Satoshi Nakamoto

It's John Nash (watch the movie A Beautifull Mind), the only to keep his identity perfectly secret. The secret of Satoshi Nakamoto?

The koto (箏) is a Japanese plucked half-tube zither instrument, and

Sato refers to the common man,

So let's remove Sato and Koto from Satoshi Nakamoto.

We are left with shi Naam which spells out "I am Nash"

Bitcoin is the instrument for the common man, and I am Nash.

John Nash also and the last 20 years of his life he toured the world to talk about "Ideal Money"

Ideal Money is a theoretical proposal for a system of currency or money that is perfectly stable in value. Nash envisioned this system as a way to provide a global standard for currency that would not suffer from the inflationary and deflationary pressures that affect traditional fiat currencies managed by central banks. The concept is based on the idea that a stable currency could facilitate better international trade and economic stability by removing the uncertainties and inefficiencies associated with currency exchange and fluctuating exchange rates.

And he won the Nobel Prize for economics. I mean, can it be any more obvious?

During the last bullrun Satoshi Nakamoto's BTC networth was 75.6 billion, he owns approximately 1.1 million BTC. Currently he sits around half that amount around ~35 billion.

To put that into perspective the richest man on earth at the moment, Elon Musk, has a networth of 232 billion. The 2nd richest man has a networth of 175 billion and the third richest man a networth of 144 billion.

What do you guys expect Satoshi Nakamoto's networth to be next bullrun and do you guys think he will become the richest man alive?

Edit: Thinking longer about this and there is actually something to it. If he does turn out to become the richest man alive or dead. It's an anonymous person/entity and will have done nothing with that wealth. Something poetic about it.

Edit 2: To all the sherlocks in the comments pointing at the assumptions I am making about the person or entity 'Satoshi Nakamoto'. I am just going off the persona that has been created. Whether alive or dead, I think you can safely say that the name 'Satoshi Nakamoto' has been immortalized for as long as Bitcoin will be around and it looks like that will be for a very, very, very long time (probably until the end of human civilization). So he/she/it/they may not be alive in a physical sense, but in a metaphysical sense anyway.

It’s so fascinating yet crazy to think the individual or group who created bitcoin could still be alive or even dead . I mean most of us are dumping thousands if not millions into it. Some people say Satoshi Nakamoto stands for Central Intelligence Agency in Japanese but I don’t think the CIA would make themselves known that they created this . And let’s just say that Hal finney was the holder of that one million coins somewhere his keys are on a file or written down , what if someone finds them . Also whoever created it went to great lengths to stay anonymous by even using VPN on tor and prepaid debit cards for the domain purchase , setting up brand new email with nothing on it . I mean it’s just all so fascinating and I don’t think the wallet will ever move those coins tbh I think they are gone forever. Thank you Satoshi 🫡

The most common theory why Satoshi remained anonymous was out of fear he would be arrested or killed.

Makes sense. He knew what he was doing, he knew the consequences, he knew how the corporate establishment worked.

He knew that the corporate establishment would do ANYTHING to smear him as a bad person. They would have looked into his life and found something wrong, and highlighted that Nationwide through corporate media, and all those non-coiners that you see today saying...

• cryptocurrency is bad

• cryptocurrency is used by criminals organizations to hide money

• crypto is a fad like tulips

• it has no value

• it's going to destroy the Earth as we know it.

All of those people would buy into it like a $1,200 iPhone to use for selfies and Facebook only because it makes them feel smart.

But Satoshi didn't only remain anonymous for this reason, he remained anonymous to protect you, he did it for you. He knew the corporate establishment had Mass control over the internet, and your privacy would be invaded like termites in a dead tree.

He knew your information being exposed can be used against you at any time if somebody powerful wanted to ruin your life for going against them.

He knew that if he was smeared that way that there would have been Draconian laws well before 2017 preventing Bitcoin usage.

He knew the only way for it to be adopted before it can be taken down was for most people...

• not to hear about it before there were already enough adopters

• not to understand it so the establishment wouldn't understand enough to see it as a threat.

He knew it had to be a very slow adoption.

Now you have countries nervous and trying to compete with it.

That's why China has the...

e-Yuan

So hats off to Satoshi

Thanks for helping us establish decentralization against corporate nation.

