Posts about Crypto
In summary, you're exploring the relationships between different financial entities, patents related to cryptocurrency technology, and the potential implications of using tokenized securities in financial strategies. Your aim seems to be to understand the significance and potential risks of these connections and practices.
Look i know a lot of this won't exactly be any new information for a lot of people here. I just wanted to share this post I put together, and was bummed out it got removed.. I get it if it's too much to read for a lot of people here..
Some ELI3 and ELI5 near the bottom, below the black arrow.
My main question is are these patents a big deal? or am i making a mountain out of a molehill.
I don't own any crytpo. I don't know much about crypto. I come from the world of stonks. But I came across this Anchorage Digital entity. Anchorage Digital Bank Becomes First Federally Regulated Digital Asset Bank. Owned by subsidiary Anchor Labs. Which owns 16 patents in the crypto world.
Original Post i'm sorda continuing over here to try and get a better understanding of what I'm looking at and posting about. As i stopped at Anchor Labs and i wanted to look a bit more into this entity. As they own Anchorage Digital. Custodian to EDX. The crypto exchange involving the people below.
SBF testimony. Matt Huang. Paradigm, a crypto venture capital firm. Paradigm Capital Invested 1.15 billion into Citadel in 2022. Sequoia as well. Bill Gates. Tokenized Security Offerings. Fidelity, Schwab, Virtu and Paradigm working on an exchange. EDX.
๐ผ Matt Huang, co-founder, and managing partner of Paradigm, testified in a trial involving FTX and Bankman-Fried.
๐ผ Matthew Huang, Paradigm Fund GP also has a General Partner at the Ugland house.
๐ฆ Paradigm invested over $275 million in FTX.
๐ Bankman-Fried assured Paradigm that funds would be used for FTX, not Alameda, and that Alameda would have no preferential treatment on the FTX platform.
๐ค Paradigm expressed concern about FTX's lack of a board of directors but eventually invested.
๐ช Paradigm was co-founded by Fred Ehrsam, a Coinbase co-founder, and Matt Huang.
๐ Paradigm focuses on investing in crypto and Web 3-related firms.
๐ฐ Citadel Securities sold a $1.2 billion stake to venture capital firms Sequoia and Paradigm.
๐ฆ Paradigm has a stake in Coinbase.
๐ Anchorage, connected to Paradigm, is the first federally chartered crypto bank in the US.
๐ผ KKR led a $350 million Series D funding round for Anchorage.
"Anchorage Digital" refers to the services that are offered through the ***wholly-owned subsidiaries of Anchor Labs****, Inc., a Delaware corporation.*
https://i.redd.it/ri9yzu58sitb1.pnghttps://i.redd.it/d7qcwj2ntitb1.pnghttps://patents.justia.com/patent/11689366
This patent application describes a system for securely storing and managing access to cryptoassets (like cryptocurrencies) on a blockchain. The system uses hardware security modules (HSMs) to ensure the security of the stored cryptoassets and enable actions such as staking and governance protocols. Here's a simplified summary:
Cryptoassets like Bitcoin and Ethereum need a secure storage and access management system.
This system uses hardware security modules (HSMs) that securely store cryptographic keys.
Users or entities can request actions related to their cryptoassets, like staking or changing access rules for vaults.
The system verifies these requests against predefined rules for each vault.
If the request meets the rules, it is executed securely.
HSMs play a crucial role in securing and managing the private keys used for cryptoasset access.
The system can handle various actions for different cryptoassets securely and adapt to changes in protocols.
In essence, this patent is about a system that helps keep cryptoassets safe and enables certain actions while maintaining high security standards.
https://i.redd.it/dps0nbbksitb1.pnghttps://patents.justia.com/patent/11438174
The patent describes a system and method for securely storing and retrieving private keys used to control access to a blockchain or cryptoassets. The key features of this patent are as follows:
Grouped Private Keys: The system manages private keys by grouping them into different private-keys groups, with each group having an associated cryptographic group key. This grouping allows for the organization and secure management of private keys.
