" A wealth of information..."

"1169 And Counting is a wealth of information on our Republican past and present , and demonstrates how the Irish political landscape , like that of any nation, will never be a black and white issue..."
(From the ‘e-Thursday’ section of the ‘Business Week’ supplement of the ‘Irish Independent’ , 21st August 2008.)

Wednesday, June 04, 2014

LABOUR PAINS AS POLITICAL OPPORTUNISTS VIE FOR A BETTER JUMPING-OFF SPOT.

HOLIDAYS IN A CITY OF CONTRAST - BACK IN EARLY JULY 2014....

....as mentioned already, we are temporarily closing down the blog until either Wednesday July 2nd or July 9th (most likely the latter!) as myself and four friends are off to New York for a three-week holiday, leaving Dublin on Sunday 8th June next and due back on Sunday 29th. We haven't got the same budget that we had last year or in years previous but we know from experience that, comparable to any city its size, you need the big bucks to work and live there but not to holiday there, especially when we have the free use of three modern-build apartments and a mini-van and driver at our beck and call, all gifted to us by our friends and colleagues in that city.

We will still be able to afford at least one good visit to Jersey Gardens and we will be able to do smaller shopping sprees when the mood takes us, plus we'll eat well each day and have a few drinks most nights, but such is the size of New York and the huge number of free options available, we know before we go that three weeks just won't be long enough to fit in everything we would like to! And we are all particularly looking forward to again spending a few days each week in the working-class areas of Harlem, the Bronx , Hell's Kitchen , Queens, Staten Island etc where, over the years that we have been going to New York, we have met the most wonderful, friendly and down-to-earth people that it has ever been our pleasure to spend time with - we have had a few 'dodgy moments' in those areas and on more than one occasion the cops pulled-up beside us and advised us to stay on the main routes, but Manhattan, 5th Avenue and Times Square don't, in our opinion, give a true flavour of that magnificent city.



And, as we always do, we will gladly give a few dollars and/or food to the less fortunate and homeless that we meet on our journeys around the boroughs, as there but for the grace of God go any of us. Anyway : this 8-part post will be our last one until early July. Don't forget to check back with us then, thanks!



By Peadar O'Donnell ; first published in January 1963.

It was by the sheerest chance we discovered that Eoin O'Duffy, Chief of Police, was making out a brief for their Lordships on the degree of communist influence in Ireland in 1931, which was a task greatly to his liking. O'Duffy's position as police chief was often in jeopardy and indeed he was all but out of the job when Kevin O'Higgins was shot, and there were enough people in the know to set up the whisper that O'Duffy was in some way responsible for O'Higgins' death - in fact, he had no connection with it, in any way.

Eoin O'Duffy was a strange man, and a very ambitious one, in a small-boy sort of way. He passionately wanted greatness. and more so in this, the 'era of The Great Man'. Here now was his chance. As scare-maker-in-chief of 'the communist danger', using the Irish bishops as his aides, he could enter politics with a swagger, and so he set about the easy task of scaring their Lordships. He had something as near as no matter to genius in assembling and detailing information.

But it is not enough to dispose of the role of the bishops in Irish political life by adding a few items to the crimes that Liam Mellows listed against them - they did not set out to be enemies of their country, they were the victims of the interests to which they were partisan, and this is a field of study that calls for much patient research. A good starting point for a study of those pastorals can be found in the circumstances that moved His Holiness, Leo XIII, to condemn the Plan of Campaign in Parnell's day, and a good first text book for this study is Father Walsh's life of Archbishop Walsh : his Holiness was responsive to British influence at the Vatican and his condemnation was a direct outcome of it. (MORE LATER).



THE ANATOMY OF AN AFTERNOON : THE STORY OF THE GIBRALTAR KILLINGS........

By Michael O'Higgins and John Waters. From 'Magill Magazine' , October 1988.

In Glasgow, Professor Alan Watson, a Fellow of the Royal College of Pathology, received a call to come to Gibraltar where there had been a shooting. He said he would come next day. He turned on the television and heard that three "IRA terrorists" had been shot dead that afternoon in Gibraltar.

A CONTROLLED EXPLOSION OF THE TRUTH : WHY IT HAD TO BE MURDER.

A prominent Gibraltar doctor and former opposition politician intimated to 'Magill Magazine' in the very first week of the inquest that he would eat his surgical couch if the ensuing verdict turned out to be anything other than 'lawful killing' ; he was watching the proceedings, he said - the massive security, the huge press coverage, the comings and goings of star witnesses - with a mixture of annoyance and amusement. In the course of his practice, he had reason for regular dealings with Gibraltarians of all heights and hues , from the Attorney General down to the newest blow-in migrant worker, and he knew what they all thought about the incident of the IRA and the SAS.

He himself had his reservations about the notion of death squads roaming the streets executing summary justice, he said, but he had learned to keep them to himself. As far as he was concerned he was in a majority of one. "This inquest", he said, "is just a show trial." (MORE LATER).



MICHEÁL MARTIN TAKES THE (WRONG) BOUNDARY COMMISSION TO TASK.

"Gerrymandering" , Mr. Martin called it : "It is the biggest attempt to manipulate election boundaries in the 35 years since Fianna Fail introduced independent Boundary Commissions...." (from here) , adding "....we saw that straight away when the terms of reference were published,that skewing was going on....".

However, a more important 'skewing' by a Boundary Commission has been ignored by Mr. Martin and his party and, indeed, by the administration and the so-called 'opposition' in Leinster House-the 'Boundary Commission' established under 'Article 12'of the 1921 'Treaty of Surrender',which was tasked with 'determining the boundaries between the newly-partitioned 6 and 26-county 'states' ' ,the deliberations of which caused a mutiny within British forces in Ireland! (PART 11)

At 34 years of age, Joe Devlin served as the 'National President' of the Ancient Order of Hibernians, a position he held for 29 years (!) [until he died in 1934], during which time he forged links between the Ancient Order of Hibernians and the United Irish League. He first took a seat in Stormont in 1921 (at 50 years of age) [and stayed there until 1934] ; in 1928 (at 57 years of age) he founded , and Chaired, the 'National League of the North'.

In November 1920, in Belfast, recruitment for the 'Specials' commenced ; the 'calibre' of these 'Specials' can be accurately gauged from an incident on 23rd January 1921, when the RIC were called-out to investigate a claim that a pub in Clones, County Monaghan, was being destroyed by armed men. Thinking it was an IRA Unit 'closing down' a pub because it served and sheltered enemy forces, the RIC 'tooled-up' and hit the road. When they arrived in the area, they pulled-up outside the premises - and immediately opened fire on those inside! And what a pity that those RIC men weren't better shots or more heavily armed, or both, for those inside the pub were members of the 'Special Constabulary', doing what they did best : looting! One of them was shot dead by the RIC gunfire.

Meanwhile, while the 'Specials' were out looting and the RIC (when not doing the same!) were mistakingly shooting at them, the 'Ulster Volunteer Force' (UVF), a Loyalist paramilitary organisation (from which group the 'Specials' came) were still active ; the new man in charge was British Colonel F.H. Crawford, who had played an active part in the Larne gun-running episode in 1914.

Westminster estimated UVF membership at 20,000 armed men ; its leader, Crawford, is perhaps better known for signing his name in blood on 'Ulster's Solemn League and Covenant', and was regarded by those who worked with him as a fanatic. But rather than be alarmed at this 20,000-strong UVF organisation, the British were considering using it for their own advantage - the RIC were known to be in favour of such a move. (MORE LATER).



INAUGURAL RUAIRÍ Ó BRÁDAIGH SUMMER SCHOOL, ROSCOMMON, 6TH , 7TH AND 8TH JUNE 2014.

The inaugural Ruairí Ó Brádaigh Summer School will take place at the Abbey Hotel, Roscommon on June 6th,7th, and 8th. The event will involve discussion and debate covering a range of topics and issues which were central to the life of Ruairí Ó Brádaigh such as the history and development of Irish Republicanism, the Irish language, the international dimension of the Irish struggle in the context of global anti-imperialism and the Éire Nua programme for a New Ireland of which Ruairí Ó Brádaigh was an architect and champion. The summer school will also include a reflection on the life of Ruairí Ó Brádaigh by people who were comrades and friends over many decades. Among the speakers are Professor Robert W. White, biographer of Ruairí Ó Brádaigh, Desmond Fennell, Dr Kevin Bean, Dr Marisa McGlinchey, Maura Harrington and the President of Republican Sinn Féin, Des Dalton.