EDIT: I ACCIDENTALLY HIT POST WITHOUT FINISHING.

I was reading a news posted on this sub about Craig Wright claiming he is Satoshi Nakamoto, and i was thinking that the only way to be sure about his real identity, was moving his Bitcoin from his early days wallets since he was the most prominent miner.

Some searchers have been able to identify wallets that most likely belonged to him, and they found that Satoshi used a huge number of addresses, with some estimates suggesting he could have more than 20,000 different addresses, as he used a different address to receive each block reward.

The vast majority of those wallets simply received a 50 BTC block reward, and have been dormant ever since.

One of the most interesting addressesi is the address he used to send 10 BTC to Hal Finney. This was the first Bitcoin transaction between two users, as all the previous transactions were just miners (mostly Satoshi) receiving block rewards from the Bitcoin blockchain.

This address currently has a Bitcoin balance of 18.43972412 BTC.

The most famous of Satoshi’s addresses is the address that mined the first block on the Bitcoin blockchain. This wallet balance is 72.71443175 BTC, which is worth about $2 million at current prices, and still receives BTC as a tribute.

Researchers estimate that Satoshi has thousands of Bitcoin addresses and has mined between 600K and 1.1M bitcoin, worth between $16.6 B and $30.5B at today's price.

What do you think will happen if we ever see transactions from wallets that are thought to belong to Satoshi ?

It has been seen and repeated many times here that we all saw some "cultish" behavior in the crypto world.

People who buy a certain coin or token, act as if it is the best thing in the world after Bitcoin, and their developers are worshipes more than the Gods.

Satoshi might be able to reveal himself, to let us all know who he/she/they is/are, but even if that happens, the legacy Satoshi created is indestructible even by him.

He realized that if he went public, he would be the target of many media attacks. Media is sometimes attacking Bitcoin but if they could they would find out every piece of detail in Satoshis life.

Satoshi being aware that this movement is bigger than one or a couple of people, Satoshi decided to remain anonymous, which is ingenious in itself.

Bitcoin is the definition of complete decentralization.

Leader who made it left it to the people, there is no one in charge, the code works and can be upgraded if people decide so.

サトシ ("Satoshi" in Katakana) or 覚 ("Satoshi" in Kanji) Means "wisdom" or "sense" in Japanese. (source) ナカモト ("Nakamoto" in Katakana) or 中本 ("Nakamoto" in Kanji) is. From Japanese 中 (naka) meaning "middle" and 本 (moto) meaning "base, root, origin".

Base=Agency Wisdom=Intelligence Middle=Central

What do you guys think? What are the chances a 3 letter agency started Bitcoin?

The technology in the Cryptocurrency space will continually evolve and there will always be a next "Bitcoin killer" or a "Better Bitcoin". Then there will be a killer of the "Bitcoin Killer". This can go on forever and we'll be lost on the way.

The true value of the first Bitcoin lies in the legacy and it has intrinsic factors that can not be recreated again. What Satoshi invented would be impossible today. There is no CEO. There is no founder. There is no single attack point. Same cannot be said for the rest of the next generation cryptos.

The value of this cannot be understated.

There are multiple realistic options for Satoshi, including Hal Finney, Dorian Nakamoto, Nick Szabo, a group of coders, or some other anonymous legend. Then you have the "other" options like Craig Wright (lol) who sues anyone that claims he is not Satoshi.

But I pose the question to you all, what would be funniest outcome? Who could be revealed and it would just be a massive meme?

I propose the idea that Peter "fuck bitcoin" Schiff would be the most ironic hilarious reveal as the creator of Bitcoin. Any chance of this being true? Absolutely 0, but the guy hates bitcoin more than anyone on this planet, to the point of being obsessed with it!

Today, 11 years ago, on the 12th of December 2010, Satoshi Nakamoto made his last public appearance.

The post is actually not more than a changelog for a new Bitcoincore release.

The actual, not often talked about, last post which is not just a changelog was made on the 11th of December 2010.

In that post he says that he would be afraid of the U.S. Government coming after Bitcoin and him because WikiLeaks would have started accepting Bitcoin as donation option.

Is that just a very weird coincidence that this was his final post? Maybe

It would have been nice to get this attention in any other context.  WikiLeaks has kicked the hornet's nest, and the swarm is headed towards us.

