Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Politics, government, and law
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:
Should the word falsely be included in the first sentence of the lead? soibangla (talk) 09:08, 1 June 2022 (UTC) |
Looking at reliable sources, how should we describe the political position of the Italian Social Movement?
Please choose one of the three options, preferably together with a motivation and reliable sources that explicitly support the party's political position.--Scia Della Cometa (talk) 19:20, 28 May 2022 (UTC) |
Talk:People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran
Should the following paragraph be shortened and move some parts to more relevant sections?
|
Talk:Social Democratic Progress Party
A dispute surged about the official ideology of the party as presented on the Infobox as the statute of the party describes it as social democratic while other sources used do not describe the party but describe the party's latest candidate as liberal and conservative. --152.231.144.202 (talk) 00:02, 22 May 2022 (UTC) |
A dispute has arisen about whether General Dvornikov's nickname as 'The Butcher of Syria' should be included in this article or not. Opinion in favour is based on the fact that he is referred to using that nickname in multiple reliable sources. Opinion against is based on the sources being biased and the nickname originating with a retired US admiral whose opinion may not be definitive. --Shimbo (talk) 10:50, 19 May 2022 (UTC) |
Should the following paragraph, sourced to VICE (RSP entry), be included in the "Political activities" section?
See the back and forth in the page history after this edit, and the discussion in the section above. Endwise (talk) 05:50, 19 May 2022 (UTC) |
Talk:Killing of Brittanee Drexel
Should this article include murder categories when there has been no judicial finding of murder? WWGB (talk) 02:25, 19 May 2022 (UTC) |
Talk:Scott Jensen (Minnesota politician)
Should “On the Issues” by Snopes to add information in this article’s lead about the subjects political stances? On the Issues’s reports that Jensen is still a “moderate Republican” citing his provided stances from his gubernatorial campaign website among other things. While the only current listed source says he has left behind his moderate stance completely and has moved right. Should OTI’s take be reflected in the article? See the following options:
Option A (current): According to the Star Tribune, Jensen was regarded as a moderate and maverick during his term in the legislature, but his views have shifted to the right after leaving the legislature. Option B (change with On The Issues source): Jensen has been regarded as a moderate and as a political maverick, especially during his tenure in the legislature, but media outlets, such as the Star Tribune, have noted that his views have shifted to the right since leaving the legislature. |
Should Andriy Biletsky be described as a white supremacist in the article's lede and "Political views" section? Lkb335 (talk) 18:04, 14 May 2022 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
Which of the following best describes the reliability of TASS ?
|
Should we update the political position into the infobox to "Radical left to far-left". Lsandre (talk) 20:07, 12 May 2022 (UTC) |
Should we update the political position into the infobox to "Radical left to far-left". Lsandre (talk) 20:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC) |
Talk:Zionism as settler colonialism
We need a whole bunch more eyes on this article, its framing, and its intervention in other Wikipedia articles on this topic if any of y'all have better blood pressure medicine or deeper knowledge of this topic than I do. It may be fine that the current lede of settler colonialism involves accusations of genocide or that this title is completely differently formatted for every other section link coming off of settler colonialism. I really don't know and I do appreciate that the current editors on this new page have been formatting well and finding sources to build their page. An intro "graph" of exactly 4 data points seems like an excellent example of how lazy and partisan "sources" on this topic can be, however, and I'd be much more comfortable with wider community involvement from both sides plus plenty of neutrals. — LlywelynII 23:15, 10 May 2022 (UTC) |
Should we update the political position into the infobox to "Radical left to far-left". Lsandre (talk) 21:53, 10 May 2022 (UTC) |
Talk:Europe Ecology – The Greens
Should we update the political position into the infobox to "Radical left to far-left" or "Radical left". Lsandre (talk) 21:06, 10 May 2022 (UTC) |
Talk:List of minority governors and lieutenant governors in the United States
Should Chris Sununu be included in List of minority governors and lieutenant governors in the United States?
This question was already proposed before but a new viewpoint has come to light : https://books.google.com/books?id=fL5kDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT268&lpg=PT268&dq=%22chris+sununu%22+latino&source=bl&ots=bcRHEE5mgH&sig=ACfU3U3Npd-5dirMOAgtF1278LfNVC4XYA&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22chris%20sununu%22%20latino&f=false
2600:8807:C80B:2D00:44D9:A6D5:9499:B1E7 (talk) 01:50, 8 May 2022 (UTC) |
Have the neutrality issues raised in April 2022 been solved? Can the banner on top of the page be removed? Dentren | Talk 05:52, 7 May 2022 (UTC) |
Hi, everyone. There was recently some discussion regarding the article's infobox pic. Do you think the main infobox picture should be changed? Here is an example:
Thank you all! Gamle Kvitrafn (talk) 20:10, 6 May 2022 (UTC) |
Talk:People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran
All of the active editors in this talk page seem to agree that the article needs shortening, and this RFC suggests shortening the section "Removal of designation".
To avoid confusion that we faced in some past discussions, this RFC consists of 3 separate sections: 1) Discussion 2) Shortening proposals 3) Votes: which proposal you support and why Please add your comment, shortening proposal (if any), or vote in the relevant section. Fad Ariff (talk) 12:54, 6 May 2022 (UTC) |
Talk:Ideological bias on Wikipedia
Should Larry Sanger's criticisms of alleged ideological bias on Wikipedia be included in Claims of bias section? Sources discussing Sanger's criticisms include The Times, The Independent, and The Telegraph, among others. There has been discussion in the above section, at NPOVN, and a previous RfC on the matter. Endwise (talk) 08:37, 6 May 2022 (UTC) |