Do blokes with banter get the babes?

Emma-Kate Dobbin

Thursday, December 16, 2010 at 08:43am
 

This week, news of the alleged romance between Shane Warne and Liz Hurley got everyone in my office talking.

“Warnie. Liz Hurley. How?” one guy uttered in disbelief.

Others started doing the romantic math about how Warnie, with his reputation as a sexual spinner, manages to pull so many hot women. Repeatedly. 

“He is Australia’s greatest ever spin bowler – so he is good with his hands,” said one bloke - who got a massive boo from us for being seedy before 9.30am.

“Most women couldn’t give a rats that he can throw a ball. That’s the type of thing guys would think women find attractive. But you’d be wrong,” said Tonia, 23.

So here’s me with my two cents: Shane Warne clearly has excellent “chat”.

While I’d have no idea what either of them do in their private time I think it’s a good example of this topic for the guys. It’s something that women feel about men… that often guys don’t factor in. 

Chat.

It’s what a six pack means to those obsessed with the physical, a six figure salary to those who like money. Only unlike the others chat wins out and wins over most women.

While people go on about the “X Factor” I think a lot of chemistry women feel for men relies on the “Chat Factor”. I’m not talking about men who know how to spin a quick pick up line or text (although that can be funny initially) but more about those who know how to keep a woman interested in hearing their yarns.

I talk about this all the time with both men and women.

And women love the chat. A bloke that gives good banter often gets the babe. 

I’m not sure if it’s something that men can learn or if it comes down to chemistry between two people – but women love a man they can “talk to”.

There is no secret there but in the initial stages of interest it’s not always about long romantic conversations… although they have their time and place. It’s about the banter – the back and forth – the exciting, fun, sometimes sexy chat that men initiate and women tend to LOVE.

But you’ve got to know how to back it up or you come up stumps.

A situation I call… when the banter bites back.

Here is what I mean – in the ocean of love nothing hits harder than waves of friendship!

Chemistry can get confusing for guys and girls fast. You don’t want to get stuck in the “friend” zone and nothing does it quicker than banter when there’s not enough action to come.

Warnie himself has a long history of loving to use “mixed media” to reel them in. And to be honest – no one could doubt that it works for him. He texts, he calls, he tweets. But then he meets up in person. And that’s the important part.

“Too many guys start sending texts, or they call, and then it just goes on and on and nothing happens,” Sandra, 28, says.

“It’s annoying. It seriously is something that they initiate but then it’s like they don’t actually act on it. By the time they do – you begin to wonder if they are actually interested or just wasting time, or just want to be friends!”

And that is what seems to be the defining moment in getting the “Liz Hurley” of your world.

Make your move – or your chemistry gets caught in a chat trap.

It seems most women would rather be thought of as a booty call—before being that person a bloke banters with just because they are bored.

That’s when the banter and the bloke often get banished for having no back-up.

What do you think? How important is the “Chat Factor” in a man for a woman? Do you think banter can be learned? Or is it something you just have naturally with someone? Can too much chat end up putting you in the friendship zone?

Have Your Say

Show Oldest | Newest first    Page 1 of 1    

I have been saying this for quite a while.
The “Chat Factor”, (great way to describe it, so simple), is such an important skill to have. You can have the money, the looks the confidence...........but without the chat factor, you will get no where!!  Having the gift of the gab or initiating banter can’t be beat.
I think this counts in all types of relationships as well. Can be the difference between a promotion or remaining in the same level you are at.
So go forth and work on the “Chat Factor”.  Who knows, could get you some welcome company tomorrow night out on the town!

The Dark Knight of Sydney (Reply)
Thu 16 Dec 10 (10:50am)

Looks, money, fame and entertainment value (the chat) get the hottest women.

You can have 2 of the above and still have success. The more the better, though.

If you’ve only got one then you’ll struggle and will probably have to settle for the second-rate.

If you’ve got none then you’re best off finding the dowdy girl.

Women like to be entertained and to feel special. This is why the gift of the gab can work. They’re usually pretty passive though and don’t offer much in return.

HappyCynic replied to Charlie Harper
Thu 16 Dec 10 (11:25am)

I call bullsh*t smile

The Chat Factor gets women all the time, the others can help but you don’t really need them.  I don’t really earn a lot (I do OK though), I don’t think I’m anything particularly great in the looks department either and I’m certainly not famous but I have no problem talking to great looking women, this has in the past translated into a pretty good strike rate wink

Also the more beautiful the woman the more she likes to flirt and banter.  At least that’s been my experience.  And I find it’s an essential factor in keeping my interest.

Sad Sad Reality replied to Charlie Harper
Thu 16 Dec 10 (12:07pm)

Women like to be entertained and to feel special. This is why the gift of the gab can work. They’re usually pretty passive though and don’t offer much in return.

True. And this is because hot women are generally A. Dense as cobalt. B. Extremely unfunny. C. Deadly boring. D. Incredibly self-involved.

So yeah chat can work, but I’d much rather belittle, work on her insecurities and pump and dump.

Tim replied to Charlie Harper
Thu 16 Dec 10 (12:33pm)

Happy Cynic,
I think Charlie Harper is 100% correct.
I know a few blokes who nearly come across retarded with their extreme lack of conversational skills. They are however good looking and/or rich, which results in them having zero trouble picking up and keeping women interested in them.
Chat can help, but the others are at least as important.

Sad Sad Reality replied to Charlie Harper
Thu 16 Dec 10 (01:06pm)

The Chat Factor gets women all the time, the others can help but you don’t really need them.

Help? The others can help? How’s the Twilight Zone this time of year?

women, this has in the past translated into a pretty good strike rate

Two cougars in leopard-print leggings from HR in five years is not a pretty good strike rate.

Also the more beautiful the woman the more she likes to flirt and banter.

BS. The more beautiful a chick is, the more cold, cruel and ruthless she is with the men she doesn’t want, because she knows she can. You have to think offensively. If she’s tall, tell her, “Be careful someone spotted the BFG around here somewhere terrorising kids...(look up) oh.” If she’s short, go to rest your drink on her head and say, “Sorry I have a side table at home just your height.” Etc etc. Watch your confidence and ability with women soar.

