Template talk:Chinese currency and coinage
WikiProject Numismatics | (Rated Template-class) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WikiProject China | (Rated Template-class) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Requested move[edit]
- The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Chinese currency and coinage โ Template:Mainland Chinese currency and coinage โ The template was named "Mainland Chinese currency and coinage". User:Secrecy has been trying to move it to "Chinese currency and coinage" (POV). The same thing has happened to the content of Renminbi, which has been discussed at Talk:Renminbi#Mainland or not?, which goes on to the next section on the same talk page. User:Secrecy was unable to make a coherent argument why the word "mainland" should be removed. ChoChoPK (็็PK) (talk | contrib) 21:22, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Survey[edit]
- Add # '''Support''' or # '''Oppose''' on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
Survey - in support of the move[edit]
Survey - in opposition to the move[edit]
- Oppose; most of this template deals with currencies before any division between Chinas. Make it cover all currencies within China, and what's the problem? As far I can see this amounts to: Remove the word era from the ROC, since it still exists, and add the New Taiwan dollar. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 14:09, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment That would be POV because the Pan Green Coalition would oppose that. Even though I personally prefer your solution. --ChoChoPK (็็PK) (talk | contrib) 15:16, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- If we agree, let's not tell them ;-> It may be impossible to be acceptable to everyone. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 17:16, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't necessarily think current Taiwanese currency should be included, but this template covers currencies well before the term "mainland" came into being. No opinion on whether to remove the term "era" as the template is organized historically and the ROC was a distinct "era". SchmuckyTheCat 02:15, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it to be moved. --Stemonitis 07:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Tibet, East-Turkestan, and Manchuria. ๐ฒ๐ป๐ณ๐ป๐ฒ๐ป[edit]
The reason I added these territories is because they both historically and currently for a part of China/Taiwan, during the Yuan dynasty the money of Tibet was regional money within the realm of the Great Khan, though Manchukuo was independent it did see itself as a continuation of the Qing dynasty, meanwhile many of the Tibetan and East-Turkestani coins were minted by the "Chinese"/"Taiwanese" government. It's not to get up in anyone's ire, nor is it a statement claiming that "Tibet, East-Turkestan, and Manchuria belong to China/Taiwan", it's simply organising non-Han currencies of modern China/Taiwan into the template. --1.55.181.2 (talk) 03:06, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Taiwan not China?[edit]
@AjaxSmack: could you please explain this edit? As Taiwan is currently a part of the Republic of China it is "Chinese" as "Chinese" doesn't necessarily only refer to Mainland China. --Donald Trung (talk) 16:34, 22 September 2018 (UTC)