O
Descarga la app de Kindle gratis y comienza a leer libros Kindle al instante desde tu smartphone, tablet o computadora, sin necesidad de ningún dispositivo Kindle. Más información
Lee al instante desde tu navegador con Kindle para la web.
Usando la cámara de tu celular escanea el siguiente código y descarga la aplicación Kindle.
Follow the Authors
OK
Over The Cliff: How Obama's Election Drove the American Right Insane Edición Kindle
Precio de Amazon | Nuevo desde | Usado desde |
Pasta blanda
"Vuelva a intentarlo" | US$9.33 | US$1.50 |
- Kindle
$0.00 Lee con Kindle Unlimited para obtener acceso a más de 3 millón de títulos US$5.00 para comprar - Pasta blanda
US$14.46
Compiling example after example, the editors of Crooks and Liars, a popular blog, examine the torrent of right-wing kookery—the eager willingness of conservatives to fervently believe things that are provably false—and its ramifications both for our national discourse and our national well-being. The authors show how this outlandish, overheated rhetoric—generated by mainstream-media figures like Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, and Lou Dobbs—is accompanied by a wave of lethal right-wing threats and violence. They carefully expose the bias of Fox News contributors Neil Cavuto, Greta, Van Susteren, et al, and political opportunists like Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich.
The book explores the main drivers of this descent into madness: the extremist Radical Right and the longtime Republican willingness—dating back to Nixon, but refined in more recent years by Lee Atwater and his acolytes—to engage in a divisive politics of resentment, both racial and cultural.
It takes a critical look at how Tea Party provocateurs like Dick Armey and his Freedom Works organization that take huge contributions from big money interests like former presidential candidate Steve Forbes that are willing to turn a blind eye to bigots, birthers and neo-John Birchers. The book demonstrates how the Tea Party is the true face of the Republican Party.
"John Amato and David Neiwert have produced a book that should stay on the shelves for 50 years -- long enough to remind us that at least some people understood the strange and vile energies consuming the social contract at the beginning of the third millennium. As a record of what is happening to American conservatism in the year 2010, 'Over the Cliff' is unmatched" -- Rick Perlstein, author of 'The Invisible Bridge: The Fall of Nixon and the Rise of Reagan"
"If you want to understand the forces behind the extreme demonization of President Obama and the assault on progressive America, look no further than 'Over the Cliff'. With witty analysis and thorough investigative reporting, Amato and Neiwert provide a definitive chronicle of the far right's rapid movement from paranoia to outright violence." -- Max Blumenthal, author of 'Goliath: Life and Loathing in Greater Israel'
The authors propose simple ways ordinary Americans can help stop the descent into blind opposition for it own sake. They suggest that news audiences demand accountability by from their sources by critically commenting on their Web site and to their editors or producers. They write “confronting the media malfeasance that makes rightwing populism possible is only an important first step in meeting the challenges posed by the rise of this political pathology in American life. Ultimately, it means confronting the movement and its leaders, particularly in their embrace of conspiracy theories, falsehoods, scapegoating, and vicious eliminationist rhetoric.”
- IdiomaInglés
- Fecha de publicación23 Septiembre 2014
- Curso12 and up
- Tamaño del archivo835 KB
Customers who bought this item also bought
Opiniones editoriales
Review
“John Amato and David Neiwert have produced a book that should stay on shelves for 50 years—long enough to remind us that at least some people understood the strange and vile energies consuming the social contract at the beginning of the third millenium. As a record of what is happening to American conservatism in the year 2010, Over the Cliff is unmatched.”
—Rick Perlstein, author of Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America
“If you want to understand the forces behind the extreme demonization of President Obama and the assault on progressive America, look no further than Over the Cliff. With witty analysis and thorough investigative reporting, Amato and Neiwert provide a definitive chronicle of the far-right’s rapid movement from paranoia to outright violence.
—Max Blumenthal, author of Republican Gomorrah: Inside the Movement That Shattered the Party
“Over the Cliff is a genuinely useful cataloguing of the remarkable descent of the American right into vicious name-calling, racist demonizing, and paranoid conspiracy-mongering since the election of Barack Obama. Amato and Neiwert do a first-rate job of chronicling the dangerous, populist rage on the right that pandering politicians and shameless media pundits are aiding and abetting.”
