Top.Mail.Ru
? ?

Previous Entry | Next Entry

OK, some of you who are new to the blog may not realize this, and yesterday's entry may have come as an unwelcome surprise to you. See that "Warning: Sanity Hazard: Contains Forbidden Lore" icon? I mean it. I in fact have another icon that I use for when I'm being playful and/or referring to fictional "forbidden lore." When I post something that I know that some people on the Internet just plain do not want to know, and that others may not want to read before breakfast or let their kids see, I use this icon. And the subject of today's entries (and probably tomorrow's, or if not then one not long after that) is one that two centuries' worth of American teachers, editors, parents' groups, politicians, and even professional historians, think that you have no business being interested in. "Boost, don't knock." When studied beyond what they tell you in high school, American history can be a very depressing subject, one that can make it hard for you to remember that other countries have done as bad, and usually worse. That's one reason you aren't supposed to want to know this stuff; it might make you less likely to work for and fight for your country, when needed. Another reason is that most people think that none of this stuff is anything you can do anything about anyway, so why get yourself depressed over nothing? As you might guess, I usually disagree with this analysis.

That being said, if you're thinking of using what I've written here to prove how morally superior the people are where you live, compared to the multi-generational evil of us St. Louisans? You're a fool. Your home town is no better. You just don't know.

Local reporters are doing their job amazingly well, and so the details about Cookie Thornton's suicide terrorist attack on the Kirkwood City Hall continue to come out at a very encouraging rate. See St. Louis Post-Dispatch: "Anatomy of a Rampage" (PDF), "Charles Thornton: The legal battles." Former Riverfront Times reporter Randall Roberts, "My Conversation with Charles 'Cookie' Thornton." And one that says about half of what I intend to say when I cover this in more depth tomorrow or the next day, Riverfront Times STLog: "Charles 'Cookie' Thornton: Meacham Park Boils Over." So I think this is the most important thing I can add to the conversation at this point: I can put it in the broader context of history, of US history, Kirkwood history, and Meacham Park history. Then, while we wait to see exactly when Cookie Thornton opened his paving business, and wait to hear why the city singled him out for enforcement of an ordinance that is not enforced against almost any other building contractor, and certainly not in so draconian a fashion and with a total refusal to negotiate, you'll understand why even before I heard the word "Kirkwood" attached to this story I knew that someone from Meacham Park had done it.

Kirkwood, Missouri, has several odd historical claims to fame. The oldest of them is the most fascinating one. Kirkwood, Missouri is the world's first intentional "edge city." Like a lot of St. Louis County, it started out its life as a couple of farms and a market, dating back to homesteads first colonized who-knows-when, barely after the Indian Wars had ended in the area. It may not have even had a name; at the time, most Missouri market towns didn't. The city of Kirkwood as we know it happened when a clever railroad engineer named James Kirkwood bought it all up, because he'd figured out a pretty reliable way to get rich. Worked, too. See, here's what James Kirkwood knew: "decent, proper" people all over the world, and in all times, hate big cities. It shows up in sermons from Hesiod's Works and Days to the New England "divines," in folk tales from Scotland to Baghdad, in songs from Homeric odes to World War I era pop music, in dramatic fiction from Aristophanes to film noir. "Everybody knows" that decent, honest, pious, honorable people live on farms. "Everybody knows" that nobody lives in big cities, at least not intentionally, except for corrupt politicians and other thieves, perverted "artists" and other prostitutes, greedy "priests" and other beggars. "Everybody knows" that decent, honest, pious, honorable folk treat the big city as a necessary and dangerous evil, a place to leave for in the morning, do whatever business you have to do, but make absolutely sure that you're safe at home on the farm in the country before nightfall, before the worst of the corruption can infect you.

But in early industrial America, at the beginning of the urbanization, that became logistically dicey. Rich people carved out their own gated enclaves and posted private armies, but the upper middle class and the middle class had nothing. So here's what James Kirkwood did, in 1853: he surveyed the rural area out past the extreme edges of St. Louis, looking for a tiny little farmer's market crossroad. But he needed not just any crossroad; he needed one where the geography was favorable to rail. He wanted a solid-rock ridge line all the way from downtown St. Louis to that intersection, or as near to one as could be found. When he found one, he bought it all up, secured the railroad right of way along that ridge line, and raised the financing to build a rail line out to his newly founded "rural town" of Kirkwood, Missouri. And he marketed the lots there to, and only allowed to move in, the white upper middle class and middle class from St. Louis. That way they not only paid him for their houses, recouping a big chunk of the cost of the rail line, but they paid him every day so that they could ride his train into their jobs in the city, and ride the train back out to their "rural" house, where they kept their families safe from urban perversion and corruption and sickness, being back there in safety themselves by nightfall, or at least by full dark.

