SpaceX
Share & discuss informative content on: * Astrophysics * Cosmology * Space Exploration * Planetary Science * Astrobiology
Share & discuss informative content on: * Astrophysics * Cosmology * Space Exploration * Planetary Science * Astrobiology
You learn something new every day; what did you learn today? Submit interesting and specific facts about something that you just found out here.
Welcome to r/SpaceX, the premier SpaceX discussion community and the largest fan-run board on the American aerospace company SpaceX. We recommend using r/SpaceX with Old Reddit. This board is not an official outlet for SpaceX information.
A place for major news from around the world, excluding US-internal news.
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20240301011608im_/https://preview.redd.it/spacex-is-making-a-dent-in-the-colorado-river-v0-4n1ynzjoqyjc1.jpeg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=5c11e1baaf6bd211450a6de686e1900bcb47613e)
![r/Austin - SpaceX is making a dent in the Colorado River](http://web.archive.org./web/20240301011608im_/https://preview.redd.it/spacex-is-making-a-dent-in-the-colorado-river-v0-4n1ynzjoqyjc1.jpeg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=5c11e1baaf6bd211450a6de686e1900bcb47613e)
Share & discuss informative content on: * Astrophysics * Cosmology * Space Exploration * Planetary Science * Astrobiology
Subreddit dedicated to the news and discussions about the creation and use of technology and its surrounding issues.
A place for all things Texas. Please familiarize yourself with the rules, y'all.
The place for news articles about current events in the United States and the rest of the world. Discuss it all here.
Subreddit dedicated to the news and discussions about the creation and use of technology and its surrounding issues.
Join r/WorkReform! Fight for a good quality of life for everyone who sells their labor!
Subreddit dedicated to the news and discussions about the creation and use of technology and its surrounding issues.
/r/union is a subreddit about people working somewhere banding together to fight to improve their lives in a union. Organize your workplace today!
Welcome to r/SpaceXLounge, the sister subreddit to r/SpaceX, and a place for relaxed and laid-back discussion. We recommend Old Reddit with r/SpaceXLounge. This subreddit is not an official outlet for SpaceX information.
In case you are not familiar with the WeWork story, it was a real estate company that claimed that it is revolutionizing shared work space or whatever, it basically rented office buildings for long term from owners, and then rented out offices separately for individuals.
The company grew very quickly and at some point I believe they were the largest real estate company in the world, but after a few years of activity it turned out that they were losing money. They basically used the investors money for rapid expansion, and when they went to IPO and had to disclose their books they were exposed.
I think something like that may be happening at SpaceX. First it's a private company that keeps its financial affairs in secret, therefore one can only guess what is going on over there. But recent report by WSJ claimed that SpaceX is losing money. They lost a billion in 2021, and half a billion in 2022.
Now I find it very strange. They are the company that claims that they reinvented the space industry, that they managed to drastically cut the cost of rockets by preserving them by being able to land them safely. Taking this into account, that they are the only space company in the world that is able to reuse rockets, and they are very busy and getting new orders all the time, but nevertheless they still lose money?
They are supposed to be making bank, or at least to break even by now, instead they lose hundreds of millions each year. If they are not profitable by this point, when will they be?
Also all this talk about Starlink... but it was also subsidized, and now the US goverment decided to pull the plug by not renewing the 900 mil grant for next year. It's not a commercially viable product on its own. Is SpaceX going to lose money on it too without the subsidies? 900 mil is a lot of money.
I mean I don't know... maybe they invest extensively in their next rocket "Starship" and maybe that's why they lose money, and when it will be finished then maybe they'll become profitable. I don't know. That's if I'm trying to be optimistic.
But something is fishy about this spaceX. I won't be surprised if it goes bust if the US government decides to pull the plug on it. A revolutionary company that redefined the industry is supposed to be profitable and not depend on government subsidies, which is not the case with SpaceX. Something fishy is going on over there.
