×
top 200 commentsshow 500

[–]chiwalfrm 77 points78 points  (19 children)

Nobody cares if fees and transactions are too high..That's not Bitcoin's use from a long time, and we all know it.

BTC fees did not pass $1 until March 2017. That is not a long time ago. It was perfectly usable as currency until 8 months ago. Before 2017, it was below 40 cents. Source: https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-transactionfees.html

[–][deleted]  (10 children)

[deleted]

    [–]amorpisseur 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    When you pay $0.01 fee, who do you think pays the miners that added your transactions in a block?

    On Bitcoin, it's now inflation+fees. On Bitcoin Cash, it's fully paid by the inflation (the fees are peanuts). What do you think will happen if Bitcoin Cash is successful enough to handle VISA level transactions: 2000/s?

    [–]meiuqer 120 points121 points  (52 children)

    As someone who just got into cryptocoins, these heavily argumented discussions are very interesting but oh so confusing. Everyone talks like they know best, and it makes sense, but then the next guy comes with a counter argument which also makes sense. And i know too little of it to know who's right.

    Ah well, keep on reading i guess

    [–]lostnfoundaround 55 points56 points  (37 children)

    That is exactly how it seems - at first. Keep reading and learning more about all positions and what the terminology means. Then before you know it you will form your own opinion and can be one of the shouting internet people as well.

    [–]meiuqer 63 points64 points  (2 children)

    and can be one of the shouting internet people as well.

    a man can dream

    Edit: someone popped my reddit gold cherry, feels nice. Thx!

    [–]NeonWasteland 2 points3 points  (1 child)

    /u/tippr gild

    [–]tippr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    u/meiuqer, your post was gilded in exchange for 0.00277538 BCH ($2.50 USD)! Congratulations!


    How to use | What is Bitcoin Cash? | Who accepts it? | Powered by Rocketr | r/tippr
    Bitcoin Cash is what Bitcoin should be. Ask about it on r/btc

    [–]ItsYaBoyFalcon 21 points22 points  (31 children)

    I'm personally moving towards the... Other side from this sub.

    [–]ric2b 32 points33 points  (27 children)

    Which is honestly the correct side.

    Bitcoin still does perfectly well the most important things, the ones we have no alternative for: be censorship resistant and secure from government/bank confiscation.

    This sub loves to rave about day to day payments and I want it too, everyone does, but the ones on the Bitcoin side don't want to sacrifice/risk those two things I just said in order to make it happen right now. It doesn't need to happen right now.

    The improvements are coming, Bitcoin will keep getting better and better and eventually it'll do day to day payments and even more, without sacrificing what makes Bitcoin, Bitcoin, along the way.

    [–]KarmaPenny 12 points13 points  (25 children)

    how does increasing the block size make bitcoin vulnerable to censorship and government/bank confiscation?

    [–][deleted] 29 points30 points  (22 children)

    The argument is related to whether people can run full nodes or not. larger block sizes means more initial sync time, more ongoing bandwidth and processing power. A lot of people interpret "I think people should be able to run full nodes" as "I think that everyone should run one". Personally I don't want to be in a situation where it's unfeasible for a motivated average user to verify the full chain as Bitcoin would then, in my opinion, lose its trustlessness. Others disagree. Small blockers tend to favour layer 2 solutions like lightning networks.

    The argument most people have in here is a variation of "moore's law, as bitcoin grows, bandwith and harddisk space will get cheaper in tandem" or "no-one really needs to run a full node anyway except miners and large transaction processors/businesses, the rest can use SPV wallets (which only download the block headers and the details of relevant transactions)". Big blockers tend to feel that in practise, lightning networks would not be all that peer-to-peer and would centralise on payment-processor hubs.

    I fall on the small blocker side of things, but that's the best non-biased answer I can give. Those of us who are intellectually honest will admit this is by no means a completely settled debate on either side.

    The very angry people in here are angry because they feel they're prevented from having the discussion in /r/bitcoin and bitcointalk. They're justified in this, even if I tend to disagree with them on most other things.

    [–]doctorjay_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Learn, learn, and learn. Reddit subs are naturally biased- which is Ok. Shills on facebook- which is expected. News sites- just churning out hype. So try and find unbiased opinions that are about education, and the technology. Queue shameless promotion, but we're trying to create a safe and unbiased learning environment.

    [–]W111n 129 points130 points  (52 children)

    I've made some very poor choices in the past five days:

    1. I dumped BTC while it was free-falling, thinking that a correction was coming.
    2. I didn't sell BCH when it was over $2k.
    3. I kept my short positions on ETH open.

    Compared to the upside, I've lost $15k.

    All because I was bearish on BTC.

    [–]rmvaandr 37 points38 points  (1 child)

    Well at least you are facing up to (and learning from) your own mistakes. Most people dig themselves in deeper (sunk cost fallacy). So kudos to you. You will be fine.

    [–]lostnfoundaround 19 points20 points  (8 children)

    I think a lot of us are in this camp as well, you're far from alone here. We must keep our eyes to the future.

    [–]Exotemporal 29 points30 points  (3 children)

    Exactly, hating and abandoning BTC because you like BCH is incredibly shortsighted and dangerous since BTC remains the gold standard of cryptocurrencies. Keeping both is the most reasonable thing to do and it isn't crazy to offload the underdog if you're convinced that it doesn't have and will never have the potential to replace BTC. If BTC suddenly increased the block size, BCH would instantly become completely pointless. Going 100% BCH isn't a risk worth taking right now.

    [–]Mordan 17 points18 points  (1 child)

    oh man if all those useful idiots who follow Roger Ver could understand your post. but nah... .CORE CENSORHSHIP hahahahahahahaa

    [–]bkunzi01 4 points5 points  (0 children)

    I still can't believe people are confused by these events...I know most of the people that were lured into Ver's bch pump are new to the scene but this was far too obvious. There is a reason most people in our community see Ver as bitcoin judas. The worst part is that this pump worked amazingly well for him and now he's probably cashed out his entire 3 months of bch accumulation on you guys and reloaded his btc arsenal...

    [–]brintal 37 points38 points  (4 children)

    I really do hope some people will realize now that the players responsible for this pump&dump are not good for BCH, BTC or Crypto in general...

    [–]yeniceri 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    These guys did it once. Finex/Tether.to are doing it everyday. Check out the printed fake money as a daily recovery pack on omni explorer.

    [–][deleted]  (7 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]GhastlyParadox 10 points11 points  (3 children)

      Yup, same. Got lucky catching it at 680, just as the pump was taking off, and bought more as it kept going up. Watched it hit 2200, and went to bed without selling. Woke up, and the dump was already well underway :(

      Lesson learned.

      [–][deleted] 16 points17 points  (1 child)

      never sleep is the lesson learned :)

      [–]michalpk 15 points16 points  (1 child)

      Hopefully you will think for yourself next time before blindly following Roger. Does he still have that waiting sitting at 0.1 BTC ? Why he isn't buying now? He was very keen to make it public he moved BTC to exchange but I haven't seen any proof of him buying even one BCH

      [–]bkunzi01 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      What's incredible is that 5 billion dollars flooded into bch over the weekend so you Ver and Jihan dumped their 4 months of accumulating bch at 300$ lol I was hoping to be rid of Ver with this split but now I'm sure he has more btc than when he started...

      [–]WippleDippleDoo 2 points3 points  (1 child)

      RemindMe! 2 years "paid public sentiment shaper"

      [–]mwdeuce 2 points3 points  (1 child)

      Over the last 4 months of heavy crytpo trading and research, my biggest take aways have been these:

      1. BTC has the highest probability of continuous growth, it's the safe play
      2. If you're going to trade alts, move profits into BTC, Increasing your BTC should always be the goal. Most big alt movements are pumps that will not last.
      3. You're probably going to lose money if you step out of BTC for any length of time.