It was so obviously brilliant that everybody copied it. Look at a modern-day map of the St. Louis metropolitan area, Missouri side. Come in just a few miles from what is now Interstate 270, to US Highway 67, which is mostly called Lindbergh Boulevard here. Except, not coincidentally, for the stretch of it that is still called Kirkwood Road. What US67, aka Lindbergh, aka Kirkwood Road, is, is the road that used to connect all of those train stations. Every single major suburban town along that stretch of road, from Florissant down to Kirkwood, is centered on one of them. It was an attempt to build one big long ring of lily-white upper middle class and middle class exurbs: no rich people would want to live there, no working class people or poor people or dark-skinned people or (for the longest time) Irish allowed. But none of them was as successful as the first of them, Kirkwood. That's why to this day, the people of Kirkwood cling like mad to that commuter rail station, preserve it at all costs, and keep it as the logo of their community.

Fast forward to 1892. That's when Memphis real estate developer Elzy Meacham, for no reason recorded to history, came up to St. Louis, went out just past Kirkwood, bought up those farms, and founded the all-black settlement of Meacham Park. But it's really not that mysterious. Go look at the article I wrote yesterday about lynching. Now look up the original street names in Meacham Park. It's pretty obvious what Elzy Meacham was thinking. He and his customers were thinking that it would never be safe for black people to live anywhere where the local mayor, and/or the chief of police, and/or the local minister, and/or the municipal judge were white. So he went out to maximum practical business commuting range of what was at the time one of America's farthest west large cities, grabbed some land, and set up a town where black men could raise their families, comfortable in the knowledge that if they built a home, or a farm, or a business, and if they and their families invested money and labor in them, that they would not have it taken away from them by a mob with a noose and various implements of torture, a mob that usually didn't even realize that they were being played by corrupt white officials.

But there was a flaw in that plan, one that may not have been obvious to him. From the country's founding as British colonies in the 1620s up until the year 1888, no African American had ever been given a banking license. Nor were very many given after that. And those African Americans who did get banking licenses have had them yanked away from them, en masse, by corrupt white governments at every opportunity. Without a broad network of black-owned banks, there was no way for an all-black city in the United States to thrive without going hat-in-hand to white banks, and submitting themselves to white city governments and courts. Meacham Park chose to do without. Well, it wasn't entirely a free choice. Nobody in Meacham Park was ever going to get a banking license, and no white bank wants to do business of any kind in an all-black neighborhood. (Still.) Now, it's possible to live without banking. But it's impossible for an economy to thrive without some way for people to pool their savings for investment purposes, for people to take out loans to open or improve businesses, for local craftsmen and businessmen to transfer money to suppliers outside the area and for customers outside the area to transfer money in. So while Kirkwood thrived, Meacham Park stayed, for all practical purposes, trapped in the 1880s. But there are worse fates; they could have been lynched and the survivors run out of the area at gunpoint. And some people are perfectly comfortable with an 1880s standard of living, or else nobody'd still be living in the mountains of Appalachia, the plains of Kansas, or the Louisiana bayou.

Even before Elzy Meacham came to town, the city of St. Louis had been bringing freed slaves up from the rural south to work in St. Louis's factories. But initially, except for the people who bought into Meacham Park, almost none of them were allowed to live on the St. Louis side of the river. They were told that there was no housing available for them at any price on this side of the river, and "encouraged" to settle on the other side of the Eads Bridge, in East St. Louis, Illinois. But that quickly became impractical. Fortunately, James Kirkwood's experiment had accidentally shown the way out of this dilemma. Kirkwood didn't buy into this idea, much, but all of the suburbs north of Kirkwood, the ones that were unsuccessfully trying to copy James Kirkwood's formula, revamped themselves as working class communities. Then the city of St. Louis not-to-gently encouraged the entire working class population of the north half of St. Louis to evacuate to north and northwest county, to make room for all-black tenements. To this very day, if you're black, and you want to live in a neighborhood that happens to be less than 10% black, good luck getting a realtor anywhere near St. Louis to show you a house, or a landlord to admit that there are any apartments for lease. The federal government and private charities have spent thirty years suing realtors and landlords over this, but to this day, St. Louis is near the top of the list of the most segregated cities in America, only barely less segregated than Johannesburg under apartheid. (Reminder: ABC PrimeTime Live's famous and award-winning 1991 news special "True Colors" was shot in St. Louis.)

