×
all 165 comments

[–]ImRonSwansonBurgundy 490 points491 points  (97 children)

This is the best named thread I've ever seen. Thanks for all you do, guys.

[–]dharasick🍤⌚ 2012 AC Top 10, 2013 AC Top 5, 2021 Cmltv Top 10[M] 123 points124 points  (76 children)

[–]812many -231 points-230 points  (75 children)

It looks like I might be in the minority here, but I completely disagree, I don't like this at all. I know it's a pun, but it's a pun on some annoying sexist crap that goes on all over reddit. Normally I would have skipped over content titled like this, but since this is a mod post I want to wade in and read it, and the title annoys the shit out of me and is distracting from the content.

Edit: well, I was right about having a minority opinion here. Carry on.

Edit 2: my point is that this is the type of stuff I like to avoid on reddit. I don't downvote it and I know a lot of people like it, but it's something I don't like to participate in. Because this is a modpost, and I like this subreddit about fantasy football, I am forced to deal with it, and that's what I don't like.

[–]TacticalOyster 73 points74 points  (6 children)

Who pissed in your cheerios?

[–]clippinc 3 points4 points  (3 children)

Hey Dylan

[–]TacticalOyster 2 points3 points  (2 children)

How ya doin Clippinc?

[–]clippinc 4 points5 points  (1 child)

I'm doing great man. Haven't seen you in forever

[–]TacticalOyster 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I know it's been almost 5 hours

[–]FantasyYHWH 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Wait... how is it sexist? I never got the rustled jimmies over this. You do know this is how you were conceived right?

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

[–]Decker87 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Well I hope you've learned your lesson about voicing unpopular opinions.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[removed]

    [–]DunkMasterZ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

    I would just like to say that I am a liberal arts student and I find the pun to be pretty funny. Not all of us are so eager to be upset at something all the time.

    [–]Suboptimus 4 points5 points  (0 children)

    It's a sexual joke not a sexist joke. If the idea of sex is something you have to "deal with" perhaps we are not the problem.

    [–]jstyer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    I agree with you.

    [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

    2mature4me

    [–]Tacotuesdayftw 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    No one is downvoting your opinion. They are downvoting you because you think the fuck her right in the pussy joke is sexist.

    [–]TheDudeNeverBowls 2 points3 points  (11 children)

    I agree with you completely, buddy. I'll admit that I clicked on it because it was sexist. I didn't know it was a mod post. I thought it would be a sexist joke thread. I was shocked to see it was a serious mod post.

    [–]mookiemookie[M] 0 points1 point  (10 children)

    Except that it isn't sexist in the least.

    [–]TheDudeNeverBowls 0 points1 point  (9 children)

    No, the post is not sexist, but you have to be able to admit to yourself that the title is even at the least remotely sexist even in some minor way to only the most sensitive of people???

    Edit: seriously, a play on words sounding like 'fuck her in the pussy' is not considered a little sexist to you? Am I in the bizarro world?

    [–]mookiemookie 2 points3 points  (8 children)

    No, the title is not remotely sexist. It's a pun based on slang terms for normal, biological heterosexual sex. It has nothing to do with rape, diminishing the role of women, male patriarchy or sexual oppression.

    [–]TheDudeNeverBowls -2 points-1 points  (7 children)

    OK, buddy. I'm glad to know that 'pussy' isn't in any way derogatory anymore. And here I've been wasting my time using the word vagina.

    For now on, it's all pussy all the time.

    [–]mookiemookie 1 point2 points  (5 children)

    It's no more derogatory than cock, shit, fuck, ass, or any other scatological slang term for a body part or function is.

    [–]TheDudeNeverBowls -3 points-2 points  (4 children)

    So those terms should be used in the title of official serious mod posts? OK, noted.

    [–]JoshGarden -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

    This is the fantasy football sub, not /r/TwoXChromosomes. If you can't handle a pun, GTFO and don't come back.

    [–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    Far from sexist.

    Forced to deal with it? The unsubscribe button is just to the right side of the screen. Problem solved.

