×
all 105 comments

[–]AutoModerator[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Hi AnImA0. Your submission contains a /s/ reddit shortlink which may cause an issue to some users viewing this thread via mobile app. To everyone else visiting this thread... It might not be obvious, but when people submit content to /r/bestof, they arent screened for quality. That's your job as redditors. You need to upvote good quality content that matches the flavor of the subreddit, and downvote content that doesnt meet that standard. If the content is particularly bad, feel free to report by hitting the report button under the title of the post, or whereever your app hides that functionality.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]_Z_E_R_O 433 points434 points  (58 children)

I feel like the comment beneath that one is the real gem. Parents are so burned out, overworked, underpaid, and stressed, we're basically in survival mode all the time. We're so disconnected from anything meaningful that we've forgotten what it's like to have a relaxing, stress-free day. This isn't a parent problem, it's a society problem. I want to be there for my kids, but half the time I'm too just damn tired.

My dad's parents both worked too, but the difference was they had grandparents who watched him and his sisters several times a week, and a vibrant community where everyone walked to each other's houses. Their family didn't have to stagger their work schedules and juggle paid childcare like we do. That's the new reality - kids who barely know their own family and hardly ever see their neighbors. The only stuff for kids to do now is paid, structured activities that require a parent to be on-site and cost a small fortune. If you want to take the kids out for a fun day somewhere, no matter how small, prepare to pay $20 per hour per child. People complain about ipad kids, but the real issue is vanishing third spaces where people can just exist without paying for it or being aggressively advertised to.

The nuclear family social experiment has been an abysmal failure. We all moved halfway across the country for our jobs, we don't have a community, we have no free time, and we're drowning financially.

[–]princess-smartypants 165 points166 points  (13 children)

Not the main point of your comment, I know, but I work in a public library. We have programs for kids, families, and adults, free. We have drop in crafts, play spaces, quiet study spaces, all free. We love it when parents bring their kids and just let them play. Bonus, the books and other things you can borrow are all free, too.

[–]Jonathan_the_Nerd 66 points67 points  (0 children)

When I was a very small child, my mom would bring me to storytime at the library. I barely remember it anymore, but I remember that I enjoyed it. When I got older, I loved checking out books and reading them. I especially loved the Choose Your Own Adventure books. During summer vacation in upper elementary school, I would checkout an armload of books from the adult section (no, not that adult section!) and finish them all before they were due. I don't spend much time at the library anymore now that I have the Internet and Kindle Unlimited, but I still have fond memories of it. Thank you for working in the library and providing such a wonderful space for everyone.

[–]dasnoob 42 points43 points  (3 children)

Ah yes, the public library where at least here closes at 4pm well before most people get off work.

Here in Arkansas the programs in the public library are almost exclusively geared for homeschool kids and happen in the middle of the work day.

[–]ttoasty 23 points24 points  (1 child)

Maybe in rural areas, but that's not really true in suburban/urban areas like Fayetteville, Bentonville, Little Rock, Ft. Smith.

Although, there is an active effort amongst Republicans to defend and dismantle public libraries in the state, so things aren't looking great for the near future.

[–]altodor 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I'm in a suburb in NYS. My local Library closes at 6PM. I get off of work at 5:30. It's a 10 minute drive.

Even as a single childless adult I can't really make that work. I've only ever gone there to vote and get a library card.

[–]Polkawillneverdie17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://cals.org/cals-main-library

Central Arkansas Library System in Little Rock is open 9-6 Mon-Sat

I checked the website and it looks like there are plenty of adult programs from writers workshops book clubs, tech classes, ceramics classes, movie screenings, etc. Many are at satellites locations that are open after 6.

[–]Gigglemonstah 18 points19 points  (0 children)

My local library has all of these things..... ....at like, 10:30am and 2:30pm on Tuesdays and Thursdays.