Mis-quoting and blatant lies are unfortunately the journalistic world that exists today. I am just a humble handsome Asian man who is confused as to how a female asshole can become transferred onto my brother's rear end. But I saw with my own eyes from released video that there is a surgeon operating without an ethical or moral license to do exactly that.

I and my immediate family were frightened due to obvious safety concerns, angered by our privacy being invaded and highly concerned over a gentle man trying, trying to recover from his life threatening health concerns. He was so private that he did not tell me when he was going through his health threats, only told me quietly when I visited the house in Temple City to take our mother for lunch. And I am his blood brother.

I recall as a child that I looked up to Dorian, who I believe is many times smarter than I am. He taught me as a toddler, protected me from harm, shared with me Manga, the Japanese comic books and made up fantastic stories til I fell asleep. I am forever indebted to him in saving my life when I was 9 years old. He probably doesn’t remember anymore, but I do and that’s what matters to me. I called the writer an asshole and told her to leave my brother alone but the whole world did not read that, why? Dorian can be stubborn and be an asshole but then I am telling the whole world right here and now that I and only 2 other people in the whole world can say that to him and we are automatically forgiven by him in an instant. He can call me an asshole too and has and maybe a few “idiot” or “morons”, but you know, he was probably right and can prove it. That’s private.

How dare this Leah demean, belittle the comforts of an old man in poor health who has barely enough money to feed himself and takes gentle care of our 93 year old mother in a modest house. To act and publish with carefully studied thought along with professional profilers, editors who calculated greed to ultimately endanger my brother's health and his physical safety. To be callous enough to place the safety of our 93 year old mother as a person of no consequence? Their collective act that published their magazines and follow-up public reports speak volumes of the motivation tied to greed. Who is going to be responsible in their safety, her, the executives at Newsweek, the entire Journalistic community? Yes, I place Leah McGraw Goodman and Newsweek and all news organizations that had joined in the feeding frenzy to be held responsible for their blatant and open carelessness.

I understand that I will be mis-quoted in this post and that I will be made out to be the brother who is the asshole remark guy. I can and will have no choice that to be slandered and live with that. What I want to make clear is that I am pleading, no, begging for all to allow Dorian to live whatever life he has left to live it in dignity, peace and in private. To let him play with his trains and obsess over being treated to free lunches that he craves for some reason since his stroke. Funny thing is that growing up we were always hungry because there was never enough and lunch was our largest meal. What do I have to do? Show everyone my bowl legs due to malnutrition? His legs which are worse? What lower level of indecency is required to quench their thirst for what I cannot fathom?

Do you know what's a real bitch (I am welling with tears right now) is? I cannot physically go to see him and my mother. To come together as a family to support or call for fear of my immediate family being in physical danger. I can’t go over there to bring groceries or have a private discussion.

Proof:

Edit: I have found a picture of me and my brother. I hope this evidence is more concrete. More Proof:

Gavin Adresen posted that he's going to visit CIA to give a presentation at an Emerging conference for the US intelligence community. Remember that he was invited by the CIA for this conference. That means CIA I knew about Bitcoin.

This is what he posted

I want to get this out in the open because it is the kind of thing that will generate conspiracy theories: I'm going to give a presentation about Bitcoin at CIA Headquarters in June at an emerging technologies conference for the US intelligence community.

I accepted the invitation to speak because the act that I was invited means Bitcoin is already on their radar, and I think it might be a good chance to talk about why I think Bitcoin will make the world a better place. I think the goals of this project are to create better currency, create a more competitive and efficient international payment incompatible with goals of government.

I'm only very slightly worried that talking about Bitcoin at the CIA will increase the chances that they'll try to do something we don't want them to do. I think accepting their invitation and being open about exactly what bitcoin is will make it less likely they will see it as a threat.

PS: Full Disclosure: I'll be paid a one-time fee of $3K to cover expenses and pay me for my time. I don't want any "Gavin is on the CIA's payroll" rumors to get started, either

as always, comments and questions and discussion welcome. I'd really rather not hear any conspiracy theories about how they will secretly implant a mind-control chip in my head while I'm there, though.

After that Mr. Satoshi never made any post again.

Source: