September 24th, 2013
Ahri TALLON

The Geographic Frontline for the Climate Movement


Over the past few years the geographical and demographic division of the political spectrum has become increasingly distinct. Although it has been evident for decades, the growth of the Greens in inner city electorates and the growth of the Katter’s Australia Party in North Queensland has made it clear that geographical lines are now also political lines. Currently the climate movements electoral support has been stunted because we have allowed the political mandate we once had to slip away unnoticed. We took the shallow support we had for granted and failed to galvanise frames for action in both progressive and conservative sides of politics. As a result it is now an imperative that we start communicating and acting on climate change in a way that resonates with all the Australians who have been unsure of the problem or critical about its solutions. We are not going to succeed in doing this unless as individual campaigners and a collective movement we can start moving beyond green enclaves and claim new territory on the front lines where these Australians live.

Growing up around Nimbin in Northern NSW gave me a childhood that made me a fervent believer in the need to build a radically progressive movement with a culture of outreach and growth. You may or may not have been to Nimbin. Many judge it purely on the strong drug culture that the town has identified itself with but some know that if you scratch through the paint a little deeper you will find a truly remarkable community that has been one of the epicentres for the environmental movement in Australia. It’s the place where permaculture first flourished, where the first solar panel shop started up and where the first forest blockade took place in Australia. The local economy works to have a restorative environmental benefit while the community operates in a way that seems closer to the sustainable future we are fighting for than any other community I have seen in Australia.

Despite the dreamy and idyllic description I am giving my beloved home and the alternative lifestyles it represents it is not the place I would like anyone reading this to pay more than an occasional visit to. Many people have moved to this place over the years to escape the often scary world we confront on a day to day basis. They were searching for a place that is more nurturing, beautiful and balanced. Growing up as frustrated activist it dawned on me that many people had unknowingly turned their back on all the work that needs to be done to ensure the whole world becomes this place.

Turning their back by forgetting their responsibility to understand and engage the parts of our society that are not concerned about our ecological future, who see our environment as something abstract to their livelihoods, health and prosperity. Who can blame them, they found a patch of heaven that made it easy to forget the hell the world is becoming. The search for such places had become reciprocal with the movements cultural tradition of focusing on alternative lifstyles and escaping from the consumer driven worlds brutality. But today after 40 years of a culture of alternativism we need to build a culture of opposition and growth that will allow us move from being the muted minority to the vocal majority.

Nimbin like many other green enclaves around Australia both regional and in the city has become a place of cultural propagation but also a refuge for our movement. These places are our hearts; where we grow strongest but also where our blood always flows back to. However, if we are truly committed to growing our movement we need to start to looking beyond our geographic centres and migrate with courage to the places where we must lay new political and cultural foundations.

Movement and activist mobility has been a crucial part of social movements throughout history. Many young student activists in the US civil rights movement dropped out of university and moved to a south-western town where racial oppression was strongest in order to confront the culture that was pervading them justice. In Austraia thousands of activists travelled during key moments to places of significance for months on end at places such as the Franklin River, the Daintree and Jabiluka to protect these national icons under threat. The Freedom rides in NSW represented the willingness of indigenous campaigners to take their message to the places where racism hit hardest. In every example there became a time where the movement needed to transcend their geographical heartland and move to the front lines of the political battle that was being fought.

Many scientists and climate commentators have often commented that to effectively mitigate climate change our country will need to dedicate its full economic power and mite to reducing emissions and restoring our environment. It has been said that this would need to be done at a scale only equal to the level of industrial and political focus that was shown during World War II when the entire country had the single focus to defend our nation. This begs the question: How are we to expect to ever get our country to a war footing on climate change if our our movement cannot get there? Our movement is currently not acting on a war-footing, so why would the rest of Australia go there either. Like the ANZAC troops who travelled to Tobruk we need organisers in the thousands who are willing to relocate their lives and their work to the to the front lines of the climate movement.  

Right now states like Queensland are crying out for climate activists. Queensland has become a stronghold of conservative power with the expansion of the coal industry at its core. It has the 2nd highest economic growth making it an increasingly powerful state in Australia’s political future. In the recent state election not only did the ALP face an unprecedented defeat but the vote of the Australian Greens also decreased overall in the state (it increased in numbers but due to population increase it decreased as a percentage of the overall state). This gives a clear indication of the political and voting trends that will continue unless we do something about it.

