Showing posts with label Omnibus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Omnibus. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Cross Border Lobbying and the Reality Behind Conservative Enthusiasm for Bill C10

Prison Expansion: Canada
There is plenty to know about prison expansion in general and specifically about what is taking place in Canada as we speak.  Below I've included a link to "End the Prison Industrial Complex's" information regarding the companies which are profiting from prison expansion in Canada.  
 

http://endthepic.wordpress.com/profiteers/

I've also included a link to a short piece by Rittenhouse on the same issue which relates to the complexities around prison building, human suffering, and the need for fair income opportunites.  
 http://joanr73.wordpress.com/2012/07/10/end-the-prison-industrial-complex-epic/


Then you will find a link by the California Prison Moratorium project to a handbook entitled, "How to Stop a Prison in Your Town".  A timely resource for everyone living with a future prison overshadowing your town and potentially your own freedomWhether contractors have broken ground in your community yet or not this booklet provides some real insight into all of the many impacts which prisons are apt to bring with them and provides strategy ideas, as well as responses to some of the most widely used misinformation intended to soften opposition to prison building.

www.calipmp.org/media/docs/2011_pmphdbk1-22.pdf


And finally you can read a copy of an article I've written on prison expansion and prison profiteer lobbying for the same on both sides of the Canada/US border, chock full of information on expansion plans across Canada and resources where you can learn more. 

Cross Border Lobbying and the Reality Behind Conservative Enthusiasm for Bill C10
by sheryl jarvis, July, 2012


Is Bill C10 really about "Safe Streets and Communities" as its name implies or are there ulterior motives.  Many suspect Bill C10 really lays the groundwork for generating new sources of revenue, a warped vision of economic repair, by opening our prisons to private markets.  This allows corporations here in Canada to rake in the big bucks which capitalists to the south have been enjoying for years.  Rapacious capitalists have finally found a way to transform those they consider burdens to the state, into profit for the rich.  The bodies of the poor, those who use drugs, and the mentally ill are sourced out to third parties for profit through privatized prisons.   

  Christian Parenti, author of Lockdown America describes how imprisonment is a windfall to capitalists; three ways in which incarceration bolsters capitalism: government economic stimulus for stagnant communities the privatization of prisons and prison-related services, and the exploitation of prison labor by private firms.”  

The mainstream media has only recently begun discussing the profit motive (i.e.: privatization) behind conservative support of Bill C10.  When plans to privatize imprisonment (a function of class war)  have been in the works for years, and visibly on the books since at least November of last year. 
Critics opposing the Bill have focused on the direct impacts that C10 sanctions will likely have on those to be targeted by the Bill, such as longer prison terms and criminal records.  While these issues are important, critical even, they only scratch the service and fail to look at the ideology beneath increased calls for the use of criminalising tactics.  Ideology which includes the isolating effects of blaming only the individual and failing to look at lawbreaking within the larger context of the surrounding social structures.  Structures such as poverty, inequality, violence against women, colonization, and ableism (think neo-liberal push for lower wages, fewer worker protections, drug war, and the defunding of womens orgs.....and for that matter, everyone else who speaks out), much of which has long been institutionalized through policy, practice, and belief. 

Day of action to support workers on strike at Electro-Motive facility in London, On.  Employers threatened to pull the plant out of Canada if workers did not accept a 50% wage cut.  Workers refused, Electro left, and the neo-liberal Canadian government which had gifted the company millions of dollars in tax deductions and other forms of corporate welfare did nothing.
If public safety and accountability of individuals were the true motive in these massive policy changes, the conservatives would be going at this from a completely different direction.  After all expert after expert have pointed to provisions of safe, affordable housing, and childcare, access to opportunity, jobs, education, and substance use treatment as being far more likely to increase public safety than the biased and exclusionary practice of criminalisation has ever been or will ever be.
Profit and not public safety is more likely the true conservative motivation behind the crime agenda. 
Exploitation of our most vulnerable people by turning individual bodies into sources of revenue - profit for private hands, through imprisonment and forced prisoner labour is the most egregious form of bullying practices, and a terrifying stance for any nation leader to be implementing.  The belief systems driving these forms of classist, and racist policy change are so socially entrenched,  that the effects are invisible to all but the vulnerable people targeted.  People begin to believe that retribution, hate, and exclusion are not only warranted and deserved, but a natural consequence to lawbreaking or for that matter, any breach of the current "moral" order.  Only through decades of struggle has the face of such deep seated intolerance ever been up rooted, and shown for what it really is – hatred, fear, and ignorance.  Think of the centuries long struggles of aboriginal, African, and female bodied peoples.  The fact is, that we are nowhere near close to exposing the truth behind the true causes of community harm – that which we refer to as crime.  We are simply not ready to talk about it in a wide spread and critical way.  Because of this, prisons are likely to be a part of the social landscape for a very long time to come.
Private Prison Profiteers in the USA

Private interest groups have 3 means for influencing and convincing government to support their efforts.  Lobbying, direct campaign contributions, and networking.  Networking includes revolving door techniques such as moving private prison owners between prison ownership and government jobs in corrections.
                                            
