User talk:Yann

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

/archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47

• User:Yann/Valued images, 2009-2014, 2015-2016, 2017-2019
• User:Yann/Quality images, 2005-2014, 2015-2016
• User:Yann/Featured images, 2009-2018

God is busy, may I help you? / Dieu est occupé, puis-je vous aider?

You can leave me a message in English or French, at the bottom. Click here. Yann 22:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

You delete Wikimedia commons

Hi, you let delete WikimediaCommons I uploadet. You wrote there was a copyright violation: I, as U-Boot37, was the creator of the original artworks, and I manage the profiles of the band and I'm fully authorized to pubblish. Before removing, you could ask User:GreenArrowsHC —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 151.95.102.194 (talk) 19:38, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

If the original publication was on another website I would advise you to read COM:VRT. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 22:52, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

User_talk:Fæ/IA_books

Most of the DR's you nudged me about were in relation to this project.

Fæ hasn't edited for a few days, and just before they ceased editing, I'd posted on VP (now removed), saying that the project really ought to be in Commons namespace, and that the support of other contributors was needed.

I'm not sure how to proceed, as amongst the nearly 1.5 million works uploaded, there will inevtiably be some that Commons cannot host, due in part to errors and omissions in the IA metadata used to assist the bulk uploading project. There are also happily as you mentioned many where a simple licence update will resolve the issue. Thanks to the efforts of other contributors some of the DR's are in this situation.

Would you please have word with your fellow admins about how to migrate the 'project' page to Commons namespace, and develop an appropriate process to review the uploads made by it?? A CCI would not be the appropriate process, as there's clearly not been bad faith on the part of the contributors undertaking it.

Fæ had previously posted about this project to Village Pump, but given the sheer level of contributions made to Commons, this may not necessarily have been noted by contributors able to assist in reviewing. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:56, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

@Fæ: Hi, ShakespeareFan00 has suggested to move this project to Commons namespace. Are you OK with that? Regards, Yann (talk) 09:18, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

@Yann: - Fæ seems to have left Commons, so I would suggest the issue of discussing "elevation" of this project with other admins, with a view to finding someone to 'adopt' it as a temporary measure. ShakespeareFan00 (talk)

@ShakespeareFan00: Hi, I won't move Fæ's page unless there is a consensus to do that. So you should open a discussion on COM:VP. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:30, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

@ShakespeareFan00:  Done I moved the page. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:26, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Target Australia logos

Hi Yann. I was just seeking a bit more clarification as to your closing message on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Target Logo.svg ("No valid reason for deletion. PD-textlogo").

As I explained thoroughly in the discussion, the threshold of originality and existing common law in Australia gives no merit to plain text public domain claims. The two images in question, File:Sign-for-Target-Myer-Centre.jpg and File:Target Logo.svg, are both Australian in origin, exceed the threshold of originality (the Aboriginal Australian flag, which is three horizontal triangles, was found to be copyrightable in court, for reference), and no identified court case has ever upheld the logic behind {{PD-textlogo}}. Per COM:EVID, the keep argument did not provide any reasonable evidence to support a number of their claims, and the evidence provided by the delete argument rather conclusively showed there was no relationship between en:Target Corporation and en:Target Australia, which was the principle keep argument. All of this together, even with what I feel is a rather clear cut case for deletion, I feel as though COM:PCP should have been rather clearly invoked given the significant evidence and disagreement.

I also feel as through your closing message did not give, what I would consider, adequate explanation or justification for your decision. I find this especially given that there were several significant arguments involved, and that your conclusion was opposite to that of the majority of respondents (there was only one user who objected to deleting, versus three supporting deletion).

