Senator the Hon Arthur Sinodinos AO
Minister for Industry, Innovation and Science
Parliament House ACT 2600
Dear MinisterArthur
We write in relation to your recent statement that Pauline Hanson’s One Nation is “more sophisticated” than it previously was, in response to a branch of the Liberal Party engaging in unprecedented preference deal with the party. In particular, we seek clarification on how, exactly, One Nation is now more sophisticated than in the late 1990s.
Is this enhanced sophistication reflected in the party’s view of single mothers, given a One Nation candidate’s view that they “are women too lazy to attract and hold a mate”, expressed in the prestigious conservative publication Quadrant?
Or has this greater level of sophistication been demonstrated in the party’s foreign policy views — such as the One Nation candidate who seeks a restoration of white rule in South Africa?
Perhaps the sophistication lies in One Nation’s view of LGBTI Australians? There’s the candidate who claims LGBTI Australians are out to destroy families. Or the candidate who says a society that supports same-sex marriage — which now includes much of the Western world — is “degenerate” and that same-sex marriage is “undermining civilisation and making our culture more like African-American culture with its 70% illegitimacy rate”?
(We note, by the way, that referring to children born to unmarried couples as “illegitimate” stigmatises every child of de facto couples in Australia.)
There is also a One Nation candidate who claims “same-sex marriage will open the door to compulsory homosexual teachings in homes, schools and churches, thereby confusing children, students and congregations because heterosexuality will not be recognised as normal” — although we admit that the image of a sexually confused congregation perhaps represents a sophisticated sense of humour.
Same-sex marriage proponents are also, according to another One Nation candidate, using Nazi mind control programs to change people’s views on the subject — which we’re prepared to allow would be a “sophisticated” psychological weapon.
We’re also unclear on what is “sophisticated” about claiming the 9/11 attacks were fake, given 9/11 truthers have been around so long their lies have become internet memes — although apparently the fake nature of the 9/11 attacks is not official One Nation policy even though the candidate who claims they were fake is still running under the One Nation banner. Perhaps he believes the hijackers used a Nazi mind control program.
Arguably, these are all merely the views of One Nation candidates, rather than the views of its elected officials. We note, however, that your Queensland Senate colleague Malcolm Roberts claims that abortion is a UN plot, that global finance is controlled by wealthy Jewish families via “privately owned central banks” and that they are behind the “hoax” of climate change; indeed, that “Goldman Sachs already controls much of the world reportedly on behalf of the Rothschilds.” As a former bank executive, we understand you would be in a strong position to assess the accuracy and, for that matter, the “sophistication” of such claims. However, we note that none of these conspiracy theories from Roberts are particularly new — indeed, despite One Nation’s strongly protectionist economic policies, Roberts has to import all his conspiracy theories from foreign sources.
Pauline Hanson has also claims that the Family Court system makes men murder women and children out of frustration — is this perhaps a sophisticated analysis of family law and domestic homicide?
Or is it, perhaps, that Hanson’s greater sophistication lies in switching the focus of her hatred and bigotry from Asian Australians to Muslim Australians since the 1990s, reflecting an innovative, agile ability to shift the target of racist demonisation as fashion dictates?
Yours sincerely,
Crikey
For the first time ever, choose what you pay for a year of Crikey.
Like almost every news media out there, we thought we’d struggle to get through these past few months.
So we played our natural game – digging, reporting and holding the powerful to account.
What happened next was truly remarkable. Crikey readers signed up in droves and records were broken day after day, despite the strain the events of 2020 have put on our wallets.
We think it’s because people come to Crikey to understand the news.
While others focus on the day-to-day news cycle, we widen our lens to find out and understand what’s really going on.
But to do that, we need subscribers. Lots of them.
Join Crikey now, and for the first time ever, choose what you pay.
For a short time only, save up to 50% on a year of Crikey, or, chip in a little extra and get Inside Access to Crikey HQ like never before.
