Conscription

Conscription is the compulsory enrollment of people to some sort of national service, most often military service. Conscription dates back to antiquity and continues in some countries to the present day under various names. The modern system of near-universal national conscription for young men dates to the French Revolution in the 1790s, where it became the basis of a very large and powerful military. Most European nations later copied the system in peacetime, so that men at a certain age would serve 1–3 years on active duty, then transfer to the reserve force.

Conscription can be controversial, because of conscientious objection to service, or political objection to service for a disliked government, or an unpopular war. Those conscripted may evade service, sometimes by leaving the country. Some selection systems accommodate these situations by providing alternative service outside of typical combat-operations roles or even outside of the military, such as Zivildienst in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.

As of the early 21st century, many nations no longer conscript soldiers, relying instead upon professional militaries with volunteers enlisted to meet the demand for troops. The ability to rely on such an arrangement, however, presupposes some degree of predictability with regards to both war-fighting requirements and the scope of hostilities. Many nations that have abolished conscription therefore still reserve the power to resume it during wartime or times of crisis. In the United States, conscription, also called "the draft", ended in 1973, but males between 18 and 25 are required to register with the Selective Service System to aid in resuming conscription.

History

Ilkum

Around the reign of Hammurabi (1792-1750 BCE), the Babylonian Empire used a system of conscription called Ilkum. Under the system those eligible were required to serve in the royal army in time of war.

Various forms of avoiding military service are recorded. While it was outlawed by the Code of Hammurabi, the hiring of substitutes appears to have been practiced both before and after the creation of the code.

Medieval levies

Under the feudal conditions for holding land in the medieval period, most peasants and freemen were liable to provide one man of suitable age per family for military duty when required by either the king or the local lord. The levies raised in this way fought as infantry under local superiors. Although the exact laws varied greatly depending on the country and the period, generally these levies were only obliged to fight for one to three months. Most were subsistence farmers, and it was in everyone's interest to send the men home for harvest-time.

In medieval Scandinavia the 'leiðangr' (Old Norse), 'leidang' (Norwegian), 'leding', (Danish), 'ledung' (Swedish), 'lichting' (Dutch), 'expeditio' (Latin) or sometimes 'lething' (Old English), was a levy of free farmers conscripted into coastal fleets for seasonal excursions and in defence of the realm.

The bulk of the Anglo-Saxon English army, called the fyrd, was composed of part-time English soldiers drawn from the landowning minor nobility. These thegns were the land-holding aristocracy of the time and were required to serve with their own armour and weapons for a certain number of days each year. The historian David Sturdy has cautioned about regarding the fyrd as a precursor to a modern national army composed of all ranks of society, describing it as a "ridiculous fantasy":

The persistent old belief that peasants and small farmers gathered to form a national army or fyrd is a strange delusion dreamt up by antiquarians in the late eighteenth or early nineteenth centuries to justify universal military conscription.

Military slavery

The system of military slaves was widely used in the Middle East, beginning with the Egyptians training Mamluks from the 9th century, to the Turks and Ottoman Empire through the 19th century.

In the middle of the 14th century, Ottoman Sultan Murad I developed personal troops to be loyal to him, with a slave army called the Kapıkulu. The new force was built by taking Christian children from newly conquered lands, especially from the far areas of his empire, in a system known as the devşirme (translated "gathering" or "converting"). The captive children were persuaded to convert to Islam. The Sultans had the young boys trained over several years. Those who showed special promise in fighting skills were trained in advanced warrior skills, put into the sultan's personal service, and turned into the Janissaries, the elite branch of the Kapıkulu. A number of distinguished military commanders of the Ottomans, and most of the imperial administrators and upper-level officials of the Empire, such as Pargalı İbrahim Pasha and Sokollu Mehmet Paşa, were recruited in this way. By 1609 the Sultan's Kapıkulu forces increased to about 100,000.

In later years, Sultans turned to the Barbary Pirates to supply their Jannissaries corps. Their attacks on ships off the coast of Africa or in the Mediterranean, and subsequent capture of able bodied men for ransom or sale provided some captives for the Sultan's system. Starting in the 17th century, Christian families living under the Ottoman rule began to submit their sons into the Kapikulu system willingly, as they saw this as a potentially invaluable career opportunity for their children. Eventually the Sultan turned to foreign volunteers from the warrior clans of Circassians in southern Russia to fill his Janissary armies. As a whole the system began to break down, the loyalty of the Jannissaries became increasingly suspect. Mahmud II forcibly disbanded the Janissary corps in 1826.