Musk also had to attract a shitload of money to be able to develope all those rockets, I'm sure he had to sell a lot of shares to get that money. I won't be surprised if he only owns like 10% of SpaceX.
This is NOT a politically moderate subreddit! It IS a political subreddit for moderately expressed opinions and civil discourse. If you are looking for civility, moderation and tolerance come on in!
DataIsBeautiful is for visualizations that effectively convey information. Aesthetics are an important part of information visualization, but pretty pictures are not the sole aim of this subreddit.
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20240301011608im_/https://preview.redd.it/spacex-number-of-successful-landings-v0-3nw9rhi975kc1.png?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=6328501b94c6dbd917a4fb01e339adde039207ea)
![r/dataisbeautiful - [OC] SpaceX number of successful landings](http://web.archive.org./web/20240301011608im_/https://preview.redd.it/spacex-number-of-successful-landings-v0-3nw9rhi975kc1.png?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=6328501b94c6dbd917a4fb01e339adde039207ea)
Welcome to r/SpaceX, the premier SpaceX discussion community and the largest fan-run board on the American aerospace company SpaceX. We recommend using r/SpaceX with Old Reddit. This board is not an official outlet for SpaceX information.
This sub is dedicated to discussion and questions about embedded systems: "a controller programmed and controlled by a real-time operating system (RTOS) with a dedicated function within a larger mechanical or electrical system, often with real-time computing constraints."
I recently got a coding assessment for a sensor firmware position at SpaceX and pretty much bombed it. I wanted to outline what the assessment was and to ask if it seems more like a “Leet Code” type question or if you think it was something that is good to vet for a position like this?
Some additional background. I had an initial phone screen to talk about my background and work history with the recruiter and then moved on to a technical phone screen with the team manager and a senior engineer. That phone screen was very good in that both asked probing questions about basics of bare-metal development and also a good bit on signal processing, filtering, and sampling since it was very relevant for their teams job of sensor development. Both interviewers were asking really good questions and I felt like I was being asked about stuff relevant for the job. I thought I had bombed that part because I only vaguely knew about the signal processing stuff way back from uni days but seemed to do well enough that I got the take home assessment.
The take home assessment itself was coding done in either C or C++ (your choice). It was a gene sequencing program where you’re given a file that contains a long sequence of nucleotides (A, T, C, G) along with spaces, new lines, other irrelevant characters or numbers. You need to read the file, detect the start codon (ATG), process it codons following that start codon until you hit an end codon (3 possible codon combinations, I forget what they were). As you’re reading and processing the gene you need to translate the codons to the appropriate amino acid (you’re given a translation table in the problem statement and can also look it up online) and basically construct the protein (amino acid combination, another series of letters/characters) based on each three letter codon with in an appropriate gene (defined by a proper start and end codon). Then the final output should be the protein, the gene sequence (with start and end codons) that it got translated from (and there could be one or more genes with slightly different codons that map to the same protein so you need to list all of them), and the number of times that protein appears.
All of this should work within O(N2) time. And you’re given 6 hours to complete the program with the first hour given to write up a plan for how you’re going to code it and estimate the big-O performance.
I chose to do it in C and build up a linked list of the full sequence and then do a one time traversal through that linked list and build out another linked list of the protein, associated gene(s), and gene count….and botched it badly because of confusion with managing the multiple linked lists head node. (One big take away for me is that my C coding really needs to be stepped up).
My question (from before) is do you guys think this is more of a “Leet Code” style question or something that is fair for a primarily bare-metal position? (I even asked about RTOS use and they said it’s not as much).
I’m not complaining about this as it was pretty fun honestly and at least I know I need a lot more work on my C now. But I wanted to get other peoples thoughts on this.
Welcome to r/WorkersStrikeBack, a leftist, anti-capitalist, socialist subreddit that is dedicated to support worker strikes, protests and unions all over the world, address the obvious problems related to an average worker's workplace, offer advice to a fellow worker struggling with their workplace problems and mock or satirize any kind of anti-worker sentiment. Workers may also share stories related to their workplace problems.
