Combination deworming (mass drug administration targeting both schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminths) - 2013 report | GiveWell               (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.type='text/javascript';j.src='https://web.archive.org./web/20201023135900/https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl+'';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-MKLT9TL');     jQuery.extend(Drupal.settings, {"basePath":"\/","pathPrefix":"","ajaxPageState":{"theme":"gw_basic","theme_token":"46CHFl970R5Nngjq7R0d4r0z1tVrHEuUwcjvHxZMpFM","js":{"https:\/\/web.archive.org.\/web\/20201023135900\/https:\/\/unpkg.com\/@popperjs\/core@2":1,"https:\/\/web.archive.org.\/web\/20201023135900\/https:\/\/unpkg.com\/tippy.js@6":1,"0":1,"sites\/all\/modules\/contrib\/jquery_update\/replace\/jquery\/1.10\/jquery.min.js":1,"misc\/jquery-extend-3.4.0.js":1,"misc\/jquery-html-prefilter-3.5.0-backport.js":1,"misc\/jquery.once.js":1,"misc\/drupal.js":1,"sites\/all\/modules\/contrib\/jquery_update\/replace\/ui\/ui\/minified\/jquery.ui.core.min.js":1,"sites\/all\/modules\/contrib\/jquery_update\/replace\/ui\/ui\/minified\/jquery.ui.widget.min.js":1,"sites\/all\/modules\/contrib\/jquery_update\/replace\/ui\/external\/jquery.cookie.js":1,"sites\/all\/modules\/contrib\/jquery_update\/replace\/ui\/ui\/minified\/jquery.ui.accordion.min.js":1,"sites\/all\/modules\/contrib\/resp_img\/resp_img.js":1,"sites\/all\/modules\/contrib\/tableofcontents\/js\/jquery.scrollTo-min.js":1,"sites\/all\/modules\/contrib\/tableofcontents\/js\/jquery.localscroll-min.js":1,"sites\/all\/modules\/contrib\/tableofcontents\/js\/tableofcontents.js":1,"sites\/all\/modules\/custom\/givewell_js\/js\/intercom.js":1,"sites\/all\/modules\/custom\/givewell_add_querystring\/js\/givewell_add_querystring.js":1,"sites\/all\/themes\/gw_basic\/scripts\/lib\/modernizr.custom.74085.js":1,"sites\/all\/themes\/gw_basic\/scripts\/lib\/mean-menu\/jquery.meanmenu.min.js":1,"sites\/all\/themes\/gw_basic\/scripts\/lib\/jquery-migrate-1.0.0.js":1,"sites\/all\/themes\/gw_basic\/scripts\/lib\/jquery-validation\/dist\/jquery.validate.min.js":1,"sites\/all\/themes\/gw_basic\/scripts\/lib\/multiselect\/jquery.multiselect.min.js":1,"sites\/all\/themes\/gw_basic\/scripts\/lib\/dropkick.js":1,"sites\/all\/themes\/gw_basic\/scripts\/lib\/jquery.pep.js":1,"sites\/all\/themes\/gw_basic\/scripts\/main.js":1},"css":{"modules\/system\/system.base.css":1,"modules\/system\/system.menus.css":1,"modules\/system\/system.messages.css":1,"modules\/system\/system.theme.css":1,"misc\/ui\/jquery.ui.core.css":1,"misc\/ui\/jquery.ui.theme.css":1,"misc\/ui\/jquery.ui.accordion.css":1,"modules\/aggregator\/aggregator.css":1,"modules\/comment\/comment.css":1,"sites\/all\/modules\/contrib\/date\/date_api\/date.css":1,"modules\/field\/theme\/field.css":1,"sites\/all\/modules\/contrib\/footnotes\/footnotes.css":1,"modules\/node\/node.css":1,"modules\/search\/search.css":1,"modules\/user\/user.css":1,"sites\/all\/modules\/contrib\/views\/css\/views.css":1,"sites\/all\/modules\/contrib\/ckeditor\/css\/ckeditor.css":1,"sites\/all\/modules\/contrib\/ctools\/css\/ctools.css":1,"sites\/all\/modules\/contrib\/taxonomy_access\/taxonomy_access.css":1,"sites\/all\/modules\/contrib\/content_type_extras\/css\/content_type_extras.css":1,"sites\/all\/modules\/contrib\/tableofcontents\/tableofcontents.css":1,"sites\/all\/modules\/contrib\/print\/print_ui\/css\/print_ui.theme.css":1,"sites\/all\/themes\/gw_basic\/styles\/css\/global\/normalize.css":1,"sites\/all\/themes\/gw_basic\/styles\/css\/global\/gw-fonts.css":1,"sites\/all\/themes\/gw_basic\/styles\/css\/global\/html.css":1,"sites\/all\/themes\/gw_basic\/styles\/css\/global\/global.css":1,"sites\/all\/themes\/gw_basic\/styles\/css\/global\/meanmenu.css":1,"sites\/all\/themes\/gw_basic\/styles\/css\/global\/page-layout.css":1,"sites\/all\/themes\/gw_basic\/styles\/css\/global\/html-colors.css":1,"sites\/all\/themes\/gw_basic\/styles\/css\/pages\/pages.css":1,"sites\/all\/themes\/gw_basic\/styles\/css\/pages\/new-home.css":1,"sites\/all\/themes\/gw_basic\/styles\/css\/pages\/new-top-charities.css":1,"sites\/all\/themes\/gw_basic\/styles\/sitesearch.css":1,"sites\/all\/themes\/gw_basic\/styles\/formstack.css":1,"sites\/all\/themes\/gw_basic\/styles\/css\/global\/admin.css":1}},"respImg":{"default_suffix":"","current_suffix":false,"forceRedirect":false,"forceResize":false,"reloadOnResize":false,"useDevicePixelRatio":false,"suffixes":{"":1}},"tableofcontents":{"collapse":false,"scroll":true},"urlIsAjaxTrusted":{"\/international\/technical\/programs\/deworming\/2013-report":true}});       Jump to Navigation             GiveWell        Giving EffectivelyGiving 101 Your Donation Can Change Someone's Life The Wrong Donation Can Accomplish Nothing Your Dollar Goes Further Overseas Your Dollar Goes Further When You Fund the Right Program Quick Start Guide  How We WorkWho We Are Process Criteria Transparency Evaluations of GiveWell Research FAQ Core Competencies  Top CharitiesMalaria Consortium Against Malaria Foundation Helen Keller International Deworm the World Initiative SCI Foundation Sightsavers The END Fund GiveDirectly Standout Charities  ResearchCharity Site Visits Notes from Research Conversations Intervention ReportsAlbendazole and Ivermectin to Control Lymphatic Filariasis Alive & Thrive Antiretroviral Therapy to Treat HIV/AIDS Bednet Distribution Breastfeeding Promotion Programs Bridges to Prosperity Cash transfers Cataract Surgery Clean Cookstoves Combination Deworming Community-Based Intervention Packages Community-Based Management of Acute Malnutrition Conditional Subsidies for Seasonal Labor Migration in Northern Bangladesh Condom Promotion and Distribution to Prevent HIV/AIDS Distribution of Eyeglasses in Developing Countries Early Childhood Psychosocial Stimulation Education in Developing Countries Eyeglasses to Improve Workers' Manual Dexterity Immunization Immunization to Prevent Maternal and Neonatal Tetanus Integrated Community Case Management (iCCM) Intermittent preventive treatment of malaria during pregnancy Interventions to Promote Handwashing Iron Fortification Iron Supplementation for School-Age Children Ivermectin to Control Onchocerciasis Mass Distribution of Azithromycin Meningitis A Immunization Non-therapeutic Zinc Supplementation Oral Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV Oral Rehydration Solution Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV Probiotic Supplementation for Preterm Newborns Salt Iodization Sayana® Press Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention SMS Reminders for Vaccination Soft Skills Certification Supplementary Immunization Activities to Prevent Measles Surgery to Repair Obstetric Fistula Syphilis Screening and Treatment During Pregnancy Therapeutic Zinc Supplementation Trachoma Control Treatment of Malaria Tuberculosis Case Finding and Treatment Vitamin A Supplementation Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision (VMMC) HPV Vaccination to Prevent Cervical Cancer IPTi Water Quality  Cost-Effectiveness Analyses Other Charity Reviews GiveWell Incubation Grants  Our Mistakes AboutAbout GiveWell Progress to Date Our Story Our People Official Records Reputation Impact Frequently Asked Questions Donate Contact Us Jobs  UpdatesBlog RSS Feeds Stay Updated           Enter search terms here.   This search returns results from both GiveWell's main site and from the GiveWell Blog. 

  Search form  Search             DonateDonate

            You are hereHome » Research » Intervention Reports » Combination Deworming » 2013 Version Combination deworming (mass drug administration targeting both schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminths) - 2013 report     FacebookTwitter>Print>Email                   We have published a more recent review of this intervention. See our most recent report on combination deworming.

 Published: December 2013

  In a nutshell This page discusses the general case for mass deworming. In general, we focus our discussion on work similar to that of the Schistosomiasis Control Initiative and the Deworm the World Initiative.

 Mass deworming means treating large numbers of people with parasite-killing drugs: praziquantel kills the parasites that cause schistosomiasis, while albendazole kills soil-transmitted helminths. Treatment is cheaper than diagnosis and usually takes place in areas where worms are fairly common. Also, side effects of the drugs are believed to be minor; thus, everyone in a given population (sometimes schoolchildren; sometimes the community at large) is treated, without being individually tested for the presence of infections.

 Mass deworming is generally very inexpensive on a per-person-treated basis (in the range of $0.50). The benefits are potentially major, but also debatable: parasitic infections rarely cause mortality or other acute effects, and the evidence on their impact on quality of life is thin. In brief: 

There is strong evidence that administration of the drugs reduces worm loads, but weaker evidence on the causal relationship between reducing worm loads and improved life outcomes. Evidence for the impact of deworming on short-term general health is thin, especially for soil-transmitted helminth (STH)-only deworming. Most of the potential effects are relatively small, the evidence is mixed, and different approaches have varied effects. We would guess that deworming populations with schistosomiasis and STH (combination deworming) does have some small impacts on general health, but do not believe it has a large impact on health in most cases. We are uncertain that STH-only deworming affects general health. There are two prominent studies arguing that reducing worm infection loads during childhood can have a significant later impact on income. We find these studies to constitute evidence that is suggestive, though not conclusive or necessarily representative (one study was in an area of unusually high worm infections; the other was a study of hookworm eradication, which included many measures other than deworming drugs, in the southern U.S. in the early 20th century). Attempts to estimate the cost-effectiveness of deworming within the disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) framework have been problematic. In 2011, GiveWell found the figures published by the World Health Organization to be off by ~100x due to errors and flawed in other ways even once corrected. Cost-effectiveness calculations are extremely sensitive to many assumptions, and deworming is in the same range of cost-effectiveness as other priority programs we have considered (more).  Previous versions of this page: 

 2009 deworming report 2011 deworming report 2012 deworming report   Table of Contents    What are the infections targeted by mass deworming, i.e., soil-transmitted helminthiasis (STH) and schistosomiasis?  Schistosomiasis Soil-transmitted helminthiasis (STH)   How does mass deworming work? Does mass deworming have a strong track record? What are the benefits of mass deworming?  Impacts on general health  Haemoglobin levels Other impacts on general health Bottom line on impacts on general health   Prevention of potentially severe effects  Schistosomiasis STH   Developmental impacts  Bottom line on developmental effects   Externalities for the untreated Possible negative/offsetting impact   Different versions of the intervention  How often do people need to be treated?   How cost-effective is mass deworming? Is there room for more funding in deworming? Our process for the 2013 update Sources Supplementary Sources     What are the infections targeted by mass deworming, i.e., soil-transmitted helminthiasis (STH) and schistosomiasis? "Schistosomiasis" and "soil-transmitted helminthiasis (STH)" both describe chronic parasitic infections. We discuss each below.

 Schistosomiasis Schistosomiasis involves infection with parasites released by snails and transmitted through the skin when it is exposed to infested water.1 The most common species of schistosoma infections in humans are S. mansoni, S. haematobium, and S. japonicum.2 

  While S. japonicum is present primarily in Asia and the Pacific, S. mansoni and S. haematobium are found in much of the tropics, including Sub-Saharan Africa.3 There is disagreement about how common schistosomiasis infections are; estimates range from 200 million to more than 600 million people infected.4 The Schistosomiasis Control Initiative is the one charity for which we undertook this review that treats schistosomiasis. (The Deworm the World Initiative solely treats STH.) Since the Schistosomiasis Control Initiative works only in Africa, we focus here on the morbidity caused by those species present in Africa, S. mansoni and S. haematobium. S. japonicum is believed by some scholars to be more dangerous than the other strains that cause schistosomiasis.5

 The pathology of schistosomiasis varies by species and infection intensity. S. mansoni tends to infect the intestines, liver, and spleen,6 while S. haematobium typically infects blood vessels near the bladder.7

 People can be infected by many of the worms at once, but schistosomes cannot reproduce inside the body.8 The burden of infections is typically highest in children and gradually declines as people age (even without treatment).9

 In general, the morbidity caused by schistosomiasis arises from the eggs that the parasite lays while it inhabits the human host.10 Symptoms can include: 

 Hematuria (blood in the urine) or dysuria (painful urination);11 anemia and other nutritional deficiencies.12 Because these symptoms can have many causes, particularly in very poor populations (where schistosomiasis tends to be most prevalent), it is difficult to pinpoint the extent to which schistosomiasis contributes to them; the best information we have on this question comes from studies of deworming, which we discuss below. Urinary tract infections and other bladder problems at late stages of the disease, potentially leading to bladder cancer and kidney failure;13 bloody diarrhea, bloody stools, abdominal pain, and liver failure;14 death.15 As discussed below, death due to schistosomiasis is quite rare; we have no good quantification of the contribution of schistosomiasis to non-fatal problems along these lines. Developmental effects. There is some evidence that schistosomiasis and/or STH impair development and can lower quality of life over the long term. We discuss this further below. Some, but not all, symptoms of schistosomiasis are reversible with treatment.16

 Soil-transmitted helminthiasis (STH)  Soil-transmitted helminthiasis (STH) includes trichuriasis (or whipworm infection), hookworm infection, and ascariasis (or roundworm infection). Each is estimated to affect the following number of people worldwide:17 

Trichuriasis: 26 million people Hookworm: 60 million people Ascariasis: 58 million people The ascariasis and trichuriasis worms feed on the contents of the intestines, while hookworms feed on host blood in the small intestine, moving frequently and leaving small bleeding sores behind.18 

 People can be, and often are, infected by multiple worms (and multiple species of worms) at once, but worms cannot reproduce in the body.19 

 The prevailing understanding of soil-transmitted helminths is that many cases are asymptomatic and that morbidity depends on the intensity of infection.20 Symptoms can include: 

Anemia and other nutritional deficiencies.21 Because these symptoms can have many causes, particularly in very poor populations (where STHs tend to be most prevalent), it is difficult to pinpoint the extent to which STHs contribute to them; the best information we have on this question comes from studies of deworming, which we discuss below.  Intestinal obstruction,22 inflammation of the colon,23 and death.24 As discussed below, these symptoms are generally rare and (with the exception of death) brief in duration. Developmental effects. There is some evidence that schistosomiasis and/or STH impair development and can lower quality of life over the long term. We discuss this further below. How does mass deworming work? Mass deworming is intended for areas with fairly high prevalence of the infections discussed here; people are treated without being individually tested. 