One journalist had this to report on the lobbying efforts of private prison profiteers in the US, “For one thing, they’ve forked over a fair share on lobbying Congress. While netting $133 million in income between 2006 and 2008, the CCA spent nearly $3 million lobbying; during that decade, the number of dollars spent in Washington amounted to around $17.6 million.  Corrections Corporation of America officers have been linked to the American Legislative Exchange Council, or ALEC, which has in turn lobbied for increased sentencing for inmates convicted of non-violent crimes across the country and helped pass the controversial immigration law in Arizona. Corrections Corp. themselves have lobbied for Arizona’s Senate Bill 1070, and the reasoning is simple: an more stringent immigrant laws means more arrests and, thus, more jam-packed for-profit prisons.”  (thinkprogress.org)
 Journalists at the online “404 System Error”, a relatively new and completely cool independent news source, report a system which encourages the increase of prison populations through a per head funding system which benefits players all down the criminal legal system line.  “In 2009 reports obtained by National Public Radio found that the Corrections Corporation of America conceded in a report that they expected  “a significant portion of our revenues” to come  from the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency. According to Bloomberg BusinessWeek, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement pays around $90 every day for each detainee that their work helps land behind bars.”
So not only do those working in the criminal legal field benefit financially through the work they do – criminalising mostly working class people, but they have designed the system in such a way that it pays out “bonus’” per arrestee.  
US Prison Profiteers Seek Capitalist Expansion in Canada
2 of the largest privatized prison profiteers in the US, Geo Group Inc. and Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) have been busy lobbying our Canadian government around Bill C10, firearms, and other criminal law issues.  And more recently US based Management and Training Corp has joined the tough on crime fray, looking to Canada to replace the bucks they are currently losing in the states where they have virtually been pushed including Mississippi, due to multiple court actions suing MTC for sexual misconduct, failing to maintain safety for prisoners, assault, and even wrongful death.  In fact this track record is hardly individual to MTC, all of the private prison profiteers mentioned here have similar histories.  These are the players currently laying the ground work for expansion of this dirtiest form of capitalist profit onto Canadian soil.
 
CCA's record of hiring untrained guards who brutalize prisoners is notorious.   In fact these histories are rampant throughout the prison system period.  However the conditions (poor salaries and training for staff which lead to constant staffing shortages, which in turn ensures a near constant state of lockdown. Compounding these issues are the limited access to healthcare, insufficient food, tampons, and other toiletries for prisoners) at private institutions are conducive to higher tension and stress levels for both prisoners and guards, ensuring the number of violent incidents within privately owned/managed facilities are through the roof, over and above any numbers at publically run facilities.
 Geo reported income of 61 million in 2008, increasing to over 98 million in 2011.  They imprisoned 80,000 people in state, federal, and international prisons, immigration holds, and mental health facilities in the US, the UK, Australia, and South Africa last year.  And have several expansion projects in the works this year.  If those impressive records didn’t stir you maybe their human rights record will.  Geo has managed to rack up substantial numbers here too. Charges of negligence, civil rights violations, abuse, and even death. 
Civil Rights lawyer, Scott Medlock had this to say, “GEO cuts corners by hiring poorly trained guards, providing inmates with cut rate medical care, and running their facility in a grossly unprofessional manner.”  (Rosa, E., 2009) This is perhaps the number one criticism in regards to for profit prison profiteers generally.  Cutting corners, and risking prisoner health all in the name of the bottom line.  
Canada – US Lobbying
This idea of cross border lobbying is actually far more common than many of us might be aware.  Canadian markets lobby the US congress and US markets lobby the Canadian parliament, often pushing for changes to policy, and law, with profit being a top motive.  According to The Centre for Responsive Politics (2012), Canadian corporations have contributed about 2.5 million to candidates in the congressional elections so far this year.  “Big hitters” are Microsoft and the Royal Bank of Canada.
US to Canada Lobbying – Prison Privatization
Conversely, when American capitalists detect the possibility of profit this side of the border, they lobby our government intensely with the hopes of influencing policy decisions.  A contradiction of capitalism is its need to seek out and expand into new markets, to find ever new profits outside of itself.  One method for achieving ever greater market shares is to look to new lands, to convince new people (governments, corporations, the public, the media) that we need a particular product or service that we don’t yet have – private, for profit prisons are what’s missing from the Canadian landscape.  Thus an opportunity for American bread capitalism and corporatists to expand outside of their own borders, into Canada and elsewhere.                                  
 

