Marcello Truzzi

Zeteticism (FLAT EARTH) Vol.1: Zetetic Eye Gyroscope (2nd dr), Curvature Illusion,Ocean currents,Etc

• Report rights infringement
• published: 29 Dec 2015
• views: 8786

2nd draft of Z.E.G. model for Flat Earth, attempts to explain illusion of curvature (Chicago skyline), ocean currents, gravitation, Qantas flight 27, sunset, 24 hour Antarctica sunlight, and other issues. Please understand that to understand this video, you will have to ponder if for a bit. You won’t get it in one quick, unthoughtout viewing. It took me nine months to develop this video/model, and I still only view this as a rough draft. The images in this video involve the AE flat Earth map, but that does not mean the filmmaker is endorsing only that map. For example, in this video, for sake of time and ease, I simply lay-out and plow through the 24 hour Antarctica sunlight description and then I move on. I don't walk the viewer through every single issue with that, such as how when the sun is closer in toward the center (NH inner circle) when it's summer in the USA the sun is likely the same height from the Earth Plane, but will be LOWER from the vantage point of Antarctica since it is more in the center and thus in a LOWER portion of the embowed Earth Plane. This point could be missed by a quick and careless viewer of this video, and one could thus not understand the model properly / as intended. The point is that this video is very intricate--meaning that it probably has a very large number of concepts that the average person has not thought about before and likely won't understand until one ponders for some time. Another example: I did not take the time to outline every single aspect of the Qantas flight 27 issues. There are many ways these flights could be explained, regardless of whether they are all at night or not, and regardless of how much higher those flights really would need to be at in order to make the flight in 11-12 hours at ~800 mph. I only intended to lay out an introduction as to how these flights might work for a plane traveling 800-850 mph. (See this video about flight speeds: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G8KK1....) I was brief. To lay out every detail involved more time than I had. SUMMARY of ZEG model: The keys to making it all work are (1) light refraction across an (2) embowed Earth Plane in a ball/sphere where the plane is (3) below the center of curvature. Those points appear to lead to all the conclusions of this video: artificially lowering of objects in the distance on the horizon (including the sun at sunset), 24 hour Antartica light, nonstop flights from S. America to Australia, gravitation (centrifugal force), and the rest of the points discussed. If embowed slightly, then in the distance you are seeing objects not from a ray of light that traveled perfectly parallel to the Earth Plane from object in the distance to your eyes, but rather tilted slightly UPWARD, and if so, you are viewing it through lessening density, and thus the light will bend/refract upward, and objects will appear lowered on the horizon. Imagine we are holding a rope, it's roughly taught, but slightly embowed, If I look at it one the end perpendicular to my eye, it's bent upward as it points to my eye, but as I look at it, I am looking slightly downward. If the rope is a ray of light, it would carry light and picture information that I'd see pointed slightly downward, and I would see objects thus pointed slightly downward. Hence sunset, Chicago skyline from Michigan, etc. ERRORS IN THIS VIDEO THAT WILL BE CORRECTED IN EITHER LATER VOLUMES OR IN A 3RD DRAFT OF THIS ZEG MODEL: 1. The clip from Vol. 1 of the ZEG starting at of this documentary involves the idea that the Salar is geometrically flat. However, according to the ZEG model, it would not be geometrically flat, but rather the surface of the Salar would be roughly perpendicular to the centrifugal force (what gravity actually might be), and thus the Salar will involve embowment, hence the light refraction of Mt. Tunupa appearing artificially lowered on the horizon. ----THIS WOULD MEAN that Fc would hold water in place along any embowment in the Salar in the way water is held in the bottom of a bucket that is being whirled by a string. Annotations were inserted in this video on 1-9-16 to show this error. 2. There may be an error with the Salar argument later on in the video. I am currently investigating (4-18-2016). THIS IS A ZETETIC MODEL, BUT THERE ARE A FEW POINTS THAT STRAY FROM THAT, AND THIS SHOULD BE ACKNOWLEDGED, AND THOSE PARTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Embowment. 2. Future volumes of this series are being developed to five a full account of these topics to (hopefully) establish their empirical nature, whatever that nature is discovered to be.