The weekend will culminate with a commemoration at the graveside of Ruairí Ó Brádaigh in St Coman’s Cemetery on Sunday June 8th at 12 Noon where the oration will be given by the President of Republican Sinn Féin Des Dalton. The weekend will be a celebration of the life of Ruairí Ó Brádaigh and a forum for engagement with the issues which motivated and inspired him throughout his life. All genuine Irish republicans welcome!





ASDA : WHEN IS A K-K-KOODIE NOT A FLAG?

Maybe Asda management know their market better than the rest of us think they do, or maybe Asda's marketing department think they, or their management team, are 'in tune' with their customer base - if there really is no such thing as bad publicity,then Asda has not scored an own goal.The item, pictured, left, is apparently a 'wearable flag' which someone along the way - from design,to production to the shop floor - must have realised bore a striking resemblance to a Ku Klux Klan uniform. And safe, in my opinion, to believe the similarities were noticed at some point and a clear decision made to proceed, either for reasons of publicity and/or because an Asda agent reckoned that such an item would appeal to the mentality of those it perceived to be the intended customer it was aiming at.

Either way, it's a 'win' for that Walmart-owned company : play the good guy and withdraw the KKK-look-a-like items before the initial outburst of free publicity evaporates or capitalise on that free publicity by stocking and selling as many of the £3 items as they can under the guise of 'champion of free expression' or some-such lame excuse.

And, who knows, but if that 'KKK range' is a best seller for them, they might just try for a repeat performance in a few months time with a 'Black Power'-type kit. You have to be pragmatic in your hunt for the mighty dollar.



ANOINT, THEN APPOINT, YOUR 'ENEMY'.

The current British 'police force' in Ireland, the RUC/PSNI, follows the same path taken by its predecessor in relation to its attitude to 'Irish taigs' ie the 'taigs' reject and oppose British rule in Ireland and as such they are fair game for abuse Or worse (incidentally, that particular attitude is shared by the 'police force' in the 26-County State as well).

You would think, therefore, that when a 'taig' who considers himself to be an Irish republican is given the opportunity by Westminster to not only highlight the many injustices perpetrated by that British paramilitary outfit but to have a say in its operational status, that he would use that opportunity to at least verbally question the existence of such a force in Ireland. Not so, unfortunately - Gerry Kelly, Provisional Sinn Féin, was gifted such an opportunity recently but proved himself to be a safe pair of hands as far as Westminster was concerned - he helped appoint a new boss for the paramilitary RUC/PSNI unit rather than attempt to frustrate that force in its internal business operations!

Then again, had he made proper use of that opportunity, he would have fallen out with his colleague who also had such an opportunity but, like Gerry Kelly, decided that not only is it the duty of an Irish 'republican' to support an armed British militia in Ireland but it's equally acceptable to assist in appointing the leadership of same. And to think that the British once professed to believing that 'republicans' like that were the 'enemy', when all along they were apparently grooming them for employment. Mixed metaphor there somewhere re poachers, gamekeepers , friends/enemies, close and closer!



LABOUR PAINS - BUT IT'S THE REST OF US THAT ARE SUFFERING THEM!

Following on quickly from their recent near-annihilation at polling stations, the State Labour Party have, they believe, figured out what their problem is - their leadership let them down!

At the time of writing, a battle is on-going within that party as various wannabe political careerists vie with each other to position themselves at the top table in this Fine Gael/Any Party prop, due to their belief that if placed at that table, they have a better chance at picking-up a cosy little number for themself in Brussels in later years, as per this example.

Apart, of course, from the woes of that Party not having anything to do with its leadership - who are no more incompetent and self-serving than the leadership of any other Party in Leinster House - those challenging for top table positions are all in one way or another associated with the wage and social welfare cutbacks and the property and water taxes etc that have been introduced since they took office in 2011 and which they now either voice 'concern' about, or oppose altogether! As those rats struggle to obtain a better jumping-off point from their sinking ship, those of us who call for a fairer system (instead of seeking to place 'new faces' in charge of an old, failed, system) - the real issue at the heart of the rotten politics in this corrupt State - are trampled in the rush. And, indeed, to be trampled in the rush is something that the Labour Party now know something about!

Thanks for reading - off on holidays soon, back here in early July 2014. Slán go foill anois! (Have a Nice Day!!) Sharon.






Wednesday, May 28, 2014

BATONS, BALLOTS AND BODENSTOWN.

By Peadar O'Donnell ; first published in January 1963.

It was largely hesitation to embark on concrete struggles that influenced the IRA to give itself a social policy ; it was in many ways evasive action , although it drew the full fury of reaction on itself thereby. The impulse towards policy making was sharpened by threats by the unemployed that they would seize the principal hotels in Dublin and hold them in protest. The search for a policy produced 'Saor Éire', which aroused the fury of government, press and pulpit.

At the risk of beheading the movement at a critical period the IRA Army Council decided to call a general army convention to sanction the launching of Saor Éire, and to consider some other matters. Roisin Walsh, Dublin City Librarian, a courageous, brilliant woman, gave us the use of her home at Templeogue, Dublin, for the conference, and it was an ideal choice for us, permitting of maximum security on the easiest possible terms but she was risking her job. Following on decisions taken at that convention , instructions were given to all IRA units to make the Easter Commemoration of that year demonstrations in strength, and even those demonstrations were to be but a rehearsal for a great hosting of Republican Ireland at Tone's grave, June 1931.

There was some speculation among us whether their Lordships the bishops would have another go at us, after the fashion of their 1922 effort. There didn't seem to be much room for improvement on their strictures against us then, for the Pastoral of 1922 disposed of us by declaring the armed defence of the Republic to be a system of murder and assassination, and the men involved in it unfit for admission to Confession or Holy Communion. That seemed a final sort of document, disposing of the IRA in a final sort of way.(MORE LATER).



THE ANATOMY OF AN AFTERNOON : THE STORY OF THE GIBRALTAR KILLINGS........

By Michael O'Higgins and John Waters. From 'Magill Magazine' , October 1988.

Police Constable Kassan was at the police station and at about 3.40pm he received a call to go to Winston Churchill Avenue : when he arrived at the Shell station he was told by someone there to go to Kings Lines. There, he saw a body on the ground, face up, and there were newspapers on the ground beside the body and he placed a stone on top of them to stop them blowing away. He went back to the petrol station to pick up some sheets from an ambulance he had seen there and returned to Kings Lines where he was told by Sergeant Acriss to pick up cartridges and did as he was told. He said there were a number of spent shells close to the body - one or two at least, he thought - and a number of others about fifteen or twenty feet away on the right side of the roadway.

Back in the Operations Room, Soldier 'E' received a report at 3.47pm that the "apprehension" of the terrorists had taken place and another thirteen minutes passed before he got confirmation that the three had been shot dead. He was told that Soldiers 'A' to 'D' were safely out of the area and that the police were in charge. At this point he reported bck to Soldier 'F' who signed the document handing back control to the Commissioner at 4.06pm. Soldier 'E' then left the Operations Room and went to the scenes of the shootings and later he spoke to them in the Room. No notes were taken of this conversation and afterwards they went to the police station with the army lawyer. All the SAS soldiers left Gibraltar at about 11pm that Sunday night and returned to the UK.

Commissioner Canepa instructed Deputy Commissioner Columbo to put the plan for the evacuation of the square area and the diversion of traffic into operation. Mr Columbo phoned Chief Inspector Lopez who attempted to evacuate the area with two other officers, but this proved impossible and the plan had to be delayed for some time until other police officers became available. It was after 7pm before controlled explosions on the Renault had been completed and the area declared safe. No explosives were found (it would be Tuesday before a large quantity of semtex was found in a car in Spain). Mr Canepa also put Superintendent McGuinness (!) in charge of the situation at Winston Churchill Avenue and arranged for a pathologist to be sent from the UK. (MORE LATER).



MICHEÁL MARTIN TAKES THE (WRONG) BOUNDARY COMMISSION TO TASK.

"Gerrymandering" , Mr. Martin called it : "It is the biggest attempt to manipulate election boundaries in the 35 years since Fianna Fail introduced independent Boundary Commissions...." (from here) , adding "....we saw that straight away when the terms of reference were published,that skewing was going on....".