I hope that I've made myself clear, and that you'll be able to provide a bit more of a justification and explanation on how you came to your conclusion :) ItsPugle (talk) 10:05, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

@ItsPugle: Hi, I honestly think that the current interpretation of Australian law on this matter is a complete nonsense. In this case, there are different opinions about the acceptability of this logo for Commons, so I have chosen what we should always do, i.e. the most favorable position for Commons. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:55, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for getting back to me. Would you be able to elaborate a bit more on how the current understanding of Australian law is "complete nonsense"? The only opinion against deleting it is based around a supposed connection between the United States and Australian companies, but both companies have stated they are not related, which I think nullifies any weight to this. I'm also a little concerned about your last sentence though as that directly goes against the precautionary principle. ItsPugle (talk) 08:05, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi Yann. Just wondering if you'd be able to reply to the message I left you over a fortnight ago, on the 12th? ItsPugle (talk) 10:48, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Copyright on Columbia Pool Image

Pardon my ignorance but I wasn't sure how to deal with copyright on this. The file is in the public archives of the City of Portland. It is public record and is therefore free to reproduce. It was made in 1973 and published without copyright therefore it should be "in the public domain due to failure to comply with required formalities" per https://copyright.cornell.edu/publicdomain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12quality (talk • contribs) 21:15, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

@12quality: If you know where and when it was first published, we can decide which license fit this file: maybe {{PD-USGov}} or {{PD-US no notice}} or {{PD-US-no renewal}}. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:53, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

@Yann: Ok, great. how do I do that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12quality (talk • contribs) 19:34, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

@12quality: Just edit the file description page. Please add all the details about publication, etc. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:44, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of File:S East Geology.jpg

Hi! Can I ask what the copyright problem was with File:S East Geology.jpg? I nominated it myself back in July, and then un-nominated it when the public domain source was properly identified. I seem to recall that there were some lingering issues with how it was credited (something about being a derivative of another image, long since deleted?), but unfortunately I can't see the details any more, now that it's been deleted. Thanks! -- Perey (talk) 03:11, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

@Perey: Hi, Can you please add the source, the date, and the author, as well as for File:Geological map of Great Britain.jpg? Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:28, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for restoring those—I never got to see the older one until now! As it says at the bottom, the source is Stanford's Geological Atlas, and the map itself is by Horace B. Woodward. Stanford published many volumes with very similar maps: Example 1 (nearly identical), Example 2, Example 3.

There are two difficulties, though:

1. Now that I see it, the full map is in fact a file taken from the website of Dr Ian West. (That's what I thought had happened, back in July, and is why I made the deletion nomination then.) Note I say the file, not the map. Though Dr West puts his name at the bottom and says it's "after" Woodward's map, I can't for the life of me see what's different. But there could be some of Dr West's original work in this particular file, it could be a copyvio, and so we really ought to replace it with an authentic copy of an original.
2. Finding a good-quality original is difficult. The one copy that the Internet Archive has of Stanford's Geological Atlas] is missing this precise map, the frontispiece according to the contents. Their other Stanford volumes have similar but older maps. Google Image Search turns up various blurry copies, plus some good ones... that credit Dr West. And frankly, Dr West's is a very nicely cleaned-up copy.

So. The map itself is by Horace B. Woodward and is PD-old, but this specific copy was prepared by Dr Ian West, and may possibly have some copyrightable work of his own in it. I really don't know what to do here! -- Perey (talk) 14:58, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

@Perey: I created a Creator template, a category for the author, and updated the license. I also uploaded File:Geological map of Great Britain, 1878.jpg, an older but bigger version of the same map. You may want to update your crop from this file, or you could use a crop of File:Geological Survey Map of Great Britain, Sheet 2 South.jpg (use the CropTool), a much bigger and more recent map. Everything seems to be in order now. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:37, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

File:TJslezanopava logo.jpg

Is there any instructions on how to do this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Veny213 (talk • contribs) 15:56, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

@Veny213: Hi,

The copyright holder must send a permission for a free license. Please see COM:VRT for the details. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:19, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Consultation about deletion of the logo of the baseball team Toros de Herrera de Panamá

Greetings friend Yann I have received notification that the logo of the Panama Toros de Herrera Baseball team has been deleted, which has been placed with the intention of collaboration so that it can be incorporated into this information system. Briefly I explain: In the information on the Professional Baseball League of Panama. The teams that belong to this league appear, which are made up of: Metropolitan Eagles, Astronauts from Los Santos, Federals from Chiriquí and Toros de Herrera, These baseball teams have no information on Wikipedia.