Similar to the Janissaries in origin and means of development were the Mamluks of Egypt in the Middle Ages. The Mamluks were usually captive non-Muslim Iranian and Turkish children who had been kidnapped or bought as slaves from the Barbary coasts. The Egyptians assimilated and trained the boys and young men to become Islamic soldiers who served the Muslim caliphs and the Ayyubid sultans during the Middle Ages. The first mamluks served the Abbasid caliphs in 9th century Baghdad. Over time they became a powerful military caste. On more than one occasion, they seized power, for example, ruling Egypt from 1250–1517.

From 1250 Egypt had been ruled by the Bahri dynasty of Kipchak origin. Slaves from the Caucasus served in the army and formed an elite corp of troops. They eventually revolted in Egypt to form the Burgi dynasty. The Mamluks' excellent fighting abilities, massed Islamic armies, and overwhelming numbers succeeded in overcoming the Christian Crusader fortresses in the Holy Land. The Mamluks were the most successful defense against the Mongol Ilkhanate of Persia and Iraq from entering Egypt.

On the western coast of Africa, Berber Muslims captured non-Muslims to put to work as laborers. They generally converted the younger people to Islam and many became quite assimilated. In Morocco, the Berber looked south rather than north. The Moroccan Sultan Moulay Ismail, called "the Bloodthirsty" (1672–1727), employed a corps of 150,000 black slaves, called his Black Guard. He used them to coerce the country into submission.

Invention of modern conscription

Modern conscription, the massed military enlistment of national citizens (today recognized in the USA as "the draft"), was devised during the French Revolution, to enable the Republic to defend itself from the attacks of European monarchies. Deputy Jean-Baptiste Jourdan gave its name to the September 5, 1798 Act, whose first article stated: "Any Frenchman is a soldier and owes himself to the defense of the nation." It enabled the creation of the Grande Armée, what Napoleon Bonaparte called "the nation in arms," which overwhelmed European professional armies that often numbered only into the low tens of thousands. More than 2.6 million men were inducted into the French military in this way between the years 1800 and 1813.

The defeat of the Prussian Army in particular shocked the Prussian establishment, which had believed it was invincible after the victories of Frederick the Great. The Prussians were used to relying on superior organization and tactical factors such as order of battle to focus superior troops against inferior ones. Given approximately equivalent forces, as was generally the case with professional armies, these factors showed considerable importance. However, they became considerably less important when the Prussian armies faced forces that outnumbered their own in some cases by more than ten to one. Scharnhorst advocated adopting the levée en masse, the military conscription used by France. The Krümpersystem was the beginning of short-term compulsory service in Prussia, as opposed to the long-term conscription previously used.

In the Russian Empire, the military service time "owed" by serfs was 25 years at the beginning of the 19th century. In 1834 it was decreased to 20 years. The recruits were to be not younger than 17 and not older than 35. In 1874 Russia introduced universal conscription in the modern pattern, an innovation only made possible by the abolition of serfdom in 1861. New military law decreed that all male Russian subjects, when they reached the age of 20, were eligible to serve in the military for six years.

World Wars

The range of eligible ages for conscripting was expanded to meet national demand during the World Wars. In the United States, the Selective Service System drafted men for World War I initially in an age range from 21 to 30 but expanded its eligibility in 1918 to an age range of 18 to 45. In the case of a widespread mobilization of forces where service includes homefront defense, ages of conscripts may range much higher, with the oldest conscripts serving in roles requiring lesser mobility. Expanded-age conscription was common during the Second World War: in Britain, it was commonly known as "call-up" and extended to age 55. Nazi Germany termed it Volkssturm ("People's Storm") and included men as young as 16 and as old as 60.

Britain

Britain introduced conscription for the first time in 1916-1920, and again 1939-1958. In all, 8,000,000 men were drafted, as well as several hundred thousand women. The introduction of conscription in April 1939, before the war began, was largely due to pressure from the French, who emphasized the need for a large British army to oppose the Germans. Starting in early 1942 unmarried women age 19-30 were conscripted. Most were sent to the factories, but they could volunteer for the Auxiliary Territorial Service (ATS) and other women's services. None were assigned to combat roles unless they volunteered. By 1943 women were conscripted up to age 51. During the Second World War, 1.4 million British men volunteered for service and 3.2 million were conscripted. Volunteers comprised 20% per cent of the Army, 40% of the Royal Navy, and 50% of the Royal Air Force.

United States

Colonial and Early National

In America before 1862, combat duty was always voluntary, but white men aged 18 to 45 were usually required to join local militia units. Colonial militia laws—and after 1776 those of the states—required able-bodied white men to enroll in the militia and to undergo a minimum of military training, all without pay. Colonial Pennsylvania (controlled by Quakers) did not have such laws. Members of pacifist religious denominations were exempt. When combat troops were needed some of the militiamen volunteered for short terms of service, for which they were paid. Following this system in its essentials, the Continental Congress in 1778 recommended that the states draft men from their militias for one year's service in the Continental army; this first national conscription was irregularly applied and failed to fill the Continental ranks.