However, a more important 'skewing' by a Boundary Commission has been ignored by Mr. Martin and his party and, indeed, by the administration and the so-called 'opposition' in Leinster House-the 'Boundary Commission' established under 'Article 12'of the 1921 'Treaty of Surrender',which was tasked with 'determining the boundaries between the newly-partitioned 6 and 26-county 'states' ' ,the deliberations of which caused a mutiny within British forces in Ireland!(Part10)

Nationalists knew the danger of such a move for them - the UVF were not by any means 'neutral' in the conflict. The then 'Daily News' newspaper stated, re the proposed establishment of the 'Specials' - "The official proposal to arm "well-disposed" citizens to "assist the authorities" in Belfast raised serious questions of the sanity of the government. It seems the most outrageous thing which they have ever done in Ireland. A citizen of Belfast who is "well-disposed" to the British government is, almost from the nature of the case, an Orangeman, or at any rate, a vehement anti-Sinn Féiner. These are the very same people who have been looting Catholic shops and driving thousands of Catholic women and children from their homes...." But all words of opposition, or even caution , were ignored. Sixteen (16) battalions (approximately 10,000 armed men) were organised throughout the Six County area, with about three times that number (ie about 30,000 men) being placed in the areas where the battalion structure did'nt reach : approximately 40,000 fully-armed and, for the most part, militarily-trained men , in all.

It wasn't only Nationalist and Republicans that were aware of the potential for trouble that could come from arming one section of a population - voices were raised in Westminster itself, against such a move - in October of 1920, a Mr. J.R. Clynes of the British Labour Party voiced his concern, in Westminster, that the British Government were actully "arming the Orangemen" to "police their Catholic neighbours ..." in the Six County 'State', while Joe Devlin ('United Irish League' - UIL) pointed out that 300 of the 'Special Constables' from the Lisburn area had already "resigned in protest" because their "fellow Constables" would not stop looting their (Catholic) neighbours !

Mr. Devlin stated - "The Protestants are to be armed. Their pogrom is to be made less difficult. Instead of paving stones and sticks they are to be given rifles." Joe Devlin led a busy life, but died young, at 63 years of age, in 1934. A barman and journalist at the start of his working life, he was elected as a 'Home Rule MP' (British Parliament) for North Kilkenny in 1902, at 31 years young , and held his seat until 1906, when he was elected again, this time for the West Belfast area.

He was that area's representative in Westminster until 1922 ; he acted as General Secretary for the 'United Irish League' (UIL) / Home Rule Party, from 1904 to 1920, and was also involved with the 'Ancient Order of Hibernians'. (MORE LATER).



BATONS AND BALLOTS.

Our suggestion that those entitled to a vote in last Friday's elections - but who had not intended to claim same - should instead present themselves at their polling stations and purposely spoil their ballot papers seems to have been a popular call, as tens of thousands of spoiled votes have been recorded in this State. We are not claiming all the credit (that belongs to those who done that, regardless of whether they were aware of our suggestion or not) but we like to think that we did influence at least a few hundred or a few thousand voters into that course of action! In this area of Dublin, for instance, 263 spoiled votes were recorded, and in near-by Tallaght that figure was 1128. The 'Dublin City' ward (city centre and 'attached' suburbs, if you like) recorded 2377 spoiled votes whilst the Fingal area seen 978 people spoil their votes (more info here) .

Indeed, at a stretch, perhaps, it could be said that by encouraging as many possible voters as we could to spoil their ballot(s) rather than give it/them to an establishment party, we 'spoilers' have been somewhat credited with damaging the cosy consensus in that it was a shortage of such votes which prevented the State Labour Party from taking more seats thus leading to the resignation of its leader.

Another favour we may have done ourselves by deliberately voting against those political careerists and wannabe political careerists is that - shock! horror! - not all of them (!) are as clean-cut, morally, as they would present themselves as.....

"Great to turn on Sky News and see the knackers kicked up and down the dale however will the cops get the smell of nack of their batons."

......a comment made three years ago, in reference to this disgraceful episode, by a Provisional Sinn Féin candidate, which he only got pulled-up for last week! For all we 'spoilers' know, we might very well have removed a few such fascist-type political opportunists from the corrupt political scene here before they even got the chance to raise a verbal 'baton' against us. And for that we are surely to be congratulated!



MONTHLY RAFFLE ? YES...AND NO. BODENSTOWN ? NO. THE BRONX ? YES!!



I have already mentioned here in a previous post that whilst I will be helping to run the next monthly raffle (for the Cabhair organisation, to be held on Sunday 8th June next) , I won't be able to give the usual report re same and I also mentioned the up-coming Wolfe Tone Commemoration in Bodenstown which, unfortunately, I won't be able to attend, or report on, the reason being that myself and four friends are flying out to New York City on Sunday night, 8th June, for a full three weeks holiday!

In early April last, our friends and colleagues in New York, with whom we keep in regular contact, asked the five of us over for a month , accommodation and transport (hello, Joel!) provided, no charge, spending money only needed. And, whilst NYC can be very expensive, it is very easy to have an unbelievable time in that great city on a budget of about $50 dollars a day, without having to cut corners. For example, the five of us have enjoyed a day in Central Park and explored surrounding streets and avenues, window-shopping and general sight-seeing, with plenty to eat and a drink or two in the evening, and calling Joel at maybe 11pm for a lift back to the apartment - relaxed and exhausted, having spent only about $30 dollars each! The same goes for a day trip to Coney Island, Staten Island, Long Island and at least a dozen other fantastic places which we have visited before and are only itchin' to get back to!

When five working-class cats like us are let loose on and in NYC, we make sure we get the cream!

Only two of us could manage, between family and work commitments etc, to get a whole month to play with, but the five of us could all manage, eventually, to get three weeks - and that's what we have done, and we should be home on Monday, 30th June (not that I want to talk, write or even think about that just now!). I'd like to think that I'd be fit enough to post a holiday report on this blog on Wednesday , July 2nd - I doubt it, somehow! - but you never know. But, hopefully, by the following Wednesday (9th), we should be back to normal. Next Wednesday, June 4th, will therefore be our last post here for at least one month. I'll miss the '1169...' team (John and 'Junior'), and work (!)...and of course you, our readers. But my aim is getting better ;-) !!

Thanks for reading, Sharon.






Wednesday, May 21, 2014

UVF : "WE ARE HEAVILY ARMED PROTESTANTS DEDICATED TO THIS CAUSE...."

By Peadar O'Donnell ; first published in January 1963.

At the same time our road of approach was a cautious one - we were an unarmed organisation although we possessed arms ; the 'cease fire dump arms' order of 1923 was still binding on the IRA. The experience of the period of armed resistance to the Treaty of Surrender was that small bands of armed men and women waging guerilla warfare against governmental forces, however bogus the government's mandate, moving around among friendly people held to them by nothing more than sympathy, have little chance of victory. ('1169' comment : the men and women that took up arms in 1916, and before them, were "a small band" and, although they didn't achieve victory there and then, their actions guaranteed the continuation of the struggle.) It would be a different affair if the IRA came into the picture on the side of the people against the bailiff, drawing the State forces into guerilla warfare against the people - many members of the State forces would desert to the popular side.

But my experience convinced me the IRA need not enter into the campaign against land annuities, as armed men. They could bring down the usurping government merely by stiffening the rising countryside and urban struggles to create a position where Fenian Ireland could win power, in at least part of Ireland, by putting forward a panel of candidates to win a majority. I had no patience with Sinn Féin hesitations to tramp through Leinster House on the way to the Republic. ('1169' comment : the road to hell is paved with good intentions, and Leinster House is one of those 'paved' areas as far as Irish republicans are concerned.) Equally, I had no time for parliamentary agitation not linked with field work.

I think it likely that at one time the IRA leadership would have been inclined to take this road, could they have seen a line of struggle, as well sanctioned, on concrete issues on the urban front. The IRA had great support in the towns, but they did not lead the trade union movement in the way leadership in the countryside was open to them, had they moved in with my committees. I argued the weakness of our Dublin organisation again and again, urging that instead of organising by areas, units should be recruited within industries - a couple of IRA companies on the docks, a battalion within the building trade etc. Even without this, IRA influence in the trade unions and in the leadership of the unemployed would have given us enough urban strength to smother attempts to rouse urban reaction by incitement, except in Belfast. But the revolutionary strength of the Fenian forces lay in the countryside. (MORE LATER).



THE ANATOMY OF AN AFTERNOON : THE STORY OF THE GIBRALTAR KILLINGS........

By Michael O'Higgins and John Waters. From 'Magill Magazine' , October 1988.

DC Huart, who had been on duty on the Spanish side of the border during the morning, had returned to Gibraltar and and had received a call to go to Smith Dorrien Avenue at 3.40pm. He went by motorbike. He had briefly seen the three IRA members at the junction but had gone into Laguna estate and had not seen any shooting. He ran towards the Shell station and saw the two bodies on the ground and cartridges scattered all around. He borrowed blankets from people living nearby and covered the bodies.

