Will Companies Make Good on Cage-Free Pledges? | Open Philanthropy                          @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/modules/system/system.base.css?qgstca"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/modules/system/system.menus.css?qgstca"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/modules/system/system.messages.css?qgstca"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/modules/system/system.theme.css?qgstca");   @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/modules/contrib/jquery_update/replace/ui/themes/base/minified/jquery.ui.core.min.css?qgstca"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/modules/contrib/jquery_update/replace/ui/themes/base/minified/jquery.ui.theme.min.css?qgstca"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/modules/contrib/jquery_update/replace/ui/themes/base/minified/jquery.ui.accordion.min.css?qgstca");   @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/modules/contrib/comment_notify/comment_notify.css?qgstca"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/modules/comment/comment.css?qgstca"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/modules/contrib/date/date_api/date.css?qgstca"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/modules/contrib/date/date_popup/themes/datepicker.1.7.css?qgstca"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/modules/field/theme/field.css?qgstca"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/modules/contrib/footnotes/footnotes.css?qgstca"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/modules/custom/grants_summary/grants_summary.css?qgstca"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/modules/node/node.css?qgstca"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/modules/search/search.css?qgstca"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/modules/user/user.css?qgstca"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/modules/contrib/views/css/views.css?qgstca"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/modules/contrib/caption_filter/caption-filter.css?qgstca"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/modules/contrib/ckeditor/css/ckeditor.css?qgstca");   @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/modules/contrib/ctools/css/ctools.css?qgstca"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/modules/contrib/typogrify/typogrify.css?qgstca"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/modules/contrib/content_type_extras/css/content_type_extras.css?qgstca"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/modules/contrib/flippy/flippy.css?qgstca"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/modules/contrib/ckeditor/css/ckeditor.editor.css?qgstca"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/modules/filter/filter.css?qgstca"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/default/files/honeypot/honeypot.css?qgstca");   @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/themes/op_basic/styles/css/global/normalize.css?qgstca"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/themes/op_basic/styles/css/global/op-fonts.css?qgstca"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/themes/op_basic/styles/css/global/html.css?qgstca"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/themes/op_basic/styles/css/global/meanmenu.css?qgstca"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/themes/op_basic/styles/css/global/global.css?qgstca"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/themes/op_basic/styles/css/pages/pages.css?qgstca"); @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/themes/op_basic/styles/css/pages/custom.css?qgstca");   @import url("https://web.archive.org./web/20201027160921cs_/https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/all/themes/op_basic/styles/css/global/admin.css?qgstca");                                                 Jump to Navigation            Research & IdeasCause Selection Notable Lessons Cause Reports Conversations History of Philanthropy  Focus AreasU.S. Policy Criminal Justice Reform Farm Animal Welfare Macroeconomic Stabilization Policy Immigration Policy Land Use Reform Global Catastrophic Risks Biosecurity and Pandemic Preparedness Potential Risks from Advanced Artificial Intelligence Scientific Research Global Health & Development Other areas  GivingGrants Database Current Priorities Guide for Grant Seekers Grantmaking Stages  About UsWho We Are Vision & Values Openness Progress to Date Team Press Kit  Blog Get InvolvedContact Us Stay Updated Working at Open Phil          Search form  Search                     Home / Blog       ‹ Previous Post   Next Post ›      Will Companies Make Good on Cage-Free Pledges?         FacebookTwitterPrintSaveRSSEmail          by Lewis Bollard Published August 20, 2019       Note: This post originally appeared in the monthly farm animal welfare newsletter written by our farm animal welfare team. Sign up here to receive regular email updates with research and insights into a farm animal advocacy research topic. We decided to cross-post this one because we thought it was especially interesting and wanted to make people aware of the newsletter, but note that the newsletter is not thoroughly vetted by other staff and does not necessarily represent consensus views of the Open Philanthropy Project as a whole.

 From 2015-17, advocates secured pledges from over 300 US food companies to eliminate battery cages for the more than 240M egg-laying hens in their supply chains, mostly by 2025. (Advocates also secured another 800+ pledges from non-US food companies — the subject of a future newsletter.)