That doesn't really work when both me & my spouse work 9-5's M-F, y'know? And whenever I bring up "hey, it'd be great if y'all had these resources available between, idk, 6-7pm on weeknights, or on the weekends!" I get met with...blank stares. It's so disappointing. I remember going to the library so often as a kid but it actually seems like the number of "schedule-accessible" activities has decreased during my lifetime. :(

[–]Polkawillneverdie17 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My partner is a Youth Librarian (and I've been a volunteer at multiple libraries since 2004). There are storyline, programs, classes, and events 7 days a week. There's so much they offer families and in our area, people really take advantage of it (in a good way) and you can tell just how much everyone loves and appreciates the library.

It's really one of the only thriving third spaces left.

Support your public library!

[–]BroughtBagLunchSmart 37 points38 points  (14 children)

Parents are burned out because they are working too much, kids are dumb because the algorithm ruined their attention span, teachers are underpaid and don't care anymore. Seems like the economic system we built our society on might be the problem. Nothing will change because Democrats will never admit our version of capitalism is a problem and Republicans will complain about some of the symptoms of capitalism but blame it on wokeness and their hog voters will eat it up.

[–]BlackNova169 77 points78 points  (9 children)

Here in Minnesota Democrats got full control of the state government for the first time in a long while. One example law they passed was making school lunch free to all children.

https://www.mprnews.org/story/2023/03/17/gov-signs-universal-school-meals-bill-into-law

Republicans were opposed to it.

“I have yet to meet a person in Minnesota that is hungry,” Republican state Sen. Steve Drazkowski.

Democrats aren't perfect but I will definitely take incremental improvement from Democrats over Republicans who actively promote hate against children. Both sides are not the problem here.

[–]AnOnlineHandle 40 points41 points  (3 children)

Nothing will change because Democrats will never admit our version of capitalism is a problem

Joe Biden tried to tell a group of rich people that they needed to be taxed more, and tried to get them to understand that it won't impact their lives in any real way, telling them that nothing would fundamentally change.

Media owned by a few billionaires who love Republican tax cuts and social media (likely encourage), cherrypicked the 'nothing will fundamentally change' part out of context and ran a campaign claiming that Biden promised the rich that nothing would change and trying to discourage people voting for him.

What Democrats seek to do, and what those with a voice in this world choose to represent them as seeking to do, are two different things.

Now there's people like you saying don't bother to vote, both sides are the same (while Republican voters will be told the opposite message, go out and vote at all costs), exactly as they tried to achieve.

[–]DastardlyBoosh 27 points28 points  (0 children)

This. The comment linked isnt beatof, it's just distracted. Even the OP basically admitted their entire rant should have been aimed against capitalism, not tiktok and tired parents.

But then doubled down on reddit about how social media is bad

[–]dasnoob 21 points22 points  (2 children)

You are right. Me and my wife do our best to spend time with our kids and do things and we are constantly fucking exhausted because of it. We basically get 30 minutes a day to ourselves. It fucking sucks and I hate it for our kids.

[–]ididntseeitcoming 13 points14 points  (1 child)

Man. I feel this. I work roughly 12 hour days (thanks army) and by the time I get home I’m so fucking drained that I can hardly even process information. My wife is exhausted because she’s been mom all day. My kids want attention, talk about school, play, and spend time with each other.

I try to show interest. I actively listen. Help with homework. But my biggest fear is they can tell… that I’m tired. I’m beyond exhausted. And they’ll think that’s how life is supposed to be. That’s their future. What a future to look forward to.

So the OP linked in best of can go fuck him/herself. “Be better parents” yeah sure. We could all do better. But I’m hanging on by a fucking thread that’s frayed as shit.

[–]KingGilgamesh1979 16 points17 points  (1 child)

Have you read Bowling Alone? It's about the breakdown in social connectedness in the United States. Obviously he doesn't look just at bowling, but PTA, churches, civic organizations, etc.

[–]JamboreeStevens 15 points16 points  (2 children)

I'm 100% of the mindset that things like daycare and preschool should be socially funded and/or subsidized programs.

