Top.Mail.Ru
? ?
 
 
05 February 2003 @ 01:14 pm
O'Reilly transcript  
Seeing as, as far as I can tell, Fox charges for transcripts, I thought I'd post an independent full transcript of Bill O'Reilly pulling off the mask and showing the slimy lizard-man beneath as he tells a guest to ... well, you'll see. It's worth noting that when he came back from commercial break, he apologized for the behavior of the guest. He showed far too much decorum for Fox, most likely.

O'REILLY: In the "Personal Stories" segment tonight, we were surprised to find out than an American who lost his father in the World Trade Center attack had signed an anti-war advertisement that accused the USA itself of terrorism.
The offending passage read, "We too watched with shock the horrific events of September 11... we too mourned the thousands of innocent dead and shook our heads at the terrible scenes of carnage -- even as we recalled similar scenes in Baghdad, Panama City, and a generation ago, Vietnam."
With us now is Jeremy Glick, whose father, Barry, was a Port Authority worker at the Trade Center. Mr. Glick is a co-author of the book "Another World is Possible."
I'm surprised you signed this. You were the only one of all of the families who signed... JEREMY GLICK, FATHER DIED IN WORLD TRADE CENTER: Well, actually, that's not true.
O'REILLY: Who signed the advertisement?
GLICK: Peaceful Tomorrow, which represents 9/11 families, were also involved.
O'REILLY: Hold it, hold it, hold it, Jeremy. You're the only one who signed this advertisement.
GLICK: As an individual.
O'REILLY: Yes, as -- with your name. You were the only one. I was surprised, and the reason I was surprised is that this ad equates the United States with the terrorists. And I was offended by that.
GLICK: Well, you say -- I remember earlier you said it was a moral equivalency, and it's actually a material equivalency.
And just to back up for a second about your surprise, I'm actually shocked that you're surprised.
If you think about it, our current president, who I feel and many feel is in this position illegitimately by neglecting the voices of Afro- Americans in the Florida coup, which, actually, somebody got impeached for during the Reconstruction period --
Our current president now inherited a legacy from his father and inherited a political legacy that's responsible for training militarily, economically, and situating geopolitically the parties involved in the alleged assassination and the murder of my father and countless of thousands of others.
So I don't see why it's surprising...
O'REILLY: All right. Now let me stop you here. So...
GLICK: ... for you to think that I would come back and want to support...
O'REILLY: It is surprising, and I'll tell you why. I'll tell you why it's surprising.
GLICK: ... escalating...
O'REILLY: You are mouthing a far left position that is a marginal position in this society, which you're entitled to.
GLICK: It's marginal -- right.
O'REILLY: You're entitled to it, all right, but you're -- you see, even -- I'm sure your beliefs are sincere, but what upsets me is I don't think your father would be approving of this.
GLICK: Well, actually, my father thought that Bush's presidency was illegitimate.
O'REILLY: Maybe he did, but...
GLICK: I also didn't think that Bush...
O'REILLY: ... I don't think he'd be equating this country as a terrorist nation as you are.
GLICK: Well, I wasn't saying that it was necessarily like that.
O'REILLY: Yes, you are. You signed...
GLICK: What I'm saying is...
O'REILLY: ... this, and that absolutely said that.
GLICK: ... is that in -- six months before the Soviet invasion in Afghanistan, starting in the Carter administration and continuing and escalating while Bush's father was head of the CIA, we recruited a hundred thousand radical mujahadeens to combat a democratic government in Afghanistan, the Turaki government.
O'REILLY: All right. I don't want to...
GLICK: Maybe...
O'REILLY: I don't want to debate world politics with you.
GLICK: Well, why not? This is about world politics.
O'REILLY: Because, No. 1, I don't really care what you think.
GLICK: Well, OK.
O'REILLY: You're -- I want to...
GLICK: But you do care because you...
O'REILLY: No, no. Look...
GLICK: The reason why you care is because you evoke 9/11...
O'REILLY: Here's why I care.
GLICK: ... to rationalize...
O'REILLY: Here's why I care...
GLICK: Let me finish. You evoke 9/11 to rationalize everything from domestic plunder to imperialistic aggression worldwide.
O'REILLY: OK. That's a bunch...
GLICK: You evoke sympathy with the 9/11 families.
O'REILLY: That's a bunch of crap. I've done more for the 9/11 families by their own admission -- I've done more for them than you will ever hope to do.
GLICK: OK.
O'REILLY: So you keep your mouth shut when you sit here exploiting those people.
GLICK: Well, you're not representing me. You're not representing me.
O'REILLY: And I'd never represent you. You know why?
GLICK: Why?
O'REILLY: Because you have a warped view of this world and a warped view of this country.
GLICK: Well, explain that. Let me give you an example of a parallel...
O'REILLY: No, I'm not going to debate this with you, all right.
GLICK: Well, let me give you an example of parallel experience. On September 14...
O'REILLY: No, no. Here's -- here's the...
GLICK: On September 14...
O'REILLY: Here's the record.
GLICK: OK.
O'REILLY: All right. You didn't support the action against Afghanistan to remove the Taliban. You were against it, OK.
GLICK: Why would I want to brutalize and further punish the people in Afghanistan...
O'REILLY: Who killed your father!
GLICK: The people in Afghanistan...
O'REILLY: Who killed your father.
GLICK: ... didn't kill my father.
O'REILLY: Sure they did. The al Qaeda people were trained there.
GLICK: The al Qaeda people? What about the Afghan people?
O'REILLY: See, I'm more angry about it than you are!
GLICK: So what about George Bush?
O'REILLY: What about George Bush? He had nothing to do with it.
GLICK: The director -- senior as director of the CIA.
O'REILLY: He had nothing to do with it.
GLICK: So the people that trained a hundred thousand Mujahadeen who were...
O'REILLY: Man, I hope your mom isn't watching this.
GLICK: Well, I hope she is.
O'REILLY: I hope your mother is not watching this because you -- that's it. I'm not going to say anymore.
GLICK: OK.
O'REILLY: In respect for your father...
GLICK: On September 14, do you want to know what I'm doing?
O'REILLY: Shut up. Shut up.
GLICK: Oh, please don't tell me to shut up.
O'REILLY: As respect -- as respect -- in respect for your father, who was a Port Authority worker, a fine American, who got killed unnecessarily by barbarians...
GLICK: By radical extremists who were trained by this government...
O'REILLY: Out of respect for him...
GLICK: ... not the people of America.
O'REILLY: ... I'm not going to...
GLICK: ... The people of the ruling class, the small minority.
O'REILLY: Cut his mic. I'm not going to dress you down anymore, out of respect for your father.
We will be back in a moment with more of THE FACTOR.
GLICK: That means we're done?
O'REILLY: We're done.

