The Open Philanthropy Blog | Open Philanthropy                    @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20211007021926cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/modules/system/system.base.css?qxfjis"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20211007021926cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/modules/system/system.menus.css?qxfjis"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20211007021926cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/modules/system/system.messages.css?qxfjis"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20211007021926cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/modules/system/system.theme.css?qxfjis");   @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20211007021926cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/modules/contrib/jquery_update/replace/ui/themes/base/minified/jquery.ui.core.min.css?qxfjis"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20211007021926cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/modules/contrib/jquery_update/replace/ui/themes/base/minified/jquery.ui.theme.min.css?qxfjis"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20211007021926cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/modules/contrib/jquery_update/replace/ui/themes/base/minified/jquery.ui.accordion.min.css?qxfjis");   @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20211007021926cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/modules/contrib/comment_notify/comment_notify.css?qxfjis"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20211007021926cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/modules/comment/comment.css?qxfjis"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20211007021926cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/modules/field/theme/field.css?qxfjis"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20211007021926cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/modules/contrib/footnotes/footnotes.css?qxfjis"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20211007021926cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/modules/custom/grants_summary/grants_summary.css?qxfjis"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20211007021926cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/modules/node/node.css?qxfjis"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20211007021926cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/modules/search/search.css?qxfjis"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20211007021926cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/modules/user/user.css?qxfjis"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20211007021926cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/modules/contrib/views/css/views.css?qxfjis"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20211007021926cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/modules/contrib/caption_filter/caption-filter.css?qxfjis"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20211007021926cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/modules/contrib/ckeditor/css/ckeditor.css?qxfjis");   @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20211007021926cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/modules/contrib/ctools/css/ctools.css?qxfjis"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20211007021926cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/modules/contrib/typogrify/typogrify.css?qxfjis"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20211007021926cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/modules/contrib/content_type_extras/css/content_type_extras.css?qxfjis");   @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20211007021926cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/themes/op_basic/styles/css/global/normalize.css?qxfjis"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20211007021926cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/themes/op_basic/styles/css/global/op-fonts.css?qxfjis"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20211007021926cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/themes/op_basic/styles/css/global/html.css?qxfjis"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20211007021926cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/themes/op_basic/styles/css/global/meanmenu.css?qxfjis"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20211007021926cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/themes/op_basic/styles/css/global/global.css?qxfjis"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20211007021926cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/themes/op_basic/styles/css/pages/pages.css?qxfjis"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20211007021926cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/themes/op_basic/styles/css/pages/custom.css?qxfjis");   @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20211007021926cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/themes/op_basic/styles/css/global/admin.css?qxfjis");                                        Jump to Navigation            Research & IdeasCause Selection Notable Lessons Cause Reports Conversations History of Philanthropy  Focus AreasU.S. Policy Criminal Justice Reform Farm Animal Welfare Macroeconomic Stabilization Policy Immigration Policy Land Use Reform Global Catastrophic Risks Biosecurity and Pandemic Preparedness Potential Risks from Advanced Artificial Intelligence Scientific Research Global Health & Development Other areas  GivingGrants Database Current Priorities Guide for Grant Seekers Grantmaking Stages  About UsWho We Are Vision & Values Openness Progress to Date Team Press Kit  Blog Get InvolvedContact Us Stay Updated Working at Open Phil          Search form  Search                     Home  The Open Philanthropy Blog             New Roles in Global Health and Wellbeing   June 29, 2021 byOtis Reid   Open Philanthropy is expanding and we are recruiting a number of talented new hires to help us direct philanthropic funding in new-to-OP causes and to join the team that identifies new areas for grantmaking. Our Global Health and Wellbeing team – which works to improve life through causes like global development, scientific research, and farm animal welfare – is ramping up its grantmaking. The GHW team directed more than $200M in grants in 2020 and we expect that number to rise substantially in the years to come. 

