school tradition | Classical economics |
---|
color | green |
---|
name | Thomas Robert Malthus |
---|
birth date | February 14, 1766 |
---|
birth place | Surrey, England |
---|
death date | December 29, 1834 |
---|
death place | Bath, England |
---|
alma mater | Jesus College, Cambridge |
---|
field | Demography, macroeconomics |
---|
influences | David Ricardo, Jean Charles Léonard de Sismondi |
---|
opposed | William Godwin, Marquis de Condorcet, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, David Ricardo |
---|
influenced | Charles Darwin, Francis Place, Garrett Hardin, John Maynard Keynes, Pierre François Verhulst, Alfred Russel Wallace, Karl Marx, Mao Zedong |
---|
contributions | Malthusian growth model
}} |
---|
The Reverend Thomas Robert Malthus FRS (13 or 14 February 1766 – 23 or 29 December 1834) was an English scholar, influential in political economy and demography. Malthus popularized the economic theory of rent.
Malthus has become widely known for his theories about population and its increase or decrease in response to various factors. The six editions of his ''An Essay on the Principle of Population'', published from 1798 to 1826, observed that sooner or later population gets checked by famine and disease. He wrote in opposition to the popular view in 18th-century Europe that saw society as improving and in principle as perfectable. William Godwin and the Marquis de Condorcet, for example, believed in the possibility of almost limitless improvement of society. In a more complex way so did Jean-Jacques Rousseau, whose notions centered on the goodness of man and the liberty of citizens bound only by the social contract—a form of popular sovereignty.
Malthus thought that the dangers of population growth would preclude endless progress towards a utopian society: "The power of population is indefinitely greater than the power in the earth to produce subsistence for man". As an Anglican clergyman, Malthus saw this situation as divinely imposed to teach virtuous behaviour. Believing that one could not change human nature, Malthus wrote:
Malthus placed the longer-term stability of the economy above short-term expediency. He criticised the Poor Laws, and (alone among important contemporary economists) supported the Corn Laws, which introduced a system of taxes on British imports of wheat. He thought these measures would encourage domestic production, and so promote long-term benefits.
Malthus became hugely influential, and controversial, in economic, political, social and scientific thought. Many of those whom subsequent centuries term evolutionary biologists read him, notably Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace, for each of whom Malthusianism became an intellectual stepping-stone to the idea of natural selection. Malthus remains a writer of great significance and controversy.
The sixth of seven children of Daniel and Henrietta Malthus, Thomas Robert Malthus grew up in ''The Rookery'', a country house near
Westcott in
Surrey. Petersen describes Daniel Malthus as "a gentleman of good family and independent means... [and] a friend of
David Hume and
Jean-Jacques Rousseau". The young Malthus received his education at home in
Bramcote,
Nottinghamshire, and then at the
Dissenting Warrington Academy. He entered
Jesus College, Cambridge in 1784. There he took prizes in English declamation,
Latin and
Greek, and graduated with honours, Ninth
Wrangler in
mathematics. He took the
MA degree in 1791, and was elected a
Fellow of
Jesus College, Cambridge two years later. In 1797, he
took orders
and in 1798 became an
Anglican country
curate at Okewood near
Albury in
Surrey.
His portrait, and descriptions by contemporaries, present him as tall and good-looking, but with a cleft lip and palate. The cleft palate affected his speech: such birth defects had occurred before amongst his relatives.
Malthus apparently refused to have his portrait painted until 1833 because of embarrassment over the cleft lip.
Malthus married his cousin Harriet on 12 April 1804 and had three children: Henry, Emily and Lucy. In 1805 he became Professor of History and Political Economy at the
East India Company College (now known as
Haileybury) in
Hertfordshire. His students affectionately referred to him as "Pop" or "Population" Malthus. In 1818 Malthus became a Fellow of the
Royal Society.
Malthus's tomb is in Bath Abbey.
Between 1798 and 1826 Malthus published six editions of his famous treatise, ''
An Essay on the Principle of Population'', updating each edition to incorporate new material, to address criticism, and to convey changes in his own perspectives on the subject. He wrote the original text in reaction to the optimism of his father and his father's associates (notably Rousseau) regarding the future improvement of society. Malthus also constructed his case as a specific response to writings of
William Godwin (1756–1836) and of the
Marquis de Condorcet (1743–1794).