Here's the sickening apology quote (which lead into a whitewash of fellow excement Jerry Thacker): "I have to apologize. If I knew that guy, Jeremy Glick, was going to be like that, I never would have brought him in here, and I feel bad for his family. I really do. "
 
 
Current Mood: disgusted
 
 
 
ayelienneayelienne on February 5th, 2003 11:20 am (UTC)
Thanks for sharing that.

This is exactly why FoxNews is persona non grata at our house - i get apoplectic when i watch it.

Can you actually see the jackboots they're wearing when you watch?
Seize the fish: politicalcarpeicthus on February 5th, 2003 11:25 am (UTC)
The big desks hide them well.
(Deleted comment)
(Anonymous) on May 15th, 2006 07:53 pm (UTC)
Grow up.
Confessions of a Strange Loopwebbob on February 6th, 2003 09:19 am (UTC)
What's not so obvious from the transcript is that Glick stays calm and unflapped throughout. Quite an accomplishment -- I just wish he'd been able to say, "I knew my father, you didn't. It's an insult to his memory that you would use him to try to keep his son from speaking from his heart."
Seize the fish: thoughtfulcarpeicthus on February 6th, 2003 06:07 pm (UTC)

It seemed he was calm, from "please don't say that" and the like. The guy must be a Zen master.
(Anonymous) on February 6th, 2003 01:02 pm (UTC)
wow, Glick was smoking. so poised.. The riled one was a blabbering idiot. it was delicious.
THATthat on February 6th, 2003 04:58 pm (UTC)
Fox scrapes the paint off the basement floor
Wow. That was truly hard to read. The muscles in my neck got all tense. I never watch Fox news, so I had no idea just how bad TV "journalism" could be. Who, being in a position to give that asshole a show, actually did so? I guess he's no worse than Limbaugh, but I've been hoping against hope that Rush was an anomaly and we wouldn't see more like him in the big media outlets.
Seize the fish: BRAINS!carpeicthus on February 6th, 2003 06:03 pm (UTC)
Re: Fox scrapes the paint off the basement floor
Unfortunately Rush is far from an anomaly. Ideologues and hacks make horrible people, but they're quite entertaining for people who like to watch car wrecks. Nice username, btw.
Re: Fox scrapes the paint off the basement floor - (Anonymous) on March 15th, 2004 08:55 am (UTC) (Expand)
(Anonymous) on February 6th, 2003 06:39 pm (UTC)
Man, I would have blown my cool all over the place and jumped over his desk and strangled him. It would have been much more nasty.
Seize the fish: sillycarpeicthus on February 6th, 2003 06:43 pm (UTC)
That's good television, too.
(Anonymous) on February 9th, 2003 04:33 pm (UTC)
It didn't end when the mic was cut. read on
2-6-03: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly Threatens Physical Assault On and Ejects a 9/11 Family Member From His Show