For STH, the World Health Organization recommends treatment with albendazole or mebendazole, with frequency of administration varying with prevalence of infection.25 For schistosomiasis, the World Health Organization recommends treating school-aged children and other at-risk populations with praziquantel, with frequency of administration varying with prevalence of infection.26 Distributions sometimes target school-age children and sometimes target the population at large (for example, see our review of the Schistosomiasis Control Initiative). The Disease Control Priorities Report states that schools provide a strong infrastructure and that teachers can be trained to deliver drugs safely.27 

 A fuller picture of the process can be gained from our notes on our visit to a stakeholders meeting for a national deworming program and a demonstration deworming, as guests of the Schistosomiasis Control Initiative.

  Does mass deworming have a strong track record? Strong evidence suggests that mass deworming reduces the prevalence of the infections discussed here. 

There are two Cochrane reviews of randomized control trials of mass drug treatments for schistosomiasis (primarily using praziquantel, though occasionally metrifonate or oxamniquine). They both conclude that praziquantel is effective in treating schistosomiasis.28 A 2000 meta-analysis found that mass treatment with albendazole was effective in decreasing the prevalence of all three soil-transmitted helminths, though more so for ascariasis than hookworm or trichuriasis.29What are the benefits of mass deworming? As discussed above, the consequences of schistosomiasis/STH fall into three categories:

 Impacts on general health such as anemia and other nutritional deficiencies. Because these symptoms can have many causes, particularly in very poor populations, it is difficult to pinpoint the extent to which STH and schistosomiasis contribute to them; the best information we have on this question comes from studies of deworming. Severe symptoms such as intestinal obstruction and major organ damage. These occur in a small proportion of those infected. Developmental effects. There is some evidence that schistosomiasis and/or STH impair development and can lower quality of life over the long term. We address each of these separately below, and then discuss other possible effects about which less is known.

  Impacts on general health In this section, we first discuss the effect of deworming on haemoglobin levels (low haemoglobin indicates anemia).30 This is because haemoglobin levels are the general health result for which we have, by far, the most and highest-quality evidence, and a discussion of haemoglobin is illustrative of some general problems with assessing the evidence regarding the benefits of deworming.

 We then discuss the evidence we have seen on other immediate impacts of deworming; this evidence is very limited.

 Haemoglobin levels We have examined several literature reviews and studies discussing the impact of deworming on changes in haemoglobin levels. We focus below on three reviews, two of them Cochrane reviews and one of them an especially transparent non-Cochrane review, as well as a large, recent study conducted in India (where the Deworm the World Initiative operates):

 Danso-Appiah et al. 2008 is one of the two Cochrane reviews discussing treatment of schistosomiasis. (The other, Saconato and Atallah 2009, does not address haemoglobin effects.) The impact of treatment on changes in haemoglobin is not discussed in the summary, but several sub-analyses address it: One study of combination deworming (albendazole and praziquantel) found an effect of +2.4 g/L.31 One study of schistosomiasis deworming with praziquantel found an effect of +1.1 g/L.32 Two studies of schistosomiasis deworming with metrifonate each found an effect of +3 g/L.33 Another literature review notes that metrifonate is also partially effective against hookworm, so these results cannot be attributed to schistosomiasis-only treatment; they may be more appropriately attributed to combination deworming.34We have looked up each of these four studies and determined that each of them was pre-screened: each examined the impact of treatment on infected individuals as opposed to the impact of treatment on the general population.35 

  Smith and Brooker 2010 investigates the question of whether haemoglobin effects are stronger in populations with higher prevalence of hookworm, and thus focuses on studies that can be used to help address this question.36 It does not appear to support its hypothesis that hookworm prevalence can predict the size of haemoglobin effects, but it does find a +2.37 g/L effect for combination deworming via a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.37 Of the RCTs estimating the haemoglobin effect for combination deworming, one or two are pre-screened38, and all involved baseline hookworm prevalence of > 50%.39

 Taylor-Robinson et al. 2012, the Cochrane review discussing treatment of STHs, found a statistically significant 3.7 g/L increase in haemoglobin levels in two small screened trials (i.e. treating only people known to have soil-transmitted helminths).40 However, no effect on haemoglobin status was observed in the 11 (typically larger) trials that treated the entire population.41 We believe that Taylor-Robinson et al. 2012 should have included the haemoglobin results from Miguel and Kremer 2004, a large and well-known cluster-randomized unscreened trial of deworming, but that would be unlikely to change the overall picture, since it also failed to find a statistically significant increase in haemoglobin.42 Awasthi et al. 2013 reports on DEVTA, a large trial of albendazole to treat STHs in Uttar Pradesh, India.43 The trial did not find a statistically significant effect on haemoglobin levels.44 DEVTA is discussed in more detail below.We exclude results from Gulani 2007, King, Dickman, and Tisch 2005, and older Cochrane reviews on the grounds that the newer Cochrane reviews present a more exhaustive and transparent picture of the evidence.45 

From the reviews and trial included, we conclude: 

Estimated effects can vary significantly by context and by one's approach to selecting and combining studies. In particular, it appears that meta-analyses that include screened studies tend to find positive effects on haemoglobin, while meta-analyses that focus exclusively on mass (non-screened) treatment do not find statistically significant gains. (More on this pattern below.) Combination deworming appears to have an impact on the change in haemoglobin level. The best quantitative estimate we've seen of the average effect of combination deworming is +2.37 g/L, from Smith and Brooker 2010, but we would guess that that is an overestimate of the effect achieved by deworming a schoolchild in contemporary programs. The studies included in Smith and Brooker 2010 had high baseline hookworm prevalence, and at least one, possibly two, of them involved pre-screening. The relative contributions of albendazole (treating STH) and praziquantel (treating schistosomiasis) are unclear. What is the significance of a +2.37 g/L effect? Of the above reviews, Smith and Brooker 2010 is most useful for getting context on the significance of this effect, because it gives means, standard deviations, and the percentage of people found to be under various thresholds for anemia for each of the relevant studies.46 Average concentrations range from ~100-130 g/L; standard deviations from 5-15 g/L; the absolute reduction in moderate anemia (threshold is 110 g/L)47 is ~9% in one study and ~14% in another. For a point of comparison, experimental evidence on insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) implies that children sleeping under ITNs experience +5.7 g/L compared to children sleeping under no nets.48 

It is unclear whether STH-only deworming impacts haemoglobin levels, and any such effect is likely to be small. The only direct evidence of impact comes from small, screened studies, while larger unscreened studies show no statistically significant effects. (More on this pattern below.) Other impacts on general health The evidence is quite thin regarding other immediate symptoms of these infections: 

King, Dickman, and Tisch 2005 lists measures of "the impact of schistosomiasis or heavy schistosomiasis" based on treatment studies, though as discussed above, we believe these studies may actually represent the impact of combination deworming. We are unsure about the proportion of screened vs. unscreened studies in the review. The review lists statistically significant impacts on weight and skin fold thickness (64% and 66%, respectively, of a standard deviation; it isn't clear whether these refer to weight/thickness or the change in weight/thickness) and non-statistically-significant impacts on weight-for-height and height.49 The review also summarizes observational studies that examine people who are vs. aren't infected with schistosomiasis. It reports non-statistically significant differences in aerobic performance and unspecified measures of school performance and obstetric history, mixed differences (statistical significance depending on just how the comparison is made) in unspecified measures of pain history and exercise intolerance, and statistically significant effects in unspecified measures of exercise duration and diarrhea history.50 These observational studies could overstate the effects of infections (if infection is correlated with other things such as hygienic, economic or biological factors51) or understate the effects of infections (if "uninfected" people are infected after all, as King has argued elsewhere).52

 Unfortunately, this review does not allow us to link individual studies from the bibliography to the particular meta-analysis outcomes reported. We do not consider it to meet our criteria for a high-quality literature review and cannot be confident in its claims.

   Miguel and Kremer 2004 involved combination deworming, without prescreening, for some children and STH-only treatment for others (depending on the prevalence of schistosomiasis in the area).53 It found a ~25% reduction in school absenteeism, though no effect on test scores.54 It also found statistically significant impacts on self-reported sickness (both for "last week" and "often"), but not for height or weight.55 Followup studies implied potential developmental effects and externalities, discussed in later sections (along with our reservations about the study's representativeness).

 Taylor-Robinson et al. 2012, the Cochrane review discussing treatment of STH (discussed in the previous section) finds little evidence that deworming is beneficial.56 In a meta-analysis of three small studies with a total of 149 participants who were screened for STH infections prior to participation, a single deworming treatment caused a statistically significant increase in weight of about 0.6 kilograms. In meta-analyses of three or fewer small screened studies of single treatments, deworming statistically significantly improved mid-upper arm circumference and skin fold thickness, but not height or body mass index.57 Two small unscreened studies of a single dose of deworming drugs conducted in one location in Kenya with an extremely high worm burden found that deworming caused weight gain, height increase (in one of the studies), increase in mid-upper arm circumference, increase in skin fold thickness, and better performance on the Harvard Step Test of physical fitness,58 but seven more studies in different areas found no effect on weight.59 Studies with multiple doses were even more inconclusive: two found large and significant effects on weight, while ten others found small, statistically insignificant effects.60  Awasthi et al. 2013, which became available after the Cochrane review was released, reports on DEVTA, a large RCT conducted from 1999-2004 of albendazole in rural Uttar Pradesh, India.61 This study did not find a statistically significant effect on weight, height, body mass index, or self-reported illness. It did find a significant reduction in worm prevalence.62 Note that the study may have some methodological problems, which we have not considered in depth.63 What does it mean if smaller programs with screened participants show effects, while larger programs of mass deworming do not? One possibility is that STH deworming does have some impact on nutrition in infected individuals, but that the effect is too small to pick up in unscreened population studies. Another possibility is that the effects seen in smaller programs are spurious. The Cochrane review highlights the latter possibility, stating that “the data on targeted deworming is limited (three small trials, n = 149); the quality of the evidence is ’moderate’ for weight and ’low’ for haemoglobin.” (The Cochrane review also points to a third possibility: “the intervention itself is different … having been screened, and then told they have worms, children are more likely to comply with treatment, and alter their behaviour.” We find this possibility least likely, because it seems to us that children are likely to take the pills regardless of whether they know they have worms or not.)64

Bottom line on impacts on general health Overall, evidence for the impact of deworming on short-term general health is thin.

 Most of the effects discussed above are relatively small, and there is little consistency across different reviews and approaches. We would guess that combination deworming does have some subtle effects on general health, but are fairly confident that it does not have large such impacts.

  Prevention of potentially severe effects In addition to subtle general health effects, deworming may avert more severe symptoms. Schistosomiasis can cause organ damage, particularly to the bladder, liver and kidneys, sometimes resulting in death, though these deaths appear highly infrequent and we have little information about the extent of non-fatal organ damage. Severe symptoms of STH appear infrequent and short in duration.

 Schistosomiasis We have only identified one review65 (referred to here as "Van der Werf et al.") that systematically attempts to attribute severe symptoms (organ damage/malfunction, death) to schistosomiasis. This review discusses symptoms such as the presence of abnormal amounts of blood in the urine, self-reported painful urination, enlarged liver/spleen, and various signs of kidney stress or malfunction.66 However, this review is problematic for several reasons: 

We find its methodology for attributing mortality/morbidity to schistosomiasis to be highly problematic.67 It estimates 280,000 annual deaths due to schistosomiasis;68 by contrast, the official burden of disease publication released by the World Health Organization in 2008 estimates 41,000 deaths.69 Because the latter cites Van der Werf et al., (2001)70 we take this as further evidence that the methodology used in Van der Werf et al. is problematic. Nearly all of the schistosomiasis consequences discussed in Van der Werf et al. (a) can sometimes be attributable to factors other than schistosomiasis; (b) range in severity and do not necessarily have any detectable impact on quality of life.71 Outside of this review, the only quantified information we have found on severe consequences of schistosomiasis involves deaths. It appears to us that even attributing deaths to schistosomiasis is very difficult, and estimates vary widely.72 Nonetheless, we regard the World Health Organization's 2004 estimate (published in 2008) of 41,000 deaths as the most credible.73 By comparison, the same source estimates that malaria results in roughly 890,000 deaths a year, more than twenty times as many, the vast majority of which are in children under 5.74

 We can also get a sense of how bad the non-death burden of schistosomiasis is estimated to be, using the World Health Organization's disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) estimates. For each age group, we tabulated the ratio of DALYs (a measure of all manifestations of disease burden) to YLLs (comparable to DALYs but only addressing mortality).75 These figures estimate that death accounts for about 80-90% of the burden of disease in people age 15-29; 90%-94% in people age 30-44; 95%+ in people age 45+; and only 10-20% in people under 14. This picture is consistent with the idea that older people are more likely to die due to schistosomiasis, while younger people are more likely to suffer other consequences such as subtle impacts on general health and developmental effects. 

STH The serious effects of soil-transmitted helminth infections vary by species.76 Because these severe symptoms are quite rare, we have found characterizing their frequency and severity to be difficult. The most thorough and up-to-date overview that we are aware of is the chapter on intestinal nematode infections (another name for soil-transmitted helminths) in the World Health Organization's The Global Epidemiology of Infectious Disease publication. That chapter is the published version of the working paper that was used to generate the Disease Control Priorities report's cost-effectiveness estimate for soil-transmitted helminth treatment.

 For ascariasis, the most serious complication is short-term intestinal obstruction, sometimes resulting in death.77 We estimate that, each year, intestinal obstruction (which may require hospitalization and surgery and has an estimated duration of ~4 weeks) would occur in .026% of the school-age population of Sub-Saharan Africa (1 in ~3800 children per year) without treatment,78 resulting in about 3 deaths per million children per year of the school-age population.79

 For trichuriasis, heavy infections can result in a "dysenteric form" involving a bleeding/inflamed colon, discomfort and bloody stools, with a duration of 12 months or more80; this is estimated to occur about once a year per ~700 children school-aged children in Sub-Saharan Africa each year.81 It is unclear whether trichuriasis causes mortality, but if it does, this is quite rare.82

 Hookworm infection's most serious symptom is believed to be anemia.83 We discuss this symptom above and conclude that there is not strong evidence for an impact of deworming treatment on anemia; any such impact is likely to be small.

  It appears that the WHO has recently revised its estimates for STH deaths substantially downward. The World Health Organization's Global Burden of Disease report for 2001 (published in 2006) listed 1,000 deaths per year in sub-Saharan Africa for each of ascariasis and trichuriasis and 2,000 for hookworm, for a total of 4,000;84 but the Global Burden of Disease report for 2004 (published in 2008) lists a total of 412 deaths in sub-Saharan Africa (for the 3 infections combined).85

 In Awasthi et al. 2013, discussed in greater detail  above, deworming of ascaris and hookworm resulted in a 5% reduction in risk of death between ages 1-6 from 2.65% to 2.52%, though the result was not statistically significant.86 

  Developmental impacts In our view, the most compelling case for deworming as a cost-effective intervention comes not from its subtle impacts on general health (which appear relatively minor and uncertain) nor from its potential reduction in severe symptoms of disease effects (which we believe to be rare), but from the possibility that deworming children has a subtle, lasting impact on their development, and thus on their ability to be productive and successful throughout life.

 Empirical evidence on this matter is very limited, resting on two relatively well-known and well-executed studies.