My idea is to provide the information about them within Wikipedida, so that in the Information Sheets, their logo and all the relevant information that we wish to contribute appears.

The Toros de Herrera Team was champion of the Caribbean Series of the year 2019, as you can verify.

So my interest is to fill in the relevant data of the team in said information including its Logo, which the organization has allowed me to incorporate in the Wikimedia Commos with the rights released.

I appreciate very much the one that allows to release this logo, to be able to complete the information of the team. In addition, I would appreciate any advice or help that you provide me, which will be greatly appreciated.

I also send you some information so you can verify, Eliasg0974 --Eliasg0974 (talk) 01:42, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

@Eliasg0974: Hi,

To publish such a file on Commons, you need the written permission from the copyright holder. If you have such a permission, please see COM:VRT for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:14, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:개자지.jpg

Sir, I don't understand why you would delete this file. It was in use on a Wikipedia. Pack My Box (talk) 03:14, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

@Pack My Box: See COM:PENIS. Yann (talk) 19:15, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

@Yann: See COM:INUSE. Pack My Box (talk) 19:22, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

@Pack My Box: Deletion was also requested by the uploader. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:25, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

At Commons:Deletion requests/File talk:불알.jpg the same user requested their file be deleted but you closed it as "keep". This is very inconsistent. Please restore the file that was in use on another wiki. Thank you. Pack My Box (talk) 19:36, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

@Pack My Box: OK, I think I mixed up the DRs. I restored the file. Sorry for the inconvenience. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:41, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Deleted content

Hello Yann, I am new on wiki commons and I am writing you to seek your help regarding the following files that have been reported for delation and/or deleted.

• File:INTERSECTION-COVER-UK 1 Ph.-Intersection-Magazine.jpg,
• File:GQ France cover.jpg,
• File:Magazine cover.jpg,
• File:Crash Magazine yorgoandco.jpg.

All files are books or magazine covers. Yorgo&Co studio for whom I work authorised me to release the image work under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0. The images are already published on the company website www.yorgo.co. (I only cropped them in some cases). I wish to upload other files and hope you could help me to avoid mistakes. Should I fill a VRT for each image ? Thank you for your time and help. --Qhfofi (talk) 09:41, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

@Qhfofi: Hi,

On Wikimedia Commons, all files can be used for any purpose, including commercial ones, therefore non-commercial licenses are not allowed. Please see COM:L for more details. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:18, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

User:ThomasFan707

This user seems to be a sockpuppet of "User:WikiLoverFan1007", perhaps it would be wise to go over their deletion requests as they (generally) seem to be of the same type of vandalism. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 22:54, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

 Done All reverted. This vandalism should have been prevented by CU doing proper duty. :( Yann (talk) 21:15, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ImmaDie

Hi Yann, do you care to elaborate your closure with a keep despite the blatant copyvios of a serial uploader of copyvios? Please have a look at meta:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#CharmenderDeol for context. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 06:18, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

@AFBorchert: Oops, it seems I closed this DR a bit too fast. I deleted all files. Thanks for your help, Yann (talk) 16:05, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Great, thank you! --AFBorchert (talk) 17:00, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

You deleted pictures that I took

Good day In a file deletion on September 11, 3 uploaded images that I had obtained from the internet and uploaded to 3 articles were deleted. I understand the reasons and accept the policies of Wikimedia Commons

That same day 8 photographs that I myself took and uploaded were deleted, of which I don't understand why they were deleted if I have all the rights and they were even uploaded to wikimedia rather than to a website.