In the outback of North Queensland the largest expansion of coal mines in the world’s history is taking place. You may not have heard but it is estimated that the total emissions that will be released if the coal is burnt from mines such as the ‘China First Porject’ in the Galilee basin will account for 6.5% of the world’s carbon budget until 2050 on its own. This is a battle that is only just beginning. But one thing is known for sure- it wont be won without considerable energy from interstate campaigners that recognise the national and international significance of this threat.

Another consideration is that over the past ten years Queensland’s south eastern coast has undergone massive expansion of suburban communities. Through this growth Queensland has become the fastest growing state in the country. If you have visited such places like the Gold Coast or the Sunshine Coast you may join me in recognising the strong conservative values that are propagating in these expanding communities. Social isolation, media saturation, over-commercialised consumerist culture and fundamentalist religions are quickly degrading many communities ability to hold nurturant and progressive values essential for sustainable transitions. Much like in Western Sydney where over 3 million Australians live alone there are an increasing amount of places that environmentalists have refused to live and by doing so turned our back on.

But its not all about the challenge we are facing. Its also about the opportunity Queensland represents as a place that has been and will continue to be ravaged by natural disasters. In Queensland we can start talking about the direct impacts of climate change with more effect than anywhere else because here people are experiencing those impacts more than any where else. This means that if we can find a way to motivate locals to act their efforts wont just come arise from eco-centric ideology but from the oppression they are facing from the destabilisation of the earths climate. The way they identify the direct impacts upon their health, livelihoods and future will be diverse and will allow the climate movement to broaden our solidarity with the front lines of climate change like the Lock the Gate campaign has shown us is possible.

A much read and discussed article ‘Organising Cools the Planet’ by Joshua Kahn Russel and Hilary Moore talks about the importance of organisers working on climate change of finding our frontline in the work we do. They describe a frontline as ‘where an issue is fought and won, and can be seen as a place to campaign in as well as a set of issues to build power around - the more appealing your frontline is to a broad range of people, the more support your issue gets’. The purpose of this is to converge issues a number of people are talking about, and build power out of common demands. This creates a new frontline, not just climate campaigners wanting to prevent coal expansion, but also local communities seeking ownership over mine grants in their neighbourhood. A new ‘aligned’ frontline is created and a broad-base of people are involved in a campaign.

Right now the climate movement is in a tough place and if Tony Abbott wins the next election we could be yet to see our darkest hour. As the saying goes ‘the darkest hour is before the dawn’ and what better way to welcome the dawn that to move to the sun state. But like watching the dawn is best done from on top of a mountain the thought of waking up early for the hard walk to get there is often the greatest barrier to making the ascent. We know that moving to a front line will be difficult and campaigning there in a way that builds the issues and local communities into a ‘aligned’ frontline will be even harder.

Yet there will probably not be a better time than now. Queensland is ripe for the picking with mine proposals left, right and centre, a over powered conservative government, some of the worlds natural wonders on its door step and a whole lot of potentially angry citizens. It may be the best opportunity the climate movement has in Australia to put a lid on coal and align our values and call to action with the natural and rightly so self interested conservative in every Australian.

To me growing up in the hippiest area in Australia has made me want to run away from it in order to reach all the people that never came to witness the vision for the world it has given me. This means finding a front line in places some times close and some times far away. I am only just beginning but i wanted to share these thoughts with you because its something i think all of us are going to have to start doing sooner or later if we want to stop winning battles and start winning the war.

So ask yourself the question do you have the resources and courage to move to a place that may not feel like home but is begging for you to do the work to make it a place of community, environmental sanity and resilience. A place we can call home. Then maybe one day we maybe be able to call everywhere our home.


September 24th, 2013
Steve

Stand up to the coal bullies!

Residents, farmers, environmentalists, and community groups will rally outside the NSW Supreme Court next Wednesday 14th August, to oppose draconian new amendments to NSW mining regulations, and to support the people of Bulga, in the Hunter Valley, as they battle to save their town from open cut coal mining.

The O’Farrell Government has joined global mining giant Rio Tinto in a Supreme Court action to force an unwanted open cut coal mine onto the residents of Bulga. The Warkworth Extension mine proposal was previously rejected by a NSW court, due to the unacceptable impacts it would have on public health, threatened bushland, and the ongoing viability of the village of Bulga. The court found that the impacts of the proposed mine far outweighed the economic benefits promised by the mining company. But Rio Tinto and the NSW Government have refused to accept the umpire’s decision, and are now dragging the Bulga residents’ group into the Supreme Court to get their way.