Multi-Level Encryption: Private keys associated with actions are stored with multiple levels of encryption. The first level of encryption uses the associated cryptographic group key, while the second level of encryption uses a hardware-based cryptographic key, typically located in a separate computer (hardware security module).
Secure Access Control: When an action is initiated, such as a deposit or withdrawal of cryptoassets, the private key is decrypted in a secure and isolated environment. The first computer decrypts the first level of encryption using the associated cryptographic group key. Then, a second computer (hardware security module) decrypts the second level of encryption using a hardware-based cryptographic key.
Digital Signing: After decryption, the private key is used to digitally sign data, authorizing the action. This signature is then sent to a third computer to execute the requested action, such as a blockchain transaction.
Air Gap Isolation: The system employs an "air gap" security measure to physically isolate the hardware security module from external networks. This isolation helps protect the private keys and sensitive operations from potential network-based attacks.
Geographic Redundancy: The patent describes the use of two or more physical data centers, each employing air gap isolation. The distribution of private-keys groups can be allocated among these data centers, and they can be placed in different geographic locations to enhance redundancy and security.
Customized Grouping: Private keys can be assigned to specific private-keys groups based on various factors, such as the amount of cryptoassets associated with each group, customer types, geographic distribution, risk profiles, and usage patterns. The system can dynamically reassign private keys to different groups as needed.
This technology is designed to enhance the security and control of cryptoassets by efficiently managing access to private keys in a custodial system. It addresses the need for secure storage and access control for cryptoassets, especially in cases where large quantities of cryptoassets are involved, and multiple users or entities require controlled access. The use of cryptographic keys, multi-level encryption, and hardware-based security modules helps protect against unauthorized access and theft of cryptoassets.
https://i.redd.it/vtwlq2fmsitb1.pngImagine you're in the world of "stonks," which is all about buying and selling shares of companies. Now, there's a different world called "crypto," where people trade digital money like Bitcoin. In this crypto world, there's a bank called Anchorage Digital that's allowed to operate by the government, the first federally regulated Digital Asset Bank, and they have some special ideas protected by 16 patents.
One of those patents is like a super secure wallet for digital money. It keeps your money safe and lets you do things with it, like earning rewards or voting on changes. Think of it like a piggy bank that only opens if you say the magic word.
Another patent is about making sure your secret key (like your password for your digital money) is extra safe. They put different locks on it, and only the right keys can open them. It's like having a treasure chest with two locks, and you need two different keys to open it.
These patents are important because they make it safe to use digital money, just like your bank keeps your money safe in the "stonks" world.
SO to connect all the dots kinda..
The reason this interests me is the name Paradigm and Citadel for now.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1679788/000120919123028859/xslF345X04/doc4.xml
https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/crypto-exchange-edx-markets-taps-152410175.html
She also attended Harvard if that matters to you
https://www.paradigm.xyz/team/katiebiber
https://www.anchorage.com/about
Citadel, Virtu, CM-Equity, IEX, Paradigm, Apollo, Sequoia, Lightspeed, CoinBase
Citadel Securities is locked in a legal battle with 2 ex-staff who left to start a crypto firm and say they're victims of 'corporate bullying'. In January 2022 Griffin sold a $1.2 billion stake in Citadel Securities to venture capital firms Sequoia and Paradigm.
Citadel CEO Peng Zhao said (THIS GUY RARELY SPEAKS) at the time the funds would help Citadel expand into new asset classes. Matt Huang the Paradigm cofounder, said that expansion would include crypto, the Financial Times reported.
Crypto Exchange Backed by Fidelity, Schwab and Citadel Launches With Additional Investors. EDX Markets has a different business model than other crypto exchanges, which regulators like, its CEO Jamil Nazarali told CoinDesk in an interview in April.