The GEO Group for instance is a registered lobbyist with active dealings among the following branches of the Canadian Federal Government:
  • Correctional Service of Canada (CSC)
  • Public Safety Canada (PS)
  • Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC)
  • Public-Private Partnerships Canada, Solicitor General Canada (SGC)
The news of USA based prison profiteers lobbying here in Canada has remained pretty hushed within the mainstream media and most reporting has been through online independents.
So what did consultants employed by Geo have to talk about with the Canadian government?  In fact there were 2 separate consultants, Ronald Bilodeau and Patrick Gagnon hired by Ronald Champion, Vice President of Geo, from March 2011 – Currently for similar purposes Notes made by Ronald and Patrick on the Government of Canada web page state the following, Assist the client about the possibilities of public markets for the operation of institutions of correctional services, Discuss the possibility to establish a public-private partnership for the operating of correctional institutions in Canada, contracts to modernize correctional facilities in Canada.”  “We are assisting the client regarding procurement opportunities pertaining to the operation of correctional services institutions”

Prison Privatization in Canada

 MTC, sent packing with Mike Harris
Canada has attempted prison privatization twice.  Currently with a youth facility in New Brunswick, privately managed by U.S. prison firm, Management and Training Corp (MTC), and once previously in Ontario under the conservative Harris regime of the time.  Management and security was provided by MTC for that facility as well.  The Ontario facility was a horror to those imprisoned there, to their families, and it was a dismal failure for the tax payer who footed the bill for inferior management outcomes, and human rights abuses.
 
Law firm, Fasken Marineau, provided services to the then provincial Ministry of Correctional Services on Central North Correctional Centre (CNCC) in 1998. They are “experts” in Public/Private or P3 advising.  They were also responsible for advising and structuring the 407 highway privatization agreement a decade ago and which is set to cost taxpayers hundreds of thousands, if not millions more than it need have.  

Fasken Marineau posted this comment on their webpage in regards to expectations of the private CNCC facility at the time, “This public-private partnership is part of the Government's commitment to transform the Province's correctional system to one that is more safe, secure, effective, efficient and accountable.”  
Unfortunately the CNCC under Utah based Management & Training Corp. was less safe for prisoners and staff alike with chronic staff shortages,  contributing to an increase in violence,  a decrease in security both cause and effect of increased violence, prisoner healthcare services were decimated, and recidivism increased.  
One of the claims around privatisation of public services is that private entities will be more accountable.  My understanding is that when the money is coming out of their own pockets, one is likely to be more responsible with it.  But the truth is that the upfront operating costs are paid for by the tax payer via the government.  The question for the prison operator then, is, how much money can I rake back for my own pockets, not how much must I pay out from my own pockets. 
According to a John Howard Society staffer, “Any decision to continue or even expand privatization initiatives would be based on the results of the comparison of CNCC, the privately-operated facility and CECC which would continue to be publicly-operated.”

On Sept. 19, 2002 corrections guards at CNCC voted to unionize in response to terrible working conditions.  Staff number was 350 and they were to receive the same training as those in the publicly-operated facilities.  After unionization (represented by OPSEU), their salaries and benefits were similar to public employees.  Most staff were new to corrections, having just been hired by MTC since its opening. (John Howard, 2006)


Specific Incidents at CNCC:
·        In September 2002, a riot occurred Around 100 prisoners using a battering ram were prevented from escaping and a cordon of armed Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) including the tactical rescue and canine units had to be stationed around the perimeter.
·        The death in August 2003 of former CNCC prisoner Jeffrey Elliot.  Mr. Elliot died of blood poisoning after being forced to wait three weeks to be transferred from the prison to hospital after being wounded. An incident at CNCC on 4 September left two prisoners with stab wounds.
·        Dr Martin McNamara of Midland says a patient was in agony for three weeks, waiting for medical attention for his broken jaw.


After having to fight for her son Ryan’s well-being during his eight month incarceration at CNCC, Sharon Storring-Skillen formed Families Against Private Prison Abuse, (FAPPA).
Ontario and indeed Canada have never again pursued the idea of privatization.  Until now that is.  The current federal conservative government are determined to steer Canadians back down the dark road to prisons for profit.
Conservative Bill C10 Laying the groundwork for Prison Expansion and privatization
John W. Whitehead, author of Jailing Americans for Profit: The Rise of the Prison Industrial Complex, and published by the Huffington Post, April10, 2012 had this to say; “Among the laws aimed at increasing the prison population and growing the profit margins of special interest corporations like CCA are three-strike laws (mandating sentences of 25 years to life for multiple felony convictions) and "truth-in-sentencing" legislation (mandating that those sentenced to prison serve most or all of their time).” th of these – mandatory minimums and so called truth in sentencing provisions have been enacted in Canada under the conservatives despite conservative warnings from the US not to take the failed road that they have.

 
Prison related P3’s US
Giant Wall St. firms such as Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch write between two and three billion dollars in prison construction bonds every year. Swimming along- side the big fish of incarceration are schools of for-profit caterers, prison HMOs, private transport companies, architecture firms and other subcontractors that feed at the margins of the prison industrial complex.

Prison Related P3’s Canada

As of April 1, Brookfield LePage Johnson Controls will take over property management services from the B.C. Building Corp., the real-estate wing of the provincial government. The contract, awarded last December, covers almost half of the B.C. government's real estate arm and includes 10 correctional facilities.  Brookfield LePage Johnson Controls, values the deal at $90 million annually.  The Crown corporation expects to realize savings of up to $40 million per year.  The new re-build of the Surrey Detention Centre is expected to be one of the facilities under private building management.

