate truth.

A stuffed trout would have seemed more animated as Ed Miliband gawped out at his newfound followers. He tottered on to the stage, looking utterly stumped by what to do next. The applause died away as his newfound followers waited for him to speak. He stared out. Was he savouring the moment? Or was he about to expire? An audience member laughed awkwardly. Finally, the new Labour leader spoke up.

"Never in my wildest imagination did I ever dream... I would lead this party," he said. If the movie never gets made, he has the consolation of this reality TV fest to replay. On The X Factor the winner's song is always slightly teary, never quite on key. So it was with Ed Miliband's speech. He told Britain "I get it" and the party that "a new generation has taken charge of Labour" on autopilot, as the most important truth - he had bested his elder sibling - continued to swirl and swirl around. The candidates may have sneered at soap-opera politics. But when a leadership candidate says to another, "David, I love you so much as a brother," what else is it?

Comments1 - 10 of 502

  1. Well, that's Labour condemned to years of opposition. Ed Milliband is too much in the Unions, pocket to ever attract middle England's vote, and that's what they'll have to do to get back into power. It's no good Ed saying they need to get the working class vote back - that's not enough to get them power again. Cameron must be clapping his hands with glee at this result. And as for unifying the Parliamentary Party - I doubt it - most MPs wanted David to win and he would have been a far wiser choice electorially. And of course - Ed has been supported by Kinnock - if that's not the kiss of death nothing is! Oh well...............................

    bill.phipps From bill.phipps on Sat Sep 25 07:57PM

    Report abuse

  2. Too appalled at this totally ignorant, anti-Labour, inaccurate, despicable, diatribe, to want to say anything other than that. No doubt this type of article is just what the Daily Mail needs for its front page. Pathetic.

    gbuck From gbuck on Sat Sep 25 07:59PM

    Report abuse

  3. what a poor report. It proves that the talentless become critics, and this report is the most talentless yet. Next time dont try to be funny by being flippant try and understand that it is not about you. It is serious stuff!

    glyn.goodchild From glyn.goodchild on Sat Sep 25 08:04PM

    Report abuse

  4. How can Labour hope to win an election if they elect Mr Bean as their leader?

    n.wood615 From n.wood615 on Sat Sep 25 08:04PM

    Report abuse

  5. Great news this!Labour out for 20yrs lets party!

    graham.g.white From graham.g.white on Sat Sep 25 08:15PM

    Report abuse

  6. The person who took Ed. Miliband's photo must have been a Conservative supporter in the Media Industry, he manipulated the Camera and twisted Miliband's face to the Left. I still need to know the motive of doing that.

    wodgot From wodgot on Sat Sep 25 08:20PM

    Report abuse

  7. As a true blue Tory - I am delighted. I was worried David Milliband would be the new leader.

    jamesburrow333 From jamesburrow333 on Sat Sep 25 08:22PM

    Report abuse

  8. from iscott244 it is a pity none of them had the guts to stand up to broon and save labour loosing the election, to late to start crowing now

    ianscott244 From ianscott244 on Sat Sep 25 08:23PM

    Report abuse

  9. I'm afraid I must admit I only stumbled on this article due to boredom and as a (self described) member of the normal British public all I got from this article was the vague attempt of a coloumnist attemting to rip the piss out of someone that I, and ninety nine percent of the people I know, have no idea how to tell apart from his brother, or any other candidate for the leadership for that matter. On the whole does it even matter who the leader of the Labour party is when, unless there is some seriously chronic problems, none of us would even be able to vote into power for the next five years anyway, by which time he may not even be leader any more?

    aaronjohnson84 From aaronjohnson84 on Sat Sep 25 08:25PM

    Report abuse

  10. At the risk of being called everything under the sun, it appears the Labour party is exactly in the same position it was prior to the election - with one difference a new face fronts it. I wonder how Tweedle Dum will do without Tweedle Dee, or will the brother become deputy.......there goes the Mad Hatter, sorry must rush as it is getting late, very late.

    dgmholter From dgmholter on Sat Sep 25 08:32PM

    Report abuse

Comment on this article

Please sign in to add your comments.


Add to my Yahoo/RSS

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! All rights reserved.

Notice: We collect personal information on this site. To learn more about how we use your information, see our: Updated Privacy Policy