In 1814, President James Madison proposed conscription of 40,000 men for the army, but the War of 1812 ended before Congress took any action. An 1840 proposal for a standing army of 200,000 men included conscription never passed and military service was voluntary before 1862.

Civil War

Although both North and South resorted to conscription during the Civil War, in neither nation did the system work effectively. The Confederate congress on Apr. 16, 1862, passed an act requiring military service for three years from all males aged eighteen to thirty-five not legally exempt, and it later extended the obligation. The U.S. Congress followed on July 17, 1862, with an act authorizing a militia draft within a state when it could not meet its quota with volunteers. This state-administered system failed in practice and on Mar. 3, 1863, Congress passed the first genuine national conscription law, setting up under the Union army an elaborate machinery for enrolling and drafting men between twenty and forty-five years of age.

Quotas were assigned in each state, the deficiencies in volunteers to be met by conscription. But men drafted could provide substitutes or, until mid-1864, avoid service by paying commutation money. Many eligibles pooled their money to cover the cost of anyone drafted. Families used the substitute provision to select which man should go into the army and which should stay home. There was much evasion and overt resistance to the draft, especially in Catholic areas. The great draft riot in New York City in July 1863 involved Irish immigrants who had been signed up as citizens to swell the machine vote, not realizing it made them liable for the draft. Of the 168,649 men procured for the Union through the draft, 117,986 were substitutes, leaving only 50,663 who had their personal services conscripted.

The problem of Confederate desertion was aggravated by the inequitable inclinations of conscription officers and local judges. The three conscription acts of the Confederacy exempted certain categories, most notably the planter class, and enrolling officers and local judges often practiced favoritism, sometimes accepting bribes. Attempts to effectively deal with the issue were frustrated by conflict between state and local governments on the one hand and the national government of the Confederacy.

World War I

In 1917 the administration of Woodrow Wilson decided to rely primarily on conscription, rather than voluntary enlistment, to raise military manpower for World War I. The Selective Service Act of 1917 was carefully drawn to remedy the defects in the Civil War system and—by allowing exemptions for dependency, essential occupations, and religious scruples—to place each man in his proper niche in a national war effort. The act established a "liability for military service of all male citizens"; authorized a selective draft of all those between twenty-one and thirty-one years of age (later from eighteen to forty-five); and prohibited all forms of bounties, substitutions, or purchase of exemptions. Administration was entrusted to local boards composed of leading civilians in each community. These boards issued draft calls in order of numbers drawn in a national lottery and determined exemptions. In 1917 and 1918 some 24 million men were registered and nearly 3 million inducted into the military services, with little of the resistance that characterized the Civil War.

World War II

In 1940 Congress passed the first peace-time draft legislation, which was led by Grenville Clark. It was renewed (by one vote) in summer 1941. It involved questions as to who should control the draft, the size of the army, and the need for deferments. The system worked through local draft boards comprising community leaders who were given quotas and then decided how to fill them. There was very little draft resistance.

The nation went from a surplus manpower pool with high unemployment and relief in 1940 to a severe manpower shortage by 1943. Industry realized that the Army urgently desired production of essential war materials and foodstuffs more than soldiers. (Large numbers of soldiers were not used until the invasion of Europe in summer 1944.) In 1940-43 the Army often transferred soldiers to civilian status in the Enlisted Reserve Corps in order to increase production. Those transferred would return to work in essential industry, although they could be called back to active duty if the Army needed them. Others were discharged if their civilian work was deemed absolutely essential. There were instances of mass releases of men to increase production in various industries. Blacks and Asians were drafted under the same terms as whites. There was talk of a draft of women nurses in 1945, but nothing came of it.

One contentious issue involved the drafting of fathers, which was avoided as much as possible. The drafting of 18-year olds was desired by the military but vetoed by public opinion. Farmers demanded and were generally given occupational deferments (many volunteered anyway, and those who stayed at home were not eligible for postwar veteran's benefits).

Later in the war, in light of the tremendous amount of manpower that would be necessary for the invasion of France, many earlier deferment categories became draft eligible.

Recent

On July 15, 2010, Congressman Charles B. Rangel, a Korean War veteran, introduced H.R. 5741 which if passed would "require all persons in the United States between the ages of 18 and 42 to perform national service, either as a member of the uniformed services or in civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security."

Drafting of women

, countries that were drafting women into military service included Benin, Chad China, Cuba, Eritrea, Israel, Libya, Malaysia, Peru, Côte d'Ivoire, and Mongolia, In the United Kingdom during World War II, beginning in 1941, women were brought into the scope of conscription but, as all women with dependent children were exempt and many women were informally left in occupations such as nursing or teaching, the number conscripted was relatively few.

