Sunday, January 14, 2024

Sunday Reading

You Keep Using That Word — Charlie Pierce on Trump’s “hostages.”

One of the more odious developments of this election cycle, about to kick off for real in the quadrennial useless bungle in Iowa, is the determination of some in the Republican Party to hijack the language and baptize the January 6 insurrectionist criminals as “hostages.” This process is led, of course, by Fulton County (Ga.) Inmate No. P01135809, who has continued to ladle on the whitewash. From NBC News:

Trump brought up the rioters who attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6 who remain in prison, many who pled guilty or were convicted by a jury and sentenced to serve time behind bars. Trump called them “hostages” and called on Biden to release them from federal prison. “They ought to release the J6 hostages. They’ve suffered,” Trump said, using the abbreviation for Jan. 6. “I call them hostages. Some people call them prisoners. I call them hostages. Release the J6 hostages Joe. Release them Joe. You can do it real easy, Joe.” Trump has suggested that if returned to the White House he would pardon those who have been charged in connection with the riot.

To be fair, much of the GOP seems to be wary of this particular linguistic legerdemain, at least publicly. From The Hill:

“I don’t condone that characterization at all, no,” said Senate Republican Whip John Thune (S.D.) when asked about Trump calling Jan. 6-related convicts hostages.“We got a justice system and they’re working through it,” Thune said of the nearly 900 people convicted of Jan. 6-related crimes, including more than 200 people who have pleaded guilty to felonies. Sen. John Cornyn (Texas), a member of the Senate Republican leadership team, dismissed Trump’s claim — echoed by some other Republicans — that individuals who were convicted of destroying property or assaulting police officers in the Capitol are “hostages.”

“Somebody who’s been duly convicted of a federal crime is not a hostage,” he said.

Asked about the third anniversary of Jan. 6 and the characterization of people convicted of storming and damaging the Capitol as “hostages,” Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) told reporters that he stands by the remarks he made at the end of Trump’s second impeachment trial when he denounced the former president and the “criminals” who “were carrying his banners, hanging his flags and screaming their loyalty to him…Let me say this about Jan. 6: I’ve had remarks that I made on Feb. 13 of ’21 about how I felt about Jan. 6. I recently reread it, I stand by what I said,” McConnell said.

Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) balked at the notion that people convicted of Jan. 6 crimes are somehow hostages or political prisoners. “That’s like calling drug traffickers unlicensed pharmacists. At the end of the day, they’re J6 convicts to me,” he said.

Good line, Thom. Take a rim shot into retirement with you.

“If they were proven guilty in a court of law of a crime, it is what it is,” he said. “Are there some people that were swept up in it? Yeah, but use better judgment. If you were only accidently [sic] in the Capitol, you probably didn’t get convicted. If you hurt a police officer, you should have been convicted. If you broke anything on the Capitol, you should have been convicted. You should serve your time. Period, end of story. “That’s not a hostage,” he added. “We have hostages held by Hamas right now. I have a different standard for what I consider hostages.”

Who knows whether this all will last beyond the spring. The GOP follow-through on condemnations regarding January 6 has not been stout. But we take our spasms of common sense from these people as we get them.

Doonesbury — It’s gonna cost…

Saturday, January 13, 2024

Friday, January 12, 2024

Happy Friday

It’s Art Deco Weekend on Miami Beach, and the weather looks like it’s going to rain.  But the party — including the car shows Saturday and Sunday — go on rain or shine.  So I’ll be there.

This picture is from 2019 when it was raining as we set up, the rain squall giving the scene and the Pontiac an Edward Hopper kind of feel.

Meanwhile, the revelations about former M-DCPS school board member Lubby Navarro’s spending habits are getting more detailed and weirder, including 56 lemon pies and a “Pirate Vixen” adult Halloween costume.  (“Yo, ho…”)  Then there’s this…

In November 2022, Miami-Dade School Board vice chair Lubby Navarro made a strange purchase with her school district-issued credit card: Two silicone and cotton fake pregnancy bellies from Amazon that she used to try and convince her ex-boyfriend she was carrying his baby, according to state investigators and prosecutors.

