ugly-anarchist:
The progression from “I don’t think afab people can be transfem” to “I don’t think intersex people can be trans” is absolutely fascinating to watch unfold
Alternatively, it can also go from “I don’t think afab people can be transfem” to “Intersex people existing is an inherent threat to trans people” which is scary to watch unfold
Like the amount of shit I’ve gotten about me “sounding like conservative propaganda” because I’ve talked about my experiences with being coersively reassigned male and being put on hormones. Or me having a complicated relationship with my sex and gender being used to call me a T*RF.
If you’re wondering, the progression of logic that I’ve personally witnessed is:
Intersexists: “Afab people can’t be transfem and amab people can’t be transmasc because you can’t transition to a gender you are socially recognized as”
Intersex people: “Actually intersex people sometimes aren’t socially recognized as their agab or are reassigned a different sex later in life, meaning they have to socially transition to the gender they identify as, even if it aligns with their agab”
Intersexists: “That isn’t what trans is, trans means you transition from your agab to a different gender. Not being recognized by society as the gender you identify as isn’t what trans is.”
Intersex people: “This leaves out the nuances of how intersex people experience both sex and gender. Intersex people can’t categorize our gender and labels the same way perisex trans people do because of this nuance.”
Intersexists: “Then intersex people shouldn’t use the label trans.”
Essentially, this stems from the prioritization of the perisex trans experience. The perisex trans experience and perisex voices are seen as The Truth and intersex people are seen as perverting the meaning behind the words that perisex trans people have made. But what this leaves out is that there have always been intersex people in the trans community. We’ve always been here and all you’re doing is implying that “trans” and “intersex” are two mutually exclusive labels.
The argument that transness is based on agab is inherently intersexist and prioritizes perisex trans people, it is intersex erasure.
I think this logic also stems from the idea that afab/amab intersex people are simply “females/males who aren’t considered female/male” but a lot of intersex people don’t consider their physical sex to align with either female or male.
Like, yeah intersex isn’t a 3rd sex but we aren’t just “females and males with intersex variations” either. It’s a lot more complicated than that and, again, there’s a lot of nuance that varies from person to person.
If an intersex person does not consider their “natural physical sex” (for lack of better wording) to be female/male but they want to transition to a body that is female/male because of dysphoria then why shouldn’t they be accepted under the trans label? Doesn’t this align with the experiences of other altersex and transsexual people?
“Afab” doesn’t mean “physically female”, same with amab. People need to stop using these labels as a more progressive way to talk about what someone’s “biological sex” is.