Special Branch officers 'P' , 'Q' and 'R' were there also. Officer 'P' supervised the transportation of Soldiers 'A' and 'B' from the scene, and delegated to Inspector Revegliatte the task of searching the bodies for guns or a remote control button. The Inspector called the police station at 3.42pm asking for ambulances - it was about two minutes since he had received the call to return to the station. Senior officers then arrived and took over. Inspector Revegliatte heard that another shooting had taken place at Kings Lines and he then went there and searched the body of Seán Savage. He found nothing unusual on any of the bodies. He drew a chalk mark around Savage's body and also marked places where spent cartridges had fallen.

Sergeant Emilio Acriss had been one of the policemen in the car with Inspector Revegliatte : he had jumped over the barrier in the middle of the road and had afterwards organised a traffic diversion. A passerby told him about another shooting and he had gone to Kings Lines where he met two men in plain clothes. They informed him that everything was under control, that they were acting on behalf of the Commissioner, and asked him to take charge. Sergeant Acriss then started to collect the cartridges as there was a lot of people about and he was afraid that they might be picked up. He noted that there were a number of shells , about nine or ten, scattered in a group about ten feet from the body. There was a second group of shells much nearer to the body, about four feet from the head. Seán Savage was lying with his feet about two feet from the tree and his head pointing towards the town.

Police Constable Clive Borrell was the driver of the patrol car which sounded its siren on Winston Churchill Avenue and which arrived on the scene of the shooting. He told the inquest that he did not hear any shots fired until after the car had driven past the petrol station. The siren, according to Sergeant Acriss's evidence, had been alternating between the on and off positions, but the beacon remained on throughout. When they came back up Winston Churchill Avenue, PC Borrell jumped the barrier in the centre of the road and saw two bodies on the ground and then, on his own initiative, he jumped back across the barrier and drove the car back down to the junction of Smith Dorrien Avenue, using it to block off all northbound traffic. A few minutes later he drove four people out of the area - two of them were Officers 'P' and 'Q' , and Soldiers 'A' and 'B'. He dropped them off at the police station and then went to the assembly area to help with the evacuation plan. (MORE LATER).



MICHEÁL MARTIN TAKES THE (WRONG) BOUNDARY COMMISSION TO TASK.

"Gerrymandering" , Mr. Martin called it : "It is the biggest attempt to manipulate election boundaries in the 35 years since Fianna Fail introduced independent Boundary Commissions...." (from here) , adding "....we saw that straight away when the terms of reference were published,that skewing was going on....".

However, a more important 'skewing' by a Boundary Commission has been ignored by Mr. Martin and his party and, indeed, by the administration and the so-called 'opposition' in Leinster House - the 'Boundary Commission' established under 'Article 12' of the 1921 'Treaty of Surrender', which was tasked with 'determining the boundaries between the newly-partitioned 6 and 26-county 'states' ' , the deliberations of which caused a mutiny within British forces in Ireland! (Part 9)

....... on 3rd December 1925 at a meeting in Downing Street in London , Free State President William Cosgrave and his 'Minister for Home Affairs' , Kevin O'Higgins , agreed that there should be no change to Britains imposed 'border' in Ireland , that the 'Council of Ireland' be scraped and that monies received from the British by way of financial compensation for the damage that Westminster's Black and Tans caused in Ireland would be re-paid ! Those Free State gombeens also agreed to continue paying land annuities to the British Exchequer!

On their return to Dublin a few days later , Cosgrave and O'Higgins , after selling-out to the British once more , stuck their chests out and declared - "Today we have sown the seeds of peace ..." ! Bullshit 'spin-doctors', then and now. And to ensure that nobody could find out just how those "seeds of peace" had been 'won', it was not only agreed that the Boundary Commission be revoked, but also that its 'findings' be kept hidden ; it was only published 44 years later, in 1969!

Another episode relating to the Boundary Commission centres around the speech which the Stormont 'Prime Minister', 'Sir' James Craig, delivered in said institution on 7th October 1924, in which he 'reminded' the Westminster Government that he had 40,000 armed men who, like him , were not prepared to accept an "unfavourable" decision by the Boundary Commission and would take any steps necessary "to defend their territory ..." (ie - the Six County 'State'). 'Sir' Craig was referring to the 'Ulster (sic) Special Constabulary Association' , which was organised in three groups - the full-time A Specials, the part-time B Specials, and an 'on-call' ("loose category") of C Specials.

The A Specials lived in barracks' and were used as re-inforcements for the RIC ; the B Specials concentrated on street-patrols and setting-up checkpoints, while the C Specials had no specific duties but were 'on call' as an armed (pro-British) militia. Incidentally , when 'Sir' James Craig (Stormont 'Prime Minister') demanded the establishment of "a special Constabulary" for the Six County area (which he did , at a meeting in London on 2nd September 1920) he had only to wait six days for a reply - on 8th September 1920, Westminster agreed that a force of "loyal citizens" should be raised - the then 'Ulster Volunteer Force' (UVF), an armed pro-British paramilitary organisation in the Six Counties was, effectively , to become a ('legitimate') force of 'Special Constabulary' - with a simple change of uniform!

It is arguably the position that this was the first instance of Westminster treating the Six County 'State' as a separate unit from what they alleged to believe was the 'United Kingdom'. However - the fact that Westminster was about to 'dress-up' a Loyalist militia as a 'Police Force', and arm same, sent shock-waves into the Nationalist community.... (MORE LATER).



44 YEARS AGO (1970-2014): USC ('B SPECIALS') DISBANDED.

The 'B Specials': this outfit earned recognition for being a unionist 'police force' for a unionist Six-County 'State'.

....... by Christmas Day, 1925 , the 'A' and 'C'-Specials were no more, but the B-Specials had been 'beefed-up' - it was now, in reality , the 'Ulster Volunteer Force' loyalist terror-gang in a British uniform, operating as per usual, but this time with the official protection of Westminster....

The B-Specials seen the Civil Rights Movement of the late 1960's as a personal challenge to their 'position' in society and took no prisoners when told to "police and monitor" the meetings and marches associated with those looking for equal treatment under British jurisdiction. The B-Specials left many a bloody footprint in the street. Ironically, it was the fact that they suppressed the Civil Rights campaign so viciously which led to their disbandment ;their blatant sectarianism, witnessed by the worlds media (courtesy of an RTE camera-crew on the spot) acutely embarrassed the Brits ; in October 1969, Westminster pulled-off another 'sleight-of-hand' trick , comparable to that of 1920, when they put the Ulster Volunteer Force (UVF) loyalist gun-gang into a British uniform and called them the B-Specials.

It was announced , with fanfare , that the B-Specials would be disbanded and, on 1st April, 1970 they 'were', but in name only. The British presented the 'disbandment' of the B-Specials as "a fair solution" by 'a fair administration' to a problem which they had only recently been made aware of (!) and gratefully accepted the plaudits from those foolish enough to offer them. However , the British, as usual , gave with the one hand and took with the other : within weeks of the "disbandment" of the B-Specials, the British announced that a "new " part-time force was to be established - the 'Ulster Defence Regiment' (UDR) . The 'Ulster Defence Regiment' was to be placed under the 'control' of the British Army and was to be issued with top-of-the-range weaponary.

Self-loading rifles, sub-machine guns, Bren guns and Browning machine guns mounted on armoured cars ; about eight-thousand members of the 'old' B-Specials/Ulster Volunteer Force joined the 'new' force, put on a different British uniform and basically carried-on from where they had left off. In one form or another, in one uniform or another and with one name or another, the British and/or their lackeys in this country have never shrinked from using violence to maintain their grip on Ireland or part thereof. It is of no concern to Republicans whether they call themselves the British Army, the Ulster Volunteer Force, the B-Specials, the Ulster Defence Regiment or the Police Service of Northern Ireland (sic). Their shared objective is to sustain an unnatural entity - the British presence in Ireland. They might as well try and stop the tide coming in....! [END] (Incidentally , on this date [21st May] in 1966, the 'UVF' issued the following statement (and here) : "From this day, we declare war against the Irish Republican Army and its splinter groups. Known IRA men will be executed mercilessly and without hesitation. Less extreme measures will be taken against anyone sheltering or helping them, but if they persist in giving them aid, then more extreme methods will be adopted...we solemnly warn the authorities to make no more speeches of appeasement. We are heavily armed Protestants dedicated to this cause..." Translation - 'We will shoot dead any Catholic in response to you shooting any anti-republican military target'. Or 'KAT/FAP' for short.)



TWO OF OUR TWENTY-TWO HUNGER-STRIKERS DIED ON THIS DATE (21st May) 33 YEARS AGO.