Welcome to r/SpaceXLounge, the sister subreddit to r/SpaceX, and a place for relaxed and laid-back discussion. We recommend Old Reddit with r/SpaceXLounge. This subreddit is not an official outlet for SpaceX information.
It's no secret that SpaceX has driven commercial launch prices down several times (, ). But I haven't seen estimates of how much impact it had on NASA, so I tried to answer this question.
Lower bound
To establish a minimum savings estimate I took SpaceX and 2nd contractor prices in the COTS, CRS, CCDev and CCP programs, as well as available US launch vehicles based on spacecraft mass and orbit. Please note that in the absence of SpaceX, their place would have been taken by the contractor ranked 3rd in the competition whose bid was worse than the 2nd in terms of price or other important parameters.
For example, Dragon 1 originally had a payload capacity of up and 2,500 kg down, while Cygnus had only 2,000 kg up and zero down. Since the Space Shuttle retirement in 2011 the only other recoverable capsule has been the Russian Soyuz with a 50 kg payload down and ~2 flights per year, making Dragon 1 unique in its capabilities. So the actual savings and benefits of choosing SpaceX would most likely have been noticeably higher than this estimate.
Mission | Launch Vehicle | Price, $M | Backup | Price, $M | Savings, $M | Savings, 2024 $M |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dragon C100 | F9/Dragon | Cygnus | 155 | 23 | -1.7 | |
COTS Demo 1 | F9/Dragon | 132 | Cygnus | 155 | 23 | -1.7 |
COTS Demo 2 | F9/Dragon | 132 | Cygnus | 155 | 23 | -1.7 |
CRS-1 | F9/Dragon | Cygnus | 237.5 | 104.2 | 141 | |
CRS-2 | F9/Dragon | 133.3 | Cygnus | 237.5 | 104.2 | 138.1 |
CRS-3 | F9/Dragon | 133.3 | Cygnus | 237.5 | 104.2 | 138.1 |
CRS-4 | F9/Dragon | 133.3 | Cygnus | 237.5 | 104.2 | 138.1 |
CRS-5 | F9/Dragon | 133.3 | Cygnus | 237.5 | 104.2 | 134 |
DSCOVR | Falcon 9 | Atlas V 401 | 12 | 16.2 | ||
CRS-6 | F9/Dragon | 133.3 | Cygnus | 237.5 | 104.2 | 134 |
Jason-3 | Falcon 9 | Atlas V 401 | 109 | 27 | 36.5 | |
CRS-8 | F9/Dragon | 133.3 | Cygnus | 237.5 | 104.2 | 133.8 |
CRS-9 | F9/Dragon | 133.3 | Cygnus | 237.5 | 104.2 | 133.8 |
CRS-10 | F9/Dragon | 133.3 | Cygnus | 237.5 | 104.2 | 132.1 |
CRS-11 | F9/Dragon | 133.3 | Cygnus | 237.5 | 104.2 | 132.1 |
CRS-12 | F9/Dragon | 133.3 | Cygnus | 237.5 | 104.2 | 132.1 |
CRS-13 | F9/Dragon | Cygnus | 237.5 | 87.5 | 110.9 | |
CRS-14 | F9/Dragon | 150 | Cygnus | 237.5 | 87.5 | 108.7 |
TESS | Falcon 9 | Atlas V 401 | 109 | 22 | 28.7 | |
CRS-15 | F9/Dragon | 150 | Cygnus | 237.5 | 87.5 | 108.7 |
CRS-16 | F9/Dragon | Cygnus | 237.5 | 97.5 | 121.1 | |
Demo-1 | F9/Crew Dragon | Atlas V/Starliner | 770 | 1546.7 | ||
CRS-17 | F9/Dragon | 140 | Cygnus | 237.5 | 97.5 | 118.2 |
CRS-18 | F9/Dragon | 140 | Cygnus | 237.5 | 97.5 | 118.2 |
CRS-19 | F9/Dragon | 140 | Cygnus | 237.5 | 97.5 | 118.2 |
CRS-20 | F9/Dragon | 140 | Cygnus | 237.5 | 97.5 | 116.1 |
Demo-2 | F9/Crew Dragon | 875.5 | Atlas V/Starliner | 1,645.5 | 770 | 1546.7 |
Crew-1 | F9/Crew Dragon | Atlas V/Starliner | 127.1 | 151.4 | ||
Sentinel-6 | Falcon 9 | Atlas V 401 | 109 | 12 | 15.2 | |