In the USSR, there was no systematic conscription of women for the armed forces, but the severe disruption of normal life and the high proportion of civilians affected by World War II after the German invasion attracted many volunteers for what was termed "The Great Patriotic War". Medical doctors of both genders could and would be conscripted (as officers). Also, the free Soviet university education system required Department of Chemistry students of both sexes to complete an ROTC course in NBC defense, and such female reservist officers could be conscripted in times of war. The United States came close to drafting women into the Nurse Corps in preparation for a planned invasion of Japan.

In 1981 in the United States, several men filed lawsuit in the case Rostker v. Goldberg, alleging that the Selective Service Act of 1948 violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment by only requiring that men register with the Selective Service System (SSS). The Supreme Court eventually upheld the Act, stating that "the argument for registering women was based on considerations of equity, but Congress was entitled, in the exercise of its constitutional powers, to focus on the question of military need, rather than 'equity.'"

On October 1, 1999 in the Taiwan Area, the Judicial Yuan of the Republic of China in its Interpretation 490 considered that the physical differences between males and females and the derived role differentiation in their respective social functions and lives would not make drafting males only violating the Constitution of the Republic of China. Though women are conscripted in Taiwan, transsexual persons are exempt.

Traditionally conscription has been limited to the male population. Women and handicapped males have been exempted from conscription. Many societies have traditionally considered military service as a test of manhood and a rite of passage from boyhood into manhood.

Conscientious objection

A conscientious objector is an individual whose personal beliefs are incompatible with military service, or sometimes with any role in the armed forces. In some countries, conscientious objectors have special legal status, which augments their conscription duties. For example, Sweden used to allow conscientious objectors to choose a service in the "weapons-free" branch, such as an airport fireman, nurse or telecommunications technician.

Some may also refuse such service as they feel that they still are a part of the military complex. The reasons for refusing to serve are varied. Some conscientious objectors are so for religious reasons — notably, the members of the historic peace churches are pacifist by doctrine, and Jehovah's Witnesses, while not strictly speaking pacifists, refuse to participate in the armed services on the grounds that they believe Christians should be neutral in worldly conflicts.

Evading the draft

Historically, there has been resistance to conscription in almost every country and situation where it has been imposed. The New York Draft Riots (July 11 to July 16, 1863; known at the time as Draft Week), were violent disturbances in New York City that were the culmination of discontent with new laws passed by Congress to draft men to fight in the ongoing American Civil War. The Central Asian Revolt started in the summer of 1916, when the Russian Empire government ended its exemption of Muslims from military service. The conscription also became unpopular in Grand Duchy of Finland during the reign of Nicholas II and was suspended; instead Finland paid a levy tax, "military millions" as compensation for abolition of conscription.

In the USA and some other countries, the Vietnam War saw new levels of opposition to conscription and the Selective Service System. Many people opposed to and facing conscription chose to either apply for classification and assignment to civilian alternative service or noncombatant service within the military as conscientious objectors, or to evade the draft by fleeing to a neutral country. A small proportion, like Muhammad Ali, chose to resist the draft by publicly and politically fighting conscription. Some people resist at the point of registration for the draft. In the USA since 1980, for example, the draft resistance movement has focused on mandatory draft registration. Others resist at the point of induction, when they are ordered to put on a uniform, when they are ordered to carry or use a weapon, or when they are ordered into combat.

In the United States, especially during the Vietnam Era, some used political connections to ensure that they were placed well away from any potential harm, serving in what was termed a Champagne unit. Many would avoid military service altogether through college deferments, by becoming fathers, or serving in various exempt jobs (teaching was one possibility). Others used educational exemptions, became conscientious objectors or pretended to be conscientious objectors, although they might then be drafted for non-combat work, such as serving as a combat medic. It was also possible they could be asked to do similar civilian work, such as being a hospital orderly.

It was, in fact, quite easy for those with some knowledge of the system to avoid being drafted. A simple route, widely publicized, was to get a medical rejection. While a person could claim to have symptoms (or feign homosexuality) if enough physicians sent letters that a person had a problem, he might well be rejected. It often wasn't worth the Army's time to dispute this claim. Such an approach worked best in a larger city where there was no stigma to not serving, and the potential draftee was not known to those reviewing him.

For others, the most common method of avoiding the draft was to cross the border into another country. People who have been "called up" for military service and who attempted to avoid it in some way were known as "draft-dodgers". Particularly during the Vietnam War, US draft-dodgers usually made their way to Canada, Mexico or Sweden.

Many people looked upon draft-dodgers with scorn as being "cowards", but some supported them in their efforts. In the late years of the Vietnam War, objections against it and support for draft-dodgers was much more outspoken, because of the casualties suffered by American troops, and the actual cause and purpose of the war being heavily questioned.