The O’Farrell Govt has responded to the Bulga residents’ previous court victory by proposing draconian new mining regulations that would prevent any court from making the same decision again. A proposed amendment to the NSW Mining SEPP (State Environmental Planning Policy) would make it a legal requirement for all approval authorities to prioritise development of “significant resources” of coal over other considerations, such as protecting land and water resources, safeguarding human health, and protecting biodiversity. The proposed SEPP amendment would have far-reaching consequences for any community or industry attempting to protect itself from coal mining. It must be stopped.

These moves by the O’Farrell Government and Rio Tinto are new low points in a widespread campaign of bullying and intimidation by Big Coal against communities. Across NSW, people are tired of being bullied. Mining companies routinely lie to landholders, intimidate communities, and threaten legal action against anyone who would hinder or speak out against them. Coal companies have shown they will do anything to get their way, and the O’Farrell Government has shown they will do anything to help them, including changing the law, and taking local residents groups to court.

Barry O’Farrell was elected to power after promising to restore some balance between the public interest and the coal lobby’s interests. “No ifs, no buts – a guarantee”, he said. That promise is now in tatters. The O’Farrell Government is doing the exact opposite of what it promised. It is behaving like the hired goon of the mining industry.

It’s time to stand up against the bullies. Join the rally outside the NSW Supreme Court as the Bulga case begins – 9am Wednesday 14th August. 

For more information contact Steve Phillips, Hunter regional coordinator for Lock The Gate:sjphillips@fastmail.fm


September 24th, 2013
asenincubate

UQ students build a community garden

While The University of Queensland has a long-running history of promoting and practicing sustainable living, students have taken matters one step further, forming the University’s first ever student-led community garden.

Although the community garden has only been in development since August last year, the project is quickly gaining momentum, attracting members from varying disciplines across the University.


March 11th, 2013
Sally

In February this year, the University of Sydney appointed a new Chancellor, Belinda Hutchinson. This appointment opens the door to the mining industry on our campus and reflects the neoliberal orientation of our education system. Ms Hutchinson is currently a director of one of Australia’s largest companies. AGL makes its money through coal seam gas extraction, a technology that threatens Australia’s productive farmland, fractures our waterways and underground aquifers and pours climate-change-causing methane into the air in large quantities. It is a corruption of a public office for Ms Hutchinson to remain a director of AGL whilst also directing the interests of our supposedly independent University.

Ms Hutchinson is also a former director of the Centre for Independent Studies, a right wing think tank that churns out neoliberal ideas for business interests. With her at the helm we can be assured that our education will be geared to make profit. That means more deals to do research and courses for the mining companies that are undermining our health and our climate. Sydney Uni already carries out research for Rio Tinto, Origin Energy and Exxon Mobil.

Our public institutions should be carrying out research and training in the public interests, not in the interests of big business. That’s why the Student Environment Action Collective is keen to get on board the Australian Student Environment Network campaign to Lock the Campus against coal and gas companies. As students, we have the power to demand that our universities stop supporting the mining industries that are ruining the health of our communities and our planet. We will fight to make our public universities prioritise renewable energy and sustainable communities over corporate profits.

For more information see:

www.smh.com.au/business/choice-of-sydney-university-leader-shifts-the-debate-to-profit-and-loss-20130205-2dwi2.html
www.lockthecampus.org
www.sydneyunienviro.org


March 11th, 2013
Else

CSG coming to a backyard near you!

We’re standing on the edge of a quarry. At the far wall my eyes travel up through a dissection of the earth’s first 50m, layers of shale, sandstone and earth in shades of grey, yellow and brown. Atop the hill, grey-green against the fields and the sky is a gas plant, the central point of a new generation of resource extraction South West of Sydney, sucking gas from drills up to 4km underground in a radius of 100km around the plant.

The Camden gas fields are 66 well sites spread across a 160 square kilometer area in northern Campbelltown and Camden, traversing the Nepean river and both residential and rural properties. The gas field is believed to be Australia’s first coal seam gas drilling project in residential areas. The suburbs of Kearns, Currans Hill, Raby, Eschol Park, Varroville and Gregory Hills could have wells in their backyards.