[–]the_Elders 19 points20 points  (1 child)

Education is literally the most important thing we can give children and our society is failing so many people right now. Teacher salaries should be doubled, school should be year round, childcare and education should be "free" from 3 months to 25 years, breakfast and lunch should be provided to all who want it.

The book Consequences of Capitalism by Noam Chomsky and Marv Waterstone spell out exactly where society is headed currently, and a lot of people are going to be angry about that future, and many of them will not know who to be angry at. It is not a future I look forward to and we are doing it to make a few people extra rich.

Some of you reading this might be inclined to ask who is going to pay for this??? We are all going to pay one way or another.

[–]JamboreeStevens 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yup. Either raise taxes slightly or watch society slowly devolve into... whatever we have now.

Actually, we wouldn't really even have to raise personal income taxes at a state or federal level if we raised corporate taxes and eliminated the workarounds they have to avoid taxes.

[–]Dark_Knight7096 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I feel like the comment beneath that one is the real gem. Parents are so burned out, overworked, underpaid, and stressed, we're basically in survival mode all the time. We're so disconnected from anything meaningful that we've forgotten what it's like to have a relaxing, stress-free day. This isn't a parent problem, it's a society problem. I want to be there for my kids, but half the time I'm too just damn tired.

This is what got me too. I don't have kids yet, might never idk, but I'm just so exhausted. I'm perpetually tired and annoyed and just fucking empty man. When I get home from work I just want to do nothing. I get annoyed when someone calls me or texts me with something I have to respond to. Something needs to change. The job I currently have, 20 years ago, the salary was something I looked at as the ultimate goal. "Man if I ever have a job making X, I'll finally have made it!" Now, here I am, and the only reason I can afford a house is because I bought it during the last crash, when I REALLY couldn't afford it, and it's in rough condition and needs SO much work. Which is also a source of stress, but can't fix it because IDK anything about fixing houses because the last generation who mocks my generation for not knowing anything didn't teach me anything. And I can't hire people because everything is so damn expensive. So that's just another source of stress that should be my sanctuary from it.

It's almost as if society has been designed to keep you stressed out, on edge, and incapable of devoting lots of time and energy into things...

[–]CrotchetyHamster 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm not a parent - and part of why is that I don't feel like I can reasonably raise a kid in this world, even as someone quite privileged (currently out of work, but I've been in high-paying tech industry jobs for the past decade - and even a substantial paycut would still have me well above median salary where I live). Just work and walking the dog is enough stress, I can hardly imagine having a kid.

Hillary Clinton said it takes a village, right? Well, when community is so broken down that nobody even feels they have community, how is that supposed to work?

[–]key_lime_pie 4 points5 points  (3 children)

I normally find David Brooks to be insufferable, but he did write an incredible piece for The Atlantic entitled "The Nuclear Family was a Mistake." That's probably paywalled,

[–]DrSpray 5 points6 points  (2 children)

Don't really want to hear about problems with the nuclear family from a guy who cheated on his wife with one of his grad students lol

[–]jmlinden7 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I mean he seems opposed to the concept so at least he's being consistent?

[–]thatnameagain 3 points4 points  (8 children)

You’re not describing anything that was different from the 80s / 90s. Grandparents still exist. Yes the third space is disappearing but this is an issue for adult-oriented spaces. Kids spaces are parks and playgrounds and they still exist and are free. People are working the same amount of hours they used to.

https://clockify.me/working-hours

The nuclear family was at its absolute height during everyone’s favorite “golden era” of working class affordability in the US, 1955-1970. None of these are the reason.

The issue is communications technology and how it has ironically created more disconnection from the people physically close to us by making it easier to connect with people far away from us. That and the greater proliferation of high quality home entertainment systems. It’s like junk food socialization. Our impulses to communicate on social media and elsewhere dominate our actions but we still feel lonely and disconnected because we are from people around us.

