![](/web/20240510051621im_/https://thirdworldtraveler.com/PageMill_Images/logo.gif)
The Whole World Was Watching [Burma]
by Sarah Stillman
http://www.truthdig.com/, January
22, 2008
![](/web/20240510051621im_/https://thirdworldtraveler.com/PageMill_Images/redblueline.gif)
Stillman: The U.N. has reported on "grave
child rights violations," including the forced recruiting
of children into the army. Apparently there's pressure to accelerate
army recruitment rates, and brokers are said to be paid $30 and
a bag of rice for each child soldier recruited. The U.N. also
found that some children who desert from the Burmese military
are given prison terms of up to five years. What is the state
of the military. ... Is the regime so desperate that it has to
recruit kids?
Maung Maung: Yes, the regime is having
serious problems recruiting. The military used to be a respected
entity, but this is no longer true. Although the top generals
are filthy rich, many of their soldiers face great economic hardships.
They don't even have basic footwear-many of them go around in
sandals or barefoot. It's just not impressive! When a soldier
doesn't have any shoes, it not only makes it hard to fight, but
it also shakes his faith in his superiors.
We have a database of how many individuals are deserting the military,
and it shows that more and more men at the senior levels of the
military are defecting. This is due mostly to the hardships that
their families face. It's a sad fact, but many of the soldiers'
wives and daughters have become prostitutes to cope with the poverty.
Reasons like this explain why the military is having a hard time
recruiting.
And so what have they done? The regime is forcibly taking children,
especially high school kids hanging out at the theater or wherever.
The army truck pulls up, and the kids are forced into the back
of the truck and taken to the police station, where they are left
to sleep overnight. The next morning, the sergeant shows up and
tells them that they've committed a crime and that the only way
to avoid jail is to join the military.
Stillman: How would you describe the role
of the trade union movement in the Burmese opposition? You're
a union leader, as are many of the key people who play pivotal
roles in charting the next steps for this struggle. How did labor
people come to play such a vital role?
Maung Maung: Well, I wouldn't say we're
necessarily prominent. But the real key is that the trade unionists
are the only unit of activists inside Burma who have unique experience
with international organizations. We know exactly how to link
up with trade union movements around the world to get basic training
materials, and also to get references on the techniques used by
other countries in other struggles in history.
We also have people who are well trained in organizing skills,
unlike most of the movement's student activists. I can ask any
union person to come and offer training to our activists for two
weeks, and they'll come-we get tremendous help from the ILO [International
Labor Organization], the ITUC [International Trade Union Confederation,]
the SEIU [Service Employees International Union] and other groups.
The ILO even has an office in Rangoon, working on international
monitoring issues and providing protection for us. This isn't
true with the students or political organizations, who have a
big handicap on the international front. They often lack basic
organizing skills.
Stillman: You mention learning from other
countries. When the street demonstrations were going on, Bishop
Tutu of South Africa strongly backed the monks and other protesters,
saying, "It is so like the rolling mass actions that eventually
toppled apartheid." Certainly there are many differences,
but do you see parallels from the success of the anti-apartheid
movement?
Maung Maung: Well, different countries,
different struggles. I'd say that the overall similarity is that
the international effort must be coordinated. We need a wide
array of governments to support the United Nation's initiatives
in a coordinated way. The U.S. is doing it, and the UK is, too.
France is starting to wake up, and Italy.
But we're been having big problems with the Germans, who've been
a pain in the neck. They want to have their own approach. We
need unity. Most countries are slowly moving towards working
together, with the U.N. at the helm. Even China is starting to
think like that. Coordination, like in South Africa, is the most
important thing.
Stillman: What do you think is the most
constructive role that American advocates can play in the pro-democracy
struggle? What forms of action or protest would be most helpful?
Maung Maung: There has been a huge amount
of moral support from American politicians, but the U.S. government
hasn't fully delivered. Sure, Congress has done a lot, and there
is even support from Laura Bush, but we have huge problems with
logistics and implementation.
What it really comes down to is money: We need simple things like
bicycles and satellite phones. People may laugh, but the movement
really needs bicycles. In Burma, fuel is very expensive, so bicycles
allow organizers to go around and speak with individuals in different
areas.
We also need money for video cameras, digital cameras and cell
phones-these things are transforming our movement. It's by bringing
the eyes of the world back to the brutality of the regime that
we can win out.
Stillman: But how much was the regime
able to crack down on this activity in September? I read that
they tried to cut off cell phone reception and Internet connectivity.
....
