×

This post is locked. You won't be able to comment.

top 200 commentsshow 500

[–]Will_OzellmanMIN - NHL 3194 points3195 points  (12 children)

A post-mortem examination confirmed Johnson died as a result of a fatal neck injury, South Yorkshire Police said.

Thanks, Detective.

[–]DeepTrout101TOR - NHL 161 points162 points  (0 children)

Sherlock Holmes is on the case!

[–]97jumboHC Davos - NL 136 points137 points  (0 children)

A lot of the same weirdos from outside the hockey sphere who were calling this intentional were also claiming that they ruled it a Covid Death, to try to attach it to their other talking points, so them confirming this is somehow important. Truly stupid times

[–]EricPostpischil 62 points63 points  (0 children)

The police were not reporting why Johnson died. They were reporting what the record showed. And that is a different thing. There is a meaningful difference between “Johnson died as a result of a fatal neck injury” and “The official record shows that Johnson died as a result of a fatal neck injury.”

You know from media reporting, maybe even seeing video, why Johnson died. You do not want trials in court and official records to be settled that way. You do not want a prosecutor to be able to ask a court to put somebody in jail for years because they heard it somewhere or because they have a video every bit as good as a fictional movie production.

The police and prosecutors need to establish an official record. They need records of witness statements and sworn testimony. They need somebody to testify they recorded the video and it is correct and unaltered. They need a medical examiner to state the results for the record. And when a reporter asks a police spokesperson what the record says, the spokesperson should tell them.

Documenting what happened is important.

[–]FirebitezANA - NHL 1327 points1328 points  (52 children)

How long until we get the locked award?

[–]Dont_Be_A_Dick_OKBOS - NHL 670 points671 points  (34 children)

So far it looks like it’s just hockey people here so it’s not bad, but if the folks from the home page get here it won’t take long.

[–]GhostSharkSJS - NHL 600 points601 points  (24 children)

Sooo many bad takes on the r/news thread about this. A bunch of armchair experts on physics and hockey spouting nonsense. Makes me sad, poor Petgrave must feel just awful about this already. Can’t imagine he doesn’t have PTSD

[–]ashaggydogtaleSEA - NHL 558 points559 points  (6 children)

I think the worst were the people claiming to know hockey. Multiple posters saying shit like "I play/ref in a beer league, and I can definitely control my blades at all time..." and so on.

For fuck's sake, if you think that, there's a reason you're stuck in a fucking beer league.

[–]TheSaucyGoonBOS - NHL 588 points589 points  (0 children)

“I’ve never spun out of control driving my Toyota Corolla. I don’t get how formula 1 drives lose control and crash all the time”

[–]Neat__GuyTOR - NHL 108 points109 points  (0 children)

While ignoring multiple clips of pro having skates come up and clip guys in the face

[–]jlt6666SJS - NHL 77 points78 points  (0 children)

This reminds me of the time Tony Stewart ran over a guy at a track. The guy had left his car and walked close to Tony's path. These where midget cars on a dirt track with not the greatest lighting ever.

Tony revs the engine right before hitting the guy. Tons of idiots claimed it was him swerving at him. However that's how you control those cars you literally spend the whole race turning left with your wheels turned to the right. It's a constant drift essentially.

[–]GhostSharkSJS - NHL 134 points135 points  (2 children)

“Well it never happened to me so it’s impossible it was an accident”

Same people who probably deny global warming cause they were a little chilly this morning. Absolute dumbasses.

[–]Grambles89VAN - NHL 31 points32 points  (0 children)

People need to accept it was a freak accident that ALWAYS has potential to happen in any hockey game.

[–]FalseWeekndBOS - NHL 93 points94 points  (2 children)

Don't you love it when everyone is a armchair expert in something they saw 5 minutes ago?

[–]lookalive07DET - NHL 244 points245 points  (0 children)

No. I don't.

I know you're joking, but I'm absolutely sick and fucking tired of this knee-jerk reactionary society we've enabled with social media. Everyone with even a single brain cell is allowed a platform to spew nonsense and it's getting old.

[–]anomandaris81TOR - NHL 48 points49 points  (0 children)

I had a prof in uni who penned an article about this called Minute Rice Experts

[–]LanthemandragoranNJD - NHL 101 points102 points  (6 children)

Jesus christ I just looked in there and I'm actually mad for the first time ever that a thread is locked and I can't refute what certain people are saying.

Sooo many people that know nothing of hockey watching a clip and deciding it's flat out murder. I've no need to watch that man die again so I'm not watching whatever video they are using but I assume its slow motion. Many things in hockey (and all contact sports) look intentional in slow motion. It so very rarely is.

This shit is disgusting. Petgrave is going to be fucked up for the rest of his life. He didn't do that purposely.

Edit - u/ThatOnlyCountsAsOne - I said I've already seen it. I said I'm not watching it again. Learn to read, it's embarrassing.