With the launch of its digital asset market comes a new round of capital which includes investments from Miami International Holdings, DV Crypto and GTS among others, the company said.
The launch follows the news just last week that asset management giant BlackRock had filed paperwork with the SEC to create a spot bitcoin ETF.
The executive leadership at EDX, the new crypto market launched by Citadel, Fidelity, Schwab, and funded by Sequoia, Virtu, Paradigm and more. These guys are connected very deeply from major market institutions, from leading divisions at Citadel to Chief legal officer at Fidelity. WTF.
https://i.redd.it/9trwrjj5titb1.pnghttps://i.redd.it/2huhjwx6titb1.pnghttps://i.redd.it/8zasott7titb1.pnghttps://i.redd.it/zz88twk8titb1.pnghttps://i.redd.it/akhc4oh9titb1.pnghttps://www.reddit.com/link/1759deq/video/87e95m6wtitb1/playerIn the context of the post you provided, "TKSX" stands for "tokenized shares" or "tokenized securities." Tokenized securities are a type of financial asset that has been digitized and represented as tokens on a blockchain or digital ledger. These tokens can represent ownership or value in traditional assets like stocks, bonds, real estate, or other financial instruments.
Tokenized securities aim to offer greater liquidity, transparency, and accessibility compared to traditional paper-based securities. They are typically issued and managed using blockchain technology, which provides a secure and immutable ledger for tracking ownership and transactions. Tokenized securities can be bought, sold, and traded on various digital asset platforms, making it easier for investors to participate in the market.
The post you provided suggests that these tokenized securities (TKSX) are being used in financial swaps involving stock. In this context, TKSX may refer to digital representations of [redacted] shares or assets that are used in complex financial transactions to offset or mitigate the risks associated with short positions in [redacted] stock. These TKSX tokens are proposed as a means to lower costs, delay market movements (like the MOASS), and manipulate the market's perception of [redacted] value. The use of TKSX in this manner raises questions about the legitimacy and implications of tokenized securities in the broader financial system.
Certainly, let's discuss the concept of tokenized securities and how it relates to crypto exchanges like EDX Markets:
Here's how this concept may relate to crypto exchanges like EDX Markets:
Tokenized Cryptocurrencies: Many crypto exchanges, including EDX Markets, offer trading in tokenized versions of cryptocurrencies. These tokens are often represented as stablecoins or wrapped tokens on blockchain platforms like Ethereum. Tokenized cryptocurrencies can be used to interact with decentralized applications (DApps) and smart contracts on the blockchain. The concept of tokenization is fundamental to how these digital assets are created and managed.
Tokenized Securities: While crypto exchanges primarily deal with digital assets native to the blockchain, they may also offer trading in tokenized securities in the future. These securities could be traditional stocks, bonds, or other financial instruments represented as tokens. This approach aims to make it easier for investors to access traditional financial markets through crypto platforms.
Regulatory Considerations: The regulatory landscape for tokenized securities and cryptocurrencies is evolving. Regulators are actively exploring how to regulate digital assets and ensure compliance with securities laws. Crypto exchanges may need to navigate a complex regulatory environment as they offer tokenized securities alongside native digital assets. EDX Markets, like other crypto exchanges, would need to consider compliance with relevant regulations.
Market Manipulation and Transparency: Just as the post mentioned the potential for market manipulation with tokenized securities in traditional markets, similar concerns can apply to crypto exchanges. Ensuring transparency and preventing market manipulation is a key consideration for exchanges dealing with tokenized assets, both traditional and digital.
Interconnected Ecosystem: Traditional financial markets and crypto markets are becoming increasingly interconnected. Some investors and institutions participate in both spaces. Innovations and practices in one sector can influence the other. Crypto exchanges like EDX Markets can serve as gateways between the traditional and crypto worlds, facilitating the exchange of assets and value between these ecosystems.