I wait for an answer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garlock1 (talk • contribs) 19:41, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

@Garlock1: Hi,

I deleted your pictures because they are copyright violations, or appear to be so. Either upload the original pictures with full EXIF data if they are yours, or the copyright holder has to send a permission via COM:VRT. Additionally it could help if you give the file names, so I could look more closely, and give you a detailed answer. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:33, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

@Garlock1: Is your name Guillermo De Avila? I found it in the EXIF metadata of some of your files. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:35, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

@King of Hearts:  :@Yann: Hi

No, no, my name is Cristhian García, I work in the same institution as Guillermo de Avila, who is in charge of the Photography department, so the teams are under her name.

I make a list of the files and attach details of the photographs, to verify that I have the rights to upload them.

• File: Plaza San Juan Bautista La Salle Laguna.jpg

Authors: Guillermo de Avila Capture date: 02/26/2014 1:36 pm Copyright: Servicios Fotográficos Camera Model: Canon EOS 60D

• File: La Salle Laguna University Facade.jpg

Authors: Guillermo de Avila Capture date: 01/23/2017 09:28 am Copyright: Servicios Fotográficos Camera Model: Canon EOS 60D

• File: La salle university facade at night.jpg

Authors: Guillermo de Avila Capture date: 04/05/2017 07:17 am Copyright: Servicios Fotográficos Camera Model: Canon EOS 60D

For the archives of Antonio Attolini Murra we made a contract with Melchor Cadena who facilitated his studio and his team to take the photographs, I insist, of which we have all the rights.

The only infractions to the rules were applied from September 11 to the date, in which I tried to post photos that were on the internet but did not check their licenses.

I would appreciate the reestablishment of the previous photographs that if they had everything in order. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garlock1 (talk • contribs) 19:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

@Garlock1: Hi,

Please sign with ~~~~.

As for any document for which you are not the personal copyright holder, for the files to be undeleted, the legal representative of the institution has to send a permission via COM:VRT. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Ghandi's son in New York

Hello, please see c:File:Ghandi's zoon in New York, Bestanddeelnr 901-7744.jpg. The caption in Dutch reads: "Ghandi's son in New York." Since I assume you are better informed than me on the topic of the Ghandi family, and since Mahatma had more than one son: do you know which son we are looking at? Best regards, Jeff5102 (talk) 09:26, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

@Jeff5102: Hi,

I doubt he is one of Mahatma Gandhi's sons. en:Harilal Gandhi vaguely looks like the man in the picture, but I don't think he went to USA, or any of his brothers. He could be one of his grandson (en:Kanu Gandhi (scientist), en:Arun Manilal Gandhi), but none match the age and date of this picture (with a spelling error). So either the date is wrong, or he is another person. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:24, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

File:I Wish to Say.jpg and File:Oring Headshot.jpg

Hey, this is mostly my fault as I forgot to add a license when handling the ticket. But in the future, any file with a VRT confirmation but no license should be referred to COM:ON for verification of its status rather than being deleted. Cheers, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:57, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Contested undeletion

I see you have restored the hoax image File:AflagforIraq.svg. What is the appropriate forum for requesting its redeletion? GPinkerton (talk) 18:20, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

I have a doubt

Hi, again! Many images from the Banknotes of Brazilian real category have problems. For example: File:50 Brazil real Second Obverse.jpg.

1. The description has {{Own}}, which is not true. The author is the Central Bank of Brazil.
2. Consequently the images are not in CC BY-SA 4.0 ({{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}). All these images should have {{Money-BR}}.