Toward the end of the US draft, an attempt was made to make the system somewhat fairer by turning it into a lottery, with each of the year's calendar dates randomly assigned a number. Men born on lower numbered dates were called up for review. For the reasons given above, this did not make the system any fairer, and the entire system ended in 1973. Today, American men 18-25 are required to register with the government, but there has not been a callup since the Vietnam Era.

There are those who are immune to the draft in certain countries; these people include anyone who works for the government (teachers, police officers, lawmakers, etc.), people who work for government contractors, and those who work in jobs essential to the operation of the country (waste management, power plants, etc.). In the United Kingdom this is known as a reserved occupation which is deemed necessary to the survival of the nation.

In Israel, the Muslim and Christian Arab minority are exempt from mandatory service, as are permanent residents such as the Druze of the Golan Heights. Male Ultra-Orthodox Jews may apply for a deferment of draft to study in Yeshiva, and the deferment tends to become an exemption, while female religious Jews can be exempted after presenting "religious declaration" to the IDF authorities, and some (primarily National Religious or Modern Orthodox) choose to volunteer for national service instead. Male Druze and Circassian Israeli citizens are liable, by agreement with their community leaders (Female Druze and Circassian are exempt from service). Members of the exempted groups can still volunteer, but very few do, except for the Bedouin where a relatively large number have tended to volunteer (usually for financial reasons).