Malthus regarded ideals of future improvement in the lot of humanity with skepticism, considering that throughout history a segment of every human population seemed relegated to poverty. He explained this phenomenon by arguing that population growth generally expanded in times and in regions of plenty until the size of the population relative to the primary resources caused distress:
Malthus also saw that societies through history had experienced at one time or another epidemics, famines, or wars: events that masked the fundamental problem of populations overstretching their resource limitations:
Malthus argued that two types of checks hold population within resource limits: ''positive'' checks, which raise the death rate; and ''preventive'' ones, which lower the birth rate. The positive checks include hunger, disease and war; the preventive checks, abortion, birth control, prostitution, postponement of marriage and celibacy. Regarding possibilities for freeing man from these limits, Malthus argued against a variety of imaginable solutions. For example, he satirically criticized the notion that agricultural improvements could expand without limit:
He also commented on the notion that Francis Galton later called eugenics:
In the second and subsequent editions Malthus put more emphasis on ''moral restraint''. By that he meant the postponement of marriage until people could support a family, coupled with strict celibacy (sexual abstinence) until that time. "He went so far as to claim that moral restraint on a wide scale was the best means—indeed, the only means—of easing the poverty of the lower classes."
This plan appeared consistent with virtue, economic gain and social improvement.
This train of thought counterpoints Malthus' stand on public assistance to the poor. He proposed the gradual abolition of poor laws by gradually reducing the number of persons qualifying for relief. Relief in dire distress would come from private charity. He reasoned that poor relief acted against the longer-term interests of the poor by raising the price of commodities and undermining the independence and resilience of the peasant. In other words, the poor laws tended to "create the poor which they maintain."
It offended Malthus that critics claimed he lacked a caring attitude toward the situation of the poor. In the 1798 edition his concern for the poor shows in passages such as the following:
In an addition to the 1817 edition he wrote:
Some, such as William Farr
and Karl Marx,
argued that Malthus did not fully recognize the human capacity to increase food supply. On this subject, however, Malthus had written: "The main peculiarity which distinguishes man from other animals, in the means of his support, is the power which he possesses of very greatly increasing these means."
As a believer and a clergyman, Malthus addressed the question of how an omnipotent and caring God could permit suffering. In the First Edition of his Essay (1798) Malthus reasoned that the constant threat of poverty and starvation served to teach the virtues of hard work and virtuous behaviour. "Had population and food increased in the same ratio, it is probable that man might never have emerged from the savage state," he wrote, adding further, "Evil exists in the world not to create despair, but activity."
Nevertheless, although the threat of poverty could be understood to be a prod to motivate human industry, it was not God's will that man should suffer. Malthus wrote that mankind itself was solely to blame for human suffering:
Malthus wrote of the relationship between population, real wages, and inflation. When the population of laborers grows faster than the production of food, then real wages fall, because the growing population causes the
cost of living (i.e., the cost of food) to go up. Difficulties of raising a family eventually reduce the rate of population growth, until the falling population again leads to higher real wages:
"A circumstance which has, perhaps, more than any other, contributed to conceal this oscillation from common view, is the difference between the nominal and real price of labour. It very rarely happens that the nominal price of labour universally falls; but we well know that it frequently remains the same, while the nominal price of provisions has been gradually rising. This, indeed, will generally be the case, if the increase of manufactures and commerce be sufficient to employ the new labourers that are thrown into the market, and to prevent the increased supply from lowering the money-price.10 But an increased number of labourers receiving the same money-wages will necessarily, by their competition, increase the money-price of corn. This is, in fact, a real fall in the price of labour; and, during this period, the condition of the lower classes of the community must be gradually growing worse. But the farmers and capitalists are growing rich from the real cheapness of labour. Their increasing capitals enable them to employ a greater number of men; and, as the population had probably suffered some check from the greater difficulty of supporting a family, the demand for labour, after a certain period, would be great in proportion to the supply, and its price would of course rise, if left to find its natural level; and thus the wages of labour, and consequently the condition of the lower classes of society, might have progressive and retrograde movements, though the price of labour might never nominally fall.