Movin On replied to Charlie Harper
Thu 16 Dec 10 (01:12pm)

SSR - you don’t like “hot” women, you don’t like fat women, and you don’t like ugly women. That leaves you with one extremely calloused hand.....

Sad Sad Reality replied to Charlie Harper
Thu 16 Dec 10 (03:06pm)

Movin On/mangyna, Incorrect. I don’t respect hot women. I do enjoy them though. Especially when they’re leaving. You don’t need to celebrate women to enjoy their best attributes, in fact it’s counterproductive. See Charlie Sheen’s latest acquittal. 

I pity and despise fat women. I mean how could you be a woman and fat? Superficiality is all you have to offer the world and you’re a pig? How does that work? How do you look out at the world, weigh-up (couldn’t help it) your lack of depth and achievement compared to men and still decide you can be fat? It just baffles me. It’s so selfish. Fat and proud women? Now there’s a paradox. Every chick wants to be model-thin. That’s why Marie Claire will always sell more issues with Kate Moss on the cover than some random fatties under the guise of “real women”.

ByStealth replied to Charlie Harper
Fri 17 Dec 10 (12:41am)

I have to say that its very rare for a girl to have a great sense of humour to the point where they can keep men entertained with jokes and funny stories.

Sure its possible to have a deep conversation (with some women anyway), but actual real entertainment from a woman?

Charlie is right.

HappyCynic replied to Charlie Harper
Fri 17 Dec 10 (12:54pm)

@SSR you don’t enjoy being single much do you?  Either that or you have the conversational skills of a pig with the attitude of an ass tongue laugh

And if you think my sex life has involved only “Two cougars in leopard-print leggings from HR in five years” then you clearly don’t know anything about me (thank G-d)

Once again I call bullsh*t smile

Sad Sad Reality replied to Charlie Harper
Fri 17 Dec 10 (02:28pm)

the conversational skills of a pig with the attitude of an ass

Wow! Snap! Don’t forget the humour of a sugar glider and the deportment of a Nepalese yak. I’m pushing for the strength of an anemic ant, but such things take time. 

Emoticons are for chicks. Just sayin’, you mantastic seducer you.

Back to your entry-level tech support nightmare oh lover of the old and infirm. I pray that one day the cataracts fall off and you see wonderful reality, the only real princess in this story.

EK,
I perfected my technique years ago, and it is so simple I can’t believe all men aren’t doing it.
The only thing women love more than talking is talking about themselves.  Ask a woman a question, she’ll talk for five minutes and go on six different tangents.
I like to ask questions that get women thinking - an easy one is this: ‘what was the funniest thing that happened to you today?’
It confuses most chicks, they have to think before they answer, but already they’re in a good mood, thinking about something funny.
The rest is easy - just ask women about themselves, not innane stuff like shopping or cleaning products, but things like travel (where they’ve been), literature and family.  Work and pets are boring, but chicks will talk about them anyway.
So, on a good night, I can talk to a woman for an hour, and she’ll be the one talking for fifty minutes.  All I do is nod, offer something supportive and she’s all mine.
Chicks love talking about themselves.  By using this technique, I’m chatting them up and they don’t realise it.
The next day they’re sending texts to friends - we had such a good chat, we talked about blah, I told him about the time blah.
EK,
To perfect this chat technique, I actually listen and remember what they say, so a week or a day later I can mention something we discussed.  Later that night the chicks will send their friends a text - he actually listened to what I said.
Putty, EK, pure putty.  It is simple to pick up chicks - just make them the centre of attention.
Damn, you women are easy.

ironmike of brisbane (Reply)
Thu 16 Dec 10 (10:56am)
Gigi replied to ironmike
Thu 16 Dec 10 (11:20am)

except you keep giving away all your secrets IM - don’t you know that this will make some of us wary of guys who exhibit this behaviour lol???

Strangely though - your techniques are very, very clever and i can see how a lot of women would love the ‘listening and remembering’ combination you use.

o_O replied to ironmike
Thu 16 Dec 10 (11:40am)

Surely this doesn’t work on every woman. Does it? There has to be some exceptions?

mike j replied to ironmike
Thu 16 Dec 10 (11:41am)

ironmike,

If you have to listen to a woman talk for 50 minutes before you can bang her, you have not ‘perfected’ your technique.

Sad Sad Reality replied to ironmike
Thu 16 Dec 10 (11:43am)

He’s not interested either, Gigi.

Shane replied to ironmike
Thu 16 Dec 10 (11:49am)

Mike is absolutely right.  Get chicks to talk about themselves and they’ll tell you that you’re a great communicator.  All you have to do is listen and develop the conversation to where she can take it.

It’s amazing how many women will complain about a guy who talks about himself, yet when women are encouraged to talk about themselves they’ll do it until they are blue in the face.

I find the trick to finding the good women is to find one who will stop talking about themselves and make the effort to find out about the bloke on the other side of the table.

Smidgeling replied to ironmike
Thu 16 Dec 10 (11:55am)

Gigi- Women always seem to think they’ll be different. You have no doubt seen normally sensible women go stupid as soon as they are the object of the guys attention.

Miles replied to ironmike
Thu 16 Dec 10 (12:02pm)

Well, as Ironmike has correctly pointed out, it’s about engaging them and their opinion, making them feel that they are their thoughts are important.  Similar to his suggestions, questions in regards to their opinions on certain things are also good.  They allow them to feel important, whilst also making them think and preventing them from simple yes and no answers.  In other words, it engages them - and if you can engage them in the first instance, you’re well on your way…

And yeah, like Ironmike said again, take note - remembering even small bits and pieces a week later is like gold wrapped in platinum to them.

Markus replied to ironmike
Thu 16 Dec 10 (12:03pm)

This, pretty much.

Claims that the gift of the gab is something you are born with is rubbish, as IM’s advice on getting a girl to talk about herself and remembering vital parts of the conversations is something that gets easier the more you do it.
I myself used to seriously struggle absorbing information through aural means but have worked hard in this regard, and have seriously improved in this area (professionally and personally)

The only thing missed out would be to ensure while working on this that they the girl is also aware you are interested in them as more than just a chat buddy (this should also alleviate your wariness Gigi!).
I’m sure this has never been a problem for you IM, but if not done correctly then a guy could be quickly roped in as the ‘guy friend’ a girl tries to dump all her issues on raspberry

Sad Sad Reality replied to ironmike
Thu 16 Dec 10 (12:26pm)

Listening to women is Beta. Telling them to be quiet while you talk to a mate is Alpha.