But population distribution started to change incredibly rapidly, starting when the Supreme Court handed down their famous ruling in the case of Brown v Board of Education, and accelerating like an out of control wildfire after the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 put the first real teeth into anti-bigotry law. This set off a wave of mass panic flight, as those all-white working class suburbs were forced to accept black Americans into their neighborhoods and their schools. There's a magic number at which the average American concludes that an area is "all black," around 10%. So as one by one, those neighborhoods passed about 5% to 7% black, each suburb evacuated to the safety of across the county line into what was, throughout the 1970s and 1980s, the fastest-growing county in the United States, St. Charles County. Then the federal government got serious about enforcing anti-discrimination law in St. Charles County, which is now up to almost 3% black. And instantly, population growth in St. Charles ground to a halt, and now poor-white-trash Jefferson County is growing as fast as St. Charles County used to be, proving that once they're faced with the prospect of letting more than one black kid into their kid's school, there are thousands of St. Louisans (maybe tens of thousands) who'd rather live in the area that contains about a quarter of the methamphetamine labs in Missouri, maybe around 5% of all the meth labs in the world. They'd rather live next door to a world-famously toxic lead smelter, because they're less worried about what that would do to their property values than to have more than one black family living within half a mile of them.

But almost all of this passed Kirkwood by, thanks to its initial concentration on only allowing in the upper middle and middle class. There simply was no place within Kirkwood city limits to build any affordable housing, and housing turnover in Kirkwood has always been slow. People who grow up in Kirkwood (proper) love it there, with few exceptions. In interviews with TV reporters over the last couple of days, some have gone as far as to compare it to the legendary perfect kingdom of Camelot. Because black America gets its accumulated savings cheated out of it every 20 to 30 years, very few black people could afford to live in Kirkwood, even once the realtors were forced to show them houses there; so few that Kirkwood stayed well over 95% white. And almost all of this passed Meacham Park by, too, even as the rest of the county expanded right around them, because, well, it was Meacham Park: nobody cared about the suburb that time forgot. And that's where things stood, right up until 1990 -- when today's troubles began.

Comments

( 34 comments — Leave a comment )
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
flewellyn
Feb. 10th, 2008 09:53 am (UTC)
I confess, I just don't understand the mindset that keeps these people fleeing from black people. I just don't get it.

Oh, and regarding this:

Because black America gets its accumulated savings cheated out of it every 20 to 30 years

Do you have a link to the post where you laid this pattern out? I can't remember where it was.
bradhicks
Feb. 10th, 2008 10:01 am (UTC)
That was an easy test of my Google-fu: Google "black history site:bradhicks.livejournal.com". "The Disconnect between Andrew and Katrina (for Black History Month)," 2/17/07.
(no subject) - flewellyn - Feb. 10th, 2008 10:12 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - bradhicks - Feb. 10th, 2008 10:26 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - pope_guilty - Feb. 10th, 2008 08:42 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - idonotlikepeas - Feb. 11th, 2008 08:06 am (UTC) - Expand
professor
Feb. 10th, 2008 10:01 am (UTC)
Another reason is that most people think that none of this stuff is anything you can do anything about anyway, so why get yourself depressed over nothing? As you might guess, I usually disagree with this analysis.

So then tell us, what is it that we can do to fix these problems that you highlight in your blog? What specific action can I take?
bradhicks
Feb. 10th, 2008 10:04 am (UTC)
1) Never give up. There may in fact not be a solution. But if you stop looking, I guarantee that none will be found.

2) When you catch people blaming black Americans for the problems of black America, educate them. Right now, even people who think that they're not racist are afraid that there's something demonstrably inferior about black Americans, especially black men, that its black men's own fault that bad things happen to them. That ignorance is what feeds the fear.