      [–]JonathanSilverbloodJonathan#100, Jack of all Trades 99 points100 points  (33 children)

      Do you remember when Marcus and Willy was buying bitcoins on MtGox without paying the sellers?

      Do you remember when bitfinex and tether printed out a parabolic amount of USDT and timed the entry to crypto at every single bear sign, while still allowing the merchants to trade with themselves to walk the price up in a giant price manipulation scheme that will make MtGox look bad?

      Oh wait, that's now.

      [–][deleted]  (14 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]JonathanSilverbloodJonathan#100, Jack of all Trades 37 points38 points  (4 children)

        Yes, markets are more complex than to have a single point of change; but most investors are followers who acts without critical thinking.

        When tethers broke every single correction and prevented a health growth, a pattern emerged in which people think it will only go up; because it has only gone up.

        Institutional investers going into bitcoin at it's most controversial turmoil in history doesn't seem particulary credible.

        I'm just honestly afraid that this bubble has no underlying fundamentals and will eventually burst. Even non-crypto bubbles that grows on speculation bursts; this is nothing special or uncommon.

        Furthermore, I'm not blaming it only on tether, I am blaming it on a combination of tether issuance, wash trading and a large information control campaign.

        Some of it is speculation, some of it is facts that can be looked up.

        [–]KoKansei 15 points16 points  (3 children)

        Yeah, agreed that Bitcoin Core is in a bubble. The only question is, how much bigger will it expand until it pops?

        Whatever the case, the "information control campaign" (good way of putting it) is definitely a contributing factor to the current bubble.

        [–]JonathanSilverbloodJonathan#100, Jack of all Trades 9 points10 points  (0 children)

        The real question is, how will #BitcoinCore perform during a bearmarket after the fact, when #BitcoinCash exists and is designed to effectively compete for the hashing capacity?

        [–]jayAreEee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        I have a feeling CME with wall street derivatives being issued on BTC futures, there could be some dark shadows cast over crypto. For better or worse is left to be seen, but I don't put all my eggs in one basket with all these recent developments.

        [–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (5 children)

        Tether is actually a tangible issue compared to "Roger and Jihan are the devil" nonsense however.

        Nearly $600 Million in Tether has been created at this point. They invented a fiat to trade against that is not directly linked to any fiat bank to withdraw to, which is simply fraudulent any way you look at it.

        While I agree in some ways the issue is overblown by some, but still significant and cannot be ignored either. I think this will end up blowing up in their faces eventually.

        [–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

        Dumb money is propping up btc and will continue making it soar. Financial organisations that manage massive retirement funds have already expressed that they will buy into Bitcoin as soon as futures become available. Bch will never pass btc. The second pensions and 401ks hop into Bitcoin it will never come back down unless the exchange crashes again. And in that event it will probably still soar due to the American economy not being sole economy Bitcoin is based on.

        [–]phd-oak 19 points20 points  (5 children)

        This is the wallet that creates new tether https://omniexplorer.info/default.aspx?filter=grant

        You can see that 40M new tether were created from 9/7 to 9/8 right before a 30% drop in bitcoin price. You can also see another 60M were created between 9/10-9/11 and what followed was another 8% down day for bitcoin on the 12th. In fact if you plot tether issuance against the bitcoin price you find no real correlation that would provide someone with a tradable edge.

        Sometimes the price goes up and some times it goes down, but tether issuance does not seem to have a direct affect on that.

        [–]JonathanSilverbloodJonathan#100, Jack of all Trades 10 points11 points  (3 children)

        if you plot it over time, you will have averaged the price hiding the individual trades. This obfuscates the data.

        You might want to stroll through bitfinexed's twitter feed, and challenge him on these points; then report back with the findings.

        https://twitter.com/Bitfinexed

        Doing so, will give us a stronger peer-review and a broader perspective; and anyone willing to look at things from a new angle and re-evaluate is someone I want to encourage to take part in this ecosystem.

        u/tippr $5

        [–]phd-oak 4 points5 points  (0 children)

        Right it doesn't mean they create more and instantly market buy bitcoin with it.

        [–]senond 4 points5 points  (4 children)

        I...i would like to know more..?

        [–]JonathanSilverbloodJonathan#100, Jack of all Trades 15 points16 points  (2 children)

        The marcus and willy bots; an introduction: https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin_s_slick_willy_insider_bots_behind_the_bitcoin_bubble

        The bitfinex/tether accusations and related data is much more spread out and hard to compile into a small consice read (since not all of it can be proven without getting insider information from bitfinex), but a good start is here:

        https://medium.com/@bitfinexed

        Now go learn more! (and share your findings if they're original :D)

        u/tippr $3

        [–]tippr 6 points7 points  (1 child)

        u/senond, you've received 0.00278921 BCH ($3 USD)!


        How to use | What is Bitcoin Cash? | Who accepts it? | Powered by Rocketr | r/tippr
        Bitcoin Cash is what Bitcoin should be. Ask about it on r/btc

        [–]fiah84 87 points88 points  (45 children)

        Sub $1000? That's still higher than bitcoin was just one year ago, with lower fees too

        [–]cluster4 56 points57 points  (14 children)

        You can dump your own coin with zero fees or just use dogecoin. Fact: The more a network is used the more higher the fees rise. We can't escape that. After a 8MB block one needs a 100MB block, then 1GB blocks etc. It might be possible to scale the network to the size of VISA or paypal. But that's not what people with a vision have in mind. We want microtransactions and single Satoshi transactions. We want THE internet of money, the primary network for value. And that means that value is streamed, not like today sent in blocks of cash or in monthly bill payments. It means realtime money transfer. That network needs to be able to process around 106 the number of transactions VISA handles daily. No block size increase will fix that. We will need higher layers on top of a secure value store for that matter.

        If you want/need to spend money in crypto today use Bitcoin Cash, Dogecoin, Litecoin etc. But that's obvious and doesn't even need to be said, because no one will pay super high fees for a coffee. Bitcoin (BTC) takes it slow with increasing the blockchain's size, because it envisions something much greater than what we have today and sees every coffee transaction written in the blockchain as a waste of space. It's a completely different approach, but it has it's right to exist. Of course every investor takes the risk that something like lightning will never work as envisioned, so it is still a very risky investment.

        [–]fiah84 7 points8 points  (11 children)

        If a super scalable payment system like the envisioned LN is going to happen, there is no guarantee it will only happen on Bitcoin. When you see yourself opening an LN channel, do you think you'd rather do it on a network where it's nearly free to do so, or on a network where the fee is more than $100? The expensive network will have to have some very enticing characteristics for me to pay that kind of fee, which is in my opinion currently not the case for Bitcoin. I don't know what the future will bring, but judging by bitcoin's past I don't expect that to change in the near future

        [–][deleted] 21 points22 points  (6 children)

        I'm just a daytrader, so I'm not a fanatic supporter of any specific coin. But I'm always scratching my head at why you guys are so confident in BCH. Sure ok maybe it is superior to BTC but...so are tons of other coins. IOTA for example seems like the most cutting edge. So what makes BCH special other than the fact it can pull hashpower away from BTC?

        [–]Nephelophyte 2 points3 points  (0 children)

        I think it's about taking on Core for having changed bitcoin's technical road map

        [–][deleted]  (279 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]bitscavenger 31 points32 points  (3 children)

          Not just Xapo/GBTC, but also Bitmex. I know the GBTC portion of that is at least $2million worth every day. I don't know how much the others have but if we assume this is $4million worth of BCH being sold every day without thought of consequence or care of profit that is a huge downward pressure. Parent showed that this was $10million today from one source. I would say "this is a great time to pick up cheap BCH" but honestly this just started and I assume BCH will get cheaper before this is over. My current plan (which could change because this crap is going to last another 80 days I think) is to pick up BCH when it is cheaper.

