Former Top USAF F-16 pilot reacts to the 'Aguadilla UFO' report
This was fantastic! I like Chris. Seems like the kind of guy I would want to have a beer with. I remember seeing this footage, forgot all about it. Hard to deny this one. Quite simply it is either some sort of high tech drone (almost certainly NOT flown by US military) OR UAP (that isn’t animal/lantern/radar spoof).
I say it wouldn’t be US Military flying this as this was over a civilian airport and caused traffic delay. No way US military would do any sort of exercise over civilian restricted air space. Also if they wanted to keep this drone a secret why would they risk exposure in this way? Makes no logical sense. If it was an adversary, it would make more sense. But that would be another concerning issue.
Amazing breakdown. I've seen other videos this guy has done floating around but didn't pay super close attention. Will definitely be checking out more of his content. It's great for dumbass'es like me who don't understand all the lingo or plot lines on maps etc. He does a great job of keeping it simple to understand.
Wish we could have this for all legit footage!
yes we need this, also everyone should get familiar with https://www.uaptheory.com/ This site has ai upscaled video of this
This site has by far the best breakdown and analysis of that specific ufo video, presented with a very compelling theory.
That's what the topic needs: Professionals in the field doing a proper non-biased analysis of whats going on. What a time to be alive.
TLDR: The lights seen on the corbell latest video are not consistant with FAA nav lights but could have a pattern and look weird + seem “to match” the triangle NVG footage (“triangles” vs iTs BoKeH) we saw previously.
Aguadilla event: the object not a Chinese lantern; no way. Praises the 2013 Aguadilla Puerto Rico UAP report (as he should. It’s a very thorough report).
Other amateur footage shown of potentially similar objects filmed/witnessed close to the location of the Aguadilla UAP event.
Lehto's wife seen creeping in the background midway through the video lol :P
From the Aguadilla UAP report:
"Lastly, the target is no longer detected on radar during the time that the unknown is detected on the thermal imaging video. At that point in time the object is below the Pico Del Este radar's detectable altitude."
Later it says:
"The UFO locations marked in red are exact locations of the object at those times due to accurate altitude values being available."
Does anyone know how they are accurately determining the altitude if they don't have any radar data? It wasn't clear to me where they came up with these altitude values.
Finally, is it really a good idea to quote the anonymous letter in the report, claiming:
"If you ever wanted to truly see how aliens are monitoring or studying us, and witness their technology, this is it."
?
This doesn't exactly inspire confidence that the report is truly unbiased and making an honest attempt at being scientific.
Very simple debunk of CL.
CL on thermal have 1 black spot when in hot black mode. That's the fire and its always on the bottom of the CL. In the 2013 video there are 2 black spots and they are at the top of the objects when they come out of the water completely ruling out CL.
I think a ufo could land at the White House, an extraterrestrial get out and shake the presidents hand and people would still say it's a Chinese lantern.
About Community
Members
Online