She likely knew where to find him, because earlier that year she used the same credit card to buy two Apple AirTag tracking devices that were later found attached with duct tape to the underside of her ex-boyfriend’s car, the investigators say. One was near a wheel. The other, under the front grill.

Hey, whatever floats your boat, but not with District funds.

Thursday, January 11, 2024

Florida Grift Part Infinity

From the Miami Herald:

Former Miami-Dade School Board member Lubby Navarro was arrested Thursday morning for allegedly using her district-issued credit car[d] to rack up personal expenses of $100,000 over several years, according to several sources with knowledge of the arrest.

Navarro, who resigned in late December 2022, a day before a new Florida law prohibiting elected officials from working as lobbyists went into effect. Navarro is a registered lobbyist for the South Broward Hospital District, which includes Memorial Healthcare System hospitals in Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, Miramar and Joe DiMaggio Children’s Hospital in Hollywood.

Miami-Dade State Attorney Katherine Rundle is expected to offer more details at a 2:30 p.m. press conference at her downtown office.

Navarro earned upwards of $220,000 working for Memorial in 2022. School Board members earn $46,773, according to the Miami-Dade Elections Department.

Back in 2014, I helped Ms. Navarro edit and revise her letters to then-Gov. Rick Scott to get her appointed to the M-DCPS board to replace Carlos Curbelo, who had won a seat in Congress.  Once on the board, she turned hard-right, dissing LGBTQ rights, and otherwise becoming a wormtongue for Ron DeSantis before she was forced to resign due to her lobbying.  (She was known by some as Lobbyin’ Lubby.)

In a way I am sorry I got her on the board and for screwing over the students, but if she hadn’t been there, she wouldn’t have done what got her arrested, so karma did its stuff.

That First Amendment Is A Bitch, Ron

From the New York Times:

Dealing a blow to Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida, a federal court of appeals on Wednesday ruled that he had violated First Amendment protections when he suspended a progressive state prosecutor for political gain.

The ruling, by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, undercut Mr. DeSantis on an episode he has made a key credential in his presidential campaign. Mr. DeSantis forced Andrew Warren, a Democratic state attorney representing the Tampa area, out of office in August 2022 after he had spoken out against Republican policies on abortion and transgender rights.

On the campaign trail, Mr. DeSantis has used the suspension of Mr. Warren, who had been elected to his post twice, to illustrate his strong-arm approach to progressive public officials who push what he calls a “woke” agenda.

The court on Wednesday vacated a decision from a federal judge in Tallahassee in January 2023 not to reinstate Mr. Warren, who has fought the suspension in court, arguing that it violated his First Amendment right to free speech. Now, that judge must reconsider his ruling.

Testimony and records released as part of a late 2022 trial in the case revealed the extent to which the removal of Mr. Warren was motivated by a desire to bolster Mr. DeSantis’s political standing. The district court judge, Robert L. Hinkle, ruled that Mr. DeSantis did not violate Mr. Warren’s First Amendment rights when he suspended him for his own political benefit.

But in its 59-page decision, a three-judge appeals court panel unanimously ruled that Mr. DeSantis did violate Mr. Warren’s First Amendment rights. The panel said Mr. DeSantis needed to prove that Mr. Warren’s performance and policies were the reason he was suspended, and not his personal views on matters such as abortion.

DeSantis has been running on Mr. Warren’s ouster as proof he’s the King Shit of Anti-Woke Mountain… and it’s falling apart as fast as his presidential campaign.

Wednesday, January 10, 2024

SpamSpamSpamSpam

It’s amazing how much spam shit shows up in both my mailboxes.  Most of it is scary Russian or Chinese bot-crap about how Biden is destroying the dollar so invest in these stocks, crypto, or gold, or how Russia destroyed a “hostile” submarine, or there’s a “secret weapon” being developed in the New Mexico desert (like what, the Trinity test?).  It all goes to Junk and I know not to try to unsubscribe because that tells them “Hey, look, we got a live one.”

