Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy
232 × 100
AbbreviationITEP
MottoInforming the Debate Over Tax Policy Nationwide
Formation1980
TypePublic Policy Think Tank
Headquarters1616 P Street, NW Suite 200, Washington, DC 20036
Location
Revenue (2014)
$1,589,802[1]
Expenses (2014)$1,392,085[1]
Websitewww.itep.org/
Taxation
10 Percent Legacy and Succession Duty Impressed Duty Stamp.jpg
An aspect of fiscal policy

The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP) is a non-profit, non-partisan think tank that works on state and federal tax policy issues. ITEP was founded in 1980, and is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. ITEP describes its mission as striving to “keep policymakers and the public informed of the effects of current and proposed tax policies on tax fairness, government budgets and sound economic policy.”[2]

Publications[edit]

ITEP's flagship publication is its "Who Pays?" report.[3] The report was originally released in 1996, and has since been updated in 2003, 2009, 2013, 2015 and 2018. The 2018 report includes tax changes enacted through September 10, 2018, at 2015 income levels. "Who Pays?" analyzes the distribution, by income level, of state and local taxes in all 50 states, as well as in the District of Columbia. Its main finding is that: "the vast majority of state and local tax systems are fundamentally unfair. An overreliance on consumption taxes and the absence of a progressive personal income tax in many states neutralizes whatever benefits the working poor receive from refundable low-income tax credits." The majority of the data contained in this report is produced using the ITEP Microsimulation Tax Model.[4][5]

Other major reports released by ITEP include, "90 Reasons We Need State Corporate Tax Reform," which examines the effective state corporate income tax rates paid by large and profitable companies.[6]"Building a Better Gas Tax" measures the impact of construction cost inflation in preventing most state gasoline taxes from providing a sustainable source of transportation revenue.[7] "A Capital Idea" examines the revenue and fairness implications of state tax breaks for capital gains income, and "Writing Off Tax Giveaways" does the same for itemized deductions.[8][9] ITEP also reports on "Undocumented Immigrants' State and Local Tax Contribution" made by nearly 11 million undocumented immigrants residing currently in the United States.[10] Many of ITEP’s reports deal with issues or proposals that are relevant to only a single state – often focusing on proposed tax changes or reforms, for example, "The ITEP Guide to Fair State and Local Taxes."[11][12]

ITEP has released a series of reports criticizing studies by Arthur Laffer about the economic impact of lowering or eliminating state personal income taxes and estate taxes.[13]

Funders[edit]

ITEP lists a number of foundations among its funders, including the Annie E. Casey Foundation, the Ford Foundation, and the New York Community Trust.[14] ITEP also accepts individual donations.

Political stance[edit]

ITEP's quantitative analyses are utilized by observers from across the political spectrum and by analysts within government.[15][16] ITEP, as well as the associated Citizens for Tax Justice, has been characterized as liberal.[17][18][19]

The ITEP Microsimulation Tax Model[edit]

Many of ITEP's analyses rely on the ITEP Microsimulation Tax Model. The ITEP model is a computer program capable of estimating the revenue yield and distribution of federal, state, and local taxes, as well as proposed changes to those taxes.[5]

According to ITEP, its model "relies on one of the largest databases of tax returns and supplementary data in existence, encompassing close to three quarters of a million records."[5] Three similar microsimulation models are used by the Joint Committee on Taxation, the U.S. Treasury Department, and the Congressional Budget Office.[5] The ITEP model, however, stands apart from each of these in that it adds state-by-state estimating capabilities.[5] The Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center and the Tax Foundation have also built their own tax models.[20][21]

Tax haven research[edit]

