After #15946 starting a pruned bitcoin-qt with blockfilterindex=1 will give the error message

Error: A fatal internal error occurred, see debug.log for details

It would be more helpful if it gave what's in the debug.log which is

basic block filter index best block of the index goes beyond pruned data. Please disable the index or reindex (which will download the whole blockchain agai

Just for RSA. Do encrypt and decrypt. Include a bold comment that this should not be used for bulk encryption.

It should be the current best practice (fetch), have proper error handling and resource allocation/deallocation and be in the style of a known answer test.

Welcome to JavaScript community

Describe your change:

• Add an algorithm?
• Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
• Documentation change?

Checklist:

• I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
• This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
• I know that p

Hello spoooopyyy hackers 🎃

This is a Hacktoberfest only issue! 👻

This is also data-sciency!

The Problem

Our English dictionary contains words that aren't English, and does not contain common English words.

Examples of non-common words in the dictionary:

"hlithskjalf",
  "hlorrithi",
  "hlqn",
  "hm",
  "hny",
  "ho",
  "hoactzin",
  "hoactzine

Background

The links to http. proto and annotations. proto no longer exist
Lower versions of GRPC may no longer work with existing code
I cannot access the public IP according to the documentation
Then I upgraded the GRPC to 1.36.0, the os-maven-plugin to 1.6.2, and the protobuf-maven-plugin to 0.6.1, everything was fine

Currently stratumserver has no unit tests. This will improve the quality and allow future commits to be TDD safe. All units will be tested to ensure the module as a unit itself is tested.

Problem:

A common pattern is:

GUARD(s2n_stuffer_skip_write(stuffer, bytes_to_write));
uint8_t* ptr = suffer->blob.data + stuffer->write_cursor - bytes_to_write;

which could be simplified.

Solution:

*ptr could be an *out parameter to s2n_stuffer_skip_write

• Does this change what S2N sends over the wire? No.
• Does this change any public APIs? No.

Clients that support multiple server connections would like to have a way to decide which server connection is best able to handle a query. Servers currently "sort of" expose their load as fees, but there's no real exposure of server load in a useful way. Some parameter should be added to the "server" publication stream that clients can just compare across servers to decide which is most likely to

https://scotthelme.co.uk/a-new-security-header-feature-policy/

I guess it will be easy to add, because we certainly don't use any of these features.
Or maybe "gyroscope" or so may be used by the random number generator in sjcl, but that's all.