Edit 2 - u/ThatOnlyCountsAsOne

Yep, still embarrassing that you can't read.

Edit 3 - u/ThatOnlyCountsAsOne

You mean kinda like what you're doing right?

[–]LadyGisCompromisedMTL - NHL 74 points75 points  (3 children)

They’re not armchair experts. They are trolls who are literally being paid to promote propaganda to drive a wedge into our society.

When the incident happened, the majority of comments on several subreddits all came from India reddit accounts.

People need to wake the fuck yo that western democracies are being attacked daily by foreign actors, and this horrible tragedy is being used in this war.

Edit: you know you’re right when the sad trolls spam you with suicide and harm prevention reports. Thanks losers!!

[–]YummyArtichokeSJS - NHL 38 points39 points  (0 children)

News locked it so expect people to migrate to a sub that they can comment in.

[–]blackb0xesTOR - NHL 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Well, they're here now.

[–]DionBlaster123Chicago Wolves - AHL 13 points14 points  (0 children)

there was definitely no shortage of, "I played hockey and this is suspicious" folks in r/hockey too

[–]DOELCMNILOCTOR - NHL 86 points87 points  (2 children)

Just waiting for the people who call it Ice Hockey to show up, then we know we're doomed

[–]drowsylacunaBOS - NHL 34 points35 points  (1 child)

All the EIHL fans probably do.

[–]toledosurprisedNYI - NHL 20 points21 points  (0 children)

wish we could limit threads like this to users with flairs or whatever to avoid getting brigaded

[–]PurplebuzzTOR - NHL 17 points18 points  (2 children)

I suppose it depends on how many people choose to post things not discussing the actual article?

[–]TCBlooDAL - NHL 45 points46 points  (1 child)

I'll start. You have a weirdly shaped ass.

[–]kralbenMIN - NHL 1228 points1229 points  (12 children)

It is probably already too late, but I am begging people to not think of this as the US Justice system. The UK system is fundamentally different and spouting off your uninformed legal takes isn't gonna help.

[–]jhruns1993STL - NHL 682 points683 points  (0 children)

I only specialize in bird law anyway

[–]SNIPES0009PIT - NHL 64 points65 points  (0 children)

Oh it's definitely too late. And even if it isn't, people will be too ignorant and stupid to follow that logic anyway. In fact, I saw a comment already about how if someone punches someone and they die it's manslaughter so why isn't this? Clearly not taking into consideration its a sport and they made an apples to oranges comparison. It's wild.

[–]Minimum_Possibility6Newcastle Vipers - EIHL 1328 points1329 points  (51 children)

This might not be Petgrave but the Health and safety officer for the arena, or whoever was responsible for having the correct medical provision on site.

Although it probably is petgrave

[–]babypointblankTOR - NHL 742 points743 points  (27 children)

Even if that’s the case…I don’t see how you would get a manslaughter case from failure to provide timely emergency care in that situation.

[–]Minimum_Possibility6Newcastle Vipers - EIHL 468 points469 points  (11 children)

It wouldn’t be about the speed that’s almost irrelevant, it’s whether there was adequate and reasonable provision in place

[–]new_nimmerzzCOL - NHL 437 points438 points  (5 children)

Some kind of negligence where they overlooked having basic medical services to save money or something.

[–]Minimum_Possibility6Newcastle Vipers - EIHL 170 points171 points  (3 children)

Essentially yes

[–]InternationalBrick76 38 points39 points  (2 children)

That’s happened before and it hasn’t resulted in manslaughter charges.

[–]Minimum_Possibility6Newcastle Vipers - EIHL 67 points68 points  (0 children)

Has with the Isle of Man TT race in 2007 - no charges stuck but arrests were made after the death of a steward and spectator

[–]MeverseyouBOS - NHL 246 points247 points  (11 children)

I'm a paramedic. I wouldn't be able to save anyone if that happened unless there was a vascular team on standby and blood ready for infusion. MAYBE would have a chance if this rink was maybe adjacent to a trauma center

[–]babypointblankTOR - NHL 310 points311 points  (10 children)

Malarchuck was promptly treated because the head trainer had been a combat medic in Vietnam and had stopped instantaneous massive bleeds before. Probably the only reason why he’s still alive.

[–]ZebZPHI - NHL 192 points193 points  (5 children)

Plus wasn't he immediately aided by 2 spectators who happened to be trauma nurses or something like that? I remember that it was basically a confluence of best case scenarios that resulted in him surviving.

[–]Dr_Brain_TOR - NHL 92 points93 points  (0 children)

Also the injury itself was different. Malarchuk severed jugular vein, in this case everything I’ve heard says that his carotid artery was cut. Much worse prognosis

[–]NopeNotUmaThurmanCHI - NHL 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Also, Malarchuck got off the ice and to transport much faster because he was playing on the end of the ice where the Zamboni doors were.