—Mark Potok, director of the Intelligence Project, Southern Poverty Law Center
--Este texto se refiere a una edición agotada o no disponible de este título.
From the Back Cover
-- Rick Perlstein, author of Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America
"If you want to understand the forces behind the extreme demonization of President Obama and the assault on progressive America, look no further than Over the Cliff. With witty analysis and thorough investigative reporting, Amato and Neiwert provide a definitive chronicle of the far-right's rapid movement from paranoia to outright violence."
-- Max Blumenthal, author of Republican Gomorrah: Inside the Movement That Shattered the Party
"Over the Cliff is a genuinely useful cataloguing of the remarkable descent of the American right into vicious name-calling, racist demonizing, and paranoid conspiracy-mongering since the election of Barack Obama. Amato and Neiwert do a first-rate job of chronicling the dangerous, populist rage on the right that pandering politicians and shameless media pundits are aiding and abetting."
-- Mark Potok, director of the Intelligence Project, Southern Poverty Law Center
About the Author
David Neiwert is a freelance journalist and author. His work has appeared in the Washington Post, Salon, Seattle Magazine, and the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Intelligence Report. His online reportage for MSNBC on domestic terrorism won a National Press Club Award in 2000. He is the author of The Eliminationists: How Hate Talk Radicalized the American Right (PoliPointPress) and editor of the award-winning weblog Orcinus (http://dneiwert.blogspot.com).
--Este texto se refiere a una edición agotada o no disponible de este título.
Detalles del producto
- ASIN : B00NUQJXQS
- Fecha de publicación : 23 Septiembre 2014
- Idioma : Inglés
- Tamaño del archivo : 835 KB
- Texto a voz : Activado
- Lector de pantalla: : Respaldados
- Composición tipográfica mejorada : Activado
- X-Ray : No activado
- Word Wise : Activado
- Notas adhesivas : En Kindle Scribe
- Número de páginas : 280 páginas
- Clasificación en los más vendidos de Amazon: nº1,622,594 en Tienda Kindle (Ver el Top 100 en Tienda Kindle)
- nº547 en Pensamiento Radical (Tienda Kindle)
- nº630 en Propaganda y Psicología Política
- nº1,001 en Ideología Radical
- Opiniones de clientes:
About the authors
David Neiwert is a journalist and author and an acknowledged expert in American right-wing extremism. He has appeared Anderson Cooper 360, CNN Newsroom, and The Rachel Maddow Show and is the Pacific Northwest correspondent for the Southern Poverty Law Center. His work has also appeared in "Mother Jones" Reveal News, "The American Prospect," "The Washington Post," MSNBC.com, Salon.com, and other publications. His previous books include "Of Orcas and Men: What Killer Whales Can Teach Us" (2015, Overlook), and "And Hell Followed With Her: Crossing the Dark Side of the American Border" (2013, NationBooks: Winner of the International Latino Book Award for General Nonfiction) and he has won a National Press Club award for Distinguished Online Journalism.
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The authors explain how a racist America accelerated quickly into overdrive. Blacks were beaten and killed because of an elected black man. There was a spike in hits on white supremicist websites and right wing blogs. Three police officers were killed in Pittsburgh by a man who believed that Obama would take away his guns.
The Republican reaction could have been an honest analysis of why they lost, but denial was a more soothing way to think. It wasn't that conservatism was bad or weak, it was because conservatives had lost their way. They turned on one of the most conservative administrations in history and its leader, George W. Bush for not having been conservative enough. It spawned a right wing movement called the Tea Party whom the Republicans thought they could use and control. However, it turned out the the Tea Partiers started pulling party strings instead by their support of ultra conservative candidates.