  Bleakley 2007 analyzes the Rockefeller Sanitary Commission's campaign to eradicate hookworm in the American South in the early 20th century, and concludes:

 Areas with higher levels of hookworm infection prior to the RSC experienced greater increases in school enrollment, attendance, and literacy after the intervention. No significant contemporaneous results are found for literacy or occupational shifts among adults, who had negligible prior infection rates. A long-term follow-up indicates a substantial gain in income that coincided with exposure to hookworm eradication.87

 There are good reasons to be cautious in using this study as evidence relevant to deworming: 

The program studied was very different from those that apply to modern-day deworming. The campaign involved not just deworming drugs but eradication efforts on multiple fronts, including major efforts toward improved sanitation and hygiene.88 The context was very different from that of modern-day deworming: the campaign took place in the United States in the early 20th century, where the practical consequences of worm infections could have been very different from the consequences in the modern-day developing world (and the infections themselves may have been quite different as well). Bleakley 2007 is not an experimental study, but a retrospective one. That is, rather than setting out to answer a question by collecting new data, the author analyzed a large pre-existing data set, raising strong possibilities for publication bias. We believe it is unlikely that this paper would have been published in a major economics journal if it had simply concluded that there was no strong evidence for major benefits of hookworm eradication. We are generally very hesitant to use papers of this nature in our work.That said, we believe the paper merits some weight on the question of developmental benefits, because 

It has a plausible strategy for separating the effects of hookworm infection from effects of other things (such as poverty) that may correlate with hookworm infection. Specifically, it exploits the fact that the eradication campaign caused a relatively rapid drop in hookworm infection rates, that the campaign targeted hookworm specifically, and that areas with higher initial hookworm prevalence saw greater falls in hookworm prevalence.89 Thus, it seems possible that a connection between the fall in hookworm prevalence and positive life impacts — coinciding with the timing of the campaign — could be attributed specifically to hookworm eradication, and not to other factors. It uses graphs to illustrate a relationship between hookworm prevalence and later-in-life income that was negative and fairly constant from 1820-1900, then turned into "zero effect" (when adjusted using a set of controls) after 1920, coinciding well with the timing of the eradication campaign. It seems difficult to explain this pattern except by attributing the change to the drop in hookworm prevalence.90 It addresses multiple alternate possible explanations for its observations, looking relatively thoroughly for changes in "health and health policy, educational resources, race and race relations, urbanization and land use, and parental background" that might confound the results, and finds little along these lines.91 It covers a very large-scale campaign. While randomized controlled trials allow for a cleaner connection between a program and its effects, a large-scale study like this seems likely to be less dependent on idiosyncratic aspects of a particular mini-program designed to be studied.This paper hypothesizes that the fall in hookworm prevalence led to benefits primarily by improving people's ability to become literate and otherwise benefit from school.92

  Baird et al. 2011 and Baird 2007 (unpublished dissertation) are followups to Miguel and Kremer 2004, discussed in the above sections, which involved combination deworming, without prescreening, for some children and STH-only treatment for others (depending on the prevalence of schistosomiasis in the area).93 The program was not technically randomized, but used a method we consider similar to randomization to determine who was treated.94 These studies analyzed data on young adults who had been involved in the deworming program in grade school, comparing children who started receiving deworming treatment earlier to those who started receiving it later.

 Baird et al. 2011 compared the first two groups of schools to receive deworming (as treatment group) to the final group (as control); the treatment group received 2.41 extra years of deworming on average.95 The study's headline effect is that as adults, those in the treatment group worked, and earned, substantially more,96 with increased earnings driven largely by a shift into the manufacturing sector.97 The study also found a positive impact on meals consumed though not on overall consumption98 and gains on self-reported health though not on height or weight-for-height (and the treatment group had higher health expenditures).99 While the participants were still in school, the treatment had small, non-statistically significant positive effects on school performance (though not on IQ).100 Baird et al. 2012, the updated version of Baird et al. 2011, reaches substantially the same conclusions. More at our 2012 blog post and full writeup on this paper.

 Baird 2007 (unpublished dissertation) analyzes a similar, early dataset from the same program, though using a different definition of "treatment group" than the later paper: while Baird et al. 2011 uses the first two groups of schools to receive treatment as its treatment group and the last as its control, Baird 2007 (unpublished dissertation) simply looks at the number of years of deworming assigned to each child.101 It finds contrasting, though also encouraging, results: some statistically significant impacts on height and weight years after the intervention102 but no such impacts on education and labor market outcomes,103 and small negative impacts on cognitive performance.104

  There are reasons to be cautious in interpreting these studies: 

The conditions at the time of treatment are unlikely to be representative of other contexts: there was extraordinary flooding in the study area due to the El Niño climate pattern, leading to abnormally high prevalence of heavier worm infections.105 In general, we hesitate to place too much weight on a finding from a single study (or a small number of studies) because of the potential for publication bias, as well as possible alternative explanations for the findings. For example, efforts to encourage students to attend school in order to receive treatment might have bled over to later days, increasing attendance in treatment schools over the following years. The particular piece of data that led us to examine this possibility is that within schools, there is no statistically significant difference in attendance rates for treated and untreated students (the effects only appear across schools). (The authors assume that this phenomenon occurred due to the presence of within-school externalities.)In 2012, the authors behind these studies shared their data and code so that we could thoroughly examine them. Our examination resulted in an overall higher level of confidence in the studies than we had had previously, though the above concerns remain. More at our 2012 blog post and full writeup on the topic.

 Bottom line on developmental effects We find it highly plausible that deworming has subtle but significant developmental effects that improve quality of later life. The studies of the two trials we know of on this topic each have substantial limitations, and we do not consider them conclusive evidence for the presence (much less for the size) of these effects even in conditions similar to those in the trials. We do consider them suggestive evidence, enough to take the possibility of developmental effects seriously.

 We further discuss how strong we find the case for developmental effects of deworming to be, in comparison with the case for long-term effects of other interventions, in a 2012 blog post.

 Externalities for the untreated It is possible that deworming benefits people who do not receive treatment by reducing overall prevalence of worm infections in a community. The only evidence we have seen for this idea comes from the same Kenya program discussed above. Miguel and Kremer 2004 found significant impacts on children in nearby but untreated schools.106 In addition, Ozier 2011 reviewed later data on younger children, and concluded:

 Community deworming before a child’s first birthday brings about a 0.2-standard-deviation improvement in performance on Raven’s Matrices, a decade after the intervention. Estimated effects on vocabulary measures are similar in magnitude, but not always as significant; effects on memory are not statistically distinguishable from zero. A summary measure, the first principal component of all six cognitive measurements, also shows a roughly 0.2-standard-deviation effect. These effects are equivalent to between 0.5 and 0.8 additional grades in school … The effect of community deworming spillovers on height, height-for-age, and stunting all appear statistically indistinguishable from zero.107

 For reasons discussed above, we believe these studies are likely to overstate the impact of deworming, and that this overstatement is particularly likely to be an issue for externalities due to the unusual flooding and elevated level of infections. In addition, we note that the unusual design of Miguel and Kremer 2004 (in which nearby schools were assigned to be dewormed earlier or later in an essentially arbitrary way) is unlikely to be representative of large-scale school-based deworming campaigns such as those of the Schistosomiasis Control Initiative or the Deworm the World Initiative.

 That said, we think it is worth noting the possibility of externalities, as this could both (a) increase the cost-effectiveness of deworming beyond what we estimate below; (b) imply that some of the research on deworming reviewed above may understate the impact of deworming because "control" groups may have actually been positive affected by deworming.

 Possible negative/offsetting impact We have not identified many possible negative/offsetting impacts of deworming. We have considered:

 Side effects of drugs. Albendazole and praziquantel may both have side effects, including headache, abdominal pain, upset stomach, nausea, vomiting, and fever.108 These effects seem better-understood, and potentially painful but temporary, for praziquantel. There are some more serious claims for albendazole (adverse effects on growth; "reports of elevated liver enzymes, headaches, loss of hair, low levels of white blood cells (neutropenia), fever, and itching if taken at higher doses and/or for a long period of time");109 we do not have evidence on these, but note that albendazole treatment (as discussed above) seems to generally have effects that are positive or else not statistically significant. Possible development of drug resistance. The widespread use of deworming drugs may cause resistance to emerge, as has already occurred in STH of livestock.110 As far as we know, there is no strong evidence of resistance among human STHs, but we have not deeply investigated this question.111 Possible transmission of disease via deworming pills. If those administering or taking deworming pills have dirty hands, they may transmit disease while administering/taking the pill. Choking on deworming pills. Taylor-Robinson et al. 2012, the Cochrane review on STH-only deworming, notes the possibility that children might choke on deworming pills and cites the WHO's concerns about the issue.112 An article in "The Times of India" reported in 2012 that a child died in Hyperabad by choking on a deworming tablet.113Different versions of the intervention How often do people need to be treated? The World Health Organization recommends annual treatment for schistosomiasis and twice-annual treatment for soil-transmitted helminths for school-aged children in areas with prevalence above 50%.114 In areas with lower prevalence, the World Health Organization recommends less frequent deworming.115 We have not been able to fully understand the rationale for the World Health Organization's recommendations. The underlying principle is that reinfection rates are higher in areas with greater prevalence, so more frequent deworming will be necessary to avoid morbidity in those areas, but we have not found evidence that shows the superiority of annual treatment (as compared with, e.g., semi-annual or bi-annual treatment).

 The World Health Organization's recommendations about which groups of people to treat also vary with prevalence; in low-prevalence areas, treatment is restricted to school-aged children and certain categories of adults.116 We do not know how the cost-effectiveness of treating adults in high-prevalence areas compares with the cost-effectiveness of treating children.

 The main reason for focusing deworming treatment on children is that, with the exception of hookworm, the prevalence of the helminths and schistosomes is highest in childhood.117 Although deworming in childhood does not prevent adults from being reinfected with new worms, the theory underlying mass treatment is that it does prevent the developmental effects of having worms in childhood and the serious organ damage that can result from long-term high-intensity infections.118

 How cost-effective is mass deworming? As a general note on the limitations to this kind of cost-effectiveness analysis, we believe that cost-effectiveness estimates such as these should not be taken literally, due to the significant uncertainty around them. We provide these estimates (a) for comparative purposes and (b) because working on them helps us ensure that we are thinking through as many of the relevant issues as possible.

 The cost-effectiveness of deworming is very difficult to summarize, because (a) mortality and other clear, major life impacts are rare; (b) the benefits (particularly impacts on general health and developmental benefits) appear subtle and hard to quantify. 

 In addition, the cost-effectiveness of deworming may vary substantially depending on: 

Prevalence of different infections where deworming takes place. We have little information allowing us to separate the effects of different infections, though schistosomiasis appears more severe than STH. Frequency of treatment. Whether treatment is successfully delivered consistently enough to prevent reinfection. Whether treatment is provided to children or adults (the latter seem to us to be much less likely to experience later-in-life developmental benefits).We have attempted to quantify short-term health impacts using information from the Disease Control Priorities Report. Doing so has raised substantial challenges. We have found significant errors in this report's analysis that stood uncorrected in the several years between the report's publication and our 2011 investigation, and estimates of the frequency and severity of symptoms are difficult to interpret and appear to be grounded in very little in the way of empirical data. Details on how we have used this information to estimate short-term health impacts are available at our 2011 deworming report.

 We have attempted to quantify longer-term developmental impacts by working off of the effects found in the Kenya studies discussed above, and making adjustments for what we perceive as unrepresentativeness or other questions around these studies.

 We combine these in a cost-effectiveness model using inputs provided by GiveWell staff members. We estimate that deworming programs are in the same range of cost-effectiveness as our other priority programs.

 See this spreadsheet for details.

 We encourage readers who find formal cost-effectiveness analysis important to examine the details of our calculations and assumptions, and to try putting in their own. To the extent that we have intuitive preferences and biases, these could easily be creeping into the assumption- and judgment-call-laden work we’ve done in generating our cost-effectiveness figures, and we’re not entirely confident that the figures themselves are adding substantial information beyond the intuitions we have from examining the details of them.

Is there room for more funding in deworming? We believe there is substantial room to do more deworming in suitable countries. Details at our reviews of the Schistosomiasis Control Initiative and the Deworm the World Initiative.

 Our process for the 2013 update In 2013 we only conducted further research on aspects of deworming when we thought that there was a high expected return on time invested, rather than trying to answer every question we have about deworming. We looked for literature citing the major papers that we discuss above and we searched for new reviews and randomized control trials of deworming. We did not search deeply for new evidence on other questions covered in the report.119 We found Awasthi et al. 2013, a report on the DEVTA study of deworming, as well as some more information about drug resistance. We incorporated these into the report. 

 Besides this search, we also more systematically considered the evidence on STH-only deworming due to its relevance to the Deworm the World Initiative.

 We are left with the following questions that we may explore more deeply in the future:

 We believe that the causal pathway from short-term effects of deworming to long-term effects on schooling and the labor market is unknown. How likely is it that the studies that find no short-term effects of deworming are simply not measuring those short-term effects that eventually contribute to long-term outcomes? Are the effects of deworming dependent on the age of the children dewormed? How do prevalence and burden of disease affect morbidity and mortality from worms? What is the optimal amount of time between deworming treatments? What is the effect of deworming on the immune systems of people who are dewormed? On malaria? How much room for more funding for deworming is there globally? How do the effects of worm infection vary by species? Does better development in childhood tend to lead to higher earnings and other positive outcomes in adulthood? Is drug resistance a major problem in deworming? Sources Document Source Awasthi et al. 2013 Source (archive) Baird 2007 (unpublished dissertation) Unpublished Baird et al. 2011 Source (archive) Baird et al. 2012 Source Beasley et al. 1999 Source (archive) Bennett and Guyatt 2000 Source (archive) Bleakley 2007 Source (archive) Bundy et al. 2004 Source (archive) Bundy et al. Intestinal nematode infections Source Charles H King, Professor of International Health at Case Western Reserve University, email to GiveWell, November 10, 2011 Source Danso-Appiah et al. 2008 Source (archive) Duflo et al. 2012 Source (archive) GiveWell. Schistosomiasis mortality analysis Source Gulani et al. 2007 Source (archive) Hotez et al. 2006 Source (archive) King 2010 Source (archive) King and Dangerfield-Cha 2008 Source (archive) King, Dickman, and Tisch 2005 Source (archive) Lengeler 2004 Source (archive) Mathers, Ezzati, and Lopez 2007 Source (archive) Mathers, Lopez, and Murray 2006 Source (archive) Miguel and Kremer 2004 Source (archive) National Institutes of Health. Vomiting blood Source (archive) Ndibazza et al. 2012 Source (archive) Olds et al 1999 Source (archive) Ouma et al. 2005 Source (archive) Ozier 2011 Source (archive) Saconato and Atallah 2009 Source (archive) Smith and Brooker 2010 Source (archive) Sommer, West, and Martorell 2013 Source (archive) Stephenson et al. 1985a Source (archive) Stephenson et al. 1985b Source (archive) Taylor-Robinson et al. 2012 Source (archive) Taylor-Robinson, Jones, and Garner 2007 Source (archive) The Times of India 2012 Source (archive) Van der Werf and de Vlas 2001 Source Van der Werf et al. 2003 Source (archive) Vercruysse et al. 2011 Source (archive) Vercruysse, Levecke, and Prichard 2012 Source (archive) Wiria et al. 2013 Source (archive) World Health Organization. Global Burden of Disease 2004: Deaths by Age, Sex, and Cause for the year 2004 Source (archive) World Health Organization. Preventive chemotherapy in human helminthiasis Source (archive) World Health Organization. Schistosomiasis fact sheet Source (archive) World Health Organization. The global burden of disease: 2004 update Source (archive) World Health Organization. Worldwide prevalence of anaemia 1993–2005: WHO global database on anaemia Source (archive) Supplementary Sources Document Source *GiveWell. New Cochrane Review of the Effectiveness of Deworming Source *King, Charles H. 2011. Schistosomiasis: challenges and opportunities Source (archive) *Stephenson, L.S., et al. 1989. Single dose metrifonate or praziquantel treatment in Kenyan children. II. Effects on growth in relation to Schistosoma haematobium and hookworm egg counts Source (archive) *World Health Organization. Schistosomiasis strategy Source (archive) 1. "People become infected when larval forms of the parasite – released by freshwater snails – penetrate their skin during contact with infested water.... There are two major forms of schistosomiasis – intestinal and urogenital – caused by five main species of blood fluke (see table)." World Health Organization. Schistosomiasis fact sheet

 

 2. King and Dangerfield-Cha 2008, Pg 67.

 

 3. King, Dickman, and Tisch 2005, Pg 1564. 4. King and Dangerfield-Cha 2008, Pg 67. King 2010, Pg 3.

 5.  “I do think that the same effects [as with S. japonicum, the strain in the Coutinho et al. 2006 study,] obtain with S. mansoni and S. haematobium. It is possible that their effect size will be smaller than that seen with S. japonicum—there is a school of thought which suggests that anti-S. japonicum inflammation is more intense because of its higher egg output and its more recent switch to parasitism of the human host. I don’t know if this is true.” Charles H King, Professor of International Health at Case Western Reserve University, email to GiveWell, November 10, 2011.