[–]Dr_Brain_TOR - NHL 34 points35 points  (0 children)

I agree- the injury suffered just isn’t survivable. Even if the exact same thing occurred on an operating room table with surgeons ready to go- would have still been iffy. As morbid as it is to think about he was dead by the time he got off the ice

[–]LeGoldieCHI - NHL 11 points12 points  (0 children)

People in positions of responsibility here in the UK can be charged with manslaughter if the death is proven to be due to negligence somehow

[–]Dont_Be_A_Dick_OKBOS - NHL 32 points33 points  (0 children)

If this is what’s happening, it wouldn’t be the people providing care, but instead it would be a situation where someone from the building/team didn’t have proper medical care present or something like that. Although there hasn’t been any claims about this, and the fact they specified someone was arrested on suspicion of manslaughter, it’s likely Petgrave. Hopefully just a formality.

[–]goldfish_11BOS - NHL 138 points139 points  (9 children)

I found it rather odd that no name was mentioned. Not sure if that’s standard in the UK but the name of the arrested person would be in the headline in USA.

[–]Minimum_Possibility6Newcastle Vipers - EIHL 264 points265 points  (0 children)

UK laws. No one has been charged yet, it’s not uncommon

[–]tommypopzWSH - NHL 90 points91 points  (4 children)

Absolutely the standard over here. Idk if it’s related to that but UK libel laws are scary lmao

[–]loewe67FLA - NHL 41 points42 points  (0 children)

Pretty standard. Overall, I think it's better to keep things anonymous and prevents people from assuming guilt, but with high profile individuals, everyone becomes a detective. Whenever a footballer gets arrested, people pick through the few details given to try and figure out who it is.

[–]PurplebuzzTOR - NHL 392 points393 points  (0 children)

It’s amazing how many experts on the English legal system we have on r/hockey.

[–]SemaaajTOR - NHL 179 points180 points  (10 children)

Okay - so I'll ask the question.

Preface: I've played hockey for 20+ years. I don't think he meant to kick him in the neck or significantly injure him. I've discussed this with a ton of hockey people.

I watch the video, and the only way I can see someone's leg truly swinging the way it did is if you catch an edge on your plant foot, which it didn't appear to me like thay happened. There is definitely a chance it was truly some sort of weird movement situation, but to me it seemed incredibly unnatural.

I wondered if he made an attempt to stick his leg out and interfere with Johnson's skating path. Not dissimilar to a knee-on-knee when missing a check (sometimes intentional and sometimes not). I've thought about it and it's the only thing that makes sense to me.

Is there a chance he is being charged because it is viewed as a completely reckless play (with an outcome no one could have imagined) and the intent it to plead it down but to have some sort of negligence charge stick?

Again, not saving this outcome was intentional. Not saying he deserves a manslaughter charge (he does not). If I am correct, he likely thought 2 minutes in the box would be the worst outcome, which I think 99.9% of people in that moment would expect the same.

[–]Perskarva 128 points129 points  (0 children)

I said this before, but i have not seen anyone else to point out that Adam Johnson teammate (no idea about his name) did stick lift Petgraves nearly the exact same time when Petgraves was going for a hit directed towards Johnson.

If you lift your hand during stick lift it will create "bowl" near your chest with elbow being the "lock" and that's where Petgraves elbow hit first with speed, and after that hit his both skates collide with Johnson teammates right skate.

I am 99% sure that was just a freak accident.

[–]MaartjeB99TOR - NHL 1067 points1068 points  (68 children)

I really hope this is just so the police can say they've gone through the formal process and can clear his name... then maybe he can do smth (cease and desist, or slander laws) about all the vile accusations being made against him. I'm not familiar with the uk legal system but I really hope it's just a formality

[–]Venaixis94CAR - NHL 430 points431 points  (29 children)

That’s what an investigation is for. If they’re arresting him, they believe that there’s some ground for a punishment

[–]mrmacdougallNSH - NHL 130 points131 points  (12 children)

That is how I am familiar with it in the states, but is it different in the UK?

[–]kylieighTBL - NHL 282 points283 points  (9 children)

This is what I found

Because it’s a lot easier to arrest someone in the United Kingdom, but being arrested there isn’t a big deal like it is in the United States. American police need probable cause to make an arrest, but in the United Kingdom, officers can arrest on suspicion. Probable cause is defined as the belief that a crime was probably committed, and that the suspect was probably responsible. Reasonable suspicion means that a right-minded individual would have grounds to suspect that a crime had been committed and that the suspect might be responsible. To have probable cause, greater evidence is required.

Being arrested on suspicion in the U.K. isn’t so unpleasant as being arrested in the U.S. In fact, you’re likely to be released within hours without paying any bail.