          My real concern is watching the hash rate comparison. After this difficulty adjustment change I was hoping to see a lot more support from miners and I don't really see that quite yet.

          The last thing is that the news coming out for bitcoin (Square and Jim Cramer blathering on about it) is extremely positive right now. And lets face it, to every new person that comes in, bitcoin is BTC and that is it.

          [–]WippleDippleDoo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

          SHA256 miners jumped over only for the short term profit. (Daa exploit)

          Also, consider that miners deliberately inflated the fees on CrippleCoin.

          I'm starting to think that miners deliberately played along with dividing the community.

          Personally, I don't see any reason for holding a token for a payment network that chokes above 4tx/s.

          [–]BitcoinopolyModerator - /R/BTC 59 points60 points  (18 children)

          If you are going by that data as selling points, then Xapo sold 97,000 BCH on or soon after 9/25, but the price chart for the last week of September was as flat as a board. During that time the volume averaged around 10% of what it is today.

          [–]E7ernal 3 points4 points  (0 children)

          It was also a lot lower. There are going to be more buyers at that price to absorb it.

          [–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (2 children)

          How stupid must they feel to sell that much and then it goes on a bull run. They lost a potential 180 mil at the top and right now at least 40.

          [–]bitscavenger 8 points9 points  (0 children)

          They don't feel stupid at all and that is the point. It is not their money. They are going off a prescribed plan because that is legally the safest thing to do while still being as easy as possible for them. They are telling their customers that BCH is pennies from heaven and just be glad you get something. They are liquidating to be relieved of liability.

          [–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (4 children)

          Don't forget BitMEX will be selling its customers previously locked up BCH and crediting customers BTC (Source).

          On or before 31 December 2017:​

          The amount of Bitcoin Cash a user is entitled to is determined by their Margin Balance at 1 August 2017 13:17 UTC, a few seconds after block 478,588.

          Users will not receive Bitcoin Cash, rather BitMEX will sell all users’ Bitcoin Cash, and credit their wallet with the Bitcoin proceeds.

          Long-term fundamentals look good for BCH.

          [–]OneMillionBCC 6 points7 points  (3 children)

          They have fewer than 10000to sell. At that time I remember a lot of funds were transferred out because they will not give us BCH. And the daily outstanding contract of btc was not like now, the quantity is like 20000btc for swap and future combined.

          [–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

          Thank you for identifying this.

          [–]Azeroth7 32 points33 points  (13 children)

          Piggybacking to answer another point of this message.

          I said it before and I will say it again, the "buy wall" or "sell wall" are there to simulate the intention of sell/buy but not there to actually be acted upon. This is known as spoofing and is illegal in regulated markets, it is defined as :

          the illegal practice of bidding or offering with intent to cancel before execution.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spoofing_%28finance%29

          [–]the-realFakeNews 24 points25 points  (6 children)

          forex and stock trading is already filled with the most immoral type of human beings and that's a regulated market.

          Now if you are a criminal there and you get caught, they will probably take what you have.

          Now crypto exchanges are a dream for any immoral human being cause if you do it properly, even if you get caught you can walk away with a fat stack of crypto that nobody can take away from you.

          So, do I like crypto? Ofcourse, exciting new technology and will change how we see money.

          Do I like crypto exchanges? Ofcourse, this greedy side of human beings is what made bitcoin possible in the first place.

          But be careful cause you are playing a game and the game will never be fair.

          [–]mongo_chutney 9 points10 points  (1 child)

          100% agree. As much as crypto was supposed to break away from banks, we can't break away from human nature. People are always going to try and game the system, no matter what system it is

          [–]the-realFakeNews 2 points3 points  (0 children)

          At least with crypto (most crypto, monero is kind of an exception) there is now a side to the game that will be open for everybody. Unlike with internal bank shenanigans anybody can at least see the bitcoin ledger.

          [–]WikiTextBot 9 points10 points  (0 children)

          Spoofing (finance)

          Spoofing is a disruptive algorithmic trading entity employed by traders to outpace other market participants and to manipulate commodity markets. Spoofers feign interest in trading futures, stocks and other products in financial markets creating an illusion of exchange pessimism in the futures market when many offers are being cancelled or withdrawn, or false optimism or demand when many offers are being placed in bad faith. Spoofers bid or offer with intent to cancel before the orders are filled. The flurry of activity around the buy or sell orders is intended to attract other high-frequency traders (HFT) to induce a particular market reaction such as manipulating the market price of a security.


          [ PM | Exclude me | Exclude from subreddit | FAQ / Information | Source | Donate ] Downvote to remove | v0.28

          [–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

          No. Spoofing occurs when the fake quotes are the best bid and offer. It is a high frequency trading strategy.

          When the "walls" are many percentage points away from the best bid and offer it is not spoofing. These "walls" are there to take advantage of flash crashes if they occur.

          [–]somewhatstaid 55 points56 points  (30 children)

          After this is over, expect for BCH to pump again.

          My paranoia is starting to set in.

          Cue unfounded speculation.

          I'm suspecting that BCH was split off from Core specifically so that the big names could play a little political theater; they'll split the faithful into two camps, fire up the rhetoric, coordinate their announcements and forks etc to keep the volatility swinging so that they can just keep playing the peaks and troughs, scooping up coins from all the clueless new traders entering the system.

          /speculation

          [–]sfink06 28 points29 points  (5 children)

          Thank you!

          This whole behavior of voluntarily splitting into camps and mindlessly throwing around slurs like "segshit" and "btrash" is unbelievably stupid. The fight between core and bch promoters is hurting everyone except the people rich/connected enough to game the system.

          [–]k1r0vv 6 points7 points  (0 children)

          lol i thought i’m the only one thinking this may be a machiavellic staged play

          [–]chainxor 9 points10 points  (16 children)

          Remember those that split away from Core are libertarians. BUT I think you are right about the BTC camp having been taken by people with interests that are more aligned with the traditional financial sector.

          [–][deleted] 116 points117 points  (136 children)

          And what do you honestly think is going to happen as more exchanges will unlock their BCH to their customers..?

          BCH will go down and be (likely) converted to BTC, as it is being done now. Or do you honestly believe that those customers will rush into buying more BCH..?

          Look, whoever wanted to buy BCH, did so at this point. But many people that wanted to sell BCH haven't been able to do so.

          [–]-Seirei- 38 points39 points  (29 children)

          At some point everyone that wants to sell their BCH will have done so. The rest of the people that will be left are the ones that hold it and the ones that use it. That's when it can rise without anyone keeping it down by selling boatloads of it.

          [–]garlichead1 16 points17 points  (6 children)

          i had them on a paper wallet and was way too lazy to sell them. i finally did it 3 days ago.

          [–][deleted]  (2 children)

          [deleted]

            [–]-Seirei- 11 points12 points  (1 child)

            Okay which part of future tense do you not get? I never said they already did. I said that at some point they will have.

            [–]humboldt_wvo 5 points6 points  (0 children)

            which part of future tense do you not get?

            apparently future perfect tense

            [–]dogbunny 13 points14 points  (0 children)

            Look, whoever wanted to buy BCH, did so at this point.

            I think you are off on this point, not all people rushed into buying as soon as they could. Bitcoin network congestion is still causing issues for people wanting to unload their BTC. Others, choose the prudent method of buying-in via dollar cost averaging. The same exchanges that are limiting people's ability to sell off their BCH are the same exchanges limiting others from buying it. I've halted my weekly buy orders of BTC, while waiting for the exchange to start offering BCH.

