Cappadocia-underground cities built when we were monkeys? Underground cities of Goreme n Cappadocia

• Report rights infringement
• published: 31 Dec 2013
• views: 92426

Alexander Koltypin's article on the rock cities of Turkey http://earthbeforeflood.com/who_also_when_had_constructed_underground_and_rocky_cities_of_cappadocia_turkey.html NICE POINT FROM THE COMMENTS SECTION-Phillip Hanford - How can they stack rooms like that while working inside the stone with the floor a precise thickness? If the room floor is too large they would need to make the floor thicker. Special thanks to Mother Ayahuasca who gave me the clarity of mind to inquire into the nature of consciousness and the mysteries of the ancient human species, which "houses" that consciousness In response to a large number of comments full of dirty language and barely relevant to the video above... The bible is interesting book for sure, but i would not take literally as the word of god, at least not the parts where he preaches violence, hatred and revenge. the parts that call for love and compassion are probably true remains of the teachings of jesus. it says that god is all knowing, yet he can’t remember his own story and tells the same event in a completely different way in every gospel. i think the real god is way smarter! and why should i believe it is word of god if it was not even written by him and it was edited by humans though out history? and why should i believe that somebody who orders genocide is supreme god. the god in my heart is full of mercy and love and does not demand the blood of animals or killing of any living being. AND WNY SHOULD I BELIVE IT IS WORD OF GOD IF THOSE WHO SUPPOSEDLY BELIEVE AND CHERISH THE BIBLE ARE SHOWER DIRTY LANGUAGE TO ANYBODY WHO DARES NOT TO FOLLOW THEIR BELIEFS. i beg your pardon, but I do not think jesus will be happy with the venomously insulting low class language used by his so called DEVOTED followers of current times. there is un abundance of example for such language on youtube! ANOTHER EXCELLENT POINT MADE BY THE USER NICK IN THE COMMENTS SECTION ABOUT Cappadocia-underground cities RESEARCH credibility My conclusions are based on the accumulated knowledge of several millennia but mostly on what modern science has done with that knowledge over the last couple of centuries or so. I have confidence in modern science not only because of the innate good sense of what it says but because of what I can verify. I am happy to get on a jumbo and fly because science says it's fine, and it is. So why would science lie about about archaeology and ancient history? AND MY REPLY based on the accumulated knowledge of several millennia - OR ON WHAT THE TV/SCHOOL TELLS YOU TO BE “accumulated knowledge of several millennia”? I have confidence in modern science not only because of the innate good sense of what it says but because of what I can verify. - WHAT IS YOU VERIFICATION BASED ON IF YOU MAKE YOUR CONCLUSIONS BEFORE MAKING THE RESEARCH??? YES, THERE IS GOOD SENCE IN THE SCIENTIFIC APPROACH TOWARDS RESEARCH, BUT THIS DOES MEAN THAT YOU ARE TOLD THE CORRECT RESULTS OF THE RESEARCH. GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS STRICLT FILTER/ADJUST THE MASS MEDIA. I am happy to get on a jumbo and fly because science says it's fine, and it is. - AND DOES THE FLIGHT PROOVE THAT ALL THAT YOU ARE TOLD BY THE TV/SCHOOL IS REALLY SCIENCE? TV/SCHOOL LIES TO THE CITIZENS ABOUT SO MANY THINGS, WHY IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO LIE ABOUT SCIENTIFIC MATTERS AS WELL? IF YOU ARE TOLD THE TRUTH ABOUT THE AIRPLANE, THAT DOES NOT MEAN THAT YOU ARE TOLD THE FULL TRUTH ABOUT ALL THINGS? So why would science lie about about archaeology and ancient history? - NO SCIENCE DOES NOT LIE, THE LIES COME FROM TV/SCHOOL AND ARE OFTEN WRAPPED WITH A GOOD DOSAGE OF COSMETIC TRUTH FOR BETTER LOOKS. THE Cappadocia-underground cities ARE EXCELLENT EXAMPLE. AustralienGuy 19 minutes ago +Nick Nack "science" does lie. Evolution is their biggest Lie as are their dating techniques. +AustralienGuy Again VERY IMPORTANT POINT, THANKS +AustralienGuy! Increasing number of scientists step up and openly disagree with the hypothesis of Darwin - dissentfromdarwin.org. Yet it is still presented in schools/tv as theory AND EVEN AS THE ONLY THEORY, although it is a hypothesis only. It is often presented as the only scientific hypothesis, which is a shameless lie as there are many others. People belief that this is indeed science although it is just a bunch of lies and information of other scientific hypothesis is freely available on internet. Attempts to bring the other hypothesis to public attention are met with personal insults and nonsense like “then you must believe the bible fairy tales”. People believe all this theatre and think that the darwin thing is the ONLY scientific opinion indeed. And so they do not even try to study the other hypothesis although information is avialble. No, science does not lie in this respect, it is misleadingly represented by the mass media and schools.