The Toronto South Detention Centre, to replace the Don Jail, carries a price tag of over $1 billion and is being built as a “Public-Private-Partnership” (P3) with a private company to build, design and operate the 1650 bed facility for 30 years.  Retrieved from: http://basicsnews.ca/2011/12/the-mass-incarceration-agenda-in-canada-the-view-from-vancouver/

Prison Labour US

Microsoft, Starbucks, Victoria's Secret and TWA, Unicor, Dell are all known to use or have used prisoner labour in the past for penny’s a day and sometimes prisoners are not paid anything at all.  Most of these are strictly private profiteers, save Unicor which is a government corporation which profits from prisoner labour.  One particularly disgusting example of the US government using forced prisoner labour was the cleanup of the BP oil spill in Louisianna.  BP was provided tax exemptions for charitably providing work experience to these untrained prisoners to clean up a dangerous, toxic, waste dump for pennies a day. Meanwhile, practically the entire fishing economy in the area was put out of work thanks to the oil contaminated ocean.

Prison Labour Canada

To my knowledge there is no central database keeping track of the multiple human misery profiteers in Canada.  I know of two explicit prison labour contractors.  One, Corcan is operated by the federal government with a mandate to provide prisoners with paid work experience while on day passes and parole.  I have no idea how much prisoners are paid in that programme.  Though prisoners working on correctional grounds within the few industries located inside are typically paid a few dollars a day.  The federal government has recently cancelled a special incentive programme intended to provide bonuses to some workers. 

Located on Ontario government property, adjacent to the Maplehurst prison in Milton, ON is the Cook-Chill Food Preparation Centre.  It’s operated as a P3 using prisoner labour, and run by private contractor, Eurest Dining Services which is owned by Compass Group Canada Ltd.  Cook-Chill has the contract to provide 3 meals a day for prisoners at all 3 super jails in Ontario.

Fasken Martineau posted the following information about this P3 contract on their web page:
“The agreement also requires the contractor to provide skills training opportunities for inmates as part of an industrial work program during times when meals are prepared for Ontario's correctional system. Qualified inmates involved in a temporary absence program will also be able to work at the CCFPC as part of an employment initiative. All inmates involved with the CCFPC will be low risk and carefully screened. The Ministry expects that its demands will not fully use the CCFPC's production capacity. Subject to meeting the Ministry's requirements as its first priority, the contractor will be permitted to use the CCFPC's excess capacity for the production of third party sales and the province will receive a share of the revenues.”  Retrieved from http://www.fasken.com/ministry-of-correctional-services-of-ontario-enters-public-private-partnership-with-compass-group-canada/
 
Profiting From Our Misery

In considering the ideology which allows public responsibilities such as the operation of prisons to be privatized for profit we must also consider the larger capitalist system which gave birth to it.  Consider the many ways in which poverty is criminalised for instance.  Anti panhandling laws, welfare fraud, and anti-sex work law.  All of these can be considered survival income – or survival “crime”.  And perhaps none of them would be necessary if the capitalist system wasn’t set up to intentionally maintain some substantial rate of unemployment, thus keeping some people in a constant state of desperation and in survival mode, keeping others afraid to ask for more money at work, or better benefits, lest they be forced into the criminalised workforce too.  Of course these factors keep wages low, at poverty levels, allowing more people fewer choices, leading to wide spread desperation, depression, and trauma which in turn leads people to seek out means for coping, which in turn can lead to substance use issues, and to a greater use of criminalised survival strategies, which of course leads to criminalization and imprisonment. And there we have it class war, providing profits for the owning class at our expense. 
How do they get away with it?  And why do we let them?  I believe that intelligent propaganda through corporate media is key.  There are many means and methods within the misinformation campaign strategy.  The most successful tactics are perhaps those which seek to turn people from the same classes against each other by playing on fear and hate.  Turn friend against friend and neighbour against neighbour.  Lies which set the working poor against those on welfare, judgment against those who engage in survival crime by those who do not and blaming those who use drugs for all that is wrong in the lives of those who don’t.  This is a huge part of how they get away with it.  How we let them has much to do with limited access by the poor, to progressive ideas and challenges of conservative myths and ideology.  Limitations in both time and money keep many people from ever attaining access to the ideas which would set us free.

References/Resources

Canada to us lobbying

Us to Canada lobbying
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2011/06/23/251363/cca-geogroup-prison-industry/?mobile=nc

Petition sponsored by 404systemerror 

General
Rosa, E., (2009). Retrieved April 8, 2012 from: http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=15308)
Parenti, Christian, (1999).  Retrieved April 12, 2012 from: http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=852

Reports
Prison Privatization Report International (PPRI)
Report #64 detailed concerns about CNCC  (John Howard, 2006 appendex)

Friday, July 13, 2012

Updates on Bill C10 and Prison Privatisation - Multiple Sources

From oldest to newest;

http://www.cannabisculture.com/content/2012/03/13/Why-Crime-Bill-Should-be-Concern-Business

Cannibis culture, Marc Emery's online resource has been following the C10 saga from the beginning and have a dozen or more articles on the topic.

http://www.canadianprogressiveworld.com/2012/04/11/coming-to-canada-prison-industrial-complex-
punishment-and-profits/

http://wp.stu.ca/occupypapers/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/sauvageau_jean.pdf
"The Harper Government and the Criminal Law Agenda: When being “tough on crime” has nothing to do
with crime, justice nor public safety"
Author provides an interesting analysis from the perspective of a lawyer and criminologist.  He locates public safety squarely in the context of economic equality and makes his case through comparrisons of Canada, the US, and Scandenavian countries.