Raymond McCreesh (PIRA) and Patsy O'Hara (INLA), both of whom died on hunger-strike in the H-Blocks of Long Kesh prison on the 21st May 1981.

On Saturday 1st May, 1976, Westminster began treating political prisoners in the Occupied Six Counties as 'criminals', whereas up to Friday 30th April 1976, that same institution classed those same prisoners as 'political'. This move forced the prisoners to demand that they be afforded the right to be recognised as that which they still were - political prisoners - and various protests inside the prison structure were held. A blanket protest, no-wash protest and a 'dirty protest' 'gained' unfulfilled promises from Westminster and, after four years of protest, in the H-Blocks and on the streets of Ireland and abroad, Irish republicans announced that a hunger-strike to re-gain political status would commence on the 27th October 1980. The POW's issued five demands - the right not to wear a prisoner uniform, the right to free association with other republican political prisoners, the right as political prisoners not to do prison work, the right to organise their own educational and recreational facilities and the right to one weekly visit,letter and parcel.

PIRA Volunteer Raymond McCreesh,24 years of age, from St. Malachy's Park, Camlough in South Armagh, was captured by British forces in June 1976 and convicted in March 1977 of attempting to kill British soldiers, possession of a Garland rifle and ammunition and PIRA membership and was sentenced to 14 years imprisonment. He commenced a hunger-strike on 22nd March 1981 and died 61 days later, on 21st May 1981.

INLA Volunteer Patsy O'Hara, 23 years of age (in 1981), from the Bishop Street area in Derry, was arrested on 14th May 1979 and charged with possessing a hand-grenade. In January 1980 he was sentenced to eight years in jail and, on 22nd March 1981, he commenced a hunger-strike. He died on 21st May 1981, after 61 days.

The issue at the heart of the conflict, then, as now, was and is political, and will always be regarded as such by the republican activists that are involved in the struggle, regardless of the 'criminal/gangster'-tag which those who don't have a problem with the British presence continually attempt to label us with. The campaign will not be considered finished until the objective - to remove the political and military claim from Westminster over any part of Ireland - has been secured, regardless of how long it takes.



N.O.T.A. VOTE FOR FRIDAY 23RD MAY 2014 - WATER TAX , PROPERTY TAX ETC ; NOT WITH MY BACKING!

Two ballot papers will by now have been issued to those of voting age in this State, for local ('county council') and European elections, which are being held here on Friday 23rd May 2014. As usual, there are more candidates for this 'thankless task' (Ha!) than seats available (for instance,in the county of Wicklow, 79 candidates are campaigning for 32 seats and in county Offaly, 38 candidates are fighting it out over 19 seats) but I, for one, won't be voting for any of them. I will collect both ballot papers due to me and I will purposely spoil both of them, by writing a message on each one before placing it in the ballot box.

If I lived in a certain part of Galway or Kerry I would vote for the republican candidate in the 'Local' elections and just spoil the EU ballot, but I don't and, as such - not being prepared to vote second-best - I'll be spoiling my two ballot papers. There are so-called 'left wing' candidates contesting for seats in the part of Dublin that I'll be casting my ballots in and, whilst they are solid (verbally so, at least!) on issues such as the bin tax, the household tax, the USC tax, the property tax, water tax etc, when questioned in relation to the on-going political and military occupation, by Westminster, of six of our north-eastern counties, they attempt to assure me that 'the issue is settled, thanks to the peace process/Good Friday Agreement...' and, when I ask about their opinion in regards to the continuing claim by Westminster of jurisdictional control over those six counties I have received replies ranging from 'yes, but it's a lot quieter now than what it was...' to 'we should concentrate on bread-and-butter issues instead...'. The two republican candidates mentioned above are as concerned about the unsettled six-county issue as they are about the bread-and-butter issues and reflect my own views and concerns better than any other candidate does but, as stated, I don't have a vote in their area and refuse to simply vote against a useless and corrupt State administration and for those that, in my opinion, are hoping to receive enough votes to enable them to stick their snout in the same trough as those they are hoping to unseat.

My advice to those who have no intention of even collecting their ballot papers, never mind using them to vote with, is to collect them and use them in the manner mentioned above : write 'None Of The Above' on both ballot papers or perhaps something a bit stronger - but do, please, use them in this manner to get your message across.

Thanks for reading, Sharon.






Wednesday, May 14, 2014

"I REMAINED FAITHFUL TO WHAT I THOUGHT THE CAUSE OF MY COUNTRY...." - WOLFE TONE.

By Peadar O'Donnell ; first published in January 1963.

As it became clear that the Free State government had in mind to subject the IRA to a mounting system of police thuggery, the possibility of another armed clash forced itself into republican discussions, and with it came talk of the need for a republican policy. We were back to Liam Mellows; at any time the IRA chose, it could have put itself at the head of the whole republican movement, pushing past Fianna Fáil, de Valere and all, to reach the 1919 position at one stride, by releasing its members into the land annuity agitation.

Such was my view and it was straight out of James Fintan Lalor - the law enforcing the payment of land annuities had no resting place in the moral code, but it was part of the very nature of government. Once the IRA cut across it, the government just could not back away. The IRA in its challenge to the Free State government , was on easy terms with itself. The 'Government of Ireland Act 1920' was rejected with scorn by the Irish people and any good in it was brushed aside because of its provision for partition. Arthur Griffith and Michael Collins made the case that the people's decision on the 1920 Act did not extend to the Treaty of 1921, because the Treaty had in it the power to enforce national unity.

Whether the Irish negotiators were incompetent or merely innocent need not be discussed, for the other side was unashamedly dishonest : when the time came to invoke the 'Boundary Clause', on which Griffith and Collins rested their case to the people, it was used to make the Treaty a worse instrument on the issue that transcended all other issues, partition, than the Act of 1920. The tragedy was not that men and women died for the Republic, but that they died to enforce this swindle*. But the people's hour was at hand. (* '1169' comment - whereas those in Ireland that seek to enforce this swindle just get fat and comfortable on the rewards from the British and the Free Staters for doing so.) (MORE LATER).



THE ANATOMY OF AN AFTERNOON : THE STORY OF THE GIBRALTAR KILLINGS........

By Michael O'Higgins and John Waters. From 'Magill Magazine' , October 1988.

Gibraltarian bank clerk Kenneth Asquez was in a line of traffic stopped at the lights on Corral Road that evening. In an unsigned statement to representatives of the Thames TV programme 'This Week', he had said that he turned when he heard cracking noises and saw a man with his foot on the neck of another man who was on the ground. The second man was bleeding and the man on top had a gun and was wearing a black beret. He produced identification and said - "Stop, it's okay. It's the police". He then fired two or three shots into the head of the man on the ground from point blank range.

At the inquest, Mr Asquez said that this statement had been false, that it had been made under pressure and that he had gleaned the details for it from media reports or "on the streets" : nothing that he had said in the statement was true, he claimed. Soldier 'C' said at the inquest that he had handed in only his partially empty magazine to the police station and had retained the other one which he had not used. Soldier 'D "wasn't sure" if he had handed in his own unused magazines.

At Kings Lines, immediately after the shooting of Seán Savage, Soldier 'C' had taken steps to stop people crowding around the body by preventing people passing through from the tunnel. Soldier 'D', meanwhile, was making a radio report to the Operations Room- he also gave an account to a security guard from a nearby hut. Both put on berets which Soldier 'D' had been carrying in a small rucksack. They were there for about ten minutes before a policeman came to take charge. One of the surveillance officers told Soldier 'C' that Soldiers 'A' and 'B' had shot Mairéad Farrell and Daniel McCann at the petrol station. When the policeman arrived, Soldiers 'C' and 'D' left the area and went on foot to the Operations Room. (MORE LATER).



MICHEÁL MARTIN TAKES THE (WRONG) BOUNDARY COMMISSION TO TASK.

"Gerrymandering" , Mr. Martin called it : "It is the biggest attempt to manipulate election boundaries in the 35 years since Fianna Fail introduced independent Boundary Commissions...." (from here) , adding "....we saw that straight away when the terms of reference were published,that skewing was going on....".

However, a more important 'skewing' by a Boundary Commission has been ignored by Mr. Martin and his party and, indeed, by the administration and the so-called 'opposition' in Leinster House - the 'Boundary Commission' established under 'Article 12' of the 1921 'Treaty of Surrender', which was tasked with 'determining the boundaries between the newly-partitioned 6 and 26-county 'states' ' , the deliberations of which caused a mutiny within British forces in Ireland! (Part 8)

....... rumours were being spread that the Boundary Commission had decided to order the Free Staters in Leinster House to cede some of its territory to Stormont ; the Free Staters declared that that would not happen but then , days later , its one and only representative on that three-person Commission , Eoin MacNeill , resigned from that body . The rumours persisted and , three days after he resigned from the Boundary Commission , Eoin MacNeill 'resigned' (or was 'pushed' ?) from the Free State Government itself . The Brits , however , had more 'humble-pie' for their serfs in Leinster House to digest .......