    [–]likewhatalready 4 points5 points  (27 children)

    (you're right)

    [–]Canesjags4life 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Cool Story. How about next time you just skip over it then.

    [–]NM05 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I'll go ahead and say that I agree completely with ya.

    [–][deleted] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

    Made you read what they wanted you to read, amairite?

    [–]taterred 22 points23 points  (13 children)

    Dude in my league named his team "Luck her right in the Percy".

    [–]Emily_Says 56 points57 points  (7 children)

    As long as he doesn't Forsett

    [–]DHobbs21 3 points4 points  (6 children)

    I just busted up laughing so hard the guy in the office next to me came to ask what's so funny and I couldn't tell him

    [–]mccorklin 4 points5 points  (4 children)

    Why does he not watch football?

    [–]DHobbs21 2 points3 points  (3 children)

    He'd love the joke. Just to inappropriate to repeat out loud

    [–]VIRMDFantasyBro 7 points8 points  (1 child)

    Sounds like he needs to clean his vagina and get with the program...

    [–]ItchyIrishBalls 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    This man knows the program.

    [–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (4 children)

    Hah, same with my league. Unless we're in the same league?!

    [–]taterred 0 points1 point  (3 children)

    possibly... what's the name of your team?

    [–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (2 children)

    Golden Calvin Bush

    Go lions :)

    [–]taterred -1 points0 points  (1 child)

    we're in different leagues :P

    [–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

    Aww man. I was really hoping I just found one of my friends on reddit. Have a good one dude.

    [–]Marcurial 10 points11 points  (0 children)

    Some times the mods slip up with makings discussion threads and such, but Field Goal upvotes and this make up for it

    [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Absolutely!

    [–]xEphr0m 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    ITT: Vaginas hurt

    [–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

    [–]mythofdob 73 points74 points  (0 children)

    Thank you guys for the post. Hardest working bunch of mods on reddit. I love browsing on a Sunday and seeing all the shit posts deleted.

    That said, the people that post reactionary shit probably won't read this post and will keep doing it.

    Anyways, keep up the good work.

    [–]EasyCheezie 51 points52 points  (0 children)

    Jameis confirmed as a mod

    [–]StigasaurusRex 11 points12 points  (7 children)

    On another note, can we get an official injury thread on Sunday? I don't think it would be too hard. If you're watching a game and see an injury occur, check the main text (which could be kept updated by the original poster or perhaps the automoderator?). If it's not there just post it as a comment. At least this way, we can ctrl+f to look for players.

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–]clutchmasterflex 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      Agreed.

      Injury updates = important and should be easily visible under the New section.

      [–]TheProfessorXI miss Scoot. 8 points9 points  (3 children)

      Can we get

      Why don't you try creating one yourself? We like to watch football too.

      [–]StigasaurusRex 0 points1 point  (2 children)

      haha, point taken. I would be happy to give it a go, and I think it would be cool as long as people checked the main text first, before posting a new injury.

      I know nothing of your automoderator ways, but it seems like you have implemented a pretty nifty posts-answered tracker in the daily threads. Would it be tremendously difficult to scrape the comments for new injuries an update the main text?

      [–]TheProfessorXI miss Scoot. 1 point2 points  (1 child)

      I'll let /u/tonyg623, our FFBot Curator, answer that question for you at his leisure.

      [–]StigasaurusRex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Bitchin' thanks!

      [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      I do an official injury thread every week, but doing it on Sunday is asking too much. I manage five fantasy teams, and I RedZone (and drink) my ass off from sun up to sun down on gameday.

      I can start posting it on Mondays, I suppose. But /u/fakebaseball already does his Waiver Wire + AMA, so having my Report + AMA seems redundant.

      [–]loki777coyg 10 points11 points  (1 child)

      Clicked this because of the title, then got slammed with knowledge. If only school could trick me like this.

      [–]sscspagftphbpdh17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Did you never watch School House Rock? Conjunction Junction, what's your function? Hooking up words and phrases and clauses!