 This was a big win for the farm animal movement. Fewer than 50 full-time advocates pushed the $9B US egg industry to commit to eliminate its core business practice — confining hens in tiny cages — at a cost to the industry of $7B-$9.5B. A 2016 Washington Post front-page story declared a “victory for the animal welfare movement”, noting that even egg producers think a “cage-free future is a fait accompli.” 

  In an excellent new post, Rethink Priorities’ Saulius Šimčikas assesses the cost-effectiveness of these campaigns and the global cage-free ones that followed them. He finds that, even accounting for the millions spent on investigations and other advocacy that only indirectly supported the campaigns, they affected 12 to 160 years of animal life per dollar spent. 

 But, two years on, there are worrying signs that some companies may not follow through on their pledges. Marriott and Burger King postponed their 2015 and 2017 pledges, while Disney and Hilton only partially fulfilled theirs. Some egg producers have halted cage-free conversion plans, citing weak demand. A new survey finds the largest US egg producers think most hens will still be caged in 2025. 

 A great new report by Charity Entrepreneurship’s Karolina Sarek reflects this concern. She reviews historical and industry evidence that weighs on the topic, for instance finding that four major food companies kept only about half of their corporate social responsibility pledges since 2000. She concludes that we should expect just under half of companies making new animal welfare pledges to follow through on them.

 Even legislative bans are under threat. Michigan egg producers, who in 2009 supported a compromise cage ban to take effect in 2019, have been lobbying to delay the ban’s implementation. And while the King Amendment is now happily dead, 13 factory farm states are continuing a federal lawsuit to strike down California’s and Massachusetts’ cage bans.

 So are we doomed to a future with battery cages?

 The Good News I don’t think so. US egg producers aren’t scrapping cages fast enough, but they are scrapping them. In 2014, the year cage-free corporate campaigns began in earnest, 17M hens, or 6% of the US flock, were cage-free; today 67M hens, or 20% of the national flock, are. That trend should continue: egg producers say they plan to add or convert cage-free housing for 12M hens in 2019 (though they also plan to add cages for 1M). Given most pledges only come due in 2025, it’s surprising there’s already been this much progress.

  The US cage-free flock has expanded significantly since corporate campaigns began in 2014. Source: USDA.

 The progress has been driven by major retailers. Costco has achieved the most impressive gains: when advocates waged a major campaign against it, in 2015, 26% of its eggs sales were cage-free; today 89% are. The four biggest grocers in America — Walmart, Kroger, UNFI (Supervalu), and Albertsons — are less far along, at 12 - 29% cage-free, but still collectively account for about 14M cage-free hens due to their scale.

 Prices suggest this progress will continue. The egg industry has pitched numerous media pieces on weak consumer demand for cage-free eggs. But USDA data shows that retailers are selling cage-free eggs for 2-3X the price of caged eggs, even though they only cost about 36% more to produce. This is likely because retailers are using caged eggs as loss leaders and cage-free eggs for price discrimination. As cage-free eggs become the default, this should change.

 Transparency should also aid this progress. Although most companies are not reporting publicly on their progress in going cage-free, that’s changing. Following McDonald’s and Walmart’s recent reports (33% and 14% cage-free respectively), eight of the ten biggest egg buyers are now reporting in some form on their progress in going cage-free. Public reporting and progress in going cage-free are correlated, though causation likely flows both ways. 

  US companies with the most cage-free hens in their supply chain, based on their public reporting. The size of each bubble represents the number of cage-free hens in each company’s supply chain. Sources: estimates of hens in each company’s supply chain, and market share, compiled from USDA data and company reporting; % cage-free data are from the companies themselves, and are not verified: Costco, Walmart, Albertson’s, Kroger, Whole Foods Market, and McDonald’s. For calculating the number of hens affected by shell egg only progress, I assume 90% of eggs sold in retail are shell eggs.

 New state laws will speed this transition. Barring a court loss, Massachusetts’ Question Three and California’s Proposition 12 will require all eggs sold in both states to be cage-free by 2022. Washington and Oregon just passed similar measures, effective 2023. Assuming these states are already using about 20% cage-free eggs, their 58M residents will require another 46M more hens and pullets to be cage-free by 2024.

 What can we do? I think a few strategies are particularly promising for holding companies accountable to their pledges.