See also: Tax havens § Tax haven lists

An ITEP report which attracts worldwide media attention is the Offshore Shell Games: The Use of Offshore Tax Havens by Fortune 500 Companies report.[22] ITEP jointly fund the report with the U.S. Public Interest Research Group ("PRIG"), Education Fund. The report adopts a purely quantitative approach and calculates the scale of involvement by leading U.S. multinationals with tax havens by conducting analysis on their SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings. The latest report was in 2017 and it ranks tax havens by two different type of quantitative calculations, based on 2012-2015 10-K and 10-Q filings:

  1. Quantum of subsidiaries or legal connections, disclosed by U.S. multinationals in tax havens;[23] and
  2. Quantum of financial profits disclosed by U.S. multinationals in tax havens.[23]

ITEP's ranking of tax havens matches with other academic rankings of tax havens, for example:

  1. Quantum of subsidiaries or legal connections: Research in July 2017 by the University of Amsterdam's CORPNET group, Conduit and Sink OFCs, which used legal connections, lists 5 major global Conduit OFCs, through which most corporate base erosion and profit shifting ("BEPS") flows are routed.[24] 4 of the 5 major Conduit OFCs appear in the top 6 tax havens of ITEP's ranking of tax havens by legal connections. CORPNET's 5th Conduit OFC, the United Kingdom, only transformed its tax code in 2009-2012, and therefore does not appear in ITEP's 2017 report (used 2015 data).
  2. Quantum of financial profits: Research in June 2018 by noted tax academic, Gabriel Zucman, and a team from the University of Berkley and University of Copenhagen ranked tax havens by the quantum of profits shifted, or BEPS flows.[25] 9 of the top ten tax havens from the Zucman-Tørsløv-Wier 2018 list appear in the top 10 tax havens of ITEP's ranking of tax havens by profits.

Note that the above two academic studies example global corporate activity, and not just Fortune 500 Companies. However, as noted in the academic literature, most corporate tax avoidance and BEPS strategies are executed by U.S. multinationals ("MNCs"), and the BEPS strategies used by all global MNCs have similarities, thus using similar havens.[26]

ITEP 2017 tax haven list (by quantum of connections)[edit]

The ten largest tax havens from the ITEP 2017 report, ranked by the percentage of Fortune 500 Companies with subsidiaries in the tax haven:[23]

  1. Netherlands*†
  2. Singapore*†
  3. Hong Kong*‡
  4. Luxembourg*‡
  5. Switzerland*†
  6. Ireland*†
  7. Bermuda*‡
  8. Cayman Islands*
  9. Mauritius
  10. PanamaΔ

(*) Identified as one of the largest 10 corporate tax havens by Gabriel Zucman in 2018 (Cayman and the British Virgin Islands appear as Caribbean).[25]
(†) Identified as one of the largest 5 Conduits by CORPNET in 2017.
(‡) Identified as one of the largest 5 Sinks by CORPNET in 2017.
(Δ) Identified on the first OECD 2000 list of 35 tax havens (the OECD list only contained Trinidad & Tobago by 2017).[27]

ITEP 2017 tax haven list (by quantum of profits)[edit]

The ten largest tax havens from the ITEP 2017 report, ranked by the profits booked by Fortune 500 Companies in the tax haven:[23]

  1. Netherlands*†
  2. Ireland*†
  3. Bermuda*‡
  4. Luxembourg*‡
  5. Cayman Islands*
  6. Switzerland*†
  7. Singapore*†
  8. BahamasΔ
  9. Hong Kong*‡
  10. British Virgin Islands*‡Δ

