Opens profile photo
Follow
Alex "Seasonal" Forrest ๐Ÿš‰๐Ÿ‚
@380kmh
#TrainTwitter - trains & train stations - passionate opinions on public transit & civic design - transit bureaucrat, but all views here are my own
Pioneer ValleyJoined March 2011

Alex "Seasonal" Forrest ๐Ÿš‰๐Ÿ‚โ€™s Tweets

this is ofc very difficult because it depends more on ability of vehicles to stay on schedule and be in place for the driver swap on time, and because you need to make sure all the drivers have a timely way to get from their depot to their swap location--but the payoff is huge
3
Show this thread
for the most efficient use of your transit vehicles (if not necessarily of your support vehicles), you want to use driver swaps to separate *driver breaks* from *vehicle layovers,* largely eliminating the need for layovers at all, allowing vehicles to remain in service more
1
3
Show this thread
at higher frequencies tho, your layover will fit better if it matches your headway or some multiple of it--if buses are ten minutes apart, then a ten minute layover fits perfectly at both terminals (if 5 minutes apart, 10 min layover = need room for 2 buses at terminals)
1
4
Show this thread
on a low frequency route, you want your layovers to fit neatly into your one-way or round-trip times, e.g. if a trip takes 25 minutes one-way, you could have a 10 minute layover once per round trip (or two 5-minute layovers, one each direction)
1
9
Show this thread
Caring more about fixing our broken transit pass pricing models than fareless transit or fare capping is a sign of a serious person who's spent the time to educate themselves about the relevant issues.
Quote Tweet
if you want to make passes cheaper for everyone, I'm with you--Americans get HOSED for their long-term transit passes, very slight discounts vs buying single rides if you want to make passes free for some, I'm with you again! income qualification makes a lot of sense here
Show this thread
2
16
ๅ…ˆๆ—ฅๅ‡บๆฅไธŠใŒใฃใŸๅธ‚ๅŒบ็”บๆ‘ไฝ็ฝฎใƒ‡ใƒผใ‚ฟใ‚’ไฝฟใฃใฆใ€1889ๅนด๏ฝž็พๅœจใพใงใฎๅธ‚็”บๆ‘ๅˆ†ๅธƒใฎใ‚ฟใ‚คใƒ ใƒฉใƒ—ใ‚นใ€‚ ็ดซใŒๆ‘ใ€็ท‘ใŒ็”บใ€ๆฉ™ใŒๅธ‚ใ€‚ ไบŒๅบฆใฎๅคงๅˆไฝตใงๅธ‚็”บๆ‘ๆ•ฐใŒๆฟ€ๆธ›ใ™ใ‚‹ใ€‚
Embedded video
2:16
4.9K views
243
*looks at you* HEYYYYYYYYYYY !!! *glompz u* I made you a cookie... but i dropped it on the orphanage floor where I grew up (my parents were murdered and I have super powers ...) *to myself* oh, I should probably hide my angel/devil wings ... T__T
2
22
occurs to me that I want to look at, say, decibels per hour rather than just max decibels
Quote Tweet
Replying to @boisfeuras71
the train horns in America are deafening, I live across the street from freight/passenger tracks. the trains are also pretty loud at this distance because of their weight--but the street makes more noise than the tracks, not bc cars are louder but more constant
7
since the problem is more about the hassle than the cost, the solution involves things like switching from paying per use to paying once a month, switching from paying with cash to paying with cards etc, switching from onboard payment to prepayment...you get the picture (I hope)
10
Show this thread
seriously though, consider the choice of words--there's a very good reason they talk about being "nickel-and-dimed" and not being, say, bankrupted...paying for transit (esp when cash-only, exact change!) is almost always a HASSLE, but rarely a financial BURDEN
Quote Tweet
anyway. tired of being "nickel-and-dimed" when you use the bus? I have just the invention for you: the monthly pass
Show this thread
1
13
Show this thread
but if you want to remove the ability for transit agencies to raise their own money--let alone to do so with no plan besides "simply find the money somewhere else"--then unfortunately we are not on the same side
1
22
Show this thread