Countries with and without mandatory military service

{|class="wikitable sortable" |+Conscription by country — Examples !Country !Land area (km²) !GDP nominal (US$M) !Per capitaGDP (US$) !Population !Government ! Conscription |- || Albania || 27,398 || $11,800 || $2,949.57|| 2,994,667 || Parliamentary Democracy || style="background:#ddddff" | Yes |- || Algeria || 2,381,740 || $159,000 || $3,948.01 || 34,994,937 || Republic || style="background:#ddddff" | Yes |- || Angola || 1,246,700 || $85,810 || $5,003.43 || 13,338,541 || Republic; Multiparty Presidential Regime ||style="background:#ddddff" | Yes |- || Argentina || 2,736,690 || $351,000 || $8,662.99 || 41,769,726 || Republic || style="background:#ddffff" |No. Voluntary; conscription may be ordered for specified reasons; per Public Law No.24.429 promulgated on 5 January 1995. |- || Australia || 7,617,930 || $1,220,000 || $44,474.51 || 21,766,711 || Federal Parliamentary Democracy || style="background:#ddffff" | No (abolished by parliament in 1972) |- || Austria || 82,444 || $366,300 || $45,598.77 || 8,217,280 || Federal Republic || style="background:#ddddff" | Yes (Alternative service available) |- || Bahamas || 10,070 || $7,538 || $21,547.17 || 313,312 || Constitutional Monarchy with a parliamentary system of government || style="background:#ddffff" | No |- || Bangladesh || 133,910 || $100,100 || $481.36 || 158,570,535 || Parliamentary Democracy || style="background:#ddffff" | No |- || Belgium || 30,278 || $461,300 || $43,648.01 || 10,431,477 || Federal Parliamentary Democracy under Constitutional Monarchy || style="background:#ddffff" | No (conscription abolished as of 1 January 1994) |- || Belize || 22,806 || $1,431 || $4,327.67 || 321,115 || Parliamentary Democracy || style="background:#ddffff" | No. Military service is voluntary. |- || Bermuda || 53.3 || $5,850 || $97,000 || 68,679 || parliamentary; self-governing territory || style="background:#ddddff" | Yes |- || Bhutan || 47,000 || $1,397 || $561.89 || 708,427 || In Transition to Constitutional Monarchy; special treaty relationship with India || |- || Bolivia || 1,084,390 || $19,180 || $1,446.41 || 10,118,683 || Republic || style="background:#ddddff" | Yes (when annual number of volunteers falls short of goal) |- || Bosnia and Herzegovina || 51,197 || $16,320 || $3,246.78 || 4,622,163 || Emerging Federal Democratic Republic || |- | Brazil || 8,456,510 || $2,024,000 || $6,915.40 || 203,429,773 || Federal Republic || style="background:#ddddff" | Yes |- || Bulgaria || 110,550 || $44,840 || $5,409.09 || 7,093,635 || Parliamentary Democracy || ) |- || Burma || 657,740 || $35,650 || $285.60 || 53,999,804 || Military Junta || |- || Chile || 748,800 || $199,200 || $10,058.50 || 16,888,760 || republic || style="background:#ddddff" | Yes (only when the volunteers are insufficient, the restant coups are selectives, but is not enforced) |- || China, People's Republic of || 9,326,410 || $5,745,000 || $2,459.43 || 1,336,718,015 || Communist State || |- || Croatia || 56,414 || $59,920 || $11,430.32 || 4,483,804 || presidential/parliamentary democracy || |- || Cuba || 110,860 || $57,490 || $4,000.34 || 11,087,330ã || Communist state || style="background:#ddddff" | Yes |- || Denmark || 42,394 || $311,900 || $57,039.71 || 5,529,888 || constitutional monarchy || style="background:#ddddff" | Yes (Alternative service available) |- || Djibouti || 22,980 || $1,139 || $1,694.29 || 757,074 || republic || style="background:#ddffff" | No |- || Egypt || 995,450 || $127,900 || $1,592.08 || 81,713,520 || republic || style="background:#ddddff" | Yes |- || El Salvador || 20,720 || $21,800 || $2,931.75 || 6,071,774 || republic || style="background:#ddffff" |No. Legal, not practiced. |- ||Finland|| 304,473|| $238,000 || $46,769.47 || 5,259,250 || republic || style="background:#ddddff" | Yes (Alternative service available) |- ||France|| 640,053 || $2,555,000 || $35,240.62 || 65,102,719 ||republic|| |- || Gambia, The || 10,000 || $1,040 || $386.77 || 1,797,860 || republic || style="background:#ddffff" | No |- || Germany || 349,223 || $3,306,000 || $40,315.05 || 81,471,834 || federal republic || (was suspended on March 1, 2011, the last conscripts were drafted on January 1, 2011) |- || Greece || 130,800 || $302,000 || $29,384.60 || 10,760,136 || parliamentary republic || style="background:#ddddff" | Yes |- || Grenada || 344 || $645 || $6,557.67 || 108,419 || parliamentary democracy || style="background:#ddffff" | No (no military service) |- || Hungary || 92,340 || $132,300 || $13,901.01 || 9,976,062 || parliamentary democracy || ) |- || India || 2,973,190 || $1,099,000 || $972.68 || 1,147,995,904 || federal republic || style="background:#ddffff" | No-largest voluntary military force in the world |- || Indonesia || 1,826,440 || $695,100 || $1,844.53 || 245,613,043 || republic || |- || Iran || 1,636,000 || $337,900 || $4,497.11 || 77,891,220 || theocratic republic || style="background:#ddddff" | Yes |- || Israel || 20,330 || $201,300 || $25,191.86 || 7,473,052 || parliamentary democracy || style="background:#ddddff" | Yes (Israeli Arabs exempted) |- || Jamaica || 10,831 || $13,740 || $4,032.18 || 2,868,380 || constitutional parliamentary democracy || style="background:#ddffff" | No |- || Japan || 374,744|| $5,391,000 || $34,402.26 || 126,475,664 || constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary government || style="background:#ddffff" | No |- || Jordan || 91,971 || $27,130 || $2,644.89 || 6,508,271 || constitutional monarchy || |- || Korea, North || 120,538 || $28,000 |- || Korea, South || 98,190 || $986,300 || $19,514.81 || 48,754,657 || republic || style="background:#ddddff" | Yes (Alternative service available) |- || Kuwait || 17,820 || $117,300 || $44,421.22 || 2,595,628 || constitutional emirate || style="background:#ddddff" | Yes |- |- | Lebanon || 10,230 || $39,150 || $6,276.90 || 4,143,101 || Sources differ{{#Tag:Ref|sources differ regarding the precise type of government "parliamentary democratic republic" "republic" |- || Libya || 1,759,540 || $77,910 || $9,451.85 || 6,597,960 || Jamahiriya (a state of the masses) in theory, governed by the populace through local councils; in practice, an authoritarian state || style="background:#ddddff" | Yes |- || Lithuania || 65,300 || $35,730 || $10,725.96 || 3,535,547 || parliamentary democracy || |- || Luxembourg || 2,586 || $52,430 || $104,451.69 || 503,302 || constitutional monarchy || style="background:#ddffff" | No |- || Macedonia, Republic of|| 24,856 || $9,170 || $3,646.55 || 2,077,328 || parliamentary democracy || |- || Malaysia || 328,550 || $219,000 || $7,513.71 || 28,728,607 || constitutional monarchy || style="background:#ddffff" | No |- || Maldives || 300 || $1,433 || $2,842.58 || 394,999 || republic || style="background:#ddffff" | No |- || Malta || 316 || $7,801 || $18,460.73 || 408,333 || republic || style="background:#ddffff" | No |- || Mexico || 1,923,040 || $1,004,000 || $8,218.88 || 113,724,226 || federal republic || style="background:#ddddff" | Yes |- || Moldova || 33,371 || $5,357 || $978.36 || 4,314,377 || republic || style="background:#ddddff" | Yes |- || Nepal || 143,181 || $15,110 || $333.09 || 29,391,883 || democratic republic ||- style="background:#ddffff" | No |- || Netherlands || 33,883 || $770,300 || $46,389.35 || 16,847,007 || constitutional monarchy || style="background:#ddffff" |No. Legal, suspended since 1997. |- || New Zealand || 268,021 || $138,000 || $31,124.18 || 4,290,347 || parliamentary democracy || style="background:#ddffff" | No |- || Pakistan|| 778,720 || $174,800 || $872.88 || 187,342,721 || federal republic || style="background:#ddffff" | No |- || Philippines || 298,170 || $188,700 || $1,582.17 || 101,833,938 || republic || style="background:#ddddff" |Yes. Legal. Practiced selectively and only rarely. |- || Poland || 304,459 || $470,000 || $10,911.71 || 38,441,588 || republic || |- || Qatar || 11,437 || $126,500 || $74,688.97 || 848,016 || emirate || style="background:#ddffff" | No |- || Romania || 230,340 || $158,400 || $7,451.95 || 21,904,551 || republic || |- || Russia || 16,995,800 || $1,290,000 || $9,124.49 || 140,702,096 || federation || style="background:#ddddff" | Yes (Alternative service available) |- || Rwanda || 24,948 || $5,693 || $335.10 || 10,186,063 || republic; presidential || style="background:#ddffff" | No |- || Saudi Arabia || 2,149,690 || $434,400 || $13,622.68 || 26,131,703 || monarchy || style="background:#ddffff" | No |- || Seychelles || 455 || $919 || $8,669.64 || 89,188 || republic || style="background:#ddddff" | Yes |- || Singapore || 682.7 || $233,900 || $35,427.12 || 4,740,737 || parliamentary republic || style="background:#ddddff" | Yes |- || Slovenia || 20,151 || $46,440 || $22,933.99 || 2,000,092 || parliamentary republic || |- || South Africa || 1,219,912 || $354,400 || $6,423.04 || 49,004,031 || republic || style="background:#ddffff" | No (ended in 1994, formalized in 2002) |- || Spain || 499,542 || $1,375,000 || $35,576.37 || 46,754,784 || parliamentary monarchy || |- || Swaziland || 17,203 || $3,165 || $2,591.20 || 1,370,424 || monarchy || style="background:#ddffff" | No |- || Switzerland || 39,770 || $522,400 || $56,111.06 || 7,639,961 || a confederation only in name, legally and structurally a federal republic || style="background:#ddddff" | Yes (alternative service available) |- || Syria || 184,050 || $59,630 || $1,954.98 || 19,747,586 || republic under an authoritarian military-dominated regime || style="background:#ddddff" | Yes |- | Taiwan (Republic of China) || 32,260 || $427,000 || $16,768.11 || 23,071,779 || multiparty democracy || style="background:#ddddff" | Yes (alternative service available) An all-volunteer force is planned by the end of 2014, but conscription will remain in practice thereafter. |- || Thailand || 511,770 || $312,600 || $3,776.0 || 66,720,153 || constitutional monarchy || style="background:#ddddff" | Yes |- || Tonga || 718 || $301 || $1,873.06 || 105,916 || constitutional monarchy || style="background:#ddffff" | No |- || Trinidad and Tobago || 5,128 || $21,200 || $19,590.99 || 1,227,505 || parliamentary democracy || style="background:#ddffff" | No |- || Turkey || 770,760 || $729,100 || $9,322.83 || 78,785,548 || republican parliamentary democracy || style="background:#ddddff" | Yes |- || United Kingdom || 241,590 || $2,259,000 || $45,626.38 || 62,698,362 || constitutional monarchy and Commonwealth realm || style="background:#ddffff" | No (except Bermuda Regiment) |- || United States || 9,161,923 || $14,620,000 || $45,958.70 || 313,232,044 || federal republic|| style="background:#ddffff" | No Registration remains required. |- || Vanuatu || 12,200 || $721 || $2,146.52 || 224,564 || parliamentary republic || style="background:#ddffff" | No |- | Venezuela || 882,050 || $285,200 || $9,084.09 || 27,635,743 || federal republic || style="background:#ddddff" | Yes |- style="background:#ddffff" |}