3) Campaign and vote for politicians with a deep and abiding commitment to the American Dream. Make sure that those Americans know, or learn, the history of how black men have been cheated out of that dream over and over again. Hold their feet to the fire, every primary election, over whether or not they're doing something about it.
(no subject) - kimchalister - Feb. 10th, 2008 06:11 pm (UTC) - Expand
crasch
Feb. 10th, 2008 12:02 pm (UTC)
While I don't doubt that racism plays a part in the segregation of St. Louis, you don't need to posit racist beliefs in order for such segregation to emerge. You need only posit that blacks want to live in neighborhoods where there is at least one other black family (and vice versa). Check out this article by Rauch:

http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200204/rauch

Edited at 2008-02-10 01:56 pm (UTC)
kallisti
Feb. 10th, 2008 12:23 pm (UTC)
Geepers, and I thought that Charlotte, NC was segregated! It's not even close! It's because of that I think that if Obama is the Democratic choice, they Democrats will *loose* to McCain because of the large amount of underlaying racism that there is in the US.

ttyl
nancylebov
Feb. 10th, 2008 01:12 pm (UTC)
I've eaten in restaurants where the pattern was white customers, black waitstaff, and a light-skinned black person to show customers to their tables. It was someplace in my convention-going travels. Might it have been St. Louis?
valarltd
Feb. 10th, 2008 07:01 pm (UTC)
Could be anywhere in the South actually. it's a common pattern in Little Rock, Shreveport, Memphis and Nashville too.
(no subject) - kukla_tko42 - Feb. 10th, 2008 10:09 pm (UTC) - Expand
nancylebov
Feb. 10th, 2008 01:26 pm (UTC)
Have you done a history of black banks in the US? If not, I think it would be a great topic.
bradhicks
Feb. 10th, 2008 08:07 pm (UTC)
I'm not an expert on the subject. Other than what I googled up for this article, what I remembered was from a single newspaper article back during the Savings and Loan crisis, when somebody pointed out the pattern that black-owned banks were being closed down and liquidated by the government for violations less severe and more purely technical than the ones for which white-owned banks were being bailed out. That author put it in the context of a long history of such behavior by the government.
fallen_x_ashes
Feb. 10th, 2008 01:57 pm (UTC)
This is absolutely fascinating and I can't wait to read the next part.
galbinus_caeli
Feb. 10th, 2008 02:31 pm (UTC)
The Kirkwood pattern that you describe (Rural town grows up near big city to let people live outside the big city) has also been played out in reverse in at least two places, Georgia and Colorado. Both times in the towns that I live(d) in (but long before my time, of course).

As the railroads were coming to Colorado in a major way, there were two important cities right near each other and on opposite sides of the pass that the trains would need to take to get over the Rockies. Boulder, and Golden. Both of these were wealthy from mining. The East-West railroad line that basically follows I-70 today and the North-South line that follows I-25 today were going to cross somewhere in the area.

Because neither Golden nor Boulder wanted the horrors of urban life (not blacks so much as cowboys, and probably "Mexicans") that were sure to grow around such a crossroads they pushed the crossroads a few miles out into the plains. Where Denver grew up.

Later when it became time to pick a capital for the new state of Colorado Boulder and Golden both fought one of the dirtiest elections possible. Graveyard voters, ballot theft, violent suppression of opposing voters. As a result, neither of them became the capital, and it ended up in dirty Denver.

Georgia had a similar situation, though a bit earlier, when the railroads came through. No one in Decatur wanted the nasty railyard that was going to grow up at the cross between a Savannah to Memphis line and a Virgina to Birmingham line. So they pushed it a few miles west and the scrappy market town of Atlanta was born.

I suspect that the same sort of thing has played out elsewhere.
nancylebov
Feb. 10th, 2008 05:00 pm (UTC)
Here's somewhat about the history of black land ownership in the US. Here's the money quote: "At the turn of the century blacks owned between 12-15 million acres of land; by the 30s and 40s that number shrinks to just a little over a million."

The pressure against black banks was done through regulation. Do you have any ideas about what can keep regulation from being used that way?
bradhicks
Feb. 10th, 2008 08:09 pm (UTC)
Cure the voters of wanting it that way, get it through to the voters how insanely dangerous and expensive that is. Because as long as the majority of the voters want it that way, that's how it's going to be.
(no subject) - nancylebov - Feb. 11th, 2008 02:42 pm (UTC) - Expand
pope_guilty
Feb. 10th, 2008 08:43 pm (UTC)
Remind me of why you're not writing professionally?