            This price volatility is absolutely nothing Bitcoin hasn't seen before.

            If you are honestly saying "this level of dumping has never been seen before in crypto", it just sounds like you haven't been around long enough. The Bitcoin rollercoaster is as old as Bitcoin.

            edit: a word

            [–]MildlySerious 21 points22 points  (68 children)

            I think it's worth mentioning at that point that a dropping price does not diminish the usability of BCH. Sure, mightn't be the best money grabber right now, but that should at best tell you not to drop your life savings into it. Not to assume it's failing.

            Look at BCH as a currency, not a store of value ;-)

            [–][deleted] 98 points99 points  (43 children)

            You realize that currencies are textbook examples of store of value, right?

            What you say makes no sense. If I buy BCH now and I can buy 1/4th of the shit I could buy by buying bitcoins what's the better investment option?

            Sure, BCH might be more usable, but in the end, why would I give two fucks?

            Litecoin, Monero, Ethereum are much more usable than both Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash, why would I have to prefer Bitcoin Cash then?

            Because of the hope it was going to retain certain value, but this value is going down.

            You can sugar coat is as much as you want but the current surge and dump of BCH just gives credits to whoever called it a pump and dump.

            In the end Ver and Wu haven't bought any of their Bitcoins, where are their BCHs tho?

            [–]MildlySerious 16 points17 points  (2 children)

            You're putting words in my mouth. Maybe try taking what I said at face value.

            I'm not talking about buying BCH now, waiting for a month, and then spending it. You know what currencies are good for that? Fiat. No crypto has the stability needed to reliably use it that way. None. You can't buy $400 of X and spend $400 on a Switch a month later. Sure, some might be worth more after the month, but you and I both have no idea which ones that might be. We don't know if your $400 in BTC might be worth $300 thirty days from now, nor do we know if your BCH are going to be worth that much. I wasn't saying that, and it wasn't the point of my comment to begin with.

            If you want to place a bet, sure, Bitcoin might be a better bet. Still a bet, though.

            As for why you would give two fucks: Because if you don't, the point of cryptocurrency might have gone lost on you while browsing /r/Bitcoin or whatever. The core of the conversation is still about taking power away from banks, not to get rich quick. Hence, the price shouldn't matter as much as the parent comment implied. That's what we should focus on. Not on monthly gains.

            Also the conversation is about BCH, so yeah, I went with that. Duh. The point holds up for other, working, crypto as well of course. You're right about that, but if you want derailed conversations in the form of "What about X", maybe go check T_D

            [–]lostnfoundaround 7 points8 points  (0 children)

            T_D? Edit: Okay I understand now

            [–]Quantainium 2 points3 points  (0 children)

            If you're going to buy something with crypto just buy it on whatever day you feel that crypto is strongest. Oh 5 years from now if you would of just hodl all of it you would have millions. So what. If Noone spends them and everyone hodls it is only a bubble and will pop.

            [–]Vincents_keyboard 22 points23 points  (38 children)

            Why use such strong words like crashing?

            It's easing back.

            It will continue to grow for sure, it has increasing usability. Not to mention exchanges like BitMEX are even cheating their customers out of the BCH to keep themselves. :D

            [–]Zer000sum 8 points9 points  (0 children)

            Yes, BCH is 60% higher in USD then one week ago ($625 to $1025)... and people are rolling out every crazy conspiracy theory. How about taking personal responsibility for buying BCH in the middle of a pump at $1500 or more?

            [–][deleted]  (9 children)

            [deleted]

              [–]taipalag 27 points28 points  (1 child)

              You must be new to crypto

              [–][deleted] 17 points18 points  (4 children)

              Wall Street metrics do not apply here

              [–]Casimir1904 2 points3 points  (0 children)

              It was 0.08x BTC few days back...
              I keep increasing my holdings with all those weak hands...

              [–]JonathanSilverbloodJonathan#100, Jack of all Trades 4 points5 points  (2 children)

              Great find, can you also share a link that shows the address relation to Xapo/GBTC?

              u/tippr $1

              [–]AManInBlack2017 3 points4 points  (2 children)

              By your example, only 10 more days of 15% daily losses .... Better to sell now and buy back when that account is emptied, right?

              [–]kimjongok 48 points49 points  (25 children)

              Well if you want an answer you dont want to hear. BCH has no unique selling point. It isnt the fastest, the most secure or the cheapest crypto. Literally the only thing it has going for itself is Bitcoin in its name. I honestly would like to know your opinion why you wouldnt switch to something with better tech? Like Ethereum. (Also i can feel the downvotes already since "omg fucking shill"). What is your legitimate reasons for staying with a technologically inferior coin with a smaller dev community and no roadmap that actually solves long term problems such as block rewards tending towards zero, which will just drive up tx fees since miners will have to be subsidized. Sure a lot of people will claim "but the price will just match it". In 2020 Bitcoin minning will already consume as much electricity as the country of Denmark. PoW is simply not sustainable... Id actually really like an answer that isnt rooted in random conspiracies if possible.

              [–]adangert 8 points9 points  (9 children)

              As seen from the btc price, brand is really all that matters

              [–]kimjongok 13 points14 points  (3 children)

              Well, BCH doesnt have the real brand and it doesnt have the technical superiority. How could it ever outperform better coins or better branded coins. I dont understand how people are so die hard one currency.

              [–]amorpisseur 6 points7 points  (4 children)

              If you deeply think Bitcoin is valued $130B because of the brand, I suggest you to stop investing. Anywhere.

              It's just a suggestion though.

              [–]adangert 3 points4 points  (3 children)

              Well yeah brand and network effect, the infrastructure for bitcoin is larger than anything out there.

              [–]jessquit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

              In 2020 Bitcoin minning will already consume as much electricity as the country of Denmark.

              you don't understand the technology at all. energy consumption is orthogonal to transaction throughput. If bitcoin miners were producing gigabyte blocks today, we'd all marvel at how amazingly efficient it is. the only reason mining is inefficient is because the block size limit prevents it from ever becoming more efficient. It will only ever process at max 5.5 transactions per second onchain which divided by the energy consumed per second is awful. but if it was processing 50,000 transactions per second the efficiency would literally be 10,000X greater.

              [–]CryptoNews1 8 points9 points  (1 child)

              Well at least posts like these are allowed on this sub unlike /r/bitcoin

              [–]ForkiusMaximus 96 points97 points  (20 children)

              Markets don't move straight up without correcting. Follow the dots: $600. $2500. $900. Is the price crashing or is it up a whopping 50% in just a couple weeks? Depends on your timescale.

              Zoom out. If it did this again, we'd be at $1350, then about $2000 in the next "pump and dump," then $3000 in the next and $4500 in the next (and likely near parity with BTC). A pump and dump that results in the price being way higher than before is not a pump and dump. It is a bull move. There will always be people who FOMO'd and then panicked and got burned; that's just the everpresent volatility in Bitcoin, so it's irrelevant to the actual market trend.

              [–][deleted]  (13 children)

              [deleted]

                [–]duckofyorkcaster 7 points8 points  (2 children)

                Where's the line for a crash vs. a correction? In the stock market, a 10% loss in a day is considered a crash. But crypto is obviously very different.

                [–]outbackdude 5 points6 points  (0 children)

                % loss in a short duration > % gain in a long duration = crash

                [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                There is a lot of naivety with regard to finance in crypto, plenty of people investing here but never elsewhere before. I mentioned a 20% crash of btc from 7750 to 6200, and one of the responses was a sarcastic 'yeah, 'crashed' to 6200', I guess in reference to how the price is still x amount higher than it was at some other earlier point. Everyone is looking at the dollars and cents and ignoring percentages.