 http://www.canadianprogressiveworld.com/2012/07/05/enbridge-executives-company-awarded-first-bill-c-10-38-5-million-prison-project/

 http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-10/canada-studying-private-firms-for-prisons-as-budgets-fall.html

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-10/canada-studying-private-firms-for-prisons-as-budgets-fall.html

http://www.straight.com/article-732016/vancouver/spigot-circumcision-decision-germany-private-jails-canada

This last link is a humourous blog in response to some of the last articles.  Be sure to see the reader comments!


ast summer Prime Minister Stephen Harper and the Conservatives demonstrated their tough stance on foreigners suspected of war crimes abroad. The suspects were rounded up, detained and deported. The sweep was the beginning of a crackdown on immigrants that also deliberately links immigration and criminality. It laid the foundation for a future powerful private prison industry in Canada.
A few weeks ago, Harper and his Conservative majority government passed a universally-condemned, ideologically-driven new crime law, deceptively christened “Safe Streets and Communities Act”. Harper used his acquiescing majorities in the House of Commons and Senator to pass the bill without any substantial debate. Indeed, the GEO Group, a major player in the private correctional services in the US, UK, Australia and South Africa, lobbied for the new law. In the video below, Al Jazeera’s Fault Lines travels to Texas and Florida to investigate the business of immigration detention in the US and to find out how a handful of companies have managed to shape US immigration laws.

ast summer Prime Minister Stephen Harper and the Conservatives demonstrated their tough stance on foreigners suspected of war crimes abroad. The suspects were rounded up, detained and deported. The sweep was the beginning of a crackdown on immigrants that also deliberately links immigration and criminality. It laid the foundation for a future powerful private prison industry in Canada.
A few weeks ago, Harper and his Conservative majority government passed a universally-condemned, ideologically-driven new crime law, deceptively christened “Safe Streets and Communities Act”. Harper used his acquiescing majorities in the House of Commons and Senator to pass the bill without any substantial debate. Indeed, the GEO Group, a major player in the private correctional services in the US, UK, Australia and South Africa, lobbied for the new law. In the video below, Al Jazeera’s Fault Lines travels to Texas and Florida to investigate the business of immigration detention in the US and to find out how a handful of companies have managed to shape US immigration laws.
ast summer Prime Minister Stephen Harper and the Conservatives demonstrated their tough stance on foreigners suspected of war crimes abroad. The suspects were rounded up, detained and deported. The sweep was the beginning of a crackdown on immigrants that also deliberately links immigration and criminality. It laid the foundation for a future powerful private prison industry in Canada.
A few weeks ago, Harper and his Conservative majority government passed a universally-condemned, ideologically-driven new crime law, deceptively christened “Safe Streets and Communities Act”. Harper used his acquiescing majorities in the House of Commons and Senator to pass the bill without any substantial debate. Indeed, the GEO Group, a major player in the private correctional services in the US, UK, Australia and South Africa, lobbied for the new law. In the video below, Al Jazeera’s Fault Lines travels to Texas and Florida to investigate the business of immigration detention in the US and to find out how a handful of companies have managed to shape US immigration laws.

Sunday, April 8, 2012

3 Weeks Into the C10 Hunger Strike

Obert Modando is one brave soul!  I can't imagine what it must feel like to be without food for 3 weeks, but it must be very painful.  Clearly protecting his freedom and the freedom of all persons on Canadian soil is deeply, intensely important to Obert.  Please see below for Oberts demands to Parliament and law enforcement.  And please take some time to support Obert by spreading his message far and wide, talk about it with those in your life, on facebook, in your blogs, etc.  Maybe stop by Obert's Facebook page and express some words of support.


By Natalia Crowe
Retrieved from  http://groups.google.com/group/prisonersjusticetoronto/browse_thread/thread/7d5646357c9552f2#

Obert Modando is a Zimbabwe brother who was injured by police during his
arrest at Occupy Ottawa. More info about his demands and his open letter to
Parliament, delivered by MP Paul Dewar, below and at
http://www.canadianprogressiveworld.com/<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-mcaeD16ro&feature=player_embedded#>

Obert has 5 demands:

1. The Parliament of Canada should repeal the Safe Streets and Communities
Act in its entirety.
2. Former Ottawa Police chief and newly-appointed Senator, Vernon White,
should immediately resign.
3. The federal government should make a commitment to invest 100 times the
cost of monitoring and dismantling Occupy encampments across Canada last
fall to institute a national inquiry into the case of 600+ missing and
murdered aboriginal women and girls.
4. The House of Commons should immediately institute measures to improve
accountability and transparency. The measures should include limitations on
the governing party’s power to a) manipulate Standing Orders; b) evade
opposition scrutiny; c) shut down debate d) silence critics; and e) run
committees behind closed doors and prevent Canadians from participating.
5. The Conservative government must immediately stop its campaign against
Canadians and Canadian democracy. This campaign currently manifests through
a) the criminalization of dissent; b) promotion of a divisive agenda and
attitude; c) whipping up of unnecessary moral panic; and d) using
incendiary labels to stifle debate and criticism on its actions.