But there's another problem. The template says:

"All images must contain the expression "SEM VALOR" placed on the picture diagonally"

Edu! (talk) 19:00, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

@Edu!: Hi,

1. You can change the license with COM:VFC.

2. This is not a copyright issue, so we don't care. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:07, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

File:Binnein2018.jpg

I noticed you deleted the image I uploaded, but you made a mistake on your part because it has the license to where the image can be uploaded onto here. I guess you didn't check for the Creative Commons icon to where the image was originally uploaded. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 16:40, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Bonsoir Yann, there is in fact a tiny CC icon with a link to the licence on the right side below the last image here. See also COM:WHERE#Tistory. De728631 (talk) 17:06, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

 Done @Btspurplegalaxy: Could you please add categories? Thanks, Yann (talk) 17:12, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Your deletions and comments on my discussion page

Hello Yann, the w:Mathematical Research Institute of Oberwolfach states [https:opc.mfo.de]] here, that the lowres pictures on their website marked with copyright MFO may be used under the terms of Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Germany. This applies to the deleted files

• File:Karl-August Keil MFO 1981.jpg,
• File:Inge und Karl-August Keil MFO 1981.jpg
• as well as to File:Bodo Pareigis.jpg. As to File:Günther Hämmerlin.jpg, which is not marked with copyright MFO, MFO OPC has answered my request to use this file by mail on March 4 2020 with the following:

Sehr geehrter Herr Wenninger,

Herr Fischer hat die Erlaubnis zur Nutzung der kleinen Auflösung gegeben (s.u.).

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jennifer Hinneburg

--- Jennifer Hinneburg Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach Schwarzwaldstr. 9-11 77709 Oberwolfach

photos@mfo.de opc.mfo.de

Am 04.03.2020 um 12:02 schrieb Gerd Fischer:
> Liebe Frau Hinneburg:
>
> Natürlich bin ich einverstanden, aber nach den üblichen Regeln sollte die Quelle des Bildes genannt werden!
>
> Beste Grüße
>
> Gerd Fischer
>
> Am 04.03.2020 um 11:40 schrieb Oberwolfach Photo Collection (Jennifer Hinneburg):
>> Lieber Herr Fischer,
>>
>> wir haben eine Fotoanfrage zu folgendem Bild von Ihnen:
>>
>> https://opc.mfo.de/detail?photo_id=19755
>>
>> Herr Wenninger möchte das Foto gerne für einen Wikipedia Artikel über Prof. Hämmerlin verwenden. Da laut unseren Aufzeichnungen die Weitergabeberechtigung für dieses Foto beim MFO liegt, habe ich das Bild in kleiner Auflösung weitergegeben. Nun ist sich Herr Wenninger unsicher darüber, ob er das Foto verwenden kann und möchte gerne auch Ihre Zustimmung.
>>
>> Erlauben Sie die Herausgabe des Bildes?
>>
>> Vielen Dank und Grüße
>> Jennifer Hinneburg
>> ---
>> Jennifer Hinneburg
>> Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach
>> Schwarzwaldstr. 9-11
>> 77709 Oberwolfach
>>
>> photos@mfo.de
>> opc.mfo.de

If this shouldn't suffice, please go ahead and delete the files, you have not already deleted. --Boobarkee (talk) 10:43, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

@Boobarkee: Hi,

I didn't see the page where it is stated that these images are under a free license. I have undeleted and license reviewed them. This should be done for every images from an external website with such a permission. And sorry, I don't speak German. For the last 2 images, I am not sure what to do. Could you please ask on COM:VPC confirmation that they are OK? Regards, Yann (talk) 14:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

The uploaded files refer to "MFO Copyright" as do the web-pages, which are stated to be the source. Shouldn't you have double checked before you pressed the delete button? The file File:Bodo Pareigis.jpg is MFO Copyright as well. Could you please make sure, that it will not be deleted? The Mail in German states, that MFO has requested permission form the author, Prof. Dr. Gerd Fischer, which the latter has granted. Please make sure, that this will not deleted as well! Regards, --Boobarkee (talk) 14:19, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

 Done Sorry for the deletions, but small images from external sources are in most cases copyright violations. We delete thousands of them daily. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:24, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Why was sakurai photo removed

It was public domain. Was it not in Japan? Aalji (talk) 01:44, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

