Margaret Thatcher aides tried to use photos of baby
Prince William in bid to distract from
1983 anti-nuclear march
Margaret Thatcher's senior aides used pictures of a baby Prince William in an attempt to distract attention from a 1983 anti-nuclear march, official government papers reveal.
Files released by the
National Archives at Kew, west
London, show Ms
Thatcher's press secretary
Bernard Ingham recommending the release of photos of the prince to distract media attention from the
Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (
CND) march. The papers show ministers feared protests at the
Greenham Common airbase in
Berkshire could prevent US missiles from being deployed there.
Foreign Secretary Francis Pym advised Ms
Thatcher the risk of demonstrations could become "so widespread and powerful" deployment of the missiles would "become difficult or even impossible". By
Easter, the focus was on a planned 14 mile "human chain" with tens of thousands of demonstrators linking up in a line extending from Greenham Common to the
Atomic Weapons Research Establishment at
Aldermaston and the
Royal Ordnance Factory at
Burghfield.Fearing only "an assassination attempt on the pope" or "a
North Sea blow out" could steal news attention from the protest, Mr
Ingham recommended the release of footage of Prince William on his first trip to
Australia. "I think
Good Friday is a lost cause. This is the day when the CND chain will (or will not) be formed between Aldermaston and Greenham Common. It is also a day when there is not much sport," he wrote."However, what would take the trick would be press and TV pictures, for TV release on the evening of Good Friday and/or Saturday newspapers of Prince William in Australia."When
Prince Charles and Princess Diana landed at Alice Springs, the 10-month-old prince was briefly displayed to the cameras, the
BBC reports.By the autumn, with the first missiles set to arrive at Greenham Common, Mr Heseltine informed Ms Thatcher there would be four infantry battalions on standby in case of any trouble from the demonstrators.At the same time, he disclosed that
RAF personnel would be "covertly" inserted into the base, with a small number of armed personnel "operating very close to the armed US personnel and with the same rules of engagement"."The political implications of a demonstrator being shot by an
American guard would, at this stage of initial deployment, be very grave," he wrote."Therefore any determined demonstrator who managed to penetrate the perimeter fence and its guard force, and was then able to penetrate the next screen of unarmed UK personnel, would finally confront an armed
British serviceman rather than an armed American."Additional reporting by
Press Association
- published: 21 Jul 2016
- views: 2