Via https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2012/03/rebekah-brooks-arrested-how-is-being-arrested-different-in-britain.html

[–]dannygloversghostPIT - NHL 29 points30 points  (1 child)

They did say that he was “still in custody,” though, right? In fairness I don’t know how much time has passed since the arrest.

[–]ampmzCOL - NHL 54 points55 points  (0 children)

Not a US CJS expert but I’ve worked within the UK CJS. Here we arrest in order to trigger certain powers, such as the power to search and keep someone in order to question. A a positive charging decision indicates they (the CPS) believe there is a reasonable charge of conviction.

[–]Minimum_Possibility6Newcastle Vipers - EIHL 47 points48 points  (2 children)

The police don’t make charges in the UK, it’s the CPS, police can arrest but it doesn’t mean a charge will be made.

[–]FantasticJacket7ANA - NHL 31 points32 points  (0 children)

The police don't press charges on the US either.

[–]47UpVAN - NHL 67 points68 points  (9 children)

That's not how it works in the U.K, they can't ask you for an interview without placing you under arrest.

[–]Minimum_Possibility6Newcastle Vipers - EIHL 22 points23 points  (0 children)

They can, but if you refuse you can be arrested

[–]jarretwithonet 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Not necessarily "ground for a punishment". It's the the police, or crown, deem that it meets the criteria that a crime was committed.

The UK has no minimum sentencing guidelines for manslaughter, so even if found guilty, there's still not an indication that he would serve time.

[–]Spcone23Peoria Rivermen - AHL 18 points19 points  (1 child)

They article has the Investigatin department asking the public not to make accusations or slander anyone.

[–]creamsauces 350 points351 points  (1 child)

I know nobody’s gonna read this and honestly that’s probably for the best. But I don’t have hockey fan friends in real life so I’m gonna weigh in for no reason other than to get it out into the void because it seems to be such an unpopular opinion here and I feel weird about that.

I am a defense attorney. I spend basically every day of my life with people who have been charged with crimes, many of them who are guilty. Every thread I’ve seen on Reddit that is any way related to criminal action is riddled with misunderstandings and people confidently espousing things they can’t reasonably have a real opinion on.

Because of my job I have a lot of empathy for people that have made mistakes. Nearly all of them are aware that they made a bad decision in a given situation. “Intent” is a tricky legal concept because intending to do something doesn’t mean you intend the outcome and things very easily become conflated. Their lives are forever changed for something that they never “intended”.

I say all this because against my better judgment I watched the video, and despite like many of you growing up playing hockey since age 4 and being familiar with all manners of slips and trips, I can’t honestly conclude that I don’t see an intentional kick. I gasped when I first saw it after reading all the discourse here. It’s a crappy video that looks like a purposeful kick to me.

I don’t write this because I’m happy he’s been arrested, and I would never presume or assume he intended the outcome. I’ve had clients that intentionally started a fight, or even just ran a red light, which then led to horrifying consequences. I don’t want nor do I guess this would lead to an eventual conviction. But the discourse here about it being clearly this or obviously that is maddening.

I don’t practice in the UK and I won’t pretend to be able to apply all of my background to it 1 to 1. But in the US, I would be floored if that video did not lead to an arrest. That’s without including any of the likely interviews they’ve conducted with teammates. If it’s exculpatory great. if not…well things could get a lot worse.

I’m not saying he’s guilty. I’m not even saying he deserves punitive measures. I’m probably a dream juror for a defense attorney akin to Dave Chappelle in the Michael Jackson trial skit. What I am saying is that the people here or on Twitter that confidently think they know what did happen or what is going to happen (or worse, are spreading racist conspiracy theories) are wishcasting at best. Don’t go looking for morality in legal outcomes. Being found not guilty or charges not being brought does not mean that you’re innocent, and being found guilty doesn’t mean you’re a bad person. There will be no satisfying outcome to this ugly incident.

[–]friedballbag 48 points49 points  (0 children)

Very well put. I’ve seen the video and in my opinion I don’t think he intentionally tried to kill Adam, but he does look like he went to do him.

Involuntary manslaughter.

[–]TracktoyVAN - NHL 475 points476 points  (29 children)

Im going to get downvoted for this, whatever.

I have been involved in a coroners inquest, including a sporting death, motorcycle racing in the UK. My statement reflected my belief that the rider in question acted recklessly and it led to another riders death, and another's life changing injury. I didn't believe it was intentional. The rider was not charged/arrested nor did he have his name associated with the word manslaughter. It was classified as misadventure.

For this player to be arrested ...I have to believe multiple people testified to the fact that it seemed a bit odd, and that the player made a decision which led to this outcome.

I could be wrong, I hope I am wrong.

[–]dannygloversghostPIT - NHL 74 points75 points  (0 children)

I’m not going to disagree with anything you said, only add the important note that, as far as we know, he has not been charged, only arrested. Other folks in this thread who know the UK legal system better than I do have noted that an arrest in the UK is not quite as “serious” or meaningful as it is in the US (wrt the arresting authority’s confidence that charges will be brought).