In later editions of his essay, Malthus clarified his view that if society relied on human misery to limit population growth, then sources of misery (e.g., hunger, disease, and war, termed by Malthus "positive checks on population") would inevitably afflict society, as would volatile economic cycles. On the other hand, "preventive checks" to population that limited birthrates, such as later marriages, could ensure a higher standard of living for all, while also increasing economic stability.
1798: ''An Essay on the Principle of Population, as it affects the future improvement of society with remarks on the speculations of Mr. Godwin, M. Condorcet, and other writers.''. Anonymously published.
1803: Second and much enlarged edition: ''An essay on the Principle of Population; or, a view of its past and present effects on human happiness; with an enquiry into our prospects respecting the future removal or mitigation of the evils which it occasions''. Authorship acknowledged.
1806, 1807, 1817 and 1826: editions 3–6, with relatively minor changes from the second edition.
1823: Malthus contributed the article on ''Population'' to the supplement of the Encyclopædia Britannica.
1830: Malthus had a long extract from the 1823 article reprinted as ''A summary view of the Principle of Population''.
In this work, his first published pamphlet, Malthus argues against the notion prevailing in his locale that the greed of intermediaries caused the high price of provisions. Instead, Malthus says that the high price stems from the
Poor Laws which "increase the parish allowances in proportion to the price of corn". Thus, given a limited supply, the Poor Laws force up the price of daily necessities. Then he concludes by saying that in time of scarcity such Poor Laws, by raising the price of corn more evenly, produce a beneficial effect.
Although government in Britain had regulated the prices of corn (grain in general, e.g., wheat) since the 17th century, the
Corn Laws originated in 1815. At the end of the
Napoleonic Wars that year,
Parliament passed legislation banning the importation of foreign corn into Britain until domestic corn cost 80 shillings per
quarter. The high price caused the cost of food to increase and so caused great distress among the working classes in the towns. This led to serious rioting in London and to the "
Peterloo Massacre" (1819) in
Manchester.
In this pamphlet, printed during the parliamentary discussion, Malthus tentatively supported the free-traders. He argued that given the increasing expense of raising British corn, advantages accrued from supplementing it from cheaper foreign sources. This view he changed the following year.
''Rent'' constitutes a major concept in economics.
David Ricardo, Malthus' contemporary and friendly rival, defined a theory of rent in his ''Principles of Political Economy'' (1817). Ricardo regarded rent as value in excess of real production—something caused by incident of ownership rather than by fundamental economic value imparted by free and equal trade. For Ricardo, rent represented a kind of negative money that landlords could pull out of the production of the land by measure of land's scarcity.
Contrary to this concept of rent, Malthus states that rent cannot exist except in the case of surplus. Also he says that rent, once accumulated, becomes subsequently a source of capital re-investment, causing positive effects through the growth and accumulation of productive wealth. He proposes rent to be a kind of surplus.
Malthus emerged as the only economist of note to support
customs duty on imported grain.
He had changed his mind from the previous year, siding now with the protectionists. Foreign laws, he noted, often prohibit or raise taxes on the export of corn in lean times, which meant that the British food supply could become captive to foreign politics. By encouraging domestic production, Malthus argued, the Corn Laws would guarantee British self-sufficiency in food.
1836: Second edition, posthumously published.
Malthus intended this work to rival Ricardo's ''Principles'' (1817). It, and his 1827 ''Definitions in political economy'' (below), defend Sismondi's views on general glut as against Say's Law. Say's Law states, "there can be no general glut". A general glut falls under the general category of what one might term Malthus's "Surplus Theory", as opposed to his "main", and earlier, body of work, which presents a "Scarcity Theory".
:"The question of a glut is exclusively whether it may be general, as well as particular, and not whether it may be permanent as well as temporary...[The] tendency, in the natural course of things, to cure a glut or scarcity, is no more a proof that such evils have never existed, than the tendency of the healing processes of nature to cure some disorders without assistance from man, is a proof that such disorders never existed."