A little-known clause in the ruling of the British 'Judicial Committee of the Privy Council ' came into play - this stated that the Boundary Commission was fully within its rights to continue with its brief even if it was reduced in size ie from three to two members ! The 'all new' (ie two-member) Boundary Commission then reminded the Free State President , William Cosgrave , that he had given a pledge to them , in September 1924 , that he would accept the Commission's findings , which he had because , being the 'cute hoor' Free Stater that he was , he reckoned (and was probably led to believe by the British) that the Commission would insist on no territorial change being made , which would allow the Free Staters in Leinster House to shrug their shoulders , rub their hands , fraudently claim annoyance and say - 'Ah , well , sure we tried our best ....'

But now , by all accounts , it seemed that the Free State would have to hand over some of its territory to the Six County 'State' - the 'get-out' plan was back-firing on those in Leinster House. On the 25th November 1925 , one day after Eoin MacNeill had washed his hands of the whole lot of them , Free State President William Cosgrave and Kevin O'Higgins , the Free State 'Minister for Home Affairs' , went to Downing Street , in London , where they held a meeting with the then British Prime Minister , Stanley Baldwin , and the Stormont 'Prime Minister' , 'Sir' James Craig . The Free Staters were , by this stage , in a state of controlled panic - as well the Brits knew. Eight days later (ie on 3rd December 1925) , an 'arrangement' was agreed between the Free Staters and the British - and , with the Staters being 'on-the-ropes' , Westminster done them no favours.

....... with 'their man' on the Boundary Commission (Eoin MacNeill) gone from that body (and, indeed, gone from Leinster House as well) the Free State President , William Cosgrave , and his 'Minister for Home Affairs' , Kevin O'Higgins , arrived in Downing Street in London for a meeting with British Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin and Stormont 'Prime Minister' 'Sir' James Craig - that was on the 25th November 1925 . Within nine days (ie by the 3rd December 1925) , the Free Staters had been 'sold' another 'pup' by the Brits .......

On the 3rd December 1925, all those present at a meeting (ie all those mentioned above) agreed that the 'border' , as fixed 5 years earlier in the '1920 Government of Ireland Act' and as stated in the 1921 Treaty of Surrender , would so remain , and an agreement was signed to that effect by those present. But the British , no doubt smelling fear and relief at the same time from the Free Staters , wanted more 'concessions'. They pushed for , and got , a separate agreement that the 'Council of Ireland' (a 'talking-shop' which the 1921 Treaty promised to set-up) be scraped (even though it had not, in fact, ever been established!) , and, as a final insult to the Free State muppets ,the British demanded that they repay the compensation which Westminster had paid to them for damage which the British themselves had caused in Ireland during the Black and Tan War!

And, in for a (British) penny in for a (British) pound - no doubt by now realising the 'calibre' of the men they were up against, the British also insisted , and again, got, a commitment from the Free Staters that they would continue to pay land annuities to the British Exchequer ! The British Government 'leak' of mis-information to the 'London Morning Post' newspaper (on 7th November 1925) had worked as intended ; put the fear of God into the Free Staters and paid handsome dividends to the British . That is , of course , unless you believe the Free State version of how that meeting went...... (MORE LATER).



44 YEARS AGO (1970-2014): USC ('B SPECIALS') DISBANDED.

The 'B Specials': this outfit earned recognition for being a unionist 'police force' for a unionist Six-County 'State'.

On 10th December, 1925 the A-Specials and the C-Specials were told by Westminster that they were no longer needed ; on 14th December 1925, both gangs mutinied and took hostages - two days later (on16th December 1925) the A-Specials and the C-Specials contacted Unionist leader 'Sir' James Craig and told him they wanted more money to leave their jobs. On 18th December 1925 , they were told to take the original offer or be sacked with no pay-off at all. The British knew that if they 'gave-in' to the demands of the A-Specials, the C-Specials would look for the same and the B-Specials would then in all probability look for a cash bonus as well - it had to be 'nipped in the bud'. And it was : instead of 'sticking to their guns' (!) the A-Specials all but apologised and, within twenty-four hours (ie by the 19th December , 1925) had accepted 'Sir' Craigs 'offer' of two months pay per member. They were now unemployed mercenaries.

By Christmas Day, 1925, the A-Specials and the C-Specials were no more. However, the other gang, the B-Specials, were 'beefed-up' : their numbers were increased and a new British 'law' , the 'Special Powers Act', gave them practically retrospective authority ( if an act they committed was a bit on the 'dodgy' side, the 'Act' would be invoked to cover their action).

The organised, uniformed and armed band of thugs known as the B-Specials had sprung from the ranks of the loyalist killer-gang, the 'Ulster Volunteer Force' (UVF) in 1920 ;the B-Specials carried-on as if they had never left the UVF terror-gang - pogroms against the nationalist population continued, although now the perpetrator's wore a British uniform, were paid to crack "fenian skulls" and were protected by their political masters for doing so. (MORE LATER).



ANNUAL CABHAIR TESTIMONIAL REUNION FUNCTION.

The CABHAIR organisation will pay tribute to six republican veterans in a function to be held in a Dublin hotel on Saturday next, 17th May 2014.

Since at least 1978 - when the CABHAIR organisation was known as 'An Cumann Cabhrach' (see page 14, here) - Irish Republicans have sought to officially honour those amongst them who have 'gone that extra mile' by holding an event at which such people can be presented with a small token of acknowledgement by the overall Republican Movement.

This year, six people have been chosen by the various committees involved and these will be 'wined and dined', and presented with a token of appreciation, in Dublin, on Saturday next, 17th May 2014. Frank Hanratty (Leinster),Jimmy McNulty (Munster),Tommy Cull (Connacht),Micky McGonigle (Ulster), Victor 'Vic' Sackett (USA) and Margaret Walsh (Cumann na mBan) will be treated like royalty (not!) for the evening, as they should be, and they will be left in no doubt that the contribution they make to Irish republicanism is much appreciated and valued, all year round. Congrats to one and all - ye deserve it!



ANNUAL WOLFE TONE COMMEMORATION : SUNDAY 22ND JUNE 2014, SALLINS, CO.KILDARE.



"From my earliest youth I have regarded the connection between Great Britain and Ireland as the curse of the Irish nation, and felt convinced that, while it lasted, this country could never be free nor happy. My mind has been confirmed in this opinion by the experience of every succeeding year, and the conclusions which I have drawn from every fact before my eyes. In consequence, I was determined to employ all the powers which my individual efforts could move, in order to separate the two countries. That Ireland was not able of herself to throw off the yoke, I knew ; I therefore sought for aid wherever it was to be found. In honourable poverty I rejected offers which, to a man in my circumstances , might be considered highly advantageous. I remained faithful to what I thought the cause of my country, and sought in the French Republic an ally to rescue three millions of my countrymen". -Theobald Wolfe Tone.

This annual RSF-organised commemoration will be held as stated, on Sunday 22nd June 2014, at 2.30pm, in Sallins, County Kildare, and I hope that either the chairperson or the main speaker will highlight some of the lesser-known facts in relation to what myself and others consider to be the propaganda theory that 'Tone committed suicide', an issue we wrote about on this blog in the past (see 'Murder Most Foul', here , from March 9th to March 18th - each post can be read by clicking on the 'Newer Post' button). I would try and steer the chairperson/speaker in that direction myself but I won't be here on that date. More about that later.....!



R.A. NOT A 'RA MAN , BUT A WINNING LOSER!



We'll explain that heading and pic at the end of this post, but for now we want to continue on the conversation we were suckered into on Sunday last, 11th May, involving why it was do-or-die that Liverpool had to win by more than it did and West Ham should have won, but didn't. Not to mention how that outcome affects Chelsea but wouldn't have, possibly/probably, had Everton done the business and what about Aston Villa? And, depending on who we listened to, Man City or Stoke or Swansea were the real winners on the day blah blah blah....!