Peter Fray
Editor-In-Chief of Crikey
24 thoughts on “Dear Arthur, please explain One Nation’s sophistication”
Mike Smith
February 15, 2017 at 1:19 pmNot sophisticated, they’re sophists. Second definition.
sophist
ˈsɒfɪst/Submit
noun
a paid teacher of philosophy and rhetoric in Greece in the Classical and Hellenistic periods, associated in popular thought with moral scepticism and specious reasoning.
a person who reasons with clever but false arguments.
pinkocommierat
February 15, 2017 at 2:17 pmNah, they’re solipsists.
Mike Smith
February 15, 2017 at 2:32 pmSolipsistic sophists?
AR
February 16, 2017 at 7:54 am… with solipsistic, syllogistic solecisms?
Marwill10
February 15, 2017 at 1:21 pmI hope you kept a copy of your letter, because there is a slight possibility that Arthur will forget to reply, owing to his dodgy memory and all
.
Mike Smith
February 15, 2017 at 2:35 pmWho will play the Terry to his Arthur?
magnet
February 15, 2017 at 1:24 pmDear Crikey
They are more sophisticated because recent polling shows their popularity has grown and we are in the shit in WA.
Arthur
zut alors
February 15, 2017 at 1:53 pmSinodinis meant that some of them now use knives & forks when eating. Progress.
Woopwoop
February 15, 2017 at 8:05 pmImplying that half the world ( who don’t use knives and forks) are therefore backward?
zut alors
February 15, 2017 at 8:41 pmHalf the world wasn’t raised in, or imbued with, Western culture. It was a flippant remark, purely.
AR
February 16, 2017 at 7:59 amPossibly, but they have to keep replacing the office carpets because of knuckle damage.
Saugoof
February 15, 2017 at 1:53 pm“despite One Nation’s strongly protectionist economic policies, Roberts has to import all his conspiracy theories from foreign sources.” – Splendid!
Paddy Forsayeth
February 15, 2017 at 1:54 pmWhen One Nation arrived on the scene some time ago it could be said that they were raw. This time around they have improved…now they are half baked!
Daniel Sharp
February 15, 2017 at 3:15 pm🙂 Again, not wanting to comment on any of the above. It is well in the realm of fair game……..Just making the point that the fact that you are talking about them at all indicates their increased level of ‘sophistication’ (or another word) this time around….Why are we talking about them again?
rumtytum
February 15, 2017 at 3:28 pmArthur’s belief that One Nation is more sophisticated than it used to be reminds me of the person who remarked that Princess Margaret was looking younger. No, he was told, she’s just riding older horses.
Lesley Graham
February 19, 2017 at 5:08 pmRumtytum, that is so funny, but refreshingly to the point. Well observed
Grant
February 15, 2017 at 6:43 pmThe Libs once had the decency to preference them last and engage in all sorts of political skulduggery to destroy them ….. and now they welcome them and pander to them. There’s a bloody good reason or 30 that I no longer vote Liberal
Lesley Graham
February 19, 2017 at 5:17 pmThis is also part of the reason why in the Victorian state election 3 years ago that the Nationals nearly got wiped out in the traditional country areas as independent’s decided to contest seats that, traditionally Nationals hadn’t previously thought they had to worry about, the coalition get/got far to blase’ and clever for their own good.
So politicians need to join the real world occasionally and stop getting so caught up with the political backstabbing & nonsense that seems to be part of Canberra’s, ‘circus like atmosphere’?
klewso
February 15, 2017 at 10:02 pmSophisticted enough to vote with Arfur’s coal worshipping tribe party and swap preferences with it.
This was Howard’s kitchen cabinet “advisor” there for the conception of “non-core promises”, Halverson’s “ultimate solution”, “Children Overboard”, “Iràq/WMDs” and a lot of other “sophisticted solutions”.
And let’s not forget, one of his “reasons” for One Nation’s sophistication evolution was” how the media is treating them now” – owned and operated as much of that is (“70%” of viewspapers), by whom, while they’re not geting in the way of his Party?