Crew-2 | F9/Crew Dragon | 234.4 | Atlas V/Starliner | 361.5 | 127.1 | 149.6 |
Crew-3 | F9/Crew Dragon | 234.4 | Atlas V/Starliner | 361.5 | 127.1 | 149.6 |
DART | Falcon 9 | Atlas V 401 | 109 | 66 | 80 | |
IXPE | Falcon 9 | Atlas V 401 | 109 | 58.7 | 71.2 | |
Crew-4 | F9/Crew Dragon | 234.4 | Atlas V/Starliner | 361.5 | 127.1 | 142.9 |
Crew-5 | F9/Crew Dragon | 234.4 | Atlas V/Starliner | 361.5 | 127.1 | 142.9 |
Crew-6 | F9/Crew Dragon | 234.4 | Atlas V/Starliner | 361.5 | 127.1 | 132.3 |
Crew-7 | F9/Crew Dragon | Atlas V/Starliner | 361.5 | 102.8 | 107 | |
Psyche | FH | 36 | 42.9 | |||
PACE | Falcon 9 | Atlas V 401 | 109 | 28.6 | 34.1 | |
$7,108M | $11,715M | $4,659M | $6,792M |
This $6.8B estimate also doesn’t take into account the drop in launch prices of SpaceX rivals driven by competition. For example, ULA was forced to reduce minimum launch prices from to in 2016 and to ~$100M with the debut of the Vulcan Centaur earlier this year. At the same time, maximum prices dropped from to ~$200M. Without competition, prices followed inflation, which would have brought them to the range of $160M to $500M by now. This would lead the total estimate to ~$9B.
Upper bound
Between 1974 and 1987, attempted to commercialize the launch market using the approach of mass production of simple boosters. In 1997-2000, tried the classic approach, but gave up when they saw potential competition from the launch vehicles that NASA was going to fund. Between 1993 and 2010, tried to develop something like the canceled Falcon 5 with a reusable booster, initially with private funding and then with NASA's help.
The last example was by SpaceX, which ultimately led to the start of the COTS program. But it's hard to imagine that they could have been a commercial success considering they spent almost on a ready launch vehicle with performance between Falcon 1 () and Falcon 9 v1.0 ($360M) that the surge in activity in the of communications satellite constellations.
Even without SpaceX's intervention, by the time the Kistler K-1 could have been ready it would have had almost no payloads on the commercial market and too few NASA payloads to justify reusability. Kistler's successor to the COTS program (Orbital) would face the same problem of insufficient launch cadence for Antares, which would prevent them from driving down prices.
Watching this struggle leads to wonder: what would have happened if COTS and subsequent programs had never arisen? Or what if COTS had arisen, but was killed by Congress at the first pretext of underperformance? They have never been fans of commercialization and would happily return NASA to the old business approach if they could find an excuse.
According to NASA estimates the old approach would have cost in 2017 prices ($2.2-5.1B in current) just to build a Falcon 9 analog, not counting Dragon 1 and redundancy in the form of Antares/Cygnus which combined cost NASA only $821M ($1B current). A Falcon 9 Block 5/Crew Dragon replacement would cost NASA ($34.6-48.8B current) while SpaceX and Boeing's fixed contracts only provide ($7B current) for building redundant manned spacecraft.
