On the Economic Impact of Malaria Control, Some Discordant Evidence

17 Pages Posted: 23 Nov 2013 Last revised: 7 Nov 2016

See all articles by Richard Sedlmayr

Richard Sedlmayr

University of Oxford, Blavatnik School of Government, Students

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: January 13, 2014

Abstract

This cluster randomized trial evaluates the economic impact of a private sector malaria control program. In collaboration with 81,597 smallholder contract farmers in 1,507 clusters, I investigate whether the distribution of free insecticide-treated mosquito nets at the outset of malaria season increased cotton output sufficiently to be commercially viable for the implementing agribusiness. But despite large health effects in farming households, I do not detect any impact on deliveries to the agribusiness. I conclude that the independent and sustained distribution of free mosquito nets by Zambia’s cotton industry is unlikely to materialize without subsidies. While the results appear to run contrary to literature on the economic impact of malaria, they can be partially reconciled with literature on the labor decisions of smallholder farmers.

Keywords: Malaria, insecticide-treated nets, smallholder, outgrowers, contract farming, agricultural productivity, public-private partnerships

JEL Classification: C930, I380, Q120

Suggested Citation

Sedlmayr, Richard, On the Economic Impact of Malaria Control, Some Discordant Evidence (January 13, 2014). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2358045 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2358045

Richard Sedlmayr (Contact Author)

University of Oxford, Blavatnik School of Government, Students ( email )

10 Merton Street
Oxford, Oxfordshire OX1 4JJ
United Kingdom

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
179
Abstract Views
1,944
rank
161,462
PlumX Metrics