In summary, the concept of tokenized securities is relevant to crypto exchanges like EDX Markets, particularly in terms of offering tokenized versions of cryptocurrencies and potential future offerings of tokenized traditional securities. The regulatory landscape and market dynamics for these assets require careful consideration as both markets continue to evolve.
https://i.redd.it/h2gp5vvdtitb1.pngCombining the techniques discussed in the two posts, one related to the potential use of tokenized securities (TKSX) in equity swaps and the other related to the exploitation of U.S. securities in foreign exchanges through various swap mechanisms, could create a more sophisticated and potentially even more opaque strategy for certain financial entities. Here's a conceptual way in which these techniques could be combined:
Objective: The objective of combining these techniques could be to further manipulate the prices of certain securities, such as [redacted] , while minimizing regulatory scrutiny and maintaining a level of secrecy.
Step-by-Step Approach:
Creating Synthetic Ownership: Financial entities could establish synthetic ownership of the target security, such as $[redacted], through the issuance and trading of tokenized securities (TKSX). These TKSX shares represent a proxy for the real shares of $[redacted] but are less expensive and potentially more easily manipulated.
Utilizing Equity Swaps: The financial entity could then enter into equity swap contracts with counterparties. These swaps would involve an exchange of returns on the synthetic $[redacted] ownership (TKSX shares) for returns on a basket of other securities or financial instruments held by the counterparty. This arrangement effectively transfers exposure to $[redacted]to the counterparty.
Complex Swap Structures: To add complexity and make it harder to trace, multiple layers of swaps could be used. For example, the financial entity might engage in total return swaps (TRS), credit default swaps (CDS), or other derivatives to further obscure the true nature of their positions.
Foreign Exchange Exploitation: Simultaneously, the financial entity could exploit foreign exchanges or markets where regulatory oversight may be weaker. They could establish positions in these markets using synthetic ownership, making it harder for regulators to track their activities.
Opacity and Privacy: The financial entity could prioritize opacity and privacy in these transactions, using offshore entities and complex legal structures to shield their activities from public scrutiny.
Market Manipulation: Through their positions in TKSX, combined with the leverage offered by equity swaps and derivatives, the financial entity could engage in market manipulation strategies, such as short squeezes, or exert influence on the price of the target security.
Regulatory Challenges: The combination of these techniques could pose significant regulatory challenges due to their complexity and potential for opacity. Regulators may struggle to trace the true exposure of the financial entity and assess the risk they pose to the market.
Public Awareness and Accountability: As in the second post, raising public awareness of such strategies and demanding accountability from regulators could be crucial in mitigating the impact of these tactics.
What countries would they likely establish these positions in to further obscure from regulators. and what would be the purpose of including the TKSX in the process
https://i.redd.it/q645ikhftitb1.pngEstablishing positions in certain countries to further obscure activities from regulators would depend on several factors, including the legal and regulatory environment in those countries, the level of financial transparency, and the ease of conducting financial transactions with minimal scrutiny. Here are some countries that have been associated with financial secrecy and could be considered for such purposes:
Switzerland: Switzerland is historically known for its strong banking secrecy laws, although it has been making efforts to increase transparency in recent years. It has a well-developed financial sector and could be used for certain financial transactions.
Cayman Islands: This offshore financial center is known for its lack of direct taxation and strong privacy protections. It's a popular destination for setting up offshore entities.
Luxembourg: Luxembourg has a well-established financial sector and a history of banking secrecy. It's also an attractive location for certain financial services.
Singapore: Singapore offers a stable financial environment and has banking secrecy laws that could be attractive to certain entities. It's a major financial hub in Asia.
Hong Kong: Hong Kong has a strong financial sector and is often used as a gateway to Asian markets. It has a degree of financial privacy.
Panama: Panama has long been associated with offshore banking and has laws that provide a high level of financial privacy.