1807. ''A letter to Samuel Whitbread, Esq. M.P. on his proposed Bill for the Amendment of the Poor Laws''. Johnson and Hatchard, London.
1808. Spence on Commerce. ''Edinburgh Review'' 11, January, 429-448.
1808. Newneham and others on the state of Ireland. ''Edinburgh Review'' 12, July, 336-355.
1809. Newneham on the state of Ireland, ''Edinburgh Review'' 14 April, 151-170.
1811. Depreciation of paper currency. ''Edinburgh Review'' 17, February, 340-372.
1812. Pamphlets on the bullion question. '' Edinburgh Review'' 18, August, 448-470.
1813. ''A letter to the Rt. Hon. Lord Grenville''. Johnson, London.
1817. ''Statement respecting the East-India College''. Murray, London.
1821. Godwin on Malthus. ''Edinburgh Review'' 35, July, 362-377.
1823. Tooke – On high and low prices. ''Quarterly Review'', 29 (57), April, 214-239.
1824. Political economy. ''Quarterly Review'' 30 (60), January, 297-334.
1829. On the measure of the conditions necessary to the supply of commodities. ''Transactions of the Royal Society of Literature of the United Kingdom''. 1, 171-180. John Murray, London.
1829. On the meaning which is most usually and most correctly attached to the term ''Value of a Commodity''. ''Transactions of the Royal Society of Literature of the United Kingdom''. 2, 74-81. John Murray, \
Whereas Malthus's main body of work presents a theory of irremediable, if not untreatable,
scarcity, three of his other works present a theory of
surplus: ''The Nature of Rent,'' ''Principles of political economy,'' and ''Definitions in Political Economy''.
''The Nature of Rent'' proposes rent as a kind of surplus, whereas the previous general definition of rent portrayed it as a societal economic loss caused by personal financial gain derived from land scarcity.
''Principles of Political Economy'' and ''Definitions in Political Economy'' defend the concept of the general glut, a theory that surplus value can present a problem. Rent as surplus, and a glut or surplus of goods as problems differ somewhat or stand in contradistinction to Malthus's earlier scarcity theory of ''The Principle of Population.''
Malthus became subject to extreme personal criticism. People who knew nothing about his private life criticised him both for having no children and for having too many. In 1819,
Shelley, berating Malthus as a priest, called him "a eunuch and a tyrant" (though the Church of England does not require celibacy, and Malthus had married in 1804).
Marx repeated the lie, adding that Malthus had taken the vow of celibacy, and called him "superficial", "a professional plagiarist", "the agent of the landed aristocracy", "a paid advocate" and "the principal enemy of the people."
In the 20th century an editor of the ''Everyman'' edition of Malthus claimed that Malthus had practised population control by begetting eleven girls.
(In fact, Malthus fathered two daughters and one son.)
Garrett Hardin provides an overview of these personal insults.
William Godwin criticized Malthus's criticisms of his own arguments in his book ''On Population'' (1820).
Other theoretical and political critiques of Malthus and Malthusian thinking emerged soon after the publication of the first ''Essay on Population'', most notably in the work of the reformist industrialist Robert Owen, of the essayist William Hazlitt (1807)
and of the economist Nassau William Senior,
and moralist William Cobbett. Note also ''True Law of Population'' (1845) by politician Thomas Doubleday, an adherent of Cobbett's views.
John Stuart Mill strongly defended the ideas of Malthus in his 1848 work, ''Principles of Political Economy'' (Book II, Chapters 11-13). Mill considered the criticisms of Malthus made thus far to have been superficial.
The American economist Henry Charles Carey rejected Malthus's argument in his ''magnum opus'' of 1858-59, ''The Principles of Social Science''. Carey maintained that the only situation in which the means of subsistence will determine population growth is one in which a given society is not introducing new technologies or not adopting forward-thinking governmental policy, and that population regulated itself in every well-governed society, but its pressure on subsistence characterized the lower stages of civilization.