 We’re looking for two types of roles to help us direct billions of dollars of new giving over the coming years. First, we’re looking for experts who will lead Open Philanthropy’s giving in new cause areas we’ve identified as potential focus areas. We’re hiring two new Program Officers, in South Asian air quality and global aid advocacy. Each of these Program Officers will identify specific grants and grantees that we believe can beat our 1,000x social return on investment bar.1 We expect these positions to be filled by grantmakers who combine deep expertise in their area, strategic vision, and a quantitative mindset. We’re looking for people who already know many potential grantee organizations and can make reasoned and balanced arguments about why their approach is likely to clear our high bar for giving. We think finding the right grantmaker is a key ingredient to our potential impact in these causes, so we may not end up going into them if we can’t find the right people.

 Read More   POSTED IN:  Permalink   Comments 0 Leave a Comment     Report on Whether AI Could Drive Explosive Economic Growth    June 25, 2021 byTom Davidson    */   Since 1900, the global economy has grown by about 3% each year, meaning that it doubles in size every 20–30 years. I’ve written a report assessing whether significantly faster growth might occur this century. Specifically, I ask whether growth could be ten times faster, with the global economy growing by 30% each year. This would mean it doubled in size every 2–3 years; I call this possibility ‘explosive growth’. 

 The report builds on the work of my colleague, David Roodman. Although recently growth has been fairly steady, in the distant past it was much slower. David developed a mathematical model for extrapolating this pattern into the future; after calibration to data for the last 12,000 years, the model predicts that the global economy will grow ever faster over time and that explosive growth is a couple of decades away! My report assesses David’s model, and compares it to other methods for extrapolating growth into the future.

 At first glance, it might seem that explosive growth is implausible — that it is somehow absurd or economically naive. Contrary to this view, I offer three considerations from economic history and growth theory that suggest advanced AI could drive explosive growth. In brief:

 Read More   POSTED IN:  Permalink   Comments 0 Leave a Comment     Open Philanthropy’s New Co-CEO   June 16, 2021 byHolden Karnofsky   We’re excited to announce that Open Philanthropy co-founder Alexander Berger has been promoted to co-CEO!

 For some time now, Alexander has been the primary leader for most of our work on causes focused on maximizing verifiable impact within our lifetimes, while I have increasingly focused on causes directly aimed at affecting the very long-run future. I felt that Alexander should be promoted to recognize this reality and formalize the division of labor at Open Philanthropy. I am confident that he is an excellent fit for this role.

 Read More   POSTED IN:  Permalink   Comments 0 Leave a Comment     New Staff in Operations, Programs, and Research (2021)   June 3, 2021 byGabriela Romero   Since our last hiring update, we have had a lot of new staff join Open Philanthropy. I’d like to use this post to introduce the new members of our team. We’re excited to have them! 

 If you are interested in joining our team, check out open positions on our Working at Open Phil page. 

 Read More   POSTED IN:  Permalink   Comments 0 Leave a Comment     Our Progress in 2020 and Plans for 2021   April 29, 2021 byHolden Karnofsky   This post compares our progress with the goals we set forth a year ago, and lays out our plans for the coming year.

 Read More   POSTED IN:  Permalink   Comments 1 Leave a Comment     Report on Semi-informative Priors   March 25, 2021 byTom Davidson   One of Open Phil’s major focus areas is technical research and policy work aimed at reducing potential risks from advanced AI.

 To inform this work, I have written a report developing one approach to forecasting when artificial general intelligence (AGI) will be developed. By AGI, I mean computer program(s) that can perform virtually any cognitive task as well as any human, for no more money than it would cost for a human to do it. The field of AI is largely understood to have begun in Dartmouth in 1956, and since its inception one of its central aims has been to develop AGI.1

 Read More   POSTED IN:  Permalink   Comments 0 Leave a Comment     Our Approach to Recruiting a Strong Team   January 5, 2021 byAnya Hunt   Open Philanthropy’s ability to give effectively to the world’s most important and neglected causes hinges on the collective strength and expertise of our team. As such, we’ve thought extensively about how we can identify those who could most meaningfully contribute to Open Philanthropy’s mission, and how we can craft a recruitment process that encourages them to apply.

 Recruiting Manager Anya Hunt sat down with Communications Officer Michael Levine to talk about Open Philanthropy’s approach to recruiting, the role of work tests in the application process, and measures we are taking to diversify our pipeline and attract talent from different communities. The questions and answers have been edited lightly for clarity.