House and land packages are currently on sale in the freshly developed suburb of Gregory Hills. Never-been-slept-in homes on Freedom, Explorer and Voyager streets are fetchingly displayed with warm, homely lights against a backdrop of sunset and twilight skies at realestate.com.au for an average of $500 000. Formerly St Gregory’s College Farm, a Marist Brothers boys farming school, the new housing development at Gregory Hills advertises a suburb “overflowing with opportunities to enjoy the outdoors (with) a modern village at its heart”[i]. But they are apparently not advertising the proposed gas drill next door, with many residents unaware of the proposal when they bought their properties. Steven Maharaj, commenting on an opinion piece in the Macarthur Chronicle, writes “Iam about to sign on land release at gergory hills,paid 15k depoist.due to gas mining can i get my money back?(sic)”

The gas drills, many of them sample sites, appear relatively innocuous on first inspection. The ones in operation are about the size of a school hall, with fencing that can be peered through to see the drills, storage containers and office ‘donger’. They are manned 24/7, and at night time a security guard in shorts and a t-shirt who describes his main task as looking out for graffiti kids, watches over the site.

However on Sunday AGL broke its pledge to not use fracking, a technique used to create fractures deep underground, in the Sydney suburbs. Fracking is a risky and damaging gas-mining technique that allows gas to travel more easily from the rock pores to the production well. In order to create fractures, a mixture of water, proppants and chemicals are pumped into the rock or coal formation at high pressure. This practice is highly controversial as gases can make their way to the surface endangering human health; aquifers can be irreparably damaged; and water sources contaminated. AGL’s promise not to frack was backed by Premier, Barry O’Farrell, who said the plan was to “horizontally drill under people’s homes”[ii]

Not only are the gas fields next door to residential areas, they are nearby educational institutions, railway lines and water catchments. The day before our visit to the drill sites, on Sydney’s record-breaking 46* day, a freight train had ignited a bushfire that reached within 50m of an operational drill site wedged between UWS Cambelltown campus and the railway line. Two exploration drills were just 200m from the Nepean River, buffered only by porous sandstone.

The campaign against the Camden gas fields is just one front of a battle that is taking place across the country. Around the Campbelltown area, BHP has learnt from Lock the Gate tactics and bought up large tracts of land. Yet the gas field’s proximity to the city and to residential areas may prove to be this campaign’s greatest strength. While the threat of mining pollution is easy to ignore when it’s a long way from home, a NIMBY mentality may prove a great asset to the fight again CSG in South West Sydney, since the industry is reliant on backyards across the region for its gas.



[i] Gregoryhills.com.au

[ii] Andrew Moore interviews NSW Premier about a range of topics including coal seam gas. 2GB, Wednesday January 2, 2013.


March 11th, 2013
Various sources

Roadtrip for Change to Lizard’s Revenge

Lizard's RevengePort Augusta PresentationRoadtrip

Point Lowly


March 6th, 2013
asenincubate

The David and Goliath tale of Civil Society and Big Coal in the Land of Plutocratic Turbo-Capitalism

By Chris P.image

If there was one take-home memo from #occupy it was that ‘representative democracy’ in the United States, indeed of much of the world, is no longer representative, nor democratic, if ever it was. The idea that “representative” democracyis capable of delivering an equal say to equal people has become a farce so blatant it’s a real surprise more aren’t calling the omnipresent political spade that which it actually is by definition: a representative Plutocracy.

plutocracy |pluːˈtɒkrəsi|
noun ( pl. plutocracies ) [ mass noun ]
government by the wealthy.
• [ count noun ] a state or society governed by the wealthy.
• [ count noun ] an elite or ruling class whose power derives from their wealth.

The two fundamental laws of Representative Plutocracy are

  1. The more money you have, the more say you have in government; and

ii. the more say you have in government, the more money you make

With fundamental rules such as these, why would you want anything but perpetual growth? Big fossil fuel corporations have obviously been playing this game for quite some time. Oxfam’s report to the World Economic Forum in Davos this year shows that, generally speaking, the richest 1 percent of America has doubled its share of national income from 10% to 20% since 1980, and the top 0.01 percent has quadrupled its share of national income, reaching never-before seen levels of wealth (and consequent political clout) [1]. And it’s not just money flowing from the world of private gain to that of ‘public’ governance; it’s people and vested interests (they who killed the electric car and who took the world to war in Afghanistan, and in Iraq, etc, etc. [2])

History is showing that a long enough run of US brand “representative democracy” begins to look a lot like a pyramid. An extremely heavy golden-top plated pyramid with shit for base. The top wealth percentile benefited beyond belief from the most recent crash; everyone else got a mortgage default, became homeless, or lost their super. A system that boasts 18.6 million vacant properties alongside 3.5 million homeless is clearly not just broken, but frighteningly, stupidly, arrogantly broken [3]. The ‘finance industry’ gets bailed out, in order that it can then buy up everyone’s property in a depressed market, it orchestrated, at fire sale prices [4]. Land was once upon a time privatised through violence, now they orchestrate to continuously sell it back to a population in debt servitude. Access to unused, vacant homes is called trespass, not self-preservation in pursuit of a right to housing.