Another strand of opposition to Malthus's ideas started in the middle of the 19th century with the writings of
Friedrich Engels (''Outlines of a Critique of Political Economy'', 1844) and
Karl Marx (''Capital'', 1867). Engels and Marx argued that what Malthus saw as the problem of the pressure of population on the means of production actually represented the pressure of the means of production on population. They thus viewed it in terms of their concept of the
reserve army of labour. In other words, the seeming excess of population that Malthus attributed to the seemingly innate disposition of the poor to reproduce beyond their means actually emerged as a product of the very dynamic of
capitalist economy.
Engels called Malthus's hypothesis "...the crudest, most barbarous theory that ever existed, a system of despair which struck down all those beautiful phrases about love thy neighbour and world citizenship." Engels also predicted
calling it a "reactionary doctrine" and "an attempt on the part of bourgeois ideologists to exonerate capitalism and to prove the inevitability of privation and misery for the working class under any social system".
Some 19th-century
economists believed that improvements in finance, manufacturing and science rendered some of Malthus's warnings implausible. They had in mind the
division and
specialization of labour, increased
capital investment, and increased
productivity of the land due to the introduction of science into agriculture (note the experiments of
Justus Liebig and of Sir
John Bennet Lawes). Even in the absence of improvement in
technology or of increase of
capital equipment, an increased supply of labour may have a synergistic effect on
productivity that overcomes the
law of diminishing returns. As American land-economist
Henry George observed with characteristic piquancy in dismissing Malthus: "Both the jayhawk and the man eat chickens; but the more jayhawks, the fewer chickens, while the more men, the more chickens." In the 20th century, those who regarded Malthus as a failed prophet of doom included an editor of ''
Nature'',
John Maddox.
Economist Julian Lincoln Simon has criticised Malthus's conclusions. He notes that despite the predictions of Malthus and of the Neo-Malthusians, massive geometric population growth in the 20th century did not result in a Malthusian catastrophe. Many factors may have contributed: general improvements in farming methods (industrial agriculture), mechanization of work (tractors), the introduction of high-yield varieties of wheat and other plants (Green Revolution), the use of pesticides to control crop pests. Each played a role.
The enviro-sceptic Bjørn Lomborg presents data showing that the environment has actually improved.
Calories produced per day per capita globally went up 23% between 1960 and 2000, despite the world population doubling during that period. Anthropologist Eric Ross depicts Malthus's work as a rationalization of the social inequities produced by the Industrial Revolution, anti-immigration movements, the eugenics movement and the various international development movements.
Malthus belonged amongst a group of high-quality intellectuals employed by the
British East India Company. They included both
James Mill and his son,
John Stuart Mill;
According to Malthus's biographer William Peterson, British Prime Minister William Pitt the Younger (in office: 1783–1801 and 1804–1806), upon reading the work of Malthus, withdrew a Bill he had introduced that called for the extension of Poor Relief. Concerns about Malthus's theory helped promote the idea of a national population census in the UK. Government official John Rickman became instrumental in the carrying out of the first modern British census in 1801, under Pitt's administration. In the 1830s Malthus's writings strongly influenced Whig reforms which overturned Tory paternalism and brought in the Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834.
Before Malthus, commentators had regarded high fertility as an economic advantage, because it increased the number of workers available to the economy. Malthus, however, looked at fertility from a new perspective and convinced most economists that even though high fertility might increase the gross output, it tended to reduce output ''per capita''. A number of other notable economists, such as David Ricardo (whom Malthus knew personally) and Alfred Marshall admired Malthus and/or came under his influence. Malthus took pride in the fact that some of the earliest converts to his population theory included Archdeacon William Paley, whose ''Natural Theology'' first appeared in 1802. Ironically, given Malthus's own opposition to contraception, his work exercised a strong influence on Francis Place (1771–1854), whose neo-Malthusian movement became the first to advocate contraception. Place published his ''Illustrations and Proofs of the Principles of Population'' in 1822.
At Haileybury, Malthus developed a theory of demand-supply mismatches which he called
gluts. Considered ridiculous at the time, his theory foreshadowed later theories about the
Great Depression of the 1930s, and the works of economist and Malthus-admirer
John Maynard Keynes (1883–1946).