Conscription by jurisdiction

Conscription in Australia

Conscription in Cyprus

Conscription in Canada

Conscription in Egypt

Conscription in Finland

Conscription in Germany

Conscription in Gibraltar

Conscription in Greece

Conscription in Israel

Conscription in Malaysia

Conscription in Mexico

Conscription in New Zealand

Conscription in Russia

Conscription in Serbia

Conscription in Singapore

Conscription in South Korea

Conscription in Switzerland

Conscription in the Netherlands

Conscription in the Ottoman Empire

Conscription in the Republic of China

Conscription in the Russian Empire

Conscription in the United Kingdom

Conscription in the United States

Conscription in Turkey

Conscription in Western Sahara

Taliban conscription

Arguments against conscription

Slavery

Some American libertarians oppose it because, as Rep. Ron Paul says, since "Conscription is wrongly associated with patriotism, when it really represents Slavery and involuntary servitude."

In 1917, a number of radicals and anarchists, including Emma Goldman, challenged the new draft law in federal court arguing that it was a direct violation of the Thirteenth Amendment's prohibition against slavery and involuntary servitude. However the Supreme Court unanimously upheld the constitutionality of the draft act in the case of Arver v. United States on January 7, 1918. The decision said the Constitution gave Congress the power to declare war and to raise and support armies. The Court emphasized the principle of the reciprocal rights and duties of citizens: :"It may not be doubted that the very conception of a just government in its duty to the citizen includes the reciprocal obligation of the citizen to render military service in case of need and the right to compel.".

Economics

It can be argued that in a cost-to-benefit ratio, conscription during peace time is not worthwhile. Months or years of service amongst the most fit and capable subtracts from the productivity of the economy; add to this the cost of training them, and in some countries paying them. Compared to these extensive costs, some would argue there is very little benefit; if there ever was a war then conscription and basic training could be completed quickly, and in any case there is little threat of a war in most countries with conscription. In the United States, every male resident must register with the Selective Service System on his 18th birthday, so he is available for a draft.

The cost of conscription can be related to the parable of the broken window. The cost of the work—in this case military service—does not disappear even if no salary is paid. The work effort of the conscripts is effectively wasted, as an unwilling workforce is extremely inefficient. The impact is especially severe in wartime, when civilian professionals are forced to fight as amateur soldiers. Not only is the work effort of the conscripts wasted and productivity lost, but professionally-skilled conscripts are also difficult to replace in the civilian workforce. Every soldier conscripted in the army is taken away from his civilian work, and away from contributing to the economy which funds the military. This is not a problem in an agrarian or pre-industrialized state where the level of education is universally low, and where a worker is easily replaced by another. However, this proves extremely problematic in a post-industrial society where educational levels are high and where the workforce is highly sophisticated and a replacement for a conscripted specialist is difficult to find. Even direr economic consequences result if the professional conscripted as an amateur soldier is killed or maimed for life; his work effort and productivity is irrevocably lost.

Arguments for conscription

Political and moral motives

Jean Jacques Rousseau argued vehemently against professional armies, feeling it was the right and privilege of every citizen to participate to the defense of the whole society and a mark of moral decline to leave this business to professionals. He based this view on the development of the Roman republic, which came to an end at the same time as the Roman army changed from a conscript to professional force. Similarly, Aristotle linked the division of armed service among the populace intimately with the political order of the state. Niccolò Machiavelli argued strongly for conscription, seeing the professional armies as the cause of the failure of societal unity in Italy.

Other proponents such as the late William James consider both mandatory military and national service as ways of instilling maturity in young adults. Some proponents such as Jonathan Alter and Mickey Kaus support a draft in order to reinforce social equality, create social consciousness, break down class divisions and for have young adults to immerse themselves in public enterprise.

Economic & resource efficiency

It is estimated by the British military that in a professional military, one company deployed for active duty in peacekeeping corresponds to three inactive companies at home. Salaries for each are paid from the military budget. In contrast, volunteers from a trained reserve are in their civilian jobs when they are not deployed.

Related concepts

Arrière-ban

Civil conscription

Civilian Public Service

Corvée

Economic conscription

Impressment and the Quota System

Indentured servant

Involuntary servitude

National Service

Zivildienst

See also

Alternative service

Bermudians Against the Draft (BAD) - a pending court case challenging the legality of continued conscription by the Bermuda Regiment as a military agency of a British Overseas Territory of the United Kingdom.

Bevin Boys

Levée en masse

List of countries by number of troops

Men's Rights

Military history

Military recruitment

Military service

Timeline of women's participation in warfare

Volunteer military

References

Further reading

Burk, James (April 1989). "Debating the Draft in America," Armed Forces and Society p. vol. 15: pp. 431–448.

Challener, Richard D. The French theory of the nation in arms, 1866-1939 (1955)

Chambers, John Whiteclay. To Raise an Army: The Draft Comes to Modern America (1987)

Flynn, George Q. (1998 33(1): 5-20). "Conscription and Equity in Western Democracies, 1940-75," Journal of Contemporary History in JSTOR

Looks at citizens' responses to military conscription in several democracies since the French Revolution.

Krueger, Christine, and Sonja Levsen, eds. War Volunteering in Modern Times: From the French Revolution to the Second World War (Palgrave Macmillan 2011)

Category:Article Feedback Pilot * Category:Political theories