 Generally speaking, how does Open Philanthropy approach the recruitment process? There are parallels to the way we approach grantmaking. Each hire is an investment — we’re making a bet that this person will help Open Phil more effectively carry out our mission. In both cases, we’re trying to be evidence-based where we can, but we’re also trying to minimize bureaucracy. We try to hold ourselves to rigorous standards of decision-making, accounting for our biases wherever possible. We can only be as effective as the people we hire. So we’re willing to invest an unusual amount of time and energy into sourcing and vetting candidates. 

 How does that mindset impact the recruiting process? Mainly, it causes us to put work tests at the center of the process. After some basic screening, the first thing candidates do, typically, before we interview them, before anything else happens, is to take at least one work test, and we’ll pay them an honorarium to complete it. Then we evaluate it blind and generally admit people to the next round only if they meet a certain preset standard. This results in an unusually long process — that’s both an upside and a downside. It’s a downside for the obvious reasons, but it’s an upside because we think making a hire, and accepting an offer, is a really important decision on both our end and the candidate’s. Because onboarding new staff can be very costly to both us and the new hire, we aim to be highly confident in every offer we make (though of course we do still make mistakes).

 Read More   POSTED IN:  Permalink   Comments 0 Leave a Comment     2020 Allocation to GiveWell Top Charities   December 17, 2020 byHolden Karnofsky   We believe that every life has equal value — and that philanthropic dollars can go particularly far by helping those who are living in poverty by global standards. Currently, many of the best giving opportunities we’ve found in the Global Health and Development focus area are recommended by GiveWell, a nonprofit dedicated to finding outstanding giving opportunities and publishing its full analysis to help donors decide where to give. (Learn more about our relationship with GiveWell here.)

 GiveWell recently announced its recommendations for giving, a list that focuses on programs with a strong track record and excellent cost-effectiveness, can use additional funding to expand their core programs, and are exceptionally transparent. We have allocated an additional $100 million for GiveWell top charities, GiveWell standout charities, and GiveWell Incubation Grants in the year-end period (beyond what we’ve already granted to GiveWell-recommended charities earlier this year).

 Read More   POSTED IN:  Permalink   Comments 3 Leave a Comment     Our AI governance grantmaking so far   December 16, 2020 byLuke Muehlhauser   When the Soviet Union began to fracture in 1991, the world was forced to reckon with the first collapse of a nuclear superpower in history.1 The USSR was home to more than 27,000 nuclear weapons, more than one million citizens working at nuclear facilities, and over 600 metric tons of nuclear fissile materials.2 It seemed inevitable that some of these weapons, experts, and materials would end up in terrorist cells or hostile states,3 especially given a series of recent failed attempts at non-proliferation cooperation between the US and the USSR.

 Read More   POSTED IN:  Permalink   Comments 1 Leave a Comment     Suggestions for Individual Donors from Open Philanthropy Staff - 2020   November 25, 2020 byHolden Karnofsky   Last year, the year before, the year before that, the year before that, and the year before that, we published a set of suggestions for individual donors looking for organizations to support. This year, we are repeating the practice and publishing updated suggestions from Open Philanthropy program staff who chose to provide them.

 Similar caveats to previous years apply:  These are reasonably strong options in causes of interest, and shouldn’t be taken as outright recommendations (i.e., it isn’t necessarily the case that the person making the suggestion thinks they’re the best option available across all causes). The recommendations below fall within the cause areas Open Philanthropy has chosen to focus on. While this list does not expressly include GiveWell’s top charities, we believe those organizations to be the most cost-effective, evidence-backed giving opportunities available to donors today, and expect that some readers of this post might want to give to them. Many of these recommendations appear here because they are particularly good fits for individual donors - due to being able to make use of fairly arbitrary amounts of donations from individuals, and in some cases because the recommender thought they’d be particularly likely to appeal to readers. This shouldn’t be seen as a list of our strongest grantees overall (although of course there may be overlap). Our explanations for why these are strong giving opportunities are very brief and informal, and we don’t expect individuals to be persuaded by them unless they put a lot of weight on the judgment of the person making the suggestion. In addition, we’d add that these recommendations are made by the individual program officers or teams cited, and do not necessarily represent my (Holden’s) personal or Open Phil’s institutional “all things considered” view.