@Aalji: Hi,

I suppose you are taking about File:MasahiroSakurai.png. This is not your own work, therefore you are not allowed to upload it here without a written permission from the copyright holder. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:27, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Ok, so if it's public domain I still have to ask permission? Aalji (talk) 11:38, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

@Aalji: Well, this image is not in the public domain. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:39, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Ok thanks. The smash bros wiki lied I guess Aalji (talk) 19:35, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Skeleton exam

The skeleton contains a skull at the top. --The completion of the body (talk) 03:26, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

@The completion of the body: Hi, Could you explain what you are talking about? Regards, Yann (talk) 07:28, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

AzMarie Livingston

Bonjour Yann ! Ravie de te revoir par ici. Merci pour la suppression. Pourrais-tu regarder si je suis dans les clous pour ceci

Je ne suis aps trop sûre :

AzMarie Livingston drawtober 2021

. Merci !! Nattes à chat (talk) 12:26, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

@Nattes à chat: Bonjour ! Comment vas-tu ?

As-tu utilisé plusieurs images pour dessiner ce portrait ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 18:04, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Ça va. je me suis inspirée de https://i.pinimg.com/originals/d9/8b/8f/d98b8f49981b96dce4befa91afc5677f.jpg, https://i.pinimg.com/736x/56/d9/15/56d915180951c361b86982566135f414--azmarie-livingston-andro.jpg et https://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/americasnexttopmodel/images/4/48/Azmarie-livingston.jpg/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/250?cb=20150124202753

Bises, Nattes à chat (talk) 09:12, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Pour les images suivantes je vais prendre des captures still pour éviter les mêmes soucis. Dis moi si c'est ok ou pas selon toi, sinon supprime la photo. Nattes à chat (talk) 09:14, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

@Nattes à chat: Je pense que c'est bon. Ton dessin n'est pas une reproduction d'une photo en particulier. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 21:11, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Cake Logo Claim thing

hey, umm so about the logo from the cake series from FXX, well is just that i'm new to editing wiki n' stuff, but i just found it white on https://www.themoviedb.org/tv/93035-cake/images/logos?image_language=en ,Then Edited it black and thats it, don't know much about logos from series having copyright though, thanks 21:17, 7 October 2021

The 3D and backlight effect seems too complex to upload this logo without a permission from the copyright holder. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:20, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

So i add the 3D Purple One? (still waiting for a answer or something). — Preceding unsigned comment added by SomeOtherDud (talk • contribs) 21:27, 8 October 2021 (UTC) (UTC)

@SomeOtherDud: No, you are not allowed to upload this file without a written permission from the copyright holder. Please sign your messages. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:27, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

i don't have any relation with FXX, again this is new to me, SomeOtherDud|22:31, 8 October 2021 (UTC)}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by SomeOtherDud (talk • contribs) 22:31, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Photo of Rita C. Richey courtesy of Wayne State University web page.jpg

Good evening, Yann: I emailed Dr. Rita C. Richey and she says I am free to use the picture since it is just a shot that her husband had taken of her and it has no copyright.

How should I proceed from here? I anticipate your speedy reply.

Thanks in advance. Andrea — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrea Peart (talk • contribs) 22:06, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

@Andrea Peart: Please follow the procedure at COM:VRT. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:15, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

File:'Maji Maji Rebellion memorial', Kilwa Kivinje.jpg.

Thank you for the copyright message. I did email the person who is the author of the image and he gave permission for it to be used with the correct attribution to him, as I have done in uploading the image, viz;

"You are welcome to use my photos for instructive purposes described in your email below, thank you for asking. I strongly believe teaching history is important and support your efforts. I have put up many photos that you may have already seen. The link is shown below. Steve Steve Hallgren, RPCV Tanzania 2017-2019 Morocco 1972-1974 https://hellofrompeacecorpstanzania.wordpress.com/"

I have emailed him once again about this, but there isn't much else I can do. Ad scribendum (talk) 09:07, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

@Ad scribendum: Please follow the procedure at COM:VRT. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:28, 8 October 2021 (UTC)