Gigi replied to ironmike
Thu 16 Dec 10 (12:40pm)

Yep i agree with you Markus - you do have to be careful of the friend zone for sure… but improving listening skills can only make you a better worker, friend, lover etc - it’s good for all facets of life.

@ Smidge - yes i’ve seen the most intelligent of women become ‘stupid’ around men they think are interested in them - it’s annoying as hell.  Almost like half the personality and brain cells just disappear.

As for the 50 mintues of ‘banter’ to get women into bed - all depends on the woman - didn’t think there was a rule to such things.

@ SSR - is that the best you can come up with today - your normal aspersions and comments are lacking imagination.  I just find it funny that IM gives away all his trade secrets - but there is truth to his words.

ironmike replied to ironmike
Thu 16 Dec 10 (01:23pm)

o_O
There are exceptions to every technique.
It might not work on the following women, because I’ve never tried it out on them:
- Overweight chicks
- beauty challenged chicks
- married women
- women with boyfriends
It might work, but I’ve never been bothered with those types of chicks.

Markus replied to ironmike
Thu 16 Dec 10 (01:58pm)

- married women
- women with boyfriends

These two examples link into last week’s topic of the booty call. In my experiences they were usually so frustrated in their current relationship that they will jump any semi-attractive guy who will bother to listen to them for any amount of time smile

Soso replied to ironmike
Thu 16 Dec 10 (02:31pm)

I find this technique works on anyone – not just women. And I’m immediately suspicious of anyone who uses this technique on me because I know it’s only being used for one of two reasons: To pick up or to avoid talking about themselves..

Tim replied to ironmike
Thu 16 Dec 10 (02:55pm)

I can’t say that i’ve ever had enough trouble getting sex to have to sit and listen to a chick talk about herself for an hour.

I’ve no doubt that Ironmike’s method works a treat but surely there are easier methods than having to put up with that torture?

razrea replied to ironmike
Thu 16 Dec 10 (04:09pm)

No I think a few guys have picked up on this.  But I usually like to ask THEM questions to find out what they’re really like.  Yes having the gift of the gab will always work with either sex.  Although if you’re female being hot helps.  A lot.  smile

JN replied to ironmike
Thu 16 Dec 10 (04:23pm)

You’re full of it Iron Mike. While guys like you mess around and waste time inventing methods to trap women, guys like me take them before you can even blink, without even trying. I’m short in stature, not particularly good looking, not at all fit, and not all that wealthy, but you know what - I party hard, I’m arrogant, I talk almost exclusively about myself or things I am interested in, I dance like a one legged elephant (but I’m always the first one up there), I’m loud, I’m obnoxious, and I tend to piss guys off but I get the best girl at the party or club or whatever pretty much every single time.

You know why I piss guys off? Because there is no way they will ever match my chat and they know it from the moment I open my mouth. Forget sculptured abs (I’m betting you waste half your life in the gym working on your guns you complete douche bag), or designer conversations, guys like me who can naturally dominate a conversation with anyone, anywhere, win the prize every time.

One day you’ll make it to the boardroom sweet cheeks; but it won’t be any time soon.

Mich replied to ironmike
Thu 16 Dec 10 (04:44pm)

It seems a bit random to go up to a woman and start a conversation with her beginning with “What was the funniest thing that happened to you today?”. If a guy did that to me, without any kind of introduction or opening first, I would think they were weird, but I can be quite a cynical sort of girl.

It is true that women love talking about themselves, though.

ironmike replied to ironmike
Fri 17 Dec 10 (09:26am)

JN,
Good luck with the ugly, fat chicks.
Anyone can pick them up, I choose not to.
One day you’ll work out what quality is, and how to get it.

Sad Sad Reality replied to ironmike
Fri 17 Dec 10 (09:26am)

Just when I was getting bored, you appear, JN.

off but I get the best girl at the party or club or whatever pretty much every single time.

Do they let the inmates have a whack at computers in mental asylums now?

You know why I piss guys off?

Because you’re diminutive, unhinged and haunt the nightclubs of Australia dressed as the Joker trying to like “freak out the squares and stuff.”

guys like me who can naturally dominate a conversation with anyone, anywhere, win the prize every time.

“Where’s the crash cart? We need to get this guy’s ego out of him before it ruptures from all the empty bravado!”

One day you’ll make it to the boardroom sweet cheeks; but it won’t be any time soon.

“We’re losing him.”
“Keep shocking his tiny little heart.”
“It’s no use. His ego exploded.”
“But the little guy won me over. It’s not often you see a little fella like that with the fight to go on.”
“Do you think girls around here warmed to him?”
“Ah ha...hahahhaahahhhahahahahahahahah!”
“You always know how to cheer me up. Beers?”
“Brew!”

Enzo replied to ironmike
Fri 17 Dec 10 (10:45am)

I dont think its a matter of being ‘able’ to chat....i think its more getting the opportunity to chat to these wonderful females!

ie.  Warnie and Liz Hurley......Andy and Megan Gale????

I think the everyday average joe amongst us, VERY rarely get the opportunity to meet these fabled relationships.....

They (celebrities) are just like us, seeking a soulmate, seeking the one night stand or even seeking the chance to ‘chat’.

I have no doubt whatsoever there are people amongst us who are able to catch their eye or even get them to join in with the banter.....the problem lies in when do we get a chance to meet these types of people in our current circle of friends???

Smidgeling replied to ironmike
Fri 17 Dec 10 (10:46am)

JN- Bitch please. Put me in a room with you and some hot ladies and we’ll see what happens.

JN replied to ironmike
Fri 17 Dec 10 (11:23am)

You really are far too serious SSR, but it’s always good for a laugh. Do you enjoy hanging out with Iron Mike in Cyber Space so you can stoke each others egos?