Links:
Canadian Progressive World: http://www.canadianprogressiveworld.com/
Obert's Facebook Profile: http://www.facebook.com/obie.mad
Obert on Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/Obiemad

C10 Hunger Striker

On Day Six of Indefinite Bill C-10 Hunger Strike, Obert Madondo Addresses Canadian MPs

Friday, March 23, 2012

Neo-Conservative Crime and Cruelty



The Safe Streets and Communities Act: Neo-Conservative Crime and Cruelty
sheryl jarvis

[People] fight for freedom, then they begin to accumulate laws to take it away from themselves.  ~Author Unknown

Summary
Demonstrates the relationships between the corporate elite, right wing governments and the structuring of public policy designed to support corporate interests, including tactics of criminalisation such as Bill C10. Will explore the riddle between conservative claims that tougher sanctions equal increased public safety, and the research which shows the opposite is more likely to be true. Also considering the reasons that could be behind this brand of dishonesty and our means for seeking out the truth. 

 Law and Order

According to Statistics Canada, 2010 closed with the 33rd consecutive drop in both the rate and the severity of crime across Canada.  Despite this, Prime Minister Stephen Harper's conservative government has reintroduced the much anticipated law and order agenda in the form of one enormous crime Bill.  Bill C10, the “Safe Streets and Communities Act” combines nine of the former Bills which had failed to pass into law previously due to opposition and repeated prorogues of parliament. 

Safe Streets and Communities: Who Wouldn’t Want That?

If locking more people up for longer periods of time made us safer this Bill would be great.  However legislating changes to behaviour has never been a successful tactic.  Despite these facts and despite how widespread resistance to Bill C10 has been, it has thus far been futile.  Sandra Chu, Senior Policy Analyst for the Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network spoke with me recently about the problem with trying to legislate behaviour changes.  She said “...we know many aspects of Bill C-10 will not work to “fight crime”, and in fact, [will] worsen prison conditions, violate prisoners’ human rights (including their right to health), destroy families and communities, and cost significant money without actually achieving public safety.”  It seems that there is no bridging the gap between conservative ideology and the truth behind community harm.  The truth is that most lawbreaking has its creation in poverty, unemployment, inequality, and trauma.  Addressing these issues requires thoughtfulness and a commitment to evidence-based practices which reflect a human rights framework.    

Precisely because Bill C10 ignores evidence and human rights, all manner of people have resisted it.  Including opposition parties, the 37,000 members of the Canadian Bar Association, 563 doctors who signed the Urban Health Research Initiative’s letter opposing Bill S10 (an earlier version of and now a portion of C10 making changes to the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act), the union representing prison guards, NUPGE, the Canadian Foundation for Drug Policy, the Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network, NORML Canada, the Toronto Harm Reduction Task Force, Pivot Legal Society, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, and the list goes on.  Represented are thousands of social workers, healthcare providers, teachers, law enforcement, and clergy who recognize the hyperbole for what it is, partisan ideology, greed, and fear. 

Neo-Conservative Ideology and Greed

Harper's political base doesn’t care much about sound statistics and proven best practices.  Especially not if these are competing with the satisfaction obtained through retribution and high profit margins.  The hang ‘em high approach has been used successfully in the past by the Harris government in Ontario.  During the 90’s they made “war on the poor”, demonizing us (as in no more free rides for lazy, drug addicted, criminals) while simultaneously cutting the services and welfare rates that could have prevented many from becoming addicted and criminalised in the first place.  Ms. Chu spoke to me about the outcome of such attitudes.  She said “[they]lead to increasing numbers of people without access to crucial care, treatment and support, increasing numbers of people feeling marginalized by society, and increasing numbers of people who will be incarcerated as a result.”

Harris’ tactics were successful because he was seen by many to be demanding nothing more than the revered traits of self-sufficiency and hard work, held dear by many Canadians.  However its important to remember that the majority of the poor, including those on social assistance would rather not be in that situation.  The same holds true for those with problematic substance use issues and those cycling in and out of our jails.  Ms. Chu suggests that in order to resist tactics that demonize the vulnerable we need to hear from the vulnerable directly. “I think it’s important to create a space for the vulnerable to speak, so they are not dehumanized.  Support them in doing so, by ensuring people who use drugs and other marginalized communities are telling their stories at media events, conferences... etc.”

Neo-Conservative Agenda Equals Increased Crime and Less Safety

Stephen Harper has claimed that Canadians are unsafe and that only by restricting our freedoms further will we achieve safety.  In fact what the Harper conservatives will likely achieve is not increased safety but an increase in that which we refer to as crime.  As our freedoms are increasingly made illegal, and social programs which stave off desperation are defunded, our “crime” rates will soar, thus justifying the prison building boom and tough on crime rhetoric.  The people of the USA have learned these lessons the hard way. 