      [–]waffels 19 points20 points  (13 children)

      Am I a terrible subreddit member for downvoting all the "I need 2 more points from so and so this game!" "I have so and so and my opponent has this defense, lets hope my player does well!" posts in the game threads? 90% of the posts in the game threads are these and I have to believe nobody reads or gives a shit about someone else's fantasy team. What the hell possesses someone to post this shit?

      [–]mookiemookie 27 points28 points  (0 children)

      Terrible subreddit member? You've just zoomed to the top of the moderator candidate list.

      [–]paradoxally 12 points13 points  (8 children)

      Game threads are meant for those kinds of posts. That is why they should be IN the game threads and not out of them (unlike the bad examples above).

      If you want game discussion, there is /r/nfl which has game threads for each game sans fantasy woes.

      [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (7 children)

      Ideally those posts shouldnt happen at all. What should actually occur is a discussion of the players' performances and how it relates to their future value (ex., "Adams is being used in the slot more today, will this be a more common occurrence going forward or is it related to the score/a defender covering Nelson/the Lions stacking the box/etc.").

      (Yeah the example is nonsensical and pulled out of my ass but I think it illustrates what im driving at, about what kind of posts are ideal in game threads, which I admittedly almost never bother to read or participate in)

      [–]FirstAndForever 2 points3 points  (2 children)

      If stuff like that was being posted in game threads, that would be awesome. I stay out of the game threads because I can't handle the 'my WR scored! Can I get some upboats?!'

      [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      Yep, that's why I don't bother to be a part of them (as well as because this season especially, I've been watching the games with others and it would be a bit odd to be active in game threads instead of just conversing with my buds about what's going on). If there happens to be a Sunday in which I end up watching the games by myself I'll try to post intelligently in the threads, but I doubt it will make much headway if I do.

      [–]FirstAndForever 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      I'll try to do the same. We'll be the intellectual trendsetters of the subreddit.

      [–]paradoxally 1 point2 points  (2 children)

      The problem is the game flow is too fast for lengthy discussions.

      [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

      I disagree, I just think shitposting is low effort and lazy, which is encouraged under the conditions you described. However, with ads and time between plays, comments like my example are certainly possible and on a more common basis. It's just that, as my first sentence says, people are more prone to lazy, low-value posts.

      [–]paradoxally 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      I personally don't mind people wishing for more points for their team because often times I have the same players on my roster too/are playing against those players. They aren't too high-value, but during the games I prefer fast content because the game itself is more important.

      [–]shadoire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Do you think Adams is worth picking up? 12 team standard yahoo. Thx

      [–]thedroogabides 1 point2 points  (1 child)

      The game threads are awful and should just be avoided. It's nothing but what you mentioned and people swearing at their fantasy football players.

      [–]joe-movie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      As someone who doesn't have anyone that's into football or fantasy or commiserate with, the game threads are a place I like to voice my opinion. Is there some else that's better for this (reddit or otherwise)?

      [–]quitelargeballs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      What we really need is big, bold, red text at the top of every 'Submit New Post' page: "NO-ONE CARES ABOUT YOUR PERSONAL FANTASY TEAM. NO-ONE BUT YOU."

      [–]ihatecats18 4 points5 points  (1 child)

      Jameis Approves

      [–]adm7373 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      What's all this Jameies business?

      [–]Marcurial 1 point2 points  (1 child)

      Are we allowed to post player discussion threads during games or will those be removed too?

      [–]dharasick🍤⌚ 2012 AC Top 10, 2013 AC Top 5, 2021 Cmltv Top 10 5 points6 points  (0 children)

      Probably best to wait until the game is over, no?

      [–]bigbird249 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      Can we get the crowdsourcing rankings website on the sidebar as long as we are talking about improvements? I'd like to start seeing this daily before this sub forgets about and I'd also like to easily vote in my spare time.

      [–]paradoxally 1 point2 points  (1 child)

      I'm still waiting for the massive amounts of people who will circlejerk to Josh Gordon in week 12+ when he scores his first touchdown (and not having read this post).

      [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

      I'm going to be guilty.

      [–]Petrarch1603 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      As long as Quickonthedrawal continues his weekly picks, I'm content.