This means NASA has saved $28.8-41.8B on the COTS and CCDev programs alone, which would need to be doubled for redundancy. But let's be honest, without the commercial program, NASA would never have had the redundancy just like Mercury, Gemini, Apollo and Space Shuttle never had it. That means the top estimate could be anywhere between $38B and $50B.
Near future (2024-2025)
Date | Mission | Launch Vehicle | Price, $M | Backup | Price, $M | Savings, $M |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024-02 | Crew-8 | F9/Crew Dragon | 258.7 | Atlas V/Starliner | 361.5 | 102.8 |
2024-08 | Crew-9 | F9/Crew Dragon | 258.7 | Atlas V/Starliner | 361.5 | 102.8 |
2024-10 | Europa Clipper | FH | 3,464 | 3,286 | ||
2025-04 | SPHEREx | Falcon 9 | Vulcan Centaur | 100 | 1.2 | |
2025-11 | Sentinel-6B | Falcon 9 | Vulcan Centaur | 100 | 6 | |
2025 | Crew-10 | F9/Crew Dragon | Atlas V/Starliner | 361.5 | 73.5 | |
$1,176M | $4,749M | $3,572M |
I think one cautionary story is worth mentioning in this context. The Europa Clipper mission was originally designed to be launched on . In , Congress directed NASA to use SLS instead, which would have required a redesign of the spacecraft to withstand the rougher launch on it. According to the NASA OIG report from 2021 the launch cost of the first four SLS missions was estimated to be at least each and in 2023 they raised that estimate by another .
Furthermore, Europa Clipper was originally scheduled to launch on the 2nd SLS mission in and despite a 2 year schedule delay, SLS development has been so slow that NASA no longer has a spare launch vehicle until at least the lunar landing of Artemis 3. This means that the launch could happen no earlier than , and since the spacecraft will be ready for launch in October 2024, this could add another in storage costs.
Ironically, the only advantage of the SLS was a direct trajectory that should have allowed the flight to be shortened to . But the delays mean that Falcon Heavy will be able to deliver Europa Clipper to the Jupiter system in , while SLS no earlier than May 2031. And all the launch-related costs would have been at least $3,464M to NASA instead of the $178M they would pay SpaceX.
Medium-term perspective
The Artemis program is estimated at in 2012-2025, which is nearly a third of NASA's budget over that period. Almost 60% of that comes from SLS/Orion, which is by NASA senior officials and the inspector general as "unaffordable" and "unsustainable". And reading this story, you can guess why.
NASA's current total investment in commercial space is of the total budget, or even less than the average investment in SLS/Orion. For that, commercial space already provides all of NASA's transportation to the ISS starting in 2020 while SLS/Orion sits waiting for the opportunity to send 4 astronauts to the middle of nowhere where they will transfer to a commercial lunar lander.
Someday NASA may even build a Gateway space station there to justify the existence of SLS/Orion just like Congress tried with the Europa Clipper. It will be 3-4 times more expensive to build and maintain than a station in low Earth orbit with the "advantages" of rare flybys 15 times farther from the Moon than the Apollo missions and double the crew's exposure to radiation from galactic cosmic rays.
People often ask why there is so much hatred for SLS and I want to answer from my perspective: where you see a cool big rocket, I see lost opportunities. Imagine what commercial space could do with the current level of investment a decade ago and twice that now. We would certainly have a commercial station to replace the ISS by now and NASA would have freed up a lot of money for a truly sustainable lunar program that would make final preparations for Mars.
Instead, we are now doubting whether Artemis program will be sustainable at all. If SLS/Orion continues to eat up most of the Artemis budget long enough, NASA will not have the funds to develop equipment for lunar surface operations and without new achievements this program risks being canceled just like Apollo.