It’s a crying shame really because you are obviousely a smart guy, with a gift for language it has to be said, but burdened by an unholy hatred of women. I can just imagine how scintillating it must be at dinner parties after you have one too many glasses of Yarra Valley Shiraz (so hard to find don’t you know, but such a fine tipple) and decide to start discussing the abominable state of Australian family law. Next time make sure you ask for a pre-nup buddy.

Tim replied to ironmike
Fri 17 Dec 10 (11:58am)

EK I think you’ve already done a blog on Short Men

I present JN as people’s exhibit A.

Sad Sad Reality replied to ironmike
Fri 17 Dec 10 (01:09pm)

You really are far too serious SSR

If that was me being serious, I’d hate to see me being idiotic. No wait, I’d love that.

burdened by an unholy hatred of women.

I just say what I see without the filter most people use to obscure the truth they feel deep in their stomachs. And I say it with a certain je ne sais quoi.

I’d rather live in reality. Where women appreciate you for calling them on their many fabrications and lies of omission. They secretly despise the men who believe their tall tales. Pedestalise them at your peril. 

I can just imagine how scintillating it must be at dinner parties after you have one too many glasses of Yarra Valley Shiraz (so hard to find don’t you know, but such a fine tipple) and decide to start discussing the abominable state of Australian family law.

Wine is for the “learned” and dinner parties are for people called Stewart and Bethany. Had you said, “one too many bottles of Heineken and start ripping into the chick in the pink cowboy hat in some dingy nightclub to watch her drug-addled and surprised eyes widen with insatiable lust,” you would have been closer, but I probably still would have tore into you anyway. It is my nature.

Next time make sure you ask for a pre-nup buddy.

Marriage is for the weak. I will never make a mistake so transparently idiotic in all my life, and I once drank detergent, mistaking it for apple schnapps. Plus pre-nups aren’t worth the paper they’re written on. If a woman sleeps at your house twice she is entitled to half your plasma TV and 50% of the beer you plan to drink before you croak according to current trends.

EK,

There is a fine line between Banter, Booty call and boring… and the right level of banter is a MAJOR thing… too much and you’re just a larrikin, not enough and your beige…

Its a talent that can’t be learned, its ingrained… some guys have it, some dont…

I was bantering with a guy on email, text, online… basically any form of communiation that could be used, was exploited… but nothing ever eventuated… then he got annoyed that I didnt want to play the game anymore…

My thoughts are, If there is no intent to meet, then be clear from the start and dont sext at 3am when you know you would never follow it up!

Unicorn of The Ghetto (Reply)
Thu 16 Dec 10 (10:56am)

Oh my God this is something I have thought about SO much.

I have had to end two serious relationships plus a smaller/dating one for this exact reason.

Call it lack of intellectual or emotional connection via verbal discourse, lack of ongoing interest (i.e. if someone has no thoughts or ongoing opinions about various things) or whatever you want to call it, but when they asked me why I felt this way, I could surmise pretty much all of it in the following statement.

“I just can’t talk to you.”

The end result of not having a man to talk to, means that you feel you are without a best friend, an intellectual or emotional equal and a partner with whom you can talk freely to every day… which ultimately results in a feeling of:

LONELINESS.

In short, not having someone you can really talk to, especially when IN a relationship, actually made me sad.

And noone wants to be sad.

If you’re the type of person who needs to be able to talk with someone fairly regularly in order to feel happy, and you feel this is an important part of a relationship, then without it you feel like something is missing, and you feel somewhat disconnected and empty.

I tried to explain this to this guy I had to leave.

He didn’t get it.

I said, “Alright, sex is important to you, right? How would you feel if you were with a girl and she didn’t sleep with you for weeks? Would you feel emotionally disconnected from her? Not as close? Would you not CARE as much about the relationship as a result?”

He was like “Yeah, absolutely!”

DING! Lightbulb moment!

I wish more men realised this.

Turquoise (Reply)
Thu 16 Dec 10 (11:05am)
Gigi replied to Turquoise
Thu 16 Dec 10 (11:17am)

Couldnt agree with you more T - perfectly surmised.

The brain is the biggest sex organ - so connecting on a intellectual level and being able to talk is very important to me also.

Plus don’t you find that great in depth conversations can lead to even better sex???  Win - win situation!

o_O replied to Turquoise
Thu 16 Dec 10 (11:27am)

If you’re the type of person who needs to be able to talk with someone fairly regularly in order to feel happy, and you feel this is an important part of a relationship, then without it you feel like something is missing, and you feel somewhat disconnected and empty

Spot on!

mike j replied to Turquoise
Thu 16 Dec 10 (12:03pm)

How would you feel if you were with a girl and she didn’t sleep with you for weeks?

I’d feel that she was just like every other woman, using her body as leverage to get what she wants in much the same way prostitutes do.

Luckily, I don’t get a lot of that, as I don’t meet many women who object to having multiple orgasms for an hour or so.

However, Turquoise, men are actually great communicators. Most of the world’s great authors, actors, poets, playwrights, comedians, orators and philosophers are/were men. Clearly the common factor in your relationships is you, and if what you say in person is even half as boring as the drivel you post on this site, I’m can’t say I’m particularly surprised.

Conversation is a two-way street. Try making the return trip one day.

Turquoise replied to Turquoise
Thu 16 Dec 10 (12:35pm)

Mike J -

I can’t tell if you’re a nasty piece of work or just a troublemaker for the hell of it…

Firstly - of course I indulge in conversation, you idiot. Do you think I’m sitting there silently waiting for them to speak?

Secondly - your statement ‘men are actually great communicators’ is not a true statement. NOT all men are great communicators. Many are not.

Women, generally speaking, are better at communicating, particularly because socially we get to practice it a lot more - talking to friends and sharing problems and concerns and so on.

Some men really struggle to communicate effectively, especially in relationships, and have to learn these skills as they go along.

There are many women who are writers, actors, poets or who work in the field of communications so your example is just ridiculous.

I’m surprised you didn’t say that “Because Shakespeare was a great communicator that means all men are.”

Christ…

Sad Sad Reality replied to Turquoise
Thu 16 Dec 10 (12:57pm)

How would you feel if you were with a girl and she didn’t sleep with you for weeks?

Married?