 First, we need to get retailers — which the USDA estimates account for 81% of all eggs covered by pledges — to decrease their sale of caged eggs. Although some big retailers like Costco are on track, most are not. Some are even trying to weasel out of their pledges; Publix warns that weak demand “may impact our ability to reach our stated goal” to go cage-free. We should call out this nonsense. Retailers pledged to go 100% cage-free, not to wait on individual consumers, who surveys show expect retailers to enforce welfare standards. And simple changes — like charging equal markups on caged and cage-free eggs — could make a big difference to sales. 

 Second, we need to get companies to publicly report on their progress in going cage-free. The eight biggest egg buyers that are publicly reporting collectively account for about 105M hens, or one in three US hens. But of the next 50 biggest egg buyers — which together account for another 70M hens — only nine are publicly reporting. CIWF USA’s EggTrack and HSUS’ new scorecard are critical tools to change that.

  What’s at stake: battery cages confine hens in tiny spaces for over a year on end without access to nests, perches, or other basic needs. Source: personal photo.

 Third, we need to get companies to set milestones toward going 100% cage-free. The egg industry is right that if buyers all wait until 2025 to go cage-free there won’t be enough eggs. Instead, companies need to set earlier dates by which a certain percentage of their eggs, or all eggs used by certain brands, will be cage-free. Ahold Delhaize (which owns Giant and Food Lion) is a good example: it pledges that four of its US retail chains will go 100% cage-free by the end of 2022, with the final two going cage-free by 2025.

 Fourth, we need to keep pressure on producers to transition sooner, and to better systems. New Zealand egg producers can’t keep up with rising demand for cage-free eggs they didn’t prepare for, while UK egg producers are now removing “enriched cages,” installed only a few years ago at a cost of £400M, because the market for caged eggs is collapsing. US egg producers risk making similar mistakes: some are delaying cage-free construction, while others are installing “combi systems,” which can swap between cage and cage-free. We can point out to these producers’ investors and lenders that cages and combi systems could both become “stranded assets,” worthless in a world where all big buyers only want cage-free eggs.

 Fifth, we need to campaign against companies that miss their deadlines. The Humane League has now done so with Marriott and Hilton, in each case securing new, much-expanded pledges on tighter timelines. The biggest foodservice companies — Aramark, Compass Group, Delaware North, and Sodexo — all have pledges that come due this year or next, and present obvious targets for enforcement campaigns if they’re not yet 100% cage-free. 

 Advocates need our help in this fight. If you can contribute time, you can join these campaigns through the Fast Action Network or Hen Hero Network. If you can contribute money, you can donate to to one of the groups leading this implementation work: The Humane League, Mercy for Animals, or CIWF USA.

 Sign up here to receive the farm animal welfare newsletter.

      Farm Animal Welfare     ‹ Previous Post   Next Post ›       Lewis Bollard's blog Add new comment     Comments   I wrote an article on this  Permalink Saulius Simcikas August 20, 2019 at 1:30 pm     I wrote an article on this topic that goes into more detail about some of the issues:https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/XdekdWJWkkhur9gvr/will-companies-meet-their-animal-welfare…

     reply    When are we going to get it  Permalink Wendy Jenks October 22, 2019 at 6:08 am     When are we going to get it through our thick skulls that welfare is NOT going to help animals? It never has, and it never will. Four hundred years of welfare measures in the U.S and we still see daily reports of the kicking, beating, stabbing, punching, neglecting, starving, burning, bludgeoning, and throat-slitting without stunning of farmed animals. 

 “Welfare” exists solely to make humans feel better about these abuses that are performed at their paid request, and is entirely counter-productive to the animal “rights” movement which seeks to end all of this unnecessary exploitation entirely. 

 We cannot dismantle systems of oppression while we are actively participating in it or supporting it. Speceisism is at the root of ALL harmful animal use. If we are not vegan and promoting a clear, consistent anti-speciesist vegan message, then WE are the problem, and these abuses will only continue as they have for hundreds of years.

     reply  Leave a comment  Your name *    E-mail *  Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *.   Homepage     Comment *Order     *   More information about text formats