The purpose of including tokenized securities (TKSX) in the process could be multifaceted:
Cost Efficiency: TKSX shares may be more cost-effective than acquiring and holding actual shares of the target security. This can reduce the financial exposure and collateral requirements associated with certain transactions.
Secrecy and Opacity: TKSX shares can be used to obscure the true ownership of a security. Since these tokenized shares may be held in digital wallets and not linked directly to the entity's identity, it adds a layer of anonymity and opacity.
Regulatory Arbitrage: TKSX can be used to exploit regulatory differences between traditional securities and tokenized securities. Regulatory oversight of digital assets may be less stringent in some jurisdictions, making it easier to use them for certain financial transactions.
Liquidity and Access: TKSX shares may provide liquidity and access to markets that might not be available with traditional securities. This can be particularly useful when establishing positions in foreign markets.
Complex Financial Structures: TKSX can be integrated into complex financial structures, including equity swaps and derivatives, to create intricate financial instruments that are challenging for regulators to trace and understand.
It's important to emphasize that while these strategies are theoretically possible, engaging in such activities would raise significant legal and regulatory concerns. Regulators in various countries are continuously working to enhance transparency and prevent market manipulation. Violations of financial regulations and laws can result in severe penalties, including fines and imprisonment. Therefore, any entity considering such strategies should be aware of the legal and ethical implications and seek expert legal advice.
Ah shit here we go again.
https://i.redd.it/7l2wfv2otitb1.pnghttps://i.redd.it/99nyobyotitb1.pnghttps://i.redd.it/ulagmdlrtitb1.pnghttps://i.redd.it/zte349kstitb1.pnghttps://i.redd.it/4gmtqtcttitb1.pngThink of your computer coins like candy. There are companies that keep your candy safe. Some of these companies are friends with other big candy stores. They use special locks to keep your candy safe with secret codes. These candy stores are connected to a secret candy market.
Now, some people want to get more candy, so they play a tricky game with fake candy and hide it in secret places. They also use special fake candy that looks like real candy. But remember, playing tricks with candy can get you in trouble! It's like a big puzzle with rules, and some people try to solve it in a tricky way.
Imagine you have special digital money (crypto) and you want to keep it safe. There are companies that help with this. They're connected to other big companies and sometimes invest in them.
Some smart people also invented ways to make sure this digital money is super safe. Think of it like putting it in a super-duper lockbox.
These companies are doing complicated things to make money, like trading stocks, and sometimes they use tricky methods to do it. They might even use fake money and go to secret places where nobody watches closely. They also use special digital versions of real stocks to make it all more complicated and secretive.
It's kind of like playing a very tricky game with lots of rules, and some people are trying to win by bending those rules a little bit. But bending the rules too much can get them into trouble with the grown-ups (regulators). So, it's a bit like a puzzle, and some people are trying to solve it in a tricky way.
Remember, it's important to be good and follow the rules, or you might get into trouble!
Hopefully I'm not breaking any rules here...
https://i.redd.it/5qpec0ds7jtb1.pngIn your compiled post, you seem to be exploring the intersection of the traditional financial world and the world of cryptocurrency, particularly focusing on a company called Anchorage Digital and its patents. Here's the main idea:
You're trying to understand the significance of Anchorage Digital, which is a bank in the cryptocurrency world that is regulated by the government. This bank owns 16 patents related to cryptocurrency technology.
You're also interested in how Anchorage Digital is connected to other companies and entities in both the traditional and crypto financial spaces. You mention Paradigm, Citadel Securities, and others in this context.
You're curious about the concept of tokenized securities and their potential use in financial transactions, and you highlight how they could be employed to manipulate markets and raise questions about the legitimacy of these practices.
You're raising awareness about the complexity and potential risks of combining various financial techniques, emphasizing the need for transparency and regulatory oversight.
The redacteds weren't meant for this sub and i'm lazy about fixing them all. I guess other subs have rules about using ChatGPT to post though ๐ค So i'm sharing here instead.