Markus replied to Turquoise
Thu 16 Dec 10 (01:10pm)

If you’re the type of person who needs to be able to talk with someone fairly regularly in order to feel happy, and you feel this is an important part of a relationship, then without it you feel like something is missing, and you feel somewhat disconnected and empty

I might have misinterpreted this, but isn’t that what friends are there for?
Obviously there are things you expect to be able to share with a partner that you wouldn’t with friends, but the way I have read that sounds extremely needy, and it’d be unfair on any guy if you are expecting them to singlehandedly fill that loneliness.

Turquoise replied to Turquoise
Thu 16 Dec 10 (02:20pm)

No Markus,

I wouldn’t expect a guy to SOLELY fulfill all those needs.

I think everyone needs to have friends they can talk to.

It’s just that if you’re going to be around a man 24-7, he should really be your best friend, even if you still have a lot of other friends.

That’s just my personal view.

mike j replied to Turquoise
Thu 16 Dec 10 (03:30pm)

The fact that you live in a glass house conceived, designed, constructed, auctioned and mortgaged by generalisation doesn’t stop you from throwing stones, does it, Turq?

The example I gave isn’t ridiculous because I didn’t say men are better communicators than women. However, you openly claim the reverse, which is an absolute fallacy, and indicts you as the hypocrite that we all know you are. Women are always talking about the things they do better than men… they just don’t seem to ever actually do any of them.

Ultimately, your problem is that you’re externalising, as men who can’t communicate, men who don’t want to communicate (with you).

ironmike replied to Turquoise
Thu 16 Dec 10 (03:32pm)

T,
Years ago one of my exes was ragging at me because I was trying to feel her up.
‘Good sex to men is the same as good romance to women,’ she said.
‘At least I know why the sex has been so bad,’ I said.
We laughed and sorted out our ‘communication’ issues.  She wanted more romance, I wanted more porn-type sex.
Both of us ended up happy.
Point is, the most important tool a woman can use in bed (and a relationship) is her mouth - to talk.
Also, women might be better at talking - because they won’t shut up.  The constant chat makes us switch off.
I don’t talk to hear the sound of my voice, but women do.

Sad Sad Reality replied to Turquoise
Thu 16 Dec 10 (03:35pm)

Women, generally speaking, are better at communicating, particularly because socially we get to practice it a lot more - talking to friends and sharing problems and concerns and so on.

Wow. So many femo lies, so little time. This, Turquoise, is complete and utter BS. Women communicate endlessly, that’s true. But are they any good at it? A woman will say in a trillion words what a man can say in three or simply allows his actions to show. I don’t know about you, but to me that makes the man the far superior communicator. I guess we can add that feather to our already Big Bird-sized cap.

No woman has ever had a thought she didn’t voice. And no woman has ever enjoyed a moment she didn’t feel the need to blab about to her friends (often while still in the moment). That’s why Facebook continues to be such a success. The girls logged on to download their mindless days in meaningless sentence fragments and the guys followed to get into their pants. This, Turquoise, is reality. You should try and see it some day.

Lady replied to Turquoise
Thu 16 Dec 10 (04:07pm)

Turquoise - You have stereotyped which I really really hate! And from what i got you say that just because some men can communicate doesnt mean that they are better at it. But because some girls talk lots that means that girls are better at communicating???

Although I agree that if they want whats important to them they have to give you what is important to you.

Turquoise replied to Turquoise
Thu 16 Dec 10 (04:29pm)

Mike J… what is wrong with you...seriously?

Yes I’d say OVERALL women are generally better at communicating feelings and such, as they generally feel more comfortable with it, and it is more accepted…

I didn’t say men were ALL BAD COMMUNICATORS.

Some are great.

Some are not.

Some can’t hold a decent conversation and don’t have thoughts or opinions about much, just like the vacant type of woman that heaps of the guys on here always complain about - blank, vacuous and without much to say.

It goes both ways.

Believe me, there are plenty of men out there who come across as pretty blank in general, just as there are women out there like this.

All I said in my original post is that people who don’t seem to have much to say, or don’t seem to have too many thoughts to share, are not that appealing.

It depends on the guy.

I’ve had friendships and relationships where I could talk to someone, and I’ve tried being with someone who thought talking was a bit of a waste of time.

That’s fine - he’ll hopefully find a strong, silent female equivalent and live happily ever after.

And no, it wasn’t how he acted with ME only, it was just his silent nature.

Some people place importance on other things.

Well EK - i think it’s the balance between good communication, humour, intelligence and body language that distinguishes between the friend zone and more.

I have a good male friend that is very , very good at the ‘banter’ but always follows it up with charm and the ability to make every woman around him feel attractive and ‘girly’ - it works very successfully for him wink He’s cute, approachable and able to talk easily - doesn’t need loads of money or a high paying job, just his gift of the gab that attracts women to him.

You can always improve your communciation skills or learn how to be more confident in talking to people but some of it does come down to chemistry and feeling at ease with the person you’re conversing with.  I always find i’m more good at the ‘banter’ when i’m not feeling self conscious or thinking the man i’m talking with is so hot that i start rambling or blushing.

Warne must have something going for him cos his looks and cricket ability don’t really impress any female friends that i have - but given Liz Hurley is apparently smitten there must be some charms there ??

Gigi (Reply)
Thu 16 Dec 10 (11:07am)
Sad Sad Reality replied to Gigi
Thu 16 Dec 10 (03:18pm)

He’s cute

That’s all he needs. He could rate the world’s chess grandmasters and you’d still eat up every word with wide eyes, Gigi. Especially if he’s in a fedora and scarf with cute little Pseudo-nerd horn rims. 

I always find i’m more good at the ‘banter’ when i’m not feeling self conscious or thinking the man i’m talking with is so hot that i start rambling or blushing.

Seems you need to build a few more of those skills you were talking about. It also seems a guy’s hotness has an enormous affect on you, sort of disproving your communication BS. But anyway. You keep going girl.

cos his looks and cricket ability don’t really impress

I bet his fame and wallet do though. And again with the looks, Gigi? I thought you valued conversation. Liar. Self-deceiving, liar.

Gigi replied to Gigi
Thu 16 Dec 10 (04:13pm)

Ah SSR - we could sit here and debate my merits and communication all day but that’s a tad boring.....

