HyPeRxColoRz

And I stand by what I said in that you clearly haven't spent much time around children.

Shes blinking like that because she has fake lashes on and they're heavy. She's not sitting stiff she's sitting upright. And again, why tf would you give a kid candy if they're annoying you. Camera or not she didn't have to do that.

I think you're just projecting dude.

Didn't say she wanted a kid rubbing against her, just that she's probably used to that kind of attention.

And if you think this is abnormal behavior for a child then you clearly haven't been around many children. Kids do quirky shit like this all the time.

This is the cutest thing I've seen in ages and of course people on reddit just want to tear it down

Her smile is perfectly natural until she realizes she's being filmed, pretty sure that's what made her uncomfortable.

It's not socially acceptable to push a kid away but it's perfectly acceptable to move seats or ask the parent to tell her kid to stop. The lady does neither.

Also, if shes riding the subway in cosplay you really think this is the first time she's gotten this kind of attention? Any serious cosplayer like she is clearly that goes out in public would expect this kind of attention.

Tell me you hate kids without telling me you hate kids.

You also clearly haven't had many interactions with kids if you think telling her to stop should be enough to get her to stop.

She doesn't even notice she's being recorded until a third of the way into the video. If anything, it's being filmed that made her uncomfortable.

Not everyone is operating under some ulterior motive at all times.

Really people? She has a perfectly normal smile on her face and she even gives the kids candy. She doesn't look annoyed in the slightest.

Ok since most people seem to be treating this as an obvious "yes" I'm going to argue the opposite.

First off, I think there's one very important detail people tend to gloss over when analyzing the history of men's attraction to breasts: men don't have them. Men have no concept of what boobs are like until they get to see/feel/taste them for themselves. I'm fairly certain this plays a huge part in their "taboo" or sexualization. Ears, on the other hand, men do have, and there's very little difference between men's ears and women's ears. There wouldn't be nearly the same curiosity.

Sure, there are people from places like Shri Lanka and parts of Africa where breasts are not sexualized because women being topless is extremely normalized. That doesn't make the inverse true in the sense that anything you cover up will eventually become sexualized.

It's true that Victorian England had men thirsting over things as mundane as an ankle, but this is also one of the most sexually repressed societies in history and when you're that horny all the time anything will set you off. Same thing can be said about Muslim countries today.

So yeah, in conclusion, I don't think it's a forgone conclusion that covering up a random body part would guarantee that the body part becomes sexualized, At least not without external factors like religion and government influencing people's opinions.

To give you a straight up answer, I'm assuming he meant scantily clad women and/or women in clothing that sexualizes their body to a large degree. To put it bluntly, women that dress slutty.

Thats already how happens as is. By definition all rules are up to the interpretation of the refs. Another ref could have just as easily not given Scharr a red in this situation and it would probably be a less controversial call, or at worst just as controversial.

That's exactly what the people above you are trying to say you flippin rube. They're not claiming the art style will change completely just that they'll likely add better art/textures at some point, especially in the bases which largely lack any textures in the first place.

That... sounds dangerous. What happens if there's an emergency and you can't access your phone?

3 & 4 are AI but the rest are pretty cool

..Is the time it takes to dry off a problem for some people? It only takes me like, 2-3 minutes as it is.

Barf.

How is Disney so consistently devoid of any creativity when it comes to star wars?

This looks like every generic 80's adventure film with a star wars skin slapped over it. Absolutely nothing original about it. Maybe that's some people's cup of tea but not mine