 

 6. Saconato and Atallah 2009 Pg 2.

 

 7. Danso-Appiah et al. 2008, Pg 2.

 

 8. "Each worm’s establishment in a host is the result of a separate infection event, and the number of infective stages shed (the infectiousness of the host) is a function of the number of worms present. In population dynamic terms this implies that the individual worm is the unit of transmission for helminths, while the individual host is the unit for microparasites (Anderson & May 1982)... Since the size of the worm burden varies considerably between individuals, and infection implies only that worms are present, a population of "infected" people will exhibit considerable variation in the severity of disease manifestations." Bundy et al. 2004, Pgs 245-46.

 

 9. “The age-dependent patterns of infection prevalence are generally similar among the major helminth species, exhibiting a rise in childhood to a relatively stable asymptote in adulthood (figure 24.1). Maximum prevalence of A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura is usually attained before five years of age, and the maximum prevalence of hookworm and schistosome infections is usually attained in adolescence or in early adulthood. The nonlinear relationship between prevalence and intensity has the consequence that the observed age-prevalence profiles provide little indication of the underlying profiles of age intensity (age in relation to worm burden). Because intensity is linked to morbidity, the age-intensity profiles provide a clearer understanding of which populations are vulnerable to the different helminths (figure 24.1). For A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura infections, the age-intensity profiles are typically convex in form, with the highest intensities in children 5 to 15 years of age (Bundy 1995). For schistosomiasis, a convex pattern is also observed, with a similar peak but with a plateau in adolescents and young adults 15 to 29 years of age (Kabatereine and others 1999). In contrast, the age-intensity profile for hookworm exhibits considerable variation, although intensity typically increases with age until adulthood and then plateaus (Brooker, Bethony, and Hotez 2004). In East Asia it is also common to find the highest intensities among the elderly. However, more generally, children and young adults are at higher risk of both harboring higher levels of infection (thus greater levels of morbidity) and becoming reinfected more quickly. Both may occur at vital stages in a child’s intellectual and physical development.” Hotez et al. 2006, Pgs 469-470.

 

 10. “The eggs of S. haematobium have a terminal spine and must traverse the bladder tissues towards the lumen of the bladder and urinary tract for elimination via urine. In the process, a considerable number become trapped in the bladder walls and surrounding tissues to initiate immune- induced inflammatory reactions, which subsequently lead to morbidity. It is important to note that eggs trapped in the tissues cause disease rather than the worms themselves.” Danso-Appiah et al. 2008, Pg 3.

 

 11. "Haematuria (blood in urine) and dysuria (painful urination) are the main early symptoms of the disease." Danso-Appiah et al. 2008, Pg 3.  “At the time of our follow-up examinations, prevalence of hematuria was 40% among the previously treated group and 39% among un- treated subjects (P = not significant). Moderate-to-severe hematuria (visible hematuria = 2+ or 3+ by dipstick) was more common among untreated subjects (prevalence = 24%) than among those previously treated (prevalence = 14%), and this difference had borderline statistical significance (McNemar’s S = 3.6, P = 0.058).” Ouma et al. 2005, Pg 361. 

 12. "Sustained heavy infection leads to iron deficiency anaemia and other nutritional deficiencies, especially in children (Awasthi 2003; [King, Dickman, and Tisch 2005]. The disease often results in retarded growth, reduced physical activity, and impaired cognitive function in children (Stephenson 1993; Nokes 1999; PCD 1999; Jukes 2002; WHO 2002)." Danso-Appiah et al. 2008, Pg 3.

 

 13. "Late-stage complications are insidious and include calcification of the bladder wall, bladder stones, and secondary bacterial infection (Jordan 1993). Tissue damage caused by trapped eggs can lead to diffuse or localized wall thickening of the bladder and the distal ureter hydronephrosis orhydroureter, which may eventually lead to kidney failure (Kardorff 2001; WHO 2002; Van der Werf et al. 2003). Elevated urine albumin levels and reported pain upon micturition by children have a strong correlation with S. haematobium infection (Rollinson 2005). An important long-term consequence of infection is squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder (Jordan 1993; King 2005; Shiff 2006). A recent review points out that bladder carcinoma is the seventh most common cancer worldwide in men and that the highest incidence rate among men is found in Egypt (37.1 per 100,000 person-years) (Murta-Nascimento 2007), which might be related to S. haematobium infection and morbidity (Jordan 2000)." Danso-Appiah et al. 2008, Pg 3.

 

 14. "Schistosomiasis infects the intestine, liver, and spleen. It can cause bloody diarrhoea, bloody stools, and abdominal pain (Gryseels 1992; WHO 1993). Infection of the liver and spleen causes liver fibrosis and portal hypertension that are generally irreversible in the late stages and kill patients, sometimes as a result of haemorrhage from varices (WHO 1993). Liver failure may also occur, especially when S. mansoni infection is associated with viral hepatitis (Pereira 1994)." Saconato and Atallah 2009, Pg 2.

 

 15. There is substantial disagreement about the number of annual fatalities due to schistosomiasis-caused non-functioning kidneys and hematemesis (estimates range from under 27,000 to 280,000).

 "WHO (2002) estimates that 27,000 people die annually from STH infections and schistosomiasis (case fatality rate of 0.0014 percent). Many investigators, however, believe that this figure is an underestimate. Crompton (1999) estimated that 155,000 deaths annually occur from these infections (case fatality rate of 0.08 percent), whereas Van der Werf et al. (2003), using the limited data available from Africa, estimated the schistosomiasis mortality alone at 280,000 per year (case fatality rate of 0.014 percent) because of nonfunctioning kidneys (from S. haematobium) and hematemesis (from S. mansoni). Therefore, the difference between estimates for helminth-associated mortality is more than 10-fold." Hotez et al. 2006, Pg 470.

 

 16. “Schistosomiasis is, in its very essence, a chronic inflammatory disease. This is because parasite eggs must pass through host tissues from the circulation to the lumen of bowel or bladder in order to leave the human body. However, this is an inefficient process — during the course of infection, over half of the eggs produced by female schistosomes never leave the human body and remain trapped in host tissues. There, the eggs induce a granulomatous response that progresses to focal areas of fibrosis within the affected organ. Over many years, the cumulative impact of tissue damage can lead to organ failure and consequent severe clinical morbidity and mortality. Early in infection, some of the tissue damage is reversible, but as fibrosis progresses, the cumulative damage caused by infection becomes irreversible. Even when infection is over, which may occur as adults reach their 30s and 40s, irreversible parasite-mediated organ damage may continue to affect patient health status.” King and Dangerfield-Cha 2008, Pg 67.

 

 17. Mathers, Ezzati, and Lopez 2007, Pg 8.

 

 18. "A. lumbricoides is the large roundworm (15 cm) and lies free in the human duodenum where it feeds on lumenal contents (see Crompton, Nesheim & Pawlowski (1989) for further details of the biology of this parasite). Like all the other nematodes considered here, the worms are dioecious, which is to say that they exist as male and female. The female produces some 100 000 eggs per day which pass out in the faeces of the host and embryonate externally at a rate determined by local environmental factors. The eggs hatch on ingestion, releasing a larva that undergoes a tissue migration involving the cardiovascular and pulmonary systems. The larva moults as it migrates and ultimately is coughed up from the lungs, swallowed, and becomes established as the adult in the small intestine. The cycle from egg deposition to female patency, when the female is able to produce eggs, has a duration of some 50 days.

 T. trichiura, the human whipworm, is a much smaller worm (25 mm) and inhabits the colon (Bundy & Cooper 1989). The anterior two-thirds of the worm is thin and thread-like and is laced through the mucosal epithelium, upon which the worm is believed to feed, leaving the blunt posterior projecting into the colonic lumen for excretion and oviposition. The female produces some 2000 eggs per day which pass out in the host faeces and embryonate externally. The infectious eggs hatch on ingestion and undergo a specifically local migration, via the crypts of Lieberkühn to the mucosal surface. The development cycle takes some 60 days.

 The two major hookworm species, which are of similar magnitude to the whipworm, inhabit the small intestine, where they attach to villi with biting mouthparts (Schad & Warren 1990). The worms feed on host blood and move frequently to new sites, leaving multiple, bleeding petechial haemorrhages on the mucosal surface." Bundy et al. 2004, Pgs 244-45.

 19. "Each worm’s establishment in a host is the result of a separate infection event, and the number of infective stages shed (the infectiousness of the host) is a function of the number of worms present. In population dynamic terms this implies that the individual worm is the unit of transmission for helminths, while the individual host is the unit for microparasites (Anderson & May 1982)... Since the size of the worm burden varies considerably between individuals, and infection implies only that worms are present, a population of "infected" people will exhibit considerable variation in the severity of disease manifestations." Bundy et al. 2004, Pgs 245-46.

 

 20. "The size of the worm burden (the intensity of infection) is therefore a central determinant of helminth transmission dynamics, and is also the major determinant of morbidity since the pathology is related to the size of the worm burden, usually in a non-linear fashion (Stephenson 1987, Cooper & Bundy 1987, 1988). Since the size of the worm burden varies considerably between individuals, and infection implies only that worms are present, a population of “infected” people will exhibit considerable variation in the severity of disease manifestations. The intuitive assumption that all infections are equal may help to explain the historical confusion over the pathogenicity and public health significance of helminth infection (Bundy 1988, Cooper and Bundy 1989). From these considerations it is apparent that an understanding of helminth epidemiology centres around an understanding of the patterns of infection intensity." Bundy et al. 2004, Pgs 245-46.

 

 21. Gulani et al. 2007.

 

 22. "There is a general acceptance of the simple view that very intense infection results in illness, a view that reflects both clinical experience of overwhelming infection and, perhaps equally importantly, an atavistic repugnance at the insidious invasion of the body by large numbers of worms. Such extremes of infection result in the severe anaemia of necatoriasis and the intestinal obstruction of ascariasis (Stephenson 1987), and the chronic colitis of classical trichuris dysentery syndrome (Cooper & Bundy 1988)." Bundy et al. 2004, Pg 248.

 

 23. "There is a general acceptance of the simple view that very intense infection results in illness, a view that reflects both clinical experience of overwhelming infection and, perhaps equally importantly, an atavistic repugnance at the insidious invasion of the body by large numbers of worms. Such extremes of infection result in the severe anaemia of necatoriasis and the intestinal obstruction of ascariasis (Stephenson 1987), and the chronic colitis of classical trichuris dysentery syndrome (Cooper & Bundy 1988)." Bundy et al. 2004, Pg 248.

 

 24. "Ascariasis is the best documented helminthiasis in terms of mortality. There are numerous studies of case fatality rates in hospitals (reviewed by Pawlowski & Davies 1989). These indicate that the outcome of acute complications of ascariasis is modified by the general health status of the patient, the intensity of infection and the medical procedure (see Pawlowski & Davies 1989). In one hospital in Sao Paulo, for example, the case fatality rate was 1.35 per cent for conditions which could be managed conservatively, and 26.1 per cent in patients undergoing surgery (Okumura et al. 1974). These studies confirm that death is a not infrequent outcome of complications of ascariasis, but provide little insight into mortality rates in the community. An extrapolation from central hospital data in Myanmar suggests there are 0.008 deaths per 1000 infections per year (Thein-Hliang 1987), but this is considered to be a considerable underestimate since only a small proportion of children with severe complications are likely to have access to the hospital (Pawlowski & Davies 1989). Only two population based estimates are available: one for the Darmstadt epidemic (0.1 deaths per 1000 infected per year) (Krey 1949) and one for Japan prior to national control efforts (0.061 deaths per 1000 infected per year) (Yokogawa 1976). Based on the present estimate of global infection, these rates suggest that between 8 000 and 14 000 children die each year.

 The final estimate of global mortality due to ascariasis in the Global Burden of Disease project was 11,000 concentrated in the age group 5–14 years (Murray and Lopez 1996). Mortality was distributed by region in proportion to the region-specific population at risk (above higher threshold) and to the region-specific probability of dying between birth and 4 years (World Bank 1993). This last quantity was added to take account of regional variations in access to acute medical services.

 No population-based mortality estimates have been published for T. trichiura infection. Prior to the advent of safe and effective therapy for T. trichiura infection in the late 1970s a number of reports described paediatric inpatients with Trichuris Dysentery Syndrome who, despite clinical efforts, died as a result of profuse haemorrhage and secondary anaemia (Wong and Tan 1961, Fisher and Cremin 1970) or of intussusception (Reeder, Astacio & Theros 1968). Although there continue to be reports of the syndrome, a fatal outcome in a clinical setting today would suggest inappropriate management. The picture in the community, however, may be rather different since, in the absence of specific diagnosis, the aetiology of chronic bloody dysentery may be unrecognized. Nevertheless, mortality is undoubtedly a rare consequence of trichuriasis.

 The profound anaemia of hookworm infection is life-threatening and has been estimated, although the means of estimation are not described, to result in 65 000 deaths per year (World Health Organization 1992). Again there is a lack of empirical data, presumably in this case because of the difficulty in identifying the etiology of anaemia-related deaths. A figure of 4 300 deaths was used by Murray and Lopez (1996) and was distributed to ascribe the highest proportion of mortality to women of childbearing age (15–44 years) and to older age groups. The distribution of deaths between regions was divided in the same way as for the other infections.

 In including these estimates of mortality we recognize that they are unsupported by vital registration statistics. But it should also be recognized that intense infection is most prevalent in the poorest regions of the poorest countries. In such areas mortality may be most likely because of limited access to appropriate management, while both the diagnosis of cause of death and its registration may be least reliable. There is clear evidence that deaths do occur. What is unclear is the extent of this mortality." Bundy et al. 2004, Pgs 281-82.

 

 25. World Health Organization. Preventive chemotherapy in human helminthiasis, Pg 10. 

 

 26. World Health Organization. Preventive chemotherapy in human helminthiasis, Pg 10.

 

 27. "Schools offer a readily available, extensive, and sustained infrastructure with a skilled workforce that is in close contact with the community. With support from the local health system, teachers can deliver the drugs safely. Teachers need only a few hours of training to understand the rationale for deworming and to learn how to give out the pills and keep a record of their distribution." Hotez et al. 2006, Pg 473.

 

 28. Danso-Appiah et al. 2008. Saconato and Atallah 2009. 

 29. “The CRs [cure rates] and ERRs [egg reduction rates] for the recommended doses of albendazole and mebendazole in treating A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura and hookworm are shown in Fig. 1. For A. lumbricoides, all drug regimens are highly effective, with median CRs of 95–97% and median ERRs of 99–100%. More importantly, there is little variation in the drug efficacies between the individual studies for any given drug regimen. In contrast, the patterns for T. trichiura and hookworm are more variable. For both of these parasites, there is marked heterogeneity both in the drug efficacy between drug regimens and the drug efficacy between individual studies administering a given regimen. This is particularly evident for T. trichiura, for which both single-dose albendazole and mebendazole show poor levels of drug efficacy, particularly in terms of CR. For example, the median CR for a single dose of 400 mg albendazole is only 38%, with individual studies reporting CRs ranging from 4.9% to 99.3%.” Bennett and Guyatt 2000, Pg 72.

 

 30. World Health Organization. Worldwide prevalence of anaemia 1993–2005: WHO global database on anaemia. See Table 2 (page 4) for haemoglobin thresholds by age.

 

 31. Danso-Appiah et al. 2008, Analysis 5.2 (Pg 60).

 

 32. Danso-Appiah et al. 2008, Analysis 2.2 (Pg 58).

 

 33. Danso-Appiah et al. 2008 Analysis 1.2 (Pg 57).

 

 34. "Metrifonate is partially effective against hookworm infection (Kurz et al. 1986), and therefore, inclusion of studies using metrifonate would potentially overestimate the impact of praziquantel treatment." Smith and Brooker 2010, Pg 791.

 

 35. "Children were invited to participate in the study if they were infected with both S. haematobium and at least one species of geohelminth." Beasley et al. 1999, Pg 745. "Daily urinary iron loss and physical fitness were determined in Kenyan primary school children who had low-medium (16-177 eggs/10 ml adj) or high (200-1,194 eggs/10 ml adj) S. hematobium egg counts compared with a matched group of control or uninfected children before and after antischistosomal treatment with metrifonate. The 3 groups did not differ significantly before treatment in age, sex ratio, anthropometry or prevalence of other parasite infections. Before treatment, mean iron loss in the high egg count group (n = 14) was 652 micrograms/24 hr and was significantly higher than losses in the low-medium and control groups (losses = 278, 149 micrograms; n = 19, 12 respectively). Iron loss in infected children was correlated with egg count (r = 0.40) and log of egg count (r = 0.56, P less than 0.0003). After treatment iron loss decreased in the infected groups and post-treatment iron losses did not differ significantly. Physical fitness scores, measured with the Harvard Step Test, showed that the control group (score 81) was significantly more fit than the high egg count group (score 69) before treatment. Fitness scores improved significantly in both infected groups after treatment, and post-treatment fitness scores did not differ significantly between the 3 groups. This study provides evidence that relatively heavy infections of S. hematobium can cause urinary iron loss which, if it persists, is great enough to produce iron deficiency anemia and can also reduce physical fitness of children, but that both of these negative effects are reversible with treatment." Stephenson et al. 1985a, abstract. "Relationships of S. haematobium, hookworm and malarial infections to growth 6 months after metrifonate treatment were studied in Kenyan primary school children in an area where poor growth, S. haematobium and hookworm were common and malaria was endemic. All children with light-moderate S. haematobium infections (1-500 eggs/10 ml adj) in 4 schools were examined (Exam 1), allocated at random to either placebo (MIP, n = 198) or metrifonate treatment (MIT, n = 201) groups, treated, and examined again 6 months later (Exam 2). An additional 19 heavily infected children (HIT group greater than 500 eggs/10 ml adj) were treated immediately after Exam 1 and also followed. The MIT and HIT groups exhibited more rapid growth between Exam 1 and 2 than did the placebo group. The MIT group gained significantly (P less than 0.001) more than the MIP group in weight (0.8 kg), percent weight for age (2.3 percentage points), weight for height squared (0.04 units), arm circumference (0.4 cm), percent arm circumference for age (1.7 percentage points) and in triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses. In addition, the placebo group showed statistically significant decreases between exams in percentage weight for age, percent arm circumference for age, both skinfold thicknesses for age and no significant increase in percent height for age while the MIT group exhibited highly significant increases in all anthropometric parameters …"Stephenson et al. 1985b, abstract. "We studied the growth of comparable groups of children with light to moderate Schistosoma haematobium infections who received a single dose of metrifonate (MT, 10 mg/kg), praziquantel (PR, 40 mg/kg), or a placebo (PL). Children were re-examined 8 months later. The MT and PR groups gained significantly more than the placebo group in weight, percent weight for age, percent weight for height, arm circumference, and in triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses. The MT and PR groups did not differ significantly from each other. The placebo group showed statistically significant decreases or no change between exams in percent weight for age, percent weight for height, percent arm circumference, and both skinfold thicknesses; the MT and PR groups exhibited highly significant increases in these parameters (P less than 0.0002). The intensity of S. haematobium infection had decreased significantly in both the MT and PR groups, but especially in the PR group. Multiple regression analyses showed that a decrease in the intensity of S. haematobium infection was by far the most important predictor of growth rate after treatment for all 5 anthropometric measures tested; decreases in the intensity of hookworm infection was also significant for 2 of the 5 measures." Stephenson et al. 1985b, abstract. 

 36. "In 2007, a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the impact of anthelmintic treatment reported an increase in haemoglobin concentration (Hb) of 1.71 g ⁄ l after treatment (Gulani et al. 2007). But this review did not distinguish between different helminth species or account for intensity of infection, which may have underestimated the true treatment effect (Awasthi & Bundy 2007); the effect of treatment is likely to be greatest where hookworm is most prevalent and intense … The present work aims to quantify the impact of hookworm infection and anthelmintic treatment using benzimidazoles, albendazole and mebendazole, among non-pregnant populations in hookworm-endemic areas. Specifically, we review available data from cross-sectional studies that investigated the relationship between intensity of hookworm infection and Hb. We also summarise available data from RCTs and pre- and post-intervention observational studies that compared the effects of benzimidazole treatment, either alone or in combination with the anti-schistosomal drug praziquantel, on Hb and anaemia levels. Finally, based on the value of combining deworming with micronutrient supplementation in children, we evaluate the impact of treatment in combination with iron supplementation (Hall 2007)." Smith and Brooker 2010, Pg 777.

 

 37. "There was a positive impact of 2.37 g ⁄ l (95%CI: 1.33–3.50) on mean Hb when albendazole was co-administered with praziquantel, but no apparent additional benefit of treatment with benzimidazoles combined with iron supplementation. " Smith and Brooker 2010, abstract.

 

 38. Smith and Brooker 2010. Table 2, pg 784. 

"Children were invited to participate in the study if they were infected with both S. haematobium and at least one species of geohelminth." Beasley et al. 1999, Pg 745. “Multi-helminth chemotherapy was given to children found infected with any of the common geohelminths or S. mansoni with albendazole and praziquantel, respectively.” Friis et al. 2003, Pg 574. Despite this quotation, it is not clear whether or not Friis et al involved pre-screening; the combined prevalence of the three STHs and schistosomiasis was nearly 200%: “The prevalence of malaria parasitaemia was 59%, whereas it was 14% for A. lumbri- coides, 45% for T. trichiura, 55% for hookworm and 71% for S. mansoni.” Friis et al. 2003, Pg 575. 

 39. Hookworm prevalence from Table 2, pg. 784 for studies included in the albendazole with praziquantel analysis in Figure 3, pg. 790. All trials were in sub-Saharan Africa. Table 2, pg. 784.  There were a total number of 408 people in the treatment groups across the studies. 127+34+187+60 = 408. Table 2, pg. 784. 

 40. “[Only infected children included, Single dose (comparison 1):] For haemoglobin, the mean value was slightly higher at the end of the study with deworming (mean difference 0.37 g/dL, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.64; 108 participants, two trials; Analysis 1.7).” Taylor-Robinson et al. 2012, Pg 19.

 

 41. Taylor-Robinson et al. 2012. Pgs 19-20: 

"[Whole population treated, Single dose (comparison 3):] For haemoglobin, two studies were in moderate prevalence areas, and one in low prevalence areas. No effect was demonstrable in individual studies or on meta analysis (mean difference 0.06 g/ dL, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.17; 1005 participants, three trials; Analysis 3.6)." “[Whole population treated, Multiple doses, less than a year of follow up (comparison 4):] For haemoglobin, four trials reported this, with no difference between intervention and control apparent (Analysis 4.6).” “[Whole population treated, Multiple doses, follow up of one year or more (comparison 5):] For haemoglobin, deworming drugs did not increase haemoglobin compared with control (mean difference 0.00 g/dL, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.08; 1365 participants, two trials; Analysis 5.3)." Examining the three separate analyses leads us to believe that combining the underlying studies together into a single meta-analysis would not lead to a statistically significant effect, but we have not carried out such a calculation.

 

 42.  “Although Group 1 pupils had higher hemoglobin concentrations than Group 2 pupils in early 1999, the difference is not statistically different than zero. Recall that anemia is the most frequently hypothesized link between worm infections and cognitive performance (Stoltzfus et al. (1997)). Severe anemia is relatively rare in Busia: fewer then 4 percent of pupils in Group 2 schools (comparison schools in 1998) fell below the Kenya Ministry of Health anemia threshold of 100 g/L in early 1999 before deworming treatment. This is low relative to many other areas in Africa, of which many have substantial helminth problems: a recent survey of studies of anemia among school children in less developed countries (Hall and Partnership for Child Development (2000)) indicates that there is considerably less anemia in Busia than in samples from Ghana, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique, and Tanzania.” Miguel and Kremer 2004, Pg 174. Taylor-Robinson et al. 2012 exclude Miguel and Kremer 2004's haemoglobin results because the method of selection for the subpopulation was not described: “For haemoglobin, weight and height the outcomes appear to have been measured on a sub-sample of the quasi-randomized population. For haemoglobin this was approximately 4% (778/20,000) - it is unclear how these were selected.” Pg 69. “Miguel 2004 (Cluster) demonstrated no significant effect on weight-for-age z score, height-for-age z score, and haemoglobin (only 4% of quasi-randomized participants followed up for haemoglobin outcome; the proportion followed up for nutritional outcomes is unclear).” Pg 20. However, further exposition from the authors has specified that haemoglobin data was collected from a random subsample of trial participants: “The reason for the smaller Hb sample is that it was only collected for a random subsample, information that is readily available from the authors.” Duflo et al. 2012. 



 43. "We therefore planned a large cluster-randomised trial of whether the ICDS could inexpensively and sustainably deliver anthelmintics at operational scale to rural pre-school children in Uttar Pradesh. The primary aim of the trial was to assess effects of a widely practicable periodic deworming regimen on mortality at ages 1·0–6·0 years. Plans for this deworming trial were eventually revised into plans for a factorial trial of albendazole, vitamin A (retinol), both, or neither that would assess the effects of each agent on child mortality. This report focuses on the albendazole results; an accompanying report gives the vitamin A results." Pg. 1478.

 

 44. Among the 5,165 participants for whom haemoglobin data was collected, the effect size was 0.2 g/L (95% CI: -1.2 — 1.5 g/L). Pg. 1481, Table 1.

 

 45. We have particular worries about Gulani et al. 2007 and King, Dickman, and Tisch 2005: 

Gulani 2007. This review implies that the reviewed studies were unscreened (treating the population as a whole), saying, "The results from these largely heterogeneous data derived from randomised controlled trials show that deworming without previous screening marginally improves haemoglobin concentration." However, this is the only statement that appears in the review regarding pre-screening, and at least one of the studies in the review did in fact involve pre-screening. "A single dose had no statistically significant effect on haemoglobin levels (646 children, 4 trials, Analysis 2.7). Removing the one trial that screened children for infection, Adams 1994, did not alter this result (Analysis 8.2: subgroup 8)." Taylor-Robinson, Jones, and Garner 2007, Pg 21. Accordingly, we prefer to rely on the Taylor-Robinson et al. 2012 Cochrane review of STH treatment, which distinguishes clearly between screened and unscreened studies. King, Dickman, and Tisch 2005. The meta-analysis of five studies of the effect of schistosomiasis treatment haemoglobin status is less helpful for us than the Danso-Appiah et al. 2008 Cochrane review of schistosomiasis treatment because: One of the studies—with the largest effect—is of S. japonicum, which we exclude from this analysis. Three of the studies (the first three listed) are all present in Danso-Appiah et al. 2008, discussed above in this section; all involved pre-screened treatment, and at least two (if not three - the reference is ambiguous) involve combination deworming, not treatment for schistosomiasis specifically. The fifth study also involves S. japonicum and combination deworming, not treatment for schistosomiasis specifically: "A double-blind placebo-controlled study of the concurrent administration of albendazole and praziquantel was conducted in>1500 children with high prevalences of geohelminths and schistosomiasis. The study sites were in China and the Philippines, including 2 strains of Schistosoma japonicum, and 2 different regions of Kenya, 1 each with endemic Schistosoma mansoni or Schistosoma haematobium." Olds et al 1999, abstract. The study found statistically significant benefits on haemoglobin levels in the schistosomiasis treatment arms but not in the STH arms. It is not obvious to us why Olds et al. 1999's schistosomiasis haemoglobin results are excluded from the Danso-Appiah et al. 2008 Cochrane review. 

 46. See Smith and Brooker 2010, Table 2 (Pgs 784-785). 

 

 47. Mathers, Lopez, and Murray 2006, Pg 113.

 

 48. "Anaemia: expressed in mean packed cell volume (PCV); it is equivalent to the percentage haematocrit. Results given in g/decilitre were converted with a standard factor of 3:1, that is, 1 g/decilitre equals 3%PCV." Lengeler 2004, Pg 4. " The nine trials that measured anaemia were conducted in areas of stable malaria; six trials compared treated to untreated nets (Appendix 13), and three trials compared treated nets to untreated nets (Appendix 14). Overall, the packed cell volume of children in the ITN group was higher by 1.7 absolute packed cell volume per cent compared to children not using nets. When the control group used untreated nets, the difference was 0.4 absolute packed cell volume per cent." Lengeler 2004, Pg 4.

 0.4 packed cell volume converts to (0.4/3 * 10) = 1.3 g/L using the conversion factor provided (and multiplying by 10 to convert from g/dL to g/L). Similarly, 1.7 packed cell volume converts to (1.7 / 3 * 10) = 5.7 g/L.

 49. King, Dickman, and Tisch 2005, Table 1, Pg 1565.

 

 50. King, Dickman, and Tisch 2005, Table 1 and Table 2, Pg 1565.

 

 51. "The use of observational studies and the inclusion of select subpopulation surveys (eg, school-age children) allows possible confounding effects on the observed results, thus obscuring the assessment of attributable risk due to schistosomiasis. Schistosomiasis is inevitably associated with other potential causes for morbidity and disease, especially with restricted access to safe water supplies and with co-infection by other parasites. Several studies have reported that age, sex, socioeconomic status, and diet can significantly modify the risk for schistosomiasis-associated morbidity. In nine of ten individual surveys that adjusted for some or all of these cofactors, the effect of schistosomiasis on measured disability outcomes has remained significant. However, details of these potentially modifying factors were not available in most of the studies included in our analysis, and so adjustment was not attempted in the estimation of our summary statistics." King, Dickman, and Tisch 2005, Pg 1566-1567.

 

 52. “Many of our `gold-standard' field diagnostic tests are too insensitive for such research. That is, the standard tests routinely misdiagnose as `uninfected' those individuals who actually carry light infections (Wilson et al., 2006). In the case of schistosomiasis, the Kato-Katz stool test used to detect and quantify intensity of intestinal schistosome infections is only 40% – 60% sensitive when performed on a single stool specimen (de Vlas et al., 1993, Carabin et al., 2005). While this microscopic exam may variously detect eggs of hookworm, Ascaris, Trichuris, and other intestinal worms, it is not particularly sensitive for detection of hookworm, and will often miss the other STH species if their infection intensities happen to be light. As a result, this standard field screening approach will significantly misclassify (by underdiagnosis) the clinical burden of single and mixed parasite infection. Inadequate testing for Schistosoma or STH results in misclassification bias that substantially reduces our power to detect numerically small, but clinically relevant infection-related differences in health outcomes, including anaemia (reductions in haemoglobin level), or stunting and chronic undernutrition (age-related height and weight deficits). Misdiagnosis, when combined with co-morbid conditions that are competing causes of disease (e.g., hookworm or malaria), effectively limits our appreciation of both the individual and the combined health impacts of common human parasitic infections.” King 2010, Pg 2.

