- published: 10 Jul 2013
- views: 3
- author: Abhishek Bhartia
1:58
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients by Jayco Chemical Industries, Thane
http://www.jaycochemicals.com/]Welcome to Jayco Chemical Industries, Manufacturer and Expo...
published: 10 Jul 2013
author: Abhishek Bhartia
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients by Jayco Chemical Industries, Thane
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients by Jayco Chemical Industries, Thane
http://www.jaycochemicals.com/]Welcome to Jayco Chemical Industries, Manufacturer and Exporter of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients and Advanced Intermediat...- published: 10 Jul 2013
- views: 3
- author: Abhishek Bhartia
5:48
Sympathomimetics - Direct Sympathomimetics
http://usmlefasttrack.com/?p=5040 epinephrine, norepinephrine, isoproterenol, dopamine, d...
published: 23 Oct 2013
Sympathomimetics - Direct Sympathomimetics
Sympathomimetics - Direct Sympathomimetics
http://usmlefasttrack.com/?p=5040 epinephrine, norepinephrine, isoproterenol, dopamine, dobutamine, phenylephrine, albuterol, salmeterol, terbutaline, ritodrine, Sympathomimetics, -, Direct, Sympathomimetics, Findings, symptoms, findings, causes, mnemonics, review, what is, video, study, Rapid Review, Clinical presenation, First Aid, for, USMLE, Step 1, images, wiki, define, wikipedia, 2013, videos, exam, prep, easy, What is usmle, mnemonic, causes,- published: 23 Oct 2013
- views: 8
3:41
Take Me to the LAKE!!!!
Beautiful Puppies make a difference in your life. He should have bought her a puppy.
Thi...
published: 15 Aug 2013
Take Me to the LAKE!!!!
Take Me to the LAKE!!!!
Beautiful Puppies make a difference in your life. He should have bought her a puppy. This happens to men that listen to the advice of Focus on da Family and the stable of deception artists in such stables. After last week's essay on the idealistic nature of the Quality Woman I had an interesting question arise: Rollo, I know you like to divorce humanistic and moralistic variables as much as possible from your blog and I understand why. I would like you to explain this point: "There would be a contingent of moral absolutists who would declare that it's men, by virtue of their great moral self-awareness and thus responsibility, who need to enforce controls over the socially destructive nature of hypergamy. Ironically this moral impetus is yet one more control itself to ensure hypergamy works to the benefit of those who subscribe to their moral absolutism." I understand you say that hypergamy doesn't care about moral imperatives but how would the attempt of men to enforce controls over it (which I'm not sure is entirely possible) backfire on those men? As is my standing rule, I strive for a separation of moralism and rationality on this blog, up to the point where the topic crosses over into a better rational understanding of a particular dynamic by addressing the moral element of it -- this is one such an occasion. What I'm saying is that, in the context of hypergamy, moral absolutism, religiosity, secular appeals to 'higher self' ideals,..hell, even white knightery, are all founded in a desire to control hypergamy to better fit their subscriber's perceived strengths and weaknesses in coping with hypergamy. I've written in several blog posts about how the feminine imperative would ideally strive for a set of controlled environmental conditions that favor's women's capacity to optimally satisfy their hypergamic natures (i.e. feminism, feminine-bastardized chivalry, etc). As impossible as this is in a long term sense, the feminine will exhaustively construct social dynamics it thinks change the 'rules' to favor hypergamy -- lowering the basket to better play the game, etc. Men given to moral absolute ideals, like blue pill men still plugged in, do something similar in their own mindset, and just like the feminine imperative, find themselves equally disappointed when the Rules don't change to meet their capacity to play the game. They'll disqualify women from their definition of 'quality' in the same fashion women will disqualify men as 'misogynists' when either refuse, deliberately or indifferently, to comply with what their ideal conditions predispose their beliefs for. Hypergamy isn't going to change, so if a moralist or a feminist wants to minimize or maximize hypergamy to their benefit, social and psychological schemas need to develop around what serves either the best. This is exactly why white knight beta chumps seek to define what the essence of Alpha should be in terms that best describes themselves. They seek to control hypergamy by redefining hypergamy's ideal to fit their own description -- likewise fem-centrism will seek to redefine masculinity to better fit a hypergamous ideal (Alpha Fucks/Beta Bucks in the same, or in two distinct, definitions of a man). Conditionally necessitous women will seek to redefine for men what men 'should' want in an ideal partner by defining female desirability as it pertains to themselves. Thus we get fat acceptance and a refocusing of women's intrinsic qualities as what men should prefer rather than the male-hypergamic impulse of men to be aroused by women's physical appeal. Control and Synthesis Now, all of that isn't an indictment of multiple millennias of human social progress, but rather it's to reveal the base motivator of that progress. One of the main issues I see for both genders coming to terms with the reality of Hypergamy is this want for applying humanistic / moral variables into the resolution of hypergamic problems. In other words, hypergamy doesn't care about your moral imperatives -- it exists with equal efficiency both within and without a moral context. Hypergamy has been a very uncomfortable truth of human existence since long before we had a formal name for the dynamic. Every inter-gender social convention in human history has been an attempt to either marginalize its influence, or in- published: 15 Aug 2013
- views: 31
45:12
Quantum Leap - Genesis, Part 2 - September 13, 1956
Sam Beckett (Scott Bakula), a brilliant scientist, takes part in the Quantum Leap experime...
published: 11 Sep 2013
Quantum Leap - Genesis, Part 2 - September 13, 1956
Quantum Leap - Genesis, Part 2 - September 13, 1956
Sam Beckett (Scott Bakula), a brilliant scientist, takes part in the Quantum Leap experiment which lands him in 1956 as a test pilot. With the help of his holographic "Observer" (Dean Stockwell), Sam remembers the experiment and learns that his fate is to "quantum leap" back and forth in time with the hope of returning to his own present in the conclusion of the premiere episode written by series executive producer Donald P. Bellisario and directed by David Hemmings. Part 2 of 2.- published: 11 Sep 2013
- views: 0
50:22
Prof Jane Norman - The mysteries of birth: Far from elementary, my dear Watson
Jane Norman is Professor of Maternal and Fetal Health at the University of Edinburgh and D...
published: 25 Oct 2010
author: EdinburghUniversity
Prof Jane Norman - The mysteries of birth: Far from elementary, my dear Watson
Prof Jane Norman - The mysteries of birth: Far from elementary, my dear Watson
Jane Norman is Professor of Maternal and Fetal Health at the University of Edinburgh and Director of the Tommy's Centre of Maternal and Fetal Health. Recorde...- published: 25 Oct 2010
- views: 2744
- author: EdinburghUniversity
