Talk:Lily and Jim

Factuality/NPOV

Yeah... some of this really needs sources, such as the parts about this or that being unpleasant of the little trivia things. Plus, some of the statements show a POV, albeit not a controversial one. For example, "Brian"'s job may have been very pleasant; without an interview source, it's a point of view to say it wasn't. This sounds more like a human interest article than an encyclopedia entry. Someone should pretty much rewrite it. if no one does, I can do it myself, but I know very little about the film, so it won't be great. 70.171.59.231 06:57, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Lilyjim-320.jpg

Image:Lilyjim-320.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:22, 13 February 2008 (UTC)