 

 53. "Following World Health Organization recommendations (WHO (1992)), schools with geohelminth prevalence over 50 percent were mass treated with albendazole every six months, and schools with schistosomiasis prevalence over 30 percent were mass treated with praziquantel annually. All treatment schools met the geohelminth cut-off in both 1998 and 1999. Six of twenty-five treatment schools met the schistosomiasis cut-off in 1998 and sixteen of fifty treatment schools met the cut-off in 1999." Miguel and Kremer 2004, Pgs 168-169. 

 

 54. "Intestinal helminths—including hookworm, roundworm, whipworm, and schistosomiasis—infect more than one-quarter of the world’s population. Studies in which medical treatment is randomized at the individual level potentially doubly underestimate the benefits of treatment, missing externality benefits to the comparison group from reduced disease transmission, and therefore also underestimating benefits for the treatment group. We evaluate a Kenyan project in which school-based mass treatment with deworming drugs was randomly phased into schools, rather than to individuals, allowing estimation of overall program effects. The program reduced school absenteeism in treatment schools by one-quarter, and was far cheaper than alternative ways of boosting school participation. Deworming substantially improved health and school participation among untreated children in both treatment schools and neighboring schools, and these externalities are large enough to justify fully subsidizing treatment. Yet we do not find evidence that deworming improved academic test scores." Miguel and Kremer 2004, abstract.

 

 55. Miguel and Kremer 2004, Table V, Pg 173.

 

 56. See our 2012 blog post on this review. Taylor-Robinson et al. 2012

 

 57. "For nutritional measures, trials measured weight (n = 3), height (n = 2), MUAC (n = 3), triceps (n = 2), subscapular (n = 1) skinfold and BMI (n = 1). The trials demonstrated weight gain (0.58 kg, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.76; 149 participants, three trials; Analysis 1.1); and gains in MUAC, triceps and subscapular skinfold values (Analysis 1.3; Analysis 1.4; Analysis 1.5). No difference in height or body mass index was detected after a single dose (Analysis 1.2; Analysis 1.6)." Taylor-Robinson et al. 2012, Pg 19.

 

 58. Sample size: Stephenson 1989: 150 total participants, pg. 80. Stephenson 1993; 284 total participants, pg. 81. Prevalence: "...the two Stephenson trials assessing single-dose deworming in the same high prevalence school (Stephenson 1989; Stephenson 1993), where more than 90% of the children were infected with both hookworm and Trichuris, with heavy worm loads..." pg. 23. Analysis 3.1, pg. 102; Analysis 3.3, pg. 104; Analysis 3.4, pg. 105; Analysis 3.5, pg. 106; Analysis 3.7, pg. 108. 

 59. Analysis 3.1, pg. 102.

 

 60. Analysis 4.1, pg. 109; Analysis 5.1, pg. 116.

 Taylor-Robinson et al. 2012 find essentially no evidence from studies of mass STH deworming to show that it improves height, cognitive test scores, or school attendance 

 Taylor-Robinson et al. 2012, Pg 4-5.

 

 61. "We therefore planned a large cluster-randomised trial of whether the ICDS could inexpensively and sustainably deliver anthelmintics at operational scale to rural pre-school children in Uttar Pradesh. The primary aim of the trial was to assess effects of a widely practicable periodic deworming regimen on mortality at ages 1·0–6·0 years. Plans for this deworming trial were eventually revised into plans for a factorial trial of albendazole, vitamin A (retinol), both, or neither that would assess the effects of each agent on child mortality. This report focuses on the albendazole results; an accompanying report gives the vitamin A results." Pg. 1478. Location: "This cluster-randomised study spanned seven adjacent districts (area 35000 km2, 3 degrees of latitude by 1 of longitude; figure1). Excluding major municipalities, they consist of 118 largely rural administrative blocks (units that generally have a rural population of more than 100,000). 72 of these blocks could participate; 36 were cluster- randomly allocated albendazole every 6 months for 5 years and 36 open control (figure 2). The study was based in Lucknow, the Uttar Pradesh state capital." Pgs. 1478-9. Timing: Figure 2, pg. 1480. Prevalence: Awasthi et al. 2013, Table 1, pg. 1481. Prevalence of ascaris in control blocks was 28.1%, of hookworm 8.9%, and of tapeworm 5.7%. 

 62. Table 1, Pg. 1481. Reductions in prevalence: Ascaris; 28.1% prevalence in control vs. 12.9% in the treatment group (95% CI of reduction: 13.4% -- 17.0%). Hookworm; 8.9% prevalence in control vs. 3.8% in the treatment group (95% CI of reduction: 3.9% -- 6.3%). Either Ascaris or hookworm; 35.6% prevalence in control vs. 16.4% in the treatment group (95% CI of reduction: 17.2% -- 21.1%). No significant reduction for tapeworm.

 

 63. Specific to the deworming intervention, children with "obvious worms" were treated, even in the control group: "AWC workers in albendazole and control blocks held non-study mebendazole to treat children with obvious worms; otherwise, there was little non-study anthelmintic treatment." Pg. 1482. The report does not specify what is meant by "obvious worms." Although this additional treatment may have reduced the effects found in the study, it may also be a more realistic representation of how a large-scale deworming program would actually be implemented. More generally, Vitamin A supplementation experts have called DEVTA's methodology into question: see for example Sommer, West, and Martorell 2013. 

 64. Taylor-Robinson et al. 2012, Pg 23.

 

 65. We primarily refer here to Van der Werf and de Vlas 2001, the working paper version (with more detail) than Van der Werf et al. 2003.

 

 66. Van der Werf and de Vlas 2001, Pgs 3-5.

 

 67. Van der Werf and de Vlas 2001, Pgs 13-15 discusses the method of generating estimates of the relationship between schistosomiasis prevalence and the prevalence of the various sequelae discussed. Charts throughout the remainder of the review show the curve that is fitted to the data points provided by the studies reviewed. We find that the attribution method (a) ignores the possibility of confounders, i.e., the possibility that non-schistosomiasis factors (such as poverty and general hygiene) are correlated both with schistosomiasis and with the sequelae discussed; (b) is prone to exaggerate the strength of any given relationship (as we believe can be seen by examining the charts).

 

 68. Van der Werf et al. 2003, Pg 132.

 

 69. World Health Organization. The global burden of disease: 2004 update, Pg 110.

 

 70. "Van der Werf MJ, de Vlas SJ. Morbidity and infection with schistosomes or soil-transmitted helminths. Rotterdam, Erasmus University, 2001." World Health Organization. The global burden of disease: 2004 update, Pg 139.

 

 71. One of the most severe symptoms discussed is severe hematemesis (vomiting blood). But Van der Werf et al. rely on self-reported survey data of hematemesis, (Van der Werf and de Vlas 2001, Pgs 62-63) which is problematic because vomiting blood can easily be confused with coughing blood or even a nosebleed (National Institutes of Health. Vomiting blood).

 

 72. "The course of a schistosome infection complicates the prediction of mortality figures. Often there is a long interval between infection and death, most patients that will die of schistosomiasis die more than 10 years after the initial infection. Only a few people will die during or just after the invasion stage of the infection (Katayama fever). Another complicating factor is that the direct cause of death is liver failure or hematemesis. These sequelae can also be induced by other causes, which are prevalent in countries endemic for schistosomiasis, such as hepatitis B infection or excessive alcohol use. Both the long time span between initial infection and mortality and the aspecific direct cause of death complicate the predictions of mortality." Van der Werf and de Vlas 2001, Pg 65. "The GBD 2002 estimated that schistosomiasis was responsible for around 15,000 deaths globally (excluding attributable cancer deaths), although others have argued that the figure should be much higher. [Van der Werf and de Vlas 2001], using limited data from Africa, estimated that schistosomiasis caused 210,000 deaths annually. A literature review found limited data from studies with small sample sizes, limiting ability to extrapolate to population level. In the absence of usable studies, a back-calculation method was employed to estimate approximate case fatality rates for two populations with significant numbers of schistosomiasis deaths recorded in death registration data … [the] revised global estimate for deaths due to schistosomiasis (excluding cancers caused by schistosomiasis) [is] 41,000 for 2004." World Health Organization. The global burden of disease: 2004 update, Pg 110.

 73. World Health Organization. The global burden of disease: 2004 update, Pg 110.

 

 74. “Estimated total malaria deaths for 2004 were 0.89 million, of which 771 000 were in children aged under five years. These estimates are lower than those in the GBD 2002 (1.27 million deaths, of which 1.15 million deaths were of children aged under five years).” World Health Organization. The global burden of disease: 2004 update, Pg 109.

 

 75. GiveWell. Schistosomiasis mortality analysis "YLL per DALY" rows on "From GBD" sheet. For more on these terms, see our discussion of DALYs.

 

 76. Bundy et al. 2004, Pgs 269-273.

 

 77. “There are also more serious consequences of infection, largely associated with obstruction of ducts and intestinal lumen by these large worms. Systematic data on these acute complications are lacking, but the numerous reports based on inpatient records suggest that ascariasis is an important cause of hospitalization in endemic areas (reviewed by Pawlowski & Davies 1989). Ascariasis was the cause of 2.6 per cent of all hospital admissions in Kenya in 1976, and 3 per cent in a children’s hospital in Myanmar between 1981 and 1983 (Stephenson, Lathan & Oduori 1980, Thein-Hlaing 1987). Complications resulting from ascariasis accounted for 0.6 per cent of all admissions to a paediatric surgery department in South Africa in 1987, 5.8 per cent of emergency admissions to a hospital in Mexico in 1975, 10.6 per cent of admissions for acute abdominal emergency to a children’s hospital in Myanmar, and between 0.8 and 2.5 per cent of admissions in a survey of hospitals in China (Flores & Reynaga 1978, World Health Organization 1987, Thein-Hlaing et al. 1990). The most common abdominal emergencies presenting are intestinal obstruction and biliary ascariasis, the proportions varying geographically, perhaps because of differences in diagnostic procedures (Maki 1972). The classical surgical presentation is in patients between 3 and 10 years of age, although adults also may be affected (Davies and Rode 1982, Chai et al. 1991). Laparotomy attributable to ascariasis was the second most common cause of all laparotomies in 2–4 year old children in Durban, Lishiu and Sao Paulo, and the fifth or sixth cause in adults in Myanmar, China and Nigeria (World Health Organization 1987). Reports using unstandardized indicators indicate that between 0.02 and 0.9 per cent of infections may require hospitalization (Pawlowski & Davies 1989), the proportion presumably varying with the local intensity of infection. Thus of the 4.5 per cent of infected children under 10 years of age who are here estimated to exceed the higher threshold of infection, between 0.4 and 20 per cent are likely to require hospitalization. These children will suffer a severely disabling condition, which may be life-threatening (see below), but which can be alleviated by appropriate clinical management. If it is assumed that such cases are managed appropriately, then the duration of disability is likely to be a few weeks. Complicated ascariasis has a reported history of over 10 days followed by 5 days of management, while the management of biliary ascariasis involves 4–6 weeks of observation before opting for surgical intervention (Davies & Rode 1982). The disability therefore is considered, for the present analyses, to be contemporaneous with infection, to have a duration of 4 weeks, to have a severity of Class III (Murray & Lopez 1996), and to affect 5 per cent of children under 15 years of age with burdens exceeding the higher threshold. Note that this is a conservative assumption since it excludes the documented, though rare, occurrence of complications in adults. Furthermore, the case rates for children are based on records from tertiary facilities to which a substantial proportion of the most disadvantaged and heavily infected children may have limited access.” Bundy et al. 2004, Pgs 269-270. “[Mortality] is the weakest area of DALY estimation because of the lack of empirical data. Ascariasis is the best documented helminthiasis in terms of mortality. There are numerous studies of case fatality rates in hospitals (reviewed by Pawlowski & Davies 1989). These indicate that the outcome of acute complications of ascariasis is modified by the general health status of the patient, the intensity of infection and the medical procedure (see Pawlowski & Davies 1989). In one hospital in Sao Paulo, for example, the case fatality rate was 1.35 per cent for conditions which could be managed conservatively, and 26.1 per cent in patients undergoing surgery (Okumura et al. 1974). These studies confirm that death is a not infrequent outcome of complications of ascariasis, but provide little insight into mortality rates in the community. An extrapolation from central hospital data in Myanmar suggests there are 0.008 deaths per 1000 infections per year (Thein-Hliang 1987), but this is considered to be a considerable underestimate since only a small proportion of children with severe complications are likely to have access to the hospital (Pawlowski & Davies 1989). Only two population based estimates are available: one for the Darmstadt epidemic (0.1 deaths per 1000 infected per year) (Krey 1949) and one for Japan prior to national control efforts (0.061 deaths per 1000 infected per year) (Yokogawa 1976). Based on the present estimate of global infection, these rates suggest that between 8 000 and 14 000 children die each year. The final estimate of global mortality due to ascariasis in the Global Burden of Disease project was 11 000 concentrated in the age group 5–14 years (Murray and Lopez 1996). Mortality was distributed by region in proportion to the region-specific population at risk (above higher threshold) and to the region-specific probability of dying between birth and 4 years (World Bank 1993). This last quantity was added to take account of regional variations in access to acute medical services.”Bundy et al. 2004, Pgs 281-282. 

 78. “The disability therefore is considered, for the present analyses, to be contemporaneous with infection, to have a duration of 4 weeks, to have a severity of Class III (Murray & Lopez 1996), and to affect 5 per cent of children under 15 years of age with burdens exceeding the higher threshold.” Bundy et al. 2004, Pgs 269-270. Table 9.9 reports that 525 per 100,000 5-14 year olds in Sub-Saharan Africa have worm burdens exceeding the higher threshold. Bundy et al. 2004, Pg 268. 5% of 525 per 100,000 is 0.0002625. 

 79. Unfortunately, the published version (Bundy et al. 2004) does not contain regionally disambiguated mortality estimates, so we use the figure from the unpublished working paper that was used to generate the DCP's cost-effectiveness estimate, of .3 per 100,000 population. Bundy et al. Intestinal nematode infections, Table 9, Pg 72.

 

 80. “Particularly large burdens of T. trichiura may result in the “classical” dysenteric form of trichuriasis, synonymous with Trichuris Dysentery Syndrome (Ramsey 1962) and Massive Infantile Trichuriasis (Kouri & Valdes Diaz 1952). This typically occurs in children between 3 and 10 years of age and is associated with burdens involving at least several hundreds of worms carpeting the colonic mucosa from ileum to rectum. The colon is inflamed, oedematous and friable, and often bleeds freely (Venugopal et al. 1987). Reviews of case histories suggest that the mean duration of disease at the time of presentation is typically in excess of 12 months and that relapse after treatment frequently occurs (Gilman et al. 1983, Cooper et al. 1990, Callender et al. 1994). The probability of relapse, and of a child experiencing multiple episodes, is greatly enhanced because a proportion of heavily infected children are predisposed to reacquire heavy infection even after successful treatment (Bundy et al. 1987a, 1987b). The typical signs of the syndrome (see Bundy & Cooper 1989a for a review of 13 studies involving 697 patients) are rectal prolapse, tenesmus, bloody mucoid stools (over months or years), growth stunting, and a profound anaemia, which may lead to a secondary anaemia. The complete spectrum of clinical features associated with the syndrome occurs in some 30 per cent of children with intense trichuriasis. Many of the major clinical effects are reversible by appropriate therapy (Cooper, Bundy & Henry 1986, Gilman et al. 1983), hence the disability is considered here to be a contemporaneous consequence of infection.” Bundy et al. 2004, Pgs 271-273.