I think there has developed a growing sense of embarrassment about in person, socialization on our kids behalf. “Let’s go on a fishing trip with our neighbors“ or let’s invite kids from class over for a movie night“ I think is seen a little more “corny“ than it used to be. It’s a subtle thing, but I think this is a self reinforcing symptom

We have just as much leeway and wherewithal to connect in person as we used to. We are simply choosing not to, being fooled into thinking it’s not worthwhile by distractions of technology.

[–]AquaStarRedHeart 6 points7 points  (5 children)

Grandparents still exist? I'm gonna tell you, Boomers as Facebook grandparents is a real thing on the Internet for a very good reason. I know so many parents who spent solid amounts of time with their grandparents as kids, giving their parents chances to recharge and reconnect, and now are faced with their parents as absolutely checked out "grandparents" who come around a few times to get pics for Facebook but do not actively encourage relationships with their grandchildren. It is a serious issue for millennial parents.

[–]thatnameagain -3 points-2 points  (4 children)

Sounds pretty anecdotal to me. But assuming its true as an actual societal trend, it sounds like the reasons for it are the exact ones that I pointed out.

[–]CanneloniCanoe 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Nah, it's a thing for a lot of reasons.

For one, people are working longer before retiring. My dads in his mid-60s and he plans to keep working 50+ hour weeks for another 5 years or so because he can't afford to retire yet, he's not a childcare plan.

People have been having kids later over the last couple generations too. My grandmother was in her 40s when her first grandkids were born because she started popping kids out by 19, she was fine to run around after youngins. But my parents were 30 and I was 27, that math doesn't work as well. My MiL didn't trust herself alone with a baby because her health didn't allow her to carry him up and down stairs or pick him up from the floor for diaper changes, she needed at least one other adult around until he was about school age. My mom developed serious health issues before I was even out of high school and couldn't be trusted alone with him for a whole bunch of reasons. Also not childcare.

You have to actually live near your parents for them to be that involved, and that's not always an option with the job market being what it is. Maybe you can find a sustaining job in your hometown, or your hometown happens to be a decent economic center, but probably you have to seek in a wider radius. I'm about to have to. My job refuses to even keep up with inflation and there's nothing else for me here; in the next year or so I have to either get real lucky with a fully remote job or move a minimum of an hour away. So, no more childcare for me. Shit.

And then, aside from all the practical issues, you've got the subset of grandparents who choose not to deal with the kids on a regular basis "because they raised their kids already," or refuse to update with current safety standards "because you turned out just fine," or are mean bastards in ways a lot of today's parents just aren't willing to sacrifice their minds and kids to anymore.

Add it all up and you've got a hefty chunk people who can't, won't, or shouldn't be active grandparents. Sure, maybe disconnection and technology is a big factor for the community at large, but the issue of specifically family and grandparent support has its own set of big problems putting extra pressure on parents.

[–]thatnameagain -1 points0 points  (2 children)

You have a good point about people retiring a little later than they used to, but I don’t think that’s a big enough factor to be major issue in kids not socializing. All the other factors you mentioned here are not new. So sure, I think grandparents are probably a little less available than they used to be, but the change is just not significant enough to count for the societal shift. The change in technology use, however, is.

[–]AquaStarRedHeart 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Social media vs actual involvement as public currency is absolutely new. If you don't know, you just don't know.

[–]thatnameagain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s what I just said

[–]_Z_E_R_O 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Grandparents still exist.

My kids see their grandparents twice per year. They have a good relationship, but a distant one. The Boomer grandparent stereotype is real.

Yes the third space is disappearing but this is an issue for adult-oriented spaces. Kids spaces are parks and playgrounds and they still exist and are free.

Not really. There aren't as many playgrounds as there used to be, and many of the free ones are crappy, old, and unsafe because they haven't been updated since the 90s. Fast food restaurants are getting rid of play areas, and all the new fancy playgrounds are indoors and cost money to use. Parks are still around, but that's only an option if the weather is good. Up here that's only 4-6 months of the year.