ETA: we also don’t know, for certain, that it was Petgrave who was arrested. It definitely seems likely it was him, but no name’s been released.

[–]uhcayREDM - NHL 200 points201 points  (12 children)

It looked like he meant to kick him, just not in the neck. I said this from day one and got downvoted into oblivion, but anyone who knows how to skate, ESPECIALLY at a professional level, won’t fall how he fell.

[–]dranowgBOS - NHL 209 points210 points  (5 children)

I have never seen a motion like that before at any level of hockey ever

[–]Front_Economy_7766COL - NHL 49 points50 points  (0 children)

yeah, I hope I'm wrong and not calling for his head or even arrests...all I'm saying is as someone who has both played and watched hockey for the last 27 years now...that play looked so unnatural and weird how his leg flies up like that, it just makes no sense that would happen as a result of any play...again, I could be wrong, hope I'm wrong...but I absolutely get why people are thinking it looks very sketchy, it just does

edit: bad wording

[–]HockeyHippoVAN - NHL 817 points818 points  (350 children)

Looked like a freak accident to me. How could this be considered manslaughter?

[–]mrjotaiebVAN - NHL 853 points854 points  (69 children)

Manslaughter can be for accidental deaths. They’d have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was being reckless or negligent.

[–]OkAttempt4752OTT - NHL 118 points119 points  (39 children)

For reference this is how the Crown Prosecution Service defines manslaughter in the UK:

https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/homicide-murder-manslaughter-infanticide-and-causing-or-allowing-death-or-serious

Manslaughter is primarily committed in one of three ways:

1) Killing with the intent for murder but where a partial defence applies, namely loss of control, diminished responsibility or killing pursuant to a suicide pact.

2) Conduct that was grossly negligent given the risk of death, and did kill ("gross negligence manslaughter");

3) Conduct taking the form of an unlawful act involving a danger of some harm that resulted in death ("unlawful and dangerous act manslaughter").

The term "voluntary manslaughter" is commonly used to describe manslaughter falling within (1) while (2) and (3) are referred to as "involuntary manslaughter".

[–]seakucumberWSH - NHL 84 points85 points  (36 children)

This section further down seems very relevant

The breach of duty must be so bad as to be gross, i.e. criminal. This was defined in Adomako [1994] 3 All ER 79 as follows: having regard to the risk of death involved, was the conduct of the defendant so bad in all the circumstances as to amount to a criminal act or omission? The prosecution must prove the following two elements:

a) that the circumstances were such that a reasonably prudent person in the defendant's position would have foreseen a serious and obvious risk of death arising from the defendant's act or omission;

b) that the breach of duty was, in all the circumstances, so reprehensible and fell so far below the standards to be expected of a person in the defendant's position with his qualifications, experience and responsibilities that it amounted to a crime.

[–]amontpetitOTT - NHL 198 points199 points  (14 children)

There’s no way there’s a conviction here.

[–]PeterG92PIT - NHL 49 points50 points  (5 children)

Yeah, I don't see how they can. If this is Petgrave who has been arrested

[–]Sinder77OTT - NHL 70 points71 points  (4 children)

Imagine the suspect is actually the league commissioner and was arrested for negligence in not foreseeing such an accident and providing adequate safety gear for players.

Scare the absolute piss outta Bettman.

[–]DastardlyRidleylashARI - NHL 19 points20 points  (1 child)

I'd argue the the NHLPA is probably just as, if not more, liable in that instance since protecting players is literally the union's raison d'être.

Remember, the players also fought when the league tried to institute helmet mandates, it would not surprise me at all if neck guards had fallen down the same well.

[–]Sinder77OTT - NHL 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Actually it's the employers role to protect players adequately. Each party; employer, employee and union, have varying levels of responsibility to safety but at the end of the day the employer is always responsible for player safety.

When a person is injured at work, it's not the union that holds the bag for culpability.

[–]Mediocre-you-14TOR - NHL 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agreed. But I can see why they have to go through these processes given that an arena full of people witnessed a death.

[–]SchoolIguana 45 points46 points  (2 children)

Of those two elements, the prosecution must prove BOTH.

Even if you could prove that this consequence of his actions were foreseeable (which I highly doubt), it falls far short of the requirement to amount to criminality.

[–]seakucumberWSH - NHL 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Agreed, it's a very high bar (as it should be)

[–]VeryLastChanceVAN - NHL 511 points512 points  (14 children)

And for what it’s worth, being arrested and being charged with a crime are two different things.

They can easily bring him in, question him about the incident, and then let him go after confirming that he wasn’t negligent enough to charge him with anything.