And in between all that (nonsensical!) madness, myself and three other girls had to try to explain to dozens of soccer fans why it was that we had no more raffle tickets to sell (our quota of 70 were sold on the premises in the first hour!) and try to secure a 'pitch' (!) for ourselves in a quiet(er) part of the lounge. Phew! And a Mr.Philip O'Callaghan, from Cork City, was delighted that we managed to do just that - Jessica, one of the floor staff, pulled the first prize for us , stub 214, worth €200, and Philip then proceeded to make our quiet(er) corner NOISEY!! Philip wasn't on his own, and his mates , from that same city (all Liverpool supporters) made sure that he didn't 'walk alone' to the bar! Philip and his fellow Corkonians were far too busy celebrating the win, so we asked Jessie to do the honours again - and a Dub from Bluebell, Naas Road, Lar Cassins, who had bought his ticket (529) from us about two hours earlier, was the winner of our second prize, €100. And, once again, our quiet(er) corner erupted but this time we managed to 'job' the winner and Lar pulled out a ticket (286) that our Kevin, from Wexford, had sold earlier in the month to Lisa Kelly, who pocketed €40. And, because Lisa was still in Wexford, there was no decibel increase! Us Dubs struck again for the fourth prize, €20, as Mattie M, from Clondalkin, won his few bob on ticket 547, and his delightful and delighted wife, Mags, 'kept it in the family' - she pulled the fifth prize for us, ticket number 151, which was won by Alex, who bought the ticket from Owen, in Dublin city centre.

Prize number six, €20, was won (451) on the premises by a lovely little girl from Roscommon, Gemma Dolan, who then gave Pat, from Ballyfermot, in Dublin, the seventh prize of €20, on ticket 210 and Pat kept the Dubs in it - our Anto sold ticket 557 , which won the last prize of €20, to a person who signed him/herself as 'Baby Bean', thereby allowing us the above-mentioned pic intro! And that was it, workwise, anyway, although we did stay in the hotel for an hour or two afterwards, as usual, for a bite to eat and something to wash it down with! Myself and the other girls will be present as always for the next raffle - in early June - but I won't be reporting on same here. More about that later....!



AND FINALLY - TWO EVENTS WHICH MAY BE OF INTEREST TO OUR READERS :

The Ruairí Ó Brádaigh commemoration (left) takes place as advertised, following the 'Ruairí Ó Brádaigh Summer School' which will be held from Friday 6th June next to Sunday 8th, in the Abbey Hotel in Roscommon town. Details available by contacting (01)8729747 and/or 0879374277.



The 'Save Moore Street Campaign' has organised a protest for this coming Sunday, 18th May 2014, and have asked that as many people as possible turn out to show their opposition to the destruction of that historical site. If its fate is to be decided by land speculators and their employees in Leinster House, then those buildings are destined for the skip. We can at least let them know that some of us value our heritage.

Thanks for reading, Sharon.






Wednesday, May 07, 2014

BEWARE THE CABAL FROM THE DARK SIDE !

By Peadar O'Donnell ; first published in January 1963.

As is the way with all robust Irish movements, the IRA sought relations with other peoples struggling to be free, and we sent delegates to the world's anti-imperialist movements. Seán MacBride and I attended a congress at Frankfurt-on-Main, Donal O'Donoghue and Frank Ryan were our representatives at Paris and George Gilmore and Dave Fitzgerald were sent on a mission to Moscow to discuss military training for a group of IRA officers. The land annuity committee movement sent delegates to the Congress of European Small Farmers that met at Berlin in 1930.

At home, members of the Free State Army fumbled their way back to us, and Mick Price and Seán Russell kept within speaking distance of a number of Free State officers - Russell had the most fantastic friendships - but they used them more to take soundings than to make allies. Now suddenly the opportunity to make considerable inroads into the Free State forces presented itself, for the shift of opinion in the country was making itself felt through the homes of serving Free State soldiers. It was decided to organise groups, especially within the armoured and transport sections, and in many ways there was a climate of uncertain relations that reminded me of the early days of the 1922 fighting or, for that matter, the 1918 period when Hibernians were easily dragged from their moorings.

The Free State government reacted to the sharpening conflict by more active police persecution, and individual police officers with personal cause for bitterness made things difficult, and even dangerous, for themselves, for they put the discipline of local IRA units under very severe strain. Moss Twomey did trojan work in the period - he was one of the very great Fenian organisers of all time. He had around him a devoted body of fulltime officers who, as in Eoin Roe O'Neill's day, "not being mercenaries put themselves upon the country", content with shelter and food. They were a wonderful fellowship : Jim Killeen, Donal O'Donoghue, Seán Russell, Mick Price, George Gilmore, Tom Daly, Seán MacBride, Dave Fitzgerald, George Plunkett, Mick Fitzpatrick, Billy Aherne and , on the levels of brigade, battalion and company staff, countless men and women who worked through most of the hours of darkness. The units flaunted themselves at Easter commemorations. (MORE LATER).



THE ANATOMY OF AN AFTERNOON : THE STORY OF THE GIBRALTAR KILLINGS........

By Michael O'Higgins and John Waters. From 'Magill Magazine' , October 1988.

Officer 'J', who was also engaged in the surveillance operation, had followed Seán Savage when he split up from the others, because she thought she was the only member of the surveillance team to notice him. Seán Savage turned in towards the tunnel and just as he had got to the tree about twenty feet in, Officer 'J' heard the sound of gunfire from behind and almost at the same instant she heard a police siren. Savage spun round, looking "very stunned". Officer 'J' had never heard gunfire before and, as she turned away from Savage, there was a lot of noise in the earpiece in her right ear. When she turned back to Savage she saw him lying on the ground and one of the soldiers standing over him saying "Call the police". This was the first time she had been aware of the presence of Soldiers 'C' or 'D'. She did not see or hear any shots being fired.

Ms Diana Treacy, a Gibraltar bank clerk, was walking from the Landport Tunnel towards Corral Road when she passed a group of men and then, behind them, saw a man running towards her. He passed her and then she saw a second man, running awkwardly with his left hand held close to his body. He had a gun in his hand. There was a distance of about four to six feet between her and the first man and a similar distance between her and the man with the gun, who took aim and fired into the back of the other man between three and five times. She looked over her shoulder and saw the man fall onto his back. She heard no warning shouts nor saw the second gunman. She immediately ran off down Corral Road towards Laguna Estate.

Robin Mordue, a British tourist on holidays, had passed through Landport Tunnel on his way to the beach and was approaching Corral Road when he noticed a man walking towards him carrying a newspaper under his arm. When there was about six or seven feet between them, a woman passed Mordue on a bicycle and then somebody to the left of them pushed the woman back, on top of Mordue, and shouted "Stop, get down". The woman, the bicycle and Mordue fell to the ground, and Mordue heard shots and as he was falling saw the man with the newspaper falling as well. As he moved to get up there were more shots and he saw the man bleeding at the foot of a tree. There was still more shooting and Mordue went behind a car and was sick. When he emerged there was a man standing over the body with his gun clasped pointing downwards. By then the shooting had stopped. (MORE LATER).



22 IRISH REPUBLICAN HUNGER-STRIKERS REMEMBERED IN DUBLIN , SATURDAY 3RD MAY 2014.

Between the years 1917 and 1981, 22 Irish republicans died on hunger-strike.

Two of the many placards that were on display in O'Connell Street, Dublin, on Saturday 3rd May 2014, at the annual RSF hunger-strikers rally.

About two dozen Irish republican activists maintained a presence in O'Connell Street in Dublin on Saturday 3rd May 2014, from 1.45pm until 3pm, to commemorate the twenty-two Irish republicans who died on hunger-strike between 1917 and 1981.

Seán Dolan, one of the speakers at the rally.

The event was Chaired by Josephine Hayden and, before any of the main speakers took the microphone, the Role of Honour of all twenty-two hunger-strikers was read out, and a brief detail of each man was given.



A Palestinian flag was carried by one of those at the rally.

The speeches were delivered by Seán Dolan, Fergal Moore and Dermot Douglas, all of whom concentrated on various aspects of the men that died on hunger-strike during the 64-year period in question.

The main banner at the rally.

Some of the graphics that were carried on the day.

A full report and pics will be carried in the May 2014 issue of the 'Saoirse' republican newspaper (which goes to print today, Wednesday 7th May 2014) and those who organised the rally, and those who took part in it, are to be commended for doing so!



MICHEÁL MARTIN TAKES THE (WRONG) BOUNDARY COMMISSION TO TASK.

"Gerrymandering" , Mr. Martin called it : "It is the biggest attempt to manipulate election boundaries in the 35 years since Fianna Fail introduced independent Boundary Commissions...." (from here) , adding "....we saw that straight away when the terms of reference were published,that skewing was going on....".