Maung Maung: Well, if you look at the
number of bloody images from the protests, you can see that the
activists found their way around the regime. In the beginning,
the junta didn't know what the hell was happening. Young people
were running around with their hand-held mobile phones and passing
on photographs to people outside the country. They were two steps
ahead.
The regime controlled the gateway to the Internet-it was really
more of an Intra-net than an Internet-and they tried to shut it
down, but the young people were breaking out for themselves, using
their brains to get around the regime's barriers.
Stillman: I'd like to get your take on
some U.S. legislative issues. Last month, Congress passed legislation
authored by Rep. Tom Lantos that would cut off tax deductions
for business activities in Burma by U.S. companies, such as Chevron.
The bill will also block the current laundering of Burmese gemstones,
particularly rubies, through third countries before they are sold
here. If these new measures get signed by President Bush and
become law, how big a blow will they be to the military regime?
Maung Maung: Well, the regime wants the
world to think that Burma is a free and open economy, but if you
scrutinize it, you'll see that there are only two or three real
monopolies controlling everything. The first is the U.M.E.H.
[Union of Myanmar Economic Holdings], which is owned by the military.
The second is owned by a business tycoon named Tay Za, and he's
the son-in-law of the regime's top general. The third is a guy
named Steven Law [who is alleged to have links to Burma's drug
trade].
If you want to do mining for gems or jade in Burma, you have to
buy permission from the military's own holdings company, so your
very first investment in the project, even before you start digging,
goes directly to the government. You also have to give a certain
percentage of your profits to the government once you sell the
gems, along with an export tax. So, to get a single ruby into
the global marketplace, you have to feed money to the government
at least three times.
That's why it's so important that Burma's gem and jade business
be shut down. A long time ago, before I became an activist, I
was a gemologist. I worked for the Burmese government for 12
years, so I know the business well, and I know that Burma has
the best gems in the world. In order to get around the sanctions
that were placed on Burmese gems [in 2003], they are bought by
the Thai traders, recut in Thailand, and resold as "Thai"
exports.
But any gemologist can look at a collector's piece and see immediately
that it's come from Burma. You can't lie about what we call "internal
inclusions," which are always unique to the site of mining:
air bubbles, gas bubbles, rubies within rubies. A gem that is
mined in, say, Dupont Circle, would be very different from a gem
that is mined in Rockville. So you can identify the origins of
a gem, if you bother to try.
Although the Thai exporters will continue to claim that their
rubies are coming from Thailand, most of the top-quality gemstones
are still coming from Burma, and we need to close up these legal
loopholes. I think this new piece of legislation is just the
beginning.
Stillman: China has significant influence
with the Burmese military regime, given its extensive trade and
military ties to the junta. And China has blocked meaningful
actions by the U.N. Security Council on Burma. What would you
like to see done to pressure China on Burma? Some have urged
a boycott of the Olympic Games this summer. ....
Maung Maung: We're not calling for a boycott
of the Olympics. First of all, the Olympics are time-bound.
They come and they go in 2008. Second of all, the athletes have
spent their whole lives preparing for this event, and we want
to respect that.
Having said that, what we need is to inform China that a stable
Burma is good for everybody. We are not looking to kick up China's
investments in Burma; we're looking at a system that would allow
democratic participation for everybody in Burma's politics and
economics, and, therefore, greater stability.
Stillman: And what about India? It, too,
could have an impact on the regime, and while China is repressive
in its own right, India is a democracy that ought to play a constructive
role but hasn't-due to its energy interests, it seems.
Maung Maung: Being a large democracy,
India is a very bulky animal to move around-the bureaucracy is
so big that it's hard to tell what's going on. They were supportive
of the pro-democracy movement earlier, but we don't know what
shifts have taken place. It seems like energy and gas availability
from Burma has made India more willing to get comfortable with
the regime.
Once again, we need to emphasize: Democracy in Burma is the best
way to ensure that the raw energy that Indian needs comes from
a stable and reliable source.
Stillman: How effective do you think the
various targeted sanctions by the U.S. are on the regime's top
leaders: the ban on travel visas, restrictions on bank accounts,
and so on?
Maung Maung: It's making the regime go
crazy. I must point out that, except from the U.S., there have
been no sanctions from anybody. Some people say that sanctions
haven't worked, but I want to challenge them: Excuse me, but can
you tell me who has even tried to place forceful sanctions
on Burma? Europeans, mostly, have not. European countries have
visa bans, but nothing to strike at the heart of the economic
issues. It's only the United States that has done anything substantive.
We have to thank the U.S. customs people and other authorities
for following up on [presidential] executive orders.