[–]HNWTOR - NHL 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Canada not UK but I had a friend that accidently killed someone video taping him doing a plane stunt. Wing dipped and struck the person in the head. He spent a year in jail for manslaughter and I'm sure he's still on probation.

Totally an accident but he was still punished.

[–]TracktoyVAN - NHL 52 points53 points  (7 children)

Accidental sporting deaths in the UK are most often classified as misadventure. I have been involved in a coroners inquest in the UK following a motorcycle racing death. The word manslaughter was never uttered in the multiple interviews I was involved in.

[–]ampmzCOL - NHL 29 points30 points  (2 children)

Coroners court aren’t there to determine any offences, but the cause of death. So you wouldn’t hear the term because it isn’t relevant.

[–]hrryyssVAN - NHL 73 points74 points  (167 children)

I haven’t seen the video (nor do I want to) but did it look like he was negligent in any way? Or was it just a hockey accident?

[–]grandlinegoonerVAN - NHL 308 points309 points  (48 children)

Gonna be real with you, it’s a very strange leg motion that caused the accident. I’m not saying he meant to kill him (obviously) but I’ve never seen someone’s leg come up and connect with someone with as much force as this incident

It wasn’t like the leg swung around and grazed his neck, it had the force of a kick (not saying it was a kick though)

[–]Bullets_TMLTOR - NHL 75 points76 points  (3 children)

Yeah i've never seen someone's leg come up at that angle, on a play like that.

I'd love to see another clip at a different angle too.

Definitely not on purpose but very odd circumstances.

[–]DBZ86EDM - NHL 23 points24 points  (0 children)

The way Petgrave leg reacts to me is very similar to how Gaborik reacted in this clip and timestamp https://youtu.be/z9jQd7hhly4?t=590

In particular the right skate of Gaborik kicks back up with some force.

[–]JeffMcGeoff 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Saw something that suggested his skate actually ended up taking the path of Johnsons’ stick… it would explain the weird leg motion

[–]StewieRayVaughan 126 points127 points  (5 children)

To me it did look like he tried to stop Johnson by putting his legs up. As I said in another comment, of course he didnt try to injure him, but it did look like gross negligence. I might be wrong, the clip is very pixelated, but there's is definitely an argument to be made. I don't understand why most people will immediately shut down this argument. Let the justice system do its job.

[–]SilverSevenOTT - NHL 63 points64 points  (3 children)

As someone who has played and watched for 30 years, I have never seen anything like what happened. I dont think it was intentional, but I could see the argument it was negligent. A few former NHLers have come out saying they thought the same, not that that makes it the right read....but a lot of people on here say you have to be an idiot who never watches hockey to think it was anything but a total accident.

The video isn't graphic in any way if you wanted to watch it. Not fun to watch obviously, but there isn't blood or gore or anything.

[–]peanut-arms 19 points20 points  (0 children)

This will open the floodgates, on both sides, and become a locked thread likely.

[–]toilettingNJD - NHL 127 points128 points  (61 children)

I’ll keep it straight so we don’t get locked.

Hockey fans/players/etc. mostly view it as accidental, understand lack of control on the situation.

There is a politically charged group that is claiming it was intentional. For the most part, these people have shown much less hockey knowledge. This isn’t a judgment, more so an observation.

Edit: on second thought, lock this thread, it’s already the same recycled conversations from the other threads and Twitter

[–]bugijugi90BUF - NHL 102 points103 points  (11 children)

Well there have also been few former NHL players calling it intentional or reckless

[–]TrunkinsDAL - NHL 77 points78 points  (7 children)

Yeah, but only an idiot takes Sean Avery seriously

[–]FirebitezANA - NHL 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Intentional? Hell no

Reckless? You're blind if you don't think it was reckless.

[–]tippy432 78 points79 points  (5 children)

What are you talking about numerous people in hockey have called it a accident but absolutely a reckless hockey play considering the leg movement

[–]SickSalamanderVGK - NHL 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I don't think it's that simple. It's a very weird looking movement. The grainy video doesn't really show much detail, but there are a lot of former hockey players and hockey podcasts talking very reasonably about it looking at best reckless.

[–]ToneThugsNHarmonyNJD - NHL 21 points22 points  (0 children)

While I’m not an attorney in the UK, and I’m not even giving my opinion that he could be convicted of manslaughter, I do see how this would warrant an investigation at least. The question will be did he mean to kick Adam Johnson, not whether he meant to specifically kick him in the neck or even try to kill him. If he intended to kick and make contact, and the result of that was someone’s death, he would be looking at manslaughter. Essentially, while trying to kick Adam Johnson, was he seriously reckless in his actions that could have led to death.

[–]LgDietCokeBOS - NHL 99 points100 points  (0 children)

Idk how people disagree that the play was kind of suspect. Not saying he was going for the neck but that leg certainly seemed to come around with intention for impact.