 Note that we are no longer including “Why we haven’t fully funded it” information for each option. In most cases, these grants are coming from limited per-focus-area budgets.

 Read More   POSTED IN:  Permalink   Comments 2 Leave a Comment    Pages1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 … next › »           Stay Updated   Email me new blog posts

  Blog RSS feed

  More information     Recent blog posts        New Roles in Global Health and Wellbeing    Report on Whether AI Could Drive Explosive Economic Growth    Open Philanthropy’s New Co-CEO    New Staff in Operations, Programs, and Research (2021)    Our Progress in 2020 and Plans for 2021        Archives    All posts

   2021 June 2021    June 2021    June 2021    June 2021    June 2021   April 2021    April 2021   March 2021    March 2021   January 2021    January 2021  2020 December 2020    December 2020    December 2020   November 2020    November 2020   September 2020    September 2020   June 2020    June 2020   May 2020    May 2020    May 2020   March 2020    March 2020  2019 December 2019    December 2019    December 2019   November 2019    November 2019   October 2019    October 2019   August 2019    August 2019    August 2019   July 2019    July 2019   June 2019    June 2019   April 2019    April 2019    April 2019    April 2019   March 2019    March 2019    February 2019    February 2019  2018 December 2018    December 2018    December 2018    December 2018   October 2018    October 2018   September 2018    September 2018   May 2018    May 2018   April 2018    April 2018   March 2018    March 2018    March 2018    March 2018   February 2018    February 2018    February 2018   January 2018    January 2018    January 2018    January 2018  2017 December 2017    December 2017    December 2017    December 2017   November 2017    November 2017   October 2017    October 2017   September 2017    September 2017    September 2017    September 2017    September 2017    September 2017   June 2017    June 2017    June 2017    June 2017    June 2017   April 2017    April 2017    April 2017   March 2017    March 2017    March 2017    March 2017   February 2017    February 2017    February 2017  2016 December 2016    December 2016    December 2016    December 2016   October 2016    October 2016   September 2016    September 2016    September 2016    September 2016    September 2016   July 2016    July 2016   June 2016    June 2016    June 2016   May 2016    May 2016    May 2016    May 2016   April 2016    April 2016    April 2016   March 2016    March 2016    March 2016   February 2016    February 2016    February 2016    February 2016    February 2016  2015 December 2015    December 2015   November 2015    November 2015   October 2015    October 2015   September 2015    September 2015    September 2015    September 2015    September 2015    September 2015   August 2015    August 2015    August 2015    August 2015   July 2015    July 2015    July 2015    July 2015    July 2015    July 2015   June 2015    June 2015    June 2015    June 2015   May 2015    May 2015    May 2015    May 2015   April 2015    April 2015    April 2015    April 2015    April 2015    April 2015   March 2015    March 2015    March 2015    March 2015    March 2015   February 2015    February 2015    February 2015    February 2015  2014 October 2014    October 2014    October 2014   September 2014    September 2014    September 2014   August 2014    August 2014   July 2014    July 2014    July 2014   June 2014    June 2014   May 2014    May 2014    May 2014    May 2014    May 2014   April 2014    April 2014    April 2014   March 2014    March 2014    March 2014   January 2014    January 2014    January 2014  2013 December 2013    December 2013   November 2013    November 2013    November 2013   October 2013    October 2013    October 2013    October 2013    October 2013   September 2013    September 2013   July 2013    July 2013    July 2013    July 2013   June 2013    June 2013    June 2013   May 2013    May 2013    May 2013   April 2013    April 2013    April 2013    April 2013   March 2013    March 2013   February 2013    February 2013  2012 September 2012    September 2012    September 2012   July 2012    July 2012   June 2012    June 2012    June 2012    June 2012   May 2012    May 2012    May 2012    May 2012   March 2012    March 2012   February 2012    February 2012    February 2012    February 2012   January 2012    January 2012  2011 October 2011    October 2011   September 2011    September 2011    September 2011    September 2011                 contact us jobs press kit    facebook twitter rss  © Open Philanthropy. Except as otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License. Some images may be copyrighted by others and not licensed for re-use: see image captions or footnotes. Privacy policy         try { clicky.init(100914494); }catch(e){}