Skip to navigationSkip to contentSkip to footerHelp using this website - Accessibility statement
  • Advertisement

    How the Rich List is dodging real-life Succession dramas

    As some of its icons are farewelled, a new generation is taking the reins. So far, the business landscape has remained relatively stoush-free. From the upcoming Rich List issue out on May 31.

    James ThomsonColumnist

    Subscribe to gift this article

    Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

    Subscribe now

    Already a subscriber?

    It’s the billionaire version of four funerals and a wedding.
    In the past 12 months, the Financial Review Rich List has farewelled four of its most iconic figures: Sydney property icon Lang Walker, veteran rag trader Marc Besen, car dealing legend Laurie Sutton and agribusiness giant John Kahlbetzer. Then in March, media magnate Rupert Murdoch, 93 – who has two children on this year’s list – announced he would marry his girlfriend, Elena Zhukova, 67.

    On the surface, all of these events have the potential for succession drama: bitter fights over control of business empires, siblings going their separate ways, old wounds resurfacing as new partners are cut in.

    But remarkably – and perhaps a little sadly for those who take comfort from knowing rich families have problems like the rest of us – these life events have caused barely a ripple in the family fortunes. Indeed, with the exception of Gina Rinehart’s epic and ongoing family feud and the Murdoch brothers’ long-running power struggle (Lachlan won), Australia’s business landscape has remained relatively free of succession stoushes.

    There are many different structures in place. In some instances, power is shared and then transferred over time. Sam Bennett

    So how have most of our richest managed to avoid the fate of the Roy family in the hit TV drama Succession? Good planning has been key.

    It is 30 years since the Rich 200 edition (previously published by the now defunct BRW magazine) contained one of the first pieces foreshadowing the looming transfer of wealth to the next generation; in 1994 it said the “corporate landscape has taken on a greyer hue” as 107 members of the Rich List made it past 60 years of age.

    More than 20 years ago, your columnist penned a similar piece, noting the 10 richest were over 65. Invariably, such stories pointed to a string of studies – which hold true today – showing the percentage of family businesses that make it to the second generation has remained stubbornly low at around 30 per cent. The rich have heeded these warnings and, in the majority of cases, put in place clear, practical succession plans.

    A key part of these plans is usually bringing in outside help, either from independent board members, trusted external advisers or non-family executives. Lang Walker’s empire will remain under family control, for example, but will be run by senior executives who Walker handed day-to-day control to last year, as part of a carefully developed succession process.

    Beyond this, there are many different structures in place. In some instances, power is shared and then transferred over time; a good example is Michael Heine and his son, Matt, at listed investment platform business Netwealth, who worked as co-CEOs before Matt took over sole responsibility and Michael became a director.

    In other businesses, there is a clear delineation between siblings. Johnny and Markus Kahlbetzer, respectively, run the family’s agribusiness and venture capital businesses of the empire left following the death of father John last year, while the children of pub baron Arthur Laundy all have different roles in his business.

    Advertisement

    There’s no doubt that behind closed doors, many of these family relationships would be tense, even fraught at times. Laundy’s son, Stuart, admitted last year he often clashes with his father. “It’s either Dad’s way or the highway,” he says.

    But in public, most family empires are holding together. Indeed, it’s notable that no less than 50 Rich Listers now appear as “. . . and family” listings, in recognition that fortunes often outgrow founders.

    How have most of our richest managed to avoid the fate of the Roy family in the hit TV drama Succession? Good planning has been key. 

    So perhaps it’s not the next wave of succession we need to worry about, but the one after that. A report from global property consultant Knight Frank this year estimated Millennials stand to inherit a staggering $US90 trillion ($136 trillion) in assets in a wealth transfer that will make them the richest generation in history.

    A prominent example of this shift is under way at LVMH, the luxury brand giant controlled by Europe’s richest man, Bernard Arnault. This year, he put sons Alexandre, 31, and Frédéric, 29, on the board alongside their older siblings Delphine, 48, and Antoine, 46. Bernard’s youngest child Jean, who is 25, is widely expected to eventually join the family firm, too.

    A very public and potentially juicy succession battle looms as Bernard takes his pick of five potential successors. And perhaps within as little as five years – when Bernard is 80 – we may see the first major Millennial scion emerge.

    The Rich List issue of AFR Magazine is out on Friday, May 31 inside The Australian Financial Review. Follow AFR Mag on Instagram.

    Subscribe to gift this article

    Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

    Subscribe now

    Already a subscriber?

    Read More

    James Thomson
    James ThomsonColumnistJames Thomson is senior Chanticleer columnist based in Melbourne. He was the Companies editor and editor of BRW Magazine. Connect with James on Twitter. Email James at j.thomson@afr.com

    Latest In People

    Fetching latest articles