Anglo rejects BHP’s $74 billion third offer, but leaves door open for deal
By Simon Johanson
BHP has gained a one-week extension to come up with a binding takeover offer for Anglo American after its rival rejected a third and final proposal from the world’s biggest listed miner that values the group at $74 billion.
BHP’s latest bid prompted Anglo American to say it would engage with the mining giant, which has now made three unsuccessful offers in a month for Anglo.
“The board is willing to continue to engage with BHP and its advisers on this topic and has therefore requested a one-week extension to the PUSU [put up or shut up] deadline which has been consented to by the [UK Takeovers] Panel,” chairman Stuart Chambers said.
Anglo itself has outlined a plan to divest its less profitable coal, nickel, diamond and platinum businesses to counter BHP’s bid.
The structure of any deal and the fate of Anglo’s businesses in South Africa remain big obstacles, with Chambers highlighting concerns about completion and execution risks in BHP’s proposal.
“The conclusion here appears to be clear – this new proposal was rejected by Anglo on grounds of structure rather than price,” said Mark Kelly at MKP Advisors.
The mining giant has stalked London-listed Anglo over the past four weeks after making an initial unsolicited $60 billion offer in April, which Anglo’s board swiftly rejected.
The global resource company’s unwelcome attention prompted Anglo to bring forward plans for a radical downsizing in which it will offload key coal, platinum and diamond projects – a defensive move unveiled to counter BHP’s second offer, which valued its target at $64.4 billion.
BHP is now proposing to swap each Anglo share for 0.8860 of its shares.
The new offer is still conditional on Anglo unbundling its platinum and iron ore assets in South Africa, where it was founded and still has deep roots.
Anglo said that process could take about 18 months, by which time it expects its own restructuring to be completed.
“[The proposal] consequently has the potential for material value leakage to be disproportionately suffered by Anglo American’s shareholders,” Chambers said.
BHP said the ratio of shares it is offering Anglo shareholders is final, unless there is an offer from a third party, or if the Anglo board is “minded to recommend an offer on better terms”.
Kelly at MKP Advisors said: “Despite the use of the word ‘final’, there would appear to be scope for BHP to increase the value of their offer.”
The South African government has been paying close attention to BHP’s proposed Anglo deal. The new deadline of May 29 is the date of the national election there.
Anglo employs more than 40,000 people in South Africa, where mining companies have been cutting jobs and investment, as platinum especially falls out of favour.
South Africa’s Public Investment Corporation had said earlier that BHP should consider revising its initial proposal.
“A meaningful revision of the current BHP proposal ... should take into consideration the material risks that current shareholders of both Anglo and its subsidiaries would have to assume over an extended timeframe,” said Abel Sithole, chief executive of PIC, Anglo’s second-largest shareholder.
Analysts at JP Morgan last week said BHP would need to boost its offer by around 30 per cent to reflect fair value for Anglo and its prized copper assets in Chile and Peru.
Developments such as artificial intelligence and automation, and the energy transition including electric vehicles and renewable energy, have driven up demand prospects for copper cable used to conduct electricity.
With Reuters
The Market Recap newsletter is a wrap of the day’s trading. Get it each weekday afternoon.