                [–]kaczan3 6 points7 points  (3 children)

                I was thinking about it. There are better coins. There are even new technologies like Proof of Stake or Tangle. Maybe we're believing in BCH too much. Maybe it got left behind because Core held it hostage too long.

                [–]amorpisseur 16 points17 points  (1 child)

                Nobody cares if fees and transactions are too high..That's not Bitcoin's use from a long time, and we all know it.

                But when r/btc stopped being a sub about Bitcoin but a BCH echo chamber instead (using words the sub uses), it started denying it, and denying all facts going against pumping BCH.

                I'd still like to hear some opinions and a constructive discussion.

                BTC has become the store of value of crypto, you are right, and the day to day cash is gonna be handled by the fast and cheap technology that's gonna be the easiest to swap with Bitcoin, be it Lightning Network, another crypto with atomic swap, e.g. LTC, or something else.

                By trying to be both (store and cash), BCH is doomed because it's good at neither: it's not a store of value, and its onchain transactions can't scale exponentially: it can't compete with faster and cheaper coins (e.g. IOTA has no fee and transactions are confirmed in seconds, it's just an example, lots of altcoins can do better than BCH in this specific domain).

                [–]dementperson 82 points83 points  (72 children)

                People said the same thing back when Bitcoin crashed from $1100 to $200, or from $30 to $2... What is the utility you got to ask yourself.

                A coin with no utility will slowly wither no matter how big the market cap.

                It has and is already showing on the bitcoin dominance chart:

                Do you see a similarity with these charts?

                Ahdroid

                Windows

                Google

                And actually it was $11 Billion on Nov 12. That is some mighty money in any market

                [–][deleted]  (45 children)

                [deleted]

                  [–]dicentrax 13 points14 points  (1 child)

                  Considering the age of the coin, it is already filling 500kb-1mb blocks, that's pretty good.

                  It's closing in on LTC transaction numbers as well

                  mean while:

                  Ethereum is the transaction king, and BTC is actually stalling...

                  https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/transactions-btc-eth-bch-ltc-dash.html#log

                  [–]JonathanSilverbloodJonathan#100, Jack of all Trades 31 points32 points  (32 children)

                  Being utilized and having the potential to be used are two different things. Long-term money will always think long-term.

                  [–]jnd-cz 5 points6 points  (1 child)

                  Reminds me of VHS vs Betamax and other similar tech competitions. Often the best technical solution isn't the most successful one, Potential is wishful thinking when it's not used in practice. BTC has a lot of momentum, there are about 10 machines in my city where I can exchange money for Bitcoin, Litecoin, or Ethereum and that's about it. Big eshop is accepting BTC only. So BCH better get adopted quick, because there is a great potential in the top 10 on https://coinmarketcap.com/ and all of them can't be winners.

                  [–][deleted]  (18 children)

                  [deleted]

                    [–]blackmarble 13 points14 points  (2 children)

                    Exactly, what do you think people who bought Bitcoin below $20 we're doing? It wasn't nearly as useful back then, but there was potential.

                    [–]SomeoneOnThelnternet 10 points11 points  (0 children)

                    Fuckin lol. Would you say the same shit in btc's early days?

                    [–]JonathanSilverbloodJonathan#100, Jack of all Trades 21 points22 points  (7 children)

                    Yes. That's what ideology has it's basis in.

                    People don't take action in a given microsecond for the benefit of the particular microsecond; they take action to the benefit of their future.

                    [–]Vincents_keyboard 28 points29 points  (6 children)

                    It's always striking to me to see so much short-term thinking. Not even a week ago we were here, not even a week.

                    I feel that instant gratification is out in full swing, and will continue to persist in the generations to come.

                    However, am with you 100% of the way, we're in a good position to move forward now.

                    When price was $300 we were of the same mindset we are now, nothing has changed, it's just a matter of time, work and patience.

                    188 bits /u/tippr

                    [–]tippr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                    u/JonathanSilverblood, you've received 0.000188 BCH ($0.20536556 USD)!


                    How to use | What is Bitcoin Cash? | Who accepts it? | Powered by Rocketr | r/tippr
                    Bitcoin Cash is what Bitcoin should be. Ask about it on r/btc

                    [–]taipalag 2 points3 points  (1 child)

                    "The market is a device that transfers money from the impatient to the patient" Warren Buffet

                    [–]jessquit 31 points32 points  (5 children)

                    Since the entire future of Bitcoin Core now hinges on the Lightning Network remind me again about comparing current use and utility with some potential uncertain future use.

                    [–]knight222 7 points8 points  (7 children)

                    BTC is not being utilized neither.

                    [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                    Thank you for sharing the Android and Windows market share chart.

                    My understanding is their dominance is derived by a two-sided network effect: users go where the apps are and developers go where the users are. Google and Microsoft fueled this two-sided network effect by giving away their platform and developer tool kits away for free (respectively); thus, creating an incentive for developers to create apps when there were limited users.

                    It is evident BCH (USD, EUR, etc.) is driven by one-sided network effects: more users make the network more powerful (e.g. a telephone is not useful if you are the only one with a telephone).

                    My question: does BCH have any two-sided network effects? My suspicion is yes, or it will in the future, but I can not put my finger on it. I would like to hear the community's thoughts on this.

                    For example, Ethereum has the potential to be driven by a two-sided network effect: developing smart contracts that users want (although I do not see a "killer app" today). My fear with Ethereum is that the code is "immutable" and combined with decentralized smart contract development is a recipe for disaster (e.g. DAO hack, and Parity multi-signature wallet fiasco).

                    [–]ferretinjapan 5 points6 points  (3 children)

                    Precisely, I rode every single one of those dips out, Bitcoin Cash will be the same until the penny drops that BitcoinSW is no longer viable as a money.

                    [–]ArrayBoy 7 points8 points  (2 children)

                    But Bitcoin is doing anything but wither..

                    [–]dementperson 10 points11 points  (1 child)

                    I'm sure the first class party on titanic was fun as well

                    [–]8BitDragon 17 points18 points  (1 child)

                    BCH went up to $2500 / 0.5 btc from $600 / under 0.1 BTC in a little over a day. That kind of spike will correct, and it looks like the correction is going to take some time. Zoom out on the chart (make sure to use log scale) - the support line for the past month or so is just under $700 / 0.1 BTC now. We may well touch it before BCH settles and likely starts raising again.

                    There are tons of cryptocurrencies that have better features than bitcoin, but the first mover advantage is huge and gives bitcoin dominance a lot of inertia. BCH has the advantage over other contenders in that it mostly shares the ownerbase with bitcoin, making it financially easier for people to transition to using BCH from BTC. On the other hand, BCH doesn't (at least yet) fix all of bitcoins weaknesses, such as lacking full anonymity, or support for smart contracts.

                    If BCH is going to take over bitcoins role it's not going to happen overnight. The inertia of all the infrastructure and valuation tied into bitcoin is too great for that. Expect BCH to be a long term investment that perhaps doesn't pay off in the end, and as always, don't invest money you can't afford to lose.

                    [–]BTCrob 86 points87 points  (98 children)

                    You sound like you're coming to the realization that Ivebbeen arguing here for months. That is, the market does not care about things like block size and tx times. It cares primarily about one thing: market size and liquidity. This is why BTC will not be overtaken by any alt. You guys could be absolutely right with your tech argument (that big blocks are better) and still lose your shirt because that not what the market rewards.

                    I wrote a post about exactly this a few weeks ago. You may find it interesting

                    https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMarkets/comments/77twjx/why_the_debate_about_blocksize_is_irrelevent_and/

                    [–]fiah84 35 points36 points  (6 children)

                    How liquid was bitcoin last Sunday? How liquid will it be when last weekend is repeated with even higher fees?