 

 81. “For the present analyses it is assumed that the disability is contemporaneous with infection, has a duration of over 12 months, has a severity of Class II (Murray & Lopez, 1996), and affects 20 per cent of children under 15 years of age experiencing the higher threshold of intensity.” Bundy et al. 2004, Pg 273. In Sub-Saharan Africa, 680 per 100,000 school-aged children have worm burdens above the higher threshold of intensity. Bundy et al. 2004, Table 9.10, Pg 270. 20% of 680 per 100,000 is 0.00136. 

 82. “No population-based mortality estimates have been published for T. trichiura infection. Prior to the advent of safe and effective therapy for T. trichiura infection in the late 1970s a number of reports described paediatric inpatients with Trichuris Dysentery Syndrome who, despite clinical efforts, died as a result of profuse haemorrhage and secondary anaemia (Wong and Tan 1961, Fisher and Cremin 1970) or of intussusception (Reeder, Astacio & Theros 1968). Although there continue to be reports of the syndrome, a fatal outcome in a clinical setting today would suggest inappropriate management. The picture in the community, however, may be rather different since, in the absence of specific diagnosis, the aetiology of chronic bloody dysentery may be unrecognized. Nevertheless, mortality is undoubtedly a rare consequence of trichuriasis.” Bundy et al. 2004, Pg 282.

 

 83.  “With hookworm the major consequence of infection is anaemia (see Schad & Banwell 1984 and Crompton & Stephenson 1990 for reviews of the extensive literature in this area). Anaemia is associated with: reduced worker productivity; reduced adult and child fitness; reduced fertility in women; reduced intrauterine growth rate, prematurity and low birth weight; and cognitive deficits (Fleming 1982, Stephenson et al.1993, Pol- litt et al. 1986, Boivin et al. 1993) (Tables 9.12a and 9.12b). Since the higher threshold for the intensity of hookworm infection was selected on the basis of the development of anaemia, it is here assumed that 100 per cent of those exceeding this threshold suffer at least Class I disability. As discussed elsewhere (World Bank 1993), the consequences of anaemia will be more serious for a subset of the affected population, resulting in Class II and Class III disability. The disability weight distribution for anaemia was used for the present analyses, 70 per cent in Class II, 24 per cent in Class III and 6 per cent in Class IV.” Bundy et al. 2004, Pg 273.  “The profound anaemia of hookworm infection is life-threatening and has been estimated, although the means of estimation are not described, to result in 65 000 deaths per year (World Health Organization 1992). Again there is a lack of empirical data, presumably in this case because of the difficulty in identifying the etiology of anaemia-related deaths. A figure of 4 300 deaths was used by Murray and Lopez (1996) and was distributed to ascribe the highest proportion of mortality to women of childbearing age (15–44 years) and to older age groups. The distribution of deaths between regions was divided in the same way as for the other infections.” Bundy et al. 2004, Pg 282. 

 84. Mathers, Lopez, and Murray 2006, Pg 162.

 

 85. World Health Organization. Global Burden of Disease 2004: Deaths by Age, Sex, and Cause for the year 2004, sheet 'AFR', cells G39+G40+G41.

 

 86. "Overall child mortality was 5% lower in albendazole than in control blocks, but because randomisation was by block rather than by AWC or by individual this 5% difference is not significant (risk ratio [RR] 0·95, CI 0·88–1·02, p = 0·16). " Pg. 1483. Absolute risk of death: Table 3, pg. 1484. The sample included 1 million children: "Participants in this cluster-randomised study were children in catchment areas of 8338 ICDS-staffed village child-care centres (under-5 population 1 million) in 72 administrative blocks." Pg. 1478. This generated a sample of 25,582 child deaths. "The 238 remaining duplicates at ages 1·0–6·0 years were eliminated in Oxford by computer matches (199 with the same AWC, sex, first three letters of father’s name, and date of death from a disease, 23 with matching for approximate date but closer other similarities, 16 with the same death reported in adjacent AWCs), leaving 25582 child deaths for analysis." Pgs. 1480-1. 

 87. "This study evaluates the economic consequences of the successful eradication of hookworm disease from the American South, which started circa 1910. The Rockefeller Sanitary Commission (RSC) surveyed infection rates and found that 40 percent of school-aged children in the South were infected with hookworm. The RSC then sponsored treatment and education campaigns across the region. Follow-up studies indicate that this campaign substantially reduced hookworm disease almost immediately. Areas with higher levels of hookworm infection prior to the RSC experienced greater increases in school enrollment, attendance, and literacy after the intervention. No significant contemporaneous results are found for literacy or occupational shifts among adults, who had negligible prior infection rates. A long-term follow-up indicates a substantial gain in income that coincided with exposure to hookworm eradication. I also find evidence that the return to schooling increased with eradication." Bleakley 2007, abstract.

 

 88. "First, the RSC sent teams of health-care workers to counties to administer and dispense deworming treatments free of charge. RSC dispensaries visited a large and mostly contiguous fraction of the South and the campaign treated over 400,000 individuals with deworming medication.1 Second, the RSC sought to educate doctors, teach- ers, and the general public on how to recognize the symptoms of . hookworm disease so that fewer cases would go untreated. An- other part of this publicity campaign included education about the importance of hygiene, especially with regard to the use of sanitary privies. In this period, oftentimes even public buildings such as schools and churches did not have such hygienic facilities. Follow-up surveys conducted afterward showed a substantial de- cline in hookworm infection [RSC 19151. Although the stated goal of eradication was not achieved, the hookworm-infection rate of the region did drop by more than half, and fewer extreme cases of the disease went unnoticed and untreated." Bleakley 2007, Pg 77.

 

 89. "The anti-hookworm campaign achieved considerable progress against the disease in less than a decade. This is a sudden change on historical time scales. Moreover, I examine outcomes over a fifty-year time span, which is unquestionably long relative to the five-year RSC intervention … How realistic is the assumption that areas with high infection rates benefited more from the eradication campaign? Re-surveys found a decrease in hookworm infection of 30 percentage points across the infected areas of the South. Such a dramatic drop in the region's average infection rate, barring a drastic reversal in the pattern of hookworm incidence across the region, would have had the supposed effect of reducing infection rates more in highly infected areas than in areas with moderate infection rates. Figure I presents data on this issue. The basic assumption of this section that areas where hookworm was highly endemic saw a greater drop in infection than areas with low infection rates is born out across states and across counties." Bleakley 2007, 80-81.

 

 90. See Bleakley 2007, Figure III, Pg 100. A similar approach is taken for school attendance - see Figure II, Pg 88.

 

 91. "The finding that highly infected counties experienced surges in school attendance is not sensitive to controlling for a variety of alternative hypotheses. I contrast these hypotheses with the effect of hookworm and the RSC by starting with (1) and (2) and adding plausible proxies for the supposed confounds. The control variables enter into the specification interacted with Postt. These results are found in Panel B of Table III. In every case, the added control variables are jointly significant at conventional confidence levels. The new controls include variables for health and health policy, educational resources, race and race relations, urbanization and land use, and parental background. (See the Appendix for a complete list of controls and their sources.)" Bleakley 2007, Pg 90.

 

 92. "I also consider the role played by the quantity of and returns to schooling in the wage results. Controlling directly for education does not significantly change the estimated effect of hookworm treatment. Additionally, I can easily reject, for conventional returns to schooling, the hypothesis that the wage effect is due entirely to a rise in education. 20 However, the fact that I estimate increases in literacy without concomitant rises in the quantity of schooling suggests an alternative hypothesis: changes in quality. In particular, it may be that students spend the same number of years in school, but the time is better spent. For example, there might be less absenteeism, or students might be better equipped to absorb the material while in school. As was shown above, students were less likely to work while in school and were more likely to be literate, following hookworm eradication. This suggests that the return to schooling was raised by the hookworm intervention." Bleakley 2007, Pg 97.

 

 93. "Following World Health Organization recommendations (WHO (1992)), schools with geohelminth prevalence over 50 percent were mass treated with albendazole every six months, and schools with schistosomiasis prevalence over 30 percent were mass treated with praziquantel annually. All treatment schools met the geohelminth cut-off in both 1998 and 1999. Six of twenty-five treatment schools met the schistosomiasis cut-off in 1998 and sixteen of fifty treatment schools met the cut-off in 1999." Miguel and Kremer 2004, Pg 168-169. 

 

 94. "The 75 schools involved in this program were experimentally divided into three groups (Groups 1, 2, and 3) of 25 schools each: the schools were first stratified by administrative sub-unit (zone), listed alphabetically by zone, and were then listed in order of enrollment within each zone, and every third school was assigned to a given program group; supplementary appendix A contains a detailed description of the experimental design. The groups are well-balanced along baseline demographic and educational characteristics, both in terms of mean differences and distributions, where we assess the latter with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test of the equality of distributions (Table 1). The same balance is also evident among the subsample of respondents currently working for wages (see Supplementary Appendix Table A1)." Baird et al. 2011, Pg 6-7.

 

 95. "Children in Group 1 and 2 schools thus were assigned to receive 2.41 more years of deworming than Group 3 children on average (Table 1), and these early beneficiaries are what we call the deworming treatment group below. We focus on a single treatment indicator rather than separating out effects for Group 1 versus Group 2 schools since this simplifies the analysis, and because we find few statistically significant differences between Group 1 and 2 (not shown)." Baird et al. 2011, Pg 7. "We focus on the KLPS-2 data, rather than KLPS-1, in this paper since it was collected at a more relevant time point for us to assess adult life outcomes: the majority of sample respondents are adults by 2007-09 (with median age at 22 years as opposed to 18 in KLPS-1), have completed their schooling, many have married, and a growing share are engaging in wage employment or self- employment, as shown graphically in Figure 2." Baird et al. 2011, Pg 10. 

 96. "The question of whether – and how much – child health gains improve adult living standards is of major intellectual interest and public policy importance. We exploit a prospective study of deworming in Kenya that began in 1998, and utilize a new dataset with an effective tracking rate of 83% over a decade, at which point most subjects were 19 to 26 years old. Treatment individuals received two to three more years of deworming than the comparison group. Among those with wage employment, earnings are 21 to 29% higher in the treatment group, hours worked increase by 12%, and work days lost to illness fall by a third. A large share of the earnings gains are explained by sectoral shifts, for instance, through a doubling of manufacturing employment and a drop in casual labor. Small business performance also improves significantly among the self-employed. Total years enrolled in school, test scores and self-reported health improve significantly, suggesting that both education and health gains are plausible channels." Baird et al. 2011, abstract.

 

 97. "These labor market gains are accompanied by marked shifts in employment sector for the treatment group, with more than a doubling of well-paid manufacturing jobs (especially among males) and declines in both casual labor and domestic services employment. Changes in the subsector of employment account for nearly all of the earnings gains in deworming treatment group in a Oaxaca-style decomposition." Baird et al. 2011, Pg 3. "The most striking impacts are a large increase in manufacturing work for deworming treatment individuals, with a point estimate of 0.072 (s.e. 0.024, Table 4), signifying a tripling of manufacturing employment overall. The gains among males are particularly pronounced at 0.090(s.e. 0.030). The two most common types of manufacturing jobs in our sample are in food processing and textiles, with establishments ranging in size from small local corn flour mills up to large blanket factories in Nairobi. On the flip side, casual labor employment falls significantly (-0.038, s.e. 0.018), as does domestic service work for females (-0.174, s.e. 0.110), although this latter effect is only marginally significant … One explanation for this pattern that ties into our earlier labor supply findings is that child health investments improve individuals’ capacity to carry out physically demanding, characterized by long work weeks and little tolerance of absenteeism, and thus allow them to access higher paid jobs such as those in manufacturing." Baird et al. 2011, Pg 24-25.

 98. "Deworming treatment individuals consume 0.096 more meals (s.e. 0.028, significant at 99% confidence, Panel C) than the control group, and the externality impact is also large and positive (0.080, s.e. 0.023, 99% confidence). This suggests that deworming led to living standard gains in the full sample." Baird et al. 2011, Pg 17. See Pg 41 for full set of related results, including overall household consumption.

 

 99. "There is evidence that adult health also improved as a result of deworming. Respondent self-reported health (on a normalized 0 to 1 scale) improved by 0.041 (s.e. 0.018, significant at 95% confidence, Table 11, panel A). Many studies have found that self-reported health reliably predicts actual morbidity and mortality even when other known health risk factors are accounted for (Idler and Benyamini 1997, Haddock et al. 2006, Brook et al. 1984). Note that it is somewhat difficult to interpret this impact causally since it may partially reflect health gains driven by the higher adult earnings detailed above, in addition to the direct health benefits of earlier deworming. Yet the fact that there were similar positive and statistically significant impacts on self-reported health in earlier periods, namely, in surveys administered in 1999 before most in sample individuals were working (see Table 11, panel C and Miguel and Kremer 2004), suggests that at least part of the effect is directly due to deworming. In terms of other health outcomes, there is no evidence that deworming improved self- reported happiness or wellbeing or reduced major health shocks. Total health expenditures by the respondent in the last month are significantly higher in the treatment group (91.1 Shillings, s.e. 30.0), suggesting that they may have greater ability or willingness to make health investments, but interpretation is again complicated by the fact that such spending also reflects health needs. Despite the finding that the number of meals consumed is larger for deworming treatment individuals (in Table 8), deworming did not lead to higher body mass index (Table 11, Panel B). Nor are there detectable height gains, and these non-impacts hold even when we restrict attention to younger individuals (those in grades 2-4 in 1998, regression not shown)." Baird et al. 2011, Pg 22-23. See Pg 44 for full related results, including height, weight-for-height (body mass index) and health spending.

 

 100. "We examine school enrollment and attendance using two different data sources in Table 9. In Panel A, the dependent variable is school enrollment as reported by the respondent in the KLPS-2 survey, which equals one if the individual was enrolled for at least part of a given year. These show consistently positive effects from 1999 to 2007 both on the deworming treatment indicator and the externalities term, and the total increase in school enrollment in treatment relative to control schools over the period is 0.279 years (s.e. 0.147, significant at 90% confidence). Note that there is no treatment effect estimate for 1998 since all students were enrolled at some point in 1998, as a criterion for inclusion in the KLPS sample. The treatment effect estimates are largest during 1999- 2003 before tailing off during 2004-07, as predicted in the optimal educational investment framework above since the current opportunity cost of time is rising relative to the later benefits of schooling as individuals age.

 The data in Panel B is school participation, namely, being found present in school by survey enumerators on the day of an unannounced school attendance check. This is our most objective measure of actual time spent at school, and was a main outcome measure in Miguel and Kremer (2004). The enrollment measure in Panel A misses much of the attendance variation captured in this measure. However, two important limitations of the school participation data are that it was only collected during 1998-2001, and only at primary schools in the study area; the falling sample size between 1998 to 2001 is mainly driven by students graduating from primary school. School participation rates also rise significantly in the deworming treatment group, by 0.074 (s.e. 0.023) and 0.068 (s.e. 0.023) in 1998 and 1999, respectively, before dropping off somewhat in later years (particularly in 2000). Total school participation gains are 0.129 of a year of schooling (s.e. 0.064, significant at 95% confidence). Given that the school enrollment data misses out on attendance impacts, which are sizeable, a plausible lower bound on the total increase in time spent in school induced by the deworming intervention is the 0.129 gain in school participation from 1998-2001 plus the school enrollment gains from 2002-2007, which works out to 0.304 years of schooling." Baird et al. 2011, Pg 21-22. 