Decades of tough on crime, war on drugs ideology translated into programs of mass incarceration.  Studies found that those communities who are most impacted, suffer increasing, as opposed to decreasing rates of “crime”.  Those left behind are forced more often to make choices between seeing their children do without necessities or engaging in “crime” in order to provide for them.  The US Drug Policy Alliance, which promotes alternatives to drug prohibition explains the US situation, "Mass arrests and incarceration of people of color, largely due to drug law violations have hobbled families and communities by stigmatizing and removing substantial numbers of men and women.”  If criminalizing and incarcerating people are known to make us less safe then why is the conservative government doing it?

Privatized Prisons

Those warehoused under the new regime will become the raw material for a profitable industry popular in the U.S., privatized, for profit prisons.  “Crime” must be increased to keep the bodies flowing on a pay per capita basis.  One of the largest prison privatization companies in the USA, the Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) noted this last point as a problem of concern in their 2010 annual report. ‘The demand for our facilities and services could be adversely affected by leniency in conviction or parole standards and sentencing practices…” CCA is the same US corporation which lobbied our Canadian government in support of Bill C10.  
Once locked up, prisoner bodies can be transformed into even more profit in the form of prisoner labour, a common practice in the US, but not yet widely used in Canada.  Free labour will be sold to 3rd parties at discounted and very profitable rates.  Corporations able to win prison contracts will gain an unfair advantage over the competition while the larger market wages are driven down.  Not to mention the impacts on the mental well being of prisoners who are treated as commodities. 

The History of Privatized Prisons in Canada

For profit prisons were attempted briefly by the Harris government in the form of a comparison experiment between two of the then newly constructed super-jails.  These new jails were devised by the Harris government to warehouse human beings as sparingly as possible.  The contract to run the Penetang jail was awarded to the US based Management and Training Corp.  While they were indeed able to save the province money on the front end, in 2006 the CBC reported that the facility had been transferred back to the state because of “inferior security”, “health care”, and an increase in rates of repeat lawbreaking.  The idea of prison privatization in Ontario has remained quite ever since.

British Columbia's P3 (Public/Private Partnerships) Craze

However BC has picked up the torch and is running with it full steam ahead.  With the creation of Partnerships BC, one of a series of such organizations operated at all levels of government across Canada, the doors to public service privatization have been flung open wide.  In BC everything from public healthcare services and utilities to longterm care facilities and prisons have been privatized or converted to a P3. 

Stephanie Seaton, a British Colombian researcher and the creator of summerlandbc.wordpress, and thieverycorp.wordpress, confirms that there is currently one finalized P3 prison contract  in the works in BC.  It involves the building and operation of a remand centre by Brookfield Properties Corporation in Surrey, BC.  
Contracts awarded to build and run prisons are not the only ones allowing firms to profit from mass criminalisation.  According to Stark Raven News, a prisoner support and education service in British Columbia there are currently P3 contracts within the provincial jail system that focus on service and supply contracts rather than prison building and maintenance.  These include for profit contracts to supply inmate canteens, food, and telephone services, healthcare, and even substance abuse programs. 
Additional prison building and maintenance P3's are being considered in Summerland and Peniticton, BC.  Both have been met with substantial opposition from the local communities, who are mainly specifying safety concerns.  Ms. Seaton is herself a Summerland, BC resident and she spoke with me by phone recently.  She raised a number of potential concerns with these kinds of partnerships including:

ñ Profit to shareholders their top priority
ñ Cost cutting to increase profits (ex: hiring fewer and less experienced staff)
ñ   For-profit facilities have a financial stake to ensure facilities operate at capacity

The problem raised here of course is that prison privatization creates an entire industry which benefits directly from the increased criminalisation and incarceration of ever expanding populations.  In the US these industries have produced powerful lobby groups which advocate for and in some cases even assist in drafting tougher crime legislation.  It has become a runaway train and very difficult to stop.

Exploitative Discrimination in Canada: Then and Now

The 21st century effort to privatize public services is not the first time we have seen a push to put public responsibilities into the hands of private institutions.  Historic policies of capitalism and colonisation resulted in the long term, mass criminalisation and marginalisation of vulnerable, aboriginal populations in Canada. 

I asked Doug King, a lawyer with Pivot Legal Society in BC what he thought about the following quote:
“Giving corporations powers over prisoners is a different matter, I would argue, much like giving churches power over residential schools” (as quoted by Keith Reynolds in a blog for the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives)

Mr. King feels that there are “parallels” between what church and state did to aboriginal families (and continue to do to this day) and what state and corporation conspire to do to vulnerable populations today.  King stated that with residential schools, the government had contracted out its policies to non-governmental institutions for the purpose of “changing behaviours.”  And that in the residential school system it had “resulted in the physical and sexual abuse of children.  He went on to say that “Prison privatization may not manifest in that form specifically, but it may show up in other forms” [of abuse].  Such as conditions related to“overcrowding”

Stephanie Seaton has a theory around the politics that can lead to these kinds of policies in the first place, “A capitalist society is based on the idolization of people, power, and things that represent money. The marginalised represent the opposite, which is perhaps why society condemns them. They are deemed to be unimportant by those in power....”

