Opens profile photo
Follow
Click to Follow jdbuatti
James D. Buatti
@jdbuatti
Legal Director . Once an intern. Occasional Twitter user. Let's all pretend I wrote something clever here. Views = own.
San Carlos, CAJoined May 2017

James D. Buatti’s Tweets

ICYMI: Legal experts, civil society groups, and former federal judges are asking the Supreme Court to hear Wikimedia v. NSA, our long-standing case challenging the NSA's unconstitutional monitoring of Americans’ international internet communications. Here’s what’s happening:
21
776
Show this thread
“We’ve always seen mass surveillance as a really significant threat to the privacy and free expression rights not just of Wikimedia users, but internet users in general.”—Our Senior Legal Manager in . 🧵⬇️ (1/3)
1
9
Show this thread
We're asking the Supreme Court to rein in our government's excessive and improper use of "state secrets," which has been used to stop lawsuits challenging government abuse over and over again. When the government spies on us, it must be held accountable.
7
158
We're still radical. We believe that the internet is a space in which everyone can access and contribute knowledge. A space where everyone can participate free of cost, free of tracking user data, and free of fear of reprisal.
Quote Tweet
“Before Wikipedia, there was no large-scale archive where people could gather and publish content that was bundled together merely for the public good.” When it was founded over 21 years ago, @Wikipedia was a radical notion. @Codecademy explains. ⬇️ codecademy.com/resources/blog
26
BREAKING: On behalf of Wikimedia, we're urging the Supreme Court to hear our case against the NSA for its mass surveillance of Americans' emails and internet communications with people overseas. The NSA has done this for decades without ever once getting a warrant.
16
469
Show this thread
Our Transparency Report is OUT! The report showcases the actions that reflect our commitments to transparency, privacy, and to provide free knowledge. Ex: 🛑 Requests for user info: 1/18 granted 🛑 Requests to remove content: 0/546 granted Read in full:
16
So weird how “sexual content” became “gay people,” a thing no one could have possibly ever predicted happening when Florida passed its legislation and a bunch of people predicted this happening
Quote Tweet
This is literally just two moms. A family, with parents and child loving each other. Insistence that attacks on Disney, including by govt, are about protecting young kids from sexual content out the window. The complaint is about treating LGBT people as normal rather than lesser.
Show this thread
Image
187
4,500
Show this thread
We've been tracking the EU DSA from the start and have always seen it as an opportunity to protect the community-governed, public interest internet, which is what we asked policymakers to do. How did the final outcomes stack up to our requests? 👀👇
2
25
Show this thread
The DSA had a fairly open, democratic drafting process until the past few weeks. But what is happening now is shameful. Interest groups are getting ideas tacked on — things that will become binding law for a generation — that never had any public airing, debate, or input at all.
Quote Tweet
And yet another dangerous backdoor regarding copyright in the DSA. New proposed amendment may force search engines to actively (generally?) monitor content and delist entire websites. Copyright filters and right to be forgotten at their worst. euractiv.com/section/digita
6
181
Show this thread
📢 The UK Online Safety Bill: The specific needs of platforms like ours are often ignored in new online regulation proposals. This bill is no exception. It is misguided in terms of the users it claims to protect & the platforms it 'holds accountable.'
1
34
This is a really big deal. And as notes, it is insane (if true, which I assume it is) that EU authorities didn't tell the public. We only know bc Google shared it with the . Many thanks to whoever inside Google fought for, and signed off on, that.
Quote Tweet
Remarkable news for tech law nerds. EU sanctions against Russia Today and Sputnik require: * search engines to delist all their content, and * social media firms to delete posts by individuals which reproduce any of their content. Commission’s explanatory text in images. 1/
Show this thread
Image
Image
Image
10
193
Show this thread
Just an insane decision. And note that this lawsuit is being brought under the California Environmental Quality Act, though everyone, on all sides, knows the issues here aren't environmental. So please, stop telling me how CEQA has already been fixed.
195
5,212
Show this thread
A couple of boomers angry that they live in a college town are on the cusp of getting the nation's #1 public university to reject a whole new generation of Californian college students (who are exponentially Latinos).
Quote Tweet
UC Berkeley must slash new enrollment by a third unless high court intervenes berkeleyside.org/2022/02/14/uc-
43
3,955
Show this thread
Where the Republican co-sponsors of that aspect of the Freedom to Vote Act that would rein in partisan gerrymandering of congressional districts? If there were Republicans willing to go along and overcome the filibuster and Ds didn't take that offer, THAT would be hypocritical.
Quote Tweet
Replying to @mattyglesias
i do think there is something to the GOP complaint of hypocrisy: the D claim is that gerrymandering isn't merely bad, but unconstitutional/anti-democratic/violation of the right to vote. typically, we don't think of that as something that can ever be justified by the other side
3
75
Show this thread