Self-organisation by communities has historically been the go-to response to plutocratic oppression and trickery. Now, like before, when so much plutocratic wealth and power derives from the capacity to destroy the biosphere and maim humankind’s collective future, it’s no surprise to see the historically recurrent behaviour. Alongside civil society groups defending a right to shelter over and above a right to bank or speculate, through squatting vacant bank and investment fund owned property [5], (and the police who refuse to evict them [6]), another emergent movement has quietly been stopping the expansion of the US coal industry.

As the stalling of the Federal government’s attempt to do anything even worth whimpering about climate change showed (the death of the Cap-and-Trade Bill in July 2010), Washington may well try to do good things in the public interest, but because of the aforementioned ‘way the world works’ (now, there) it cannot help but fail miserably in the face of wealthy vested interests. Ce la vie.

But despite all the mainstream political ballyhoo, and the estimated $100 million mainstream green groups had invested into the plutocratic sinkhole of a campaign for legislative action, a parallel story of success was unfolding outside of Washington, across the entire country. The grass-roots campaign Beyond Coal, which by the same time the Cap and trade Bill was sunk, had already helped prevent the construction of 132 new coal plants and which was close to preventing dozens more from opening, was achieving across the country what could not be done in Washington [7].

To date, the Beyond Coal campaign has stopped two-thirds of 249 new coal plant proposals, preventing more than 654 million metric tons of carbon from being spewed into the atmosphere each year [8]. Since 2001, only 23 of the proposals for new coal-burning plants have gone ahead; 167 in total have been stopped.

To be sure, the activists had help. The recession that provoked Occupy also caused electricity demand to plummet, as did a shift to more energy-efficient appliances, motors, and industrial processes [9]. Why build a power plant, coal or otherwise, if demand doesn’t justify it? Coal was also hurt by its own rising costs—especially as natural gas, its chief competitor, stayed relatively cheap [10]. Similarly in Australia Michael Liebreich, chief executive of Bloomberg New Energy Finance, has just proclaimed“[t]he perception that fossil fuels are cheap and renewables are expensive is now out of date” [11]. “The fact that wind power is now cheaper than coal and gas in a country with some of the world’s best fossil fuel resources shows that clean energy is a game changer which promises to turn the economics of power systems on its head.”

But those economic trends in the US only made coal somewhat vulnerable. Campaigners and organisers say it was grassroots activism that leveraged vulnerability into outright defeat [12]. As the (timeless) story goes, the Beyond Coal movement’s strength was grounded in retail politics—people talking with friends and neighbours, pestering local media, packing regulatory hearings, protesting before state legislatures, filing legal challenges, and more. The movement had no official membership rolls; it was populated by a broad cross-section of clean energy advocates, public health professionals, community organisers, faith leaders, farmers, attorneys and students.

And now here’s the telling anomaly, and an interesting insight into the dynamic concerning grassroots vs institutional political action and plutocratic power. After word began to spread of Beyond Coal’s successas an archetypal ‘ground-up’ social-political movement, one of America’s most notorious plutocrats made the decision to get behind the campaign with the explicit goal of shutting down a third of the country’s 580 existing coal plants by 2020. Michael Bloomberg, the mayor of New York City, made his fortune facilitating Wall Street’s transition to the electronic age; the provision of electronic trading and analysis services to turbocharge the movement of speculative capital in the new virtual and volatile high-speed market reality. But whilst the nuances of structural inequality as a result of wealth (not value) generation from casino-capitalist trading befall Bloomberg (after announcing his decision to evict occupiers of Zucotti park, he said they must now occupy the space ‘with the power of their arguments’ [13]), he is a man really sold on the awfulness of coal. Bloomberg New Energy Finance Australia are the ones proclaiming the unlikelihood of any new coal powered-stations being built in Australia, according to their own energy production cost modelling [14].

In public Bloomberg himself is also known to wax lyrical about his concern for coal. “Every year, coal-burning power plants … cause more than 200,000 asthma attacks nationwide, many of them affecting children. Coal pollution also kills 13,000 people every year and costs us $100 billion in medical expenses. Thirteen thousand people, from something that’s planned. And it’s going to happen again next year and the year after, unless we do something about it.” Booms and Busts causing economic depression for the bottom 80% are also effectively orchestrated, if not publicly planned, and they too will keep happening, cycle after cycle, unless we do something about that. But every good plutocrat worth their weight in public perception needs a public interest hobbyhorse.