My kids' favorite playground charges admission - $15 per child.

People are working the same amount of hours they used to.

HAHAHAHA bud. No. Almost no families have a stay-at-home parent anymore, and even if they do, it's only on paper. Gig work, freelance, and getting paid under the table is way up.

[–]thatnameagain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What you’re saying seems pretty anecdotal. It’s definitely not my experience with playgrounds. Though I suppose it depends where you’re living. I’ve never had trouble finding one and if anything playgrounds have been annoyingly updated with more plastic stuff than they used to be in the 90s.

I’ve never heard of the boomer stereotype of grandparents being disinterested more so than previous generations. It’s not really an issue with anybody I know who has kids. If there’s some measurable trend there, I’m open to hearing it.

A playground that charges admission is a private play place company, yeah, obviously your kids will like the larger more expensive stuff. I think it’s unlikely that there are no public playgrounds near you.

I showed my source for the working hours Info. You can laugh it off, but unless you’re going to post actual stats, I see no reason to take your word for it against the data.

[–]Malphos101 73 points74 points  (10 children)

Ah yes another "This generation really has an attitude and respect problem, unlike the generations before" post.

The REAL problem with education in the US is the constant defunding and attacks on education by the GQP. This isnt a "both sides" or "non-political" issue, this isn't a "kids just arent respectful enough today" issue, this isnt a "tablets destroyed kids" issue.

[–]Jonathan_the_Nerd 30 points31 points  (1 child)

Even the best school system can't fix a kid whose parents won't put in the time and effort to be parents.

[–]halfhalfnhalf 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Hard to do that when you have to work three jobs to make rent.

[–]Muscled_Daddy 9 points10 points  (2 children)

That is a very garbage read of the comment.

[–]wakladorf 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Right. Op spends a lot of time blaming people when it is so clearly a societal issue.

But also relevant xkcd

[–]tagrav 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I wouldn’t even necessarily plant it on a specific party but the whole nation.

We have allowed ourselves to change our opinion of education from being an investment into our nation and our national security and now we view it as an expense and drain

[–]Malphos101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh goody another "both sides are the same" moron.

Its like seeing a real life person who says "Well just because the arsonist poured gasoline everywhere and lit a match doesnt mean its not also equally the homeowners fault for leaving their newspapers on the floor! Both people are at fault here!"

[–]IICVX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this isnt a "tablets destroyed kids" issue.

One thing that's really struck me as a parent of a two year old is that the tablet isn't the be-all and end-all of entertainment for the kid. Sure, it's pretty high up there, but my kid will frequently choose to play with other toys despite having free access to the iPad.

[–]headykruger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve noticed a lot of “the sky is falling” attitudes in teacher subs. I’m not saying they are dramatic but there are a lot of posts like this.

[–]paxinfernum 50 points51 points  (3 children)

Speaking as a former teacher, I think smartphones are a canard. Most research showing lower attention spans is from tracking people while they are using a computer or device. Yes, we all context switch a lot while on devices. If the school were allowed to restrict cellphones, students would be forced to focus.

The larger issue that I saw was how much cheating has massively been normalized among students. I had classes where nearly 80% of the students would turn in obviously plagiarized work, and this was before ChatGPT. The internet has made cheating easy, and kids have no shame about doing it, even otherwise fairly good kids will do it.

The problem with cheating isn't just that it's unethical. It's that every time you cheat, you're hurting yourself. Cheat on 3 assignments in a row, and you are behind in the skills and knowledge you need. So then you don't know what you need to know to move forward, which leads to cheating on the new assignments, and once you've cheated your way through a whole grade level, you're pretty much trapped. The effects snowball.

From a former teacher's perspective, cheating was so pervasive that most of the teachers I knew just threw their hands up in the air and pretended they didn't see it. Sending every student to the office was infeasible. You do that too much, and even the best principal will be overwhelmed and start claiming it's your fault.