                    [–]Vincents_keyboard 26 points27 points  (1 child)

                    Good point, not liquid then and definitely not going to be liquid the next time.

                    People in crypto seem to have a memory of a goldfish, not too long ago BCH was constantly under fire from concern trolls. We knew where we were heading then, and we know where we're heading now.

                    Long-term economics are in our favour. 108 bits /u/tippr

                    [–]tippr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                    u/fiah84, you've received 0.000108 BCH ($0.11517228 USD)!


                    How to use | What is Bitcoin Cash? | Who accepts it? | Powered by Rocketr | r/tippr
                    Bitcoin Cash is what Bitcoin should be. Ask about it on r/btc

                    [–]deadalnix 22 points23 points  (12 children)

                    Right now the biggest influence on the bicoin price do not seem to be liquidity, size of the market or anything else. It is, by far Tether. The correlation of the volume of tether and the bitcoin price is almost 1:1 . Check it out.

                    [–]gudlek 9 points10 points  (7 children)

                    What is tether?

                    [–]jayAreEee 5 points6 points  (1 child)

                    Ticker "USDT", issued by bitfinex out of thin air.

                    [–]capistor 6 points7 points  (6 children)

                    bitcoin's first use case is as a means of exchange. Amazon will never use a payment system with $100 fees. good luck with that.

                    [–][deleted] 20 points21 points  (49 children)

                    You realize this also leads to Bitcoin crashing hard, very hard, at some point?

                    While I agree with most of your points Bitcoin isn't gold. It has no use. You won't make jewels and electronics with it.

                    Markets at some point burn what's useless. Bitcoin's might be the pets.com of cryptos.

                    [–]gizram84 35 points36 points  (35 children)

                    Bitcoin isn't gold. It has no use

                    This is literally what every buttcoiner said 7 years ago.

                    You guys all miss the most important aspect. Decentralized, global, permissionless, trustless, censorship resistant value transfer.

                    This power isn't used best for buying a cup of coffee. This power is used best to topple authoritarian regimes and collapse central banks and their fiat currencies.

                    Buying coffee is not revolutionary, and you don't need a powerful decentralized network for it. But eluding capital controls, escaping financial tyranny, and being able to freely transfer your wealth without permission is revolutionary.

                    Bitcoin protects the revolutionary parts of system. Bitcoin Cash protects the act of buying a cup of coffee.

                    [–][deleted]  (3 children)

                    [deleted]

                      [–]esreveReverse 22 points23 points  (0 children)

                      Plenty of other coins do it even faster than BCH for even lower fees than BCH. If that's all BCH has to offer other than being the first alt to attempt to steal the name, then I'm afraid it will die.

                      [–]honestlyimeanreally 3 points4 points  (0 children)

                      Why does a subreddit’s censorship have anything to do with the technology’s potential for censorship?

                      Poor, irrelevant argument.

                      [–]gizram84 7 points8 points  (0 children)

                      I don't give a shit about theymos or the other subreddit. That has nothing to do with the technology behind bitcoin.

                      [–]moonymango 9 points10 points  (7 children)

                      Decentralized, global, permissionless, trustless, censorship resistant value transfer.

                      All these adjectives (except global maybe) are diminished by making it harder to transact on-chain.

                      [–]SomeoneOnThelnternet 3 points4 points  (10 children)

                      value transfer.

                      I agreed with you up to that part. Because how will you transfer your value when blocks are full.

                      You won't be able to topple shit if only the ruling class is able to transact and move money by paying ridiculous fees.

                      How will core coin help the regular Joe topple his authoritarian regime when he can't afford to use it?

                      [–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (3 children)

                      I missed libertarians, but they miss one important thing, there's few of them and if crypto adoption is very low even now, with crypto to fiat conversion ban, even on the deep web nobody will give two fucks about cryptos.

                      They ain't gonna sell you drugs, or whatever, for something that they themselves don't know how to use.

                      Cryptos have a value till people have a benefit using them or there are people giving them a value.

                      If a crypto ban will happen (you can't ban cryptos, but you can force banks to not trade with crypto exchanges, and they can ban exchanges too), cryptos are over.

                      99.999% people who got in cryptos got here for a get-rich-quick opportunity, they didn't come here for financial freedom. I know it, you know it.

                      You see very well the world around you and the community you're part of.

                      How many times have you seriously reed the word "disruption" in the last 6 months of browsing crypto related news and how many times have you read fiat and price.

                      Very few people care about crypto adoption.

                      Let's face reality, to the world population cryptos bring no tangible advantage. They aren't faster, more secure, stable, recognized and most importantly easy to use as fiat currencies.

                      Actually I truly believe that money came into cryptos much too sooner than it should've and cryptos lost most of their originally envisioned purpose. We needed to scale before, we needed well working decentralized exchanges before than money came.

                      [–]Ronoh 5 points6 points  (0 children)

                      People don't understand that we are running the largest economic experiment ever done.

                      Back when the internet started taking off, we had Altavista, Lycos, many more and then Yahoo. They were big, and Yahoo became a giant, seemed that it had figured it all out. And Ebay.

                      Then Google came and sweep them away. As result we have many people that suffered because they bet on the wrong horse, and many that triumphed for the opposite. However in overall we all benefited of the innovation race.

                      BTC and BCH might all seem flawed, and they are. And time will put each in their place. I don't think that either of them are the google that will dominate. But that is very unpopular to say here.

                      In any case it is nice that you opened the discussion.

                      [–]plaingo 27 points28 points  (19 children)

                      Nobody cares if fees and transactions are too high

                      AHAHAHAHAAAHAHAHAHAHAAHA.

                      Are you serious? It's incredibly frustrating. The only reason it might not be "bitcoin's use for a long time" is because fees have been too high for a long time.

                      I and everybody else who bought in 2011 bought while we talked of how Bitcoin would take over as a payment system. How it would be a money that could replace the dollar, and, yes, how that would give it a large valuation...

                      [–]Paperbag1776 10 points11 points  (3 children)

                      I just saw the price of bitcoin - $7411.01. Last week it was around $5k. Holy shit this is climbing up fast. Too bad I'm just a student.

                      [–]chainxor 22 points23 points  (12 children)

                      Patience. Adoption takes time and it is going in the right direction. Also, it is absurd calling it pump and dump. If it was a pump and dump we would already be back at $300. It won't go lower than $700, unless something cataclysmic happens (of course we can never know for sure, it is crypto), but the likelihood is low given the already established support.

                      [–]boglehead28 7 points8 points  (2 children)

                      RemindMe! 2 weeks

                      [–]Juankestein 5 points6 points  (0 children)

                      Yes, in two weeks normal people will give a fuck about block sizes and will understand what a fork means. People here think they give a good image by posting trash about Core all fucking day lmao. This coin is pumped only by people that are super into crypto, not a normal person that heard "Bitcoin cash" and didn't think it was a BTC ripoff.

                      edit: btc pretends theres nothing wrong with high fees and tx times, and bch pretends people like their pre-made coin and care about fucking blocks lol

                      [–]yeastblood 14 points15 points  (4 children)

                      The flippenning turned into the humbling. Hope a lot of you learned from this 2nd PND, dont get burned by the next.

                      [–]Uejji 27 points28 points  (18 children)

                      BTC falls after rapid growth but still maintains net positive displacement: "Buy, buy, buy!"

                      BCH falls after rapid growth but still maintains net positive displacement: "Obvious pump and dump!"

                      I wonder if BCH really is the problem here.