 Text format  Filtered HTMLPlain text  Filtered HTMLSource Filter: Sources can be located in the 1st column (td) of a table with id sources. Source references should be enclosed in the @ character. Please note: source and source references strings are case sensetive and must match exactly.Use [fn]...[/fn] (or <fn>...</fn>) to insert automatically numbered footnotes.Use [toc ...] to insert a mediawiki style collapsible table of contents.Allowed HTML tags: <fn> <a> <em> <strong> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <br> <p> <div> <table> <tr> <td> <ht> <tbody> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <fn>Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.Lines and paragraphs break automatically.Typographic refinements will be added.Plain textNo HTML tags allowed.Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.Lines and paragraphs break automatically.   Weight for row 1  0          Notify me when new comments are posted     All comments     Replies to my comment    Leave this field blank                Stay Updated   Email me new blog posts

  Blog RSS feed

  More information     Recent blog posts        New Report on How Much Computational Power It Takes to Match the Human Brain    Modeling the Human Trajectory    Our Progress in 2019 and Plans for 2020    New Staff in Communications, Grants, Operations, Programs, and Research (2020)    Forecasting the COVID-19 Pandemic        Archives    All posts

   2020 September 2020    September 2020   June 2020    June 2020   May 2020    May 2020    May 2020   March 2020    March 2020  2019 December 2019    December 2019    December 2019   November 2019    November 2019   October 2019    October 2019   August 2019    August 2019    August 2019   July 2019    July 2019   June 2019    June 2019   April 2019    April 2019    April 2019    April 2019   March 2019    March 2019   February 2019    February 2019  2018 December 2018    December 2018    December 2018    December 2018   October 2018    October 2018   September 2018    September 2018   May 2018    May 2018   April 2018    April 2018   March 2018    March 2018    March 2018    March 2018   February 2018    February 2018    February 2018   January 2018    January 2018    January 2018    January 2018  2017 December 2017    December 2017    December 2017    December 2017   November 2017    November 2017   October 2017    October 2017   September 2017    September 2017    September 2017    September 2017    September 2017    September 2017   June 2017    June 2017    June 2017    June 2017    June 2017   April 2017    April 2017    April 2017   March 2017    March 2017    March 2017    March 2017   February 2017    February 2017    February 2017  2016 December 2016    December 2016    December 2016    December 2016   October 2016    October 2016   September 2016    September 2016    September 2016    September 2016    September 2016   July 2016    July 2016   June 2016    June 2016    June 2016   May 2016    May 2016    May 2016    May 2016   April 2016    April 2016    April 2016   March 2016    March 2016    March 2016   February 2016    February 2016    February 2016    February 2016    February 2016  2015 December 2015    December 2015   November 2015    November 2015   October 2015    October 2015   September 2015    September 2015    September 2015    September 2015    September 2015    September 2015   August 2015    August 2015    August 2015    August 2015   July 2015    July 2015    July 2015    July 2015    July 2015    July 2015   June 2015    June 2015    June 2015    June 2015   May 2015    May 2015    May 2015    May 2015   April 2015    April 2015    April 2015    April 2015    April 2015    April 2015   March 2015    March 2015    March 2015    March 2015    March 2015   February 2015    February 2015    February 2015    February 2015  2014 October 2014    October 2014    October 2014   September 2014    September 2014    September 2014   August 2014    August 2014   July 2014    July 2014    July 2014   June 2014    June 2014   May 2014    May 2014    May 2014    May 2014    May 2014   April 2014    April 2014    April 2014   March 2014    March 2014    March 2014   January 2014    January 2014    January 2014  2013 December 2013    December 2013   November 2013    November 2013    November 2013   October 2013    October 2013    October 2013    October 2013    October 2013   September 2013    September 2013   July 2013    July 2013    July 2013    July 2013   June 2013    June 2013    June 2013   May 2013    May 2013    May 2013   April 2013    April 2013    April 2013    April 2013   March 2013    March 2013   February 2013    February 2013  2012 September 2012    September 2012    September 2012   July 2012    July 2012   June 2012    June 2012    June 2012    June 2012   May 2012    May 2012    May 2012    May 2012   March 2012    March 2012   February 2012    February 2012    February 2012    February 2012   January 2012    January 2012  2011 October 2011    October 2011   September 2011    September 2011    September 2011    September 2011                 contact us jobs press kit    facebook twitter rss  © Open Philanthropy. Except as otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License. Some images may be copyrighted by others and not licensed for re-use: see image captions or footnotes. Privacy policy         try { clicky.init(100914494); }catch(e){}