NASA has already taken steps on this path with the commercial HLS and CLPS programs. All that remains for Congress and NASA to do now is cancel the welfare programs for Boeing, Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman shareholders and invest this money in companies that are willing to put also their own money on the line into making the programs as fast and cheap as possible. Whether we will boldly go down this path or stumble in the middle remains to be seen.
-
Welcome to r/SpaceX, the premier SpaceX discussion community and the largest fan-run board on the American aerospace company SpaceX. We recommend using r/SpaceX with Old Reddit. This board is not an official outlet for SpaceX information.
members -
Welcome to r/SpaceXLounge, the sister subreddit to r/SpaceX, and a place for relaxed and laid-back discussion. We recommend Old Reddit with r/SpaceXLounge. This subreddit is not an official outlet for SpaceX information.
members -
We are not SpaceX, we are Space-X. We are a group that is trying to get rid of Outerspace. We hate space. Join us. We want to fill in outerspace or something.
members -
Share & discuss informative content on: * Astrophysics * Cosmology * Space Exploration * Planetary Science * Astrobiology
members -
r/Starlink is for news, media, and discussions related to Starlink, the SpaceX satellite internet constellation. This is a fan-run Subreddit. For official news and to sign up for service, visit starlink.com
members -
News on SpaceX's Starship and Superheavy architecture currently in development! This is a fan run site.
members -
Subreddit dedicated to the news and discussions about the creation and use of technology and its surrounding issues.
members -
a subreddit all about space travel (NASA, Roscosmos, SpaceX, ULA, Boeing, Rocket Lab, etc.). To infinity and beyond!
members -
members -
A subreddit devoted to the field of Future(s) Studies and evidence-based speculation about the development of humanity, technology, and civilization. -------- You can also find us in the fediverse at - https://futurology.today
members -
/r/Starlink_Support is for questions about the Starlink satellite constellation. General Starlink news, media, and discussions should be posted to /r/Starlink. All other SpaceX content should be posted to /r/SpaceXLounge. Visit Starlink.com to sign up. Reminder: This is a fan-run subreddit. It is not an official Starlink website. For official Starlink news and information, please visit Starlink.com
members -
The most amazing place on reddit! A subreddit for sharing, discussing, hoarding and wow'ing about Dogecoins. The much wow innovative crypto-currency.
members -
The Kerbal Space Program subreddit. For all your gaming related, space exploration needs. http://kerbalspaceprogram.com
members -
The place for news articles about current events in the United States and the rest of the world. Discuss it all here.
members -
r/NASA is for anything related to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration; the latest news, events, current and future missions, and more.
members -
The Mars Society is the world's largest and most influential space advocacy organization dedicated to the human exploration and settlement of the planet Mars. Established by Dr. Robert Zubrin and others in 1998, the group works to educate the public, the media and the government on the benefits of exploring Mars and creating a permanent human presence on the Red Planet.
members -
Welcome to the official subreddit for Spaceflight Simulator, a game about exploring our local space with rockets you build!
members -
The original and largest Tesla community on Reddit! An unofficial forum of owners and enthusiasts. See r/TeslaLounge for relaxed posting, and user experiences! Tesla Inc. is an energy + technology company originally from California and currently headquartered in Austin, Texas. Their mission is to accelerate the world's transition to sustainable energy. They produce vertically integrated electric vehicles, batteries, solar, and AI software and hardware solutions.
members -
Memes! A way of describing cultural information being shared. An element of a culture or system of behavior that may be considered to be passed from one individual to another by nongenetic means, especially imitation.
members -
The goal of /r/tech is to provide a space dedicated to the intelligent discussion of innovations and changes to technology in our ever changing world. We focus on high quality news articles about technology and informative and thought provoking self posts.
members -
Welcome to the subreddit of the xSpace Community. After being apparently abandoned by the original developers in April 2021, the community is currently taking over the project to bring to you new services. Our aim is to make the crypto space a safer place by providing you analysis and insurance in your investments. xSpace, the token to be crypto safe.
members