Malthusian ideas continue to have considerable influence. Paul R. Ehrlich has written several books predicting famine as a result of population increase: ''The Population Bomb'' (1968); ''Population, resources, environment: issues in human ecology'' (1970, with Anne Ehrlich); ''The end of affluence'' (1974, with Anne Ehrlich); ''The population explosion'' (1990, with Anne Ehrlich). In the late 1960s Ehrlich predicted that hundreds of millions would die from a coming overpopulation-crisis in the 1970s. Other examples of applied Malthusianism include the 1972 book ''The Limits to Growth'' (published by the Club of Rome) and the Global 2000 report to the then President of the United States of America Jimmy Carter. Science-fiction author Isaac Asimov issued many appeals for population-control reflecting the perspective articulated by people from Robert Malthus through Paul R. Ehrlich.
More , a school of "neo-Malthusian" scholars has begun to link population and economics to a third variable, political change and political violence, and to show how the variables interact. In the early 1980s, James Goldstone linked population variables to the English Revolution of 1640-1660 and David Lempert devised a model of demographics, economics, and political change in the multi-ethnic country of Mauritius. Goldstone has since modeled other revolutions by looking at demographics and economics and Lempert has explained Stalin's purges and the Russian Revolution of 1917 in terms of demographic factors that drive political economy. Ted Robert Gurr has also modeled political violence, such as in the Palestinian territories and in Rwanda/Congo (two of the world's regions of most rapidly growing population) using similar variables in several comparative cases. These approaches suggest that political ideology follows demographic forces.
Malthus, sometimes regarded as the founding father of modern demography,
continues to inspire and influence futuristic visions, such as those of K Eric Drexler relating to space advocacy and molecular nanotechnology. As Drexler put it in ''Engines of Creation'' (1986): "In a sense, opening space will burst our limits to growth, since we know of no end to the universe. Nevertheless, Malthus was essentially right."
The Malthusian growth model now bears Malthus's name. The logistic function of Pierre Francois Verhulst (1804–1849) results in the S-curve. Verhulst developed the logistic growth model favored by so many critics of the Malthusian growth model in 1838 only after reading Malthus's essay. Malthus has also inspired retired physics professor, Albert Bartlett, to lecture over 1,500 times on "Arithmetic, Population, and Energy", promoting sustainable living and explaining the mathematics of overpopulation.
''[Malthus] became the best-abused man of the age''
''There is hardly a cherished ideology, left or right, that is not brought into question by the principle of population.''
Despite use of the term "Malthusian catastrophe" by detractors such as economist
Julian Simon (1932–1998), Malthus himself did not write that mankind faced an inevitable future catastrophe. Rather, he offered an evolutionary social theory of population dynamics as it had acted steadily throughout all previous history. Eight major points regarding population dynamics appear in the ''1798 Essay'':
# subsistence severely limits population-level
# when the means of subsistence increases, population increases
# population-pressures stimulate increases in productivity
# increases in productivity stimulate further population-growth
# because productivity increases cannot maintain the potential rate of population growth, population requires strong checks to keep parity with the carrying-capacity
# individual cost/benefit decisions regarding sex, work, and children determine the expansion or contraction of population and production
# checks will come into operation as population exceeds subsistence-level
# the nature of these checks will have significant effect on the larger sociocultural system—Malthus points specifically to misery, vice, and poverty
Malthusian social theory influenced Herbert Spencer's idea of the survival of the fittest, and the modern ecological-evolutionary social theory of Gerhard Lenski and Marvin Harris. Malthusian ideas have thus contributed to the canon of socioeconomic theory.
The first Director-General of UNESCO, Julian Huxley, wrote of ''The crowded world'' in his ''Evolutionary Humanism'' (1964), calling for a world population policy. Huxley openly criticised communist and Roman Catholic attitudes to birth control, population control and overpopulation.
Charles Darwin and
Alfred Russel Wallace each read and acknowledged the role played by Malthus in the development of their own ideas. Darwin referred to Malthus as "that great philosopher", and said: "This is the doctrine of Malthus, applied with manifold force to the animal and vegetable kingdoms, for in this case there can be no artificial increase of food, and no prudential restraint from marriage".