Methinks it’s just a guise so you can accuse me of being self centred without giving away any detail about yourself whatsoever.

Sad Sad Reality replied to Gigi
Thu 16 Dec 10 (05:37pm)

Methinks it’s just a guise so you can accuse me of being self centred without giving away any detail about yourself whatsoever.

I am a vampire. There, I finally said it. I have been here on this godless planet for over 400 years last easter. I can still remember the day I saw my first automobile. Mary White, a wealthy governess, was sitting at the wheel. This surprised me as I thought “women shouldn’t drive” but she was so beautiful. Sweet, sweet Mary. Of course she later revealed herself to be a harlot along the lines of the good time girls whoring up and down Main Street and demanded I bite her and ravish her over and over. That’s when I began to assume, “not everything is as it seems with women.” “These creatures base their entire lives on appearance and treachery, I hope we never let them in the army, give them the vote or embolden them with unnecessary political, social and workplace concessions. That would be foolhardy.” Foolhardy indeed.

Gigi replied to Gigi
Thu 16 Dec 10 (07:25pm)

But do you sparkle in the sunlight like diamonds - seeing as i’m female and supposed to automatically adore Twilight??

Yes foolhardy to give women the vote and equality in only some parts of the world - better that we know our place never inherit property, have access to healthcare or education.

Ah - the good olde days. 

For an (which is let’s face it your modus operandi here) you do write well - i have to give you that.

Tim replied to Gigi
Fri 17 Dec 10 (12:04pm)

Gigi,
what’s Twilight?
And why would a vampire sparkle in the sunlight? I always thought they burst into flames?
Strange, must be a girl thing.

Gigi replied to Gigi
Fri 17 Dec 10 (02:40pm)

@ tim - it’s the series my teenage niece is mad about.... I myself prefer Harry Potter and other sci-fiction or fantasy.  Anne Rice’s version of vampires i find more enthralling as I’ve not read the Twilight books - not bowing into the pressure.

And yes - i do find it strange that Twilight vampires sparkle in the light rather than burn.

I do enjoy vampire flicks but Blade and Underworld are my preferences over the tween saga half my work mates lust over.

Not all women like stereotypically chick flicks you know!

I think you need something to attract women initially, and ‘chat’ to keep them hooked.

The initial attaction could be looks, money, status or even their desperation...but the chat is what hooks them once they’ve looked your way twice.

Smidgeling (Reply)
Thu 16 Dec 10 (11:12am)
Pan replied to Smidgeling
Thu 16 Dec 10 (01:45pm)

I dunno, I tend to steer clear of good looking men, I have a chronic aversion to the frail ego, vanity and rampant self-interest that is quite often present in them.

Besides, I love clever men - this requires chat first. A smart man is a sexy man.

Smidgeling replied to Smidgeling
Thu 16 Dec 10 (02:56pm)

Haha, first point- fair enough. This is often the case with most highly attractive people.

But your second point- Clever and good looking are NOT mutually exclusive characteristics. I believe I’m proof of that to some extent.

Gigi replied to Smidgeling
Thu 16 Dec 10 (03:02pm)

Agree with you Pan - smart is very sexy.... though looks are somewhat important let’s be honest - you need to like who you’re talking to and feel some sort of attraction.

I bet you’ve noticed that some of the best physically attractive men become very ugly quickly when they open their mouths and unintelligible trash comes out. 

@ Smidge - luckily for you, ur both sexy and smart.

Loving it replied to Smidgeling
Thu 16 Dec 10 (04:46pm)

Gigi have you ever noticed how it works the other way too? A man who initially has not caught your eye with his looks can become amazingly attractive once he starts talking. All of a sudden you start noticing the way his eyes crinkle when he smiles or his great teeth or the look he gets when he starts taliking about something he is passionate about or how great he smells I love the way that works. Once a guy has me interested in what he is saying or can make me laugh he immediately becomes more physically attractive.

Gigi replied to Smidgeling
Thu 16 Dec 10 (07:19pm)

@ Loving it - Yes i have had it happen many times that someone i have had a fantastic conversation with becomes all the more alluring to me, the depth of connection making them more attractive.

I’ve had relationships with a couple of men that others never thought were ‘cute’ but i found sexy because they had a way of captivating me and more often than not i could spend hours talking and laughing with them.

A nice connection always makes someone more beautiful.

Smidgeling replied to Smidgeling
Fri 17 Dec 10 (10:49am)

I agree that happens to a certain extent. A kinda cute girl can end up as a babe with a really good personality. But there’s a line.

Men, ensure that you are a good and sincere conversationalist.

Mostly, a lovely, warm conversation is all that we’re after. And you’re then likely to get what you are after.

You can read more ‘social skills stuff’ at my blog, if you’re keen. xxx

Social Sugar

Miss Bec of Brisbane (Reply)
Thu 16 Dec 10 (11:40am)
Sad Sad Reality replied to Miss Bec
Thu 16 Dec 10 (12:43pm)

Men, ensure that you are a good and sincere conversationalist.

Ah ahahahahahahahaha!

Hey Jane Austen, great to see you’re still kicking around girl! I saw a cup and ball you used to own on Antiques Roadshow a couple of months ago, it looked killer.

Mostly, a lovely, warm conversation is all that we’re after. And you’re then likely to get what you are after.

Jane, we have things called Coke dealers and DJs now who routinely pull women of, I guess you might say, a certain standard by doing the exact opposite of what you suggested you kook. Modern culture teaches us treating women like Pussy-Cat-Doll sexual playthings is the norm, nay even preferential. You keep sipping tea with your dollies, Miss Bec, you deranged feminist throw back and I’ll keep watching woman after woman take to poll dancing “for sport” (not because I’m an attention whoring pseudo-slut) out here in wonderful reality. Where no body lies and everything is just as lame as it seems. Peace.

Smidgeling replied to Miss Bec
Thu 16 Dec 10 (03:01pm)

I often disagree with SSR...but he’s very convincingly won this round.

Miss Bec- your advice will attract a small fraction of the female population. Go out to a club or bar using that advice and a guy will most likely get nowhere.