Assuming Michael Bloomberg is a man who wants value for his money, the strategy of funding a loose-knit network of political activists and community organisers with a not-insignificant amount of personal funds proves exactly the point Zucotti park occupiers were making: You Don’t Get Shit Done in the Genuine Public Interest Through Washington in a Plutocratic System: it’s a waste of time and money for everyone other than the existing Pharaohs. And in the event that those residing in the Golden tip do want genuine non-privileged/non-vested interest outcomes ‘for the people’, it pays to pay ‘the people’ themselves to have it happen. Even (especially) in the land of turbo-capitalism, “good money” is better spent on local-level campaigns and coordination, rather than capital lobbying, if it’s effective public results you’re after. The short account of how the US plutocracy got so bad is worth knowing [15]; warnings about how Australia is likely to continue down the same path are also [16]. Whatever the established or emerging plutocracy, it’s the grassroots which can be expected to look out, and act on the real public interest. The novel thing is that money talks, and that’s what it’s now saying too.

[1] http://rt.com/news/oxfam-report-global-inequality-357/

[2] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bTHsTCBxDM8

[3] http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x7725336#7725467

[4] http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-07-19/business/sns-rt-us-usa-housing-goldmanbre86i1aj-20120719_1_fundamental-reo-access-fund-mortgage-chief-plans-home-fund

[5] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laura-gottesdiener/grabbing-the-boltcutters-_b_1513594.html?ref=fb&src=sp&mimi=1&comm_ref=false

[6] http://www.occupypolice.org/2011/11/30/taking-a-stand-sheriff-refuses-to-evict-a-103-year-old-woman-from-her-home-ows-ocpo/

[7] http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2012/04/map-american-coal-plants

[8] http://content.sierraclub.org/coal/

[9] http://www.eenews.net/public/climatewire/2009/10/29/1

[10] http://205.254.135.24/forecasts/steo/report/natgas.cfm

[11] http://reneweconomy.com.au/2013/renewables-now-cheaper-than-coal-and-gas-in-australia-62268

[12] http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2012/04/beyond-coal-plant-activism

[13] http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/nov/15/michael-bloomberg-statement-zuccotti-park

[14] http://www.watoday.com.au/business/carbon-economy/rising-risk-prices-out-new-coalfired-plants-report-20130207-2e0s4.html

[15] http://www.smh.com.au/business/the-four-business-gangs-that-run-the-us-20121230-2c1e2.html

[16] http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/the-four-industries-that-rule-australia-20130205-2dwew.html


November 6th, 2012
Alex McInnis

The coal mines of Leard State Forest, NSW

After an hour of searching

through wattle and gum,

here’s the break in the fence-

here we’ve found the thin edge

where the forest 

drops out into 

blue sky and dust,

where we dig ever deeper

in mineral lust

 

From this height

it’s a theatre

of industrial might,

a stage for our reasons

to stand in the light-

we examine them each

in the magnified glare

of once fertile soil

that’s now been stripped bare

 

It’s a show staring greed

masqueraded as need,

feat. invasion, coercion,

compliance- the seed

that was planted when ‘value’

was stripped from the land,

to live in the palm

of an invisible hand-

not guided by Country,

it bows to Demand

(of it’s own fabrication!)

grips the throat of our nation,

cuts airways and limbs

til a whole generation

is left paralysed,

our mouths hanging open

we watch the tide rise,

and the hand keeps force feeding

those few ‘lucky’ mouths,

but it brews its own poison

in the pit of our bowels,

and its spat and its thrown

and its spilt down our cheeks,

it’s a rage that keeps growing

as we watch them reap

from the hope we had pinned

on our lucky star,

cause we’re told from the start

just how lucky we are,

so convinced that it’s luck

when its clearly design

that while we keep on growing

all others decline.

 

What a strange euphemism

to side-step the fact

what comes out of that hole

is set to come back,

cause the trade winds will blow

consequence to our shores

and that’s where our design

is so fatally flawed.


Loading tweets...

@ASENenviro

Likes

The Australian Student Environment Network (ASEN) links up campus environment collectives from all across the continent, and is committed to supporting grassroots movements for social and environmental justice. We acknowledge the Traditional owners of this land, and seek to work in solidarity with Aboriginal struggles for sovereignty and protection of country. This tumblr is maintained by an open editorial collective and we encourage contributions from all ASEN members and supporters. Contact us via our networks (below)

Following