[–]KingVikramVAN - NHL 305 points306 points  (10 children)

I 100% do not believe that Matt Petgrave set out to murder Adam Johnson.

I 100% do believe that Matt Petgrave set out to be a shithead and do a shithead action. An action that took a life.

He needs to receive punishment.

[–]ThePalmIsle 53 points54 points  (1 child)

Absolutely

It’s hilarious how all these people who “know hockey” have never seen a player who does reckless shit in that oops-wink kind of way. Zac Rinaldo, Ulf Samuelson, Matt Barnaby. There are a bunch of them

[–]leastpenguinDET - NHL 133 points134 points  (8 children)

Apparently redditors think things just… shouldn’t be investigated thoroughly because emotions?

[–]AdmiralRonSEA - NHL 32 points33 points  (3 children)

The other side is the people who instantly think arrest means your guilty and not a procedural step towards a trial which will determine that

[–]xSTLxCodyVGK - NHL 84 points85 points  (4 children)

Reading these comments I’ve learned that maybe- we the hockey community just aren’t very intelligent people.

[–]Butthole_on_my_faceCOL - NHL 41 points42 points  (0 children)

The fact Petgrave is known as the dirtiest player in that league certainly isn’t helping his case if he’s the one who has been arrested.

[–]StewieRayVaughan 170 points171 points  (30 children)

What I find fascinating is how everyone is so quick to dismiss any kind of intent from Pergrave based on a single pixelated video. Even then, in the clip his leg does go up in a weird way. I'm sure the league has access to better clips from the incident. Obviously the player didn't mean to slash Johnson's throat, but if he did purposely initiate contact with his skate, and it resulted in a player death, obviously he's gonna get prosecuted, as he should. It's not about UK law being draconian or whatever. Had this happened in the US or Canada, the same thing wouldve happened.

[–]cA05GfJ2K6DET - NHL 168 points169 points  (3 children)

Reddit seems to have made up its mind but I don’t see how you can watch that video and say he didn’t mean to lift his leg up to impede Johnson. I’m absolutely sure he didn’t mean to kill the guy or cut his throat but to lift your front leg in that situation is totally intentional.

[–]bestbiff 41 points42 points  (0 children)

I also remember back in the day allllll of the sub's comments that were convinced Matt Cooke intentionally sliced Karlsson's Achilles tendon with his skate. It wasnt a downvoted fringe position either. He was a dirty player with a dirty history and not only did he not get the benefit of doubt that it was a freak accident, but he was accused of actually trying to seriously hurt Karlsson. So why is this scenario so different? This guy apparently was a repeat offender for crossing the line. I don't think like most people this guy was thinking "I'm going to literally kill this player" but he definitely looks like he throws his skate out to obstruct him like "accidentally on purpose". That is incredibly reckless at best and manslaughter at worse. I'm curious who the experts are that the police consulted that convinced them to make an arrest when everyone would have you believe there's nothing to it what happened beyond total coincidence.

[–]Offthepine 40 points41 points  (0 children)

I feel the same way.

Since there's been all this discussion about the incident, I've found myself questioning how anyone could make that motion by accident, and have wondered why all of r/hockey was so quick to dismiss as 100% accident.

[–]madcat033PIT - NHL 84 points85 points  (0 children)

Reddit didn't make up its mind. The r/hockey mods did.

Go to the r/nhl subreddit. It's not heavily censored like these threads. Way more people agree with you, that the leg raise looks intentional.

[–]Treximo 65 points66 points  (1 child)

People in previous threads were definitely being disingenuous claiming things like this happen all the time and it was just a case of being a freak accident with a horrific result.

I am in no way saying it was definitely intentional, but the act of his leg doing what it did was so far from the norm that it 100% warranted an investigation.

[–]Drogo10 49 points50 points  (6 children)

The way his leg comes up makes it look intentional to me, and when I say intentional he obviously did not mean to cut the guys throat. He didn't mean to cut him or injure him at all but I think it is possible he meant to throw his leg into him and try to interfere with his progress. If he did then there is a crime there although I don't know what it would be (manslaughter sounds too harsh even, maybe reckless endangerment?).

[–]chrisgirouxx 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Reckless endangerment leading to death is manslaughter

[–]BangYourHead 80 points81 points  (2 children)

Genuinely pretty surprised by this, even Adam's teammates made statements supporting Petgrave

[–]shadowsbecomeshadows 50 points51 points  (0 children)

Once the law is involved, the well wishes of others don’t really matter.

I also think a lot of people are conflating manslaughter with murder. You can’t take someone’s life, even by sheer accident, without risk of prosecution. An investigation is a guarantee. He also has not been convicted of anything yet, and there’s a comment further up here that highlights how being arrested in the UK is not the same as the US.

[–]papapaIpatineEDM - NHL 20 points21 points  (2 children)

What I'm fascinated about is that in the scenario that this goes to criminal trial, what the makeup of expert testimony is going to be.