However, a more important 'skewing' by a Boundary Commission has been ignored by Mr. Martin and his party and, indeed, by the administration and the so-called 'opposition' in Leinster House - the 'Boundary Commission' established under 'Article 12' of the 1921 'Treaty of Surrender', which was tasked with 'determining the boundaries between the newly-partitioned 6 and 26-county 'states' ' , the deliberations of which caused a mutiny within British forces in Ireland! (Part 7)

....... the 1921 Treaty of Surrender was lodged as a legal document with the 'League Of Nations' organisation in Geneva ; the Brits 'broke' that Treaty on 9th October 1924 when they took it on themselves to change Article 12 ('Boundary Commission' clause) of that Treaty. The Free Staters in Leinster House (being, of course, Free Staters!) failed to take Westminster to task for that illegal move .......

The earlier 1920 'Government of Ireland Act' (ie -two 'Home Rule Parliaments' for Ireland) was not referred to , or lodged with, the 'League Of Nations' in Geneva as "...it never purported to be an agreement between two nations .." , that is , the Brits refused to recognise the island of Ireland as a separate entity and considered that 1920 Act to be an "internal arrangement ... ". However - there was, at the time (ie when the agreed version of the Boundary Commission clause was broke , by the Brits, on 9th October 1924) a legal (if not moral) obligation and/or opportunity (and reason) for the then Free State Administration to state that the then 3 year-old Treaty of Surrender had been broken by the Brits and was therefore invalid. That they did not do so spoke volumes of their future intentions - ie 'lets be grateful we got 26 Counties back and not push our luck with the Brits .....'. Anyway - the 1921 Treaty was changed by the Brits on the 9th October 1924 and , on the 24th October 1924 , J.R. Fisher was put in place , by Westminster , to do its bidding on the Boundary Commission which , as stated here previously , held its first meeting on 6th November 1924,in London .......

Also, on 7th October 1924 (which was two days before Westminster took it on itself to 're-jig' the 1921 Treaty) 'Sir' James Craig (Stormont 'Prime Minister') had stood up in that Six-County 'parliament' and made a speech directed at Westminster : Craig was well-aware that the British would not hesitate to 'cross' their 'friends' , as well as their enemies, and he knew they were only days away from appointing a Stormont representative to the Boundary Commission ; so he 'reminded' them of where he stood - he stated in his speech that an "unfavourable" decision by the Boundary Commission would see him resign as Stormont 'Prime Minister' and take charge of at least 40,000 armed men who were of similar mind with him , and that they would not rule out any steps necessary "... to defend their territory ....." (sic). The chances are that 'Sir' Craig had already been assured by Westminster that he had nothing to fear from the Commission , but what career politician can resist an opportunity for a bit of 'grandstanding'?

Then came another 'spanner' in the Free State 'works' : on 7th November 1925 , a newspaper in London ('The London Morning Post') reported that the Boundary Commission had apparently decided that the Free State should hand over some of its territory to the (pro-British) Stormont 'parliament'! The British were 'flying a kite' , or getting their retaliation in first (!) - and it worked. The nationalist population in the Free State 'border' counties were being fed with rumours that their areas were to be 'handed-over' to Stormont in return for a couple of 'border fields' in South Fermanagh and/or South Armagh. Within four days (ie by 11th November 1925) the (first) President of the Free State, William T. Cosgrave, was trying to calm things down - he stated that the Free State would not agree to transfer any of its territory to the Stormont administration. Ten days later (ie on the 21st November 1925) , with the panic-level growing, Eoin MacNeill resigned from the Boundary Commission, a move which only fed the rumour-mill further. The British jumped in here , again, and fanned the flames by claiming that, before he had resigned, Eoin MacNeill had agreed that the Free State should cede some territory and , whats more, that MacNeill saw nothing wrong about , and had no problem with, Westminster appointing the Stormont representative to the Boundary Commission! Three days later (ie on the 24th November 1925) Eoin MacNeill, by now the centre of much 'did-he-or-did-he-not' speculation, 'resigned' from the Free State Government itself (pushed or 'resigned' ...?) but the British were not finished 'stirring' things up just yet ; they had more 'salt' and spied another Free State 'wound'....... (MORE LATER).



44 YEARS AGO (1970-2014): USC ('B SPECIALS') DISBANDED.

The 'B Specials': this outfit earned recognition for being a unionist 'police force' for a unionist Six-County 'State'.

An incident with the 'Specials', which the British would rather forget about, took place on the night of 23rd January 1921 when a fifteen-man unit of the A-Specials from Fermanagh drove to Clones in County Monaghan, broke into a pub and thrashed it.

In June 1921, the new Six-County 'state' came into existence and,by the end of that year, the Stormont regime had taken command of the (now re-named) 'police' force', the 'Royal Ulster Constabulary'(RUC). The 'Ulster Special Constabulary' were now also controlled by the Unionists in Stormont. In 1925, with the Six Counties "firmly established as a separate entity", as the British and the Free Staters would have it, there was no need to maintain the thirty-five thousand strong 'Specials' as they were then constituted. Redundancies were being discussed. Westminster (which held the purse-strings) offered a lump sum of one-million-two-hundred-thousand pounds Sterling to be divided between the A-Specials and the C-Specials - the other gang , the B-Specials ( "the cutting edge") were to be kept as they were. The 'Specials', being the mercenaries they were, turned on themselves : the B-Specials were happy enough , although a bit fretful - they wondered when their masters in Westminster would turn on them. But for now , they had a job, a 'career', which paid them well for suppressing their nationalist neighbours.

The (by now) three-thousand-five-hundred-and-fifty-three full-time A-Specials and the approximate similar number of C-Specials were told by Loyalist leader James Craig (now a British 'Sir') on 10th December 1925 that they were to be disbanded immediately and he offered them two months pay each if they would just resign. But they wanted more.

On 14th December, 1925, in Derry and Ballycastle, the A-Specials mutinied and imprisoned their own Officer Corps! Other areas followed suit. On 16th December, 1925, the A-Specials contacted 'Sir' James Craig and told him they wanted the proposed two months pay plus a two-hundred-pounds Sterling tax-free bonus for each man! On the 18th December, 1925, one of Craig's minion's, a Richard Dawson Bates, told the A-Specials that there would be no change in the original offer, and he threatened the A-Specials further by stating that if they did not accept the offer on the table they would be dismissed, sacked on the spot, with no financial 'hand-shake' at all....... (MORE LATER).


BEWARE THE CABAL FROM THE DARK SIDE....

Our EXCLUSIVE!!! pic shows lead actor Gerry 'Darth Vader' Adams being welcomed by his handlers in Antrim RUC/PSNI barracks, home of the notorious 'Dark Side Cabal' , a force-within-a-force who, in the recent past, were also known as 'The Securocrats'.

After a four day debriefing session by the 'Cabal from the Dark Side', Gerry Adams emerged through the back door of the Imperial Barracks dressed as the Crown Steward and Bailiff of the Manor of Northstead aka Darth Vader. He immediately denied suggestions that British Prime Minister David Cameron was his father and declared, contrary to recent media speculation, he was never a smoker - 'I never did chew bacco...', the Bearded Wonder said, before jumping into an Imperial Cruiser for the long trip to a galaxy far far away, where his mission is to convince a wronged people that to surrender to, and work, salaried, on behalf of the enemy, is really a 'peace process' in all but name.

Meanwhile, back on Earth, his minions carried on building monuments to their leader, removing, in the process, historical representations of 'the old days', in order that Ger's 'New Order/Party Election Campaign' be promoted. Some of the natives resisted, but Wonder Beard dismissed them as 'not having the farce with them'. Join us here again for the next episode, which might or might not contain a storyline in which Princess Lou attempts a coup......



ANOTHER 'TEAM' ENTERS THE CROWDED PITCH....

....we got a text (in two parts!) from the floor manager of the sports hotel in Kildare two days ago, advising us to come prepared on Sunday, 11th May, when we are due to take up our usual position in one of the lounges to hold our monthly raffle : as well as a good scattering of GAA hurling and football games, he told us that at least ten fairly major soccer fixtures will be held that day, with Chelsea, Crystal Palace, Everton, Liverpool, Manchester City, Arsenal , Manchester United and a good few other 'named brands' as well, all doing battle that afternoon. Which is good news for the hotel, customer-wise, and good news for us, too, as the monthly raffle has long ceased to be 'just a republican fundraiser' and now also acts as a venue where the 'Saoirse' newspaper is sold, as are republican badges, t-shirts, caps etc etc which would be grand if we didn't have to coordinate the sale and return of 650 raffle tickets as well!

But as it's for a good cause (and we have the craic at it, too!) we'll be there, as usual, to do the business : and, again as usual, we will post the list of winners etc on this blog as soon as possible after the event. But such is the workload involved (hic!) , we won't be saying when that will be...!

Thanks for reading, Sharon.