Turquoise replied to Miss Bec
Thu 16 Dec 10 (04:40pm)

I agree with you, Bec.

A genuinely warm man who is GENUINELY interested in me as I am in him, is what I suspect many women who want a truly loving relationship, actually want.

That’s actually all I was saying in my original post…

Before I got flamed for it by a few of the flame throwers…

ByStealth replied to Miss Bec
Fri 17 Dec 10 (01:09am)

Conversation is great for a relationship and even vitally necessary.

It is not needed for pickup.

If I want sex from a beautiful woman who I don’t know, a minimum of talking can often be to my benefit. Think Twilight and other chick crack.

It obviously works better for good looking guys with a masculine presence (read good posture and size).

At least once I’ve pulled a girl to the toilets without saying a word by knowing what the hell I’m doing with my body, mouth and hands.

Now I’m waiting for all the ‘But that would never work on me..’s. I don’t care about you. I care about the hot 21yo in the club thanks.

And women love the chat. A bloke that gives good banter often gets the babe.

BS. Warney has only managed to pull Hurley because she’s reached the end of the roller coaster of hotness and is desperately trying to convince attraction’s lonely carney to stamp her ticket for one last soulless ride.

When kitten becomes cougar Sad Sad Reality smirks.

If you’re reading this Hurls, ewwwwwwwwwwwwww. Yuck. How could you? Ewwwwwwww. He’s gross. Goodbye cred.

And Warney’s pull? Besides Hurley, all his women have been straight out of the Rooty Hill RSL quarterly. His ex Simone looks like the Braille version of the Great Gatsby up close. Ditsy, air-headed, sun damaged, fame-chasing glutton for punishment.

And Warney himself. What a vain caricature he’s become. Zoom-whitened smile, thinly stitched in hair, orange summer tan. He looks like a Jersey Shore granddad. What is this creature and where do we find a priest with the holy credentials to cast it out?

Back to reality. Hot women don’t care what comes out of men’s mouths, until it’s I do. 1. They don’t like “get” a lot of it. 2. It’s not like emotional and stuff but like maths hard. 3. It’s really hot today.

Hot chicks generally surround themselves with men who would struggle to pass the American drink driving test while sober.

“Say the alphabet backwards please sir.”
“Is that like with the As and Bs and stuff?”
“Wow your woman must be smoking bra.”

Make your move – or your chemistry gets caught in a chat trap.

You know why men spend so much time now waiting to make their move? Because women have made it clear that any unrequited attempt at affection is considered rape or at best sexual assault. So sure Warney can do it with his cruel mug on TV every week, but the average guy feels it necessary to put his toe in the water first. And forgive us if we don’t interpret your whole I’m-playing-hard-to-get, year 8, immature BS as a clear mating signal. I once knew a girl who screamed “no” at her date as he leaned in to kiss her in the hope he’d force himself on her for a good old fashioned date rape. True story. And let’s not lie, ladies, you only want the arrogant barman at your local giggle factory to sweep you off your giant gladiator-sandaled feet, not the fellow sending polite texts from accounts. Liars the lot of you. Get some self-awareness. And get it now.

Sweetheart replied to Sad Sad Reality
Thu 16 Dec 10 (02:57pm)

Brilliant piece of writing Sad Sad Reality of Here Unfortunately.
(Suggestion: Since you are here anyway you might want to consider “Here Fortunately”. I mean life can be such a drag and yet it can also be good; and if it can be good don’t you want to believe in that?)
Perhaps you should do something with your skill, because you are funny, pointed and politically incorrect, which makes for very entertaining reading.
Thanks for the smile you put on my face.

Sad Sad Reality replied to Sad Sad Reality
Thu 16 Dec 10 (03:51pm)

Noted.

ByStealth replied to Sad Sad Reality
Fri 17 Dec 10 (01:20am)

I’ve met girls who for one reason or another get turned on by rape and abuse (reinacting their childhood). It’s not the sort of thing you’ll ever hear about such as in today’s story on date rape in Geelong.

Buyer beware. My advice; leave the freaks in the freakshow.

Toni replied to Sad Sad Reality
Fri 17 Dec 10 (03:28pm)

I...I think I....love you, SSR!

The “Chat” will get you friends, that’s pretty much it.

I now have so many female friends I started out trying to chat up that most people think I’m gay.

Somehow, if you’re after more than a friendship it would seem that most women would prefer “Hey You, Let’s F@ck” than any sort of conversation or communication.

“It seems most women would rather be thought of as a booty call” - Absolutely correct.

Gomez12 of Melbourne (Reply)
Thu 16 Dec 10 (12:53pm)
Smidggeling replied to Gomez12
Thu 16 Dec 10 (03:03pm)

Make your move sooner. Make your “chat” more naughty and less “I’m there for you as a friend”. Done.

It can be a very fine line with some women though. Good luck.

Liz Hurley only hooked up with Warnie because he is RICH!...not because of some stupid “Chat Factor” you made up.

If Warnie only had a-hundred-bucks to his name, she wouldn’t give him a second glance.

Women love money. End of discussion. No great mystery there…

Outraged of Sydney (Reply)
Thu 16 Dec 10 (04:50pm)
Gigi replied to Outraged
Fri 17 Dec 10 (02:36pm)

Liz Hurley has millions of her own money and Warnie so i don’t think that’s the major attraction there.

My God get a room all of you!

SalC of BNE (Reply)
Thu 16 Dec 10 (05:04pm)

When I first met my now wife, it was only fleeting, but we kept in touch. Both of us at the time had partners, but we got along well as friends and had weekly phone chats. There was no attraction except as friends, no funny business, nothing “naughty”, no f-t-f meetings for coffee (100kms+ distance apart) etc. Just chats about life in general.

About 6 months later, on a weekend where we were both dumped by our respective partners, we decided “what the hell” and got together soon after, managing the distance factor.

My wife says to this day that she loved our chats during this time and ever since…

Though now our conversations, when I come home are more aligned to:

Wife: “How was your day?”
Me: “Good thanks. How was yours?”
Wife: <minute-by-minute account of day over next 1-2 hours>

*sigh*

LOL

Blackadder of Gold Coast (Reply)
Thu 16 Dec 10 (05:26pm)

JN you are a champ mate. Spot on.