 "Test score performance is another natural way to assess deworming impacts on human capital and skills. While the impact of deworming on primary school academic test score performance in 1999 is positive but not statistically significant (Table 10, Panel B), there is suggestive evidence that the passing rate did improve on the key primary school graduation exam, the Kenya Certificate of Primary Education (point estimate 0.046, s.e. 0.031). There is also some evidence that English vocabulary knowledge (collected during the 2007-09 survey) is somewhat higher in the deworming treatment group (impact of 0.076 standard deviations in a normalized distribution, s.e., 0.055). The mean effect size of the 1999 test score, the indicator for passing the primary school leaving exam, and the English vocabulary score in 2007-09 taken together does yield a normalized point estimate of 0.112 that is statistically significant at 90% confidence (s.e. 0.067), providing suggestive evidence of moderate human capital gains in the treatment group. As expected, there is no effect on the Raven’s Matrices cognitive exam, which is designed to capture general intelligence rather than acquired skills (Panel B). While many would argue that nutritional gains in the first few years of life could in fact generate improved cognitive functioning as captured in a Raven’s exam – as [Ozier 2011] indeed does find among younger siblings of the deworming beneficiaries – it was apparently already 'too late' for such gains among the primary school age children in our study." Baird et al. 2011, Pg 22.

 

 101. "The most important factor in the econometric identification strategy is the randomized assignment of pupils to deworming treatment through the deworming program. Group 1 schools received free deworming treatment starting in 1998; Group 2 schools began in 1999, while Group 3 schools began receiving treatment in 2001. All school re- ceived treatment from 2001-2003. Thus in 1998, Group 1 schools were treatment schools, while Group 2 and 3 were comparison schools. In 1999, Group 1 and Group 2 schools were treatment schools and Group 3 schools were control schools. Table 4.1 shows the PSDP treatment schedule. Our sample consists of pupils that were in grades 2-7 in 1998 (primary school goes through grade 8). This variation in group, as well as variation in initial grade, provides us with between zero and six years of treatment for each individual. For example, a Group 1 pupil in grade 2 in 1998 would be assigned six years of treatment, while a Group 3 pupil in grade 6 in 1998 would be assigned only one." Baird 2007 (unpublished dissertation), Pg 106-107.

 

 102. Baird 2007 (unpublished dissertation), Table 4.8, Pg 138.

 

 103. "Along with health outcomes we also look at the impact of years of deworming on a number of education and labor market outcomes. Given that we see benefits to health from deworming, we might expect that these gains would translate into educational gains. The education results are shown in Table 4.12. We do see some evidence that deworming treatment decreases your likelihood of dropping out for the overall sample, which is driven by benefits for males and those in low infection areas. Increasing treatment from zero to six years decreases your likelihood of dropping out by 6 percent and is significant at the 10% level. These results are similar to those found by Johnson and Schoeni (2007) for the US, who find that low birth weight (their measure of health status) does not influence results for highest grade attended, but does affect dropout rates. It is interesting that our significant education results are for different sub-groups than our health results. This observation suggests that our education gains are not necessarily being driven by health gains. Overall, we see very little in terms of educational or labor market gains when looking at our overall sample or our sub-samples. The coefficients are generally positive, but insignificant. With our sample still in a very transitional stage with many still in school, and others still moving between school and the labor force, it is hard to draw conclusive results from this evidence. We will have clearer results (or absence ofresults) for the impact of deworming on education and labor force participation once we collect the third round of data." Baird 2007 (unpublished dissertation), Pg 122. 

 

 104. "We do find consistent negative impacts of deworming on cognitive performance, although for the most part these results are insignificant and small. Looking at the mean effect result for the entire sample, one finds that increasing treatment by one year decreases, albeit insignificantly, the average cognitive score by 0.005 standard deviations. These negative coefficients may result from the fact that treatment leads more vulnerable pupils to stay in school, pupils who are likely to have lower test scores to begin with." Baird 2007 (unpublished dissertation), Pg 122.

 

 105. See the "How well would the studies generalize to other settings?" section of our 2012 blog post on the studies.

 

 106. Deworming substantially improved health and school participation among untreated children in both treatment schools and neighboring schools, and these externalities are large enough to justify fully subsidizing treatment." Miguel and Kremer 2004, abstract.

  More at our 2012 blog post and full writeup on the topic.

 

 107. Ozier 2011, Pg 9.

 

 108. Praziquantel:

 "Praziquantel is administered orally at a standard dose of 40 mg/kg body weight. The most common adverse effects are gastrointestinal, including abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea, and are usually mild and last less than 24 hours." Danso-Appiah et al. 2008. 2008, Pg 4. "Praziquantel and metrifonate were both found to be efficacious with few adverse events, although adverse outcomes were poorly assessed." Danso-Appiah et al. 2008, abstract. Saconato and Atallah 2009, Pg 20 lists clinical side effects from praziquantel based on the studies it reviews. Those whose 95% confidence intervals do not include zero are statistically significant effects: headache, nausea, abdominal pain, fever. Notes from our site visit to the Schistosomiasis Control Initiative (SCI) include reports of fainting and vomiting at a stakeholders' meeting. SCI's representative stated that these can be prevented by feeding children prior to treatment.Albendazole: 

"Albendazole is administered orally (usually as single 400 mg dose), and reported adverse effects include gastrointestinal upsets, headaches, and dizziness, while rash, fever, elevated liver enzymes, and hair loss occur less frequently. There have been reports of elevated liver enzymes, headaches, loss of hair, low levels of white blood cells (neutropenia), fever, and itching if taken at higher doses and/or for a long period of time." Danso-Appiah et al. 2008, Pg 4.  "Two trials looked at adverse events, but the trials were small. Further research is needed … Only two trials provided this information (Michaelsen 1985; Fox 2005). Fox 2005 found no serious adverse events (albendazole 0/46 versus placebo 0/43). Myalgia and cough were reported significantly more frequently in the placebo group compared to al- bendazole. Michaelsen 1985, which used tetrachlorethylene, re- ported that 17%(19/119: results not given for separate trial arms) of the children suffered adverse effects (nausea and ataxia) that began one and a half hours after treatment. All symptoms disappeared within four hours. This drug is not in current use as a deworming drug." Taylor-Robinson, Jones, and Garner 2007, abstract and Pg 21-22. "It has been suggested that resistance to deworming drugs may be a factor that limits the effectiveness of periodic deworming (Hotez et al. 2006). Some people have also questioned whether albendazole itself can adversely affect growth (Hotez et al. 2006)." Taylor-Robinson, Jones, and Garner 2007, Pg 27.

 109. Ibid.

 

 110. "A concern about the feasibility of sustainable control with BZAs is the possible emergence of drug resistance among human STHs. BZA resistance occurs because of the spread of point mutations in nematode-tubulin alleles. This phenomenon has already resulted in widespread BZA drug resistance among STHs of ruminant livestock. There is still no direct evidence for BZA resistance among human STHs, although such resistance could account for an observed failure of mebendazole for human hookworm in southern Mali, as well as a diminished efficacy against hookworm in Zanzibar following frequent and periodic use of mebendazole (Albonico and others 2003). PZQ resistance must also be considered, especially as it begins to be widely used in Sub-Saharan Africa (Hagan and others 2004). Should PZQ resistance develop, there will be new demands for antischistosomal drugs. Recently, the artemisins have shown activity against schistosomulae and were successful in protecting against S. japonicum in China (Hagan and others 2004)." Jamison et al. 2006, Pg 479.

 

 111. A 2011 review (which we have not deeply vetted) found no compelling evidence of resistance: "Geerts and Gryseels (2001) reviewed the reports on drug resistance in human helminths and concluded that two studies (De Clercq et al., 1997; Reynoldson et al., 1997) provided data suggestive for the development of AR in hookworms, but actually fell short of providing conclusive evidence. De Clercq et al. (1997) observed no reduction in the number of Necator eggs and a CR of only 22.9% after treatment with a single dose of MEB 500 mg. A standard egg hatch assay indicated that the Mali strain of N. americanus was almost twice as resistant to BZ as the laboratory reference strain (ED50 of 0.117 compared to 0.069). However, the significance of this differ- ence in ED50 is difficult to assess given the very different genetic backgrounds of the isolates. A similar study in the same region (Sacko et al., 1999) with a single dose of ALB 400 mg resulted in a CR of 51.4% and a ERR of 77.6%, both significantly higher than re- ported earlier by De Clercq et al. (1997). Thus the studies fell short of providing conclusive evidence of AR against BZ in Mali. The most likely reason for the failure of PYR (10 mg/kg) in the treatment of Ancylostoma (ERR of 46% and CR of 13%) according to Reynoldson et al. (1997) was the development of resistance as a consequence of the drug’s frequent use in the community over many years. However, the low number of patients (n = 15) and the high pre-treatment egg counts (mean baseline FEC = 869 EPG) may have affected the estimate of efficacy. In Vietnam, a single dose MEB was found to have disappointing efficacy against hookworm infections (reduction of mean EPG rel- ative to placebo was only 31%) (Flohr et al., 2007). However, AR seemed unlikely as repeated dosing with MEB during 3 consecutive days in a second study resulted in a reduction of the mean EPG rel- ative to placebo by 63%. It should also be noted that the second study was conducted among adults (in contrast to children in the first study) with higher pre-treatment burdens compared to the first study (2210 EPG vs. 263 EPG), potentially confounding com- parison and/or leading to bias. On Pemba Island, Zanzibar, the efficacy of MEB against hook- worms in school children appeared to have fallen over a period of 5 years, during which time the children were regularly treated with MEB (ERR fell from 82.4% to 52.1%). This suggested the possi- bility of emergence of MEB-resistant hookworms on Pemba Island (Albonico et al., 2003). In support, an in vitro study using an egg hatch assay showed a lower thiabendazole ED50compared to the veterinary resistance-threshold for Haemonchus contortus. How- ever, this comparison between livestock and human worm species is far from ideal, and more studies are required before a specific efficacy/resistance threshold for human hookworms can be unequivocally agreed (Albonico et al., 2005) (see Section 7.2). Molecular studies were conducted on the hookworm population of Pemba Island but no evidence was found for the b-tubulin muta- tion at amino acid residue 200 (Phe/Tyr) (Albonico et al., 2004b; Schwenkenbecher et al., 2007). No studies have been published on AR in A. lumbricoides. The presence of the Phe200Tyr SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) in b-tubulin was detected in low frequency in T. trichiura from non-treated people from Kenya and at high frequency in T. trichiura from treated people from Panama (Diawara et al., 2009). However, these SNP frequencies could not be linked to AR as sample sizes were small, anthelmintic efficacy was not assessed, and drug trea- ted and non-treated samples were from different locations. To date all reports indicating disappointing efficacy among the BZs have concerned MEB, and even in studies where MEB had low efficacy (Sacko et al., 1999), ALB was used as the positive con- trol and showed extremely high efficacy against hookworms (See also Vercruysse et al., 2011). It is therefore of some concern that a recent report from Ghana has indicated a high failure rate for ALB in the treatment of hookworm infections (Humphries et al., 2011). Although the ERR was 82% following treatment of 102 in- fected subjects, the CR was only 61%. Even more worrying was the observation that within the group that did not respond to ALB treatment, FECs did not drop after treatment. While this study was not primarily designed as an anthelmintic trial, the work was thoroughly conducted and analyzed, and the ALB tablets were con- firmed as actually having been swallowed by all study subjects. To conclude, the number of studies assessing AR in human STH is currently very limited, and the studies to date suffer from a num- ber of serious flaws: almost none deal with potential confounding factors (e.g. quality of the drugs), many are based on only low numbers of subjects and are significantly underpowered, the ab- sence of standardised protocols and diagnostic techniques, and a lack of any agreed thresholds for defining AR. Therefore, it remains uncertain still whether the reports on reduced efficacy in hook- worms represent genuine cases of AR, based on the selection of resistance alleles in the parasites, or rather, whether they simply reflect reduced efficacy." Vercruysse et al. 2011, pgs. 16-17.

 

 112. "Choking: The WHO has raised concerns about the prevalence of choking in young children (aged between 1 to 3 years), with sev- eral pages of recommendations about how to administer albenda- zole in tablet form without children choking (http://www.who.int/ wormcontrol/newsletter/PPC8 ̇eng.pdf ) WHO 2007. Although common sense might suggest this is a rare occurrence, nevertheless some might argue there is a lack of evidence on the safety of administering deworming drugs to young children in tablet form in a community setting." Pg. 23.

 

 113. The Times of India 2012. 

 

 114. World Health Organization. Preventive chemotherapy in human helminthiasis, Pg 41.

 

 115. World Health Organization. Preventive chemotherapy in human helminthiasis, Pg 41.

 

 116. World Health Organization. Preventive chemotherapy in human helminthiasis, Pg 41.

 

 117. “The age-dependent patterns of infection prevalence are generally similar among the major helminth species, exhibiting a rise in childhood to a relatively stable asymptote in adulthood (figure 24.1). Maximum prevalence of A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura is usually attained before five years of age, and the maximum prevalence of hookworm and schistosome infec- tions is usually attained in adolescence or in early adulthood. The nonlinear relationship between prevalence and intensity has the consequence that the observed age-prevalence profiles provide little indication of the underlying profiles of age inten- sity (age in relation to worm burden). Because intensity is linked to morbidity, the age-intensity profiles provide a clearer understanding of which populations are vulnerable to the different helminths (figure 24.1). For A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura infections, the age-intensity profiles are typically convex in form, with the highest intensities in children 5 to 15 years of age [Bundy et al. 2004]. For schistosomiasis, a convex pattern is also observed, with a similar peak but with a plateau in adolescents and young adults 15 to 29 years of age (Kabatereine and others 1999). In contrast, the age-intensity profile for hookworm exhibits considerable variation, although intensity typically increases with age until adulthood and then plateaus (Brooker, Bethony, and Hotez 2004). In East Asia it is also common to find the highest intensities among the elderly. However, more generally, children and young adults are at higher risk of both harboring higher levels of infection (thus greater levels of morbidity) and becoming reinfected more quickly. Both may occur at vital stages in a child’s intellectual and physical development.” Hotez et al. 2006, Pgs 469-470.

 

 118. "The aim is morbidity control: periodic treatment of at-risk populations will cure subtle morbidity and prevent infected individuals from developing severe, late-stage morbidity due to schistosomiasis.” World Health Organization. Preventive chemotherapy in human helminthiasis, Pg 60.

 

 119. We searched on Google Scholar for "deworming systematic review," "deworming randomized controlled trial," "Soil-transmitted helminths systematic review," "Soil-transmitted helminths randomized controlled trial," "Schistosomiasis systematic review," "Schistosomiasis randomized controlled trial," "Deworming drug resistance," "Soil-transmitted helminths drug resistance," "Schistosomiasis drug resistance," "deworming," and "albendazole malaria." To try to find randomized controlled trials of STH deworming, we searched for "randomized controlled" + each of "helminth," "ascaris," "trichuris," "Ancylostoma duodenale," "Necator americanus," "albendazole," "strongyloid," "hookworm," "roundworm," "pinworm," and "whipworm."

                          Contact Stay updated FAQ For Charities Site map Privacy Policy Jobs       Follow Us: Facebook Twitter RSS   Subscribe to email updates:  GiveWell, aka The Clear Fund (a tax-exempt 501(c)(3) public charity), was founded in 2007. We serve donors across the Globe; GiveWell's donors are based primarily in the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, and Canada. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share alike 3.0 United States License              try { clicky.init(78566); }catch(e){} 

     window.intercomSettings = { "app_id": "you5eu27" };   (function($) { $(document).ready(function() { // const tippy = require('tippy.js').default; tippy('.tippy', { content: '[data-tippy-content]', followCursor: "true", placement: "bottom", }); }); window.addEventListener('scroll', () => { tippy.hideAll() }) })(jQuery);