By the way, sometime yesterday this blog received its millionth visit.
By the way, sometime yesterday this blog received its millionth visit.
Lots of good stuff happening in math blogging!
This is the thousandth post.
I was going to use this space to give you some statistics, maybe make a Wordle, etc., but I couldn’t figure out how to get WordPress to give me the relevant statistics.
So let’s just say I’ve written a lot of stuff on this blog. No way is the mean post less than 200 words long, so let’s say close to a thousand print pages. And I’m really, really glad. I know lots of people think the blog is dead and we’re all to fling aphorisms at each other on Twitter and Facebook instead. I love aphorism-flinging, but, for me, blogging sits in a kind of perfect sweet spot; “published” enough that I feel someone’s out there reading, informal enough that I don’t mind making mistakes, short enough that I can bang out a post without compromising a workday, long enough that I can shape an argument that’s not just an aphorism. Writing this blog, and reading other people’s blogs, has enriched my published writing and my mathematics too. And I think in some small way it’s been useful to others — the blog has been cited at least 4 times on the arXiv! That’s more than plenty of my papers.
I don’t care if the blog is dead — if you’re on the fence about starting one, I say you should do it.
A few notes:
I’m told that one trick to the astonishing feats carried out by world-class competitive eaters is that your satiety sensor is on something like a twenty-minute delay; so you can really pack an immense amount of food into your body before your brain realizes you’re doing something your stomach doesn’t want you to do.
I was talking to a colleague who wants to start a blog and asked for some advice, and I realized that blogging is kind of like this, too. My math posts are very casual and full of mistakes, and the reason is that my practice is to write a post as soon as it occurs to me — I then have about a half hour before my brain says “Wait, you’re supposed to be working right now.” So in that half hour I have to write as fast as I can, like Kobayashi smashing hot dogs into his mouth.
Yes, this is me blogging:
Is this a good time to mention that I once drank a gallon of milk in four minutes? Here are my tips for success at this important task:
I’ve been thinking about changing the theme of this blog. But I realize that I have very little knowledge about blog design. Some things I thought I might like:
But you are the people reading this, so your opinions matter more than mine! Are serif fonts indeed more reasonable? Is wider better or worse? (I keep the browser window very wide, like a screen, but for all I know, maybe people use the aspect ratio of a piece of paper.) Am I right that it’s completely unacceptable for only excerpts from the post to appear on the front page?
Feel free to suggest specific themes or general design principles. I just want to be presentable!
Those of us outside Silicon Valley tend to think of it as a single entity — but venture capitalists and developers are not the same people and don’t have the same goals. I learned about this from David Carlton’s blog post. Cathy O’Neil reposted it this morning. It’s kind of cool that the three of us, who started grad school together and worked with Barry Mazur, are all actively blogging! We just need to get Matt Emerton in on it and then we’ll have the complete set. Maybe we could even launch a new blogging platform and call it mazr. You want startup culture, I’ll give you startup culture!
The comments on yesterday’s post turned into another boring “feminism sux / feminism roolz” thread. I get it — some people think it’s worth thinking about gender issues in math, some people don’t, people are going to have that discussion. Fine.
My request: if you are going to comment on a “women in math,” thread, or for that matter, any other thread that gets people’s political dander up, try to direct your comment at the material of the particular post. If your comment would apply equally well to any imaginable post about women in math, then maybe don’t post it.
This month’s On Wisconsin has a feature on UW faculty blogs, including this one. I had no idea there were so many! John Hawks, who writes bracingly about anthropology, is said to get 8,000 hits a day. (I get…. fewer than that.) Deborah Blum, who teaches our aspiring science journalists, stands up for science blogging at Speakeasy Science. Economics prof Menzie Chinn co-blogs at Econbrowser; lots of good material up there right now about the state of the Wisconsin budget. And our communications grad students have a group blog, Antenna: great news for people like me who have no idea what our communications grad students do. (It seems that among other things they think carefully about reality TV, an activity of which I approve.)
Use comments to promote any UW blogs the article missed!
Reader majordomo comments on my post about the Sat. Nite Duets/Fatty Acids:
What is with you and obscure bands, I don’t understand your obsession with nameless, obscure bands. You’re probably one of those guys who hate the Beatles because too many people like them, right ?
Actually, no. When I was 11 the only two albums I owned were Beatles best-ofs, the Blue Album and the Red Album. I thought the Beatles were the best band in the history of rock music. And I still think so!
But the Beatles have armies of people to write about their greatness. Who will blog about Sat. Nite Duets and Fatty Acids, or Yellow Ostrich, or Grammar, or Carsick Cars, or The Stevedores, if not me? These people work hard on their records, they give them away free or almost free — why shouldn’t they get some tiny signal from the world outside that somebody liked the songs they wrote?
By the way, I went to the show to see Sat. Nite Duets but Fatty Acids turned out to be great too. Here’s “Astrovan”:
I hope that was not annoying to majordomo. In case it was, here’s “I am the Walrus.” CJ watches this video a lot and I’ve fallen in love with the song all over again. How do they get so much stuff in there?
Good Lord, did you know Styx covered “I am the Walrus?” I did not. It is awful.
As it happens, I actually had a post about Styx in mind! I’ll put it up now. I hope it is mainstream enough for majordomo.