MrBuisness of Da Gong (Reply)
Thu 16 Dec 10 (07:14pm)

Heaven help us that there are people like Sad Sad Reality. You must have been hurt big time...your comments show you have no respect for yourself or others. Maybe people can just be nice to each other regardless of whether they want to bed them and leave them.
Everyone should stop being so selfish and just communicate with others in a decent way.

Treat each other with respect

Samantha of Newtown (Reply)
Thu 16 Dec 10 (07:33pm)

Could not agree with you more! 

Emma-Kate Dobbin
Thu 16 Dec 10 (08:50pm)

My old company sponsored Warney, and he came to our offices for a couple of days to film a viral ad campaign. We were staffed by about 75% females, mostly 20-25, and to begin with, they had nothing good to say about Warney, given their knowledge of him was limited to “good at cricket, cheats on his wife”
By the time he left two days later, he had them all eating out of his hand.
What a legend.

alex of Bali (Reply)
Thu 16 Dec 10 (09:51pm)

People need to understand what comes out of man’s mouth is usually what attracts and arouses a women. Women are not as visual as men. I would say they 50% visual. Men are like 85% Visual. This means just the way you talk, the way you carry your self attracts women. It gives a glow of power, confidence, cockiness, sexuality, humor, intelligence that attracts women. Just the a deep voice arouses and attracts women.

Women can not do this and make it work most of the time.
Most guys are visual creatures. It doesn’t matter if you have a degree, six figure salary, intelligent. So in a sense most women would fail if they tried to chat up a guy just by their looks alone.

The other thing a man can admire from a woman, is a good natured personality. Good morals, respectable, patience and just. If she has bitchiness which is the opposite of good traits, he would not even tolerate a beautiful women with these traits.

john of Sydney (Reply)
Fri 17 Dec 10 (01:31am)
Gigi replied to john
Fri 17 Dec 10 (10:10am)

I think as mentioned above by other bloggers - people will shag hot or beautiful people with little regard to their personality or morals - wanting a relationship or ongoing connection to them is another thing altogether.

Funnily enough you mention men as being visual creatures which is true - but during my stint as a call centre worker I noticed i got asked out many times simply due to voice and personality - so men are not immune to the ‘fantasy’ element either.

Women do respond more to words and language but important to remember that many studies have shown women to get just as turned on by visual stimulation (i.e porn) as men.  Just saying.....

As the saying goes:

When boys are playing soccer and basketball during high school lunch time, the girls are always chating away. Little do they know that it is precisely that communication skill that made them better in communicating with people.

neo (Reply)
Fri 17 Dec 10 (09:40am)

the absolute most attractive quality a guy can have is charisma.

confidence bordering on cockiness and not crossing the line to arrogance - this is what is attractive regardless of looks, salary and all the rest. that and intelligence - nothing worse than trying to have a conversation with a deadshit

biscuit of melbourne (Reply)
Fri 17 Dec 10 (12:29pm)

I have a mate who had sexual relations with Jennifer Love Hewitt… and he’s a nobody, so to speak, in relation to Shane Warne’s profile. (and this was when JLH was ultra hot 10 years ago)

How? Gift of the gab.

He’s got it in bundles. he no longer sees JLH but romances a string of models around the world, as he travels with his job.

Perth of Perth (Reply)
Fri 17 Dec 10 (12:53pm)

Show Oldest | Newest first    Page 1 of 1    

Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide a name, you may use a screen name – this will be published with your comment, and a working email address – not for publication, but for verification. The suburb/location field is optional.
( Read our publication guidelines ).


Submit your comments here:

   
 

How to add a link: Enter the text you wish to be clickable, select it and click the 'Link' button to enter the link details in the popup box. Maximum of 2 links.


* Required Fields

 

Insert an emoticon Insert an emoticon



 

Profile

Emma-Kate Dobbin

Emma-Kate Dobbin

Journalist Emma-Kate Dobbin tells you what she’s learned about the workings of the male mind and the opposite sex.

Advertisement

View Entries by Date

December 2010
S M T W T F S
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Subscribe

RSS Feed of all the latest Women on Men articles ATOM Feed of all the latest Women on Men articles
Subscribe to receive the latest from Women on Men

Email a friend

To email this article to a friend, fill in the form below

Message:

close  x

News.com.au Blogs

Latest Icon - Comments
‘Sup Bossy 119
She bonked my buddies. Is it just pre wedding jitters? 116
Showboat 238
Things are getting old and grey down there. What should I do? 107
He’s got two girls on the go. Should I tell? 105
Reporters sans détails 48
His family thinks I buy cheap Xmas gifts. How much should I… 245
Most Commented Icon - Comments
Showboat 238
‘Sup Bossy 119
She bonked my buddies. Is it just pre wedding jitters? 116
Reader Comments Icon - Comments

Agent 86 says: Poor Amee! I cannot believe you interrupted her love-making with Andrew and Steve. How very rude of you! Why didn’t…

She bonked my buddies. Is it just pre wedding jitters? 116

quixotic says: Your 27 and a mature adult (minus the I am so handsome call) and she is 17 and a kid.…

She bonked my buddies. Is it just pre wedding jitters? 116

From around the News Blog Network

Latest Icon - Comments
No escape or excuse as Julia Gillard is way off course 0
IT WORKED 2
OPEN AND TRANSPARENT 7
Rudd to the rescue 65
REBIRTH IN PERTH II 8
Van Onselen would rather talk about the weather, than nine more disasters 127
Hero to Zero: The great ZeroGen scandal 8
Most Commented Icon - Comments
Column - Never the right time to say these policies kill 667
Gillard rues day her ship came in 590
Gillard must resign 514
Tips for Friday, December 17 388
Tips for Thursday, December 16 360
Look at your own hands, Bob 338
Tips for Saturday, December 18 282
Reader Comments Icon - Comments

spot_the_dog says: It must be “Bob Logic” Day all around:  Federal Greens Senator Bob Brown’s letter calling for journalist Andrew Bolt’s resignation:…

BOB LOGIC 12

Dean McAskil says: I am sick of the polite discourse we are expected to make with people like Deveny, Marr, Gillard etc. Time…

SHARING 75