Darwin also wrote:
Wallace stated:
Ronald Fisher commented sceptically on Malthusianism as a basis for a theory of natural selection.
Fisher did not deny Malthus's basic premises, but emphasised the role of fecundity.
John Maynard Smith doubted that famine functioned as the great leveller, as portrayed by Malthus, but he also accepted the basic premises:
Ebenezer Scrooge from ''
A Christmas Carol'' by
Charles Dickens, represents the perceived ideas of Malthus, famously illustrated by his explanation as to why he refuses to donate to the poor and destitute: "If they would rather die they had better do it, and decrease the surplus population". In general, Dickens had some Malthusian concerns (evident in ''
Hard Times'' and other novels), and he concentrated his attacks on
Utilitarianism and many of his proponents, like
Smith, and
Bentham, whom he thought of them, along with Malthus, as unjust and inhumane people.
In Robert A. Heinlein's novel, ''The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress'', the character Bernardo de la Paz says to Mannie: "This planet isn't crowded; it is just mismanaged ... and the unkindest thing you can do for a hungry man is to give him food. Read Malthus. It is never safe to laugh at Dr. Malthus; he always has the last laugh."
In Aldous Huxley's novel, ''Brave New World'', people generally regard fertility as a nuisance, as ''in vitro'' breeding has enabled the society to maintain its population at precisely the level the controllers want. The women, therefore, carry contraceptives with them at all times in a "Malthusian belt".
''Urinetown'', a musical about a world torn by drought, ends with a shout of "Hail Malthus!" after explaining that all the characters in the show die.
''Green Lantern'' #81, released by DC Comics in December 1970 in the heyday of Paul R. Ehrlich's theories on population explosion, featured a story called "The Population Explosion" that presented the home planet of the mysterious Guardians of the Universe: a world named ''Maltus'' or ''Malthus'' where overpopulation forced many of its inhabitants to flee into outer space.
Bioy Casares's novel ''La invención de Morel'' makes frequent mention of Malthus.
The ideas of Malhus play a key role in the Xbox Live Arcade game ''Hydrophobia'', released in 2011.
The epitaph of Malthus in Bath Abbey reads:
Cornucopianism: a counter-Malthusian school of thought
Food Race, a related idea from Daniel Quinn
''The Limits to Growth'', from the Club of Rome
Hong Liangji, China's "Malthus"
Malthusian trap
Malthusian catastrophe
Malthusian growth model
Malthusian equilibrium
Malthusianism
National Security Study Memorandum 200
Overpopulation
World population
Dupâquier, J. 2001. Malthus, Thomas Robert (1766–1834). ''International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences'', 9151–9156. Abstract.
Hollander, Samuel 1997. ''The Economics of Thomas Robert Malthus''. University of Toronto Press.
Elwell, Frank W. 2001. ''A commentary on Malthus's 1798 Essay on Population as social theory''. Mellon Press.
Evans, L.T. 1998. ''Feeding the ten billion – plants and population growth''. Cambridge University Press. Paperback, 247 pages. Dedicated to Malthus by the author. ISBN 0-521-64685-5.
James, Patricia 1979. ''Population Malthus: his life and times''. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Peterson, William 1999. ''Malthus, founder of modern demography'' 2nd ed. Transaction. ISBN 0-7658-0481-6.
Rohe, John F., ''A Bicentennial Malthusian Essay: conservation, population and the indifference to limits'', Rhodes & Easton, Traverse City, MI. 1997
Negative Population Growth organization: a collection of essays for the Malthus Bicentenary
National Academics Forum, Australia: a collection of essays for the Malthus Bicentenary Conference, 1998
''Conceptual origins of Malthus's Essay on Population'', facsimile reprint of 8 Books in 6 volumes, edited by Yoshinobu Nanagita (ISBN 978-4-902454-14-7) www.aplink.co.jp/ep/4-902454-14-9.htm
''The Worldly Philosophers – the lives, times, and ideas of the great economic thinkers''. Robert L. Heilbroner.
Elwell, Frank W. 2001. ''A Commentary on Malthus' 1798 Essay on Population as social theory'' E. Mellen Press, Lewiston, NY. ISBN 0-7734-7669-5.