      [–]supplyncommand 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      RIP upvote parties

      [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

      I rarely see these nice pun titles. Dem Party on Facebook had Shutdown for What a couple of weeks ago, but such gems rarely come up. Upvotes for originality, and thanks again for the hard work.

      [–]LumaDaylight 3 points4 points  (1 child)

      Please please please also include something about how people post on injury threads. Like for aj green. "Aj green turf toe" post: "who do I start?" "Should I trade him for xxx?"

      Those are extremely annoying and get down voted, but I think it should be mentioned too.

      Thanks guys! (And possibly gals)

      [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

      Sooo you didn't read the post...

      Edit: I didn't read your comment. lol. Irony.

      [–]phesto604 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      prostate specific antigen?

      [–]DHobbs21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Such a good title. Nobody would read it if it just said. PSA about game threads.

      [–]keebler980 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      I submitted this thread about what commissioners can do to make their league better at the beginning of the season, and it seemed to do well. It wasn't a help thread, just a general "make your league more interesting". I posted a follow up that was removed but was told the thread was only for me, and should post in the commish help thread. But the commish help thread is only for problems. My question isn't a help me thread, but more a general improvement that I and other commishes check back on. Why was it blocked the second time? If it's posted in the "help" thread, it won't get seen.

      [–]oxymor0nic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      awesome title. and supremely good work!

      [–]appslap 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Wow thank you. I doubt everyone will abide by this but much appreciated to you guys for keeping it cleaner.

      [–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      Awesome. Thanks for the hard work guys. Great pun title too!

      [–]xSGAx -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      Best. title. ever.

      [–]Mannbearpiggg -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      Thank you for this post! There has been so much crap filtering through that adds no value and is just circle jerk material. Hopefully this helps to eliminate a lot of that crap. Thanks for all you guys do

      [–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      NFL Team Flair There is no proof that being a fan of a certain team leads to more accurate advice. If anything, fandom would cause bias in advice.

      Is there any proof that it doesn't? You can't use a lack of proof as justification, especially when intuitively you would think that it would. I can assure you that when a Bills player is concerned, my analysis will involve much more thought than a random users. If anything, exposing that my bias helps people weigh the pros and cons of listening to a fan when deciding whether to take my advice.

      [–]shamy33 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      Amazing.

      [–]raweber -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      Thank you for the good heads up, im new here so im still learning what's right and wrong

      [–][deleted]  (2 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]GATTACABear -2 points-1 points  (2 children)

        What would help is getting the game threads out on time, maybe even early? The morning game was 20 minutes late this week. Supposedly there are bots that do this...maybe set them to the correct time? Seems to be a problem every week.

        [–]dharasick🍤⌚ 2012 AC Top 10, 2013 AC Top 5, 2021 Cmltv Top 10 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        The bot is programmed to post 15 minutes before game time. I had a brain fart and forgot to program one for the London Game.

        [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

        20 minutes shouldn't be a big deal. Realize that moderators are not paid and have lives outside of reddit

        [–]asthepalacesburnn -18 points-17 points  (24 children)

        So yesterday I submitted a post, the title was Let's discuss Eric Decker.. In the post I wasn't asking anything WDIS specific, and basically just wanted to get opinions from other people about his role in the offense and whether or not he's worth dropping or holding onto at this point. The post got deleted.. Why? Just curious. I thought I went about it the correct way.

        [–]quickonthedrawlFantasyBro & 2012 Accuracy Challenge - Top 10 Cumulative 27 points28 points  (2 children)

        Here's a suggestion: Spend 20-30 minutes and do the legwork! Dig up some stats. Put a few minutes into the post and see if you can spark discussion, rather than see if you can entice other people to discuss it. I think you'd find you end up with a higher quality discussion and won't have your post deleted!

        [–]asthepalacesburnn 4 points5 points  (1 child)

        Thanks for the info. Granted I didn't include much in my post besides a paragraph or two, but I've seen shorter posts about players who've been talked about all day long that don't get deleted.