You can't call that many parents. It takes too much time, and when you do, they mouth something about how they will do something, but the kid just comes back in and attempts to cheat the next day. That's assuming they don't call you a liar. Remember, if the kid is cheating in every class and you're the only teacher trying to address the issue, mom and dad's reaction is that you must be the bad teacher. After all, they're doing fine in everyone else's class. /s This applies temporally as well. If the kid cheated all last year and got a good grade, and they get in your class, where they are suddenly failing, guess who the bad teacher is? Not the one who didn't catch them cheating all last year.

The problem is pervasive, and no one has the guts to address it. Covid just made it worse because it was easier to cheat in an online environment.

[–]kataskopo 5 points6 points  (2 children)

A ton of people cheated in my university back in the early 2010s, but the good teachers would always know because when you actually quized them on their knowledge, they would crumble.

So the teachers would give specific assignments or projects, and ask specific questions that would weed them out.

Like, he would ask them why did they call this variable this way, or why did this circuit was done in this manner, and you'd see them stumble and stutter immediately, and that's how you knew.

Tldr: more focus on actual discussion and conversation, less on homework or assignments.

[–]paxinfernum 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Dude, that was Uni. In high school, I couldn't drop a kid's grade unless I could absolutely prove they cheated on that particular assignment. Asking them follow-up questions isn't going to do anything. They'll just say they knew it when they did the assignment, and mom and dad will believe them. No admin is going to risk the wrath of parents unless you've got proof, and no, you can't get rid of cheating simply by changing the assignments. Kids have a million ways to cheat. There also simply isn't enough time in the school day for us to even ask one substantive question of each student. That's just another thing to pile on teachers.

What needs to happen is routine audits by people who aren't teachers, people who have time to go through and check for cheating and call parents and set up appointments. Teachers are already worked to the bone.

[–]gentlemantroglodyte 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is this an indicator that take-home assignments/tests are no longer viable? 

It seems like a lot of "find the cheater" effort could be avoided by just making them do the work in an environment where they can't cheat. Which does seem like it would have its own issues, (like with how much time it would take) but if the other option is to argue with parents ineffectually....

[–]mojitz 22 points23 points  (2 children)

I'm always extremely skeptical of any explanation of anything that ultimately boils down to, "It's a culture problem." Yes, culture is typically a factor in some fashion, but I find it's most often better thought of as a proximate — rather than root — cause since culture is itself to a very large degree a product of underlying material conditions. Change a country's overall wealth and how it is distributed throughout society, change what types of industries it is based in, change its type of government, change... any number of things and the people living in that society will respond by adopting different norms, attitudes and behaviors. Hell, they'll even produce different types of art.

So yes, in a certain sense this person is right, but what they've identified as the principal issue is downstream of the real problem. This is actually something they get very close to identifying earlier when they point to how "the algorithm" is completely fucking us up. Well, the next question has to be "where did that come from?". Culture certainly didn't produce it. I would contend that it is a product of an economic system that prioritizes and rewards profit maximization to the exclusion of virtually all other concerns — and we can place a whole host of other problems at the feet of that issue as well, from the destruction of walkable communities serviced by mass transit (and the myriad issues that stem from that), to the the climate change crisis over which we seem to have no control (and the myriad issues that stem from that ) and about a million other things spiraling outward in a growing web of dire consequences.

[–]thatnameagain 2 points3 points  (1 child)

All culture problems have material roots. The material root of this cultural problem is communications, technology, cell phones, social media, and the way they have subtly changed how we approach socialization.

[–]mojitz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, and it's worth noting that this too is ultimately heavily influenced by the economic model. The fact that these tools have been controlled for the most part by capitalists has certainly colored the nature of their impact on the world.

[–]TJ_McWeaksauce 20 points21 points  (5 children)

There's no books in their homes, there's no reading in their homes, they don't play games together. Videos games yes, but nothing with math skills. No dice, no cards, no socialization.