National Geographic Magazine, June 2009 article, "The Global Food Crisis,"
Librivox Audiobook: ''An Essay on the Principle of Population''
''Theories of Overpopulation'' - refer section entitled ''Criticism of the Malthusian Theory''. Catholic Encyclopedia website
''More Food for More People But Not For All, and Not Forever'' United Nations Population Fund website
The Feast of Malthus by Garrett Hardin in ''The Social Contract'' (1998)
Malthus biography by Nigel Malthus, a direct descendant of Malthus's brother Sydenham Malthus
The International Society of Malthus
Exponentialist website dedicated to Malthus
T. Robert Malthus's Homepage
EconLib-1798: ''An Essay on the Principle of Population,'' 1st edition, 1798. Library of Economics and Liberty. Free online, full-text searchable.
EconLib-1826: ''An Essay on the Principle of Population,'' 6th edition, 1826. Library of Economics and Liberty. Free online, full-text searchable. Malthus published a major revision to his first edition—his second edition—in 1803. His 6th edition, published 1826, and revising his various 2nd-5th editions, became his widely cited final revision.
Online chapter ''MALTHUS AND THE EVOLUTIONISTS:THE COMMON CONTEXT OF BIOLOGICAL AND SOCIAL THEORY'' from ''Darwin's Metaphor: Nature's Place in Victorian Culture'' by Professor Robert M. Young (1985, 1988, 1994). Cambridge University Press.
The Malthus Myth with Ian Angus, May 22, 2010.
Category:1766 births
Category:1834 deaths
Category:Alumni of Jesus College, Cambridge
Category:Classical economists
Category:Demographers
Category:English Anglican priests
Category:English economists
Category:English essayists
Category:English Anglicans
Category:Anglican writers
Category:Christian writers
Category:English non-fiction writers
Category:English religious writers
Category:English scientists
Category:English theologians
Category:Fellows of the Royal Society
Category:Green thinkers
Category:History of evolutionary biology
Category:Non-fiction environmental writers
Category:People from Mole Valley (district)
Category:Political economy
Category:Population
Category:Proto-evolutionary biologists
Category:Sustainability advocates
ar:توماس مالتوس
az:Tomas Maltus
bn:টমাস ম্যালথাস
be:Томас Роберт Мальтус
bg:Томас Малтус
ca:Thomas Malthus
cs:Thomas Robert Malthus
co:Thomas Malthus
cy:Thomas Malthus
da:Thomas Malthus
de:Thomas Robert Malthus
et:Thomas Robert Malthus
es:Thomas Malthus
eo:Thomas Malthus
eu:Thomas Malthus
fa:توماس مالتوس
fr:Thomas Malthus
ga:Thomas Malthus
gl:Thomas Malthus
ko:토머스 맬서스
hr:Thomas Robert Malthus
io:Thomas Malthus
id:Thomas Malthus
ia:Thomas Malthus
is:Thomas Malthus
it:Thomas Robert Malthus
he:תומאס מלתוס
ht:Thomas Malthus
la:Thomas Robertus Malthus
lv:Tomass Maltuss
lt:Thomas Malthus
hu:Thomas Malthus
mk:Томас Малтус
mr:थॉमस रॉबर्ट माल्थस
nl:Thomas Malthus
ja:トマス・ロバート・マルサス
no:Thomas Malthus
nn:Thomas Malthus
oc:Thomas Malthus
pl:Thomas Malthus
pt:Thomas Malthus
ro:Thomas Malthus
ru:Мальтус, Томас
sah:Томас Роберт Малтус
simple:Thomas Robert Malthus
sk:Thomas Malthus
sl:Thomas Malthus
sr:Томас Роберт Малтус
sh:Thomas Robert Malthus
fi:Thomas Malthus
sv:Thomas Robert Malthus
tl:Thomas Malthus
te:థామస్ రాబర్ట్ మాల్థస్
th:ทอมัส โรเบิร์ต มาลธัส
tr:Thomas Robert Malthus
uk:Томас Мальтус
vi:Thomas Malthus
war:Thomas Robert Malthus
zh:托马斯·罗伯特·马尔萨斯