[–]jpm09tmgCGY - NHL 52 points53 points  (1 child)

They should just take a bunch of redditors because they’re all expert hockey players, lawyers, physicists and mind readers. No need to look any further

[–]NopeNotUmaThurmanCHI - NHL 15 points16 points  (2 children)

Since none of the reports mention who was arrested (apparently the norm in UK for this sort of fact-finding phase of a death investigation) it seems really odd that so many people are braying gleefully about Petgrave. The police were talking to team medical staff, too.

[–]TigerKneeMT 71 points72 points  (16 children)

The twitter replies to this BBC article are disgusting

[–]HockeystyleTBL - NHL 50 points51 points  (7 children)

Seriously they are wild. Seen multiple large twitter accounts call the people showing sympathy for Petgrave "race traitors" and saw someone quote tweet the report Petgrave was arrested with a picture of Heinrich Himmler smiling.

Europeans definitely still have the #1 claim on racism. Hope it stays online and doesn't manage to somehow influence the investigation.

[–]InheritTheWindWSH - NHL 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Every viral tweet nowadays has a Klan rally in the replies and QTs, it's really something. But at least Elon took out the bots amirite

[–]romanswinter 79 points80 points  (4 children)

I am in my 40s and have been watching hockey since I was a little kid. When I first heard this story, and the uproar from the non hockey community at large about what happened, I assumed it was just people unfamiliar with hockey overreacting to a terrible accident. I never bothered to watch the video of what happened.

But now that I just read the person was arrested, I had to watch the video because I just couldn't believe that would happen. Upon watching the video, I can honestly say I have NEVER seen anything like that EVER in a hockey game. That dude straight up tried to roundhouse the guy. I am certain he did not intend to kill Johnson, but I have never seen a more clear case of using a skate as a deadly weapon.

Now obviously I haven't watched every hockey game in existence, but I've never seen a player do a kick to the head like that. It seems like an unpopular opinion around here, but I fully support the police arresting this guy and I hope he gets charged and faces his day in court.

[–]Newpower608NYR - NHL 32 points33 points  (0 children)

The video is super damning. I agree that he didn't intend to kill him, but that is the definition of manslaughter. I think he meant to knee him, but he was caught up with the other dude before the maneuver. He then attempted to follow through with hurting Johnson, and he kicked him in the neck because he was off balance. It makes sense why he was arrested, I hope every person on this sub watches that video to determine their own beliefs before they weigh in

[–]Constant-Squirrel555OTT - NHL 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Such a fucked up situation

[–]GangreneMachineVAN - NHL 24 points25 points  (2 children)

No matter what happens, even if Petgrave is released and no charges are made, his life is effectively ruined. It will cling to his name like a disease forever. Such an unfortunate situation.

Even if he made a reckless decision, it had extreme and unprecedented consequences. It reminds me of that story where the two guys randomly threw a rock off the side of a mountain and it struck a climber in the head and killed him instantly.

[–]kristianroberts 125 points126 points  (27 children)

Just said in another thread, if this is Petgrave it’s devastating. I thought this would be an outcome given English law, I doubt anyone connected with the sport would think a potential conviction of manslaughter is justice.

[–]FirebitezANA - NHL 83 points84 points  (13 children)

Who else could it be?

[–]fertilecatfish19COL - NHL 147 points148 points  (10 children)

Could be someone involved in the emergency response, as the response time was incredibly slow. The article just has literally no information in it. Just says A man has been arrested.

[–]HockeystyleTBL - NHL 88 points89 points  (4 children)

The article just has literally no information in it. Just says A man has been arrested.

Based on my experience with Premier League player's legal scandals I think this is just because of the UK's incredibly lenient defamation laws. It's almost certainly Petgrave.

[–]InheritTheWindWSH - NHL 9 points10 points  (2 children)

reminds me of learning about the other Adam Johnson

[–]InocainVGK - NHL 6 points7 points  (1 child)

The pedo footballer one?

[–]kristianroberts 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Or could even be whoever is in charge of player safety in the Steelers or EIHL

[–]PurplebuzzTOR - NHL 65 points66 points  (12 children)

I was assured by this sub this was not a possibility.

[–]tippy432 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Don’t you know Redditors know the situation better from a illegal stream clip than the experts and investigators that where definitely involved

[–]Newpower608NYR - NHL 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Why are people surprised about this?

[–]PeterG92PIT - NHL 65 points66 points  (18 children)

I hope someone is looking after Petgrave as I dread to think what he is going through right now.

[–]world_citizen7 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Very difficult to understand if they player or someone else is being charged. Another article on ESPN: https://www.espn.com/nhl/story/\_/id/38896995/man-arrested-suspicion-manslaughter-adam-johnson-death

[–]loco_canadianTOR - NHL 63 points64 points  (1 child)

What the actual fuck?