What I find disturbing is that there are people that fall for this shit.  If they didn’t, of course, they wouldn’t be sending it out.  But along with the conspiracy theories and the “Biden is a maniacal dictator” (or asleep… I wish they’d make up their mind) it’s telling me that we’ve got a lot of very stupid people out there.  That’s how they – the Trumpers – win.

Tuesday, January 9, 2024

The More You Know…

Charlie Pierce on what TFG knew and when he knew it.

Every president swears to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and every printed copy of said Constitution says that one of its original purposes is to “insure domestic tranquility.”

“All of us here today do not want to see our election victory stolen by emboldened radical-left Democrats, which is what they’re doing. And stolen by the fake news media. That’s what they’ve done and what they’re doing. We will never give up, we will never concede. It doesn’t happen. You don’t concede when there’s theft involved. Our country has had enough. We will not take it anymore and that’s what this is all about. And to use a favorite term that all of you people really came up with: We will stop the steal. Today I will lay out just some of the evidence proving that we won this election and we won it by a landslide. This was not a close election.”—El Caudillo del Mar-A-Lago, January 6, 2021.

Nope. That’s not insuring domestic tranquility. Not a bit of it. I asked around.

Over the weekend, ABC reported some fascinating details about what the former president* was doing—spoiler: nothing helpful—while he was failing to insure domestic tranquility at the Capitol. The material came from filings from Jack Smith’s House Of White House Horrors, and it’s sourced to officials of the previous administration* who have been singing lovely songs to the special counsel’s office. These apparently included one Dan Scavino, a former deputy White House chief of staff, who quickly assumed the role of featured soloist in the State’s Evidence Choir.

Sources said Scavino told Smith’s investigators that as the violence began to escalate that day, Trump “was just not interested” in doing more to stop it. Sources also said former Trump aide Nick Luna told federal investigators that when Trump was informed that then-Vice President Mike Pence had to be rushed to a secure location, Trump responded, “So what?” — which sources said Luna saw as an unexpected willingness by Trump to let potential harm come to a longtime loyalist… Sources now describe to ABC News are the assessments and first-hand accounts of several of Trump’s own advisers who stood by him for years — and were among the few to directly engage with him throughout that day. Along with Scavino and Luna, that small group included then-Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, then-White House counsel Pat Cipollone, and Cipollone’s former deputy, Pat Philbin.

They’re all in it up to their eyebrows and they know it, and Jack Smith knows it, and now the court knows it, too.

According to sources, when speaking with Smith’s team, Scavino recalled telling Trump in a phone call the night of Jan. 6: “This is all your legacy here, and there’s smoke coming out of the Capitol.” Scavino hoped Trump would finally help facilitate a peaceful transfer of power, sources said… According to what sources said Scavino told Smith’s team, Trump was “very angry” that day — not angry at what his supporters were doing to a pillar of American democracy, but steaming that the election was allegedly stolen from him and his supporters, who were “angry on his behalf.” Scavino described it all as “very unsettling,” sources said. At times, Trump just sat silently at the head of the table, with his arms folded and his eyes locked on the TV, Scavino recounted, sources said. After unsuccessfully trying for up to 20 minutes to persuade Trump to release some sort of calming statement, Scavino and others walked out of the dining room, leaving Trump alone, sources said. That’s when, according to sources, Trump posted a message on his Twitter account saying that Pence “didn’t have the courage to do what should have been done.”

Lovely. And then, we learn, the rats began running for the ratlines almost immediately.

Trump’s aides told investigators they were shocked by the post. Aside from Trump, Scavino was the only other person with access to Trump’s Twitter account, and he was often the one actually posting messages to it, so when the message about Pence popped up, Cipollone and another White House attorney raced to find Scavino, demanding to know why he would post that in the midst of such a precarious situation, sources said. Scavino said he was as blindsided by the post as they were, insisting to them, “I didn’t do it,” according to the sources. Some of Trump’s aides then returned to the dining room to explain to Trump that a public attack on Pence was “not what we need,” as Scavino put it to Smith’s team. “But it’s true,” Trump responded, sources told ABC News.