As small as they are, the financial sanctions are making a huge
economic impact. The man I mentioned earlier-Tay Za-owned an
airline called Air Bagan. It flew to Singapore and Thailand,
and the military generals were very proud of it. But then the
financial scrutiny hit Tay Za, and the banks in Singapore refused
to handle his money. The French, too, stopped servicing his planes,
and Tay Za eventually had to give up the enterprise.
The business community in Singapore is scrutinizing Burmese accounts
more harshly than ever before. There have been complaints from
Burmese merchants about it. We know it's making a big difference.
Stillman: The U.N. has reported on "grave
child rights violations," including the forced recruiting
of children into the army. Apparently there's pressure to accelerate
army recruitment rates, and brokers are said to be paid $30 and
a bag of rice for each child soldier recruited. The U.N. also
found that some children who desert from the Burmese military
are given prison terms of up to five years. What is the state
of the military. ... Is the regime so desperate that it has to
recruit kids?
Maung Maung: Yes, the regime is having
serious problems recruiting. The military used to be a respected
entity, but this is no longer true. Although the top generals
are filthy rich, many of their soldiers face great economic hardships.
They don't even have basic footwear-many of them go around in
sandals or barefoot. It's just not impressive! When a soldier
doesn't have any shoes, it not only makes it hard to fight, but
it also shakes his faith in his superiors.
We have a database of how many individuals are deserting the military,
and it shows that more and more men at the senior levels of the
military are defecting. This is due mostly to the hardships that
their families face. It's a sad fact, but many of the soldiers'
wives and daughters have become prostitutes to cope with the poverty.
Reasons like this explain why the military is having a hard time
recruiting.
And so what have they done? The regime is forcibly taking children,
especially high school kids hanging out at the theater or wherever.
The army truck pulls up, and the kids are forced into the back
of the truck and taken to the police station, where they are left
to sleep overnight. The next morning, the sergeant shows up and
tells them that they've committed a crime and that the only way
to avoid jail is to join the military.
Stillman: How would you describe the role
of the trade union movement in the Burmese opposition? You're
a union leader, as are many of the key people who play pivotal
roles in charting the next steps for this struggle. How did labor
people come to play such a vital role?
Maung Maung: Well, I wouldn't say we're
necessarily prominent. But the real key is that the trade unionists
are the only unit of activists inside Burma who have unique experience
with international organizations. We know exactly how to link
up with trade union movements around the world to get basic training
materials, and also to get references on the techniques used by
other countries in other struggles in history.
We also have people who are well trained in organizing skills,
unlike most of the movement's student activists. I can ask any
union person to come and offer training to our activists for two
weeks, and they'll come-we get tremendous help from the ILO [International
Labor Organization], the ITUC [International Trade Union Confederation,]
the SEIU [Service Employees International Union] and other groups.
The ILO even has an office in Rangoon, working on international
monitoring issues and providing protection for us. This isn't
true with the students or political organizations, who have a
big handicap on the international front. They often lack basic
organizing skills.
Stillman: You mention learning from other
countries. When the street demonstrations were going on, Bishop
Tutu of South Africa strongly backed the monks and other protesters,
saying, "It is so like the rolling mass actions that eventually
toppled apartheid." Certainly there are many differences,
but do you see parallels from the success of the anti-apartheid
movement?
Maung Maung: Well, different countries,
different struggles. I'd say that the overall similarity is that
the international effort must be coordinated. We need a wide
array of governments to support the United Nation's initiatives
in a coordinated way. The U.S. is doing it, and the UK is, too.
France is starting to wake up, and Italy.
But we're been having big problems with the Germans, who've been
a pain in the neck. They want to have their own approach. We
need unity. Most countries are slowly moving towards working
together, with the U.N. at the helm. Even China is starting to
think like that. Coordination, like in South Africa, is the most
important thing.
Stillman: What do you think is the most
constructive role that American advocates can play in the pro-democracy
struggle? What forms of action or protest would be most helpful?
Maung Maung: There has been a huge amount
of moral support from American politicians, but the U.S. government
hasn't fully delivered. Sure, Congress has done a lot, and there
is even support from Laura Bush, but we have huge problems with
logistics and implementation.
What it really comes down to is money: We need simple things like
bicycles and satellite phones. People may laugh, but the movement
really needs bicycles. In Burma, fuel is very expensive, so bicycles
allow organizers to go around and speak with individuals in different
areas.
We also need money for video cameras, digital cameras and cell
phones-these things are transforming our movement. It's by bringing
the eyes of the world back to the brutality of the regime that
we can win out.
Burma watch
Home Page