On February 4th, during a live interview on the Fox News program “The O’Reilly Factor,” media personality Bill O’Reilly verbally attacked Jeremy M. Glick, a signer of the Not In Our Name “Statement of Conscience” whose father was killed in the World Trade Center on 9/11. Bill O’Reilly has referred to the signers of the Statement as “anti-American” and has said they should be “held accountable” for the expression of their dissenting opinion. After cutting short the interview Bill O’Reilly threatened Mr. Glick, a professor at Rutgers University and teacher in the state prisons system, with physical violence.

The following day, Bill O’Reilly continued his attacks on Mr. Glick by falsely claiming that Mr. Glick “was out of control and spewing hatred.” The transcript from “The O’Reilly Factor” itself shows that these statements are wrong. What Mr. Glick said was “Why would I want to further brutalize and punish the people of Afghanistan…” “The people of Afghanistan … didn’t kill my father,” and the CIA “…that trained a hundred thousand Mujahedeen” bore some responsibility. Mr. Glick remained calm, focused and dignified throughout the entire show. The video shows it was Bill O’Reilly that lost his composure. After the interview he told Mr. Glick to “Get out, get out of my studio before I tear you to f**king pieces!”

Mr. Glick was invited to the Fox News show after the January 27th appearance of Miles Solay, a NION Project spokesperson. Solay’s interview was prompted by that day’s publication in the New York Times of the Statement of Conscience, which has been signed by over 50,000 Americans, including Howard Zinn, Susan Sarandon, Edward Asner, Martin Sheen and Cornel West, to name a few noteworthy signers. The Statement, which Le Monde called the “sacred text of the anti-war movement,” has been published in over 40 journals and newspapers across the US, and 7 countries internationally.

On the 1/27 show, Bill O’Reilly challenged Mr. Solay that “Nobody signed this from September 11th.” Mr. Solay pointed out that Jeremy M. Glick, among others who had suffered family loss on 9/11, had signed the Statement. Mr. Glick accepted an invitation to the show to explain why he had signed a document that reads in part: “We believe that people of conscience must take responsibility for what their own governments do.” During the interview Mr. Glick endured verbal barrages like, “…I don’t really care what you think,” “…so you keep you mouth shut,” and “Shut up. Shut up. Shut up.”

Bill O’Reilly’s “literal ’cutting’ of Mr. Glick’s speech is consistent with the current administration’s ‘watch what you say’ policy of intimidation,” says an organizer with the Not In Our Name Project (NION). The NION Project, an effort that shares the politics of the Statement of Conscience, is organizing mass resistance against the government’s global war campaign, attacks on civil liberties, and detentions and roundups of immigrants. The group has turned out hundreds of thousands of people around the world since October 6, 2002 to protest and take the “Pledge of Resistance,” which includes: “We pledge alliance with those who have come under attack for voicing opposition to the war…” NION plans to actively participate in the worldwide protests against the war on February 15th, in New York City.

Despite his recent statements such as “I like a robust debate” and “dissent is good,” Bill O’Reilly’s verbal attacks and abrupt ending of the program by cutting off Mr. Glick’s microphone demonstrated otherwise. Several members of the show’s staff apologized to Mr. Glick, and expressed concern for his personal safety, stating that there might be a “situation” if he and the host were to meet face to face. A NION organizer stated, “We stand with Mr. Glick in fighting the encroaching climate of hostility toward people who oppose ‘a war that will last a generation’. This is an example of a political attempt to terrorize dissent.”

(Anonymous) on February 13th, 2003 08:14 am (UTC)
Re: It didn't end when the mic was cut. read on
What's the problem? We all know that the news cock-suckers who dish out that kind of shit don't care what we think and don't care about the truth. This prostitute is in the pay of big media and would kill his mother or sell his grandmother to a cannibal tribe if his boss said to. Bush is the same and a psychpath who should be in jail.
Re: It didn't end when the mic was cut. read on - (Anonymous) on August 9th, 2004 10:52 am (UTC) (Expand)
Re: It didn't end when the mic was cut. read on - carpeicthus on August 9th, 2004 11:22 am (UTC) (Expand)
Re: It didn't end when the mic was cut. read on - (Anonymous) on May 25th, 2006 08:38 pm (UTC) (Expand)
Re: It didn't end when the mic was cut. read on - (Anonymous) on May 15th, 2006 07:45 pm (UTC) (Expand)
jsangsparjsangspar on February 14th, 2003 05:10 am (UTC)
Glick was being an infuriating, rhetoric-spouting nut. O'Reilly handled it pretty well; I probably would have slugged him halfway through.
Seize the fishcarpeicthus on February 14th, 2003 06:38 am (UTC)

I by no means agree with the guy's political priorities, but slugging a guy you've invited to speak is best in a bar or a prison cell. If O'Reilly were in either one of those instead of on his own show, he can be as boorish as he wants. It would have been very easy to shut this guy down in a debate without using cheap tricks, but that would go against the grain.