I work in the video game industry, plus I've been a lifelong gamer, so I take exception to this comment. Video games encourage interest in math and socialization.

If you go to any subreddit or forum dedicated to specific games, you'll often see a lot of discussion about math and general theory crafting. What will increase my overall DPS more, a 2% increase to fire-based damage-over-time, or a 0.5% increase to global crit chance? What's the best healer build for this RPG? What's the current metagame for this deckbuilder? In the WWE 2K games, does a wrestler's numerical rating actually have a mechanic effect, or is it just for show? Etc.

Video games are loaded with numbers, especially statistics, and a lot of players love to theory craft around these numbers. For example, I just checked out the World of Warcraft subreddit, r/wow, and on the front page there's this class analysis post that's loaded with graphs. That thing is a rabbit hole of number analysis with links to even more number analysis. And the comments are filled with people participating in the analysis.

Which leads me to socialization: you can definitely socialize through video games. The most successful video games out there are all multiplayer games, if not massively multiplayer games like World of Warcraft. Yes, you can play those games solo, but they are best enjoyed when you play with friends. Online socialization is still socialization. And as the WoW subreddit and other game forums show, players love talking with each other about the games they play.

Video games are still games, so they come with the same benefits as any other game, including the ability to foster interest in math and socialization.

[–]pcrnt8 4 points5 points  (2 children)

I learned to type from OSRS, long before the GE existed. Turns out typing "selling 3mil lobbies, 200ea" as fast as possible and as many times as possible was a pretty good typing exercise.

[–]TJ_McWeaksauce 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I learned how to type quickly by playing an old, text-based game called TimeQuest. It's like the classic Zork games, where you have to type out every single action you want to do. "Look into tree stump." "Go west." "Ask Julius Ceasar about Colosseum." That sort of thing.

It probably took me at least 10 hours to beat that game. Ten hours of typing every single action taught me how to type fast.

[–]holyone666 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't forget prefacing all that with color:red wave:2. You need to really catch their attention when yelling into varrock streets.

[–]Reagalan 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Hear hear!

The tired old trope of "phone bad" is completely unsupported by evidence, and the ongoing trend toward "game bad" is just as lacking in fundamentals. These reactive and regressive stances toward tech reek of luddism and laziness, and I pay them no respect.

The problem isn't "declining attention spans," it's that much education still uses old methods to teach an ever-larger and more complex corpus of information. There's little-to-no immediate feedback, very few reinforcement mechanisms, low emotionality, and, depending on the whims of authorities, the stick is often used to motivate more than the carrot. This flies in the face of all of psychology; rewards are ten times more effective than punishments, emotional investment aids in memory consolidation, and immediate feedback establishes action loops and keeps attention.

Furthermore, some subjects simply aren't well-suited to a classroom environment, or can be done more effectively in a simulated one. Those requiring a special perspective, as in the roles of leaders or politicians, simply cannot be learned through books or video; they must be experienced. Some things just click best when played.

Gamification of education is not only necessary, but our collective failure to do so is a root cause of all of these problems.

[–]ThankeeSai 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Video games have put me ahead in my career from day one. I'm an architect. 3d modeling was easy to pick up. I learn new software twice as fast as my colleagues. I find objects on screen within a second while everyone is still trying to find their mouse pointer. I can navigate/walk through a model with no trouble. Years of constant communication within games, whether by text or voice, made the Covid WFH transition a joke while people were whining over Zoom.

[–]SoundHole[🍰] 18 points19 points  (1 child)

I love how everyone just ignores No Child Left Behind, signed by Shrub, which tied funding to standardized testing.

Responsible school districts and admins will do anything they can to guarantee funding, which often means streamlining schools and turning them into diploma mills. The idea that threatening funding over testing would somehow 'fix' education was Conservative horseshit just like everything else they spew out of their dumb faces.