The College or Right Wing Pundits offered courses in hysteria, paranoia, guilt-by-association, disinformation and falsehoods as they spawned an irrational hatred for the president that went far beyond his actions, real or perceived: He wasn't an American citizen; he was a secret Muslim, a terrorist sympathizer, a Marxist, and a communist with a small "c." We were going to be attacked by terrorists. He apologized for the United States; he was ignoring the will of the people, and he was taking away the citizens' constitutional rights. This was the pablum that fed an extremist fringe that had to find rationalizations for a lack of popular support. Glenn Beck, Dick Morris, Sean Hannity, Newt Gingrich, Aaron Klein, Michele Malkin, Fox Television, and others are churning out books and stories daily on "taking back America."
In spite of this mass and mainstream media blitz, the right wing and white supremicists blame the "lamestream media" for giving Obama a pass and for not having investigated his "shady background and associations," even though it was Fox News, the fair and balanced network, making news rather than reporting it when it came to Tea Party coverage and outright advocacy by stirring the crowds. Amato and Neiwert hold a special place for Fox News when they show time and again how their news coverage cropped speeches and events to misinform the public, and advocated for the Tea Pary platform. Fox also took special vengeance on those who critized their network. Relentlessly employing the term "socialists" and "czars," they made van Jones, Cass Sunstein and Anita Dunn frequent targets, as well as others. The authors were pointing out that they weren't attacking these people as much as they were attacking Obama. Even a once respected Lou Dobbs of CNN began stirring the paranoid pot by demanding that Obama produce a birth certificate that had been validated many times over.
This right wing has also perfected what the authors called "waving the bloody shirt" response, in which the truth is inverted where the bully becomes the victim and vice versa. A charge of racism becomes an attack on their integrity, and agitation toward racial warfare. How dare you make the charge even though their signs show Obama in "black face" like the Klan would have done.
And in Sarah Palin they find their true hero. Ignorant, sexy, acultural and full of self-pity, her anti-intellectualism is a celebration of her integrity and credibility. She's the soccer mom, and the joe six-pack, with lipstick. (?) Well, something like that.
Palin embodies her lies and divisiveness in what is called sucker populism, or producerism, which is a ploy of the wealthy to keep the middle and poorer class believing that their industry and invention alone will help them win the lottery of joining the exclusive club at Millionaire Acres, that their enemies are the "lazy entitlement oafs at the bottom, and the superwealthy such as George Soros. The wealthy are the staunchest advocates of this brand of populism as they become its chief beneficiary while the ordinary working stiff bears the heavier tax load and tells himself, like Thumper, "if I only work harder." The right wing are the "thumpers" who have the most to lose, yet are the staunchest advocates of losing out-- true sucker populism.
This book was an easy read. Amato and Neiwert amassed hundreds of documents and dozens of hours of news coverage, cropped and whole, to show the disparity of accurate news reporting and the distortions and disinformation that has been coming from the Drudge Report and Conservative News Daily. The authors "blame" the progressives for attempting to rebuild what a previous administration took eight years to ruin, instead of remaining vigilant and reactive to the rise of right wing fantasies that fill the airwaves and the Internet. This is a new generation of Father Coughlins and Joe McCarthys who are instilling hate, fear and paranoia. The error is considering these people so far from reality that their message will not succeed, but the Nazi Party started in the same small way.
This account will also help you remember all the occasions of news reporting slight-of-hand, and propaganda that is being fed to a public that firmly believes that concentration camps, black helicopters, martial law, and socialist style government awaits their fate. The same people who claimed that administration critics of two short years ago were committing treason, are now advocating armed insurrection and sedition.
This book should not be taken lightly; it should only be taken home and read, and taken seriously.
The right wing continues as you read this.
Regular readers of John Amato's "Crooks and Liars" blog, of which Dave Neiwert is the editor, will have seen a lot of the particular events described in real time. Dave is a genuine journalistic expert on the Radical Right and writes about it regularly. But even for those who have followed the Radical Right at "Crooks and Liars" and other news sources, there's real value in seeing a book length description of various events and personalities, which allows the writers to focus at some length on major themes while also making the chronological narrative clear.
In the chapter called "Bloodying the Shirt", they offer some insight into a favorite habit of conservatives, especially of the far right, that can often be disconcerting to those not familiar with it. They tell the story of anti-abortion fanatic and Christian terrorist Scott Roeder who murdered Dr. George Tiller, an abortion provider on May 31, 2009. Bill O'Reilly had run reports on Tiller and framed them in inflammatory terms. But, of course, when Roeder struck, O'Reilly indignently tried to distance himself from any kind responsibility for contributing to the atmosphere that encouraged a Christian terrorist like Roeder.