This is Mad King bullshit. This is the moment in which, a millennium or so ago, the Praetorian Guard would get together and discuss what shop in Rome had a special on poison that week. This is the moment in which, a century or two ago, banished earls and barons would get together and decide which of their exiled number could raise a big enough army to affect a change of dynasty. We are a civilized people, so we take the bastards to court, and hope that’s enough to keep us tranquil domestically.

More disturbing than this — if that’s possible — is the slavering of his followers and those who equate him with some supernatural messiah.  In any rational world, this would make even the most ardent backers flip and sing to the prosecution.  But this is not a rational world at the moment.

Monday, January 8, 2024

Back To Work

Well, it’s been nice to have some time off for the holidays and entertain a friend and get to do some sight-seeing that I don’t normally do because I live here, but it’s time to go back to work because I don’t get paid if I don’t.  And I need the money.

Good morning.

Sunday, January 7, 2024

Sunday Reading

Ghosts — Susan B. Glaser in The New Yorker on the specter of January 6, 2021.

The long shadow of January 6, 2021, hangs over this election. Three years after a mob of Americans stormed their own Capitol, seeking to block Joe Biden’s victory and keep Donald Trump in the White House, Biden and Trump each began 2024 with plans to make the tragic events of that day the centerpiece of his campaign. For the incumbent, it’s the rationale for his entire Presidency and the most compelling reason to give him a second term—a continuation of the “battle for the soul of America” that animated Biden’s run in 2020. For Trump, it’s the false battle cry around which he hopes to rally the MAGA mob once again. Already, he has proved that millions of his supporters are immune to the truth about January 6th. It will be an incredible act of political sorcery if he can ride his lies about the 2020 election and its violent aftermath back into the White House. And yet, as the year begins, his chances of doing so are better than even.

On Wednesday, in his first day back in the office this new year, the President hosted lunch for a group of American historians to advise him on how to frame the stakes of this election. One attendee, Heather Cox Richardson, a Civil War scholar whose latest book, “Democracy Awakening,” was Biden’s most conspicuous purchase during a day of post-Thanksgiving shopping, has called the visual of Trumpists parading the Confederate flag through Congress on January 6th “a gut-punch larger than any other moment in history.” Biden’s first campaign ad of the year, released on Thursday, leans heavily on the history theme, interspersing violent images of January 6th with old footage of civil-rights and suffragist marches, of Martin Luther King, Jr., and American Marines raising the flag on Iwo Jima in the Second World War. “I’ve made the preservation of American democracy the central issue of my Presidency,” Biden says.

The challenge for Biden, though, is recapturing the visceral outrage of the insurrection—voters have, for years, been bombarded with horrific images of the riot and a steady drip of investigative revelations about how Trump helped conjure it into being—while imbuing it with new meaning and relevance. It is a necessary act of remembrance, but one that risks reminding Americans of how annoyed they are about a 2024 election that looks very likely to be a repeat of 2020. Is there anyone who truly relishes the prospect of Biden and Trump going at it once again, changing few minds while reinforcing for everyone how mired we remain in the division and rancor of that unpleasant year? No country would want to be stuck in such a doom loop.

But doom loop it looks to be. There is no moving on from that day so long as its instigator remains the leader of the Republican Party. In less than two weeks, Trump is on track to secure what could be the largest win in the history of the Iowa Republican caucuses. His lead is so wide that some expect him to sew up the Republican nomination by March. If and when Trump does, he will have accomplished it with a platform that doubles down on January 6th and his own sorry role in calling forth the mob. He is not denying the facts; he is outright rewriting them.

To his original Big Lie about the “rigged election” in 2020, Trump has added ever more lies. He now calls January 6th “a beautiful day” and the nearly thirteen hundred defendants arrested in connection with the attack on the Capitol martyrs and “hostages.” In recent months as he has campaigned for his return to the White House, he has dangled pardons for the insurrectionists, to be issued “on Day 1” of his second term, and threatened instead to lock up the police who tried to defend the Capitol that day. “When people who love our country protest in Washington, they become hostages unfairly imprisoned for long portions of their life,” he told a rally in Iowa last month.