Neo-Conservative Fear

Privatization of prisons and expansion of Harper's law and order agenda is but one small piece of a larger picture.  The neo-conservative agenda has long been to privatize public resources, slash social services, and provide complete freedom for corporations while simultaneously increasing social control over individuals.  Because there are substantial disadvantages to most of us in these methods and because of the potential for resistance on the grandest of scales, the neo-conservatives fear us – that is we the 99%.  Because of this we are seeing greater restrictions to civil freedoms including our right to dissent, the erosion of worker rights, a focus on law and order, and prison expansion on a scale unprecedented in Canadian history. 



More Canadians Criminalized

One in ten Canadians currently has a criminal record (Canadian Criminal Justice Association, 2010).  The majority of whom suffer the consequent and ongoing emotional, social, familial, and financial impacts related to criminalisation.  As more Canadians are criminalised and experience encroachments on freedoms, expanded cuts to social services, and diminished hope for the future, the more desperate and angry people will become and consequently, the more ready to resist.  There is no reason why this government should feel a need to push people to such a brink of desperation.  Far more effective means exist, such as ensuring basic needs are met first and foremost.  Ms. Chu agrees, “Wouldn’t resources be better spent on education, health and social supports that have been proven to actually address the root causes of crime?” 

To ensure conservative plans for fortune and greed are not thwarted, social control must be continuously ramped up.  Judicial and prison expansion agendas, accompanied by deregulation ensure that profits through prison privatization are freer to flow.  Prison privatization is attractive to corporations because they are able to attain certain freedoms they could only dream of elsewhere in “free” society.  Prisoners often don’t have to be paid, nor are they permitted to form unions, and further many are restricted politically, forbidden to vote.  These are gifts to those who wish to see capitalism entirely unrestrained by “irritating” controls like progressive taxation, good wages, and human rights.


Capitalism, Government, and the News Media in Canada  

The major media outlets are owned and operated by just a few large corporations in Canada, which greatly restricts the diversity of news we receive.  These news conglomerates are often but one piece of a much larger pie. They are mostly owned by huge multinationals and used by their owners to influence public opinion in their own favour.  Ish Theilheimer, Publisher of the “Straight Goods”, an independent Canadian news provider, talked with me about these issues.  He said,“Traditional media tends to be dominated in their perspective by the corporations that own the outlets and conservative orthodoxy. ...too often Big Media offers the spin and lies of the wealthy interests that run the world.”  Our government like most governments is also adept in the art of spin.  Members of parliament often attend the same functions and benefits, and run in the same business circles as multinational and corporate media owners.  Their interests are the same and one supports the other.
As democratic populace we are wise to question and monitor our governments through independent news sources.  Whether they are selling off public assets, locking up those with addictions, or allowing warrant-less searches into our online activities.  We are wise to ask ourselves who stands to benefit and who stands to lose.

Taking Freedom Away from Ourselves?

Is it wise to assume that new laws or greater restrictions (regarding online privacy for example) won’t affect us personally?  Insisting that intrusions into our personal sphere are OK because as law abiding citizens we have “nothing to hide” is rather short sighted.  Where do these encroachments end?  How far can we allow our government and police forces to expand into the private realms of others before we too are affected?  The rights we now enjoy freely could suddenly be removed and made illegal.  New invasions on our freedoms when not challenged have a way of gradually intensifying until it becomes clear that we are no longer free. 

Update on Bill C10

Though the conservatives insisted they would have Bill C10 passed into law within the first 100 sitting days of parliament, it seems suddenly to have become less of a priority.  The Bill passed the final of three readings in the house of commons this past December.  Despite pressure from the Tories to have it also sail through the Senate, our Senators have insisted the Bill be given more time for research and investigation.  This may have had as much to do with political pressure from voters as with stated democratic and moral obligation.  The Safe Streets and Communities Act (C10) has passed second reading in Senate and is expected to pass into law sometime in February 2012.
There have been many campaigns, rallies, and petitions against Bill C10 and all of its earlier incarnations.  Current initiatives at  Lead Now (http://leadnow.ca/keep-canada-safe) involved rally's at offices of MP's across the country, and a letter writing campaign directed at Senators and asking them to give appropriate and fair consideration to the Bill.  Check out what others are doing to oppose C10 and other anti-prison expansion work at the Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network, www.itcouldgetworse.com, and www.avaaz.org/en/stop_harpers_cruel_crime_bill/.

More Bill C10 Information


Alternatives to Law and Order Approaches

Tracking the Politics of Crime and Punishment

Rittenhouse – A prison education organization for the public

Urban Health Research Initiative – Drug Policy in Canada
http://uhri.cfenet.ubc.ca/content/view/68/82/

Author's Biography
Sheryl Jarvis is a white, single parent, woman with a history entrenched in poverty and violence.  She has first hand knowledge of the issues surrounding problematic drug use and imprisonment, having survived both.  She is a recent college graduate, and studied social work within a philosophy of critical feminist theory and anti-oppression.  Issues important to her are harm reduction and prisoner rights for which she advocates through community organizing, committee work, and critical writing.
http://prisonstatecanada.blogspot.com/

“Locking people in cages can never make a healthier, nor safer place for any of us. Thankfully there are many smarter alternatives” sheryl jarvis, 2011