So congratulations, you all got what you wanted and now you bitch and moan and blame parents, teachers and, best of all, the kids themselves for yet another failure stemming from ignorant Boomer shortsightedness.

[–]Lame-Duck 4 points5 points  (0 children)

My boomer aunt, who was an educator during that time, had a hearing in front of a legislative committee arguing against no child left behind here in FL. Ultimately she was ignored but fought the good fight nonetheless. Some boomers saw this coming, we just stopped listening to the people who know what they're talking about a long time ago.

[–]kingoftheplastics 12 points13 points  (4 children)

As a parent to a 3.5yo my question isn’t “why can’t kids read” but “how do I teach my kid to read.” We read bedtime stories every night, I point out the words, we’ve done phonics to an extent (eg she knows the letters and what sounds they make) and she can recite one of her nursery rhyme books but she’s not “reading” it per se. From what I remember/was told I could read more or less independently by age 4 and this is what my parents did to get me there so it’s hard to not ask myself what more I’m missing here and I imagine a lot of parents feel the same way.

[–]Beat_the_Deadites 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Keep on it, she'll pick it up. You've still got a year or two before most kids figure out the basics. Her brain is growing exponentially, she'll be reading the books herself before you know it. I do suggest keeping her screen time very limited though.

We read voraciously with our kids from the time they were 6 months old, ABC books, Sandra Boynton board books, Goodnight Moon, all the way through the Harry Potter series as they got into middle school. Now they're plowing through Brandon Sanderson and JRR Tolkien on their own.

[–]kingoftheplastics 2 points3 points  (1 child)

The screen time is a struggle admittedly, more so in the winter months when “let’s go play outside” isn’t a viable option throughout the day. She watches movies, PBS stuff that’s on Netflix, and cocomelon (which I despise for many reasons but her daycare has gotten her hooked and I’ve yielded that battle to avoid an avoidable tantrum) but we engage with toys and activities throughout the day so she’s not just glued to the screen for hours on end.

[–]Beat_the_Deadites 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure you'll be fine. I take it she's your first/oldest?

We're going on 15 years since we started the journey, had all the concerns, poured a lot of effort and anxiety into getting the kids into a good routine, and it snowballs. It's like compound interest. My 6th grader has a big project due next week, and he knew he had a lot of other stuff going on starting last night. So this past Monday (Presidents day, off school) he took it on himself to log into his Google classroom, find his homework assignments for the week for his other classes, and got started on them early so he wouldn't be crunched for time Sunday-Monday.

All while trouble-shooting his 3D printer and re-playing Breath of the Wild. My daughter's the same way - by getting proficient at reading and understanding the world around them, it frees up time to do the fun stuff too.

Little Blue Truck, Goodnight Goodnight Construction Site, and If I Built a House were also favorites to mix it up a little with the princesses and superheroes.

[–]showell14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Taught my kids with Dick and Jane just like my mother taught me

[–]halfhalfnhalf 10 points11 points  (1 child)

Uh huh it's smart phones and lazy parents and not that the government has been dismantling public education for the past forty years.

Right.

[–]ThankeeSai 2 points3 points  (0 children)

All of the above really.

[–]Farmerdrew 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think we also need to take into account just how much more kids need to learn by 8th grade. I feel like they try to squeeze a lot more into their brains than when I went to school.

[–]vettehp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Grandkids are homeschooled and couldn'd be doing better, daughter joined a facebook group with a diverse group of parents that are very involved in their childrens education, they go on a wide range of field trips and educational activities, museums, planetariums, various types of farms animal and fruit, outdoor parks, yet to turn 7, can already spell and read, can do math in his head, Done right, home schooling is the way to go. Lives in WVA, they just passed a bill that teachers can carry a gun in class, WTH

[–]h3fabio 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jack of Spades, not Rick.

[–]DaenerysTargaryen69 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm confused.
Isn't /r/bestof supposed to link to a great reddit (series of) comment(s)?