                      [–]Dainathon 11 points12 points  (13 children)

                      BCH went up like 200% in a day and idk 300% or something over two days then lost half its value

                      It literally went up (pump) insanely fast and then plummeted (or dump) also insanely fast

                      That was totally a pump and dump

                      BTC has roots and people believe in it being fixed in the future and thats why people buy it

                      If most people believed that it wouls just never be fixed then it wouldnt be worth much (and before you say BCH fixes it, lots of people dont like how BCH fixes it)

                      [–]Uejji 13 points14 points  (12 children)

                      So, "pump and dump" doesn't mean something that rapidly climbs in price and then falls in price.

                      A pump and dump is a scam where early investors do price manipulation though social engineering, etc, to artificially boost (pump) the price and then completely sell (dump) their holdings during the resulting wave of high buy orders.

                      [–]Dainathon 6 points7 points  (5 children)

                      Im saying that it was artificial because of how rapid it was

                      [–]Uejji 8 points9 points  (4 children)

                      It was rapid because it was a very emotional period of time. BTC was broken for a little while, and it seems a lot of people tried to move over to BCH which made BTC plummet and made BCH rocket up.

                      Just like every other period like this, people made mistakes and bought on FOMO, other people sold on ATH and made a lot of money, and now it's basically stabilized higher than it was before, exhibiting healthy growth.

                      All it was was a bunch of money moving around. Calling that a pump and dump really waters the term down for when we really need to use it to call out a scam.

                      [–]seweso 11 points12 points  (1 child)

                      Bitcoin Cash was handed out to everyone owning Bitcoin, and many aren't too happy with Bitcoin Cash. So yes, it will be dumped.

                      It's a speculative asset. It needs to evolve and get used a LOT more to reach its potential.

                      [–]imaginary_username 3 points4 points  (0 children)

                      The problem is priceposting: speculators come and go without changing the fundamentals one iota, and people who are looking to get rich quick within a month are somehow swinged by it. It's bad on the way down, and it's bad on the way up.

                      I've been numb since $300, and will continue to do so. Keep pushing for adoption and speculators can come whenever they like, we're only 3 and a half months in.

                      [–]JustACryptoGuy 8 points9 points  (2 children)

                      It usually happens in this market... Can't say if this is right or wrong but seems okay to me... But it's so interesting to see so much.. 📈👌

                      [–]MrAmos123 6 points7 points  (12 children)

                      I screwed up pretty bad rn... Put my BTC into BCH.

                      BTC at 6000 and BCH at 1300

                      Now BTC is at 7850 and BCH is at 1000

                      I've lost loads... :(

                      I don't know what to do because if I convert it anywhere I'm doing what every stupid mistake in stocks are, buying high, selling low...

                      [–]Krustaf 5 points6 points  (2 children)

                      Hopefully you learned your lesson

                      [–]nr28 5 points6 points  (0 children)

                      That's a very bad position to be in now, I'm not sure either. I rode the BCH wave to 2100 before calling it quits and going back ETH, it had all the signs of a pump and the order books were very thin (takes one whale to mess everyone up).

                      You can either sit it out and hope things retrace or cut your losses and make wise investments (BTC isn't wise either, it takes a lot now to get anything out of it).

                      [–]wilwinnfield 8 points9 points  (0 children)

                      I want to thank all BCH buyers for the cheap bitcoins you gave me these past days. It's amazing that someone was willing to give me BTC for shit. Thank you! <3

                      [–]SouliG 9 points10 points  (3 children)

                      if I get banned in this sub for speaking the truth I don't care. BCH has potential, sure. However, will it replace bitcoin? I don't think so. Why? Without going into full detail, I'm want to keep this short, Bitcoin keeps it values when it comes to why it even came into existence and it's goals and does not sacrifice it for short term solutions to short term problems. I also believe that bitcoin will eventually need to increase it's blocksize as it will help a lot but what bitcoin cash is trying to do is already being done much better by so many other altcoins like dash and litecoin and even potentially bitcoin in the future which will make even them less valuable. So I don't see how bitcoin cash could replace bitcoin, outperform litecoin/dash/others or traditional players like paypal.

                      [–]Namevo 11 points12 points  (0 children)

                      Yeah, that's because BCH is a pump and dump, and a lot of you will be left with heavy bags, while your idols dump on you and make millions.

                      [–]Raineko 16 points17 points  (17 children)

                      If enough stores accept BCH, the demand will rise. BTC currently is a speculation tool, I assume mostly traded virtually offchain.

                      [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

                      cuz everyone sees BCH as a scam coin and gives it no respect. anyone investing in this coin is playing with major fire. as far as high transaction fees etc with BTC, those are gonna be solved soon enuff, and if ppl want alts with low fees and fast transactions, BCH is by far not the best alternative either.

                      [–]dicentrax 14 points15 points  (4 children)

                      9/10 for concern trolling

                      Give it time... the coin is 3 months old and consolidating $700-$1200.

                      It has:

                      • Relatively small but very involved community

                      • Supported by some of the biggest BTC miners

                      • Decentralized development

                      • Well known BTC devs (from before core) openly supporting BCH

                      • Some high profile early BTC adopters openly supporting BCH

                      • Possible support from "segwit2x" companies in the near future.

                      BCH is gaining ground in areas BTC lost long ago:

                      • gambling

                      • remittances

                      • commerce

                      • Hell, even gimmicks like u/tippr are back

                      Most importantly:

                      No scaling issues on the short - mid term, BCH can scale up to 32MB blocks.

                      BTC scaling depends 100% on off-chain lighting networks and side-chains, both are still vaporware and at least ~18 months away. The other core "product" Segwit has stalled at ~10% adoption, and even with full 100% adoption it will never reach more than ~2mb scaling.

                      So why is bitcoin going up?

                      Easy, everybody is buying it for the sole purpose of selling it to the greater fool. At least that is what I'm doing, I hope BTC will go to 30k so I can dump my profits on the newbs. I leave my bitcoins on the exchange, I don't even bother using the network anymore. That's NOT a healthy sign! I'll take my chances with BCH, sure it could go to $0 but it could also go to $10k just as easily.

                      [–]Morexry 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                      The reason why the btc has been rising is purely the communication which has come up with last ATH. People got to know the btc more and more, and they dont look any futher than the tip of their noses and look for possible better coins.

                      the fact is that they use it as a way of storing their money and gaining more profits than a simple bank interrest. The more non-crypto knowing people join in the higher the btc price will go even though the BCC is better technological wise.

                      [–]y-c-c 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                      Nobody cares if fees and transactions are too high..That's not Bitcoin's use from a long time, and we all know it.

                      I was with you until this. The high fees is literally the problem facing Bitcoin now. People don't use Bitcoin for coffee now because they literally can't, not due to lack of desire. Even for online shopping or donations, I hesitate to pay in BTCs these days since so much of the money goes to fees instead of the recipient. This leads to a feedback loop with merchants dropping out, etc.

                      People are going to find a solution either way, either with BCH, or other cryptocurrency, or maybe even just go back with good old ACH/credit cards. Solutions solve problems for people, not the other way round with people fitting themselves for a solution.

                      What I do know though is if Bitcoin is not useful, they aren't just going to use it for settlement. They are just going to not use it at all.

                      [–]AgentOrange256 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                      Literally only two weeks ago it was worth a few hundred. get over it.

                      [–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                      My long term investment thesis is as follows:

                      • bitcoin/cryptocurrencies will never go away. By their nature, even if there's a UN resolution banning the exchange of crypto for fiat, it will go underground, barter, etc. If such a thing happened, price would probably be depressed for a long time, but it's not going away, just like the internet's not going away.