'cause I mean, and I wouldn't say this about most of the stuff I read, I would totally pay to read your writing.
bradhicks
Feb. 10th, 2008 10:01 pm (UTC)
Because what I'm at my best at is essays, a seriously over-saturated market.
(no subject) - pope_guilty - Feb. 10th, 2008 10:05 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - bradhicks - Feb. 10th, 2008 10:11 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - pope_guilty - Feb. 10th, 2008 10:12 pm (UTC) - Expand
pentane
Feb. 11th, 2008 02:49 pm (UTC)
Building on a previous post of yours, it's a good thing you're next to Arkansas, or you'd never have anyone to make fun of.

What an exciting state.
cos
Feb. 11th, 2008 05:11 pm (UTC)
edge cities
This is just a nitpick, it doesn't affect the rest of what you're saying, but I think you're misusing the term "edge city". Edge Cities in Garreau's coinage are concentrations of work space, plus the retail & housing to support them, that arise naturally at the intersections of existing major roads & railroads near a big city. While the traditional suburb was a bedroom community, housing for people who work in the city but prefer to commute to somewhere "nicer" where they have more personal space and live with people like themselves, Edge Cities take the commute away from the city. They are places where people work, in spread out office parks with lots of space, without ever having to go into the dense urban big city.

Kirkwood, as you describe it, is the concentrated essence of "traditional suburb" bedroom community. Not an Edge City even by the longest possible stretch.
(Anonymous)
Mar. 5th, 2008 09:14 pm (UTC)
Kirkwood used Meacham Park from way back
Kirkwood High grad many years ago. I live in rural Illinois now. No, I don't think I was trying to get away from the blacks by moving here. After college, I interviewed with Montgomery Ward in Chicago one Friday afternoon, but I drank with my friends at lunch, and I didn't get hired. Maybe I wouldn't have been hired anyway. But sober works a lot better in an interview.
Got a job in the country and way leads on to way. At least it's different here than the uniformity of the suburbs.
After a recent local village board meeting where the mayor referred to Kirkwood, I spent some minutes explaining to a civil engineer how Meacham Park residents had worked in the homes of the original Kirkwood residents. Not slaves but pseudo-slaves.
Don't forget first jobs--first job interviews--have a great impact on the typical person's lifetime earnings. Yes there are remarkable exceptions, but generally, it's a hard climb upward.
The Kirkwood shooting is so horrible it's hard to say anything at all about it. I'm sorry--and sorry that someone was apparently careless with a promise of significant concrete work to Cookie Thornton--so easy to have such a promise cross your lips. Individuals often can't speak for city governments. Was it the final straw? I don't know.
(Anonymous)
May. 3rd, 2010 09:34 pm (UTC)
i grew up in meacham park and kirkwood. were the original street names different than what they are now? what was he trying to say with the street names?
(Anonymous)
Sep. 26th, 2010 11:15 pm (UTC)
I just moved out of meacham park last year after living there for 4 yrs. and I am now a junior in high school. the one thing that I always realized about kirkwood was that they never really consider meacham park part of their town. They made us feel isolated all the time. Meacham park was the police's stomping grown and they made it known... I always felt like a bug under a microscope when I lived there. Don't get me wrong I love the people there I just think our voices are never heard.
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
( 34 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

November 2012
S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Comments

  • 9 May 2021, 20:35
    Mindy's is nothing but an extremely thinly disguised Lindy's, which is opened by Leo Lindemann in 1921, and is on Broadway between 49th and 50th where the Manhattan branch of Junior's is today (both…
  • 8 Dec 2020, 03:28
    Depends what type of MUT 21 Coins you happen to be looking for. StubHub/Madden 21 Coinsmaster, and so on all frequently make use of the similar network of resell MUT 21 Coins. You will get pretty…
  • (Anonymous)
    29 Jul 2020, 11:18
    Have any of the people here ever been kidnapped, rapped repeatedly, then strangled? Oh, and at the age of 11 by a total strangled triple your weight and with a gun? Have any of you ever dealt with…
  • (Anonymous)
    3 Apr 2020, 02:42
    Cookie Thornton was harassed not because he was black they went after him cause they had the power to do so. These little assholes get a little authority and they just push it and push it. I dont…
  • bradhicks
    3 Jan 2020, 11:12
    Sure there's a trick to it, but one working at that. After all, it all leads up to the feeling of satisfaction for the players, so means are justified here. Personally, love guys who put in extra…
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lilia Ahner