And where's the equal opportunity for the extreme? This guy's just some dude who signed a petition. He's no danger to America. Immediately after this Bill slobbered all over Jerry Thacker, a total whacko who has political power and was about to get a high-ranking government job.

Bill did threaten Glick with physical violence after the show, btw. Not exactly the high road.
Clarify, please. - (Anonymous) on February 14th, 2003 03:19 pm (UTC) (Expand)
(Anonymous) on February 16th, 2003 02:40 pm (UTC)

I've actually met O'Reilly 10 years ago. He often blows up like this when confronted with real facts.
(Anonymous) on February 17th, 2003 04:57 am (UTC)
Hi from norway!
Just wanted to say that it is a relief to know that not all americans are as crazy as your president :) It kinda gives me hope :)

Good luck to all of you, hope you won't be pulled into a war against your will! Just remember that whatever the media tell you; the rest of the world does NOT hate you, and we ARE grateful for your help in the WW's.

PS: No wonder germany is leading the way for a peaceful solution - few countries have experienced the devastation of war as well as them.
Seize the fish: happycarpeicthus on February 17th, 2003 12:32 pm (UTC)
Re: Hi from norway!
Not only are not all Americans as nutty as Bush, most Americans -- even most voters -- didn't vote for him. Glad to see that not everyone impugns the whole nation for the small cadre of those with outsized power leading it down the wrong path.
Re: Hi from norway! - (Anonymous) on February 18th, 2003 01:38 am (UTC) (Expand)
Jay Smithzebrapix on October 18th, 2003 05:08 am (UTC)
Thanks for posting that transcript. It's always good to show the world what kind of pathetic, bullying, stillborn intellect O'Reilly really is.
Seize the fish: BRAINS!carpeicthus on October 18th, 2003 08:37 am (UTC)
No problem. He continues to lie about Glick to this very day, in fact.
(Anonymous) on November 21st, 2003 12:10 am (UTC)
Sad
Sad that those that cannot protect themselves cast stones at those who will.
(Deleted comment)
Seize the fishcarpeicthus on March 14th, 2004 09:05 pm (UTC)
Glick has a book now? I had no idea.
(Anonymous) on March 15th, 2004 05:15 pm (UTC)
O'Reilly is probably just hemmhoraging
O'reilly is probably just hemmhoraging from the fact that he will be getting his but kicked on a daily basis come March 31st when Liberal radio comes to America and the net. I can't wait to see how this effects all conservative radio, when many people realize they just liked to have a voice in the background and that a Liberal voice is much nicer to listen to than these lying, crouchy conservative meanies!

Gremlin-
(Anonymous) on February 2nd, 2005 05:45 am (UTC)
Re: O'Reilly is probably just hemmhoraging
Hey, how is that liberal radio doing anyway? Check the ratings my friend.

Referring to the Glick interview:

In a span of two minutes, Glick had

... referred to the Florida election as a "coup";

... he called September 11 an "alleged" assassination and murder;

... he falsely accused Bush the elder of training 100,000 moujahadeen while head of the CIA;

... and then attacked the personal integrity of the host.

If anything, O’Reilly was simply unprepared to handle such an insane barrage of utter lunacy.

глюкiosaur de champlainchaizzilla on March 15th, 2004 10:28 pm (UTC)
GLICK: ... is that in -- six months before the Soviet invasion in Afghanistan, starting in the Carter administration and continuing and escalating while Bush's father was head of the CIA, we recruited a hundred thousand radical mujahadeens to combat a democratic government in Afghanistan, the Turaki government.

zooop... i missed this the first time i read it.. small thing but i guess it proves o'reilly doesn't know fuck or he could have jumped on this minor detail. i'm sure glick just biffed the sequence coz he was live & not reading from cards, but..
Seize the fishcarpeicthus on March 15th, 2004 10:33 pm (UTC)
I assure you O'Reilly doesn't know enough to call people on mistakes that must be countered with polysyllabic words.
(no subject) - chaizzilla on March 15th, 2004 10:43 pm (UTC) (Expand)