(*) Identified as one of the largest 10 corporate tax havens by Gabriel Zucman in 2018 (Cayman and the British Virgin Islands appear as Caribbean).[25]
(†) Identified as one of the largest 5 Conduits by CORPNET in 2017.
(‡) Identified as one of the largest 5 Sinks by CORPNET in 2017.
(Δ) Identified on the first OECD 2000 list of 35 tax havens (the OECD list only contained Trinidad & Tobago by 2017).[27]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b "Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy" (PDF). Foundation Center. Retrieved 25 April 2017.
  2. ^ "Mission & History". ITEP. 2010.
  3. ^ "Who Pays". ITEP. 2015.
  4. ^ "ITEP Microsimulation Tax Model Overview". ITEP.
  5. ^ a b c d e "ITEP Microsimulation Tax Model". ITEP. 2010.
  6. ^ "Corporate Tax Dodging in the States". ITEP. 2014.
  7. ^ "Building a Better Gas Tax". ITEP. 2011.
  8. ^ "A Capital Idea". ITEP. 2011.
  9. ^ "Writing Off Tax Giveaways". ITEP. 2010.
  10. ^ Undocumented Immigrants' State and Local Tax Contributions. Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy. Released February 24th, 2016.
  11. ^ The ITEP Guide to Fair State and Local Taxes. Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.
  12. ^ "Archive". ITEP.
  13. ^ "Debunking Laffer". ITEP. 2012.
  14. ^ "ITEP Funding". ITEP. 2010.
  15. ^ "How Much Did the Bush Tax Cuts Cost in Forgone Revenue?". Tax Foundation. 2010.
  16. ^ "2011 Minnesota Tax Incidence Study" (PDF). Minnesota Department of Revenue. 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 March 2011.
  17. ^ "Immigration Overhaul Could Bring States, Localities $2 Billion a Year". Pew Charitable Trusts. July 10, 2013. Retrieved September 3, 2014.
  18. ^ "I Don't Hate Wal-Mart, but I Don't Mind Taxing It". State Tax Notes. Tax Analysts. July 31, 2006.
  19. ^ Coombes, Andrea (April 15, 2012). "Taxes—Who Really Is Paying Up". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved September 3, 2014.
  20. ^ "Overview of the Tax Policy Center Microsimulation Model". Tax Policy Center. 2008.
  21. ^ "The Tax Foundation Small Comparative Statics Model of the U.S. Economy". Retrieved September 3, 2014.
  22. ^ "Offshore Shell Games". Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy. 17 October 2017.[self-published source]
  23. ^ a b c d Richard Phillips; Matt Gardner; Alexandria Robins; Michelle Surka (2017). "Offshore Shell Games 2017" (PDF). Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy. Amount of Tax Haven Connections (Figure 1, Page 11), Amount of Tax Haven Profits (Figure 4, Page 16)
  24. ^ Javier Garcia-Bernardo; Jan Fichtner; Frank W. Takes; Eelke M. Heemskerk (24 July 2017). "Uncovering Offshore Financial Centers: Conduits and Sinks in the Global Corporate Ownership Network". Scientific Reports. 7 (6246).
  25. ^ a b c Gabriel Zucman; Thomas Tørsløv; Ludvig Wier (8 June 2018). "The Missing Profits of Nations" (PDF). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  26. ^ Dhammika Dharmapala (2014). "What Do We Know About Base Erosion and Profit Shifting? A Review of the Empirical Literature". University of Chicago.
  27. ^ a b "Towards Global Tax Co-operation" (PDF). OECD. April 2000. p. 17. TAX HAVENS: 1.Andorra 2.Anguilla 3.Antigua and Barbuda 4.Aruba 5.Bahamas 6.Bahrain 7.Barbados 8.Belize 9.British Virgin Islands 10.Cook Islands 11.Dominica 12.Gibraltar 13.Grenada 14.Guernsey 15.Isle of Man 16.Jersey 17.Liberia 18.Liechtenstein 19.Maldives 20.Marshall Islands 21.Monaco 22.Montserrat 23.Nauru 24.Net Antilles 25.Niue 26.Panama 27.Samoa 28.Seychelles 29.St. Lucia 30.St. Kitts & Nevis 31.St. Vincent and the Grenadines 32.Tonga 33.Turks & Caicos 34.U.S. Virgin Islands 35.Vanuatu

External links[edit]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Institute_on_Taxation_and_Economic_Policy&oldid=917186652"