This rhetoric is likely only to escalate in the course of the campaign, as Trump faces both a federal and a state trial on criminal charges connected with his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. In fourteen states, meanwhile, there is pending litigation to keep Trump off the ballot on the ground that his role in inciting the events of January 6th makes him an “insurrectionist” as defined by the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution—a matter soon to make its way to the Supreme Court since both Colorado and Maine have already disqualified him from their ballots. Trump’s legal team is also challenging the federal case against him, on the basis that his extraordinary post-2020-election acts were part of his official duties and thus covered by Presidential “immunity.” One thing we can pretty much say for sure about 2024 is that not a day will go by without the ghost of January 6th echoing loudly in our courtrooms and in our politics.

Another sad but inescapable truth is that Trump’s January 6th revisionism has proved even more politically salient with the Republican electorate than anyone could have predicted on the day itself. Remember all those panicky texts to the White House, begging Trump to call off the mob? “He is destroying his legacy,” Laura Ingraham warned Mark Meadows, Trump’s chief of staff. Even Don, Jr., begged Meadows to intervene: “He’s got to condemn this shit. Asap.” But Trump, it turns out, knew better. A Washington Post/University of Maryland survey published this week found that, in the intervening three years, the number of Republicans who believe Trump’s lies about a “rigged election” has, in fact, gone up. Today, only thirty-one per cent of Republicans believe that Biden is the “legitimate” President, down from thirty-nine per cent in late 2021. The number of Republicans, meanwhile, who believe that Trump personally bears “a great deal” or “a good amount” of responsibility for the events of January 6th has gone down from twenty-seven per cent two years ago to just fourteen per cent today. The right-wing media ecosystem has been so effective in pumping out Trump’s propaganda that the Post/Maryland poll found thirty-four per cent of Republicans now say they believe the bogus conspiracy theory that the F.B.I. itself was responsible for inciting the attack on the Capitol.

If there’s one thing we’ve learned in recent years about Trump’s hold over the G.O.P., it’s this: where his voters go, eventually, even the Republican holdouts in Congress will follow. On Wednesday, Trump was endorsed by House Majority Whip Tom Emmer—barely two months after Trump sank Emmer’s candidacy for the House Speakership, with a social-media post warning that Emmer would be a “tragic mistake” and calling him a “Globalist RINO” who was “totally out-of-touch” with Republican voters. One reason for Trump’s animus? Emmer had voted to certify Biden’s election on January 6th. “They always bend the knee,” the Times quoted Trump as saying of Emmer’s act of self-abasement.

Lesson learned: there is no political future in the G.O.P. without bowing to even Trump’s mightiest lies. The Republicans’ modern-day political alchemist has, in just three years, made 2020-election denialism—and its corollary set of falsehoods about January 6th—a core tenet in the Republican catechism. Who’s to say where this will all end up? The prospect of Trump restored as President, back in the Oval Office on January 20, 2025, pardoning himself and all the other “hostages” seems a lot more real than it did three years ago.

Usually, it’s the winning side that dictates how history will be written. No wonder Biden has started this campaign year by calling in the historians.

Doonesbury — Reversal.

Saturday, January 6, 2024

Friday, January 5, 2024

Happy Friday

On Thursday, January 5, 1989, I flew from Denver to Traverse City, Michigan to pick up the new car that my dad had found for me at Hertz Car Sales.  It was a 1988 Pontiac 6000 Safari station wagon in Dark Sapphire blue with wood-grain, and well-equipped with cloth interior and an AM/FM cassette player.  The asking price was $12,700, but when the dealer, Ernie Pobuda, learned that I had spent $200 on my one-way airfare, he knocked the price down to $12,500.  I drove back to Longmont, Colorado, the following Saturday, and I’ve owned the car ever since.

Today marks thirty-five years since that day.  I’ve owned it almost half of my life.  So far, so good.