        [–]quickonthedrawlFantasyBro & 2012 Accuracy Challenge - Top 10 Cumulative 4 points5 points  (0 children)

        Yep, sometimes when dozens of "discussion" threads all get posted, some of them gain traction due to the comments. Usually though, they end up with a bunch of "CHOO CHOO!" type comments or silly jokes. If you want a really good discussion to happen, I guarantee you you'll have a better result if you grab some stats.

        And I don't just mean the widely available stuff, though that's good too. After all, we can all go to ESPN's scoring leaders and figure out how many points per game Decker scored. But what about:

        1. How many targets per game he's gotten.

        2. Points per target

        3. TD % compared to other WR1s

        4. ROS matchup stats

        Etc.

        In about 15 minutes, I could pull up all four of those and write something that actually makes people want to discuss the question rather than just throwing in silly anecdotes or "But would you start him or Edelman this week" kind of stuff.

        Reddit is a medium where you get what you put in.

        [–]mookiemookie 7 points8 points  (0 children)

        So yesterday I submitted a post, the title was Let's discuss Eric Decker.. In the post I wasn't asking anything WDIS specific, and basically just wanted to get opinions from other people about his role in the offense and whether or not he's worth dropping or holding onto at this point. The post got deleted.. Why? Just curious. I thought I went about it the correct way.

        That almost sounds like a question that would be included in the FAQ....hmmm

        [–]TheProfessorXI miss Scoot. 7 points8 points  (0 children)

        You've got to be kidding me.

        [–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (14 children)

        In my opinion, literally every other fantasy football forum is over-saturated with "player discussion" posts. That's what I like about reddits fantasy football forum. If you want to know what everyone thinks about Decker I guarantee you there will be an in-depth post on the roto forums. I'll go check and post a link below. Here. This literally took two minutes to find. http://forums.rotoworld.com/index.php?showtopic=430072&page=11#entry5033273

        [–]asthepalacesburnn 0 points1 point  (13 children)

        What good does that do for me though? I'd rather have a discussion here. This is done with multiple players all day long on here, so I was just curious as to why my post was singled out. There hadn't been a topic on Decker for a few weeks so I assumed it would be useful.

        [–]TheProfessorXI miss Scoot. 6 points7 points  (10 children)

        "If you feel your post was incorrectly removed, always shoot the mods a message and we'll double check!"

        [–]asthepalacesburnn -9 points-8 points  (9 children)

        Don't you think I already did that? C'mon now. I never got a reply either.

        [–]RevTom 9 points10 points  (0 children)

        The people you are talking to have access to mod mail. You did not send any message.

        [–]mookiemookie 9 points10 points  (2 children)

        Don't you think I already did that? C'mon now. I never got a reply either.

        You sent no modmail.

        [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        [–]asthepalacesburnn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        I definitely did. I have no reason to lie about it. Not sure why you didn't receive it, but I honestly did send you guys a message.

        [–][deleted]  (4 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]asthepalacesburnn 0 points1 point  (3 children)

          I most definitely did send the mods a message. Why would I lie about something like that?

          [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

          Picture of sent message with timestamp?

          [–]RevTom[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

          I just looked again and there is nothing. Can you send me a screenshot of it? Did you send it to a person and not modmail?

          [–]jpeepz83 7 points8 points  (0 children)

          whether or not he's worth dropping or holding onto

          Drop or hold? That sounds like thinly veiled roster advice to me. If you had left that part out, I would think it wouldn't have been deleted. Your end goal may be to determine whether or not you should drop him, but the active discussion should pertain to the player himself. If you open up the "should I drop or hold him" question, you're gonna get people filling the boards with comments like "I dropped him weeks ago" without any substance.

          The only reason you're seeing posts similar to yours not being deleted is because the mods cannot be on watch 24/7 and some will inevitably slip through.

          [–]OCHawkeye14 3 points4 points  (0 children)

          so I was just curious as to why my post was singled out

          "...singled out (with the two hundred and thirty seven other posts the mods had to get rid of)" you mean?

          [–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (3 children)

          Amazing. The mods take the time to put together a very thorough post and FAQ, and the first comment is someone asking a basic question and completely ignoring the post and the FAQ. Fuck.