Amato and Neiwert talk about the reverse accusations that people like O'Reilly often make when confronted with such challenges: they make the critics into the problem, not their own actions or incitement. Amato and Neiwert explain this by Southern whining in the late 19th century about the "bloody shirt" tactic. Citing historian Stephan Budiansky, they explain that pro-Reconstruction Congressman Ben Butler made an issue out of a Northerner whipped on the back by Ku Klux Klan thugs, and legend arose that he had waved a bloody shirt of the man's on the House floor.
Though there is no evidence for Butler ever having made that particularly dramatic gesture, conservative white Southerners made "waving the bloody shirt" a favorite slogan to use against any criticism of violence and lawlessness committed by anti-Reconstruction whites. The idea is to frame the criticism itself as reprehensible, rather than the actual heinous acts being criticized. We see Republican conservatives using a variation of this tactic today, and not only in response to criticism of violent acts. As the authors point out, Republican pundits used it to fend off criticism of the Tea Party.
The book traces the rise of the Tea Party with heavy support from Republican Party front groups like Dick Armey's FreedomWorks and the de facto Party channel, FOX News. It's tricky to characterize a relatively amorphous "movement". But there has been extensive media coverage and well as a good deal of opinion polling probing the ideas and perspectives of those who identify with the Tea Party. It's hard to see how one reasonably interprets this available information in any other way than to see the Tea Party movement as a Republican Party mobilization of its base.
But the fact that the movement was ginned up by the Republican Party does not mean that it is nothing but Party astroturf (fake grass roots). Dave Neiwert and other close observers of the Radical Right have been pointing out from the beginning of the Tea Party that far-right activists from the Patriot Militia, xenophobic anti-immigrant, and other militant fringe groups have used the Tea Party to raise their own profiles and to mainstream more of their own ideology. In their chapter, "The Brakes Fail", they detail some of the ways in which Tea Party activists have proved to be something a loose cannon for the Party in some instances.
The Republican Party has undergone an extended process of radicalization. From whenever one dates its beginning, anyone capable of recognizing the radicalization can see that by the time the Party made torture one of its core values, the radicalization process was quite far along. The reporting and analysis put together in "Over the Cliff" show how the Tea Party can represent both an intensification of the radicalization process and at the same time be not some nonpartisan political insurgency, but rather the face of the Republican Party out of power.
I would pick nits with a couple of historical points. They write that the rise of the Tea Party movement in 2009 "was when the craziness reached depths previously unseen in American politics." But we haven't yet reached nearly the level of craziness of the South in the run-up to the Civil War. I'm not sure some of the far right hysteria during the early years of the Franklin Roosevelt administration or during the period of McCarthyism wasn't worse than now.
And I did a big double-take at a quote they include from Chip Berlet on the ideology of "producerism", which is the description they apply to the Tea Party brand of "populism" that tries to rally working people to oppose Big Government and unfavored races (African-Americans and Latinos in the Tea Party case), while defending Big Business and the very wealthy doing what they want, the public interest be damned. They quote Berlet saying, "Producerism begins in the U.S. with the Jacksonians, who wove together intra-elite factionalism and lower-class Whites' double-edged resentments." This is a very misleading, ahistorical characterization of Jacksonian democracy and the Jacksonian movement. In fact, the group that the late historian Richard Hofstadter and others agree was the first significant element to promote the "paranoid style" in US politics, aka, crackpot extremism, did arise during the Jacksonian era. It was the Anti-Masonic Party and was bitterly opposed to Jackson and his reforms. That claim of Berlet's is a real whopper.
But those are sidelines in Amato's and Neiwert's analysis of the contemporary right wing in the United States. Now that primary results are rolling in and Rand Paul has become a star of sorts among our leading pundits with his Bircher-theocratic brand of "libertarianism", Over the Cliff is a valuable resource for understanding daily politics in the US at the moment.