                      • I want to promote this view a bit more, to get it out there and see what people in the community think about it, but here it is: I think bitcoin/cryptos have a really interesting use case for microtransactions. Say you want to charge $0.000001 for something like a newspaper article, or a song. Right now you kinda can't, not with Visa/Paypal/etc. But this is easy to do with cryptocurrencies that have low fees (yes, that's a swipe at BTC). If crypto's can scale, and if/when someone finds a cool high-volume use case for microtransactions, then we will see real demand to cryptos and the price will start making sense.

                      As relates to BTC vs. BCH.... I've already swiped BTC. The high fees are ridiculous... Lightning Network is cool, but after reading many posts on reddit/medium/twitter from various core devs, I am concerned that they've adopted an extremist view when it comes to decentralization and are not focused on scaling in a practical way. For BCH, fees are low, developers (i.e. deadalnix) seem reasonable, but not a lot of activity going on in terms of scaling beyond blocksize increase, so there's risk with BCH that not enough manpower/resources/innovation will materialize to scale it before some top 30 coin gets everyone's attention and usurps both BTC/BCH.

                      Conclusion: BTC/BCH have brand recognition that other coins do not, which is not to be underestimated, but do have non-trivial issues without clear solutions. Other coins are interesting. So invest a good bit into BTC/BCH and throw a little bit at the alt-coins to hedge your bets. Re-evaluate as necessary.

                      Not responsible for any losses you incur by listening to me.

                      [–]megadethZ 2 points3 points  (4 children)

                      Surprisingly its holding its own inspite of:

                      • Coinbase opening up withdrawals in Jan
                      • Bitmex unloading
                      • GBTC unloading
                      • <insert-exchange-or-hater> unloading

                      [–]keihardhet 5 points6 points  (2 children)

                      Once coinbase opens the accounts BCH will dump to oblivion.

                      [–]greedo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

                      Most likely scenario is that BTC and ETH moon and everything else rises, then diminishes. ETH will be solving the problems that BCH hopes to. BTC will be a inert store of value like gold.

                      [–]todu 2 points3 points  (3 children)

                      Thank you for sharing your concerns dear concern troll. I disagree with all of them. You're just a small blocker pretending to be "a concerned big blocker" and the voting bots in this post are very obvious. Most heavily up voted small blocker comments in this post are made by Reddit accounts that have no history at all in my RES extension which indicates that they are bought accounts.

                      [–]BitcoinMD 2 points3 points  (1 child)

                      Here's a little secret ... I own BTC and BCH in exactly equal amounts (in terms of coins, not dollars). No matter which one loses, I win.

                      [–]keihardhet 6 points7 points  (2 children)

                      I don't see much use for BCH in the long run, unless they can get rid of the scammers at the top, rebrand and try to incorporate useful things like lightning and anonymity. But hey, why not just the litecoin project then? This whole project was a clown show, I ran a node at first in the very beginning, and stopped once the PR-tactics came into play. Yes, ... high fees in BTC are a problem. But BCH doesn't solve that with something that's sustainable ... and on top of that the devs behind it didn't prove themselves. I'm out. Dropped my BCH after the fork in august, bought in at 270$ again then out at 1560$ - thanks for the free meal Roger.

                      [–]Ce_ne 7 points8 points  (0 children)

                      If you guys are still not clear, this pump was done in purpose so Jihan and his friends can dump the BCH at a highest price as possible since they were sitting on really huge chunk of them mining at a loss over the last few months. That was it. Next time learn Not to Trust, but Verify.

                      [–]Orrs-Law 4 points5 points  (5 children)

                      Buy at $900-850 after that we'll land some where around 2800.

                      [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

                      What did you expect after such a blatant manipulation-pump?

                      [–]jetrucci 9 points10 points  (1 child)

                      Bu bu bu tha flipppenninnggg?!

                      [–]drzood 3 points4 points  (0 children)

                      Agreed and well put.

                      I don't really think BCH solves anything that has not been solved already. BTC is a store of value. It's creaky but fine for what it is. And it is the one coin everyone knows about. There are plenty of other options that do the fast and cheap transactions better and are already established. Litecoin is the obvious one. The way this has played is not good for future Crypto uptake and image in general.

                      [–]5boros 3 points4 points  (0 children)

                      I'll probably get shit for saying this but here goes...

                      BCH has huge practical advantages over BTC, and if this was 2015 it would have already overtaken the rival chain. Alas, we're in 2017 now and there are well established cryptocurrencies that take most of the shine out of those advantages over BTC. The maximalist's secret altcoin envy that made them decide to throw away BTC's original vision for a segwit/lightning future will never match the technical performance of other altcoins.

                      Don't forget, BCH is also competing ETH, which has more infrastructure/exchanges in place, and also costs much less to do even faster transactions than BCH. IOTA also just left it's alpha, for it's beta phase and should become useful way before BCH can overtake BTC's market cap.

                      [–]kickshark1 5 points6 points  (0 children)

                      The past weekend pump and dump pissed a lot of people off, whether they are core supporters or not.

                      [–]skandale 6 points7 points  (1 child)

                      You make some good points and i'm not going to argue with you. The fact of a matter is BCH is for many, including my self a scheme made by select individuals. I am not talking about the Bch it self, I am talking about the Segwit2x > BCH pump and dump. This is in my and many other's opinion a elaborate scheme. I somehow firmly believes that Roger Ver is involved with this scheme.

                      Facts: Bch has lower transaction fees Bch is not as decentralized as Bitcoin Bch tx fees will increase over time because of 1. Increased user load and 2. Miners who spam pointless of transactions. I think we can all agree that Bitcoin has this recent week faced it's most threatening attack since it was launched. The fact that Bitcoin managed to survive such a threat boad's indeed well for Bitcoin, both in the short and in the long term. What is damaged and heals will come back even stronger and now that people have seen with their own eyes how resilient Bitcoin is, it will without a doubt in my opinion cause a stronger confidence in Bitcoin. Which is exactly what we are seeing. People are realizing Bitcoin's future is way more promising than Bch. This to me looks like people are jumping in the Bitcoin train.

                      Even though Bch is at a alltime low since the Bump & dump. It may very well be part of a end-game scheme yet and I do think it's gonna bounce up a little bit, but not as high as it has been. My prediction is 1200 by the end of week and then people will probably start dumping it for good which means the prices will dip back to sub 600 tresh hold.

                      Bitcoin is a cryptocurrency for longterm financial gain just like Gold for fiat. Bitcoin Cash will in my opinion never get more ecconomical capital than Bitcoin but I do believe people will continue to use it.

                      [–]hbcryptor 3 points4 points  (1 child)

                      BCH will never overtake BTC

                      [–]lnform 8 points9 points  (3 children)

                      Way to much focus on price. That's r/bitcoin things. BCH wont take over the world in a month. Btw fresh: https://i.imgur.com/vxvBYIW.gif

                      [–]DetrART 7 points8 points  (9 children)

                      What changed about BCH fundamentally that justified it going from $600 to $2800? Nothing, it was a pump. Its fair price is still somewhere around $600.

                      [–]mjh808 2 points3 points  (5 children)

                      People were waiting for news on 2x, it didn't happen thus the move to BCH so it should be higher than what it was then.

                      [–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

                      What changed about Bitcoin to justify its price? Shit, Bitcoin has gotten worse and its price goes up. That’s not a good sign.

                      [–]coinfeller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

                      Buy low and be happy :)

                      [–]but_without_words 1 point2 points  (2 children)

                      But BTC's close to ATH again..Sure, I agree with whoever calls it a get-rich-quick scheme, it has absolutely no potential,

                      why do you think BTC is a get-rich-quick scheme, assuming you don't believe this about all cryptos?

                      Nobody cares if fees and transactions are too high..That's not Bitcoin's use from a long time, and we all know it.

                      so you see no advantage to uncapped block sizes, i.e. the only thing bch does differently? why are you investing in bch at all then?